This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (Twitter)
If the US & Europe aren't willing to enforce a maximal sanctions regime on Russian energy, then the Ukrainians will do it themselves. https://twitter.com/FaytuksNetwork/status/2036833655339864194#m
If the US & Europe aren't willing to enforce a maximal sanctions regime on Russian energy, then the Ukrainians will do it themselves. https://twitter.com/FaytuksNetwork/status/2036833655339864194#m
💯5
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@grok @Bgrew11 @WarMonitor3: As of now, there is no known ability to jam Fiber Optic drones. Stingers will not be used to shoot down small FPV and Fiber optic drones.
The US would need hundreds of MADIS/L-MADIS, near each group of soldiers, and even then it’s an expensive vehicle that can be taken out with several drones. It’s a vehicle with a mini-gun, and can be overpowered with several drones.
Smash 2000L is a rifle, that can be used, but as seen in Ukraine, soldiers uses rifles and shotgun to shoot down drones, but there are still a very high number of causalities because you might shoot down the drones a couple of times, but the drone only needs to get through once to kill or seriously injure a soldiers.
The US will not take significant causalities if Iran does not have a significant quantity of FPV drone, fiber optic drones with a range of +30km, if there drone operators suck or they have a small quantity of them, or if US lands far away like on Kharg Island. If the landing is close or on the mainland, and Iran has significant quantities of fiber optic drones and enough drone operators, then the US soldiers will likely take a high number of causalities due to soldiers being struck by FPV drones and fiber optic FPV drones, which the US cannot defend against in a high quantity, let alone defending 8,000 drones from these drones. Thousands of troops will be exposed from the air at any given time.
@grok @Bgrew11 @WarMonitor3: As of now, there is no known ability to jam Fiber Optic drones. Stingers will not be used to shoot down small FPV and Fiber optic drones.
The US would need hundreds of MADIS/L-MADIS, near each group of soldiers, and even then it’s an expensive vehicle that can be taken out with several drones. It’s a vehicle with a mini-gun, and can be overpowered with several drones.
Smash 2000L is a rifle, that can be used, but as seen in Ukraine, soldiers uses rifles and shotgun to shoot down drones, but there are still a very high number of causalities because you might shoot down the drones a couple of times, but the drone only needs to get through once to kill or seriously injure a soldiers.
The US will not take significant causalities if Iran does not have a significant quantity of FPV drone, fiber optic drones with a range of +30km, if there drone operators suck or they have a small quantity of them, or if US lands far away like on Kharg Island. If the landing is close or on the mainland, and Iran has significant quantities of fiber optic drones and enough drone operators, then the US soldiers will likely take a high number of causalities due to soldiers being struck by FPV drones and fiber optic FPV drones, which the US cannot defend against in a high quantity, let alone defending 8,000 drones from these drones. Thousands of troops will be exposed from the air at any given time.
👍1
😁1
IgorGirkin (Twitter)
RT @falconua: Друзі, може хтось купив собі новий набір ручного інструменту і валяється старий, яким вже не користуєтесь? Приймемо на службу в ЗСУ! Або раптом хтось має можливість і бажання допомогти з цим - пишіть
RT @falconua: Друзі, може хтось купив собі новий набір ручного інструменту і валяється старий, яким вже не користуєтесь? Приймемо на службу в ЗСУ! Або раптом хтось має можливість і бажання допомогти з цим - пишіть
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@WarMonitor3: There is no point of landing on Kharg Island with troops, that only puts US lives at risk. Iran’s military assets on the island can be bombed, while the island can be under a full naval blockade, preventing any tankers from leaving or coming in, stopping 90% of Iran’s oil exports
@WarMonitor3: There is no point of landing on Kharg Island with troops, that only puts US lives at risk. Iran’s military assets on the island can be bombed, while the island can be under a full naval blockade, preventing any tankers from leaving or coming in, stopping 90% of Iran’s oil exports
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ukraine_map @WarMonitor3: It’s such an unnecessary and risky idea, anyone suggesting it has no value for the lives of American soldiers
Imagine being faced with two options, both options lead to Iran not being able to export oil, and then picking the one that’s much more risky and puts US lives at risk
@ukraine_map @WarMonitor3: It’s such an unnecessary and risky idea, anyone suggesting it has no value for the lives of American soldiers
Imagine being faced with two options, both options lead to Iran not being able to export oil, and then picking the one that’s much more risky and puts US lives at risk
Status-6 (War & Military News) (Twitter)
RT @sidhant: Russia has evacuated some its staff from Iran's Bushehr nuclear power, Rosatom CEO tells Russian media. Some Staff still remains.
RT @sidhant: Russia has evacuated some its staff from Iran's Bushehr nuclear power, Rosatom CEO tells Russian media. Some Staff still remains.
Status-6 (War & Military News) (Twitter)
RT @JenniferJJacobs: Asked if face-to-face talks are planned for Iran negotiations, perhaps in Pakistan, @PressSec Karoline Leavitt tells me she has seen a lot of speculation in reporting "about potential talks that could happen later this week." Nothing confirmed until it is announced formally by White House, she says.
RT @JenniferJJacobs: Asked if face-to-face talks are planned for Iran negotiations, perhaps in Pakistan, @PressSec Karoline Leavitt tells me she has seen a lot of speculation in reporting "about potential talks that could happen later this week." Nothing confirmed until it is announced formally by White House, she says.