Here are a whole crop of other people’s drops regarding latest effects of the Epstein Files. Sorry, no time for own thoughts today, but these are very convincing that we are very much getting somewhere on the long road of bringing down the deep state (mb)

So we have… Peter Mandelson being questioned in the next few days over Epstein links.

Hillary Clinton wanting her testimony on Epstein to be televised and public.

The World Economic Forum is investigating its CEO to clarify his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

And, King Charles getting heckled on the streets in Essex today, over his brother’s connections to paedophile Epstein.

Happy Thursday everyone🍿

https://x.com/real_shirelass/status/2019472852102295854?s=46

Much I don’t agree on with Icke, but when it comes to the children, this man has been shouting from the rooftops about paedophilia within the establishment for over 30 years, and now he’s being vindicated. He shared my post yesterday….saying that it took 17 years for Wiltshire police to investigate allegations of abuse against Ted Heath. Heath was a Satanist and close friends with Saville. Which 17 I find interesting.

Did you know….The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has blocked an attempt to uncover documents detailing a 1982 raid on Elm Guest House.

I’m wondering if these documents have been blocked for a reason….waiting till the big truths come out on Epstein, Mandelson, Andrew and Blair etc…because of the magnitude of the trafficking and child SRA happening in this country and who’s involved. I do feel they are going to expose what was happening to the children all them years ago, it’s been happening well before Epstein. It seems that the UK is the epicentre in all this evil.

🚨HOLY SHIT!!!! Prince William now in the spotlight…..Paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, donated $50,000 as a gift to Prince William’s charity WildAid in November 2013, several years after Epstein was convicted for procuring a child for prostitution.

WildAid is connected to Prince William who is Ambassador to the charity, David Beckham and King Charles.

The charity courted Epstein for further donations after the initial $50,000 gift.

The scandals and exposure just keep on coming.

https://x.com/real_shirelass/status/2019753582753391076?s=46

Trump’s comments on Bill Clinton today
aren’t surprising

We were told POTUS must remain neutral for pure optical reasons as people begin to be indicted.

Trump is the one who set this entire thing in motion. By distancing himself, he psyopped his haters into taking the red pill about Pizzagate and Epstein. People still haven’t learned that he trolls the media into covering things they otherwise wouldn’t touch if they think they can use it to “get Trump.” Many such cases, works every time. If Trump says leave Clinton alone, then liberals will think he must be guilty and it won’t look like a partisan persecution when he is prosecuted.

That said, 2020 election theft and RussiaGate arrests have to happen first before any further high level Epstein arrests, beyond those that already happened in his first term, (Epstein, Ghislaine, Brunell, Nyguard, NXVIM, Raniere, Bronfman, Allison Mack, Nancy Salzman, Lauren Salzman, Kathy Russell, etc.)

In chess, you remove pawns, rooks, knights, bishops, queen before “king.” Same with RICO.

That’s why Q said
“we are saving Israel for last.”

https://x.com/kagdrogo/status/2019471684403884070?s=46

Trump just posted this video of Julian Assange saying he has no dirt on Trump.

There’s a Q flag and WWG1WGA at the end.

https://x.com/kagdrogo/status/2019673620386394528?s=46

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116021978407635348

Whew! No wonder Albert Bourla, Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Peter Hotez, Peter Marks, Ashish Jha, and Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus ALL declare — with absolute certainty — that another pandemic is imminent!

Two very BIG casualties of the Epstein files in the UK. PM KEIR STARMER said to be about to be replaced as PM (by another puppet but that is still progress) and PETER MANDELSTAM’s house in Camden being raided by police. See the information in the two articles from The Gateway Pundit below:

Failing Starmer’s Impending Removal Dominates the Headlines in the UK, as His Allies Warn That a Labour ‘Coup’ by Former Minister Raynes Will Trigger a General Election

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/failing-starmers-impending-removal-dominates-headlines-uk-as/

‘PRINCE OF DARKNESS’: British Police Carry Out Searches in Peter Mandelson’s Properties Amid Criminal Investigation Into ‘Misconduct in Public Office’ Over Epstein Ties

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/prince-darkness-british-police-carry-searches-peter-mandelsons/

Update from Barry Young's call over recently

BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO…

How Andrew told Epstein it was over. (mb)

In a BBC interview some years back, Andrew told interviewer Emily Maitlis that he had gone back to visit Epstein after the latter’s imprisonment, solely to ‘honorably’ tell him their friendship was over.

