Spanish map of sites associated with the countryβs military orders (13th-14th century)
@illyrianometer
π7
Russia_Samara_EBA_Yamnaya, a Yamnaya sample from the Early Bronze Age in Samara, has a fascinating DNA breakdown as per qpAdm(not g25)
25.8% Eastern Hunter Gatherer πΉ
23.1% Caucasus Hunter Gatherer β°οΈπΉ
15.7% Ukraine Trypillian Culture πΎ
15% Western_Siberian_Hunter_Gatherer π²
11.8% Ukraine Eneolithic πΎ
8.6% Iran Neolithic πΎ
This Yamnaya sample is genetically close to Finnish Central populations
Research paper:- https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.17.589597v1.full
@illyrianometer
25.8% Eastern Hunter Gatherer πΉ
23.1% Caucasus Hunter Gatherer β°οΈπΉ
15.7% Ukraine Trypillian Culture πΎ
15% Western_Siberian_Hunter_Gatherer π²
11.8% Ukraine Eneolithic πΎ
8.6% Iran Neolithic πΎ
This Yamnaya sample is genetically close to Finnish Central populations
Research paper:- https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.17.589597v1.full
π€10π5β€3
Dna results of a central asian who is kazakh as per g25 (He is 1/16 tatar also)
56% proto turkic
23.6% proto indo european
13.2% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
3.4% Caucasus hunter gatherer
2.8% iran Neolithic
1% aasi
This sample is close to Karakalpak
@illyrianometer
56% proto turkic
23.6% proto indo european
13.2% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
3.4% Caucasus hunter gatherer
2.8% iran Neolithic
1% aasi
This sample is close to Karakalpak
π8π3
Armenian DNA, according to qpAdm, has this fascinating breakdown:
β’ Proto-Caucasian: 79% β°οΈ
β’ Levantine DNA: 12.9% π
β’ Proto-Indo-European: 8.2% πΉ
This mix reveals a complex ancestry, with strong ties to the Caucasus region and additional influences from the Levant and Indo-European migrations.
Armenians are genetically closest to Meskheti Georgians, highlighting their close ties with their neighbors in the Caucasus.
qpAdm model= https://justpaste.it/dyrm5
@illyrianometer
β’ Proto-Caucasian: 79% β°οΈ
β’ Levantine DNA: 12.9% π
β’ Proto-Indo-European: 8.2% πΉ
This mix reveals a complex ancestry, with strong ties to the Caucasus region and additional influences from the Levant and Indo-European migrations.
Armenians are genetically closest to Meskheti Georgians, highlighting their close ties with their neighbors in the Caucasus.
qpAdm model= https://justpaste.it/dyrm5
π14β€1
Israel Chalcolithic DNA, according to qpAdm, has this breakdown:
49% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer πΎ
38% Natufian πΎ
7.2% Iran Neolithic farmer πΎ
5.8% Caucasian hunter gatherer β°οΈπΉ
This sample is genetically closest to Samaritan , though not super close.
The Levant Chalcolithic had an increase in light eyes due to Anatolian Neolithic Farmer DNA πΎποΈ.
Source:-https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05649-9
@illyrianometer
49% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer πΎ
38% Natufian πΎ
7.2% Iran Neolithic farmer πΎ
5.8% Caucasian hunter gatherer β°οΈπΉ
This sample is genetically closest to Samaritan , though not super close.
The Levant Chalcolithic had an increase in light eyes due to Anatolian Neolithic Farmer DNA πΎποΈ.
Source:-https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05649-9
β€5π5
Beef and pork are french words brought by normans
Source:- Word Histories And Mysteries: From Abracadabra to Zeus
By Editors of the American Heritage Di
@illyrianometer
Source:- Word Histories And Mysteries: From Abracadabra to Zeus
By Editors of the American Heritage Di
π14
Indigenous North American DNA, according to qpAdm, has this breakdown:
70.8% East Eurasian π
29.2% Ancient Northern Eurasian (Hyperborean) π§
This sample is closest to Amerindians of North America π.
