Cooking oil linked to aggressive breast cancer
https://nypost.com/2025/04/16/lifestyle/cooking-oil-linked-to-aggressive-breast-cancer/

Irish Freemasons apologise for hosting Conor McGregor interview at Dublin hall | Conor McGregor | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/apr/21/ireland-freemasons-apologise-hosting-conor-mcgregor-interview-tucker-carlson

Tucker Carlson Tonight 03-12-2021
#TuckerCarlson #FlashBack

They’re Lying To You About Controlling The Weather!

https://rumble.com/v6si8iv-theyre-lying-to-you-about-controlling-the-weather.html

Here are the key points from the April 28, 2025, interview between Tucker Carlson and Catherine Austin Fitts:

1. Financial Coup and Missing Money: Fitts claims that starting in 1997, a financial coup began, with $21 trillion in undocumented adjustments disappearing from U.S. government accounts (primarily HUD and DOD) by 2015. She suggests this money was siphoned off to fund a parallel "breakaway civilization" or secret projects, including underground bases.

2. Control Grid and Digital Prison: Fitts describes a global effort by central bankers to implement a digital control grid, transitioning currency into a control system. This involves AI, surveillance, and digital currencies to enforce rules, restrict movement, and control individuals, as exemplified by the Canadian truckers' bank accounts being frozen.

3. Underground Bases and Extinction Events: Fitts alleges the construction of 170 underground bases and transportation systems in the U.S. and globally, potentially to prepare for a near-extinction event (e.g., solar minimum, geophysical risks) or to support secret programs like space exploration.

4. Central Bankers and Sovereign Immunity: The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland, is described as a central hub with sovereign immunity, enabling secret financial transactions. Fitts suggests central bankers, not governments, drive these changes, aiming to control fiscal and monetary policy.

5. Globalization and Cultural Decline: Fitts references Sir James Goldsmith’s 1994 warning that globalization would hollow out the Western middle class and devastate culture. She argues that leaders knowingly pursued this to centralize capital, possibly for space exploration or a global reset.

6. Breakthrough Energy: Fitts believes undisclosed, advanced energy technologies exist and are used in secret projects. She suggests their controlled use could mitigate economic downturns but is withheld to maintain control and prevent weaponization.

7. Debt as a Symptom: The U.S. debt crisis is a symptom of a non-economic model involving poisoning (literal and figurative) of the population, inflating healthcare costs, and centralizing wealth. Fitts argues this could lead to a drastic reduction in living standards unless addressed.

8. The Red Button Story: In a 2000 speech, Fitts asked a spiritually focused audience if they would push a button to stop narcotics trafficking, knowing it could disrupt the economy. Only one of 100 would, highlighting complicity in corrupt systems for financial security.

9. People Bank and True Wealth: Fitts emphasizes investing in relationships and community (the "people bank") over financial systems. True wealth integrates living equity (health, family, culture) with financial equity, prioritizing risk management and decentralized power.

10. Spiritual and Cultural Solutions: Fitts frames the struggle as a spiritual war, advocating for a culture that embraces divine principles, decentralizes power, and rejects hopelessness. She believes freedom requires collective action and facing uncomfortable truths.

11. Harvard Endowment and Intergenerational Capital: Fitts points to the Harvard Corporation as a powerful, tax-exempt investment syndicate, hinting at a broader network of intergenerational capital pools controlling global finance, though their true owners remain elusive.

12. Personal Resilience: Despite facing 11 years of litigation and harassment from the Department of Justice, Fitts maintained her joy and resilience, crediting spiritual training and a refusal to succumb to despair.

Fitts encourages further exploration of her work at solari.com, where she publishes research and fosters a subscriber network focused on freedom and decentralized solutions.

https://t.iss.one/TuckerTonight/6250

Underground basis worldwide

https://t.iss.one/TuckerTonight/6252

Lmfao 🤣

"The Harvard Corporation: Wealth, Influence, and Political Power"

The Harvard Corporation (officially The President and Fellows of Harvard College) is the oldest governing board of Harvard University. It isn't a corporation like a business; it's a private nonprofit that oversees Harvard's finances, property, and overall direction. Here’s a breakdown of what it owns and its political power:

