Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨Debunking Grok: Polio Vaccine Trials You’ve Never Been Shown
Aaron Siri breaks down the licensing data for today’s polio vaccine, IPOL. It was licensed in 1990, and in its clinical trial, safety was only reviewed for three days after injection.
THREE. DAYS.
There was no control group.
This is not the Salk or Sabin vaccine most people think of. This version uses Vero cells, monkey kidney cells modified to replicate indefinitely.
Del notes that although some claim the original IPV was tested against a saline placebo, the modern IPOL vaccine was never tested against that earlier product.
When pressed on whether the Salk vaccine truly had a saline placebo, Siri is clear. It did not.
The control injection contained formalin, antibiotics, dye, and other ingredients. By any definition, that is not an inert placebo.
@delbigtree
Aaron Siri breaks down the licensing data for today’s polio vaccine, IPOL. It was licensed in 1990, and in its clinical trial, safety was only reviewed for three days after injection.
THREE. DAYS.
There was no control group.
This is not the Salk or Sabin vaccine most people think of. This version uses Vero cells, monkey kidney cells modified to replicate indefinitely.
Del notes that although some claim the original IPV was tested against a saline placebo, the modern IPOL vaccine was never tested against that earlier product.
When pressed on whether the Salk vaccine truly had a saline placebo, Siri is clear. It did not.
The control injection contained formalin, antibiotics, dye, and other ingredients. By any definition, that is not an inert placebo.
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There is rarely a real risk/benefit analysis done when it comes to vaccines. Dr. Pompa and @delbigtree had a great discussion about what the number really are, and what the stats are for these diseases.
In some cases, infection with measles and mumps actually LOWERS your risk of other ailments later in life.
@delbigtree
In some cases, infection with measles and mumps actually LOWERS your risk of other ailments later in life.
@delbigtree
❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Physicians for Informed Consent has released a new resource compiling CDC-reported incidence data on vaccine-targeted diseases - every documented case, spanning the 20th century, before the vaccine era.
Dr. Sears has been practicing for 28 years and states he has never encountered a single severe case of these illnesses in his career.
Patients routinely ask about the quantifiable risk of not vaccinating. This book provides it: the actual numbers, drawn directly from historical surveillance records.
The rates are strikingly low.
@delbigtree
Dr. Sears has been practicing for 28 years and states he has never encountered a single severe case of these illnesses in his career.
Patients routinely ask about the quantifiable risk of not vaccinating. This book provides it: the actual numbers, drawn directly from historical surveillance records.
The rates are strikingly low.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
When legacy media accidentally says the quiet part out loud…
Whoopi Goldberg argues that the government has no business telling families what to do, that parents should decide with their doctor, and that medical choices belong at home, not in Washington.
Del’s reaction says it all:
“Whoopi, that’s exactly what Robert Kennedy just did. He just said the government shouldn’t be telling you what to do with this vaccine, especially if you are negative. As a mother, you should have the right to choose and have the conversation with your doctor.”
The irony is impossible to miss.
When the message aligns with establishment power, it’s framed as responsible. When it challenges that power, it’s treated as dangerous.
So the real question isn’t whether families should have medical autonomy.
It’s who is allowed to say it out loud.
@delbigtree
Whoopi Goldberg argues that the government has no business telling families what to do, that parents should decide with their doctor, and that medical choices belong at home, not in Washington.
Del’s reaction says it all:
“Whoopi, that’s exactly what Robert Kennedy just did. He just said the government shouldn’t be telling you what to do with this vaccine, especially if you are negative. As a mother, you should have the right to choose and have the conversation with your doctor.”
The irony is impossible to miss.
When the message aligns with establishment power, it’s framed as responsible. When it challenges that power, it’s treated as dangerous.
So the real question isn’t whether families should have medical autonomy.
It’s who is allowed to say it out loud.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There is not a single study in the entire world - not from a single health department in any nation - that has compared vaccinated kids to unvaccinated kids and shown that the vaccinated are the ones who have better health outcomes. They will never admit they were wrong, because that would mean accepting liability for trillions of dollars in damages.
@delbigtree
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
They kicked Dr. Drew off of tiktok while we were talking. There’s something deeply revealing happening right now, and if you’re paying attention, you can feel it.
We’re finally starting to hear conversations that were off-limits for decades. Actual conversations.
And that matters because when you silence discussion, you don’t eliminate harm. You just abandon the people living with it.
Let me be clear about something. Rare injuries exist. They’re real. And when they happen, whether from a disease, a medication, or a medical intervention, they’re devastating. No one disputes that.
