BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO…
How Andrew told Epstein it was over. (mb)
In a BBC interview some years back, Andrew told interviewer Emily Maitlis that he had gone back to visit Epstein after the latter’s imprisonment, solely to ‘honorably’ tell him their friendship was over.
That honourable telling took nine days!
The picture above of him waving goodbye to Katherine Keating, daughter of the former Australian PM, as she leaves Epstein’s NY mansion, was on day 7.
Andrew lied to the BBC and the British public about his stay at the late pedophile’s house.
The Daily Mail has reported that, “He suggested he had stayed ‘four days’, but in truth Andrew enjoyed the pedophile’s hospitality for nine days, with the scheming financier organizing a dizzying timetable of meetings and parties – starting with a ‘facial’ cosmetic treat, the Daily Mail’s analysis of the latest cache of emails reveals. Epstein even told Andrew he had arranged ‘a car and driver for your use for the week’.”
How Andrew told Epstein it was over. (mb)
In a BBC interview some years back, Andrew told interviewer Emily Maitlis that he had gone back to visit Epstein after the latter’s imprisonment, solely to ‘honorably’ tell him their friendship was over.
That honourable telling took nine days!
The picture above of him waving goodbye to Katherine Keating, daughter of the former Australian PM, as she leaves Epstein’s NY mansion, was on day 7.
Andrew lied to the BBC and the British public about his stay at the late pedophile’s house.
The Daily Mail has reported that, “He suggested he had stayed ‘four days’, but in truth Andrew enjoyed the pedophile’s hospitality for nine days, with the scheming financier organizing a dizzying timetable of meetings and parties – starting with a ‘facial’ cosmetic treat, the Daily Mail’s analysis of the latest cache of emails reveals. Epstein even told Andrew he had arranged ‘a car and driver for your use for the week’.”
🆒2
Emails to Epstein that week confirm the presence of girls apparently ‘of school age’ – but this may also refer to University or College.
See more at
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/former-prince-andrews
See more at
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/former-prince-andrews
🥱4
SEAN PLUNKET’S "THE PLATFORM" JUST BLOCKED US LIKE A LEFTY BIT$H
By Hannah Spierer
It's not often we comment on Sean Plunket’s content. Occasionally we do and invariably he or his staffers always resort to his favourite personal attack, screaming "cookers"!
Today his fb page was complaining about RNZ publishing articles about "conspiracy theory click bait" regarding the Epstein files.
I decided to write a comment and as you will see it was civil yet holding him accountable.
Is this really a man who's platform values free speech or cares about the biggest global story?
A story that should concern every single human, given that leaders worldwide are caught up in child abuse (the most heinous imaginable), child trafficking, blackmail and all sorts of other nefarious activities?
The comments show people are awake and not happy with his own editorial decision to put the Epstein scandal in the too hard basket where he even described it as mis and disinformation.
Of course there is much that has been put out to muddy the waters, but to not even try to clarify, speaks volumes.
I was engaging respectfully with others on the page to then realise I had been blocked. This is something I would expect from mainstream media and woke lefties, not someone who prides themselves on being a bastion of free speech.
Check out my comment and tell me if anything I said deserved being blocked and shut out of the conversation.
By Hannah Spierer
It's not often we comment on Sean Plunket’s content. Occasionally we do and invariably he or his staffers always resort to his favourite personal attack, screaming "cookers"!
Today his fb page was complaining about RNZ publishing articles about "conspiracy theory click bait" regarding the Epstein files.
I decided to write a comment and as you will see it was civil yet holding him accountable.
Is this really a man who's platform values free speech or cares about the biggest global story?
A story that should concern every single human, given that leaders worldwide are caught up in child abuse (the most heinous imaginable), child trafficking, blackmail and all sorts of other nefarious activities?
The comments show people are awake and not happy with his own editorial decision to put the Epstein scandal in the too hard basket where he even described it as mis and disinformation.
Of course there is much that has been put out to muddy the waters, but to not even try to clarify, speaks volumes.
I was engaging respectfully with others on the page to then realise I had been blocked. This is something I would expect from mainstream media and woke lefties, not someone who prides themselves on being a bastion of free speech.
