✅ Another statement from the Yemeni Armed Forces in a short while.
🙏14❤6
Forwarded from NEW WORLD ORDYR 313 (0 EIE)
🇶🇦🇮🇷 | The Iranian woman who spread propaganda against the Islamic Republic, encouraging riots and chaos by misleading Iranians was actually a contributor to the Qatari Shia hating al-Jazeera, a media known for opposing Islamic Republic of Iran and carrying lot of bias against Iran
🔹 This explains the undermining tendencies of her, spread of propaganda, misleading and lying by omission on purpose
🟡 @NEWWORLDORDYR | Mirror Channel
🔹 This explains the undermining tendencies of her, spread of propaganda, misleading and lying by omission on purpose
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😡36
Forwarded from NEW WORLD ORDYR 313 (🇮🇷 Rydro ☫ عباس 🕋⚔️)
Former al-Jazeera contributor, Fereshteh Sadeghi response to our post and post of others:
Verbal attacks are nowhere as bad as real physical attacks that the people and security forces had to endure and deal with due to enemy's propaganda and misleading narrative, from the feminist riots to whatever you are trying to stir today to undermine the Islamic Republic
I am never against taking local news and making them global to more people, but when it's a topic that you know the enemy will exploit, then be truthful and not resort to misleading information to allow the enemy to easily exploit it for its own benefit, but rather give the whole context, why giving room for the enemy to exploit what is happening? Especially when it is misleading and not true? "Reports say", same "reports" about Mahsa Amini and the riots that followed her death? Are we really just going to say "an anonymous source" or "reports say" and then build a whole narrative about it?
It was illegal sit-in, the woman herself is suicidal, from her own words. That itself takes away credibility as it shows the mental stability of a person, how can anyone advocate for Islamic law while threatening with suicide and self haram? That is haram and we all know it.
Covering up local news and anything related to IR with pessimism will not be constructive, rather a helping a hand to the enemy and strengthening the fifth column
Also based on the screenshots, no one called you Jew. It's just that you took an internal matter, and reported it in a misleading way, making it possible for it to get picked up by the enemy to magnify the matter much more and soon we may even get a hijabi Mahsa Amini
Honestly, everyone shouldn't expect much from a former al-Jazeera contributor, we know their hostility toward the Islamic Republic, for them to accept you in first place, that is suspicious to me, we know they won't accept pro IR/Hezb and the real Shia resistance that puts its most effort into the cause, but rather promote wahhabism and takfirism, misses no chance to undermine the IR. We know al-Jazeera true intentions are never in favor of IR, nor the Shias as a whole. But that is my personal opinion
🟡 @NEWWORLDORDYR | Mirror Channel
"I am verbally attacked by some English accounts and Farsi ones (Reformist & Conservatives alike!)
And am accused of being a Jew, a Baha’i, a Zionist agent, a Türkiye intelligence agent, etc.
Reason? covering Iranian domestic issues, something I’ve been doing all these years."
Verbal attacks are nowhere as bad as real physical attacks that the people and security forces had to endure and deal with due to enemy's propaganda and misleading narrative, from the feminist riots to whatever you are trying to stir today to undermine the Islamic Republic
I am never against taking local news and making them global to more people, but when it's a topic that you know the enemy will exploit, then be truthful and not resort to misleading information to allow the enemy to easily exploit it for its own benefit, but rather give the whole context, why giving room for the enemy to exploit what is happening? Especially when it is misleading and not true? "Reports say", same "reports" about Mahsa Amini and the riots that followed her death? Are we really just going to say "an anonymous source" or "reports say" and then build a whole narrative about it?
It was illegal sit-in, the woman herself is suicidal, from her own words. That itself takes away credibility as it shows the mental stability of a person, how can anyone advocate for Islamic law while threatening with suicide and self haram? That is haram and we all know it.
Covering up local news and anything related to IR with pessimism will not be constructive, rather a helping a hand to the enemy and strengthening the fifth column
Also based on the screenshots, no one called you Jew. It's just that you took an internal matter, and reported it in a misleading way, making it possible for it to get picked up by the enemy to magnify the matter much more and soon we may even get a hijabi Mahsa Amini
Honestly, everyone shouldn't expect much from a former al-Jazeera contributor, we know their hostility toward the Islamic Republic, for them to accept you in first place, that is suspicious to me, we know they won't accept pro IR/Hezb and the real Shia resistance that puts its most effort into the cause, but rather promote wahhabism and takfirism, misses no chance to undermine the IR. We know al-Jazeera true intentions are never in favor of IR, nor the Shias as a whole. But that is my personal opinion
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤12💯4
🇸🇾 Report: Julani’s ‘New Syrian Government’: A Mask for Extremist Control and Continued massacre and assault: (1/2):
The presence of various terrorist factions inside Syria has significantly impacted the ongoing conflict, contributing to widespread violence and instability. Julani, once a prominent member of Al-Qaeda and later affiliated with ISIS, has used his position to form a so-called “New Syrian Government,” which critics argue is nothing more than a mockery of governance, designed to maintain control over the region under the guise of reform and national recovery.