But here’s the question no one in authority seems willing to answer:
Why is it acceptable to talk about rare injuries in every medical context except vaccines?
Why is empathy allowed everywhere except here?
If a child is injured by a rare disease complication, we speak openly. We fund research. We support families. But when that injury follows a vaccine, suddenly the rules change. Suddenly you’re not allowed to ask questions. Suddenly the injury becomes invisible. Suddenly the parent becomes the problem.
For those suffering vaccine injury, it’s not political. It’s their daily reality. And pretending those people don’t exist doesn’t make vaccines safer, but it sure does make medicine weaker.
What I’m encouraging people to do now is simple, but powerful: trust your instincts again. Ask yourself whether you’re getting a full, well-rounded picture or whether someone has decided certain information is too dangerous for you to hear.
Because the truth is real science welcomes debate. Real science isn’t afraid of questions. And real public health doesn’t require censorship to survive.
Which brings me to the most telling part of all this.
We had a conversation like this measured, calm, balanced, on a show. And in the middle of it, TikTok shut down the stream and issued a strike for “community guideline violations.” Just for a discussion.
That’s why these debates matter. That’s why I’m encouraged. Because even when they try to shut it down, the conversation keeps happening. And every time it does, a little more light gets in.
@delbigtree
We’re finally starting to hear conversations that were off-limits for decades. Actual conversations.
And that matters because when you silence discussion, you don’t eliminate harm. You just abandon the people living with it.
Let me be clear about something. Rare injuries exist. They’re real. And when they happen, whether from a disease, a medication, or a medical intervention, they’re devastating. No one disputes that.
But here’s the question no one in authority seems willing to answer:
Why is it acceptable to talk about rare injuries in every medical context except vaccines?
Why is empathy allowed everywhere except here?
If a child is injured by a rare disease complication, we speak openly. We fund research. We support families. But when that injury follows a vaccine, suddenly the rules change. Suddenly you’re not allowed to ask questions. Suddenly the injury becomes invisible. Suddenly the parent becomes the problem.
For those suffering vaccine injury, it’s not political. It’s their daily reality. And pretending those people don’t exist doesn’t make vaccines safer, but it sure does make medicine weaker.
What I’m encouraging people to do now is simple, but powerful: trust your instincts again. Ask yourself whether you’re getting a full, well-rounded picture or whether someone has decided certain information is too dangerous for you to hear.
Because the truth is real science welcomes debate. Real science isn’t afraid of questions. And real public health doesn’t require censorship to survive.
Which brings me to the most telling part of all this.
We had a conversation like this measured, calm, balanced, on a show. And in the middle of it, TikTok shut down the stream and issued a strike for “community guideline violations.” Just for a discussion.
That’s why these debates matter. That’s why I’m encouraged. Because even when they try to shut it down, the conversation keeps happening. And every time it does, a little more light gets in.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
They keep telling you the science is settled. Vut settled on what, exactly? One vaccine? Two? Ten at once? Seventy-two over childhood? There isn’t a single study asking whether piling them together is safe.
Meanwhile, our kids get more vaccines and more drugs than any other nation… and they’re also the sickest. At some point, you have to stop trusting slogans and start asking real questions.
@delbigtree
Meanwhile, our kids get more vaccines and more drugs than any other nation… and they’re also the sickest. At some point, you have to stop trusting slogans and start asking real questions.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
If you want to know the truth about vaccines, don’t take my word for it. Don’t take the government’s word for it. Read what the manufacturers themselves submitted.
Start with your pediatrician. Ask them to hand you the vaccine insert. Just ask.
If they say, “Of course! Let’s read it together,” you’ve found a rare doctor who respects you and your child. Hold on to them.
But if they bristle. If they question why you’re asking. If they try to bully you or shame you that’s your sign. You’re in the wrong office with someone who doesn’t value informed consent.
Now here’s how to do it yourself.
Google “FDA licensed vaccines.”
At the same time, pull up the CDC childhood vaccine scheduleso you know what’s being recommended. Click each vaccine then open the package insert. That’s the warning label that arrives with the product.
Then go straight to Section 6.1.
That’s the safety trial. That’s the best evidence they relied on to inject this product into your child.
Want your mind blown? Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine they were giving on day one of life. Read that they considered a study of 147 children, followed for five days, with no placebo group, sufficient to declare it safe and then mandated it for every newborn in America. In some cases, they’ll even threaten Child Protective Services if you say no.
