CRABZONE will never ask you to believe in the stupid gay MOON LANDING HOAX as a precondition to feeling white pride.
THE MOON IS A LIBTARD SHIBBOLETH WE NEVER WENT THERE
White people DONT NEED FAKE SPACE SHIT TO FEEL PROUD
there ain’t nothibg ON THE DAMN MOON
Fuck Libtard NASA shill fgots
THE MOON IS A LIBTARD SHIBBOLETH WE NEVER WENT THERE
White people DONT NEED FAKE SPACE SHIT TO FEEL PROUD
there ain’t nothibg ON THE DAMN MOON
Fuck Libtard NASA shill fgots
Americans think you have to get vaccine to protect people that can't get vaccines because something something hospitals fill up
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hey man this “solar energy” thing is pretty alright
Heading into Jupiter in Pisces like https://youtu.be/-qgzNwdkV4s
YouTube
Dj Tiesto - Traffic!
Do Blacks actually care about getting called Nigr? The language you hear them use makes it seem less than genuine. These are people who will murder their own children over a dice game and then turn around and say “when I hear that word, tis as an icicle from deepest Tartarus ‘twere piercing my very heart, and drawing the light of day from my waking eyes.”
The most basic human emotions come to them as vague and entirely physical sensations through a haze of cheap liquor and mental retardation but they all become darky Goethes when it’s time to tell whitey about the pain of racism.
The most basic human emotions come to them as vague and entirely physical sensations through a haze of cheap liquor and mental retardation but they all become darky Goethes when it’s time to tell whitey about the pain of racism.
Blacks say "THE N WORD IS OUR WORD," WRONG NIGR, it's an INDO-EUROPEAN derivation coined by MY PEOPLE specifically to call your ancestors by, and we are taking it back!
Get out there and flood the internet with HK denial materials. Ask them, why “water”? Why not “wet”? Why not “liquid”? How could Helen’s conceptions match up so perfectly with the sighted and hearing population?
What linguistic study in history ever took account of the revolutionary “discovery” of Anne Sullivan? Why was Helen never seen without a handler? Why was she accused of plagiarism when she published her first fairy story at age 7 (because it was plagiarism)? Why did she never give an actual speech to an actual audience? Why was only the Sullivan libtard circle ever allowed to get closed to her, while everyone else was prohibited from “speaking” with her? How, using Anne Sullivan’s methods, can abstract concepts be explained? How did Helen grasp Socialism and the hallucinatory angelic hierarchies of Emmanuel Swedenborg????? THIS IS A LIE!! WE ARE BREAKING THE CONDITIONING!!!!!!!!
What linguistic study in history ever took account of the revolutionary “discovery” of Anne Sullivan? Why was Helen never seen without a handler? Why was she accused of plagiarism when she published her first fairy story at age 7 (because it was plagiarism)? Why did she never give an actual speech to an actual audience? Why was only the Sullivan libtard circle ever allowed to get closed to her, while everyone else was prohibited from “speaking” with her? How, using Anne Sullivan’s methods, can abstract concepts be explained? How did Helen grasp Socialism and the hallucinatory angelic hierarchies of Emmanuel Swedenborg????? THIS IS A LIE!! WE ARE BREAKING THE CONDITIONING!!!!!!!!
Lyin’ Anne! Not how language works! Not how language works, Lyin’ Anne! Would make nonsense of all linguistic neuroscience since the 20s! Why you teaching this shit to kindergarteners? Helen Keller Hoax= grooming OUR KIDS to be retards
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
POV you just yelled “nigr” very loudly in ze public space.
Content creation is degrading for several reasons. It ignores the periodicity of the creative process and brings it to the level of unskilled labor, punctual, regular, remuneratory in proportion to presence.
“Content” is itself a degrading thing to refer to one’s work as, it is paradoxical as implying prior emptiness to be filled, but never ending, ergo it must be vapid and fleeting.
“Content creators” are stupid and tasteless lumpen who trade accuracy, quality and beauty for large quantities of forgettable, wrong, ugly nonsense and deserve our contempt on a personal level for being such shameless shiteating swine.
“Content” is itself a degrading thing to refer to one’s work as, it is paradoxical as implying prior emptiness to be filled, but never ending, ergo it must be vapid and fleeting.
“Content creators” are stupid and tasteless lumpen who trade accuracy, quality and beauty for large quantities of forgettable, wrong, ugly nonsense and deserve our contempt on a personal level for being such shameless shiteating swine.