🇾🇪 Breaking: Yemeni Armed Forces announce they targeted the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman and enemy warships north of the Red Sea with multiple cruise missiles and drones in recent hours.
The statement declares that ongoing U.S. aggression has failed to impact Yemen’s military capabilities, and confirms continued defensive operations by land and sea:
“With Allah’s help, we continue to perform our defensive duties on land and at sea.”
🔹@enemywatch
The statement declares that ongoing U.S. aggression has failed to impact Yemen’s military capabilities, and confirms continued defensive operations by land and sea:
“With Allah’s help, we continue to perform our defensive duties on land and at sea.”
🔹@enemywatch
❤35🔥3🙏2
✅ | Instead of working toward the formation of a genuine Islamic front to support the resistance axis and secure the future of Muslim-majority nations, Mr. Erdoğan—the self-proclaimed caliph for the simple-minded—is busy begging for entry into the European Union.
So, Mr. Westophile, in exchange for the gift of Syria’s fragmentation, you expect the EU to embrace Turkey?
Do whatever you like, but the Europeans will always see you as expendable—used when needed, discarded without a second thought. Sit under the boots of tyrants and oppressors, and all you’ll earn is humiliation.
In the process, you’re exposing your true colors—driven by greed, obsessed with power—and dragging not only Syria into ruin, but your own nation as well.
🔹@enemywatch
So, Mr. Westophile, in exchange for the gift of Syria’s fragmentation, you expect the EU to embrace Turkey?
Do whatever you like, but the Europeans will always see you as expendable—used when needed, discarded without a second thought. Sit under the boots of tyrants and oppressors, and all you’ll earn is humiliation.
In the process, you’re exposing your true colors—driven by greed, obsessed with power—and dragging not only Syria into ruin, but your own nation as well.
🔹@enemywatch
💯30
☑️ | The world is not as blind or naïve as the Turkish regime assumes. Their collaboration with the Jews hasn’t just been exposed—it’s now undeniable and cemented.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯50😱4
🇸🇾 Breaking: Statement Issued by the Islamic Resistance Front in Syria – Auliya al-Ba’s:
Zionist incursions into our Syrian land are increasing, accompanied by sectarian incitement, manufactured chaos, and a suspicious silence from the de facto ruling authority—unsurprisingly, as it is the loyal subordinate of the Turkish occupation. This occupation has now begun the second chapter of its staged confrontation with the Zionist enemy, all in the context of dividing Syria and alternating control over geographic points. The Seljuk ambitions are no different from those of the Zionists, both backed by the American regime—the head of global evil.
These escalating provocations and Zionist intrusions coincide with Syria’s internal disarray and the deep weakness of the authority in Damascus. Meanwhile, there are dubious calls to disarm the people of Daraa and its countryside, along with systematic incitement to encourage such disarmament.
Here, the Islamic Resistance Front in Syria – Auliya al-Ba’s – calls upon the people of Daraa and its countryside, and all our fellow Syrians—whether organized within the Front or volunteering independently—not to surrender their weapons and not to fulfill the Zionist wish of creating a permissive climate for any future invasion.
We urge all Syrians to organize, prepare, and await the signal to begin the next phase of resistance against the enemy and the various occupying forces that plague our geography. Do not heed the threats or promises of the enemy and their collaborators. Hold fast to the true path of jihad in facing the aggressors—for love of homeland is part of faith, and surely Allah will bring His command to fulfillment.
Political Department
Date: April 11, 2025
#SyrianResistance
🔸@enemywatch
Zionist incursions into our Syrian land are increasing, accompanied by sectarian incitement, manufactured chaos, and a suspicious silence from the de facto ruling authority—unsurprisingly, as it is the loyal subordinate of the Turkish occupation. This occupation has now begun the second chapter of its staged confrontation with the Zionist enemy, all in the context of dividing Syria and alternating control over geographic points. The Seljuk ambitions are no different from those of the Zionists, both backed by the American regime—the head of global evil.
These escalating provocations and Zionist intrusions coincide with Syria’s internal disarray and the deep weakness of the authority in Damascus. Meanwhile, there are dubious calls to disarm the people of Daraa and its countryside, along with systematic incitement to encourage such disarmament.