@delbigtree
Start with your pediatrician. Ask them to hand you the vaccine insert. Just ask.
If they say, “Of course! Let’s read it together,” you’ve found a rare doctor who respects you and your child. Hold on to them.
But if they bristle. If they question why you’re asking. If they try to bully you or shame you that’s your sign. You’re in the wrong office with someone who doesn’t value informed consent.
Now here’s how to do it yourself.
Google “FDA licensed vaccines.”
At the same time, pull up the CDC childhood vaccine scheduleso you know what’s being recommended. Click each vaccine then open the package insert. That’s the warning label that arrives with the product.
Then go straight to Section 6.1.
That’s the safety trial. That’s the best evidence they relied on to inject this product into your child.
Want your mind blown? Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine they were giving on day one of life. Read that they considered a study of 147 children, followed for five days, with no placebo group, sufficient to declare it safe and then mandated it for every newborn in America. In some cases, they’ll even threaten Child Protective Services if you say no.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Pay close attention when you hear the phrase “there is no evidence that vaccines cause harm” or “there is no evidence that vaccines cause autism.”
Because what that statement really means is something far more disturbing.
It means there is no evidence at all.
No real science proving they don’t.
I know this because we went looking for it. We didn’t speculate. We didn’t guess. We sued the CDC. We said, “Show us the studies.” Not opinions. Not press releases. The actual trials you rely on to say vaccines do not cause autism.
We made it simple.
Just the first six vaccines given in the first six months of life.
Hepatitis B. DTaP. Polio. The basics.
Send us the studies.
What did they send back?
Twenty studies that didn’t include any of those vaccines.
Not one.
So let’s just be clear: there is no science showing that hepatitis B, DTaP, or polio vaccines do not cause autism. Period. That science does not exist.
What they did send were a handful of heavily manipulated studies focused almost entirely on the MMR vaccine which is the vaccine at the center of Vaxxed. And even there, the data is riddled with assumptions, exclusions, and statistical gymnastics designed to protect a conclusion that was decided in advance.
This entire narrative that vaccines are conclusively proven safe when it comes to autism is built on assumptions, wishful thinking, and forceful propaganda. Not on rigorous science.
And that becomes a very serious problem when injuries are no longer rare, when chronic illness is exploding, and when parents are watching their children suffer while being told, “There’s no evidence.”
No...there’s just no evidence either way.
Pretending that equals safety is not science.
@delbigtree
Because what that statement really means is something far more disturbing.
It means there is no evidence at all.
No real science proving they don’t.
I know this because we went looking for it. We didn’t speculate. We didn’t guess. We sued the CDC. We said, “Show us the studies.” Not opinions. Not press releases. The actual trials you rely on to say vaccines do not cause autism.
We made it simple.
Just the first six vaccines given in the first six months of life.
Hepatitis B. DTaP. Polio. The basics.
Send us the studies.
What did they send back?
Twenty studies that didn’t include any of those vaccines.
Not one.
So let’s just be clear: there is no science showing that hepatitis B, DTaP, or polio vaccines do not cause autism. Period. That science does not exist.
What they did send were a handful of heavily manipulated studies focused almost entirely on the MMR vaccine which is the vaccine at the center of Vaxxed. And even there, the data is riddled with assumptions, exclusions, and statistical gymnastics designed to protect a conclusion that was decided in advance.
This entire narrative that vaccines are conclusively proven safe when it comes to autism is built on assumptions, wishful thinking, and forceful propaganda. Not on rigorous science.
And that becomes a very serious problem when injuries are no longer rare, when chronic illness is exploding, and when parents are watching their children suffer while being told, “There’s no evidence.”
No...there’s just no evidence either way.
Pretending that equals safety is not science.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Here’s a simple question every parent should feel comfortable asking when they visit their doctor: “Can I see the vaccine insert?”
If your pediatrician says, “I'm so glad you asked! Let’s read it together,” hold on to them. That’s a doctor who respects informed consent.
If you are met with defensiveness, attitude, or pressure that should tell you everything you need to know.
You don’t need special access to do your own homework. You can find every FDA-licensed vaccine insert yourself:
• Look up the CDC recommended childhood schedule
• Click each vaccine listed
• Open the package insert (the official warning label)
• Go straight to Section 6.1. You will find the safety data the approval relied on
That’s where you’ll see:
1⃣ The number of children studied
2⃣ How long they were monitored
3⃣ Whether there was a placebo group
4⃣ And what they thought “safe enough” meant
Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine, which has historically been given on day one of life. Read the safety section. Then ask yourself if that’s the standard you’re comfortable with.
