This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"If you say it, prove it. Where is it? Post it. Print it."
Del Bigtree calls out the hypocrisy loud and clear: Mainstream media tells us "trust the experts" and "the science is settled," but when challenged, they hide the evidence.
Meanwhile, The HighWire shows our work every week: full transcripts, sources, hyperlinks, everything. Just enter your email on the homepage (under "Brave Bold News"), and we send you the complete show—videos, articles, all of it. We don't share your info; it's our charter.
This is The HighWire Protocol: Total transparency. We demand the same from every network and news agency worldwide. If someone claims "placebo trials exist for childhood vaccines," show us the proof. Don't just assert—deliver. That's what real journalism looks like.
Watch the full clip below. We're putting the power back in your hands. If you think we're cherry-picking, call it out—we welcome it.
Who's ready for real transparency from legacy media?
@delbigtree
Del Bigtree calls out the hypocrisy loud and clear: Mainstream media tells us "trust the experts" and "the science is settled," but when challenged, they hide the evidence.
Meanwhile, The HighWire shows our work every week: full transcripts, sources, hyperlinks, everything. Just enter your email on the homepage (under "Brave Bold News"), and we send you the complete show—videos, articles, all of it. We don't share your info; it's our charter.
This is The HighWire Protocol: Total transparency. We demand the same from every network and news agency worldwide. If someone claims "placebo trials exist for childhood vaccines," show us the proof. Don't just assert—deliver. That's what real journalism looks like.
Watch the full clip below. We're putting the power back in your hands. If you think we're cherry-picking, call it out—we welcome it.
Who's ready for real transparency from legacy media?
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The FDA is supposed to protect our babies from toxins in food—but Florida had to do it themselves. And the results are alarming.
In this clip, Del Bigtree and Jefferey Jaxen react to a Florida Department of Health report: The state tested 24 infant formulas, and 16 contained at least one heavy metal (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium) above federal safety standards. Mercury was in all 16 positive samples, with three formulas showing three or more concerning results.
Del: "Was that not what the Food and Drug Administration was supposed to be doing all this time?"
The governor calls it the start of their "Exposing Food Toxins" initiative - independent testing for more products ahead. "We want people to be able to make the best decision for them."
This raises the big question: Why has the federal government failed to test baby formula for heavy metals before it hits shelves? Florida is stepping up where the FDA has fallen short, and it's a wake-up call for every parent. Mom's Across America started a relay, and Florida is grabbing the torch.
Watch the full reaction below. If this doesn't make you demand real oversight, what will?
@delbigtree
In this clip, Del Bigtree and Jefferey Jaxen react to a Florida Department of Health report: The state tested 24 infant formulas, and 16 contained at least one heavy metal (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium) above federal safety standards. Mercury was in all 16 positive samples, with three formulas showing three or more concerning results.
Del: "Was that not what the Food and Drug Administration was supposed to be doing all this time?"
The governor calls it the start of their "Exposing Food Toxins" initiative - independent testing for more products ahead. "We want people to be able to make the best decision for them."
This raises the big question: Why has the federal government failed to test baby formula for heavy metals before it hits shelves? Florida is stepping up where the FDA has fallen short, and it's a wake-up call for every parent. Mom's Across America started a relay, and Florida is grabbing the torch.
Watch the full reaction below. If this doesn't make you demand real oversight, what will?
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
We've witnessed the GREATEST DECLINE in human health—especially our children's—ever recorded. No genetic excuse explains it.
It's CLEARLY environmental toxins: fluoride in water, glyphosate and pesticides on crops, hormones in beef, plastics, bisphenols, forever chemicals. We HATE them all!
But where do VACCINES fit in? Major contributor? Catalyst? More science needed—but THIS study from Henry Ford Health blows it wide open!
They graphed it: Vaccinated kids? 57% chance of chronic disease in 10 years. Unvaccinated? Just 17%.
The math screams: Vaccines look like the MAJOR driver. If that's all you remove from the equation, the rates plummet!
@DelBigtree
It's CLEARLY environmental toxins: fluoride in water, glyphosate and pesticides on crops, hormones in beef, plastics, bisphenols, forever chemicals. We HATE them all!
But where do VACCINES fit in? Major contributor? Catalyst? More science needed—but THIS study from Henry Ford Health blows it wide open!
They graphed it: Vaccinated kids? 57% chance of chronic disease in 10 years. Unvaccinated? Just 17%.
The math screams: Vaccines look like the MAJOR driver. If that's all you remove from the equation, the rates plummet!
@DelBigtree
⛔️19 STATES REJECT CDC'S NEW VACCINE SCHEDULE – Aligning with AAP Over International Consensus!
Big news: At least 19 states are refusing to follow the CDC's recently updated childhood vaccine schedule, choosing instead to stick with the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) long-standing recommendations.
The CDC's changes? After a fast-tracked review comparing the US to 20 peer nations, they've slashed routine doses from up to 72 for 18 diseases (including the COVID annual booster) down to just 22-23 doses for 11 diseases. Vaccines like Hepatitis B for newborns, RSV, rotavirus, meningococcal, and flu are now case-by-case under shared decision-making—not routine.
Why the pushback? States say the AAP's schedule is "rooted in science" and trusted for decades. Critics point out AAP's ties to Big Pharma (Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) and conflicts in their immunization committee.
Meanwhile, the new schedule aligns closely with Denmark's—where infant mortality is half the US rate (3.4 vs. 6.4 per 100,000 births) and life expectancy higher—despite far fewer vaccine doses. HHS Secretary @RobertFKennedyJr says this brings us in line with true international scientific consensus, with plans for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to rebuild trust.
AAP is even suing over the changes, claiming financial harm.
What do you think—should states follow the CDC's alignment with global peers, or stick with AAP? Reply below! Share if this raises questions about real science vs. conflicts of interest.
To read the full article & dive deeper: Tap the article card below! #VaccineSchedule #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
https://thehighwire.com/news/states-disregard-cdc-vaccine-schedule-change-despite-international-scientific-consensus/
@delbigtree
Big news: At least 19 states are refusing to follow the CDC's recently updated childhood vaccine schedule, choosing instead to stick with the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) long-standing recommendations.