Check out my comment and tell me if anything I said deserved being blocked and shut out of the conversation.
🤣7💯5⚡2🙏2🎉1
Some questions posed by Brian Cates.
Who is she?
Who is she pictured with?
Where was the picture taken?
Why is it relevant where the picture was taken?
Has anyone ever disputed that the picture was taken there?
What are the implications of the picture being taken there?
Who is she?
What has she done for a living for the past 2 decades?
mb: Who she is will become very important in future when the really dark stuff comes out. Will Bill Clinton be asked about her at his hearing?
The hearing of the Clintons, by the way, will not be broadcast live as Hilary says she wanted, however two days later it will be made available to public view.
Who is she?
Who is she pictured with?
Where was the picture taken?
Why is it relevant where the picture was taken?
Has anyone ever disputed that the picture was taken there?
What are the implications of the picture being taken there?
Who is she?
What has she done for a living for the past 2 decades?
mb: Who she is will become very important in future when the really dark stuff comes out. Will Bill Clinton be asked about her at his hearing?
The hearing of the Clintons, by the way, will not be broadcast live as Hilary says she wanted, however two days later it will be made available to public view.
⚡5🤡1🍾1
Forwarded from Len Matthews
Over the past week, Health Minister Simeon Brown MP has proudly celebrated the rollout of a new service allowing midwives to administer multiple vaccines during pregnancy, including COVID-19, influenza, and Tdap.
He says it will make vaccination “easier for families” and help ensure mothers and babies are protected.
After this was floated last year, I asked a straightforward question under the Official Information Act:
What evidence shows it is safe to give these three vaccines together, at the same appointment, to pregnant women?
The answer I received should give New Zealanders pause.
WHAT HEALTH NZ RELIED ON...
They pointed to a 2021 advisory memo and vaccine data sheets. Think about that – 2021 is the BEST they can do.
That memo openly states:
“There are limited clinical trial, observational, or laboratory data on the safety… of coadministration of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines.”
Limited.
Not extensive.
Not robust.
Limited.
Sounds greeeeaaaat.
The memo also acknowledges that trials were still underway and data were not yet available when the recommendation was made.
Instead, the guidance leaned heavily on “immunological principles” and overseas advisory positions.
Translated plainly, that means theoretical reasoning rather than direct evidence of combination safety.
IN EVERYDAY TERMS...
If a doctor prescribes multiple medications, they check interaction data first.
If you buy a baby car seat, it must pass crash testing as a complete product. Ensuring individual parts are safe isn’t enough.
Products designed for babies and pregnant women typically undergo more rigorous safety scrutiny for obvious reasons.
Yet a policy now allows multiple injections during pregnancy, while direct safety evidence for that combination is acknowledged as limited.
ANOTHER LAYER DESERVING ATTENTION...
New Zealand’s own Ministry of Health has previously acknowledged that adverse reaction monitoring systems capture only a portion of real-world reactions.
A Ministry Prescriber Update noted:
“It is estimated that only 5% of all reactions are reported.”
Five percent.
Passive reporting systems depend on patients and clinicians recognising reactions and formally submitting them.
Underreporting is widely documented internationally in pharmacovigilance research.
When officials say that no safety concerns have been identified, that reassurance sits inside those reporting limitations and alongside limited trial data. Most pregnant women would reasonably assume a much higher level of certainty exists.
WIDER ETHICAL TENSIONS
For decades, pregnant women have frequently been excluded from clinical trials because of vulnerability concerns.
Later, those same women are encouraged to accept medical interventions where much of the safety understanding comes from real-world exposure rather than controlled research settings.
I’d bet good money that the comments section of this post will shortly fill with “antivaxxer” slurs and accusations of causing harm.
I stand behind what I am saying here.
This is a recognised debate in modern medical ethics.
It leads to a very uncomfortable question:
Are we protecting pregnant women from research risks, or are we quietly transferring those risks into everyday clinical use without the safeguards that come with formal trials?