You owe it to yourself (and to your child) to read what you’re being asked to sign off on.
@delbigtree
If your pediatrician says, “I'm so glad you asked! Let’s read it together,” hold on to them. That’s a doctor who respects informed consent.
If you are met with defensiveness, attitude, or pressure that should tell you everything you need to know.
You don’t need special access to do your own homework. You can find every FDA-licensed vaccine insert yourself:
• Look up the CDC recommended childhood schedule
• Click each vaccine listed
• Open the package insert (the official warning label)
• Go straight to Section 6.1. You will find the safety data the approval relied on
That’s where you’ll see:
1⃣ The number of children studied
2⃣ How long they were monitored
3⃣ Whether there was a placebo group
4⃣ And what they thought “safe enough” meant
Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine, which has historically been given on day one of life. Read the safety section. Then ask yourself if that’s the standard you’re comfortable with.
You owe it to yourself (and to your child) to read what you’re being asked to sign off on.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Peter Hotez was caught red handed… gaslighting families that have had pediatricians kick them out of their practices or worse, had protective services called on them for wanting to opt out of the CDC recommendations. Peter Hotez says that in Dr’s offices, “there was never coercion.” We know this has been happening for years, but even CBS news reported this was happening as far back as 2012… a survey by the American Journal of Preventative Medicine showed that 25% of pediatricians have fired patients for refusing vaccines. Sounds like coercion to me… who’s gaslighting now?
Nevermind the coercion that goes on at schools in states like CA or NY where your child cannot attend unless you follow the recommendations exactly.
If we want to have real conversations around the changes to the schedule, we have to start with honesty and transparency- it’s what we’ve been asking for since day one of this movement.
Come on, Peter. Do better.
@delbigtree
Nevermind the coercion that goes on at schools in states like CA or NY where your child cannot attend unless you follow the recommendations exactly.
If we want to have real conversations around the changes to the schedule, we have to start with honesty and transparency- it’s what we’ve been asking for since day one of this movement.
Come on, Peter. Do better.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
To enroll a child aged 24 months to 4 years in preschool in Connecticut, they MUST get an annual flu shot. No opt-outs for faith. So, what do you do?
MOVE. That's right. Your state has turned against you and your family. It's mandating injections that could harm your child forever: paralysis, speech delays, neurological disorders, even encephalitis (brain swelling) side effects listed on vaccines you never see.
I've interviewed THOUSANDS of parents who've faced this regret. You DO have a choice. Don't tell yourself otherwise. No 20-foot wall traps you in Connecticut or California. If you truly care about your kids, pack up. Job? Doesn't matter. Protect them first.
Unless you're ready to stand and FIGHT. I get it. I was there. But I refused to raise my family in a place where a broken arm from a tree fall could trigger Child Protective Services over a Tdap shot, discovering no vaccines, and risking medical kidnapping.
Don't live in fear. Choose freedom.
@delbigtree
MOVE. That's right. Your state has turned against you and your family. It's mandating injections that could harm your child forever: paralysis, speech delays, neurological disorders, even encephalitis (brain swelling) side effects listed on vaccines you never see.
I've interviewed THOUSANDS of parents who've faced this regret. You DO have a choice. Don't tell yourself otherwise. No 20-foot wall traps you in Connecticut or California. If you truly care about your kids, pack up. Job? Doesn't matter. Protect them first.
Unless you're ready to stand and FIGHT. I get it. I was there. But I refused to raise my family in a place where a broken arm from a tree fall could trigger Child Protective Services over a Tdap shot, discovering no vaccines, and risking medical kidnapping.
Don't live in fear. Choose freedom.
@delbigtree
❤2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Until They Produce EVEN ONE Study Showing Vaccinated Kids Are HEALTHIER - We Have a Crisis
The evidence is mounting, and the silence is deafening.
Until someone…ANYONE…produces at least one study, if not 10, comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children and shows the unvaccinated are actually sicker... this is very strong science pointing in ONE direction.
I'm challenging every nation, every major medical institution worldwide: DO THIS STUDY YOURSELF and see if you get a different result!
Let's drop the bias. Let's drop the sides. This is about OUR CHILDREN.
Are these products making our kids healthier... or NOT?
If they're NOT - if they're making us sicker- then why are we doing this?
This simple comparison should NOT be avoided. It should NOT be attacked. It should be celebrated and done by EVERY institution on Earth!