The CDC's changes? After a fast-tracked review comparing the US to 20 peer nations, they've slashed routine doses from up to 72 for 18 diseases (including the COVID annual booster) down to just 22-23 doses for 11 diseases. Vaccines like Hepatitis B for newborns, RSV, rotavirus, meningococcal, and flu are now case-by-case under shared decision-making—not routine.
Why the pushback? States say the AAP's schedule is "rooted in science" and trusted for decades. Critics point out AAP's ties to Big Pharma (Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) and conflicts in their immunization committee.
Meanwhile, the new schedule aligns closely with Denmark's—where infant mortality is half the US rate (3.4 vs. 6.4 per 100,000 births) and life expectancy higher—despite far fewer vaccine doses. HHS Secretary @RobertFKennedyJr says this brings us in line with true international scientific consensus, with plans for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to rebuild trust.
AAP is even suing over the changes, claiming financial harm.
What do you think—should states follow the CDC's alignment with global peers, or stick with AAP? Reply below! Share if this raises questions about real science vs. conflicts of interest.
To read the full article & dive deeper: Tap the article card below! #VaccineSchedule #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
https://thehighwire.com/news/states-disregard-cdc-vaccine-schedule-change-despite-international-scientific-consensus/
@delbigtree
The HighWire
States Disregard CDC Vaccine Schedule Change Despite International Scientific Consensus - The HighWire
At least 19 states have moved to disregard the updated 2026 CDC childhood vaccination schedule that aligns with peer nations.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 DIRECTED BLOOD DONATIONS UNDER FIRE: Texas Mom's Heartbreaking Fight for Her Daughters' Lives! 🚨
Liz James (Founder of Blessed by His Blood) shares her raw story about her daughters who were born in China with thalassemia.
Texas hearing: Every 2 weeks, her daughters needed life-saving blood transfusions. They found perfect-match donors who turned everything around—until Carter BloodCare suddenly cut them off 2 years ago. No explanation. Just: "You're cut off. End of story."
Her girls' health plummeted. She prayed daily for a miracle. Why the ban? Blood bank officials claim directed donors are "incentivized" and more likely to lie on questionnaires—higher risk because loved ones or good Samaritans might hide "extracurricular habits."
But Liz fires back: Her donors responded to a public Facebook call—hundreds tested, a few matched perfectly. Strangers she's never met face-to-face, driven by pure goodness. "At the core of every human being, we all are created to do good." These heroes genuinely want to help kids thrive—not lie.
This is wild government overreach: Punishing compassion? Criminalizing choice in medical donations? In America, founded on freedom, we should protect directed donations, not ban them based on assumptions.
🎯 Key Concerns:
Incentivized donors = liars? Ignores the human drive to save lives.
No transparency from blood banks—families left in the dark.
Broader threat to medical freedom: Who decides what's "safe" for YOUR family?
What an eye-opener. This points to deeper issues in our health system.
Watch the full clip below 👇
What do you think—is this fair, or total overreach? Reply below! Share if you're standing for medical choice and real compassion.
#MedicalFreedom #BloodDonation #Thalassemia #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
@delbigtree
Liz James (Founder of Blessed by His Blood) shares her raw story about her daughters who were born in China with thalassemia.
Texas hearing: Every 2 weeks, her daughters needed life-saving blood transfusions. They found perfect-match donors who turned everything around—until Carter BloodCare suddenly cut them off 2 years ago. No explanation. Just: "You're cut off. End of story."
Her girls' health plummeted. She prayed daily for a miracle. Why the ban? Blood bank officials claim directed donors are "incentivized" and more likely to lie on questionnaires—higher risk because loved ones or good Samaritans might hide "extracurricular habits."
But Liz fires back: Her donors responded to a public Facebook call—hundreds tested, a few matched perfectly. Strangers she's never met face-to-face, driven by pure goodness. "At the core of every human being, we all are created to do good." These heroes genuinely want to help kids thrive—not lie.
This is wild government overreach: Punishing compassion? Criminalizing choice in medical donations? In America, founded on freedom, we should protect directed donations, not ban them based on assumptions.
🎯 Key Concerns:
Incentivized donors = liars? Ignores the human drive to save lives.
No transparency from blood banks—families left in the dark.
Broader threat to medical freedom: Who decides what's "safe" for YOUR family?
What an eye-opener. This points to deeper issues in our health system.
Watch the full clip below 👇
What do you think—is this fair, or total overreach? Reply below! Share if you're standing for medical choice and real compassion.
#MedicalFreedom #BloodDonation #Thalassemia #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Think about the parents whose children have been devastated…lost to autism, neurological disorders, lifelong suffering. What does justice look like for them?
The cold, hard answer: There’s not enough money in the world.
Admitting the truth - that vaccines can cause autism - would cost tens of TRILLIONS of dollars. We’ve already seen cases settle for $5 million, $20 million... and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
It wouldn’t just about bankrupt the vaccine program. It wouldn’t just bankrupt our healthcare system.
It would BANKRUPT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
That’s the motive behind the denial and the gaslighting. They know the numbers. They know the liability. They know it would collapse everything.
So to those hoping every injured family will one day be fully reimbursed: I wish it were possible. But line up fast, because only the first few would ever see a dime before the whole house of cards comes crashing down.
This is the scale of the crime against our children. We can’t wait for justice from a broken system. We have to DEMAND transparency, real science, and accountability NOW!
@delbigtree
The cold, hard answer: There’s not enough money in the world.
Admitting the truth - that vaccines can cause autism - would cost tens of TRILLIONS of dollars. We’ve already seen cases settle for $5 million, $20 million... and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
It wouldn’t just about bankrupt the vaccine program. It wouldn’t just bankrupt our healthcare system.
It would BANKRUPT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
That’s the motive behind the denial and the gaslighting. They know the numbers. They know the liability. They know it would collapse everything.
So to those hoping every injured family will one day be fully reimbursed: I wish it were possible. But line up fast, because only the first few would ever see a dime before the whole house of cards comes crashing down.