Model:-https://pastebin.com/4NebwpXC
@illyrianometer
70.8% East Eurasian π
29.2% Ancient Northern Eurasian (Hyperborean) π§
This sample is closest to Amerindians of North America π.
Model:-https://pastebin.com/4NebwpXC
π₯°10π6
In Baltic Traditions Jumis or JΔnis is the God of the harvest, nature's annual rebirth and fertility , which is closely connected with water and fire. He is symbolized by a double head of grain. He is the personification of natural fertility and at the same time its guardian and promoter.
@illyrianometer
π10β€1π₯1
As per research"Genetic continuity of Indo-Iranian speakers since the Iron Age in southern Central Asia" which component is absent in central asian dna
Anonymous Quiz
30%
Persian
17%
East asian
24%
European
29%
South asian
π3π€1
Czech_EarlySlav.SG π§¬, a Proto-Slavic sample, according to qpAdm, has this DNA breakdown:
49.5% Proto-Indo-European πΉ
31.9% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer πΎ
18.6% Western_Hunter_Gatherer πΆββοΈ
This sample is genetically closest to Polish people from Silesia π΅π±.
Attached hypothetical reconstruction showing Slavic phenotype.
@illyrianometer
49.5% Proto-Indo-European πΉ
31.9% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer πΎ
18.6% Western_Hunter_Gatherer πΆββοΈ
This sample is genetically closest to Polish people from Silesia π΅π±.
Attached hypothetical reconstruction showing Slavic phenotype.
π11π₯3π€2
Tatar_Mishar G25 breakdown 𧬠(can't use qpAdm π« because of lack of real Volga Oka samples π)
55% Balto-Slavic
21.6% Turkic
19% Uralic volga mix
4.4% West Caucasian ποΈ
They are genetically close to Tatar Kazans π
Book :-Peoples of the USSR: An Ethnographic Handbook π
By Ronald Wixman π¨βπ«
This book shows about admixture of Tatar Mishars π§¬
@illyrianometer
55% Balto-Slavic
21.6% Turkic
19% Uralic volga mix
4.4% West Caucasian ποΈ
They are genetically close to Tatar Kazans π
Book :-Peoples of the USSR: An Ethnographic Handbook π
By Ronald Wixman π¨βπ«
This book shows about admixture of Tatar Mishars π§¬
π12π€1
𧬠Tajik_Yaghobi DNA Breakdown π§¬
Turkmenistan Iron Age Avestan Proxy = 92.4%
Xiongnu East Eurasian Source = 7.4% π
Research paper: π https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943878/table/T5/?report=objectonly
For the Yaghnobis, the only model retained was the one with ~ 93β88% from Turkmenistan_IA and ~ 7β12% ancestry from XiongNu
@illyrianometer
Turkmenistan Iron Age Avestan Proxy = 92.4%
Xiongnu East Eurasian Source = 7.4% π
Research paper: π https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943878/table/T5/?report=objectonly
For the Yaghnobis, the only model retained was the one with ~ 93β88% from Turkmenistan_IA and ~ 7β12% ancestry from XiongNu
π₯12π1π€1
Natufians are proto semites.One can say they were ones who started overall semitism.
Natufian deep ancestry analysis
89.8% Caucasoid
10.2% archaic
Guess for modeling:-
The Natufian sample consisted of 61.2% Arabian, 21.2% Northern African, 10.9% Western Asian, and 6.8% Omotic ancestry
Source:- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062619/
@illyrianometer
Natufian deep ancestry analysis
89.8% Caucasoid
10.2% archaic
Guess for modeling:-
The Natufian sample consisted of 61.2% Arabian, 21.2% Northern African, 10.9% Western Asian, and 6.8% Omotic ancestry
Source:- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062619/
π8π4π€3