Here, the Islamic Resistance Front in Syria – Auliya al-Ba’s – calls upon the people of Daraa and its countryside, and all our fellow Syrians—whether organized within the Front or volunteering independently—not to surrender their weapons and not to fulfill the Zionist wish of creating a permissive climate for any future invasion.
We urge all Syrians to organize, prepare, and await the signal to begin the next phase of resistance against the enemy and the various occupying forces that plague our geography. Do not heed the threats or promises of the enemy and their collaborators. Hold fast to the true path of jihad in facing the aggressors—for love of homeland is part of faith, and surely Allah will bring His command to fulfillment.
Political Department
Date: April 11, 2025
#SyrianResistance
🔸@enemywatch
❤31🔥3🙏3🕊1💯1
❎ Many members have left after finally seeing Erdoğan’s true face. We urge the rest to do the same—there will be no issues. We will continue even if only 10 or 20 remain.
🔥40❤13
🇾🇪 Breaking: Ten U.S. airstrikes hit multiple targets across Yemen in the past hours. At the same time, initial reports indicate Saudi artillery shelling on areas within Saada Governorate, northern Yemen.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
😡34
🇮🇷 Important: The office of Imam Khamenei (H) released an article over the issue of indirect talks in Oman, and as per prediction, it seems it was approved by the office of Imam Khamenei (H). But why and how? What is the perspective of Imam Khamenei (H)? Must read the article over it. (1/3):
With the announcement made by the U.S. President on Monday night at the White House, the course of events between the two countries entered a new and faster phase. Trump, who was hosting the criminal Prime Minister of the Zionist regime, told reporters present in the Oval Office that on Saturday, a very large meeting between the U.S. and Iran would take place, directly and at the highest level. He then repeated his usual claim, stating that although the agreement would be beneficial for Iran, if the negotiations do not succeed, there would be severe consequences for Iran—meaning the old carrot-and-stick policy!
Seyyed Abbas Araghchi, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran, who was on his way to Algeria, wrote a few hours later on his social media account: “Iran and the United States will meet in Oman on Saturday for indirect talks at the senior officials level. This is both an opportunity and a test. The ball is in America’s court.” Further reports indicated that these talks would be attended by Mr. Seyyed Abbas Araghchi for Iran and Steve Biegun, the U.S. Special Representative for Iran, for the U.S.
Immediately after Trump’s statements, analyses, speculations, and comments were widely spread in media and social networks. Western and counter-revolutionary media worked tirelessly to promote the idea that the Islamic Republic had backed down from its previous stance on negotiations with the U.S. and that the pressures of Trump’s government had borne fruit. Trump’s sudden announcement also sparked a widespread media frenzy and various suspicions.
Why Does Trump Enjoy Surprises?
Trump’s surprising stance on negotiations with Iran on Monday night was not new. He had taken the same approach regarding the sending of a letter to the Islamic Republic, making a completely unexpected and sudden statement in a television interview that he had written to Iran and requested negotiations—a letter that arrived in Iran several days later!
Such approaches to sensitive issues are not common in the realm of diplomacy. It could be said that they fall outside the classical rules of diplomacy and international relations. However, Trump seeks to distinguish himself in almost all areas and prefers to directly intervene, rather than moving forward through traditional channels. Apart from the fact that this behavior is rooted in Trump’s political psychology, his main objective with these media stunts is to influence public opinion in general, and especially to affect Iranians in a targeted manner.
This issue has also not escaped the attention of the Leader of the Revolution, who addressed this goal in the case of the letter, stating:
“When the U.S. President says we are ready to negotiate with Iran, and invites us to negotiate and claims that he sent a letter—which, of course, has not reached us, meaning it hasn’t reached me—this, in my view, is a deception of global public opinion. It means we are ready to negotiate, we want peace, no conflict, but Iran is unwilling to negotiate.”
Trump’s Monday night remarks can be seen as a continuation of this line, which seeks to convince the global public and Iranians themselves that the U.S. is looking for serious negotiations and solutions to issues between the two countries, while in reality, it is the Islamic Republic that supposedly has no interest in these talks.
🔹@enemywatch
+
With the announcement made by the U.S. President on Monday night at the White House, the course of events between the two countries entered a new and faster phase. Trump, who was hosting the criminal Prime Minister of the Zionist regime, told reporters present in the Oval Office that on Saturday, a very large meeting between the U.S. and Iran would take place, directly and at the highest level. He then repeated his usual claim, stating that although the agreement would be beneficial for Iran, if the negotiations do not succeed, there would be severe consequences for Iran—meaning the old carrot-and-stick policy!