INFORMED DECISION-MAKING
Real informed consent exists only when people are given honest information about the benefits, risks, and the limits of what is known.
That includes acknowledging where evidence is strong and where it is still developing.
Pregnant women are being asked to make decisions that affect not just themselves, but their unborn children. That deserves the highest safety standards we can possibly meet. They certainly do not deserve assumptions, convenience, or messaging designed to plaster over uncertainty.
And there is another piece of this conversation that rarely gets airtime.
If a product causes harm, responsibility should sit with the companies that manufacture it. That is how consumer protection normally works. It is how we
He says it will make vaccination “easier for families” and help ensure mothers and babies are protected.
After this was floated last year, I asked a straightforward question under the Official Information Act:
What evidence shows it is safe to give these three vaccines together, at the same appointment, to pregnant women?
The answer I received should give New Zealanders pause.
WHAT HEALTH NZ RELIED ON...
They pointed to a 2021 advisory memo and vaccine data sheets. Think about that – 2021 is the BEST they can do.
That memo openly states:
“There are limited clinical trial, observational, or laboratory data on the safety… of coadministration of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines.”
Limited.
Not extensive.
Not robust.
Limited.
Sounds greeeeaaaat.
The memo also acknowledges that trials were still underway and data were not yet available when the recommendation was made.
Instead, the guidance leaned heavily on “immunological principles” and overseas advisory positions.
Translated plainly, that means theoretical reasoning rather than direct evidence of combination safety.
IN EVERYDAY TERMS...
If a doctor prescribes multiple medications, they check interaction data first.
If you buy a baby car seat, it must pass crash testing as a complete product. Ensuring individual parts are safe isn’t enough.
Products designed for babies and pregnant women typically undergo more rigorous safety scrutiny for obvious reasons.
Yet a policy now allows multiple injections during pregnancy, while direct safety evidence for that combination is acknowledged as limited.
ANOTHER LAYER DESERVING ATTENTION...
New Zealand’s own Ministry of Health has previously acknowledged that adverse reaction monitoring systems capture only a portion of real-world reactions.
A Ministry Prescriber Update noted:
“It is estimated that only 5% of all reactions are reported.”
Five percent.
Passive reporting systems depend on patients and clinicians recognising reactions and formally submitting them.
Underreporting is widely documented internationally in pharmacovigilance research.
When officials say that no safety concerns have been identified, that reassurance sits inside those reporting limitations and alongside limited trial data. Most pregnant women would reasonably assume a much higher level of certainty exists.
WIDER ETHICAL TENSIONS
For decades, pregnant women have frequently been excluded from clinical trials because of vulnerability concerns.
Later, those same women are encouraged to accept medical interventions where much of the safety understanding comes from real-world exposure rather than controlled research settings.
I’d bet good money that the comments section of this post will shortly fill with “antivaxxer” slurs and accusations of causing harm.
I stand behind what I am saying here.
This is a recognised debate in modern medical ethics.
It leads to a very uncomfortable question:
Are we protecting pregnant women from research risks, or are we quietly transferring those risks into everyday clinical use without the safeguards that come with formal trials?
INFORMED DECISION-MAKING
Real informed consent exists only when people are given honest information about the benefits, risks, and the limits of what is known.
That includes acknowledging where evidence is strong and where it is still developing.
Pregnant women are being asked to make decisions that affect not just themselves, but their unborn children. That deserves the highest safety standards we can possibly meet. They certainly do not deserve assumptions, convenience, or messaging designed to plaster over uncertainty.
And there is another piece of this conversation that rarely gets airtime.
If a product causes harm, responsibility should sit with the companies that manufacture it. That is how consumer protection normally works. It is how we
🤬22🙏3💔3
Forwarded from Alexia
To whom it may concern,
This letter serves to formally highlight a pattern of consolidated power and infrastructure integration within New Zealand that is currently being shielded from meaningful public oversight. We wish to draw urgent attention to the role of Wayne Eagleson, his associates, and the multi-billion dollar plan involving our energy grid, satellite technology, and digital identity.