This is the scale of the crime against our children. We can’t wait for justice from a broken system. We have to DEMAND transparency, real science, and accountability NOW!
@delbigtree
⚡3
🚨 HHS Ends Fetal Tissue Research from Elective Abortions
Major policy shift announced on National March for Life
Secretary RFK Jr. just ended the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions in ALL HHS-funded research. This applies across grants, contracts, and programs throughout the Department.
What Just Changed:
The Department of Health and Human Services announced a complete ban on using fetal tissue from elective abortions in agency-funded research. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya says they're "pushing American biomedical science into the 21st century" with alternatives like organoids, tissue chips, and computational biology.
Secretary Kennedy's statement? "The science supports this shift, the ethics demand it, and we will apply this standard consistently across the Department."
What HHS Says:
✓ Ending use of fetal tissue from elective abortions in taxpayer-funded research
✓ Replacing with what they call "gold-standard science"—organoids, tissue chips, computational biology
✓ Policy applies to NIH Intramural Research Program and all extramural research
✓ Supersedes prior NIH guidance
The policy reflects what HHS calls "a shift toward validated research models better suited to today's rapidly evolving scientific landscape."
Broader Context from HHS:
This announcement follows other recent HHS actions:
🎯Office for Civil Rights safeguarding federal healthcare provider conscience rights
🎯CMS requesting Maryland cancel its abortion grant program for federal law compliance
🎯Plans to revise Unaccompanied Children Program rules regarding abortion funding
⏱️The timing—announced on the day of the National March for Life—reflects the Administration's stated priorities on sanctity of life and modernizing biomedical research.
We want to hear from YOU: What questions do you have about this policy shift and the alternative research methods mentioned?
@delbigtree
Major policy shift announced on National March for Life
Secretary RFK Jr. just ended the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions in ALL HHS-funded research. This applies across grants, contracts, and programs throughout the Department.
What Just Changed:
The Department of Health and Human Services announced a complete ban on using fetal tissue from elective abortions in agency-funded research. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya says they're "pushing American biomedical science into the 21st century" with alternatives like organoids, tissue chips, and computational biology.
Secretary Kennedy's statement? "The science supports this shift, the ethics demand it, and we will apply this standard consistently across the Department."
What HHS Says:
✓ Ending use of fetal tissue from elective abortions in taxpayer-funded research
✓ Replacing with what they call "gold-standard science"—organoids, tissue chips, computational biology
✓ Policy applies to NIH Intramural Research Program and all extramural research
✓ Supersedes prior NIH guidance
The policy reflects what HHS calls "a shift toward validated research models better suited to today's rapidly evolving scientific landscape."
Broader Context from HHS:
This announcement follows other recent HHS actions:
🎯Office for Civil Rights safeguarding federal healthcare provider conscience rights
🎯CMS requesting Maryland cancel its abortion grant program for federal law compliance
🎯Plans to revise Unaccompanied Children Program rules regarding abortion funding
⏱️The timing—announced on the day of the National March for Life—reflects the Administration's stated priorities on sanctity of life and modernizing biomedical research.
We want to hear from YOU: What questions do you have about this policy shift and the alternative research methods mentioned?
@delbigtree
⚡2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 STICK TO THE LIE
They had the data. They knew natural immunity was real.
Yet as mandates rolled out, top officials chose messaging over truth.
In a stunning admission, Dr. Paul Offit reveals internal discussions with Fauci and Walensky where natural infection was acknowledged… but rejected publicly because it would be a “nuanced message.”
Translation: tell a simpler story to get more people vaccinated, even if it means ignoring the science.
This wasn’t about evidence. It was about compliance.
And when public health becomes propaganda, trust is the first casualty.
@delbigtree
They had the data. They knew natural immunity was real.
Yet as mandates rolled out, top officials chose messaging over truth.
In a stunning admission, Dr. Paul Offit reveals internal discussions with Fauci and Walensky where natural infection was acknowledged… but rejected publicly because it would be a “nuanced message.”
Translation: tell a simpler story to get more people vaccinated, even if it means ignoring the science.
This wasn’t about evidence. It was about compliance.
And when public health becomes propaganda, trust is the first casualty.
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Doctors and so-called "scientific professionals" keep telling parents of autistic children: "Autism isn't increasing. We're just diagnosing it better."
Let's pause and actually THINK about that claim.
Right now, nationally, 1 in 34 children is being diagnosed with autism. In California? The worst rate ever recorded: 1 in 12.5 boys!
Go back to when we all went to the theater to see Rain Man. It was a massive hit because Dustin Hoffman's character was so unique, so shocking, none of us had ever seen anything like it!
In my entire school growing up?
Not one single child with autism. Not one in the whole school!
If it was truly 1 in 12.5 back then, you would've seen it everywhere. It would've been impossible to miss.
Now look at history: The greatest minds—Charcot, Tourette, Freud—spent years in insane asylums meticulously describing every psychological and neurological condition they saw. Schizophrenia, OCD, every disorder—they documented it all in perfect detail over 100 years ago. Not one single description of autism. No repetitive behaviors, no severe social withdrawal like we see today. It simply didn't exist in their records.
And Bobby Kennedy makes such a great point: Where are all the men my age with autism? If the rates were always this high, every 12th elderly man in a nursing home should have autism. Go visit one. There are none that I know of.
@delbigtree
Let's pause and actually THINK about that claim.
Right now, nationally, 1 in 34 children is being diagnosed with autism. In California? The worst rate ever recorded: 1 in 12.5 boys!
Go back to when we all went to the theater to see Rain Man. It was a massive hit because Dustin Hoffman's character was so unique, so shocking, none of us had ever seen anything like it!
In my entire school growing up?
Not one single child with autism. Not one in the whole school!
If it was truly 1 in 12.5 back then, you would've seen it everywhere. It would've been impossible to miss.
Now look at history: The greatest minds—Charcot, Tourette, Freud—spent years in insane asylums meticulously describing every psychological and neurological condition they saw. Schizophrenia, OCD, every disorder—they documented it all in perfect detail over 100 years ago. Not one single description of autism. No repetitive behaviors, no severe social withdrawal like we see today. It simply didn't exist in their records.
