@DonaldJTrump signaling, on Truth Social, that he wants to know the truth about Operation Warp Speed.
Referring to the drug companies, he stated, "They show me GREAT numbers and results, but they don't seem to be showing them to many others. I want them to show them NOW, to CDC and the public, and clear up this MESS, one way or the other!!!"
@delbigtree
Referring to the drug companies, he stated, "They show me GREAT numbers and results, but they don't seem to be showing them to many others. I want them to show them NOW, to CDC and the public, and clear up this MESS, one way or the other!!!"
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“The CDC has been a disaster."
"They’ve manipulated data, censored dissent, and used science as political propaganda. Public trust is at an all-time low—what we need now is strong leadership.” — Dr. Marty Makary on Fox News recently
@delbigtree
"They’ve manipulated data, censored dissent, and used science as political propaganda. Public trust is at an all-time low—what we need now is strong leadership.” — Dr. Marty Makary on Fox News recently
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The UK Government Just Lost Its War on Your Privacy. Here's How America Stopped It.
A chilling precedent was just set—and then defeated. The UK government, under its authoritarian Online Safety Act, made an unprecedented global power grab.
They demanded Apple create a "backdoor" to break into the encrypted data of ANY user, ANYWHERE in the world. iCloud photos, messages, notes—nothing would be safe. They wanted the keys to the kingdom.
Apple's response? They refused to compromise their users' security and instead REMOVED Advanced Data Protection entirely for UK citizens. They chose to deny a service rather than build a tool for tyranny.
This is how they always operate: they sell these draconian measures by targeting "pedophiles" and "criminals." But in reality, who do they arrest? People criticizing the government. People questioning protests. People sharing "wrong" memes. It was never about safety; it was about control.
But here's the update that proves the global stakes of this fight:
The UK has BACKED DOWN. Why?
Because of direct intervention from the United States. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, alongside the President and VP, engaged in high-level talks to protect AMERICAN citizens from this foreign overreach.
The result? The UK has DROPPED its mandate. For now, our private data remains private. Our constitutional rights were defended on the world stage.
This is a stark reminder:
➤ The fight for free speech and privacy is now global. Digital borders are meaningless to authoritarians.
➤ Your security was protected because a company (Apple) said NO and a government (the U.S.) had the will to stand up for its principles.
➤ The UK's Online Safety Act is still active, creating a digital dark age for British citizens. Platforms like Gab have already completely BLOCKED all UK users to protect them from government coercion and jail time for "hate speech."
The question every American must ask: Would this have happened under an administration that openly advocates for censoring "misinformation" and monitoring online speech? The UK's best hope, according to free speech advocates there, now lies with the Trump administration.
The beacon of freedom is still burning, but it is under constant attack. This victory is critical, but the war for the soul of the internet is far from over.
@delbigtree
A chilling precedent was just set—and then defeated. The UK government, under its authoritarian Online Safety Act, made an unprecedented global power grab.
They demanded Apple create a "backdoor" to break into the encrypted data of ANY user, ANYWHERE in the world. iCloud photos, messages, notes—nothing would be safe. They wanted the keys to the kingdom.
Apple's response? They refused to compromise their users' security and instead REMOVED Advanced Data Protection entirely for UK citizens. They chose to deny a service rather than build a tool for tyranny.
This is how they always operate: they sell these draconian measures by targeting "pedophiles" and "criminals." But in reality, who do they arrest? People criticizing the government. People questioning protests. People sharing "wrong" memes. It was never about safety; it was about control.
But here's the update that proves the global stakes of this fight:
The UK has BACKED DOWN. Why?
Because of direct intervention from the United States. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, alongside the President and VP, engaged in high-level talks to protect AMERICAN citizens from this foreign overreach.
The result? The UK has DROPPED its mandate. For now, our private data remains private. Our constitutional rights were defended on the world stage.
This is a stark reminder:
➤ The fight for free speech and privacy is now global. Digital borders are meaningless to authoritarians.
➤ Your security was protected because a company (Apple) said NO and a government (the U.S.) had the will to stand up for its principles.
➤ The UK's Online Safety Act is still active, creating a digital dark age for British citizens. Platforms like Gab have already completely BLOCKED all UK users to protect them from government coercion and jail time for "hate speech."