1. The Facilitator: Wayne Eagleson and the "Uniparty" Nexus
Wayne Eagleson, former Chief of Staff to Prime Ministers John Key and Bill English, currently operates as a Director at the lobbying firm Thompson Lewis. His partner, GJ Thompson, was the Chief of Staff to Jacinda Ardern. This firm represents a "revolving door" where the highest level of political access is sold to private interests regardless of which party is in power.
The Conflict: In late 2023, while acting as a private lobbyist for corporate interests, Eagleson was hired to interview and select the staff for the incoming National-led government. This allowed a private fixer to hand-pick the very aides and advisors who now control access to the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
The Influence: Eagleson’s firm has been paid hundreds of thousands in taxpayer funds by Transpower to "manage narratives" during power crises and to limit the release of information under the Official Information Act (OIA).
2. The Infrastructure: Energy, Satellites, and Lockheed Martin
A massive, $1.4 billion investment is currently integrating New Zealand’s energy grid with foreign-controlled satellite technology under the SouthPAN (Southern Positioning Augmentation Network) project.
The Military Connection: The contract for SouthPAN was awarded to Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest defense contractor.
The Integration: SouthPAN ground stations (such as the Awarua facility) require high-priority, 24/7 access to the national grid. While the public faces rising power costs, the grid is being "optimized" to prioritize the needs of this high-precision satellite uplink.
The Secrecy: Much of the Lockheed Martin contract and the "Ground-Based Space Infrastructure" laws passed in 2025 are shielded by "Commercial in Confidence" clauses, preventing the public from knowing the true extent of foreign control over NZ’s positioning and timing data.
3. The 2026 Plan: Digital ID and Total Visibility
The final layer of this plan is the rollout of the Digital ID framework in early 2026.
The Rollout: Through the Govt.nz app and "Digital Wallet," the government is centralizing driver’s licenses, identity, and healthcare access into a single digital point.
The Intersection: This Digital ID is the "key" to the new "Smart Grid" and the "Consumer Data Right" energy reforms. By 2026, participation in the energy market and basic government services will increasingly require a verified digital identity.
The Geofence: The 10cm accuracy provided by Lockheed’s SouthPAN creates a high-precision digital "fence" that allows for the real-time tracking of assets and individuals integrated into this digital ecosystem.
Conclusion: What is Being Withheld
The public is being told these are separate "upgrades" for convenience. In reality, they are an interlocking system of Control and Surveillance managed by a small circle of unelected "fixers" like Wayne Eagleson.
We demand transparency regarding the lobbying registers of Thompson Lewis, the full disclosure of the Lockheed Martin SouthPAN service agreements, and a public debate on the mandatory nature of the 2026 Digital ID rollout
This letter serves to formally highlight a pattern of consolidated power and infrastructure integration within New Zealand that is currently being shielded from meaningful public oversight. We wish to draw urgent attention to the role of Wayne Eagleson, his associates, and the multi-billion dollar plan involving our energy grid, satellite technology, and digital identity.
1. The Facilitator: Wayne Eagleson and the "Uniparty" Nexus
Wayne Eagleson, former Chief of Staff to Prime Ministers John Key and Bill English, currently operates as a Director at the lobbying firm Thompson Lewis. His partner, GJ Thompson, was the Chief of Staff to Jacinda Ardern. This firm represents a "revolving door" where the highest level of political access is sold to private interests regardless of which party is in power.
The Conflict: In late 2023, while acting as a private lobbyist for corporate interests, Eagleson was hired to interview and select the staff for the incoming National-led government. This allowed a private fixer to hand-pick the very aides and advisors who now control access to the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
The Influence: Eagleson’s firm has been paid hundreds of thousands in taxpayer funds by Transpower to "manage narratives" during power crises and to limit the release of information under the Official Information Act (OIA).
2. The Infrastructure: Energy, Satellites, and Lockheed Martin
A massive, $1.4 billion investment is currently integrating New Zealand’s energy grid with foreign-controlled satellite technology under the SouthPAN (Southern Positioning Augmentation Network) project.
The Military Connection: The contract for SouthPAN was awarded to Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest defense contractor.
