This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
If you want to know the truth about vaccines, don’t take my word for it. Don’t take the government’s word for it. Read what the manufacturers themselves submitted.
Start with your pediatrician. Ask them to hand you the vaccine insert. Just ask.
If they say, “Of course! Let’s read it together,” you’ve found a rare doctor who respects you and your child. Hold on to them.
But if they bristle. If they question why you’re asking. If they try to bully you or shame you that’s your sign. You’re in the wrong office with someone who doesn’t value informed consent.
Now here’s how to do it yourself.
Google “FDA licensed vaccines.”
At the same time, pull up the CDC childhood vaccine scheduleso you know what’s being recommended. Click each vaccine then open the package insert. That’s the warning label that arrives with the product.
Then go straight to Section 6.1.
That’s the safety trial. That’s the best evidence they relied on to inject this product into your child.
Want your mind blown? Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine they were giving on day one of life. Read that they considered a study of 147 children, followed for five days, with no placebo group, sufficient to declare it safe and then mandated it for every newborn in America. In some cases, they’ll even threaten Child Protective Services if you say no.
@delbigtree
Start with your pediatrician. Ask them to hand you the vaccine insert. Just ask.
If they say, “Of course! Let’s read it together,” you’ve found a rare doctor who respects you and your child. Hold on to them.
But if they bristle. If they question why you’re asking. If they try to bully you or shame you that’s your sign. You’re in the wrong office with someone who doesn’t value informed consent.
Now here’s how to do it yourself.
Google “FDA licensed vaccines.”
At the same time, pull up the CDC childhood vaccine scheduleso you know what’s being recommended. Click each vaccine then open the package insert. That’s the warning label that arrives with the product.
Then go straight to Section 6.1.
That’s the safety trial. That’s the best evidence they relied on to inject this product into your child.
Want your mind blown? Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine they were giving on day one of life. Read that they considered a study of 147 children, followed for five days, with no placebo group, sufficient to declare it safe and then mandated it for every newborn in America. In some cases, they’ll even threaten Child Protective Services if you say no.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Pay close attention when you hear the phrase “there is no evidence that vaccines cause harm” or “there is no evidence that vaccines cause autism.”
Because what that statement really means is something far more disturbing.
It means there is no evidence at all.
No real science proving they don’t.
I know this because we went looking for it. We didn’t speculate. We didn’t guess. We sued the CDC. We said, “Show us the studies.” Not opinions. Not press releases. The actual trials you rely on to say vaccines do not cause autism.
We made it simple.
Just the first six vaccines given in the first six months of life.
Hepatitis B. DTaP. Polio. The basics.
Send us the studies.
What did they send back?
Twenty studies that didn’t include any of those vaccines.
Not one.
So let’s just be clear: there is no science showing that hepatitis B, DTaP, or polio vaccines do not cause autism. Period. That science does not exist.
What they did send were a handful of heavily manipulated studies focused almost entirely on the MMR vaccine which is the vaccine at the center of Vaxxed. And even there, the data is riddled with assumptions, exclusions, and statistical gymnastics designed to protect a conclusion that was decided in advance.
This entire narrative that vaccines are conclusively proven safe when it comes to autism is built on assumptions, wishful thinking, and forceful propaganda. Not on rigorous science.
And that becomes a very serious problem when injuries are no longer rare, when chronic illness is exploding, and when parents are watching their children suffer while being told, “There’s no evidence.”
No...there’s just no evidence either way.
Pretending that equals safety is not science.
@delbigtree
Because what that statement really means is something far more disturbing.
It means there is no evidence at all.
No real science proving they don’t.
I know this because we went looking for it. We didn’t speculate. We didn’t guess. We sued the CDC. We said, “Show us the studies.” Not opinions. Not press releases. The actual trials you rely on to say vaccines do not cause autism.
We made it simple.
Just the first six vaccines given in the first six months of life.
Hepatitis B. DTaP. Polio. The basics.
Send us the studies.
What did they send back?
Twenty studies that didn’t include any of those vaccines.
Not one.
So let’s just be clear: there is no science showing that hepatitis B, DTaP, or polio vaccines do not cause autism. Period. That science does not exist.
What they did send were a handful of heavily manipulated studies focused almost entirely on the MMR vaccine which is the vaccine at the center of Vaxxed. And even there, the data is riddled with assumptions, exclusions, and statistical gymnastics designed to protect a conclusion that was decided in advance.
This entire narrative that vaccines are conclusively proven safe when it comes to autism is built on assumptions, wishful thinking, and forceful propaganda. Not on rigorous science.
And that becomes a very serious problem when injuries are no longer rare, when chronic illness is exploding, and when parents are watching their children suffer while being told, “There’s no evidence.”
No...there’s just no evidence either way.
Pretending that equals safety is not science.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Here’s a simple question every parent should feel comfortable asking when they visit their doctor: “Can I see the vaccine insert?”
If your pediatrician says, “I'm so glad you asked! Let’s read it together,” hold on to them. That’s a doctor who respects informed consent.
If you are met with defensiveness, attitude, or pressure that should tell you everything you need to know.
You don’t need special access to do your own homework. You can find every FDA-licensed vaccine insert yourself:
• Look up the CDC recommended childhood schedule
• Click each vaccine listed
• Open the package insert (the official warning label)
• Go straight to Section 6.1. You will find the safety data the approval relied on
That’s where you’ll see:
1⃣ The number of children studied
2⃣ How long they were monitored
3⃣ Whether there was a placebo group
4⃣ And what they thought “safe enough” meant
Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine, which has historically been given on day one of life. Read the safety section. Then ask yourself if that’s the standard you’re comfortable with.
You owe it to yourself (and to your child) to read what you’re being asked to sign off on.
@delbigtree
If your pediatrician says, “I'm so glad you asked! Let’s read it together,” hold on to them. That’s a doctor who respects informed consent.