The report delves into the disturbing ideology of Julani’s regime, with particular focus on the use of jihadist rhetoric in the educational system. In areas controlled by HTS, children are taught from Al-Qaeda-affiliated texts that reinforce extreme interpretations of Islam, thus ensuring the continuation of violent ideologies among the next generation. This serves not only as a means of control but also as a method of indoctrinating the population into Julani’s vision of governance, which remains firmly rooted in jihadist principles.
The terrorist factions mobilized within Syria extend beyond the borders of the country, drawing in foreign militants from across the globe. These groups include the Sunni Muhajireen Movement from Iran, the Caucasus Brigade from Russia, the Uzbek Brigade from Uzbekistan, the Turkestan Islamic Party from China, and a number of other smaller groups from various regions such as Morocco, Tajikistan, Albania, Pakistan, and Azerbaijan. These foreign brigades, including the notorious Uyghur Brigade, add to the complexity of the conflict, complicating any prospects for peace or reconciliation within Syria.
Julani’s “New Syrian Government” claims to be a step toward institutional reform, yet it seems designed to solidify his control over the region. The appointments in his government reflect a narrow and ideologically extreme circle, with a few token minority representatives, but without any meaningful effort at inclusivity. The minority populations, such as the Ismaili Shiites, continue to be marginalized under this new regime. The government’s ministers, many with ties to past militant activity, further underline the lack of genuine commitment to rebuilding Syria as a unified and democratic state.
One of the most notable contradictions in this formation is the appointment of Hind Kabawat, a former critic of HTS, to the role of Minister of Social Affairs. Kabawat had previously condemned HTS and its brutal tactics, stating that both the Assad regime and HTS were equally destructive forces in Syria. Her appointment to a high government position raises serious questions about her true stance, and whether her earlier criticisms were genuine or part of a larger strategy to gain credibility for Julani’s government among those seeking reform.
Another concerning issue is the appointment of recycled regime officials, such as Economy Minister Nidal al-Shaar and Transport Minister Yarub Badr, both of whom had served in Syria’s government before the conflict began in 2011. While al-Shaar was known to oppose Assad’s policies, he did not align himself with the opposition, and this indicates a preference for non-partisan technocrats over ideologically-driven figures. This further suggests that Julani’s government is attempting to distance itself from extremism by appealing to the international community, particularly those in the West, by installing professionals with Western credentials.
🔹@enemywatch
+
The presence of various terrorist factions inside Syria has significantly impacted the ongoing conflict, contributing to widespread violence and instability. Julani, once a prominent member of Al-Qaeda and later affiliated with ISIS, has used his position to form a so-called “New Syrian Government,” which critics argue is nothing more than a mockery of governance, designed to maintain control over the region under the guise of reform and national recovery.
The report delves into the disturbing ideology of Julani’s regime, with particular focus on the use of jihadist rhetoric in the educational system. In areas controlled by HTS, children are taught from Al-Qaeda-affiliated texts that reinforce extreme interpretations of Islam, thus ensuring the continuation of violent ideologies among the next generation. This serves not only as a means of control but also as a method of indoctrinating the population into Julani’s vision of governance, which remains firmly rooted in jihadist principles.
The terrorist factions mobilized within Syria extend beyond the borders of the country, drawing in foreign militants from across the globe. These groups include the Sunni Muhajireen Movement from Iran, the Caucasus Brigade from Russia, the Uzbek Brigade from Uzbekistan, the Turkestan Islamic Party from China, and a number of other smaller groups from various regions such as Morocco, Tajikistan, Albania, Pakistan, and Azerbaijan. These foreign brigades, including the notorious Uyghur Brigade, add to the complexity of the conflict, complicating any prospects for peace or reconciliation within Syria.
Julani’s “New Syrian Government” claims to be a step toward institutional reform, yet it seems designed to solidify his control over the region. The appointments in his government reflect a narrow and ideologically extreme circle, with a few token minority representatives, but without any meaningful effort at inclusivity. The minority populations, such as the Ismaili Shiites, continue to be marginalized under this new regime. The government’s ministers, many with ties to past militant activity, further underline the lack of genuine commitment to rebuilding Syria as a unified and democratic state.
One of the most notable contradictions in this formation is the appointment of Hind Kabawat, a former critic of HTS, to the role of Minister of Social Affairs. Kabawat had previously condemned HTS and its brutal tactics, stating that both the Assad regime and HTS were equally destructive forces in Syria. Her appointment to a high government position raises serious questions about her true stance, and whether her earlier criticisms were genuine or part of a larger strategy to gain credibility for Julani’s government among those seeking reform.
Another concerning issue is the appointment of recycled regime officials, such as Economy Minister Nidal al-Shaar and Transport Minister Yarub Badr, both of whom had served in Syria’s government before the conflict began in 2011. While al-Shaar was known to oppose Assad’s policies, he did not align himself with the opposition, and this indicates a preference for non-partisan technocrats over ideologically-driven figures. This further suggests that Julani’s government is attempting to distance itself from extremism by appealing to the international community, particularly those in the West, by installing professionals with Western credentials.