All of science is warning us: This is the first generation of children who will NOT live as long as their parents. We're reversing the course of longevity and health in our species.
If you think you're doing the right thing for your kids... think again. They're facing shorter, sicker lives.
We need an international conversation on this IMMEDIATELY!
@delbigtree
The evidence is mounting, and the silence is deafening.
Until someone…ANYONE…produces at least one study, if not 10, comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children and shows the unvaccinated are actually sicker... this is very strong science pointing in ONE direction.
I'm challenging every nation, every major medical institution worldwide: DO THIS STUDY YOURSELF and see if you get a different result!
Let's drop the bias. Let's drop the sides. This is about OUR CHILDREN.
Are these products making our kids healthier... or NOT?
If they're NOT - if they're making us sicker- then why are we doing this?
This simple comparison should NOT be avoided. It should NOT be attacked. It should be celebrated and done by EVERY institution on Earth!
All of science is warning us: This is the first generation of children who will NOT live as long as their parents. We're reversing the course of longevity and health in our species.
If you think you're doing the right thing for your kids... think again. They're facing shorter, sicker lives.
We need an international conversation on this IMMEDIATELY!
@delbigtree
⚡1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The old guard just blinked, and it changes everything.
Legacy vaccine pioneers Stanley Plotkin and Walter Orenstein, architects of the current program, published a paper admitting what we've been demanding for years: The public is no longer satisfied with "simply detecting and quantifying" risks AFTER vaccines are rolled out to millions. They want authorities to "mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse reactions" BEFORE they happen.
Del Bigtree breaks it down in this clip: "That should have been bolded... What they're saying is what we have proven: There are no placebo trials of any childhood vaccines. That was acceptable back in the day by Stanley Plotkin and Walter Orenstein. But now... because of Jeffrey Jackson and Robert Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree and others like us... we're going to have to start doing those safety tests."
This is vindication: The push for true placebo-controlled trials, long-term data, and real prevention—led by RFK Jr. at HHS—is forcing even the establishment to concede the old ways aren't enough.
"We all just want safety. And there's only one side that would prefer authoritarianism over safety."
Watch the full segment below. If you've felt the pressure to "just trust," this moment will definitely resonate.
@delbigtree
Legacy vaccine pioneers Stanley Plotkin and Walter Orenstein, architects of the current program, published a paper admitting what we've been demanding for years: The public is no longer satisfied with "simply detecting and quantifying" risks AFTER vaccines are rolled out to millions. They want authorities to "mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse reactions" BEFORE they happen.
Del Bigtree breaks it down in this clip: "That should have been bolded... What they're saying is what we have proven: There are no placebo trials of any childhood vaccines. That was acceptable back in the day by Stanley Plotkin and Walter Orenstein. But now... because of Jeffrey Jackson and Robert Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree and others like us... we're going to have to start doing those safety tests."
This is vindication: The push for true placebo-controlled trials, long-term data, and real prevention—led by RFK Jr. at HHS—is forcing even the establishment to concede the old ways aren't enough.
"We all just want safety. And there's only one side that would prefer authoritarianism over safety."
Watch the full segment below. If you've felt the pressure to "just trust," this moment will definitely resonate.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Even people who truly believe in vaccines, who want to trust the system, they're now forced to confront the hard questions.
"What happened during COVID? I know that rushed jab didn't work like they promised. I watched it get pushed to market at warp speed. So... maybe what Del and Bobby are saying is true. Were the others rushed too? Did they have proper, long-term safety testing?"
There's NO drug on Earth that doesn't injure some people - some children. So how can this product be "safe and effective" for everybody? It's not. Certainly not for all.
The real conversation has always been: Who's it not safe for? That's it. Nothing more.
I'm not trying to get anyone to stop vaccinating. What I am demanding is recognition of the known side effects. Warning labels on every vaccine (that no one reads) include brain swelling and encephalitis—which can lead to symptoms like autism, Tourette's, or even light swelling turning into ADHD. So much more research needs to be done!
Look at the explosion: In the 1980s, just before they took away liability from manufacturers, chronic disease in kids was about 12.8%. By 2015, with up to 54 vaccines (72 total doses counting multiples like DTaP), we saw chronic illness skyrocket to 54% of America's children (including obesity). Strip out obesity? Still a staggering 40%+ chronically ill.
Our kids deserve better answers, better science, and real informed consent.
@delbigtree
"What happened during COVID? I know that rushed jab didn't work like they promised. I watched it get pushed to market at warp speed. So... maybe what Del and Bobby are saying is true. Were the others rushed too? Did they have proper, long-term safety testing?"