If you are met with defensiveness, attitude, or pressure that should tell you everything you need to know.
You don’t need special access to do your own homework. You can find every FDA-licensed vaccine insert yourself:
• Look up the CDC recommended childhood schedule
• Click each vaccine listed
• Open the package insert (the official warning label)
• Go straight to Section 6.1. You will find the safety data the approval relied on
That’s where you’ll see:
1⃣ The number of children studied
2⃣ How long they were monitored
3⃣ Whether there was a placebo group
4⃣ And what they thought “safe enough” meant
Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine, which has historically been given on day one of life. Read the safety section. Then ask yourself if that’s the standard you’re comfortable with.
You owe it to yourself (and to your child) to read what you’re being asked to sign off on.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Peter Hotez was caught red handed… gaslighting families that have had pediatricians kick them out of their practices or worse, had protective services called on them for wanting to opt out of the CDC recommendations. Peter Hotez says that in Dr’s offices, “there was never coercion.” We know this has been happening for years, but even CBS news reported this was happening as far back as 2012… a survey by the American Journal of Preventative Medicine showed that 25% of pediatricians have fired patients for refusing vaccines. Sounds like coercion to me… who’s gaslighting now?
Nevermind the coercion that goes on at schools in states like CA or NY where your child cannot attend unless you follow the recommendations exactly.
If we want to have real conversations around the changes to the schedule, we have to start with honesty and transparency- it’s what we’ve been asking for since day one of this movement.
Come on, Peter. Do better.
@delbigtree
Nevermind the coercion that goes on at schools in states like CA or NY where your child cannot attend unless you follow the recommendations exactly.
If we want to have real conversations around the changes to the schedule, we have to start with honesty and transparency- it’s what we’ve been asking for since day one of this movement.
Come on, Peter. Do better.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
To enroll a child aged 24 months to 4 years in preschool in Connecticut, they MUST get an annual flu shot. No opt-outs for faith. So, what do you do?
MOVE. That's right. Your state has turned against you and your family. It's mandating injections that could harm your child forever: paralysis, speech delays, neurological disorders, even encephalitis (brain swelling) side effects listed on vaccines you never see.
I've interviewed THOUSANDS of parents who've faced this regret. You DO have a choice. Don't tell yourself otherwise. No 20-foot wall traps you in Connecticut or California. If you truly care about your kids, pack up. Job? Doesn't matter. Protect them first.
Unless you're ready to stand and FIGHT. I get it. I was there. But I refused to raise my family in a place where a broken arm from a tree fall could trigger Child Protective Services over a Tdap shot, discovering no vaccines, and risking medical kidnapping.
Don't live in fear. Choose freedom.
@delbigtree
MOVE. That's right. Your state has turned against you and your family. It's mandating injections that could harm your child forever: paralysis, speech delays, neurological disorders, even encephalitis (brain swelling) side effects listed on vaccines you never see.
I've interviewed THOUSANDS of parents who've faced this regret. You DO have a choice. Don't tell yourself otherwise. No 20-foot wall traps you in Connecticut or California. If you truly care about your kids, pack up. Job? Doesn't matter. Protect them first.
Unless you're ready to stand and FIGHT. I get it. I was there. But I refused to raise my family in a place where a broken arm from a tree fall could trigger Child Protective Services over a Tdap shot, discovering no vaccines, and risking medical kidnapping.
Don't live in fear. Choose freedom.
@delbigtree
❤2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Until They Produce EVEN ONE Study Showing Vaccinated Kids Are HEALTHIER - We Have a Crisis
The evidence is mounting, and the silence is deafening.
Until someone…ANYONE…produces at least one study, if not 10, comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children and shows the unvaccinated are actually sicker... this is very strong science pointing in ONE direction.
I'm challenging every nation, every major medical institution worldwide: DO THIS STUDY YOURSELF and see if you get a different result!
Let's drop the bias. Let's drop the sides. This is about OUR CHILDREN.
Are these products making our kids healthier... or NOT?
If they're NOT - if they're making us sicker- then why are we doing this?
This simple comparison should NOT be avoided. It should NOT be attacked. It should be celebrated and done by EVERY institution on Earth!
All of science is warning us: This is the first generation of children who will NOT live as long as their parents. We're reversing the course of longevity and health in our species.
If you think you're doing the right thing for your kids... think again. They're facing shorter, sicker lives.
We need an international conversation on this IMMEDIATELY!
@delbigtree
The evidence is mounting, and the silence is deafening.
Until someone…ANYONE…produces at least one study, if not 10, comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children and shows the unvaccinated are actually sicker... this is very strong science pointing in ONE direction.
I'm challenging every nation, every major medical institution worldwide: DO THIS STUDY YOURSELF and see if you get a different result!
Let's drop the bias. Let's drop the sides. This is about OUR CHILDREN.
Are these products making our kids healthier... or NOT?
If they're NOT - if they're making us sicker- then why are we doing this?
This simple comparison should NOT be avoided. It should NOT be attacked. It should be celebrated and done by EVERY institution on Earth!
All of science is warning us: This is the first generation of children who will NOT live as long as their parents. We're reversing the course of longevity and health in our species.
If you think you're doing the right thing for your kids... think again. They're facing shorter, sicker lives.
We need an international conversation on this IMMEDIATELY!
@delbigtree
⚡1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The old guard just blinked, and it changes everything.
Legacy vaccine pioneers Stanley Plotkin and Walter Orenstein, architects of the current program, published a paper admitting what we've been demanding for years: The public is no longer satisfied with "simply detecting and quantifying" risks AFTER vaccines are rolled out to millions. They want authorities to "mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse reactions" BEFORE they happen.
Del Bigtree breaks it down in this clip: "That should have been bolded... What they're saying is what we have proven: There are no placebo trials of any childhood vaccines. That was acceptable back in the day by Stanley Plotkin and Walter Orenstein. But now... because of Jeffrey Jackson and Robert Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree and others like us... we're going to have to start doing those safety tests."