And Bobby Kennedy makes such a great point: Where are all the men my age with autism? If the rates were always this high, every 12th elderly man in a nursing home should have autism. Go visit one. There are none that I know of.
@delbigtree
🔥2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ICYMI: NEW FAUCI EMAILS EXPOSE ATTACK ON NATURAL IMMUNITY: Behind-Closed-Doors Push for Boosters Despite Evidence Showing Superior Protection from Prior Infection
Emails from 2021 show Fauci and top officials like CDC's John Brooks and Rochelle Walensky downplaying natural immunity, calling it "impressive" privately while ignoring it publicly to mandate shots. As mandates rolled out, data already proved infection-induced immunity was more durable than Pfizer's waning vaccine effectiveness.
🎯 Shocking Facts Exposed:
💉Fauci's Email Chain: Praised Israeli data on natural immunity but focused on boosters; Brooks concluded boosters as the "solution" despite natural protection lasting 4-6 months (early data limit).
💉Paul Offit's Admission: In a 2022 call with Fauci, Walensky, Collins, and Murthy, they debated counting natural infection as a "vaccine"—Offit voted yes, noting broader immune response, but the group opted for a "nuanced" (garbled) message to vaccinate everyone.
💉Lying for Compliance: Offit reveals the strategy was to recommend shots for all to ensure high-risk groups complied, even if it meant misleading on natural immunity. No testing offered for prior infection despite widespread testing elsewhere.
💉Widespread Impact: By Biden's mandates, most were likely already immune - yet shots were pushed, potentially narrowing broad immunity.
🚨 Risks? This anti-science dogma eroded trust, forced experimental products, and risked health by overriding nature's superior defenses. Now, states like CA, HI, and CT push COVID shots on kids against CDC advice, endangering populations with lies.
🍀 Path Forward: Hold them accountable: Rand Paul sent criminal referrals for Fauci's lies and record destruction; challenge Biden's blanket pardon. But Trump's DOJ (under Pam Bondi) is blocking MAHA wins: Appealing fluoride ruling (IQ risks to kids) and urging SCOTUS to hear Bayer's Roundup appeal despite cancer losses.
Is this stay-behind networks or conflicts (Bondi's Pfizer ties)? Demand transparency to drain the swamp and protect freedoms.
Watch Del Bigtree and Jeffrey Jaxen unpack these bombshell emails and DOJ roadblocks 👇
What's your take on officials admitting they lied to push mandates? Reply below, share your story, and let's fight for real accountability!
@delbigtree
Emails from 2021 show Fauci and top officials like CDC's John Brooks and Rochelle Walensky downplaying natural immunity, calling it "impressive" privately while ignoring it publicly to mandate shots. As mandates rolled out, data already proved infection-induced immunity was more durable than Pfizer's waning vaccine effectiveness.
🎯 Shocking Facts Exposed:
💉Fauci's Email Chain: Praised Israeli data on natural immunity but focused on boosters; Brooks concluded boosters as the "solution" despite natural protection lasting 4-6 months (early data limit).
💉Paul Offit's Admission: In a 2022 call with Fauci, Walensky, Collins, and Murthy, they debated counting natural infection as a "vaccine"—Offit voted yes, noting broader immune response, but the group opted for a "nuanced" (garbled) message to vaccinate everyone.
💉Lying for Compliance: Offit reveals the strategy was to recommend shots for all to ensure high-risk groups complied, even if it meant misleading on natural immunity. No testing offered for prior infection despite widespread testing elsewhere.
💉Widespread Impact: By Biden's mandates, most were likely already immune - yet shots were pushed, potentially narrowing broad immunity.
🚨 Risks? This anti-science dogma eroded trust, forced experimental products, and risked health by overriding nature's superior defenses. Now, states like CA, HI, and CT push COVID shots on kids against CDC advice, endangering populations with lies.
🍀 Path Forward: Hold them accountable: Rand Paul sent criminal referrals for Fauci's lies and record destruction; challenge Biden's blanket pardon. But Trump's DOJ (under Pam Bondi) is blocking MAHA wins: Appealing fluoride ruling (IQ risks to kids) and urging SCOTUS to hear Bayer's Roundup appeal despite cancer losses.
Is this stay-behind networks or conflicts (Bondi's Pfizer ties)? Demand transparency to drain the swamp and protect freedoms.
Watch Del Bigtree and Jeffrey Jaxen unpack these bombshell emails and DOJ roadblocks 👇
What's your take on officials admitting they lied to push mandates? Reply below, share your story, and let's fight for real accountability!
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mary Holland says Big Pharma’s financial influence over media and politics explains how vaccines are treated.
“70% of the advertising revenue on television and in print media comes from the pharmaceutical industry.”
“The pharmaceutical industry is extremely powerful.”
“They have two lobbyists for every member of Congress, and there is almost no industry that is more powerful in terms of ad dollars and in terms of lobbying.”
“We’ve created this mythology and treat vaccines completely differently than we treat drugs.”
“The hard fact truth is the American Academy of Pediatrics, just like the Tobacco Research Institute, is a front organization for industry.”
“This is a pharmaceutical front organization, and their clients are not your children, their clients are pharmaceutical behemoths.”
@delbigtree
“70% of the advertising revenue on television and in print media comes from the pharmaceutical industry.”
“The pharmaceutical industry is extremely powerful.”
“They have two lobbyists for every member of Congress, and there is almost no industry that is more powerful in terms of ad dollars and in terms of lobbying.”
“We’ve created this mythology and treat vaccines completely differently than we treat drugs.”
“The hard fact truth is the American Academy of Pediatrics, just like the Tobacco Research Institute, is a front organization for industry.”
“This is a pharmaceutical front organization, and their clients are not your children, their clients are pharmaceutical behemoths.”
@delbigtree
🚨 SYNGENTA SETTLES BELLWETHER PARAQUAT TRIAL ON EVE OF OPENING: Retired Landscaper’s Parkinson’s Case Ends in Undisclosed Deal—But Over 8,000 Lawsuits Loom
Chemical giant Syngenta dodges a public reckoning, settling with plaintiff Bill Mertens just before trial in Philadelphia, where evidence linking their paraquat weed killer to Parkinson’s disease was set to go public.
