Status-6 (War & Military News) (Twitter)
RT @WillUnderhill23: Iran 🇮🇷 25/03/2026
US airstrike on ammunition bunkers at the 9th tactical airbase at Bandar Abbas.
27.234068, 56.396934
Geolocation made by: @A_z_im
@GeoConfirmed @Shayan86 @EpicFuryMap https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/2036827951199670468#m
RT @WillUnderhill23: Iran 🇮🇷 25/03/2026
US airstrike on ammunition bunkers at the 9th tactical airbase at Bandar Abbas.
27.234068, 56.396934
Geolocation made by: @A_z_im
@GeoConfirmed @Shayan86 @EpicFuryMap https://twitter.com/CENTCOM/status/2036827951199670468#m
imi (m) (Twitter)
@moklasen @GeoConfirmed: this image really has some AI vibes to it.
as per proof it make sense geometrically and its features. And we saw smoke columns from another angle, but it would be nice to see some more footage
@moklasen @GeoConfirmed: this image really has some AI vibes to it.
as per proof it make sense geometrically and its features. And we saw smoke columns from another angle, but it would be nice to see some more footage
👍1
Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (Twitter)
Looks like the FY27 Presidential Budget Request will include a Future Years Defense Program, at least for Army Ammunition Procurement.
For FY26, enacted production base support is $2,204.78 million, so there's a $80.52m discrepancy there. Not sure what that's attributable to. https://twitter.com/beverstine/status/2036845548716654820#m
Looks like the FY27 Presidential Budget Request will include a Future Years Defense Program, at least for Army Ammunition Procurement.
For FY26, enacted production base support is $2,204.78 million, so there's a $80.52m discrepancy there. Not sure what that's attributable to. https://twitter.com/beverstine/status/2036845548716654820#m
The Lookout (Twitter)
@APHClarkson: This will still be an option but there are size restrictions, fully laden VLCC's cannot sail the canal, and that will have an impact on top of much longer voyages, especially to Asia.
@APHClarkson: This will still be an option but there are size restrictions, fully laden VLCC's cannot sail the canal, and that will have an impact on top of much longer voyages, especially to Asia.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@WarMonitor3: How will they deal with fiber optic drones?
If Iran has thousands of fiber optic drones, the US won’t be able to defend their 8,000 soldiers. If the US has expensive mobile systems near every group of soldiers, even those could be destroyed quickly and may not detect the drones.
@WarMonitor3: How will they deal with fiber optic drones?
If Iran has thousands of fiber optic drones, the US won’t be able to defend their 8,000 soldiers. If the US has expensive mobile systems near every group of soldiers, even those could be destroyed quickly and may not detect the drones.
👍1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ukraine_map @WarMonitor3: Landing on Kharg Island is a lot less risky than landing in mainland Iran or on Qeshm Island, since Kharg is further away.
Landing in Kharg is also unnecessary since a full naval blockade can be established, stopping 90% of Iran’s oil exports indefinitely.
@ukraine_map @WarMonitor3: Landing on Kharg Island is a lot less risky than landing in mainland Iran or on Qeshm Island, since Kharg is further away.
Landing in Kharg is also unnecessary since a full naval blockade can be established, stopping 90% of Iran’s oil exports indefinitely.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (Twitter)
If the US & Europe aren't willing to enforce a maximal sanctions regime on Russian energy, then the Ukrainians will do it themselves. https://twitter.com/FaytuksNetwork/status/2036833655339864194#m
If the US & Europe aren't willing to enforce a maximal sanctions regime on Russian energy, then the Ukrainians will do it themselves. https://twitter.com/FaytuksNetwork/status/2036833655339864194#m
💯5
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@grok @Bgrew11 @WarMonitor3: As of now, there is no known ability to jam Fiber Optic drones. Stingers will not be used to shoot down small FPV and Fiber optic drones.
The US would need hundreds of MADIS/L-MADIS, near each group of soldiers, and even then it’s an expensive vehicle that can be taken out with several drones. It’s a vehicle with a mini-gun, and can be overpowered with several drones.
Smash 2000L is a rifle, that can be used, but as seen in Ukraine, soldiers uses rifles and shotgun to shoot down drones, but there are still a very high number of causalities because you might shoot down the drones a couple of times, but the drone only needs to get through once to kill or seriously injure a soldiers.
The US will not take significant causalities if Iran does not have a significant quantity of FPV drone, fiber optic drones with a range of +30km, if there drone operators suck or they have a small quantity of them, or if US lands far away like on Kharg Island. If the landing is close or on the mainland, and Iran has significant quantities of fiber optic drones and enough drone operators, then the US soldiers will likely take a high number of causalities due to soldiers being struck by FPV drones and fiber optic FPV drones, which the US cannot defend against in a high quantity, let alone defending 8,000 drones from these drones. Thousands of troops will be exposed from the air at any given time.
@grok @Bgrew11 @WarMonitor3: As of now, there is no known ability to jam Fiber Optic drones. Stingers will not be used to shoot down small FPV and Fiber optic drones.
The US would need hundreds of MADIS/L-MADIS, near each group of soldiers, and even then it’s an expensive vehicle that can be taken out with several drones. It’s a vehicle with a mini-gun, and can be overpowered with several drones.
Smash 2000L is a rifle, that can be used, but as seen in Ukraine, soldiers uses rifles and shotgun to shoot down drones, but there are still a very high number of causalities because you might shoot down the drones a couple of times, but the drone only needs to get through once to kill or seriously injure a soldiers.
The US will not take significant causalities if Iran does not have a significant quantity of FPV drone, fiber optic drones with a range of +30km, if there drone operators suck or they have a small quantity of them, or if US lands far away like on Kharg Island. If the landing is close or on the mainland, and Iran has significant quantities of fiber optic drones and enough drone operators, then the US soldiers will likely take a high number of causalities due to soldiers being struck by FPV drones and fiber optic FPV drones, which the US cannot defend against in a high quantity, let alone defending 8,000 drones from these drones. Thousands of troops will be exposed from the air at any given time.
👍1
😁1