This is vindication: The push for true placebo-controlled trials, long-term data, and real prevention—led by RFK Jr. at HHS—is forcing even the establishment to concede the old ways aren't enough.
"We all just want safety. And there's only one side that would prefer authoritarianism over safety."
Watch the full segment below. If you've felt the pressure to "just trust," this moment will definitely resonate.
@delbigtree
Legacy vaccine pioneers Stanley Plotkin and Walter Orenstein, architects of the current program, published a paper admitting what we've been demanding for years: The public is no longer satisfied with "simply detecting and quantifying" risks AFTER vaccines are rolled out to millions. They want authorities to "mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse reactions" BEFORE they happen.
Del Bigtree breaks it down in this clip: "That should have been bolded... What they're saying is what we have proven: There are no placebo trials of any childhood vaccines. That was acceptable back in the day by Stanley Plotkin and Walter Orenstein. But now... because of Jeffrey Jackson and Robert Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree and others like us... we're going to have to start doing those safety tests."
This is vindication: The push for true placebo-controlled trials, long-term data, and real prevention—led by RFK Jr. at HHS—is forcing even the establishment to concede the old ways aren't enough.
"We all just want safety. And there's only one side that would prefer authoritarianism over safety."
Watch the full segment below. If you've felt the pressure to "just trust," this moment will definitely resonate.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Even people who truly believe in vaccines, who want to trust the system, they're now forced to confront the hard questions.
"What happened during COVID? I know that rushed jab didn't work like they promised. I watched it get pushed to market at warp speed. So... maybe what Del and Bobby are saying is true. Were the others rushed too? Did they have proper, long-term safety testing?"
There's NO drug on Earth that doesn't injure some people - some children. So how can this product be "safe and effective" for everybody? It's not. Certainly not for all.
The real conversation has always been: Who's it not safe for? That's it. Nothing more.
I'm not trying to get anyone to stop vaccinating. What I am demanding is recognition of the known side effects. Warning labels on every vaccine (that no one reads) include brain swelling and encephalitis—which can lead to symptoms like autism, Tourette's, or even light swelling turning into ADHD. So much more research needs to be done!
Look at the explosion: In the 1980s, just before they took away liability from manufacturers, chronic disease in kids was about 12.8%. By 2015, with up to 54 vaccines (72 total doses counting multiples like DTaP), we saw chronic illness skyrocket to 54% of America's children (including obesity). Strip out obesity? Still a staggering 40%+ chronically ill.
Our kids deserve better answers, better science, and real informed consent.
@delbigtree
"What happened during COVID? I know that rushed jab didn't work like they promised. I watched it get pushed to market at warp speed. So... maybe what Del and Bobby are saying is true. Were the others rushed too? Did they have proper, long-term safety testing?"
There's NO drug on Earth that doesn't injure some people - some children. So how can this product be "safe and effective" for everybody? It's not. Certainly not for all.
The real conversation has always been: Who's it not safe for? That's it. Nothing more.
I'm not trying to get anyone to stop vaccinating. What I am demanding is recognition of the known side effects. Warning labels on every vaccine (that no one reads) include brain swelling and encephalitis—which can lead to symptoms like autism, Tourette's, or even light swelling turning into ADHD. So much more research needs to be done!
Look at the explosion: In the 1980s, just before they took away liability from manufacturers, chronic disease in kids was about 12.8%. By 2015, with up to 54 vaccines (72 total doses counting multiples like DTaP), we saw chronic illness skyrocket to 54% of America's children (including obesity). Strip out obesity? Still a staggering 40%+ chronically ill.
Our kids deserve better answers, better science, and real informed consent.
@delbigtree
❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"If you say it, prove it. Where is it? Post it. Print it."
Del Bigtree calls out the hypocrisy loud and clear: Mainstream media tells us "trust the experts" and "the science is settled," but when challenged, they hide the evidence.
Meanwhile, The HighWire shows our work every week: full transcripts, sources, hyperlinks, everything. Just enter your email on the homepage (under "Brave Bold News"), and we send you the complete show—videos, articles, all of it. We don't share your info; it's our charter.
This is The HighWire Protocol: Total transparency. We demand the same from every network and news agency worldwide. If someone claims "placebo trials exist for childhood vaccines," show us the proof. Don't just assert—deliver. That's what real journalism looks like.
Watch the full clip below. We're putting the power back in your hands. If you think we're cherry-picking, call it out—we welcome it.
Who's ready for real transparency from legacy media?
@delbigtree
Del Bigtree calls out the hypocrisy loud and clear: Mainstream media tells us "trust the experts" and "the science is settled," but when challenged, they hide the evidence.
Meanwhile, The HighWire shows our work every week: full transcripts, sources, hyperlinks, everything. Just enter your email on the homepage (under "Brave Bold News"), and we send you the complete show—videos, articles, all of it. We don't share your info; it's our charter.
This is The HighWire Protocol: Total transparency. We demand the same from every network and news agency worldwide. If someone claims "placebo trials exist for childhood vaccines," show us the proof. Don't just assert—deliver. That's what real journalism looks like.
Watch the full clip below. We're putting the power back in your hands. If you think we're cherry-picking, call it out—we welcome it.
Who's ready for real transparency from legacy media?
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The FDA is supposed to protect our babies from toxins in food—but Florida had to do it themselves. And the results are alarming.
In this clip, Del Bigtree and Jefferey Jaxen react to a Florida Department of Health report: The state tested 24 infant formulas, and 16 contained at least one heavy metal (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium) above federal safety standards. Mercury was in all 16 positive samples, with three formulas showing three or more concerning results.
Del: "Was that not what the Food and Drug Administration was supposed to be doing all this time?"