The Integration: SouthPAN ground stations (such as the Awarua facility) require high-priority, 24/7 access to the national grid. While the public faces rising power costs, the grid is being "optimized" to prioritize the needs of this high-precision satellite uplink.
The Secrecy: Much of the Lockheed Martin contract and the "Ground-Based Space Infrastructure" laws passed in 2025 are shielded by "Commercial in Confidence" clauses, preventing the public from knowing the true extent of foreign control over NZ’s positioning and timing data.
3. The 2026 Plan: Digital ID and Total Visibility
The final layer of this plan is the rollout of the Digital ID framework in early 2026.
The Rollout: Through the Govt.nz app and "Digital Wallet," the government is centralizing driver’s licenses, identity, and healthcare access into a single digital point.
The Intersection: This Digital ID is the "key" to the new "Smart Grid" and the "Consumer Data Right" energy reforms. By 2026, participation in the energy market and basic government services will increasingly require a verified digital identity.
The Geofence: The 10cm accuracy provided by Lockheed’s SouthPAN creates a high-precision digital "fence" that allows for the real-time tracking of assets and individuals integrated into this digital ecosystem.
Conclusion: What is Being Withheld
The public is being told these are separate "upgrades" for convenience. In reality, they are an interlocking system of Control and Surveillance managed by a small circle of unelected "fixers" like Wayne Eagleson.
We demand transparency regarding the lobbying registers of Thompson Lewis, the full disclosure of the Lockheed Martin SouthPAN service agreements, and a public debate on the mandatory nature of the 2026 Digital ID rollout
🤬13🆒1
Forwarded from Chris/Kiwi Patriot
New Zealand is far more significant on the world stage than people realise. You've probably heard the saying that we are a testing ground for new tech ie mobile phones.
Jacinda and Chris Hipkins are members of the World Socialist leaders, they meet annually and plan how to globally implement their socialist ideals.
It's very important to powerful people that their message to the public of a country is delivered according to their plans.
New Zealand and Australia were leading the world in development and implementation digital ID during COVID, this was very important to powerful people.
The social control mechanism to make people accept this new level of surveillance were developed through Jacinda's "be kind" social programming and Dan Andrew's "Tyrannical" counter approach.
The success and failure of these methods being implemented was monitored and will be tweeked by think tanks for future development.
Jacinda and Chris Hipkins are members of the World Socialist leaders, they meet annually and plan how to globally implement their socialist ideals.
It's very important to powerful people that their message to the public of a country is delivered according to their plans.
New Zealand and Australia were leading the world in development and implementation digital ID during COVID, this was very important to powerful people.
The social control mechanism to make people accept this new level of surveillance were developed through Jacinda's "be kind" social programming and Dan Andrew's "Tyrannical" counter approach.
The success and failure of these methods being implemented was monitored and will be tweeked by think tanks for future development.
🤬16💩6
TARRANT FILES APPEAL APPLICATION, SAYS HE WAS FORCED TO PLEAD GUILTY, INDUCED BY PRISON TORTURE
RNZ reports:
Before his August 2020 sentencing the terrorist had expressed some remorse for his actions to a report writer.
He now claimed it was because of the isolation of his confinement and poor mental state.
"I did express some remorse. I would now say that was induced by the prison conditions, I was irrational," the terrorist said.
"It was actually real but it was induced by the prison conditions inducing the irrationality."
The terrorist is housed in the specialist prisoners of extreme risk unit at Auckland Prison and has little interaction with other people, including fellow prisoners.
He was not asked if he still felt any remorse for the massacre but the court heard he had intended to plead guilty at an even earlier date, with paperwork prepared in August 2019.
The court heard the lawyers acting for him at the time raised no concerns about his ability to provide instructions.
Crown solicitor Barnaby Hawes asked the terrorist if they agreed with the lawyers' recollection.
"Yes, they do say that," Tarrant responded.
"They also say you intended to plead guilty before trial - there was going to be no trial?" Hawes asked.
"They do say that - they do. I don't know why," the terrorist responded.
He now claimed his thinking was clouded at that point by his poor mental state as a result of his imprisonment.