There's NO drug on Earth that doesn't injure some people - some children. So how can this product be "safe and effective" for everybody? It's not. Certainly not for all.
The real conversation has always been: Who's it not safe for? That's it. Nothing more.
I'm not trying to get anyone to stop vaccinating. What I am demanding is recognition of the known side effects. Warning labels on every vaccine (that no one reads) include brain swelling and encephalitis—which can lead to symptoms like autism, Tourette's, or even light swelling turning into ADHD. So much more research needs to be done!
Look at the explosion: In the 1980s, just before they took away liability from manufacturers, chronic disease in kids was about 12.8%. By 2015, with up to 54 vaccines (72 total doses counting multiples like DTaP), we saw chronic illness skyrocket to 54% of America's children (including obesity). Strip out obesity? Still a staggering 40%+ chronically ill.
Our kids deserve better answers, better science, and real informed consent.
@delbigtree
❤2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"If you say it, prove it. Where is it? Post it. Print it."
Del Bigtree calls out the hypocrisy loud and clear: Mainstream media tells us "trust the experts" and "the science is settled," but when challenged, they hide the evidence.
Meanwhile, The HighWire shows our work every week: full transcripts, sources, hyperlinks, everything. Just enter your email on the homepage (under "Brave Bold News"), and we send you the complete show—videos, articles, all of it. We don't share your info; it's our charter.
This is The HighWire Protocol: Total transparency. We demand the same from every network and news agency worldwide. If someone claims "placebo trials exist for childhood vaccines," show us the proof. Don't just assert—deliver. That's what real journalism looks like.
Watch the full clip below. We're putting the power back in your hands. If you think we're cherry-picking, call it out—we welcome it.
Who's ready for real transparency from legacy media?
@delbigtree
Del Bigtree calls out the hypocrisy loud and clear: Mainstream media tells us "trust the experts" and "the science is settled," but when challenged, they hide the evidence.
Meanwhile, The HighWire shows our work every week: full transcripts, sources, hyperlinks, everything. Just enter your email on the homepage (under "Brave Bold News"), and we send you the complete show—videos, articles, all of it. We don't share your info; it's our charter.
This is The HighWire Protocol: Total transparency. We demand the same from every network and news agency worldwide. If someone claims "placebo trials exist for childhood vaccines," show us the proof. Don't just assert—deliver. That's what real journalism looks like.
Watch the full clip below. We're putting the power back in your hands. If you think we're cherry-picking, call it out—we welcome it.
Who's ready for real transparency from legacy media?
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The FDA is supposed to protect our babies from toxins in food—but Florida had to do it themselves. And the results are alarming.
In this clip, Del Bigtree and Jefferey Jaxen react to a Florida Department of Health report: The state tested 24 infant formulas, and 16 contained at least one heavy metal (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium) above federal safety standards. Mercury was in all 16 positive samples, with three formulas showing three or more concerning results.
Del: "Was that not what the Food and Drug Administration was supposed to be doing all this time?"
The governor calls it the start of their "Exposing Food Toxins" initiative - independent testing for more products ahead. "We want people to be able to make the best decision for them."
This raises the big question: Why has the federal government failed to test baby formula for heavy metals before it hits shelves? Florida is stepping up where the FDA has fallen short, and it's a wake-up call for every parent. Mom's Across America started a relay, and Florida is grabbing the torch.
Watch the full reaction below. If this doesn't make you demand real oversight, what will?
@delbigtree
In this clip, Del Bigtree and Jefferey Jaxen react to a Florida Department of Health report: The state tested 24 infant formulas, and 16 contained at least one heavy metal (mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium) above federal safety standards. Mercury was in all 16 positive samples, with three formulas showing three or more concerning results.
Del: "Was that not what the Food and Drug Administration was supposed to be doing all this time?"
The governor calls it the start of their "Exposing Food Toxins" initiative - independent testing for more products ahead. "We want people to be able to make the best decision for them."
This raises the big question: Why has the federal government failed to test baby formula for heavy metals before it hits shelves? Florida is stepping up where the FDA has fallen short, and it's a wake-up call for every parent. Mom's Across America started a relay, and Florida is grabbing the torch.
Watch the full reaction below. If this doesn't make you demand real oversight, what will?
@delbigtree
❤1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
We've witnessed the GREATEST DECLINE in human health—especially our children's—ever recorded. No genetic excuse explains it.