The governor calls it the start of their "Exposing Food Toxins" initiative - independent testing for more products ahead. "We want people to be able to make the best decision for them."
This raises the big question: Why has the federal government failed to test baby formula for heavy metals before it hits shelves? Florida is stepping up where the FDA has fallen short, and it's a wake-up call for every parent. Mom's Across America started a relay, and Florida is grabbing the torch.
Watch the full reaction below. If this doesn't make you demand real oversight, what will?
@delbigtree
In this clip, Del Bigtree and Jefferey Jaxen react to a Florida Department of Health report: The state tested 24 infant formulas, and 16 contained at least one heavy metal (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium) above federal safety standards. Mercury was in all 16 positive samples, with three formulas showing three or more concerning results.
Del: "Was that not what the Food and Drug Administration was supposed to be doing all this time?"
The governor calls it the start of their "Exposing Food Toxins" initiative - independent testing for more products ahead. "We want people to be able to make the best decision for them."
This raises the big question: Why has the federal government failed to test baby formula for heavy metals before it hits shelves? Florida is stepping up where the FDA has fallen short, and it's a wake-up call for every parent. Mom's Across America started a relay, and Florida is grabbing the torch.
Watch the full reaction below. If this doesn't make you demand real oversight, what will?
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
We've witnessed the GREATEST DECLINE in human health—especially our children's—ever recorded. No genetic excuse explains it.
It's CLEARLY environmental toxins: fluoride in water, glyphosate and pesticides on crops, hormones in beef, plastics, bisphenols, forever chemicals. We HATE them all!
But where do VACCINES fit in? Major contributor? Catalyst? More science needed—but THIS study from Henry Ford Health blows it wide open!
They graphed it: Vaccinated kids? 57% chance of chronic disease in 10 years. Unvaccinated? Just 17%.
The math screams: Vaccines look like the MAJOR driver. If that's all you remove from the equation, the rates plummet!
@DelBigtree
It's CLEARLY environmental toxins: fluoride in water, glyphosate and pesticides on crops, hormones in beef, plastics, bisphenols, forever chemicals. We HATE them all!
But where do VACCINES fit in? Major contributor? Catalyst? More science needed—but THIS study from Henry Ford Health blows it wide open!
They graphed it: Vaccinated kids? 57% chance of chronic disease in 10 years. Unvaccinated? Just 17%.
The math screams: Vaccines look like the MAJOR driver. If that's all you remove from the equation, the rates plummet!
@DelBigtree
⛔️19 STATES REJECT CDC'S NEW VACCINE SCHEDULE – Aligning with AAP Over International Consensus!
Big news: At least 19 states are refusing to follow the CDC's recently updated childhood vaccine schedule, choosing instead to stick with the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) long-standing recommendations.
The CDC's changes? After a fast-tracked review comparing the US to 20 peer nations, they've slashed routine doses from up to 72 for 18 diseases (including the COVID annual booster) down to just 22-23 doses for 11 diseases. Vaccines like Hepatitis B for newborns, RSV, rotavirus, meningococcal, and flu are now case-by-case under shared decision-making—not routine.
Why the pushback? States say the AAP's schedule is "rooted in science" and trusted for decades. Critics point out AAP's ties to Big Pharma (Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) and conflicts in their immunization committee.
Meanwhile, the new schedule aligns closely with Denmark's—where infant mortality is half the US rate (3.4 vs. 6.4 per 100,000 births) and life expectancy higher—despite far fewer vaccine doses. HHS Secretary @RobertFKennedyJr says this brings us in line with true international scientific consensus, with plans for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to rebuild trust.
AAP is even suing over the changes, claiming financial harm.
What do you think—should states follow the CDC's alignment with global peers, or stick with AAP? Reply below! Share if this raises questions about real science vs. conflicts of interest.
To read the full article & dive deeper: Tap the article card below! #VaccineSchedule #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
https://thehighwire.com/news/states-disregard-cdc-vaccine-schedule-change-despite-international-scientific-consensus/
@delbigtree
Big news: At least 19 states are refusing to follow the CDC's recently updated childhood vaccine schedule, choosing instead to stick with the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) long-standing recommendations.
The CDC's changes? After a fast-tracked review comparing the US to 20 peer nations, they've slashed routine doses from up to 72 for 18 diseases (including the COVID annual booster) down to just 22-23 doses for 11 diseases. Vaccines like Hepatitis B for newborns, RSV, rotavirus, meningococcal, and flu are now case-by-case under shared decision-making—not routine.
Why the pushback? States say the AAP's schedule is "rooted in science" and trusted for decades. Critics point out AAP's ties to Big Pharma (Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) and conflicts in their immunization committee.
Meanwhile, the new schedule aligns closely with Denmark's—where infant mortality is half the US rate (3.4 vs. 6.4 per 100,000 births) and life expectancy higher—despite far fewer vaccine doses. HHS Secretary @RobertFKennedyJr says this brings us in line with true international scientific consensus, with plans for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to rebuild trust.
AAP is even suing over the changes, claiming financial harm.
What do you think—should states follow the CDC's alignment with global peers, or stick with AAP? Reply below! Share if this raises questions about real science vs. conflicts of interest.
To read the full article & dive deeper: Tap the article card below! #VaccineSchedule #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
https://thehighwire.com/news/states-disregard-cdc-vaccine-schedule-change-despite-international-scientific-consensus/
@delbigtree
The HighWire
States Disregard CDC Vaccine Schedule Change Despite International Scientific Consensus - The HighWire
At least 19 states have moved to disregard the updated 2026 CDC childhood vaccination schedule that aligns with peer nations.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 DIRECTED BLOOD DONATIONS UNDER FIRE: Texas Mom's Heartbreaking Fight for Her Daughters' Lives! 🚨
Liz James (Founder of Blessed by His Blood) shares her raw story about her daughters who were born in China with thalassemia.