Seyyed Abbas Araghchi, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran, who was on his way to Algeria, wrote a few hours later on his social media account: “Iran and the United States will meet in Oman on Saturday for indirect talks at the senior officials level. This is both an opportunity and a test. The ball is in America’s court.” Further reports indicated that these talks would be attended by Mr. Seyyed Abbas Araghchi for Iran and Steve Biegun, the U.S. Special Representative for Iran, for the U.S.
Immediately after Trump’s statements, analyses, speculations, and comments were widely spread in media and social networks. Western and counter-revolutionary media worked tirelessly to promote the idea that the Islamic Republic had backed down from its previous stance on negotiations with the U.S. and that the pressures of Trump’s government had borne fruit. Trump’s sudden announcement also sparked a widespread media frenzy and various suspicions.
Why Does Trump Enjoy Surprises?
Trump’s surprising stance on negotiations with Iran on Monday night was not new. He had taken the same approach regarding the sending of a letter to the Islamic Republic, making a completely unexpected and sudden statement in a television interview that he had written to Iran and requested negotiations—a letter that arrived in Iran several days later!
Such approaches to sensitive issues are not common in the realm of diplomacy. It could be said that they fall outside the classical rules of diplomacy and international relations. However, Trump seeks to distinguish himself in almost all areas and prefers to directly intervene, rather than moving forward through traditional channels. Apart from the fact that this behavior is rooted in Trump’s political psychology, his main objective with these media stunts is to influence public opinion in general, and especially to affect Iranians in a targeted manner.
This issue has also not escaped the attention of the Leader of the Revolution, who addressed this goal in the case of the letter, stating:
“When the U.S. President says we are ready to negotiate with Iran, and invites us to negotiate and claims that he sent a letter—which, of course, has not reached us, meaning it hasn’t reached me—this, in my view, is a deception of global public opinion. It means we are ready to negotiate, we want peace, no conflict, but Iran is unwilling to negotiate.”
Trump’s Monday night remarks can be seen as a continuation of this line, which seeks to convince the global public and Iranians themselves that the U.S. is looking for serious negotiations and solutions to issues between the two countries, while in reality, it is the Islamic Republic that supposedly has no interest in these talks.
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤17💯7
Enemy Watch — Official
🇮🇷 Important: The office of Imam Khamenei (H) released an article over the issue of indirect talks in Oman, and as per prediction, it seems it was approved by the office of Imam Khamenei (H). But why and how? What is the perspective of Imam Khamenei (H)? Must…
+
(2/3):
Why Was Indirect Negotiation Approved?
One of the doubts spread by the enemy shortly after Trump’s statements was that the Islamic Republic of Iran had backed down in the face of the pressures and threats from Trump’s government, and that agreeing to negotiate was the result of such a process and calculation. The recent statements by the U.S. Secretary of State are also worth assessing and analyzing in this context.
Why did Iran agree to indirect negotiations with the U.S.? Looking at the events and positions of the U.S. government, it is evident that after withdrawing from the JCPOA (Iran Nuclear Deal), the Americans have consistently sought a broader agreement. Indirect negotiations with the U.S. to revive the JCPOA have been ongoing for several years, both during President Rouhani’s administration and under the leadership of Martyr Raisi. The Islamic Republic has not been opposed to these discussions. What prevented the negotiations from succeeding were the Americans’ demands for concessions and their introduction of non-nuclear issues.
In mid-February 1403 (2025), Trump, newly back in the White House, signed an official document regarding Iran, titled “Presidential Memorandum on National Security.” In this document, as in the past, a wide range of claims and demands were made regarding Iran, from the nuclear issue to Iran’s defensive capabilities and regional matters. Logic dictates that, under such circumstances, Iran should stand firm against the enemy and reject submission and compromise under the guise of “negotiation.”
Despite the military threats and disruptive actions from the U.S., there was no wavering in Tehran’s calculations. The situation shifted when Trump, in his letter, in a sense, backed down from his previous positions and signaled a green light for limiting the scope of the negotiations to the nuclear issue. This, coupled with the U.S. government’s heavy efforts to blame the Islamic Republic for escalating tensions in the global public opinion, especially among the Iranian people, led to the conclusion that the Islamic Republic would respond to Trump’s letter. This response not only opened the door for indirect negotiations but also presented a firm stance against Trump’s rhetoric.