It's CLEARLY environmental toxins: fluoride in water, glyphosate and pesticides on crops, hormones in beef, plastics, bisphenols, forever chemicals. We HATE them all!
But where do VACCINES fit in? Major contributor? Catalyst? More science needed—but THIS study from Henry Ford Health blows it wide open!
They graphed it: Vaccinated kids? 57% chance of chronic disease in 10 years. Unvaccinated? Just 17%.
The math screams: Vaccines look like the MAJOR driver. If that's all you remove from the equation, the rates plummet!
@DelBigtree
It's CLEARLY environmental toxins: fluoride in water, glyphosate and pesticides on crops, hormones in beef, plastics, bisphenols, forever chemicals. We HATE them all!
But where do VACCINES fit in? Major contributor? Catalyst? More science needed—but THIS study from Henry Ford Health blows it wide open!
They graphed it: Vaccinated kids? 57% chance of chronic disease in 10 years. Unvaccinated? Just 17%.
The math screams: Vaccines look like the MAJOR driver. If that's all you remove from the equation, the rates plummet!
@DelBigtree
⛔️19 STATES REJECT CDC'S NEW VACCINE SCHEDULE – Aligning with AAP Over International Consensus!
Big news: At least 19 states are refusing to follow the CDC's recently updated childhood vaccine schedule, choosing instead to stick with the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) long-standing recommendations.
The CDC's changes? After a fast-tracked review comparing the US to 20 peer nations, they've slashed routine doses from up to 72 for 18 diseases (including the COVID annual booster) down to just 22-23 doses for 11 diseases. Vaccines like Hepatitis B for newborns, RSV, rotavirus, meningococcal, and flu are now case-by-case under shared decision-making—not routine.
Why the pushback? States say the AAP's schedule is "rooted in science" and trusted for decades. Critics point out AAP's ties to Big Pharma (Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) and conflicts in their immunization committee.
Meanwhile, the new schedule aligns closely with Denmark's—where infant mortality is half the US rate (3.4 vs. 6.4 per 100,000 births) and life expectancy higher—despite far fewer vaccine doses. HHS Secretary @RobertFKennedyJr says this brings us in line with true international scientific consensus, with plans for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to rebuild trust.
AAP is even suing over the changes, claiming financial harm.
What do you think—should states follow the CDC's alignment with global peers, or stick with AAP? Reply below! Share if this raises questions about real science vs. conflicts of interest.
To read the full article & dive deeper: Tap the article card below! #VaccineSchedule #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
https://thehighwire.com/news/states-disregard-cdc-vaccine-schedule-change-despite-international-scientific-consensus/
@delbigtree
Big news: At least 19 states are refusing to follow the CDC's recently updated childhood vaccine schedule, choosing instead to stick with the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) long-standing recommendations.
The CDC's changes? After a fast-tracked review comparing the US to 20 peer nations, they've slashed routine doses from up to 72 for 18 diseases (including the COVID annual booster) down to just 22-23 doses for 11 diseases. Vaccines like Hepatitis B for newborns, RSV, rotavirus, meningococcal, and flu are now case-by-case under shared decision-making—not routine.
Why the pushback? States say the AAP's schedule is "rooted in science" and trusted for decades. Critics point out AAP's ties to Big Pharma (Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) and conflicts in their immunization committee.
Meanwhile, the new schedule aligns closely with Denmark's—where infant mortality is half the US rate (3.4 vs. 6.4 per 100,000 births) and life expectancy higher—despite far fewer vaccine doses. HHS Secretary @RobertFKennedyJr says this brings us in line with true international scientific consensus, with plans for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to rebuild trust.
AAP is even suing over the changes, claiming financial harm.
What do you think—should states follow the CDC's alignment with global peers, or stick with AAP? Reply below! Share if this raises questions about real science vs. conflicts of interest.
To read the full article & dive deeper: Tap the article card below! #VaccineSchedule #MedicalFreedom #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
https://thehighwire.com/news/states-disregard-cdc-vaccine-schedule-change-despite-international-scientific-consensus/
@delbigtree
The HighWire
States Disregard CDC Vaccine Schedule Change Despite International Scientific Consensus - The HighWire
At least 19 states have moved to disregard the updated 2026 CDC childhood vaccination schedule that aligns with peer nations.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 DIRECTED BLOOD DONATIONS UNDER FIRE: Texas Mom's Heartbreaking Fight for Her Daughters' Lives! 🚨
Liz James (Founder of Blessed by His Blood) shares her raw story about her daughters who were born in China with thalassemia.