Texas hearing: Every 2 weeks, her daughters needed life-saving blood transfusions. They found perfect-match donors who turned everything around—until Carter BloodCare suddenly cut them off 2 years ago. No explanation. Just: "You're cut off. End of story."
Her girls' health plummeted. She prayed daily for a miracle. Why the ban? Blood bank officials claim directed donors are "incentivized" and more likely to lie on questionnaires—higher risk because loved ones or good Samaritans might hide "extracurricular habits."
But Liz fires back: Her donors responded to a public Facebook call—hundreds tested, a few matched perfectly. Strangers she's never met face-to-face, driven by pure goodness. "At the core of every human being, we all are created to do good." These heroes genuinely want to help kids thrive—not lie.
This is wild government overreach: Punishing compassion? Criminalizing choice in medical donations? In America, founded on freedom, we should protect directed donations, not ban them based on assumptions.
🎯 Key Concerns:
Incentivized donors = liars? Ignores the human drive to save lives.
No transparency from blood banks—families left in the dark.
Broader threat to medical freedom: Who decides what's "safe" for YOUR family?
What an eye-opener. This points to deeper issues in our health system.
Watch the full clip below 👇
What do you think—is this fair, or total overreach? Reply below! Share if you're standing for medical choice and real compassion.
#MedicalFreedom #BloodDonation #Thalassemia #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
@delbigtree
Liz James (Founder of Blessed by His Blood) shares her raw story about her daughters who were born in China with thalassemia.
Texas hearing: Every 2 weeks, her daughters needed life-saving blood transfusions. They found perfect-match donors who turned everything around—until Carter BloodCare suddenly cut them off 2 years ago. No explanation. Just: "You're cut off. End of story."
Her girls' health plummeted. She prayed daily for a miracle. Why the ban? Blood bank officials claim directed donors are "incentivized" and more likely to lie on questionnaires—higher risk because loved ones or good Samaritans might hide "extracurricular habits."
But Liz fires back: Her donors responded to a public Facebook call—hundreds tested, a few matched perfectly. Strangers she's never met face-to-face, driven by pure goodness. "At the core of every human being, we all are created to do good." These heroes genuinely want to help kids thrive—not lie.
This is wild government overreach: Punishing compassion? Criminalizing choice in medical donations? In America, founded on freedom, we should protect directed donations, not ban them based on assumptions.
🎯 Key Concerns:
Incentivized donors = liars? Ignores the human drive to save lives.
No transparency from blood banks—families left in the dark.
Broader threat to medical freedom: Who decides what's "safe" for YOUR family?
What an eye-opener. This points to deeper issues in our health system.
Watch the full clip below 👇
What do you think—is this fair, or total overreach? Reply below! Share if you're standing for medical choice and real compassion.
#MedicalFreedom #BloodDonation #Thalassemia #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Think about the parents whose children have been devastated…lost to autism, neurological disorders, lifelong suffering. What does justice look like for them?
The cold, hard answer: There’s not enough money in the world.
Admitting the truth - that vaccines can cause autism - would cost tens of TRILLIONS of dollars. We’ve already seen cases settle for $5 million, $20 million... and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
It wouldn’t just about bankrupt the vaccine program. It wouldn’t just bankrupt our healthcare system.
It would BANKRUPT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
That’s the motive behind the denial and the gaslighting. They know the numbers. They know the liability. They know it would collapse everything.
So to those hoping every injured family will one day be fully reimbursed: I wish it were possible. But line up fast, because only the first few would ever see a dime before the whole house of cards comes crashing down.
This is the scale of the crime against our children. We can’t wait for justice from a broken system. We have to DEMAND transparency, real science, and accountability NOW!
@delbigtree
The cold, hard answer: There’s not enough money in the world.
Admitting the truth - that vaccines can cause autism - would cost tens of TRILLIONS of dollars. We’ve already seen cases settle for $5 million, $20 million... and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
It wouldn’t just about bankrupt the vaccine program. It wouldn’t just bankrupt our healthcare system.
It would BANKRUPT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
That’s the motive behind the denial and the gaslighting. They know the numbers. They know the liability. They know it would collapse everything.
So to those hoping every injured family will one day be fully reimbursed: I wish it were possible. But line up fast, because only the first few would ever see a dime before the whole house of cards comes crashing down.
This is the scale of the crime against our children. We can’t wait for justice from a broken system. We have to DEMAND transparency, real science, and accountability NOW!
@delbigtree
⚡3
🚨 HHS Ends Fetal Tissue Research from Elective Abortions
Major policy shift announced on National March for Life
Secretary RFK Jr. just ended the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions in ALL HHS-funded research. This applies across grants, contracts, and programs throughout the Department.
What Just Changed:
The Department of Health and Human Services announced a complete ban on using fetal tissue from elective abortions in agency-funded research. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya says they're "pushing American biomedical science into the 21st century" with alternatives like organoids, tissue chips, and computational biology.
Secretary Kennedy's statement? "The science supports this shift, the ethics demand it, and we will apply this standard consistently across the Department."
What HHS Says:
✓ Ending use of fetal tissue from elective abortions in taxpayer-funded research
✓ Replacing with what they call "gold-standard science"—organoids, tissue chips, computational biology
✓ Policy applies to NIH Intramural Research Program and all extramural research
✓ Supersedes prior NIH guidance
The policy reflects what HHS calls "a shift toward validated research models better suited to today's rapidly evolving scientific landscape."
Broader Context from HHS:
This announcement follows other recent HHS actions:
🎯Office for Civil Rights safeguarding federal healthcare provider conscience rights
🎯CMS requesting Maryland cancel its abortion grant program for federal law compliance
🎯Plans to revise Unaccompanied Children Program rules regarding abortion funding
⏱️The timing—announced on the day of the National March for Life—reflects the Administration's stated priorities on sanctity of life and modernizing biomedical research.