The question every American must ask: Would this have happened under an administration that openly advocates for censoring "misinformation" and monitoring online speech? The UK's best hope, according to free speech advocates there, now lies with the Trump administration.
The beacon of freedom is still burning, but it is under constant attack. This victory is critical, but the war for the soul of the internet is far from over.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
@RobertFKennedyJr. drops a bombshell in the Senate: 76.4% of Americans now suffer from chronic disease — up from just 3% in 1950.
Del Bigtree calls out pharma’s capture of CDC, FDA & the AAP. One of the most explosive hearings in U.S. history.
@DelBigtree
Del Bigtree calls out pharma’s capture of CDC, FDA & the AAP. One of the most explosive hearings in U.S. history.
@DelBigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥 Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra drops a bomb:
COVID shots caused more harm than good—linked to cancer & suppressed data from day one.
“Not a single person should have been injected.”
@DelBigtree
COVID shots caused more harm than good—linked to cancer & suppressed data from day one.
“Not a single person should have been injected.”
@DelBigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"Fear tactics don’t belong in health. The truth is simple: parents—not bureaucrats—should have the final say on vaccines for their children."
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, spent nine powerful minutes educating Jake Tapper on informed consent, on CNN.
@DelBigtree
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, spent nine powerful minutes educating Jake Tapper on informed consent, on CNN.
@DelBigtree
⚡2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
President Trump tells his own story of vaccine injury, from the podium in the Roosevelt Room of the White House.
"I've seen it...where they go to the doctor and they get the vaccine. They get the shot. The kid is, uh, you know, badly hurt."
@DelBigtree
"I've seen it...where they go to the doctor and they get the vaccine. They get the shot. The kid is, uh, you know, badly hurt."
@DelBigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Del Bigtree Exposes New Attempt to Silence Vaccine Safety Investigation
Del Bigtree, host of The High Wire and producer of the controversial documentary VAXXED, is facing renewed censorship efforts—this time from the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS).
In a powerful new segment, Bigtree reveals that HFHS has sent a cease-and-desist letter, threatening defamation lawsuits over his new film, An Inconvenient Study. The film investigates an unpublished HFHS study that compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.
The health system claims the study was shelved due to "significant flaws in its data and methodology," not because of its results. Bigtree counters this, presenting a compelling case that the study's findings—which allegedly show increased rates of chronic disease, neurological disorders, and asthma in vaccinated children—are the true reason it was buried.
He argues that had the results been reversed, glorifying vaccines, the study would have been "rushed to print" as definitive proof of vaccine safety. Instead, it joins at least seven other similar vaxxed/unvaxxed studies that have been suppressed.
Bigtree connects this to a long-standing pattern: his work on VAXXED and his early COVID-19 reporting on lab origins, mask inefficacy, and lockdown harms were all met with fierce attacks and platform censorship. Yet, each time, the controversy only amplified his message, growing his audience from hundreds of thousands to millions worldwide.
Standing firm in his commitment to medical transparency, Bigtree premiered a new trailer for An Inconvenient Study, featuring never-before-seen hidden camera footage of his conversations with HFHS officials.
This is more than a movie; it's a front line in the battle for medical freedom and free speech.
@DelBigtree
Del Bigtree, host of The High Wire and producer of the controversial documentary VAXXED, is facing renewed censorship efforts—this time from the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS).
In a powerful new segment, Bigtree reveals that HFHS has sent a cease-and-desist letter, threatening defamation lawsuits over his new film, An Inconvenient Study. The film investigates an unpublished HFHS study that compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.
The health system claims the study was shelved due to "significant flaws in its data and methodology," not because of its results. Bigtree counters this, presenting a compelling case that the study's findings—which allegedly show increased rates of chronic disease, neurological disorders, and asthma in vaccinated children—are the true reason it was buried.
He argues that had the results been reversed, glorifying vaccines, the study would have been "rushed to print" as definitive proof of vaccine safety. Instead, it joins at least seven other similar vaxxed/unvaxxed studies that have been suppressed.
Bigtree connects this to a long-standing pattern: his work on VAXXED and his early COVID-19 reporting on lab origins, mask inefficacy, and lockdown harms were all met with fierce attacks and platform censorship. Yet, each time, the controversy only amplified his message, growing his audience from hundreds of thousands to millions worldwide.
Standing firm in his commitment to medical transparency, Bigtree premiered a new trailer for An Inconvenient Study, featuring never-before-seen hidden camera footage of his conversations with HFHS officials.