The Upper Hand of the Islamic Republic
Although the American side tries to portray itself as having the upper hand in this rivalry, the reality is that, so far, in practice, the upper hand belongs to Iran. This superiority is currently evident in three areas: the need for negotiations to be limited to the nuclear issue, the location of the negotiations, and, finally, the indirect nature of the negotiations.
Regarding the limitation of the negotiations to the nuclear issue, although the U.S. government has somewhat retreated, this should not and cannot lead to optimism or, consequently, excitement. The Americans are accustomed to lying and breaking their promises, and they may raise unrelated issues during or in the middle of the negotiations. The indirect nature of the negotiations allows Iran to disengage, with little or no cost, if the other side tries to make demands or bring up irrelevant topics such as Iran’s defense capabilities and regional issues.
Trump’s media manipulation and false statements about the nature of the negotiations are also tied to this issue. He is attempting to create psychological operations and media pressure to force Iran into direct negotiations, while, in practice, the U.S. has agreed to indirect talks.
🔹@enemywatch
+
(2/3):
Why Was Indirect Negotiation Approved?
One of the doubts spread by the enemy shortly after Trump’s statements was that the Islamic Republic of Iran had backed down in the face of the pressures and threats from Trump’s government, and that agreeing to negotiate was the result of such a process and calculation. The recent statements by the U.S. Secretary of State are also worth assessing and analyzing in this context.
Why did Iran agree to indirect negotiations with the U.S.? Looking at the events and positions of the U.S. government, it is evident that after withdrawing from the JCPOA (Iran Nuclear Deal), the Americans have consistently sought a broader agreement. Indirect negotiations with the U.S. to revive the JCPOA have been ongoing for several years, both during President Rouhani’s administration and under the leadership of Martyr Raisi. The Islamic Republic has not been opposed to these discussions. What prevented the negotiations from succeeding were the Americans’ demands for concessions and their introduction of non-nuclear issues.
In mid-February 1403 (2025), Trump, newly back in the White House, signed an official document regarding Iran, titled “Presidential Memorandum on National Security.” In this document, as in the past, a wide range of claims and demands were made regarding Iran, from the nuclear issue to Iran’s defensive capabilities and regional matters. Logic dictates that, under such circumstances, Iran should stand firm against the enemy and reject submission and compromise under the guise of “negotiation.”
Despite the military threats and disruptive actions from the U.S., there was no wavering in Tehran’s calculations. The situation shifted when Trump, in his letter, in a sense, backed down from his previous positions and signaled a green light for limiting the scope of the negotiations to the nuclear issue. This, coupled with the U.S. government’s heavy efforts to blame the Islamic Republic for escalating tensions in the global public opinion, especially among the Iranian people, led to the conclusion that the Islamic Republic would respond to Trump’s letter. This response not only opened the door for indirect negotiations but also presented a firm stance against Trump’s rhetoric.
The Upper Hand of the Islamic Republic
Although the American side tries to portray itself as having the upper hand in this rivalry, the reality is that, so far, in practice, the upper hand belongs to Iran. This superiority is currently evident in three areas: the need for negotiations to be limited to the nuclear issue, the location of the negotiations, and, finally, the indirect nature of the negotiations.
Regarding the limitation of the negotiations to the nuclear issue, although the U.S. government has somewhat retreated, this should not and cannot lead to optimism or, consequently, excitement. The Americans are accustomed to lying and breaking their promises, and they may raise unrelated issues during or in the middle of the negotiations. The indirect nature of the negotiations allows Iran to disengage, with little or no cost, if the other side tries to make demands or bring up irrelevant topics such as Iran’s defense capabilities and regional issues.
Trump’s media manipulation and false statements about the nature of the negotiations are also tied to this issue. He is attempting to create psychological operations and media pressure to force Iran into direct negotiations, while, in practice, the U.S. has agreed to indirect talks.
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤15💯4
Enemy Watch — Official
+ (2/3): Why Was Indirect Negotiation Approved? One of the doubts spread by the enemy shortly after Trump’s statements was that the Islamic Republic of Iran had backed down in the face of the pressures and threats from Trump’s government, and that agreeing…
+
(3/3):
Two Serious Warnings:
In any case, the indirect negotiations between Iran and the U.S. will begin next Saturday in Oman, and for now, the Islamic Republic of Iran holds the upper hand. However, there are two very important and serious points that must be addressed.