This follows a pattern of pre-trial payouts, including $187M+ for a multi-plaintiff case.
🎯 Shocking Facts Exposed:
• Mertens, 77, alleged exposure in the 1980s-90s while landscaping caused his 2021 Parkinson’s diagnosis—despite using protective gear; inhalation and skin absorption cited.
• Paraquat, used since 1964 on crops like soybeans, corn, and grapes, faces 8,000+ US lawsuits claiming it triggers the incurable brain disease.
• Co-defendant Chevron (distributed until 1986) denies liability; both companies insist no credible link to Parkinson’s.
• Quote from plaintiff’s lawyer Aimee Wagstaff: “Chevron and Syngenta are very bad companies who hurt a lot of people with their killing agent, paraquat.”
🚨 Risks? Paraquat is so toxic, a sip can kill; regulators warn of poisoning dangers. Amid debates, plaintiffs point to decades of science showing brain impacts, yet it’s still widely used, exposing farmers, workers, and communities.
🍀 Path Forward: This settlement comes during EPA’s paraquat review and new ban bills in PA, MO, VT. MAHA demands accountability—push for a national ban, support victims, and end Big Ag’s grip on health. RFK Jr. has spotlighted these toxins; time to drain the swamp!
Link to article:
https://www.thenewlede.org/2026/01/syngenta-settles-bellwether-trial/
@delbigtree
Chemical giant Syngenta dodges a public reckoning, settling with plaintiff Bill Mertens just before trial in Philadelphia, where evidence linking their paraquat weed killer to Parkinson’s disease was set to go public.
This follows a pattern of pre-trial payouts, including $187M+ for a multi-plaintiff case.
🎯 Shocking Facts Exposed:
• Mertens, 77, alleged exposure in the 1980s-90s while landscaping caused his 2021 Parkinson’s diagnosis—despite using protective gear; inhalation and skin absorption cited.
• Paraquat, used since 1964 on crops like soybeans, corn, and grapes, faces 8,000+ US lawsuits claiming it triggers the incurable brain disease.
• Co-defendant Chevron (distributed until 1986) denies liability; both companies insist no credible link to Parkinson’s.
• Quote from plaintiff’s lawyer Aimee Wagstaff: “Chevron and Syngenta are very bad companies who hurt a lot of people with their killing agent, paraquat.”
🚨 Risks? Paraquat is so toxic, a sip can kill; regulators warn of poisoning dangers. Amid debates, plaintiffs point to decades of science showing brain impacts, yet it’s still widely used, exposing farmers, workers, and communities.
🍀 Path Forward: This settlement comes during EPA’s paraquat review and new ban bills in PA, MO, VT. MAHA demands accountability—push for a national ban, support victims, and end Big Ag’s grip on health. RFK Jr. has spotlighted these toxins; time to drain the swamp!
Link to article:
https://www.thenewlede.org/2026/01/syngenta-settles-bellwether-trial/
@delbigtree
The New Lede
Syngenta settles bellwether US trial over paraquat links to Parkinson's
On the eve of the opening of what would have been a bellwether US trial over allegations that a widely used weed killer causes Parkinson’s disease, paraquat-maker Syngenta reached a settlement with the retired landscaper who blamed the company for his diagnosis…
Not so fast... EPA'S LATEST FLUORIDE SHUFFLE: Fast-track review while ALSO appealing the court order to act on "unreasonable risk" of fluoride in our water.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin just announced a shiny "fast-track" review of fluoride in drinking water under the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) banner.
Sounds promising, right? It would be if they weren't still appealing the landmark 2024 federal court ruling that slammed them: Adding fluoride to public water poses an "unreasonable risk" to children's health, especially neurotoxicity and lowered IQ.
Judge Edward Chen ordered the EPA to take regulatory action to protect kids, yet here we are, 16+ months later, getting another endless "review" instead of real protection.🚫
The EPA lost big to Fluoride Action Network and attorney Michael Connett in 2024, backed by the NTP report showing fluoride exposure linked to reduced IQ in children. The science is clear: Ingested fluoride is a neurotoxin.
Key outrages:
🛑EPA files legal briefs challenging the court order the SAME DAY they hype this "gold-standard" review. Hypocrisy much?
🛑This "expedited" process will take 2+ years, while kids keep getting dosed with a toxin the court already flagged as unreasonable.
🛑Dental fluorosis is exploding (41% of teens affected), yet US kids have worse dental health than non-fluoridating countries like Denmark & Finland.
🛑RFK Jr. pushed to end water fluoridation (Utah & Florida already banned it) but the EPA drags its feet with taxpayer-funded appeals and red tape.
Attorney Michael Connett nails it: “The time has come for action to reduce the public’s exposure to fluoride, not just another government review.”
Parents, demand real change: End forced fluoridation NOW.
Full breakdown here:
https://thehighwire.com/news/epa-expedites-fluoride-review-despite-appealing-unreasonable-harm-ruling-from-2024/
@delbigtree
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin just announced a shiny "fast-track" review of fluoride in drinking water under the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) banner.
Sounds promising, right? It would be if they weren't still appealing the landmark 2024 federal court ruling that slammed them: Adding fluoride to public water poses an "unreasonable risk" to children's health, especially neurotoxicity and lowered IQ.
Judge Edward Chen ordered the EPA to take regulatory action to protect kids, yet here we are, 16+ months later, getting another endless "review" instead of real protection.🚫
The EPA lost big to Fluoride Action Network and attorney Michael Connett in 2024, backed by the NTP report showing fluoride exposure linked to reduced IQ in children. The science is clear: Ingested fluoride is a neurotoxin.
Key outrages:
🛑EPA files legal briefs challenging the court order the SAME DAY they hype this "gold-standard" review. Hypocrisy much?
🛑This "expedited" process will take 2+ years, while kids keep getting dosed with a toxin the court already flagged as unreasonable.
🛑Dental fluorosis is exploding (41% of teens affected), yet US kids have worse dental health than non-fluoridating countries like Denmark & Finland.