🔹@enemywatch
+
💯1
Enemy Watch — Official
🇸🇾 Report: Julani’s ‘New Syrian Government’: A Mask for Extremist Control and Continued massacre and assault: (1/2): The presence of various terrorist factions inside Syria has significantly impacted the ongoing conflict, contributing to widespread violence…
+
(2/2):
Despite the inclusion of a few technocrats and Western-educated ministers, the influence of religious bodies within the government cannot be ignored.
Two members of the Supreme Islamic Jurisprudence Council have been appointed to key positions, including Minister of Endowments and Minister of Justice, signaling a strong religious presence in the areas of law and morality. This shows that Julani’s government still clings to its extremist foundations, despite efforts to appear more secular and pragmatic to outsiders.
The creation of new ministries, such as the Ministry of Sports and Youth, appears to be an attempt to appeal to younger generations and soften the militant image of the regime. Similarly, structural changes, such as the merging of oil, gas, and electricity ministries into a single Ministry of Energy, are portrayed as efforts to streamline governance. However, these changes seem more like cosmetic adjustments rather than substantive reforms aimed at improving the lives of ordinary Syrians.
One of the most concerning appointments is that of Anas al-Khattab, a former intelligence chief who has been linked to Al-Qaeda by the United Nations. As Minister of the Interior, it remains unclear whether al-Khattab will retain influence over Syria’s intelligence operations or whether a new figure will take over his duties. This appointment highlights the extent to which Julani’s government remains beholden to extremist elements, despite its claims of reform.
Overall, the formation of this “New Syrian Government” is little more than a facade designed to maintain the hold of HTS and its allies over parts of Syria. It masks militant control with the language of statehood and offers no real hope for the Syrian people who have suffered under years of war, displacement, and violence. With the continued presence of foreign militants and extremist ideology at the core of this regime, it is unlikely that Syria will see any meaningful recovery or progress toward peace in the foreseeable future.
🔹@enemywatch
(2/2):
Despite the inclusion of a few technocrats and Western-educated ministers, the influence of religious bodies within the government cannot be ignored.
Two members of the Supreme Islamic Jurisprudence Council have been appointed to key positions, including Minister of Endowments and Minister of Justice, signaling a strong religious presence in the areas of law and morality. This shows that Julani’s government still clings to its extremist foundations, despite efforts to appear more secular and pragmatic to outsiders.
The creation of new ministries, such as the Ministry of Sports and Youth, appears to be an attempt to appeal to younger generations and soften the militant image of the regime. Similarly, structural changes, such as the merging of oil, gas, and electricity ministries into a single Ministry of Energy, are portrayed as efforts to streamline governance. However, these changes seem more like cosmetic adjustments rather than substantive reforms aimed at improving the lives of ordinary Syrians.
One of the most concerning appointments is that of Anas al-Khattab, a former intelligence chief who has been linked to Al-Qaeda by the United Nations. As Minister of the Interior, it remains unclear whether al-Khattab will retain influence over Syria’s intelligence operations or whether a new figure will take over his duties. This appointment highlights the extent to which Julani’s government remains beholden to extremist elements, despite its claims of reform.
Overall, the formation of this “New Syrian Government” is little more than a facade designed to maintain the hold of HTS and its allies over parts of Syria. It masks militant control with the language of statehood and offers no real hope for the Syrian people who have suffered under years of war, displacement, and violence. With the continued presence of foreign militants and extremist ideology at the core of this regime, it is unlikely that Syria will see any meaningful recovery or progress toward peace in the foreseeable future.
🔹@enemywatch
💯1
🇵🇸 Report: Results of a Survey Conducted by the “Echo Social” Digital Rights Center:
• 80% of journalists in the Gaza Strip who participated in the survey were directly targeted by the Israeli occupation while performing their press duties, with 87.5% of these attacks occurring during field coverage.
• 68.8% received death threats, while 50% faced threats of arrest.
• 25% were targeted in their homes, and 18.8% at the headquarters of their media institutions.
• 70% of journalists have been subjected to online harassment and misleading accusations.
• 55% were targets of digital incitement campaigns that encouraged violence against them.
• 26.3% received threats via phone calls, while 21.1% were threatened on social media.
• 90% of the media institutions employing these journalists were either directly targeted or threatened.
• 68.8% confirmed that targeting impacted their ability to cover events.
🔹@enemywatch
• 80% of journalists in the Gaza Strip who participated in the survey were directly targeted by the Israeli occupation while performing their press duties, with 87.5% of these attacks occurring during field coverage.
• 68.8% received death threats, while 50% faced threats of arrest.
• 25% were targeted in their homes, and 18.8% at the headquarters of their media institutions.
• 70% of journalists have been subjected to online harassment and misleading accusations.
• 55% were targets of digital incitement campaigns that encouraged violence against them.
• 26.3% received threats via phone calls, while 21.1% were threatened on social media.
• 90% of the media institutions employing these journalists were either directly targeted or threatened.
• 68.8% confirmed that targeting impacted their ability to cover events.
🔹@enemywatch
😡12