The first point is that experience has shown that the Americans, due to their imperialistic attitude and arrogance, are unwilling to negotiate or reach a fair agreement. Therefore, wisdom dictates that officials, media, and the public should avoid any kind of premature optimism. Such optimism or even excessive hope could send the wrong message to the enemy and unnecessarily put additional pressure on the Iranian negotiating team.
The second point is that if a deal is eventually reached between the two countries, it will not solve Iran’s economic problems. Relying on an external agreement, especially one with an unreliable party like the U.S., is akin to placing hope in “imaginary points.” Solving the country’s economic problems requires continuous and deep efforts from the authorities, with the support of the people. About a decade ago, during the negotiations leading to the JCPOA, Iran suffered significant losses in this area. Overemphasizing the issue and tying both minor and major decisions to the outcome of negotiations led to tremendous damage and turned the 2010s into a decade of lessons. It is neither wise nor appropriate to repeat the same mistakes and bear the same enormous costs. Any oversimplification about the negotiations and their potential economic outcomes is harmful and toxic. Saturday, at best, will mark the beginning of a difficult and winding path; unity and cohesion will be needed on this journey.
Safeguarding Public Opinion
Another important point is that Trump has shown that he is playing a special game with public opinion when it comes to Iran and has personally entered the field. With the start of the negotiations in Oman, it is highly likely that this media and psychological game will intensify. In such conditions, officials must prepare for this situation and, with creativity, courage, and wisdom, disrupt the opponent’s game and take the initiative, rather than being passive players simply reacting to the situation. The public must also be aware that the country and its officials—especially the negotiating team—are facing very specific and complex circumstances, as the enemy is attempting to cast doubt on the officials and spread various doubts with different objectives.
🔹@enemywatch
(3/3):
Two Serious Warnings:
In any case, the indirect negotiations between Iran and the U.S. will begin next Saturday in Oman, and for now, the Islamic Republic of Iran holds the upper hand. However, there are two very important and serious points that must be addressed.
The first point is that experience has shown that the Americans, due to their imperialistic attitude and arrogance, are unwilling to negotiate or reach a fair agreement. Therefore, wisdom dictates that officials, media, and the public should avoid any kind of premature optimism. Such optimism or even excessive hope could send the wrong message to the enemy and unnecessarily put additional pressure on the Iranian negotiating team.
The second point is that if a deal is eventually reached between the two countries, it will not solve Iran’s economic problems. Relying on an external agreement, especially one with an unreliable party like the U.S., is akin to placing hope in “imaginary points.” Solving the country’s economic problems requires continuous and deep efforts from the authorities, with the support of the people. About a decade ago, during the negotiations leading to the JCPOA, Iran suffered significant losses in this area. Overemphasizing the issue and tying both minor and major decisions to the outcome of negotiations led to tremendous damage and turned the 2010s into a decade of lessons. It is neither wise nor appropriate to repeat the same mistakes and bear the same enormous costs. Any oversimplification about the negotiations and their potential economic outcomes is harmful and toxic. Saturday, at best, will mark the beginning of a difficult and winding path; unity and cohesion will be needed on this journey.
Safeguarding Public Opinion
Another important point is that Trump has shown that he is playing a special game with public opinion when it comes to Iran and has personally entered the field. With the start of the negotiations in Oman, it is highly likely that this media and psychological game will intensify. In such conditions, officials must prepare for this situation and, with creativity, courage, and wisdom, disrupt the opponent’s game and take the initiative, rather than being passive players simply reacting to the situation. The public must also be aware that the country and its officials—especially the negotiating team—are facing very specific and complex circumstances, as the enemy is attempting to cast doubt on the officials and spread various doubts with different objectives.
🔹@enemywatch
❤19💯8
Forwarded from NEW WORLD ORDYR 313 (0 EIE)
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😡58
🇮🇷:🇴🇲 Breaking: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi handed over the Islamic Republic’s core positions and demands to his Omani counterpart, Badr al-Busaidi, to be conveyed to the U.S. side.
The meeting comes ahead of indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington, with Oman once again acting as a key intermediary.