🛑RFK Jr. pushed to end water fluoridation (Utah & Florida already banned it) but the EPA drags its feet with taxpayer-funded appeals and red tape.
Attorney Michael Connett nails it: “The time has come for action to reduce the public’s exposure to fluoride, not just another government review.”
Parents, demand real change: End forced fluoridation NOW.
Full breakdown here:
https://thehighwire.com/news/epa-expedites-fluoride-review-despite-appealing-unreasonable-harm-ruling-from-2024/
@delbigtree
The HighWire
EPA Expedites Fluoride Review, Despite Appealing “Unreasonable Harm” Ruling From 2024 - The HighWire
EPA announced an expedited review of fluoride while the agency appeals the court ruling it poses an unreasonable risk to human health.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Del recently sat down with @BretWeinstein to talk about "An Inconvenient Study. "
What made this study matter is simple.
Real science means letting your opposition test the hypothesis.
That’s what happened here. Someone who believed vaccines were completely safe agreed to do the study. The results didn’t show what he expected.
People can poke holes in the study all they want, but until we see more studies like this, it begs the question: Why won’t they do more like it?
@delbigtree
What made this study matter is simple.
Real science means letting your opposition test the hypothesis.
That’s what happened here. Someone who believed vaccines were completely safe agreed to do the study. The results didn’t show what he expected.
People can poke holes in the study all they want, but until we see more studies like this, it begs the question: Why won’t they do more like it?
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 MODERNA CEO AT DAVOS: NO GOVERNMENT MANDATES = NO NEW VACCINES 🚨
Big Pharma just admitted what we've been screaming for years: Their entire business model depends on forced uptake through government recommendations and mandates... Not on safety, efficacy, or voluntary choice.
Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos last week (Jan 22, 2026), was asked if RFK Jr.'s HHS reforms cutting vaccine mandates and recommendations would hurt their business.
His response? "Oh 100%." 💥
He told investors publicly: Moderna does NOT foresee investing in ANY new Phase 3 vaccine trials in the foreseeable future.
Why? "You cannot make a return on investment if you don't have access to the U.S. market... your market is much smaller because you don't have a recommendation by the government."
Translation: Without the government forcing billions of doses via mandates, bulk purchases, and universal recommendations, even basic safety trials using real placebos become "too expensive." They won't bother developing new vaccines unless they can count on coercion to guarantee massive sales.
We're just asking for placebo-controlled trials to prove real safety and quality, something every real medicine requires. But Bancel says: If you demand that, and don't force it on Americans, there's no way to make money.
This confirms what we already suspected. The mRNA is built on emergency authorizations, mandates, and taxpayer-funded coercion. Strip away government force and the pipeline suddenly "dries up."
Watch the full video breakdown right here—straight from the CEO's mouth, no spin needed.
@delbigtree
Big Pharma just admitted what we've been screaming for years: Their entire business model depends on forced uptake through government recommendations and mandates... Not on safety, efficacy, or voluntary choice.
Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos last week (Jan 22, 2026), was asked if RFK Jr.'s HHS reforms cutting vaccine mandates and recommendations would hurt their business.
His response? "Oh 100%." 💥
He told investors publicly: Moderna does NOT foresee investing in ANY new Phase 3 vaccine trials in the foreseeable future.
Why? "You cannot make a return on investment if you don't have access to the U.S. market... your market is much smaller because you don't have a recommendation by the government."
Translation: Without the government forcing billions of doses via mandates, bulk purchases, and universal recommendations, even basic safety trials using real placebos become "too expensive." They won't bother developing new vaccines unless they can count on coercion to guarantee massive sales.
We're just asking for placebo-controlled trials to prove real safety and quality, something every real medicine requires. But Bancel says: If you demand that, and don't force it on Americans, there's no way to make money.
This confirms what we already suspected. The mRNA is built on emergency authorizations, mandates, and taxpayer-funded coercion. Strip away government force and the pipeline suddenly "dries up."
Watch the full video breakdown right here—straight from the CEO's mouth, no spin needed.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
DTP VACCINE: "IT MAY KILL MORE CHILDREN THAN IT SAVES"
For 25 years, Dr. Christine Stabell Benn (a medical doctor and researcher) has been studying the real impact of vaccines on overall health in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa. She evaluated DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) beyond just "protection" and looked at other factors. The data she found is alarming.
Historical records from the 1980s DTP rollout: Despite "protecting" against three diseases, it was linked to INCREASED overall mortality.
Kids who got DTP were at 5X HIGHER RISK OF DYING than those who didn't.
"The use of the DTP vaccine may kill more children than it saves."
Simple tweaks to the schedule in low-income countries could save 1.1 MILLION KIDS PER YEAR...That's over 3,000 CHILDREN EVERY SINGLE DAY.
Dr. Benn: "I know these results are extremely uncomfortable... but this is what the data tells us."
And in an amazing show of hypocrisy: The SAME "ethical" groups blocking studies on the bloated American/Danish/German vaccine schedules... are STILL pushing DTP worldwide, ignoring ICAN lawsuits in the International Criminal Court.
They are making no changes and taking no accountability, yet they lecture on "ethics"? Yeah, let's talk about THAT.
Mandates and schedules are built on assumptions, not science.
@delbigtree
For 25 years, Dr. Christine Stabell Benn (a medical doctor and researcher) has been studying the real impact of vaccines on overall health in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa. She evaluated DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) beyond just "protection" and looked at other factors. The data she found is alarming.
Historical records from the 1980s DTP rollout: Despite "protecting" against three diseases, it was linked to INCREASED overall mortality.
Kids who got DTP were at 5X HIGHER RISK OF DYING than those who didn't.
"The use of the DTP vaccine may kill more children than it saves."
Simple tweaks to the schedule in low-income countries could save 1.1 MILLION KIDS PER YEAR...That's over 3,000 CHILDREN EVERY SINGLE DAY.
Dr. Benn: "I know these results are extremely uncomfortable... but this is what the data tells us."
And in an amazing show of hypocrisy: The SAME "ethical" groups blocking studies on the bloated American/Danish/German vaccine schedules... are STILL pushing DTP worldwide, ignoring ICAN lawsuits in the International Criminal Court.
