I thought you might find this interesting. There's an entire list of such configurations on GitHub loaded with a complete paper full of mathematical explanations behind that phenomenon.
This is so stupid and useless, but I love it. It's just awesome.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€―43π5π€2β‘1β€1π€¬1π’1π€©1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€΅οΈ KomputerΕwiat.pl Downloading Timelapse
Taken down by YouTube on February 2nd, 2023. Likely forever. Original link: https://youtu.be/IKFhu1_2ho8
Downloading is very beneficial for your health. You must excel at downloading to succeed at life. Credit goes to PatRyk.
-- Message from PatRyk --
5 hours of pure downloading sped up into 4 minutes.
Komputer Εwiat was a magazine dedicated to technology. It came with DVD's which had a bunch of programs, as well as a code on them to redeem the magazines on their website. With the magazine added to your account, you could download software featured in said magazine.
They stopped making them half a year ago - on February 1st they shut down the website. Everything would be lost if I didn't save it, so I did. In fact, this video would've been 1/4 the size if not for a friend that shared his account that had stuff from 2012 and onwards added.
I may make this into a public archive soon, if I can manage to upload 500GB to some service.
https://malwarewatch.org
Taken down by YouTube on February 2nd, 2023. Likely forever. Original link: https://youtu.be/IKFhu1_2ho8
Downloading is very beneficial for your health. You must excel at downloading to succeed at life. Credit goes to PatRyk.
-- Message from PatRyk --
5 hours of pure downloading sped up into 4 minutes.
Komputer Εwiat was a magazine dedicated to technology. It came with DVD's which had a bunch of programs, as well as a code on them to redeem the magazines on their website. With the magazine added to your account, you could download software featured in said magazine.
They stopped making them half a year ago - on February 1st they shut down the website. Everything would be lost if I didn't save it, so I did. In fact, this video would've been 1/4 the size if not for a friend that shared his account that had stuff from 2012 and onwards added.
I may make this into a public archive soon, if I can manage to upload 500GB to some service.
https://malwarewatch.org
π€―22π9π’6β‘5β€4π€¬1
Enderman
β€΅οΈ KomputerΕwiat.pl Downloading Timelapse Taken down by YouTube on February 2nd, 2023. Likely forever. Original link: https://youtu.be/IKFhu1_2ho8 Downloading is very beneficial for your health. You must excel at downloading to succeed at life. Credit goesβ¦
My tweets:
https://twitter.com/endermanch/status/1621227493532340225?s=20
https://twitter.com/endermanch/status/1628746979059593216?s=20
https://twitter.com/endermanch/status/1632047642434850821?s=20
YouTube's ignorant responses:
https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1622678626972971008?s=20
https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1632000834262138882?s=20
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€¬35π€―7π’5π1
stickers.zip
14.6 MB
π http.cat stickers
Yesterday night I decided to make a Telegram version of http.cat status codes, as there wasn't a good sticker pack. Here is the source archive comprising a bunch of 512x512 images of funny cats representing HTTP status codes.
In case you want to use them, here's the link.
Yesterday night I decided to make a Telegram version of http.cat status codes, as there wasn't a good sticker pack. Here is the source archive comprising a bunch of 512x512 images of funny cats representing HTTP status codes.
In case you want to use them, here's the link.
π32β€18π€¬1
Enderman
They made a meme out of this π
π57β€12π€9π€¬2π1π’1
π Activating Windows 95 using ChatGPT - Final Thoughts
I guess I'm super late, but I still want to talk about it. My recent ChatGPT video gained lots of traction and someone at Tom's Hardware wrote an article about it. That's really cool!
Honestly, it's hard to believe I got noticed by such a respectable magazine. Since it's my first and I love listening to the feedback, I carefully watched the situation unfold and noticed a strong divide in the community:
βͺοΈ One side was unhappy, stating I cheated by feeding ChatGPT the key algorithm without ever supplying it the context.
βͺοΈ The other side was generally happy and was already preparing for a ChatGPT HWIDGEN for Windows 10/11.
Point being, I believe both of these views lie on each end of the same spectrum, and I'm not sure at all, which one can be considered truthful. Personally, I believe making ChatGPT generate a product key using a predefined algorithm is something the companies should work against, as the AI didn't suspect anything from the very beginning when I prompted it to generate a "simple string". Using this method we can certainly circumvent it to generate a Windows XP key, which Microsoft would absolutely dislike. It's just nobody wants to bother to look through the Windows XP source code yet.
Now again, it doesn't matter that we know the algorithm, what matters is the fact the AI doesn't detect it as suspicious, that we, as users, prompt it to generate a string looking rather similar to a product key.
Either way, these are my thoughts on the subject, if you're a fan of wearing pink glasses waiting for a HWIDGEN (which won't be possible at all until we at least reverse the Windows XP algorithm), vote π, or if you're pessimistic about this whole thing, thinking I could execute the video better, vote π€. If you just don't care enough and you loved the video, go with β€οΈ.
Please be fair in your judgment, I want actual feedback. It doesn't offend me if I really missed out on an opportunity to make my video more entertaining. That's how we all learn!
I guess I'm super late, but I still want to talk about it. My recent ChatGPT video gained lots of traction and someone at Tom's Hardware wrote an article about it. That's really cool!
Honestly, it's hard to believe I got noticed by such a respectable magazine. Since it's my first and I love listening to the feedback, I carefully watched the situation unfold and noticed a strong divide in the community:
βͺοΈ One side was unhappy, stating I cheated by feeding ChatGPT the key algorithm without ever supplying it the context.
βͺοΈ The other side was generally happy and was already preparing for a ChatGPT HWIDGEN for Windows 10/11.
Point being, I believe both of these views lie on each end of the same spectrum, and I'm not sure at all, which one can be considered truthful. Personally, I believe making ChatGPT generate a product key using a predefined algorithm is something the companies should work against, as the AI didn't suspect anything from the very beginning when I prompted it to generate a "simple string". Using this method we can certainly circumvent it to generate a Windows XP key, which Microsoft would absolutely dislike. It's just nobody wants to bother to look through the Windows XP source code yet.
Now again, it doesn't matter that we know the algorithm, what matters is the fact the AI doesn't detect it as suspicious, that we, as users, prompt it to generate a string looking rather similar to a product key.
Either way, these are my thoughts on the subject, if you're a fan of wearing pink glasses waiting for a HWIDGEN (which won't be possible at all until we at least reverse the Windows XP algorithm), vote π, or if you're pessimistic about this whole thing, thinking I could execute the video better, vote π€. If you just don't care enough and you loved the video, go with β€οΈ.
Please be fair in your judgment, I want actual feedback. It doesn't offend me if I really missed out on an opportunity to make my video more entertaining. That's how we all learn!
Tom's Hardware
YouTuber Tricks ChatGPT Into Generating Windows 95 Keys
Even with the oldest obsolete software, ChatGPT will reject direct key requests.
π75β€44π11π€1π€¬1