This is more than a movie; it's a front line in the battle for medical freedom and free speech.
@DelBigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
‼️UNBELIEVABLE:
XClear did the work. CEO Nate Jones had them conduct the studies. And the studies said that their product blocked the replication of COVID, RSV, H5N1, and H1N1. The FTC sued them to stop them from claiming it was effective against COVID, despite the data. Why?
Now, they are fighting back. Listen and share!
Find the links for the study and the lawsuit in the comments below.
@delbigtree
XClear did the work. CEO Nate Jones had them conduct the studies. And the studies said that their product blocked the replication of COVID, RSV, H5N1, and H1N1. The FTC sued them to stop them from claiming it was effective against COVID, despite the data. Why?
Now, they are fighting back. Listen and share!
Find the links for the study and the lawsuit in the comments below.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 @RobertFKennedyJr. announced the U.S. rejects and will walk away from the U.N.’s health declaration—but not from the fight to end chronic disease. 🇺🇸
@delbigtree
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo gives a lesson in what TRUE medical ethics look like. Pediatricians declining treatment to patients based on their decision to take or deny vaccines should pay close attention.
@DelBigtree
@DelBigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Gavin de Becker exposes the chilling engine of vaccine hesitancy: Reality.
Parents aren't hesitant because of misinformation; they are hesitant because they have witnessed a severe adverse reaction. They saw their healthy baby get an injection and end up in the emergency room that night with seizures.
And what is the response? They are told this is "normal." That seizures in babies are just a thing that happens. As de Becker notes, an adult product causing seizures would be a national scandal. But for a childhood product, it is normalized, dismissed, and buried.
The most damning revelation is that this is a known quantity. The studies exist. The medical establishment knows which vaccines are more likely to cause febrile seizures. It's written in the vaccine inserts that parents never see and doctors never provide.
But why is this considered a "very serious matter" by agencies like the CDC? De Becker points to the internal documents that reveal the true concern: not the baby's health, but the fact that the experience will cause "vaccine hesitancy." The mother who lived through that 2 AM nightmare might logically choose to avoid the product that caused it.
This isn't science; it's semantics. De Becker describes a process with the Institute of Medicine involving "no beakers, no lab coats," but rather word games. Experts literally suggested framing the findings the same way they did with Agent Orange, using carefully crafted syntax like "no proof of an association" to publicly deny a connection they privately understood.
The conclusion is not just flawed science; it is a deliberate, syntactical betrayal of public trust. And the result is a broken parent in an ER, holding a seizing child, being told the thing they fear most is their own reluctance—rather than the reality playing out in their arms.
@DelBigtree
Parents aren't hesitant because of misinformation; they are hesitant because they have witnessed a severe adverse reaction. They saw their healthy baby get an injection and end up in the emergency room that night with seizures.
And what is the response? They are told this is "normal." That seizures in babies are just a thing that happens. As de Becker notes, an adult product causing seizures would be a national scandal. But for a childhood product, it is normalized, dismissed, and buried.
The most damning revelation is that this is a known quantity. The studies exist. The medical establishment knows which vaccines are more likely to cause febrile seizures. It's written in the vaccine inserts that parents never see and doctors never provide.
But why is this considered a "very serious matter" by agencies like the CDC? De Becker points to the internal documents that reveal the true concern: not the baby's health, but the fact that the experience will cause "vaccine hesitancy." The mother who lived through that 2 AM nightmare might logically choose to avoid the product that caused it.
This isn't science; it's semantics. De Becker describes a process with the Institute of Medicine involving "no beakers, no lab coats," but rather word games. Experts literally suggested framing the findings the same way they did with Agent Orange, using carefully crafted syntax like "no proof of an association" to publicly deny a connection they privately understood.
The conclusion is not just flawed science; it is a deliberate, syntactical betrayal of public trust. And the result is a broken parent in an ER, holding a seizing child, being told the thing they fear most is their own reluctance—rather than the reality playing out in their arms.
@DelBigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The UK's Digital ID Mandate: The Blueprint for a Western Social Credit System is Now Live
While America focuses on its own political battles, a dystopian framework is being rapidly assembled in the United Kingdom. This isn't a speculative warning; it is a real-time case study in the erection of a digital control grid.