They are making no changes and taking no accountability, yet they lecture on "ethics"? Yeah, let's talk about THAT.
Mandates and schedules are built on assumptions, not science.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 The UK is openly building an AI-powered surveillance state.
Under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Britain plans to create an interactive map of England and Wales designed to predict crime before it happens.
The government calls it "prevention."
Officials admit the goal is to use artificial intelligence and government data to monitor so-called antisocial behavior and allow police to intervene before any actual crime occurs.
Even more chilling, the British Home Secretary openly compared the system to Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon, a model of total observation where the eyes of the state are on you at all times.
That is not conspiracy theory. That is their stated objective.
From smart cities to facial recognition to predictive policing, Western nations are moving fast toward constant digital surveillance of everyday life.
The question is simple. Who decides what behavior deserves intervention? And what happens when the algorithm gets it wrong?
@delbigtree
Under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Britain plans to create an interactive map of England and Wales designed to predict crime before it happens.
The government calls it "prevention."
Officials admit the goal is to use artificial intelligence and government data to monitor so-called antisocial behavior and allow police to intervene before any actual crime occurs.
Even more chilling, the British Home Secretary openly compared the system to Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon, a model of total observation where the eyes of the state are on you at all times.
That is not conspiracy theory. That is their stated objective.
From smart cities to facial recognition to predictive policing, Western nations are moving fast toward constant digital surveillance of everyday life.
The question is simple. Who decides what behavior deserves intervention? And what happens when the algorithm gets it wrong?
@delbigtree
🚨BREAKTHROUGH: The first detransitioner medical malpractice case to go to trial just resulted in a $2 MILLION verdict.
Fox Varian was 16 years old when she received a double mastectomy. The psychologist and surgeon were both found liable.
The jury awarded $1.6 million for past and future pain and suffering, and $400,000 for future medical expenses.
Varian's lawyers argued that the psychologist "drove the train," and that her mother was pressured into consent after being told her daughter would commit suicide if they didn't proceed.
Varian also had anorexia, body dysmorphia, and autism - conditions with overlapping symptoms that her legal team argued were never adequately diagnosed before surgery.
There are currently 28 active detransitioner lawsuits across the country. And on February 11, the Texas Supreme Court will hear an appeal that could impact the statute of limitations in cases like these nationwide.
This is just the beginning.
https://thehighwire.com/news/first-detransitioner-medical-malpractice-trial-results-in-2-million-verdict-against-psychologist-surgeon/
@delbigtree
Fox Varian was 16 years old when she received a double mastectomy. The psychologist and surgeon were both found liable.
The jury awarded $1.6 million for past and future pain and suffering, and $400,000 for future medical expenses.
Varian's lawyers argued that the psychologist "drove the train," and that her mother was pressured into consent after being told her daughter would commit suicide if they didn't proceed.
Varian also had anorexia, body dysmorphia, and autism - conditions with overlapping symptoms that her legal team argued were never adequately diagnosed before surgery.
There are currently 28 active detransitioner lawsuits across the country. And on February 11, the Texas Supreme Court will hear an appeal that could impact the statute of limitations in cases like these nationwide.
This is just the beginning.
https://thehighwire.com/news/first-detransitioner-medical-malpractice-trial-results-in-2-million-verdict-against-psychologist-surgeon/
@delbigtree
The HighWire
First Detransitioner Medical Malpractice Trial Results In $2 Million Verdict Against Psychologist, Surgeon - The HighWire
Jury awards $2M to 22-year-old detransitioner in first U.S. malpractice trial over double mastectomy performed at age 16.
👍3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Listen to what @BretWeinstein is saying here. It’s one of the most gut-punch breakdowns I’ve heard about why the people inside these broken institutions can look at devastating evidence of harm to children… and still choose silence.
He calls himself a “de facto atheist,” and yet he sees something most people refuse to admit:
When you don’t believe in anything bigger than yourself, it becomes far too easy to make peace with evil.
How do you ignore when studies show severe harm to kids? How do you watch the vaccine program keep rolling when the data screams danger?
You tell yourself the same lie they all tell themselves:
“It won’t make a difference anyway.”
“The system is too corrupt.”
“If I speak up, I’ll be destroyed.”
“No one’s going to listen. The government won’t act. Institutions are untouchable.”
That’s the utilitarian calculus they run: “The greater good is keeping the machine running, even if it crushes a generation of children.” And once you accept that logic, you can justify literally anything...slavery, genocide, medical experiments on kids. History proves it.
Here’s the part that hits hardest:
Faith in a higher power is not gameable.
You can lie to yourself. You can lie to your colleagues. You can lie to the public. But you cannot lie to God. You cannot convince an all-knowing Judge that “it wouldn’t have mattered anyway” or “I had to protect my career.”
That internal moral compass - knowing someone is listening to your thoughts - keeps you from crossing lines that pure utilitarianism happily sprints across.
Brett nails it: Science displaced faith in the modern world, but we never replaced what faith actually did, especially when it comes to the heavy moral lifting...
This is why the cover-up continues. Because too many of them have no fear of anything higher than a paycheck, a title, or peer approval.
We are in a spiritual crisis masquerading as a scientific one.
Watch Brett lay this out below 👇—it’s raw, it’s real, and it explains exactly why we can’t wait for the system to fix itself.
Share this far and wide. Our kids deserve adults who still believe some things are more important than self-preservation.
@delbigtree
He calls himself a “de facto atheist,” and yet he sees something most people refuse to admit:
When you don’t believe in anything bigger than yourself, it becomes far too easy to make peace with evil.
How do you ignore when studies show severe harm to kids? How do you watch the vaccine program keep rolling when the data screams danger?
You tell yourself the same lie they all tell themselves:
“It won’t make a difference anyway.”
“The system is too corrupt.”
“If I speak up, I’ll be destroyed.”
“No one’s going to listen. The government won’t act. Institutions are untouchable.”
That’s the utilitarian calculus they run: “The greater good is keeping the machine running, even if it crushes a generation of children.” And once you accept that logic, you can justify literally anything...slavery, genocide, medical experiments on kids. History proves it.