Texas hearing: Every 2 weeks, her daughters needed life-saving blood transfusions. They found perfect-match donors who turned everything around—until Carter BloodCare suddenly cut them off 2 years ago. No explanation. Just: "You're cut off. End of story."
Her girls' health plummeted. She prayed daily for a miracle. Why the ban? Blood bank officials claim directed donors are "incentivized" and more likely to lie on questionnaires—higher risk because loved ones or good Samaritans might hide "extracurricular habits."
But Liz fires back: Her donors responded to a public Facebook call—hundreds tested, a few matched perfectly. Strangers she's never met face-to-face, driven by pure goodness. "At the core of every human being, we all are created to do good." These heroes genuinely want to help kids thrive—not lie.
This is wild government overreach: Punishing compassion? Criminalizing choice in medical donations? In America, founded on freedom, we should protect directed donations, not ban them based on assumptions.
🎯 Key Concerns:
Incentivized donors = liars? Ignores the human drive to save lives.
No transparency from blood banks—families left in the dark.
Broader threat to medical freedom: Who decides what's "safe" for YOUR family?
What an eye-opener. This points to deeper issues in our health system.
Watch the full clip below 👇
What do you think—is this fair, or total overreach? Reply below! Share if you're standing for medical choice and real compassion.
#MedicalFreedom #BloodDonation #Thalassemia #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
@delbigtree
Liz James (Founder of Blessed by His Blood) shares her raw story about her daughters who were born in China with thalassemia.
Texas hearing: Every 2 weeks, her daughters needed life-saving blood transfusions. They found perfect-match donors who turned everything around—until Carter BloodCare suddenly cut them off 2 years ago. No explanation. Just: "You're cut off. End of story."
Her girls' health plummeted. She prayed daily for a miracle. Why the ban? Blood bank officials claim directed donors are "incentivized" and more likely to lie on questionnaires—higher risk because loved ones or good Samaritans might hide "extracurricular habits."
But Liz fires back: Her donors responded to a public Facebook call—hundreds tested, a few matched perfectly. Strangers she's never met face-to-face, driven by pure goodness. "At the core of every human being, we all are created to do good." These heroes genuinely want to help kids thrive—not lie.
This is wild government overreach: Punishing compassion? Criminalizing choice in medical donations? In America, founded on freedom, we should protect directed donations, not ban them based on assumptions.
🎯 Key Concerns:
Incentivized donors = liars? Ignores the human drive to save lives.
No transparency from blood banks—families left in the dark.
Broader threat to medical freedom: Who decides what's "safe" for YOUR family?
What an eye-opener. This points to deeper issues in our health system.
Watch the full clip below 👇
What do you think—is this fair, or total overreach? Reply below! Share if you're standing for medical choice and real compassion.
#MedicalFreedom #BloodDonation #Thalassemia #InformedConsent #HighWire #FightForFreedom
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Think about the parents whose children have been devastated…lost to autism, neurological disorders, lifelong suffering. What does justice look like for them?
The cold, hard answer: There’s not enough money in the world.
Admitting the truth - that vaccines can cause autism - would cost tens of TRILLIONS of dollars. We’ve already seen cases settle for $5 million, $20 million... and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
It wouldn’t just about bankrupt the vaccine program. It wouldn’t just bankrupt our healthcare system.
It would BANKRUPT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
That’s the motive behind the denial and the gaslighting. They know the numbers. They know the liability. They know it would collapse everything.
So to those hoping every injured family will one day be fully reimbursed: I wish it were possible. But line up fast, because only the first few would ever see a dime before the whole house of cards comes crashing down.
This is the scale of the crime against our children. We can’t wait for justice from a broken system. We have to DEMAND transparency, real science, and accountability NOW!
@delbigtree
The cold, hard answer: There’s not enough money in the world.
Admitting the truth - that vaccines can cause autism - would cost tens of TRILLIONS of dollars. We’ve already seen cases settle for $5 million, $20 million... and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
It wouldn’t just about bankrupt the vaccine program. It wouldn’t just bankrupt our healthcare system.
It would BANKRUPT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
That’s the motive behind the denial and the gaslighting. They know the numbers. They know the liability. They know it would collapse everything.
So to those hoping every injured family will one day be fully reimbursed: I wish it were possible. But line up fast, because only the first few would ever see a dime before the whole house of cards comes crashing down.
This is the scale of the crime against our children. We can’t wait for justice from a broken system. We have to DEMAND transparency, real science, and accountability NOW!
@delbigtree
⚡3