### What the Harvard Corporation "owns":
- Harvard University’s assets, including:
- Harvard’s $50+ billion endowment (as of 2024, it fluctuates yearly).
- Real estate across Cambridge, Boston, Allston (Massachusetts), and globally.
- Buildings and intellectual property developed through Harvard’s schools (e.g., patents, research rights, trademarks).
- Investment holdings in private equity, hedge funds, venture capital, real estate funds, and natural resources (such as timberlands and farmland).
- Through its endowment and investment management (via Harvard Management Company), it owns stakes indirectly in:
- Tech companies
- Energy companies
- Real estate developments
- International infrastructure projects

### Harvard Corporation’s Political Power:
- Educational influence: Harvard shapes policymaking globally because it educates a huge number of political, economic, and media leaders. Examples:
- Presidents (e.g., Barack Obama, George W. Bush at Harvard Business School)
- Supreme Court justices (e.g., many recent ones are Harvard Law graduates)
- CEOs of major companies (e.g., tech, finance)
- Think tanks and advisors: Harvard faculty and research centers (like the Kennedy School of Government) influence U.S. and international policy.
- Lobbying: While Harvard itself does not heavily lobby like corporations, it quietly uses academic clout and legal challenges (especially on immigration, education policy, and scientific research funding) to shape laws and regulations.
- Financial influence: Harvard’s investments (especially through its fund managers) create leverage over industries — though this is indirect rather than political in the traditional sense.
- Network influence: Its alumni network is extremely powerful in:
- Government (e.g., Cabinet members, intelligence officials)
- Media (editors, journalists at The New York Times, Washington Post)
- Law firms and corporations

---

In short:
The Harvard Corporation itself doesn't run political campaigns or directly "control" politics. But through money, education, real estate, research, and alumni, it has deep structural influence over politics, finance, media, and global policy — far more than many official political organizations.

"Stanford University: Silicon Valley’s Power Broker in Politics and Wealth"

---

# The Stanford Board of Trustees: Wealth, Influence, and Political Power

What the Stanford Board "owns" and controls:
- Stanford University’s massive assets, including:
- An endowment exceeding $40 billion (as of 2024), one of the largest in the world.
- Extensive real estate holdings, especially in Silicon Valley and the Bay Area — Stanford owns over 8,000 acres of extremely valuable land.
- Research facilities like SLAC (Stanford Linear Accelerator Center) and many bioengineering, computer science, and AI labs.
- Intellectual property — patents and tech spinoffs that have created companies like Google, Cisco, Yahoo, and countless biotech startups.
- Venture Capital connections — Stanford has financial ties to VC firms through alumni and institutional investments.

Through its endowment and management, Stanford indirectly owns stakes in:
- Startups across Silicon Valley
- Major tech companies
- Biomedical research corporations
- Energy and infrastructure projects

---

Stanford’s Political Power:
- Educational pipeline: Stanford trains large numbers of:
- Tech entrepreneurs (founders of Google, Yahoo, Instagram, etc.)
- Political advisors (especially in cybersecurity, AI policy, foreign policy)
- Business leaders (Silicon Valley executives, investment bankers)
- Government consulting and research influence:
- Stanford’s think tanks — like Hoover Institution and Center for International Security and Cooperation — have direct pipelines into Washington policymaking.
- It has deep ties to the U.S. intelligence community, defense contractors, and cybersecurity agencies.
- Lobbying: While Stanford itself lobbies primarily for research funding (from NIH, NSF, DARPA), its ecosystem of spin-offs and alumni drives tech policy lobbying in Washington, D.C.
- Military and Defense Ties:
- Stanford historically participated in classified defense projects (especially during the Cold War) and continues to have partnerships with DoD.
- Research at Stanford feeds into advanced AI, cyberwarfare, and drone technology.
- Real estate and political influence in California:
- Stanford's land and wealth give it leverage in local politics (housing policy, infrastructure debates, environmental regulations).

---

In short:
Stanford University, like Harvard, is far more than a school: it's a wealth-generating, policy-shaping engine. It wields economic, technological, and political influence through its real estate empire, innovation networks, military contracts, and a powerfully connected alumni base.

Tucker Carlson Monday April 28, 2025

Catherine Fitts: Bankers vs. the West, Secret Underground Bases, and the Oncoming Extinction Event

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8pA2TDXtew