We want to hear from YOU: What questions do you have about this policy shift and the alternative research methods mentioned?
@delbigtree
Major policy shift announced on National March for Life
Secretary RFK Jr. just ended the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions in ALL HHS-funded research. This applies across grants, contracts, and programs throughout the Department.
What Just Changed:
The Department of Health and Human Services announced a complete ban on using fetal tissue from elective abortions in agency-funded research. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya says they're "pushing American biomedical science into the 21st century" with alternatives like organoids, tissue chips, and computational biology.
Secretary Kennedy's statement? "The science supports this shift, the ethics demand it, and we will apply this standard consistently across the Department."
What HHS Says:
✓ Ending use of fetal tissue from elective abortions in taxpayer-funded research
✓ Replacing with what they call "gold-standard science"—organoids, tissue chips, computational biology
✓ Policy applies to NIH Intramural Research Program and all extramural research
✓ Supersedes prior NIH guidance
The policy reflects what HHS calls "a shift toward validated research models better suited to today's rapidly evolving scientific landscape."
Broader Context from HHS:
This announcement follows other recent HHS actions:
🎯Office for Civil Rights safeguarding federal healthcare provider conscience rights
🎯CMS requesting Maryland cancel its abortion grant program for federal law compliance
🎯Plans to revise Unaccompanied Children Program rules regarding abortion funding
⏱️The timing—announced on the day of the National March for Life—reflects the Administration's stated priorities on sanctity of life and modernizing biomedical research.
We want to hear from YOU: What questions do you have about this policy shift and the alternative research methods mentioned?
@delbigtree
⚡2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 STICK TO THE LIE
They had the data. They knew natural immunity was real.
Yet as mandates rolled out, top officials chose messaging over truth.
In a stunning admission, Dr. Paul Offit reveals internal discussions with Fauci and Walensky where natural infection was acknowledged… but rejected publicly because it would be a “nuanced message.”
Translation: tell a simpler story to get more people vaccinated, even if it means ignoring the science.
This wasn’t about evidence. It was about compliance.
And when public health becomes propaganda, trust is the first casualty.
@delbigtree
They had the data. They knew natural immunity was real.
Yet as mandates rolled out, top officials chose messaging over truth.
In a stunning admission, Dr. Paul Offit reveals internal discussions with Fauci and Walensky where natural infection was acknowledged… but rejected publicly because it would be a “nuanced message.”
Translation: tell a simpler story to get more people vaccinated, even if it means ignoring the science.
This wasn’t about evidence. It was about compliance.
And when public health becomes propaganda, trust is the first casualty.
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Doctors and so-called "scientific professionals" keep telling parents of autistic children: "Autism isn't increasing. We're just diagnosing it better."
Let's pause and actually THINK about that claim.
Right now, nationally, 1 in 34 children is being diagnosed with autism. In California? The worst rate ever recorded: 1 in 12.5 boys!
Go back to when we all went to the theater to see Rain Man. It was a massive hit because Dustin Hoffman's character was so unique, so shocking, none of us had ever seen anything like it!
In my entire school growing up?
Not one single child with autism. Not one in the whole school!
If it was truly 1 in 12.5 back then, you would've seen it everywhere. It would've been impossible to miss.
Now look at history: The greatest minds—Charcot, Tourette, Freud—spent years in insane asylums meticulously describing every psychological and neurological condition they saw. Schizophrenia, OCD, every disorder—they documented it all in perfect detail over 100 years ago. Not one single description of autism. No repetitive behaviors, no severe social withdrawal like we see today. It simply didn't exist in their records.
And Bobby Kennedy makes such a great point: Where are all the men my age with autism? If the rates were always this high, every 12th elderly man in a nursing home should have autism. Go visit one. There are none that I know of.
@delbigtree
Let's pause and actually THINK about that claim.
Right now, nationally, 1 in 34 children is being diagnosed with autism. In California? The worst rate ever recorded: 1 in 12.5 boys!
Go back to when we all went to the theater to see Rain Man. It was a massive hit because Dustin Hoffman's character was so unique, so shocking, none of us had ever seen anything like it!
In my entire school growing up?
Not one single child with autism. Not one in the whole school!
If it was truly 1 in 12.5 back then, you would've seen it everywhere. It would've been impossible to miss.
Now look at history: The greatest minds—Charcot, Tourette, Freud—spent years in insane asylums meticulously describing every psychological and neurological condition they saw. Schizophrenia, OCD, every disorder—they documented it all in perfect detail over 100 years ago. Not one single description of autism. No repetitive behaviors, no severe social withdrawal like we see today. It simply didn't exist in their records.
And Bobby Kennedy makes such a great point: Where are all the men my age with autism? If the rates were always this high, every 12th elderly man in a nursing home should have autism. Go visit one. There are none that I know of.
@delbigtree
🔥2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ICYMI: NEW FAUCI EMAILS EXPOSE ATTACK ON NATURAL IMMUNITY: Behind-Closed-Doors Push for Boosters Despite Evidence Showing Superior Protection from Prior Infection
Emails from 2021 show Fauci and top officials like CDC's John Brooks and Rochelle Walensky downplaying natural immunity, calling it "impressive" privately while ignoring it publicly to mandate shots. As mandates rolled out, data already proved infection-induced immunity was more durable than Pfizer's waning vaccine effectiveness.
🎯 Shocking Facts Exposed:
💉Fauci's Email Chain: Praised Israeli data on natural immunity but focused on boosters; Brooks concluded boosters as the "solution" despite natural protection lasting 4-6 months (early data limit).
💉Paul Offit's Admission: In a 2022 call with Fauci, Walensky, Collins, and Murthy, they debated counting natural infection as a "vaccine"—Offit voted yes, noting broader immune response, but the group opted for a "nuanced" (garbled) message to vaccinate everyone.