"I would say it was a decision induced by the conditions. It was a decision I irrationally made," he said.
The terrorist claimed to have changed his mind again and not plead guilty after being provided with a book that improved his mental health.
"When the conditions changed I realised I didn't want to plead guilty or that I had no change in beliefs. It was just the prison conditions making me want to do this," he said.
The court heard the terrorist claimed he was "utterly destablised" by his prison conditions but his claims were also called into question by reports written ahead of his sentencing.
Psychological assessments found he was fit to stand trial and fit to enter his pleas.
The court heard he asked one report writer to specifically assess his fitness to enter guilty pleas.
"I don't recall spending much time on that at all," the terrorist claimed on Monday.
"I think he asked me why I pleaded guilty and I explained my thought process for why I pleaded guilty and I think that's what in the report."
He claimed his prevarication on his mental health and aspects of the criminal process demonstrated his poor mental state.
His guilty pleas came in a rush in late March 2020.
As the country entered lockdown because of the Covid 19 pandemic, Tarrant pleaded guilty to all charges.
The court was only advised two days before that a hearing was necessary but he now claimed he was forced into the decision.
The court heard he feared if represented himself at trial he would "make a fool of myself by twitching, shaking or being unable to speak".
"I was forced to do it. If I could have had any other option I would have taken the other option," Tarrant told the court.
Asked if he had other options, such as seeking an adjournment, he responded: "Not really. With my unstable mental health and my fluctuating beliefs it would have been a nightmare".
RNZ reports:
Before his August 2020 sentencing the terrorist had expressed some remorse for his actions to a report writer.
He now claimed it was because of the isolation of his confinement and poor mental state.
"I did express some remorse. I would now say that was induced by the prison conditions, I was irrational," the terrorist said.
"It was actually real but it was induced by the prison conditions inducing the irrationality."
The terrorist is housed in the specialist prisoners of extreme risk unit at Auckland Prison and has little interaction with other people, including fellow prisoners.
He was not asked if he still felt any remorse for the massacre but the court heard he had intended to plead guilty at an even earlier date, with paperwork prepared in August 2019.
The court heard the lawyers acting for him at the time raised no concerns about his ability to provide instructions.
Crown solicitor Barnaby Hawes asked the terrorist if they agreed with the lawyers' recollection.
"Yes, they do say that," Tarrant responded.
"They also say you intended to plead guilty before trial - there was going to be no trial?" Hawes asked.
"They do say that - they do. I don't know why," the terrorist responded.
He now claimed his thinking was clouded at that point by his poor mental state as a result of his imprisonment.
"I would say it was a decision induced by the conditions. It was a decision I irrationally made," he said.
The terrorist claimed to have changed his mind again and not plead guilty after being provided with a book that improved his mental health.
"When the conditions changed I realised I didn't want to plead guilty or that I had no change in beliefs. It was just the prison conditions making me want to do this," he said.
The court heard the terrorist claimed he was "utterly destablised" by his prison conditions but his claims were also called into question by reports written ahead of his sentencing.
Psychological assessments found he was fit to stand trial and fit to enter his pleas.
The court heard he asked one report writer to specifically assess his fitness to enter guilty pleas.
"I don't recall spending much time on that at all," the terrorist claimed on Monday.
"I think he asked me why I pleaded guilty and I explained my thought process for why I pleaded guilty and I think that's what in the report."
He claimed his prevarication on his mental health and aspects of the criminal process demonstrated his poor mental state.
His guilty pleas came in a rush in late March 2020.
As the country entered lockdown because of the Covid 19 pandemic, Tarrant pleaded guilty to all charges.
The court was only advised two days before that a hearing was necessary but he now claimed he was forced into the decision.
The court heard he feared if represented himself at trial he would "make a fool of myself by twitching, shaking or being unable to speak".
"I was forced to do it. If I could have had any other option I would have taken the other option," Tarrant told the court.
Asked if he had other options, such as seeking an adjournment, he responded: "Not really. With my unstable mental health and my fluctuating beliefs it would have been a nightmare".