🔹@enemywatch
The meeting comes ahead of indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington, with Oman once again acting as a key intermediary.
🔹@enemywatch
🙏24🕊3😱2🤝1
Forwarded from AlHaq News | English - Middle East & Geopolitics (Al Musafir)
بِسْمِ ٱللَّٰهِ ٱلرَّحْمَٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ
Dear Valued Members,
We are absolutely thrilled and deeply grateful to announce that our Telegram channel dedicated to discussions and news surrounding the Middle East has reached a remarkable milestone 10,000 members!
This incredible achievement is a testament to your unwavering interest, insightful contributions, and the strong community we have built together. We started this channel with the aim of fostering informed discussions and sharing relevant information, and reaching this number is truly inspiring.
Your engagement, thoughtful comments, shared perspectives, and the respectful environment you've helped create are what make this channel a valuable space. We appreciate each and every one of you for being a part of this journey.
As a small token of our gratitude, and in the spirit of sharing valuable information within our area of interest, we wanted to personally recommend a few other Telegram channels that you might find insightful and beneficial:
@FotrosResistancee
@Middle_East_Spectator
@BasiraPress
@NewWorldOrdyr
@GeoPWatch
@RezistanceTrench
@VanessaBeeley
@TheSimurgh313
@EnemyWatch
@Resistancetoast
@DEQNEWS
@Based_Squad
@Alumami
Please note: These are just personal recommendations based on what we have found informative. We encourage you to explore them and decide for yourselves if they align with your interests.
Thank you once again for being such an integral part of our community. We look forward to continuing this journey with you, fostering more insightful discussions, and growing together.
With sincere gratitude,
The Admin Team
@AlHaqNews
Dear Valued Members,
We are absolutely thrilled and deeply grateful to announce that our Telegram channel dedicated to discussions and news surrounding the Middle East has reached a remarkable milestone 10,000 members!
This incredible achievement is a testament to your unwavering interest, insightful contributions, and the strong community we have built together. We started this channel with the aim of fostering informed discussions and sharing relevant information, and reaching this number is truly inspiring.
Your engagement, thoughtful comments, shared perspectives, and the respectful environment you've helped create are what make this channel a valuable space. We appreciate each and every one of you for being a part of this journey.
As a small token of our gratitude, and in the spirit of sharing valuable information within our area of interest, we wanted to personally recommend a few other Telegram channels that you might find insightful and beneficial:
@FotrosResistancee
@Middle_East_Spectator
@BasiraPress
@NewWorldOrdyr
@GeoPWatch
@RezistanceTrench
@VanessaBeeley
@TheSimurgh313
@EnemyWatch
@Resistancetoast
@DEQNEWS
@Based_Squad
@Alumami
Please note: These are just personal recommendations based on what we have found informative. We encourage you to explore them and decide for yourselves if they align with your interests.
Thank you once again for being such an integral part of our community. We look forward to continuing this journey with you, fostering more insightful discussions, and growing together.
With sincere gratitude,
The Admin Team
@AlHaqNews
🙏25❤7💯5
🇮🇷 Breaking: Imam Khamenei’s Office Slams NYT Report as Psychological Warfare:
Mr. Mahdi Fazaeli, a prominent member of the Office for the Publication of Imam Khamenei’s Works, has responded to the false claims published by The New York Times, which alleged that senior Iranian officials, including the heads of the three branches of power, pressured Imam Khamenei to reverse his opposition to direct negotiations with the United States.
Mr: Fazaeli denounced the report as a complete fabrication and a psychological operation aimed at manipulating public perception and undermining Iran’s internal political structure.
The same false narrative was initially pushed by the Times of Israel nearly 19 hours earlier and then amplified by The New York Times, exposing a coordinated media campaign.
#MediaTerrorism
#FakeNews
🔹@enemywatch
Mr. Mahdi Fazaeli, a prominent member of the Office for the Publication of Imam Khamenei’s Works, has responded to the false claims published by The New York Times, which alleged that senior Iranian officials, including the heads of the three branches of power, pressured Imam Khamenei to reverse his opposition to direct negotiations with the United States.
Mr: Fazaeli denounced the report as a complete fabrication and a psychological operation aimed at manipulating public perception and undermining Iran’s internal political structure.