💉Lying for Compliance: Offit reveals the strategy was to recommend shots for all to ensure high-risk groups complied, even if it meant misleading on natural immunity. No testing offered for prior infection despite widespread testing elsewhere.
💉Widespread Impact: By Biden's mandates, most were likely already immune - yet shots were pushed, potentially narrowing broad immunity.
🚨 Risks? This anti-science dogma eroded trust, forced experimental products, and risked health by overriding nature's superior defenses. Now, states like CA, HI, and CT push COVID shots on kids against CDC advice, endangering populations with lies.
🍀 Path Forward: Hold them accountable: Rand Paul sent criminal referrals for Fauci's lies and record destruction; challenge Biden's blanket pardon. But Trump's DOJ (under Pam Bondi) is blocking MAHA wins: Appealing fluoride ruling (IQ risks to kids) and urging SCOTUS to hear Bayer's Roundup appeal despite cancer losses.
Is this stay-behind networks or conflicts (Bondi's Pfizer ties)? Demand transparency to drain the swamp and protect freedoms.
Watch Del Bigtree and Jeffrey Jaxen unpack these bombshell emails and DOJ roadblocks 👇
What's your take on officials admitting they lied to push mandates? Reply below, share your story, and let's fight for real accountability!
@delbigtree
Emails from 2021 show Fauci and top officials like CDC's John Brooks and Rochelle Walensky downplaying natural immunity, calling it "impressive" privately while ignoring it publicly to mandate shots. As mandates rolled out, data already proved infection-induced immunity was more durable than Pfizer's waning vaccine effectiveness.
🎯 Shocking Facts Exposed:
💉Fauci's Email Chain: Praised Israeli data on natural immunity but focused on boosters; Brooks concluded boosters as the "solution" despite natural protection lasting 4-6 months (early data limit).
💉Paul Offit's Admission: In a 2022 call with Fauci, Walensky, Collins, and Murthy, they debated counting natural infection as a "vaccine"—Offit voted yes, noting broader immune response, but the group opted for a "nuanced" (garbled) message to vaccinate everyone.
💉Lying for Compliance: Offit reveals the strategy was to recommend shots for all to ensure high-risk groups complied, even if it meant misleading on natural immunity. No testing offered for prior infection despite widespread testing elsewhere.
💉Widespread Impact: By Biden's mandates, most were likely already immune - yet shots were pushed, potentially narrowing broad immunity.
🚨 Risks? This anti-science dogma eroded trust, forced experimental products, and risked health by overriding nature's superior defenses. Now, states like CA, HI, and CT push COVID shots on kids against CDC advice, endangering populations with lies.
🍀 Path Forward: Hold them accountable: Rand Paul sent criminal referrals for Fauci's lies and record destruction; challenge Biden's blanket pardon. But Trump's DOJ (under Pam Bondi) is blocking MAHA wins: Appealing fluoride ruling (IQ risks to kids) and urging SCOTUS to hear Bayer's Roundup appeal despite cancer losses.
Is this stay-behind networks or conflicts (Bondi's Pfizer ties)? Demand transparency to drain the swamp and protect freedoms.
Watch Del Bigtree and Jeffrey Jaxen unpack these bombshell emails and DOJ roadblocks 👇
What's your take on officials admitting they lied to push mandates? Reply below, share your story, and let's fight for real accountability!
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mary Holland says Big Pharma’s financial influence over media and politics explains how vaccines are treated.
“70% of the advertising revenue on television and in print media comes from the pharmaceutical industry.”
“The pharmaceutical industry is extremely powerful.”
“They have two lobbyists for every member of Congress, and there is almost no industry that is more powerful in terms of ad dollars and in terms of lobbying.”
“We’ve created this mythology and treat vaccines completely differently than we treat drugs.”
“The hard fact truth is the American Academy of Pediatrics, just like the Tobacco Research Institute, is a front organization for industry.”
“This is a pharmaceutical front organization, and their clients are not your children, their clients are pharmaceutical behemoths.”
@delbigtree
“70% of the advertising revenue on television and in print media comes from the pharmaceutical industry.”
“The pharmaceutical industry is extremely powerful.”
“They have two lobbyists for every member of Congress, and there is almost no industry that is more powerful in terms of ad dollars and in terms of lobbying.”
“We’ve created this mythology and treat vaccines completely differently than we treat drugs.”
“The hard fact truth is the American Academy of Pediatrics, just like the Tobacco Research Institute, is a front organization for industry.”
“This is a pharmaceutical front organization, and their clients are not your children, their clients are pharmaceutical behemoths.”
@delbigtree
🚨 SYNGENTA SETTLES BELLWETHER PARAQUAT TRIAL ON EVE OF OPENING: Retired Landscaper’s Parkinson’s Case Ends in Undisclosed Deal—But Over 8,000 Lawsuits Loom
Chemical giant Syngenta dodges a public reckoning, settling with plaintiff Bill Mertens just before trial in Philadelphia, where evidence linking their paraquat weed killer to Parkinson’s disease was set to go public.
This follows a pattern of pre-trial payouts, including $187M+ for a multi-plaintiff case.
🎯 Shocking Facts Exposed:
• Mertens, 77, alleged exposure in the 1980s-90s while landscaping caused his 2021 Parkinson’s diagnosis—despite using protective gear; inhalation and skin absorption cited.
• Paraquat, used since 1964 on crops like soybeans, corn, and grapes, faces 8,000+ US lawsuits claiming it triggers the incurable brain disease.
• Co-defendant Chevron (distributed until 1986) denies liability; both companies insist no credible link to Parkinson’s.
• Quote from plaintiff’s lawyer Aimee Wagstaff: “Chevron and Syngenta are very bad companies who hurt a lot of people with their killing agent, paraquat.”
🚨 Risks? Paraquat is so toxic, a sip can kill; regulators warn of poisoning dangers. Amid debates, plaintiffs point to decades of science showing brain impacts, yet it’s still widely used, exposing farmers, workers, and communities.