In a recent announcement made outside of Parliament—bypassing democratic debate and a vote—Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared that a mandatory digital ID will be required for the "right to work" for every citizen.
The justification? Tackling illegal migration and protecting wages. The reality? A breathtaking act of political gaslighting from a government that has overseen record migration and is now using the crisis it enabled to strip away fundamental liberties.
This is not just an ID card. It is the key that unlocks a comprehensive surveillance state:
- Your finances and transactions.
- Your carbon footprint and consumption.
- Your online activity and social posts.
- Your health data and biometrics.
The digital ID is the foundational layer. The other components are already being rolled out in parallel:
1. Live Time Facial Recognition (LFR): Cameras connected to suspect databases are being installed nationwide, allowing for real-time tracking and arrests.
2. A Weaponized Police Force: UK police already arrest ~30 people per day for "offensive" online messages. They have threatened to extradite and jail U.S. citizens for their speech.
The parallels to China's social credit system are not accidental; they are a direct mirror. China uses its vast camera network and digital profiles to control citizens' lives—banning them from flights, schools, and loans based on their "social score."
The UK is now the test ground for implementing this model in the West. The public is pushing back—a petition has garnered nearly 3 million signatures in a week—but the government is pressing forward.
The warning for the United States is clear: the technological and bureaucratic infrastructure for such a system already exists. The narrative of "security" and "protection" is the same. The distance between "them" and "us" is far shorter than we would like to believe.
This is the frontier of the battle for liberty. Pay attention.
@delbigtree
While America focuses on its own political battles, a dystopian framework is being rapidly assembled in the United Kingdom. This isn't a speculative warning; it is a real-time case study in the erection of a digital control grid.
In a recent announcement made outside of Parliament—bypassing democratic debate and a vote—Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared that a mandatory digital ID will be required for the "right to work" for every citizen.
The justification? Tackling illegal migration and protecting wages. The reality? A breathtaking act of political gaslighting from a government that has overseen record migration and is now using the crisis it enabled to strip away fundamental liberties.
This is not just an ID card. It is the key that unlocks a comprehensive surveillance state:
- Your finances and transactions.
- Your carbon footprint and consumption.
- Your online activity and social posts.
- Your health data and biometrics.
The digital ID is the foundational layer. The other components are already being rolled out in parallel:
1. Live Time Facial Recognition (LFR): Cameras connected to suspect databases are being installed nationwide, allowing for real-time tracking and arrests.
2. A Weaponized Police Force: UK police already arrest ~30 people per day for "offensive" online messages. They have threatened to extradite and jail U.S. citizens for their speech.
The parallels to China's social credit system are not accidental; they are a direct mirror. China uses its vast camera network and digital profiles to control citizens' lives—banning them from flights, schools, and loans based on their "social score."
The UK is now the test ground for implementing this model in the West. The public is pushing back—a petition has garnered nearly 3 million signatures in a week—but the government is pressing forward.
The warning for the United States is clear: the technological and bureaucratic infrastructure for such a system already exists. The narrative of "security" and "protection" is the same. The distance between "them" and "us" is far shorter than we would like to believe.
This is the frontier of the battle for liberty. Pay attention.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💉Gavin de Becker on why he wrote a book about vaccines and autism:
"All governments throughout human history use fear to control their populations, and use deceit and suppression.
On the debunking of vaccines and autism, people will say, "Well, that's been debunked." So, I ask the question, "Who debunked it?"
1⃣ So, you first find out that it was debunked by the Institute of Medicine.
2⃣ Number two, you find out that the Institute of Medicine is a paid organization that basically does crisis management for the US government.
3⃣ And number three is that the meetings, over 2001 and 2003 for the Institute of Medicine experts that they convened to debunk the vaccine-autism link, were transcribed.
So, we have the actual transcripts. The very first thing said to them by the woman, Dr. McCormick, is, "There is one line we will not cross here, and that is to find that any vaccine is the problem or that the vaccine schedule should be changed in any way."
@delbigtree
"All governments throughout human history use fear to control their populations, and use deceit and suppression.
On the debunking of vaccines and autism, people will say, "Well, that's been debunked." So, I ask the question, "Who debunked it?"
1⃣ So, you first find out that it was debunked by the Institute of Medicine.
2⃣ Number two, you find out that the Institute of Medicine is a paid organization that basically does crisis management for the US government.
3⃣ And number three is that the meetings, over 2001 and 2003 for the Institute of Medicine experts that they convened to debunk the vaccine-autism link, were transcribed.
So, we have the actual transcripts. The very first thing said to them by the woman, Dr. McCormick, is, "There is one line we will not cross here, and that is to find that any vaccine is the problem or that the vaccine schedule should be changed in any way."
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
From Baby Powder to Billions: A Chilling Case Study in How Corporations Gaslight the Public. Spoiler: The "Noble" Exit Is Always Part of the Plan.
They knew. The internal emails proved it. The multi-billion dollar lawsuits confirmed it.
Yet, we watch the same corporate playbook unfold: a product harms the public for decades, profits are privatized, and then, only after being caught and forced to pay, the company "magnanimously" withdraws the product as if it's a noble act.
Del Bigtree masterfully deconstructs this sinister charade, using the baby powder cancer scandal as a perfect case study. A company makes billions, fights the science in courtrooms instead of heeding it in their labs, and finally pays out massive settlements only after its guilt is undeniable.
This isn't an isolated incident. It is the blueprint. It reveals a system that prioritizes profit over human life, hoping we won't connect the dots. But each time this happens, the veil gets thinner. We see the pattern, and we understand exactly what we are looking at: a calculated betrayal of public trust.
It’s time we stop applauding the withdrawal and start prosecuting the deception.
@delbigtree
They knew. The internal emails proved it. The multi-billion dollar lawsuits confirmed it.
Yet, we watch the same corporate playbook unfold: a product harms the public for decades, profits are privatized, and then, only after being caught and forced to pay, the company "magnanimously" withdraws the product as if it's a noble act.
Del Bigtree masterfully deconstructs this sinister charade, using the baby powder cancer scandal as a perfect case study. A company makes billions, fights the science in courtrooms instead of heeding it in their labs, and finally pays out massive settlements only after its guilt is undeniable.
This isn't an isolated incident. It is the blueprint. It reveals a system that prioritizes profit over human life, hoping we won't connect the dots. But each time this happens, the veil gets thinner. We see the pattern, and we understand exactly what we are looking at: a calculated betrayal of public trust.
It’s time we stop applauding the withdrawal and start prosecuting the deception.
@delbigtree
❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Are We Overlooking a Simple Key to Unlocking Autism's Challenges?
The conversation around autism is evolving, and leading voices are highlighting a critical disconnect. Dr. Jerry Kartzinel, a pediatrician, and Jenny McCarthy Wahlberg, a mother and activist for her autistic child, bring a powerful combination of clinical and lived experience.
They point to a staggering rise in diagnoses, from 1 in 10,000 to approximately 1 in 32 boys today, posing an urgent question: When will this be recognized as a full-scale crisis?
A key point of contention is dietary intervention. While many physicians dismiss it, their combined perspective—from the clinic and the home—reveals a different story. They attest that a strict gluten-free and dairy-free diet has led to transformative improvements for a significant majority of the children they've worked with.
They are quick to clarify this isn't about "curing" autism, but about alleviating the debilitating comorbidities—the severe intestinal pain, seizures, and sleep disorders—that plague so many children. The goal is to remove the "ouchies and boo-boos" that hold a child back.
The described results are profound: the return of eye contact, children sleeping through the night, and a noticeable clearing of mental fog. With dietary options now better than ever, they argue it's time to look past skepticism and consider all avenues for relief.
This is a call to listen to both the clinical data and the families on the front lines, empowering them with every available tool to help their children thrive.
@delbigtree
The conversation around autism is evolving, and leading voices are highlighting a critical disconnect. Dr. Jerry Kartzinel, a pediatrician, and Jenny McCarthy Wahlberg, a mother and activist for her autistic child, bring a powerful combination of clinical and lived experience.
They point to a staggering rise in diagnoses, from 1 in 10,000 to approximately 1 in 32 boys today, posing an urgent question: When will this be recognized as a full-scale crisis?
A key point of contention is dietary intervention. While many physicians dismiss it, their combined perspective—from the clinic and the home—reveals a different story. They attest that a strict gluten-free and dairy-free diet has led to transformative improvements for a significant majority of the children they've worked with.
They are quick to clarify this isn't about "curing" autism, but about alleviating the debilitating comorbidities—the severe intestinal pain, seizures, and sleep disorders—that plague so many children. The goal is to remove the "ouchies and boo-boos" that hold a child back.