The same false narrative was initially pushed by the Times of Israel nearly 19 hours earlier and then amplified by The New York Times, exposing a coordinated media campaign.
#MediaTerrorism
#FakeNews
🔹@enemywatch
🙏29💯10❤7
🇮🇷 Report: Disagreements Among U.S. Officials: A Sign of a Hollow Process?
While indirect talks are ongoing in Oman, their value is being questioned, especially after commentary published in Kayhan—a newspaper known for reflecting the views of the Office of Imam Khamenei. According to that perspective, Iran has made its positions entirely clear, maintains the upper hand, and is approaching the process with transparency and honesty. In contrast, U.S. behavior is seen as non-serious and deliberately time-wasting.
Reports indicate the American side is plagued by internal divisions, with no unified strategy or clear intention for constructive engagement. According to Tasnim News Agency, there are sharp disagreements among top U.S. officials on how to handle Iran—splitting the American leadership into two rival camps.
One faction, led by Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, believes Washington should offer Iran economic and security incentives to encourage Tehran to accept more nuclear constraints. Witkoff’s group argues that building mutual trust is essential for any meaningful outcome.
The other, more hardline group, led by Senator Marco Rubio and backed by staunch pro-Israel elements, advocates a rigid, no-compromise stance—pushing for maximalist demands coupled with threats. They believe any sign of flexibility will be perceived as weakness and exploited by Iran.
Witkoff and his team warn that this uncompromising posture could backfire, triggering a strong Iranian reaction and potentially derailing the entire negotiation process. From Tehran’s viewpoint, these internal American divisions only reinforce the belief that Washington lacks seriousness and unity, reducing the talks in Muscat to a diplomatic formality with no real substance.
🔹@enemywatch
While indirect talks are ongoing in Oman, their value is being questioned, especially after commentary published in Kayhan—a newspaper known for reflecting the views of the Office of Imam Khamenei. According to that perspective, Iran has made its positions entirely clear, maintains the upper hand, and is approaching the process with transparency and honesty. In contrast, U.S. behavior is seen as non-serious and deliberately time-wasting.
Reports indicate the American side is plagued by internal divisions, with no unified strategy or clear intention for constructive engagement. According to Tasnim News Agency, there are sharp disagreements among top U.S. officials on how to handle Iran—splitting the American leadership into two rival camps.
One faction, led by Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, believes Washington should offer Iran economic and security incentives to encourage Tehran to accept more nuclear constraints. Witkoff’s group argues that building mutual trust is essential for any meaningful outcome.
The other, more hardline group, led by Senator Marco Rubio and backed by staunch pro-Israel elements, advocates a rigid, no-compromise stance—pushing for maximalist demands coupled with threats. They believe any sign of flexibility will be perceived as weakness and exploited by Iran.
Witkoff and his team warn that this uncompromising posture could backfire, triggering a strong Iranian reaction and potentially derailing the entire negotiation process. From Tehran’s viewpoint, these internal American divisions only reinforce the belief that Washington lacks seriousness and unity, reducing the talks in Muscat to a diplomatic formality with no real substance.
🔹@enemywatch
💯22❤5
✅ | The news reported by AFP, in which a Hezbollah official supposedly said that Hezbollah would hand over its sites to the Lebanese army, is fake as AFP itself.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤28🙏4💯3
🇮🇷 Breaking: The first round of indirect talks between Iran and the United States has concluded.
Initial reports describe the atmosphere as positive, but contrary to circulating rumors, no direct face-to-face meeting took place between the two delegations.
Both parties have now left the venue, and discussions are expected to continue through indirect channels.
🔹@enemywatch
Initial reports describe the atmosphere as positive, but contrary to circulating rumors, no direct face-to-face meeting took place between the two delegations.
Both parties have now left the venue, and discussions are expected to continue through indirect channels.
🔹@enemywatch
🙏14💯5🕊1
⚠️ Beware:
Beware of false news, fabricated reports, and false flags circulating around the recent Iran-U.S. negotiations.
🔹@enemywatch
Beware of false news, fabricated reports, and false flags circulating around the recent Iran-U.S. negotiations.
🔹@enemywatch
💯25❤2
🇵🇸 Breaking: Reports indicate that the stoppage of the war in Gaza and the withdrawal of Zionist forces from the West Bank were included on the list of topics discussed during the indirect talks between Iran and the United States.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🤝20🙏9❤1