Here’s the part that hits hardest:
Faith in a higher power is not gameable.
You can lie to yourself. You can lie to your colleagues. You can lie to the public. But you cannot lie to God. You cannot convince an all-knowing Judge that “it wouldn’t have mattered anyway” or “I had to protect my career.”
That internal moral compass - knowing someone is listening to your thoughts - keeps you from crossing lines that pure utilitarianism happily sprints across.
Brett nails it: Science displaced faith in the modern world, but we never replaced what faith actually did, especially when it comes to the heavy moral lifting...
This is why the cover-up continues. Because too many of them have no fear of anything higher than a paycheck, a title, or peer approval.
We are in a spiritual crisis masquerading as a scientific one.
Watch Brett lay this out below 👇—it’s raw, it’s real, and it explains exactly why we can’t wait for the system to fix itself.
Share this far and wide. Our kids deserve adults who still believe some things are more important than self-preservation.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
THE MOST TERRIFYING HEADLINE YOU'LL SEE.
Researchers at private companies are doing work more dangerous than anything climate-related when it comes to pandemic risk.
Daily Mail headline: "Lab-grown life takes a major step forward as scientists use AI to create virus never before seen."
Read that again. AI. Creating viruses. That have never existed.
Dr. Woolfson from the company told the Daily Mail: "For at least 4 billion years, all life on Earth has evolved by the trial and error process of Darwinian evolution by natural selection, which lacks any foresight or intention."
Then he drops this: "Natural evolution now has a co-author, and it's people."
So let's get this straight—we're going to replace the lack of natural intention and foresight with something we have ZERO foresight on and is completely unnatural?
These comments, along with how he speaks about nature and intelligent design, are enough to make your skin crawl.
Let's just marry AI and nature. Let the chips fall where they may.
What could possibly go wrong?
This isn't science fiction anymore. This is happening RIGHT NOW in private labs with zero accountability.
Who's overseeing this? Who's stopping this? Who's even asking if we SHOULD be doing this?
@delbigtree
Researchers at private companies are doing work more dangerous than anything climate-related when it comes to pandemic risk.
Daily Mail headline: "Lab-grown life takes a major step forward as scientists use AI to create virus never before seen."
Read that again. AI. Creating viruses. That have never existed.
Dr. Woolfson from the company told the Daily Mail: "For at least 4 billion years, all life on Earth has evolved by the trial and error process of Darwinian evolution by natural selection, which lacks any foresight or intention."
Then he drops this: "Natural evolution now has a co-author, and it's people."
So let's get this straight—we're going to replace the lack of natural intention and foresight with something we have ZERO foresight on and is completely unnatural?
These comments, along with how he speaks about nature and intelligent design, are enough to make your skin crawl.
Let's just marry AI and nature. Let the chips fall where they may.
What could possibly go wrong?
This isn't science fiction anymore. This is happening RIGHT NOW in private labs with zero accountability.
Who's overseeing this? Who's stopping this? Who's even asking if we SHOULD be doing this?
@delbigtree
❤2
People who don't know better roll their eyes when I say it, but it's true: Pharma is so powerful it literally owns our television sets. And because of that, it owns our government too.
You think that’s a big, broad statement? Then do this simple test tonight.
Next time you’re watching the news (or any show you trust), don’t run to grab popcorn during the commercial break. Count the ads.
Count how many of them are from the pharmaceutical industry.
I’m telling you: 50–70% of all television advertising revenue comes from Big Pharma. Test it yourself. Watch a news anchor you respect. Watch CNN, NBC, ABC, MSNBC - doesn’t matter. Look at the breaks. See if half or more of the commercials are pushing pills, shots, or treatments.
If I’m right (and I am), then you just realized something huge:
The pharmaceutical industry is the primary funder of the very program you’re watching.
Those drug ads aren’t just background noise, they are paying the bills for the network. They are paying the salary of that news anchor you think is going to tell you the unfiltered truth.
So when you wonder, “If vaccines were really causing problems, wouldn’t CNN tell us? Wouldn’t NBC break the story?”
No. They won’t.
Because the second they air something that seriously threatens their biggest advertiser, that money disappears. The shows get defunded. The budgets shrink. People lose jobs.
Pharma isn’t just an advertiser; they are the boss.
That smiling anchor reading the teleprompter? He’s not working for you. He’s working for the industry that keeps the lights on.
This is why you never see the real stories about vaccine injury, about exploding chronic illness in children, about liability protection, about corruption. The truth doesn’t fit the business model.
Wake up to who’s really in control of the information you’re fed every single day.
Watch this clip below 👇—then go count those commercials tonight and tell me I’m wrong.
@delbigtree
You think that’s a big, broad statement? Then do this simple test tonight.
Next time you’re watching the news (or any show you trust), don’t run to grab popcorn during the commercial break. Count the ads.
Count how many of them are from the pharmaceutical industry.
I’m telling you: 50–70% of all television advertising revenue comes from Big Pharma. Test it yourself. Watch a news anchor you respect. Watch CNN, NBC, ABC, MSNBC - doesn’t matter. Look at the breaks. See if half or more of the commercials are pushing pills, shots, or treatments.
If I’m right (and I am), then you just realized something huge:
The pharmaceutical industry is the primary funder of the very program you’re watching.
Those drug ads aren’t just background noise, they are paying the bills for the network. They are paying the salary of that news anchor you think is going to tell you the unfiltered truth.
So when you wonder, “If vaccines were really causing problems, wouldn’t CNN tell us? Wouldn’t NBC break the story?”
No. They won’t.
Because the second they air something that seriously threatens their biggest advertiser, that money disappears. The shows get defunded. The budgets shrink. People lose jobs.
Pharma isn’t just an advertiser; they are the boss.
That smiling anchor reading the teleprompter? He’s not working for you. He’s working for the industry that keeps the lights on.
This is why you never see the real stories about vaccine injury, about exploding chronic illness in children, about liability protection, about corruption. The truth doesn’t fit the business model.
Wake up to who’s really in control of the information you’re fed every single day.
Watch this clip below 👇—then go count those commercials tonight and tell me I’m wrong.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯1