This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Del Bigtree, in a recent segment, raised urgent concerns about the soaring rates of leukemia in infants, linking them to widespread glyphosate exposure. He noted that childhood cancer was nearly unheard of in past generations, yet today, the numbers are staggering.
Bigtree highlighted that over 80% of U.S. crops are sprayed with glyphosate, a chemical now found in breast milk, as demonstrated by studies from Moms Across America. This means newborns are exposed from their earliest moments, ingesting glyphosate through breastfeeding as mothers consume contaminated vegetables, often unknowingly.
Bigtree emphasized the difficulty of avoiding glyphosate, which cannot be washed off produce because it is absorbed into the plant. Steaming or mashing vegetables for baby food does not eliminate it. He expressed concern about the affordability of organic options, leaving many families exposed.
Beyond food, glyphosate is used on lawns, tracked into homes by pets, and transferred to children through contact. He underscored that this pervasive chemical saturates environments and bodies, urging the public to recognize the gravity of this health crisis.
@DelBigtree
Bigtree highlighted that over 80% of U.S. crops are sprayed with glyphosate, a chemical now found in breast milk, as demonstrated by studies from Moms Across America. This means newborns are exposed from their earliest moments, ingesting glyphosate through breastfeeding as mothers consume contaminated vegetables, often unknowingly.
Bigtree emphasized the difficulty of avoiding glyphosate, which cannot be washed off produce because it is absorbed into the plant. Steaming or mashing vegetables for baby food does not eliminate it. He expressed concern about the affordability of organic options, leaving many families exposed.
Beyond food, glyphosate is used on lawns, tracked into homes by pets, and transferred to children through contact. He underscored that this pervasive chemical saturates environments and bodies, urging the public to recognize the gravity of this health crisis.
@DelBigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Paul Thomas, a pediatrician with decades of experience, dropped a bombshell about the risks of routine well-baby visits, particularly the 6-month checkup. According to Dr. Thomas, this visit is “the most dangerous doctor visit babies ever encounter” due to the staggering number of vaccines—up to 10—administered at once. These include Hep B, DTaP (3 vaccines in one), IPV, Hib, pneumococcal, rotavirus, flu, and COVID.
But it doesn’t stop there. Dr. Thomas warns that the newborn visit in the hospital, where babies receive the Hep B vaccine containing 250 micrograms of Merck’s proprietary aluminum, is equally alarming. He calls this aluminum “the absolute worst” and “dangerous.”
The 2-month and 4-month visits are nearly as bad, and the 1-year or 15-month visits are now “right up there” with the addition of MMR, chickenpox, Hep A, final boosters for Prevnar and Hib, and potentially Tdap, flu, and COVID shots. That’s up to 10 shots again, including four live viruses (measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox), which carry a known high risk of seizures, some leading to lifelong epilepsy.
Dr. Thomas emphasizes that the MMR vaccine’s link to autism is “undeniable,” a concern echoed in Del Bigtree’s film Vaxxed. He also notes that prior to the COVID vaccine, the HPV vaccine held the title of “world’s worst” due to its severe risks.
Now, with pediatricians sometimes administering 15-20 vaccines at once during “catch-up” visits, the cumulative toxic load on a baby’s developing immune system is unprecedented. Babies at 6 months have limited ability to process these toxins compared to older children, making these early visits particularly risky.
Parents, this is a critical moment to ask questions and do your research. Are we over-vaccinating our children? What are the long-term consequences of these schedules?
@DelBigtree
But it doesn’t stop there. Dr. Thomas warns that the newborn visit in the hospital, where babies receive the Hep B vaccine containing 250 micrograms of Merck’s proprietary aluminum, is equally alarming. He calls this aluminum “the absolute worst” and “dangerous.”
The 2-month and 4-month visits are nearly as bad, and the 1-year or 15-month visits are now “right up there” with the addition of MMR, chickenpox, Hep A, final boosters for Prevnar and Hib, and potentially Tdap, flu, and COVID shots. That’s up to 10 shots again, including four live viruses (measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox), which carry a known high risk of seizures, some leading to lifelong epilepsy.
Dr. Thomas emphasizes that the MMR vaccine’s link to autism is “undeniable,” a concern echoed in Del Bigtree’s film Vaxxed. He also notes that prior to the COVID vaccine, the HPV vaccine held the title of “world’s worst” due to its severe risks.
Now, with pediatricians sometimes administering 15-20 vaccines at once during “catch-up” visits, the cumulative toxic load on a baby’s developing immune system is unprecedented. Babies at 6 months have limited ability to process these toxins compared to older children, making these early visits particularly risky.
Parents, this is a critical moment to ask questions and do your research. Are we over-vaccinating our children? What are the long-term consequences of these schedules?
@DelBigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Moderna’s RSV Vaccine Trials Halted Over Alarming Safety Signals in Children – A Wake-Up Call on Vaccine Development EthicsIn December 2024, a shocking headline emerged: “Safety signal in Moderna’s RSV vaccine studies halts trials of other vaccines for childhood killer.”
Moderna’s mRNA-based RSV vaccines, intended to protect infants, not only failed to safeguard them but may have made some children sicker when infected with RSV or other respiratory viruses. This disturbing finding, discussed at the FDA’s VRBPAC committee meeting under the Biden administration, reveals critical flaws in the rush to develop RSV vaccines for children.
The data is sobering. In Moderna’s phase 1 trial, five infants (12.5%) who received mRNA-1345 or mRNA-1365 developed severe or very severe RSV lower respiratory tract infections, compared to just one (5%) in the placebo group. Four of these children were hospitalized, one requiring mechanical ventilation.
Moderna paused the trial in July 2024, and the FDA subsequently halted all RSV vaccine trials for infants under 2 and RSV-naive children aged 2-5.VRBPAC’s discussion was revealing. One committee member admitted, “We don’t really understand the mechanism why” these vaccines might worsen disease.
Despite rigorous safety protocols, the safeguards failed to predict severe outcomes. This echoes a warning from Dr. Peter Hotez in 2020 about rushing coronavirus vaccines: upper respiratory vaccines can sometimes exacerbate disease, and science still doesn’t fully understand why.
This isn’t a new problem. Since the 1960s, RSV vaccine development has been plagued by disease enhancement, where vaccines paradoxically worsen the illness they aim to prevent. Historical trials saw tragic outcomes, including child deaths, yet the push for an RSV vaccine persists, driven by a projected $2 billion market in 2024 and a potential $15 billion by 2030.
Meanwhile, monoclonal antibody trials for RSV, like those recently approved, have also raised concerns, with three infant deaths reported. The ethical questions are glaring. Why are children being enrolled in trials when the underlying immune mechanisms remain a mystery? Why do regulatory agencies continue to greenlight studies despite decades of evidence showing unpredictable risks?
Critics argue this reflects a pharmaceutical industry more focused on profit than patient safety, with regulatory bodies complicit in allowing trials to proceed without fully understanding the science. This pattern—rushing vaccines despite known risks—isn’t unique to RSV.
The VRBPAC’s admission of ignorance about why these vaccines cause harm should be a red flag for anyone trusting in the infallibility of regulatory science. As one committee member noted, they’re “hopeful” Moderna’s further investigations will shed light.
But hope isn’t a strategy when children’s lives are at stake. The public deserves answers. How can trials continue when the immune system’s response to these vaccines remains so poorly understood? Where is the accountability for regulatory agencies that approve studies despite such risks?
And why does the promise of billions in revenue seem to outweigh the caution needed to protect vulnerable children?This is a call to rethink the blind faith in pharmaceutical solutions and demand transparency, rigorous science, and ethical accountability. The stakes couldn’t be higher.
@DelBigtree
Moderna’s mRNA-based RSV vaccines, intended to protect infants, not only failed to safeguard them but may have made some children sicker when infected with RSV or other respiratory viruses. This disturbing finding, discussed at the FDA’s VRBPAC committee meeting under the Biden administration, reveals critical flaws in the rush to develop RSV vaccines for children.
The data is sobering. In Moderna’s phase 1 trial, five infants (12.5%) who received mRNA-1345 or mRNA-1365 developed severe or very severe RSV lower respiratory tract infections, compared to just one (5%) in the placebo group. Four of these children were hospitalized, one requiring mechanical ventilation.
Moderna paused the trial in July 2024, and the FDA subsequently halted all RSV vaccine trials for infants under 2 and RSV-naive children aged 2-5.VRBPAC’s discussion was revealing. One committee member admitted, “We don’t really understand the mechanism why” these vaccines might worsen disease.
Despite rigorous safety protocols, the safeguards failed to predict severe outcomes. This echoes a warning from Dr. Peter Hotez in 2020 about rushing coronavirus vaccines: upper respiratory vaccines can sometimes exacerbate disease, and science still doesn’t fully understand why.
This isn’t a new problem. Since the 1960s, RSV vaccine development has been plagued by disease enhancement, where vaccines paradoxically worsen the illness they aim to prevent. Historical trials saw tragic outcomes, including child deaths, yet the push for an RSV vaccine persists, driven by a projected $2 billion market in 2024 and a potential $15 billion by 2030.
Meanwhile, monoclonal antibody trials for RSV, like those recently approved, have also raised concerns, with three infant deaths reported. The ethical questions are glaring. Why are children being enrolled in trials when the underlying immune mechanisms remain a mystery? Why do regulatory agencies continue to greenlight studies despite decades of evidence showing unpredictable risks?
Critics argue this reflects a pharmaceutical industry more focused on profit than patient safety, with regulatory bodies complicit in allowing trials to proceed without fully understanding the science. This pattern—rushing vaccines despite known risks—isn’t unique to RSV.
The VRBPAC’s admission of ignorance about why these vaccines cause harm should be a red flag for anyone trusting in the infallibility of regulatory science. As one committee member noted, they’re “hopeful” Moderna’s further investigations will shed light.
But hope isn’t a strategy when children’s lives are at stake. The public deserves answers. How can trials continue when the immune system’s response to these vaccines remains so poorly understood? Where is the accountability for regulatory agencies that approve studies despite such risks?
And why does the promise of billions in revenue seem to outweigh the caution needed to protect vulnerable children?This is a call to rethink the blind faith in pharmaceutical solutions and demand transparency, rigorous science, and ethical accountability. The stakes couldn’t be higher.
@DelBigtree
❤2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Del Bigtree, a prominent advocate for medical transparency, delivered a scathing critique of the CDC’s misuse of VAERS data to downplay COVID vaccine risks. In a recent segment, he dismantled their claim that VAERS can’t prove causation or rule it out, exposing their contradictory logic with surgical precision.
The CDC, Bigtree argues, cherry-picked data from December 2020 to January 2023, whittling down 17,000 reported deaths to just 12,000 by dismissing cases without “sufficient” records or non-mRNA vaccine links. They then compared these deaths to the U.S. “background death rate,” concluding the vaccine deaths were “lower than expected.”
But here’s the catch: this comparison is scientifically invalid without a control group—a fact the CDC conveniently ignores when it suits their narrative. Bigtree explains why this matters: true causation studies require a vaccinated group and an unvaccinated placebo group, tracked over years.
Yet, vaccine trials often skip placebos and limit follow-ups to days. Without a control, VAERS data—a voluntary reporting system—lacks context. Are 19,417 reported deaths (a staggering leap from the pre-COVID average of 400 annually) the full picture? Experts, including a Harvard study, suggest VAERS captures less than 1% of adverse events.
If true, the real death toll could be catastrophic. The CDC’s “background rate” comparison is further muddied by the pandemic’s chaos: rising all-cause mortality, mixed vaccinated/unvaccinated populations, and unreported cases. Bigtree highlights doctors’ reluctance to report deaths due to pressure or ignorance, skewing the data further.
If VAERS underreports by 90%, as some estimate, the adjusted numbers paint a dire picture—one the CDC refuses to confront. Instead of investigating autopsies or specific causes like myocarditis, blood clots, or aneurysms, the CDC sidesteps accountability. Bigtree demands real science: analyze the nature of these deaths, not just their numbers.
Why are blood clots in vaccinated children unlike any seen before? Why the lack of autopsies during COVID? These are the questions the CDC won’t touch.Bigtree’s message is clear: the CDC’s selective math and refusal to engage with VAERS’ limitations betray the public’s trust. Without controls, their comparisons are “total bullcrap.”
It’s time for transparency, rigorous studies, and an end to the “baloney” peddled in ACIP meetings. The truth about vaccine safety hangs in the balance.
@DelBigtree
The CDC, Bigtree argues, cherry-picked data from December 2020 to January 2023, whittling down 17,000 reported deaths to just 12,000 by dismissing cases without “sufficient” records or non-mRNA vaccine links. They then compared these deaths to the U.S. “background death rate,” concluding the vaccine deaths were “lower than expected.”
But here’s the catch: this comparison is scientifically invalid without a control group—a fact the CDC conveniently ignores when it suits their narrative. Bigtree explains why this matters: true causation studies require a vaccinated group and an unvaccinated placebo group, tracked over years.
Yet, vaccine trials often skip placebos and limit follow-ups to days. Without a control, VAERS data—a voluntary reporting system—lacks context. Are 19,417 reported deaths (a staggering leap from the pre-COVID average of 400 annually) the full picture? Experts, including a Harvard study, suggest VAERS captures less than 1% of adverse events.
If true, the real death toll could be catastrophic. The CDC’s “background rate” comparison is further muddied by the pandemic’s chaos: rising all-cause mortality, mixed vaccinated/unvaccinated populations, and unreported cases. Bigtree highlights doctors’ reluctance to report deaths due to pressure or ignorance, skewing the data further.
If VAERS underreports by 90%, as some estimate, the adjusted numbers paint a dire picture—one the CDC refuses to confront. Instead of investigating autopsies or specific causes like myocarditis, blood clots, or aneurysms, the CDC sidesteps accountability. Bigtree demands real science: analyze the nature of these deaths, not just their numbers.
Why are blood clots in vaccinated children unlike any seen before? Why the lack of autopsies during COVID? These are the questions the CDC won’t touch.Bigtree’s message is clear: the CDC’s selective math and refusal to engage with VAERS’ limitations betray the public’s trust. Without controls, their comparisons are “total bullcrap.”
It’s time for transparency, rigorous studies, and an end to the “baloney” peddled in ACIP meetings. The truth about vaccine safety hangs in the balance.
@DelBigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Unveiling SIDS: New Study Links Infant Liver Enzymes to Vaccine Safety Concerns
A groundbreaking systematic review has shed new light on the potential link between sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and vaccine safety, focusing on the role of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes in infants.
These enzymes, critical for detoxifying drugs, toxins, and vaccine excipients like aluminum and polysorbate 80, are found to be developmentally immature in young infants. The review also highlights genetic polymorphisms that may exacerbate this vulnerability, potentially impairing the clearance of vaccine components.
The study reveals a temporal clustering of some SIDS cases following vaccination, though causality remains unproven. Inflammation, which can suppress CYP450 enzyme function, may contribute to metabolic vulnerabilities in infants, potentially triggering severe outcomes such as cytokine storms.
These inflammatory responses could disrupt critical pathways, including the serotonin-mediated autonomic nervous system, which regulates breathing. Such disruptions may explain the sudden cessation of breathing observed in SIDS cases.
Current postmortem protocols often fail to investigate these metabolic and inflammatory pathways, leaving critical questions unanswered. This research marks a significant step toward understanding SIDS and could reshape the scientific and medical discourse surrounding infant mortality.
If validated, these findings may bring justice to grieving parents who have been told SIDS is simply an unexplained phenomenon. Further studies are urgently needed to explore this pathway and ensure infant safety.
@DelBigtree
A groundbreaking systematic review has shed new light on the potential link between sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and vaccine safety, focusing on the role of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes in infants.
These enzymes, critical for detoxifying drugs, toxins, and vaccine excipients like aluminum and polysorbate 80, are found to be developmentally immature in young infants. The review also highlights genetic polymorphisms that may exacerbate this vulnerability, potentially impairing the clearance of vaccine components.
The study reveals a temporal clustering of some SIDS cases following vaccination, though causality remains unproven. Inflammation, which can suppress CYP450 enzyme function, may contribute to metabolic vulnerabilities in infants, potentially triggering severe outcomes such as cytokine storms.
These inflammatory responses could disrupt critical pathways, including the serotonin-mediated autonomic nervous system, which regulates breathing. Such disruptions may explain the sudden cessation of breathing observed in SIDS cases.
Current postmortem protocols often fail to investigate these metabolic and inflammatory pathways, leaving critical questions unanswered. This research marks a significant step toward understanding SIDS and could reshape the scientific and medical discourse surrounding infant mortality.
If validated, these findings may bring justice to grieving parents who have been told SIDS is simply an unexplained phenomenon. Further studies are urgently needed to explore this pathway and ensure infant safety.
@DelBigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Bigtree Warns of Aluminum’s Role in Alzheimer’s and Autism, Slams Cloud Seeding and Geoengineering’s Environmental Risks
Del Bigtree, on The HighWire, recently highlighted concerns about humanity’s interference with natural systems, pointing to a hubris that assumes we can eliminate viruses or bacteria without disrupting the body’s delicate balance.
He emphasized the teeming microbial ecosystems on our skin and in our gut biome, suggesting that interventions like glyphosate—an antibiotic-like herbicide—may have far-reaching, unintended consequences by killing off beneficial bacteria.
“God knows how many different consequences,” Bigtree remarked, underscoring the complexity of these biological systems.Bigtree also referenced Dr. Chris Exley, a leading aluminum researcher often called “Mr. Aluminum.” Exley’s work has linked high aluminum levels in the brain to serious health issues.
According to Bigtree, Exley’s studies found elevated aluminum in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients, with even higher levels detected in the brains of autistic children. Bigtree raised alarms about environmental aluminum exposure, including through inhalation, and its potential role in neurological conditions.
“No aluminum, no Alzheimer’s,” Exley reportedly stated, a claim Bigtree noted he stands by. Shifting to environmental manipulation, Bigtree critiqued practices like cloud seeding, which he argued disrupts natural water cycles by diverting rainfall from one area to another.
“If you’re pulling water out of an area where it was supposed to drop naturally, that’s affecting cycles,” he said. He also pointed to more ambitious geoengineering efforts, citing Bill Gates’ reported interest in blocking sunlight by dispersing particles into the stratosphere.
Bigtree expressed concern about atomizing substances in the atmosphere, questioning the long-term impacts of such interventions. Bigtree’s broader point is that whether it’s tampering with the body’s microbiome or altering global weather patterns, these actions reflect a dangerous overconfidence in our ability to control complex systems.
From aluminum in our bodies to chemicals in the sky, he urges caution and scrutiny of the unintended consequences.
@DelBigtree
Del Bigtree, on The HighWire, recently highlighted concerns about humanity’s interference with natural systems, pointing to a hubris that assumes we can eliminate viruses or bacteria without disrupting the body’s delicate balance.
He emphasized the teeming microbial ecosystems on our skin and in our gut biome, suggesting that interventions like glyphosate—an antibiotic-like herbicide—may have far-reaching, unintended consequences by killing off beneficial bacteria.
“God knows how many different consequences,” Bigtree remarked, underscoring the complexity of these biological systems.Bigtree also referenced Dr. Chris Exley, a leading aluminum researcher often called “Mr. Aluminum.” Exley’s work has linked high aluminum levels in the brain to serious health issues.
According to Bigtree, Exley’s studies found elevated aluminum in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients, with even higher levels detected in the brains of autistic children. Bigtree raised alarms about environmental aluminum exposure, including through inhalation, and its potential role in neurological conditions.
“No aluminum, no Alzheimer’s,” Exley reportedly stated, a claim Bigtree noted he stands by. Shifting to environmental manipulation, Bigtree critiqued practices like cloud seeding, which he argued disrupts natural water cycles by diverting rainfall from one area to another.
“If you’re pulling water out of an area where it was supposed to drop naturally, that’s affecting cycles,” he said. He also pointed to more ambitious geoengineering efforts, citing Bill Gates’ reported interest in blocking sunlight by dispersing particles into the stratosphere.
Bigtree expressed concern about atomizing substances in the atmosphere, questioning the long-term impacts of such interventions. Bigtree’s broader point is that whether it’s tampering with the body’s microbiome or altering global weather patterns, these actions reflect a dangerous overconfidence in our ability to control complex systems.
From aluminum in our bodies to chemicals in the sky, he urges caution and scrutiny of the unintended consequences.
@DelBigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 AAP wants to eliminate all non-medical vaccine exemptions.
"They just rung the death knell to the vaccine program...For parents that have reasons to not vaccinate their children, they are going to seek to nationally crush their rights. It turns them into lifelong advocates, that are going to fight." - @AaronSiri
What would you do if your state banned vaccine exemptions for school?
@DelBigtree
"They just rung the death knell to the vaccine program...For parents that have reasons to not vaccinate their children, they are going to seek to nationally crush their rights. It turns them into lifelong advocates, that are going to fight." - @AaronSiri
What would you do if your state banned vaccine exemptions for school?
@DelBigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 HHS Chief @RobertFKennedyJr cancels $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development.
"After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses."
@delbigtree
"After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses."
@delbigtree
⚡3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"What greater fight for freedom exists than the right to control your own body? If you don’t decide what goes into you—or your children—then you are NOT free.
If the government can force injections on your kids against your will, deny them education, and override your choice, then your children are nothing but PROPERTY of the state.
That’s not freedom—that’s farming. We are being treated like livestock, lined up and injected with untested tech like mRNA, despite the disasters we’ve already seen. This ends NOW."
@delbigtree
If the government can force injections on your kids against your will, deny them education, and override your choice, then your children are nothing but PROPERTY of the state.
That’s not freedom—that’s farming. We are being treated like livestock, lined up and injected with untested tech like mRNA, despite the disasters we’ve already seen. This ends NOW."
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Name another industry where a product can injure a child and you’re barred from suing the maker. There isn’t one. That carve-out came in 1986.
@DelBigtree
@DelBigtree
🚨BREAKING: Washington Post reporting Susan Monarez OUT as CDC Director.
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-cdc-director-ousted-weeks-into-job-2025-08-27/
@DelBigtree
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-cdc-director-ousted-weeks-into-job-2025-08-27/
@DelBigtree
Reuters
US CDC director ousted weeks into job
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Susan Monarez has left the agency less than a month after being sworn in, a Trump administration official told Reuters on Wednesday.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TOMORROW on The HighWire!
Special Guest: Dr. @RobertWMalone
And Jefferey Jaxen Reports:
-Commonly used insecticide linked to neurological damage in children seeking liability protection
-New information on safety of EMF exposure and how HHS is responding
-Reaction from RFK on ICAN’s fight for religious exemptions in West Virginia
📅 August 28th, 2025
⏰ Thursday, 11AM PT | 2PM ET
@DelBigtree
Special Guest: Dr. @RobertWMalone
And Jefferey Jaxen Reports:
-Commonly used insecticide linked to neurological damage in children seeking liability protection
-New information on safety of EMF exposure and how HHS is responding
-Reaction from RFK on ICAN’s fight for religious exemptions in West Virginia
📅 August 28th, 2025
⏰ Thursday, 11AM PT | 2PM ET
@DelBigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas says the AAP is “all in” on vaccine mandates - calling for no exemptions in any state.
@delbigtree warns it means no parental rights and a future where “government owns you.”
Pediatricians, will you walk away?
@delbigtree warns it means no parental rights and a future where “government owns you.”
Pediatricians, will you walk away?
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"I think with this Secretary, we are on a path to it being largely parental choice....that is a major step backwards for public health." -Dr. Richard E. Besser
A former CDC Director for the Obama Administration doesn't like parents being in charge of their children's health choices.
@DelBigtree
A former CDC Director for the Obama Administration doesn't like parents being in charge of their children's health choices.
@DelBigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
At a landmark Senate hearing, Polly Tommey, a voice for thousands of grieving families, delivered a devastating testimony that shattered the narrative of vaccine safety. Her story is not an isolated incident, but a national crisis.
She walked in trusting the system. Her son, Billy, was a perfect, healthy baby who thrived, hitting every milestone. At 13 months, after a round of antibiotics, she was reassured the MMR vaccine was essential. Hours later, his world shattered. Billy was convulsing with seizures. Doctors dismissed it as "normal." But he was not fine. He is now 29 years old, severely sick with severe autism.
This moment led to the film Vaxxed and a cross-country bus tour, listening to the stories of America. What they found was a trail of death and destruction. Perfectly healthy children vaccinated, only to be found dead in their cribs shortly after. Parents pleading with pediatricians, only to have their worst fears realized.
This is the truth they witnessed:
▪️ Death: Over 12,000 signatures on buses from parents who lost children. The story of a premature baby who died after a doctor insisted on vaccination.
▪️ Paralysis: Children paralyzed from the waist down. A generation of children in wheelchairs, on ventilators, unable to walk or talk.
▪ Infertility: Teenagers from the HPV (Gardasil) vaccine whose ovaries are shutting down.
▪️ Life-Long Disability: Two-year-olds who cannot hold their heads up after a single Hep B vaccine.
They shout about measles, but the medical records—seen by Children’s Health Defense the two girls in Gaines County did not die of measles. Yet the press parrots the narrative.
This is a national emergency. These injured children will never date, never pay taxes, and require 24/7 care for life. The question for every Senator is: who will care for them when their parents are gone?
This must stop. We implore you:
➡️ End the disinformation.
➡️ Demand independent science, not Pfizer-sponsored studies.
➡️ Stop bonuses for pediatricians who vaccinate.
Thank you to Senator @RonJohnson for giving a voice to the broken. The world is finally listening.
@delbigtree
She walked in trusting the system. Her son, Billy, was a perfect, healthy baby who thrived, hitting every milestone. At 13 months, after a round of antibiotics, she was reassured the MMR vaccine was essential. Hours later, his world shattered. Billy was convulsing with seizures. Doctors dismissed it as "normal." But he was not fine. He is now 29 years old, severely sick with severe autism.
This moment led to the film Vaxxed and a cross-country bus tour, listening to the stories of America. What they found was a trail of death and destruction. Perfectly healthy children vaccinated, only to be found dead in their cribs shortly after. Parents pleading with pediatricians, only to have their worst fears realized.
This is the truth they witnessed:
▪️ Death: Over 12,000 signatures on buses from parents who lost children. The story of a premature baby who died after a doctor insisted on vaccination.
▪️ Paralysis: Children paralyzed from the waist down. A generation of children in wheelchairs, on ventilators, unable to walk or talk.
▪ Infertility: Teenagers from the HPV (Gardasil) vaccine whose ovaries are shutting down.
▪️ Life-Long Disability: Two-year-olds who cannot hold their heads up after a single Hep B vaccine.
They shout about measles, but the medical records—seen by Children’s Health Defense the two girls in Gaines County did not die of measles. Yet the press parrots the narrative.
This is a national emergency. These injured children will never date, never pay taxes, and require 24/7 care for life. The question for every Senator is: who will care for them when their parents are gone?
This must stop. We implore you:
➡️ End the disinformation.
➡️ Demand independent science, not Pfizer-sponsored studies.
➡️ Stop bonuses for pediatricians who vaccinate.
Thank you to Senator @RonJohnson for giving a voice to the broken. The world is finally listening.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Robert Malone revealed the foundational shifts happening within America's public health leadership. He confirmed a new wave of appointments to pivotal committees, signaling a direct confrontation with a deeply embedded culture.
"The Secretary (RFK Jr.) is ready to not be so concerned about playing nice," Malone stated. "Just hold on to your chair and have a little bit of patience."
He emphasized the sheer scale of the challenge: "This is a big ship... We're taking on one of the biggest industries in the world."
But this movement has unprecedented support. With the full backing of both Secretary RFK Jr. and the President, the mission to dismantle the established system and realign it with the interests of the American people is fully underway.
The message is clear: The turn has begun. "Please give us a little bit of oxygen." Patience is required as they steer this vessel toward a new horizon.
@delbigtree
"The Secretary (RFK Jr.) is ready to not be so concerned about playing nice," Malone stated. "Just hold on to your chair and have a little bit of patience."
He emphasized the sheer scale of the challenge: "This is a big ship... We're taking on one of the biggest industries in the world."
But this movement has unprecedented support. With the full backing of both Secretary RFK Jr. and the President, the mission to dismantle the established system and realign it with the interests of the American people is fully underway.
The message is clear: The turn has begun. "Please give us a little bit of oxygen." Patience is required as they steer this vessel toward a new horizon.
@delbigtree
👏2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Aaron Siri dismantles the absurdity of our public health agencies' inaction on a fundamental question: Is the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule actually safe?
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) literally asked this question in a report paid for by HHS. Their conclusion? “We could not find one study that compared vaccinated to unvaccinated children.”
Let that sink in. The official conclusion was not that the schedule is safe, but that they could find no evidence to answer the question of its overall safety.
But here’s the kicker: the IOM report explicitly stated this crucial study could be done. They pointed to the CDC’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a database with over 11 million health records that includes "thousands of completely unvaccinated kids."
That was in 2013.
So what did the CDC do? They spent a million dollars of taxpayer money—not on the study—but on a white paper to figure out how to do the study. A million dollars for a plan on a study design that any competent researcher could outline in an afternoon.
That white paper came out in 2015.
It has now been TEN YEARS since the IOM told them how to get the answer. A decade.
The most damning question: If they had conducted this simple study and it confirmed the schedule's safety, wouldn't they have published it immediately to silence all critics? The fact that it remains buried is perhaps the most telling result of all.
They have the money. They have the manpower. They have the data. They have had a decade.
What are they afraid of finding?
@delbigtree
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) literally asked this question in a report paid for by HHS. Their conclusion? “We could not find one study that compared vaccinated to unvaccinated children.”
Let that sink in. The official conclusion was not that the schedule is safe, but that they could find no evidence to answer the question of its overall safety.
But here’s the kicker: the IOM report explicitly stated this crucial study could be done. They pointed to the CDC’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a database with over 11 million health records that includes "thousands of completely unvaccinated kids."
That was in 2013.
So what did the CDC do? They spent a million dollars of taxpayer money—not on the study—but on a white paper to figure out how to do the study. A million dollars for a plan on a study design that any competent researcher could outline in an afternoon.
That white paper came out in 2015.
It has now been TEN YEARS since the IOM told them how to get the answer. A decade.
The most damning question: If they had conducted this simple study and it confirmed the schedule's safety, wouldn't they have published it immediately to silence all critics? The fact that it remains buried is perhaps the most telling result of all.
They have the money. They have the manpower. They have the data. They have had a decade.
What are they afraid of finding?
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The UK government has issued a stark directive to its citizens enduring water shortfalls: your personal digital nostalgia is a burden the planet can no longer afford.
Amid a drought, their official advice includes taking shorter showers and turning off taps. But the final point reveals a profound and disturbing priority: “Delete old emails and pictures,” it instructs, because “data centres require vast amounts of water to cool their systems.”
The narrative is now inescapable. The individual must relentlessly limit their life—conserve, sacrifice, and now, delete their memories—for the climate. Meanwhile, the insatiable engine of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence is granted a limitless pass. It is a sacred cow that must be fed, whatever the cost.
Picture the absurd, heart-breaking reality: a grandparent, sitting in the dark to save energy, meticulously deleting cherished photos of their grandchildren to free up a few kilobytes on a server farm they will never see. All to save a thimble of water for the very data centres that consume it by the millions of gallons.
There are 477 of these data centres in the UK alone. They are the true vessels of our water and energy, the new temples to which we must all make offerings. The message is clear: your life must be constrained so that their operations can expand infinitely.
We are not being asked to save the planet. We are being conditioned to serve the machine.
@delbigtree
Amid a drought, their official advice includes taking shorter showers and turning off taps. But the final point reveals a profound and disturbing priority: “Delete old emails and pictures,” it instructs, because “data centres require vast amounts of water to cool their systems.”
The narrative is now inescapable. The individual must relentlessly limit their life—conserve, sacrifice, and now, delete their memories—for the climate. Meanwhile, the insatiable engine of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence is granted a limitless pass. It is a sacred cow that must be fed, whatever the cost.
Picture the absurd, heart-breaking reality: a grandparent, sitting in the dark to save energy, meticulously deleting cherished photos of their grandchildren to free up a few kilobytes on a server farm they will never see. All to save a thimble of water for the very data centres that consume it by the millions of gallons.
There are 477 of these data centres in the UK alone. They are the true vessels of our water and energy, the new temples to which we must all make offerings. The message is clear: your life must be constrained so that their operations can expand infinitely.
We are not being asked to save the planet. We are being conditioned to serve the machine.
@delbigtree
⚡3
@DonaldJTrump signaling, on Truth Social, that he wants to know the truth about Operation Warp Speed.
Referring to the drug companies, he stated, "They show me GREAT numbers and results, but they don't seem to be showing them to many others. I want them to show them NOW, to CDC and the public, and clear up this MESS, one way or the other!!!"
@delbigtree
Referring to the drug companies, he stated, "They show me GREAT numbers and results, but they don't seem to be showing them to many others. I want them to show them NOW, to CDC and the public, and clear up this MESS, one way or the other!!!"
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“The CDC has been a disaster."
"They’ve manipulated data, censored dissent, and used science as political propaganda. Public trust is at an all-time low—what we need now is strong leadership.” — Dr. Marty Makary on Fox News recently
@delbigtree
"They’ve manipulated data, censored dissent, and used science as political propaganda. Public trust is at an all-time low—what we need now is strong leadership.” — Dr. Marty Makary on Fox News recently
@delbigtree