🍀 Path Forward: This settlement comes during EPA’s paraquat review and new ban bills in PA, MO, VT. MAHA demands accountability—push for a national ban, support victims, and end Big Ag’s grip on health. RFK Jr. has spotlighted these toxins; time to drain the swamp!
Link to article:
https://www.thenewlede.org/2026/01/syngenta-settles-bellwether-trial/
@delbigtree
Chemical giant Syngenta dodges a public reckoning, settling with plaintiff Bill Mertens just before trial in Philadelphia, where evidence linking their paraquat weed killer to Parkinson’s disease was set to go public.
This follows a pattern of pre-trial payouts, including $187M+ for a multi-plaintiff case.
🎯 Shocking Facts Exposed:
• Mertens, 77, alleged exposure in the 1980s-90s while landscaping caused his 2021 Parkinson’s diagnosis—despite using protective gear; inhalation and skin absorption cited.
• Paraquat, used since 1964 on crops like soybeans, corn, and grapes, faces 8,000+ US lawsuits claiming it triggers the incurable brain disease.
• Co-defendant Chevron (distributed until 1986) denies liability; both companies insist no credible link to Parkinson’s.
• Quote from plaintiff’s lawyer Aimee Wagstaff: “Chevron and Syngenta are very bad companies who hurt a lot of people with their killing agent, paraquat.”
🚨 Risks? Paraquat is so toxic, a sip can kill; regulators warn of poisoning dangers. Amid debates, plaintiffs point to decades of science showing brain impacts, yet it’s still widely used, exposing farmers, workers, and communities.
🍀 Path Forward: This settlement comes during EPA’s paraquat review and new ban bills in PA, MO, VT. MAHA demands accountability—push for a national ban, support victims, and end Big Ag’s grip on health. RFK Jr. has spotlighted these toxins; time to drain the swamp!
Link to article:
https://www.thenewlede.org/2026/01/syngenta-settles-bellwether-trial/
@delbigtree
The New Lede
Syngenta settles bellwether US trial over paraquat links to Parkinson's
On the eve of the opening of what would have been a bellwether US trial over allegations that a widely used weed killer causes Parkinson’s disease, paraquat-maker Syngenta reached a settlement with the retired landscaper who blamed the company for his diagnosis…
Not so fast... EPA'S LATEST FLUORIDE SHUFFLE: Fast-track review while ALSO appealing the court order to act on "unreasonable risk" of fluoride in our water.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin just announced a shiny "fast-track" review of fluoride in drinking water under the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) banner.
Sounds promising, right? It would be if they weren't still appealing the landmark 2024 federal court ruling that slammed them: Adding fluoride to public water poses an "unreasonable risk" to children's health, especially neurotoxicity and lowered IQ.
Judge Edward Chen ordered the EPA to take regulatory action to protect kids, yet here we are, 16+ months later, getting another endless "review" instead of real protection.🚫
The EPA lost big to Fluoride Action Network and attorney Michael Connett in 2024, backed by the NTP report showing fluoride exposure linked to reduced IQ in children. The science is clear: Ingested fluoride is a neurotoxin.
Key outrages:
🛑EPA files legal briefs challenging the court order the SAME DAY they hype this "gold-standard" review. Hypocrisy much?
🛑This "expedited" process will take 2+ years, while kids keep getting dosed with a toxin the court already flagged as unreasonable.
🛑Dental fluorosis is exploding (41% of teens affected), yet US kids have worse dental health than non-fluoridating countries like Denmark & Finland.
🛑RFK Jr. pushed to end water fluoridation (Utah & Florida already banned it) but the EPA drags its feet with taxpayer-funded appeals and red tape.
Attorney Michael Connett nails it: “The time has come for action to reduce the public’s exposure to fluoride, not just another government review.”
Parents, demand real change: End forced fluoridation NOW.
Full breakdown here:
https://thehighwire.com/news/epa-expedites-fluoride-review-despite-appealing-unreasonable-harm-ruling-from-2024/
@delbigtree
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin just announced a shiny "fast-track" review of fluoride in drinking water under the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) banner.
Sounds promising, right? It would be if they weren't still appealing the landmark 2024 federal court ruling that slammed them: Adding fluoride to public water poses an "unreasonable risk" to children's health, especially neurotoxicity and lowered IQ.
Judge Edward Chen ordered the EPA to take regulatory action to protect kids, yet here we are, 16+ months later, getting another endless "review" instead of real protection.🚫
The EPA lost big to Fluoride Action Network and attorney Michael Connett in 2024, backed by the NTP report showing fluoride exposure linked to reduced IQ in children. The science is clear: Ingested fluoride is a neurotoxin.
Key outrages:
🛑EPA files legal briefs challenging the court order the SAME DAY they hype this "gold-standard" review. Hypocrisy much?
🛑This "expedited" process will take 2+ years, while kids keep getting dosed with a toxin the court already flagged as unreasonable.
🛑Dental fluorosis is exploding (41% of teens affected), yet US kids have worse dental health than non-fluoridating countries like Denmark & Finland.
🛑RFK Jr. pushed to end water fluoridation (Utah & Florida already banned it) but the EPA drags its feet with taxpayer-funded appeals and red tape.
Attorney Michael Connett nails it: “The time has come for action to reduce the public’s exposure to fluoride, not just another government review.”
Parents, demand real change: End forced fluoridation NOW.
Full breakdown here:
https://thehighwire.com/news/epa-expedites-fluoride-review-despite-appealing-unreasonable-harm-ruling-from-2024/
@delbigtree
The HighWire
EPA Expedites Fluoride Review, Despite Appealing “Unreasonable Harm” Ruling From 2024 - The HighWire
EPA announced an expedited review of fluoride while the agency appeals the court ruling it poses an unreasonable risk to human health.