The described results are profound: the return of eye contact, children sleeping through the night, and a noticeable clearing of mental fog. With dietary options now better than ever, they argue it's time to look past skepticism and consider all avenues for relief.
This is a call to listen to both the clinical data and the families on the front lines, empowering them with every available tool to help their children thrive.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🍎Jeffery Jaxen interviewed Matthew Lysiak about his book "Fiat Food." They are bulking up food with additives to save money, and harming your health in the process.
Jeffery: "When the value of the currency is debased, the food ingredients also become cheapened, and they have bulking products, these additives just to give it substance. Food companies are quietly stuffing your meals with invisible additives not on the label to make you pay more.
When shopping, check the ingredients list for these additives that bulk up products without adding nutrition. Look for carrageenan, look for xanthan gum, look for modified starches, look for soy protein isolate, sodium phosphate, cellulose. It's just helping the companies to make the packages not smaller, but some of them actually have negative efficacy when it comes to your nutrition and health.
Carrageenan has been associated with the activation of pro-inflammatory pathways. That's not good. This study provides evidence that increased carrageenan intake can disrupt intestinal barrier function in humans. "
@DelBigtree
Jeffery: "When the value of the currency is debased, the food ingredients also become cheapened, and they have bulking products, these additives just to give it substance. Food companies are quietly stuffing your meals with invisible additives not on the label to make you pay more.
When shopping, check the ingredients list for these additives that bulk up products without adding nutrition. Look for carrageenan, look for xanthan gum, look for modified starches, look for soy protein isolate, sodium phosphate, cellulose. It's just helping the companies to make the packages not smaller, but some of them actually have negative efficacy when it comes to your nutrition and health.
Carrageenan has been associated with the activation of pro-inflammatory pathways. That's not good. This study provides evidence that increased carrageenan intake can disrupt intestinal barrier function in humans. "
@DelBigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🛑"If you do not ask, you will not see it."
They knew...
Watch Ron Johnson present a timeline exposing how the CDC & FDA knew about the myocarditis risks from the COVID vaccine, yet failed to warn the public.
Instead? They warned the manufacturers.
🛑Israeli data flagged it early, but officials dragged their feet, keeping Big Pharma in the loop while leaving Americans in the dark.
➡️Watch this video to see the emails and hear Sen. @RonJohnson break it down.
@delbigtree
They knew...
Watch Ron Johnson present a timeline exposing how the CDC & FDA knew about the myocarditis risks from the COVID vaccine, yet failed to warn the public.
Instead? They warned the manufacturers.
🛑Israeli data flagged it early, but officials dragged their feet, keeping Big Pharma in the loop while leaving Americans in the dark.
➡️Watch this video to see the emails and hear Sen. @RonJohnson break it down.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨PROGRESS: Finally, a bill making it mandatory to report the vaccination history of an infant who dies of SIDS in the state of Florida
Florida Senator Ileana Garcia has put forth Bill 188. The bill states that in the case of an infant or child who dies suddenly and unexpectedly, including cases of SIDS, the autopsy must include microscopic and toxicology studies and a review of the child's immunization and medical records.
🔥For the first unreported case by the medical examiner, a fine of $1,000.
🔥For the second unreported case, a fine of $5000
🔥For repeated noncompliance? Disciplinary action may include suspension or termination of employment.
@DelBigtree
Florida Senator Ileana Garcia has put forth Bill 188. The bill states that in the case of an infant or child who dies suddenly and unexpectedly, including cases of SIDS, the autopsy must include microscopic and toxicology studies and a review of the child's immunization and medical records.
🔥For the first unreported case by the medical examiner, a fine of $1,000.
🔥For the second unreported case, a fine of $5000
🔥For repeated noncompliance? Disciplinary action may include suspension or termination of employment.
@DelBigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
RFK Jr. says this is not a healthcare system — this is a hostage crisis.
Big Pharma’s 30-year monopoly is being challenged.
The FDA has just scrapped a $100 million rule that kept cheaper medications off the market.
Let us know your thoughts about this move.
@DelBigtree
Big Pharma’s 30-year monopoly is being challenged.
The FDA has just scrapped a $100 million rule that kept cheaper medications off the market.
Let us know your thoughts about this move.
@DelBigtree