Forwarded from Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NEW: Health Sec Kennedy gives a REALITY CHECK: “Food is affecting everything that we do. This is warfare. If a foreign enemy or adversary did this to our country, poisoned our children at mass scale, we'd consider it an act of war. Americans have to be the CEO of their own health, we're equipping them with the tools to do that.”
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
🍾4🤮1💊1
The Fifth Amendment was invoked by Ghislaine Maxwell less than an hour into her House Oversight Committee deposition Monday morning, bringing the session to an early end.
Ghislaine Maxwell is far more important than Epstein. She, daughter of Robert Maxwell, was deeply involved with Mossad as was her father. Epstein became involved through her, but she and her dad were the big fishes, not him.
Robert Maxwell was killed by Mossad when he tried to extort money from the Israeli government but was still given full honours in death and is regarded as a hero by Israel.
So Ghislaine is the living link (ignoring for the moment that Geoffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself) between Isreal and all the criminality, child-trafficking and blackmail that we are witnessing coming forward.
Imagine the testimony she could have given.
Of course she wasn’t going to testify to Isreal’s role is blackmail over the years. She says she will only give testimony if Trump gives her clemancy. (mb)
Ghislaine Maxwell is far more important than Epstein. She, daughter of Robert Maxwell, was deeply involved with Mossad as was her father. Epstein became involved through her, but she and her dad were the big fishes, not him.
Robert Maxwell was killed by Mossad when he tried to extort money from the Israeli government but was still given full honours in death and is regarded as a hero by Israel.
So Ghislaine is the living link (ignoring for the moment that Geoffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself) between Isreal and all the criminality, child-trafficking and blackmail that we are witnessing coming forward.
Imagine the testimony she could have given.
Of course she wasn’t going to testify to Isreal’s role is blackmail over the years. She says she will only give testimony if Trump gives her clemancy. (mb)
🤣5
Forwarded from ️ PATRIOT NEWS ️
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Glory to God ❤️🔥
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤🔥14
Forwarded from The Vigilant Fox 🦊
CDC Study Finds COVID Shots Increase Risk of a Leading Cause of Maternal and Fetal Death by 24%
The numbers don’t lie.
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/cdc-study-finds-covid-shots-increase
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
The numbers don’t lie.
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/cdc-study-finds-covid-shots-increase
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Vigilantfox
CDC Study Finds COVID Shots Increase Risk of a Leading Cause of Maternal and Fetal Death by 24%
The numbers don’t lie.
🙏4😭2🤣1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What do you guys think the major event coming shortly is?
Many internationally are speaking about this.
Now one of our own politicians has mentioned this coming event.
Are you prepared?
Many internationally are speaking about this.
Now one of our own politicians has mentioned this coming event.
Are you prepared?
💯13🍾4👀2⚡1
Forwarded from Nick Sortor
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 RFK JR: “We need to change what we're feeding children or we're going to lose our country!”
“40¢ out of every tax dollar is going to treat diet-induced chronic diseases”
“70% of food our kids eat are ultra-processed, and it’s KlLLING THEM”
INSANE!
“40¢ out of every tax dollar is going to treat diet-induced chronic diseases”
“70% of food our kids eat are ultra-processed, and it’s KlLLING THEM”
INSANE!
🙏8⚡1🕊1
Forwarded from LauraAboli (Laura Aboli)
“The Epstein victim SuperBowl commercial was made by a group funded by Bill Gates under the Tides umbrella, who also funded Ghislaine Maxwell’s Terramar project
They try to frame Trump when he’s the one who took down Epstien
That’s why he calls it a hoax”
https://x.com/kagdrogo/status/2021008129488785884?s=46
They try to frame Trump when he’s the one who took down Epstien
That’s why he calls it a hoax”
https://x.com/kagdrogo/status/2021008129488785884?s=46
💯11🤡6
Forwarded from Police frequency
BREAKING: Unsealed court documents detail how Trump called the police about Jeffrey Epstein in 2006 where he described Ghislaine Maxwell as Epstein’s evil “operative”.
Benny Johnson
Benny Johnson
💯12🕊2🤡1🤣1