That honourable telling took nine days!

The picture above of him waving goodbye to Katherine Keating, daughter of the former Australian PM, as she leaves Epstein’s NY mansion, was on day 7.

Andrew lied to the BBC and the British public about his stay at the late pedophile’s house.

The Daily Mail has reported that, “He suggested he had stayed ‘four days’, but in truth Andrew enjoyed the pedophile’s hospitality for nine days, with the scheming financier organizing a dizzying timetable of meetings and parties – starting with a ‘facial’ cosmetic treat, the Daily Mail’s analysis of the latest cache of emails reveals. Epstein even told Andrew he had arranged ‘a car and driver for your use for the week’.”

Emails to Epstein that week confirm the presence of girls apparently ‘of school age’ – but this may also refer to University or College.

See more at
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/former-prince-andrews

Some questions posed by Brian Cates.

Who is she?

Who is she pictured with?

Where was the picture taken?

Why is it relevant where the picture was taken?

Has anyone ever disputed that the picture was taken there?

What are the implications of the picture being taken there?

Who is she?

What has she done for a living for the past 2 decades?


mb: Who she is will become very important in future when the really dark stuff comes out. Will Bill Clinton be asked about her at his hearing?

The hearing of the Clintons, by the way, will not be broadcast live as Hilary says she wanted, however two days later it will be made available to public view.

Over the past week, Health Minister Simeon Brown MP has proudly celebrated the rollout of a new service allowing midwives to administer multiple vaccines during pregnancy, including COVID-19, influenza, and Tdap.

He says it will make vaccination “easier for families” and help ensure mothers and babies are protected.

After this was floated last year, I asked a straightforward question under the Official Information Act:

What evidence shows it is safe to give these three vaccines together, at the same appointment, to pregnant women?

The answer I received should give New Zealanders pause.

WHAT HEALTH NZ RELIED ON...

They pointed to a 2021 advisory memo and vaccine data sheets. Think about that – 2021 is the BEST they can do.

That memo openly states:

“There are limited clinical trial, observational, or laboratory data on the safety… of coadministration of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines.”

Limited.

Not extensive.
Not robust.

Limited.

Sounds greeeeaaaat.

The memo also acknowledges that trials were still underway and data were not yet available when the recommendation was made.

Instead, the guidance leaned heavily on “immunological principles” and overseas advisory positions.

Translated plainly, that means theoretical reasoning rather than direct evidence of combination safety.

IN EVERYDAY TERMS...

If a doctor prescribes multiple medications, they check interaction data first.

If you buy a baby car seat, it must pass crash testing as a complete product. Ensuring individual parts are safe isn’t enough.

Products designed for babies and pregnant women typically undergo more rigorous safety scrutiny for obvious reasons.

Yet a policy now allows multiple injections during pregnancy, while direct safety evidence for that combination is acknowledged as limited.

ANOTHER LAYER DESERVING ATTENTION...

New Zealand’s own Ministry of Health has previously acknowledged that adverse reaction monitoring systems capture only a portion of real-world reactions.

A Ministry Prescriber Update noted:

“It is estimated that only 5% of all reactions are reported.”

Five percent.

Passive reporting systems depend on patients and clinicians recognising reactions and formally submitting them.

Underreporting is widely documented internationally in pharmacovigilance research.

When officials say that no safety concerns have been identified, that reassurance sits inside those reporting limitations and alongside limited trial data. Most pregnant women would reasonably assume a much higher level of certainty exists.

WIDER ETHICAL TENSIONS

For decades, pregnant women have frequently been excluded from clinical trials because of vulnerability concerns.

Later, those same women are encouraged to accept medical interventions where much of the safety understanding comes from real-world exposure rather than controlled research settings.

I’d bet good money that the comments section of this post will shortly fill with “antivaxxer” slurs and accusations of causing harm.

I stand behind what I am saying here.

This is a recognised debate in modern medical ethics.

It leads to a very uncomfortable question:
Are we protecting pregnant women from research risks, or are we quietly transferring those risks into everyday clinical use without the safeguards that come with formal trials?

INFORMED DECISION-MAKING

Real informed consent exists only when people are given honest information about the benefits, risks, and the limits of what is known.

That includes acknowledging where evidence is strong and where it is still developing.

Pregnant women are being asked to make decisions that affect not just themselves, but their unborn children. That deserves the highest safety standards we can possibly meet. They certainly do not deserve assumptions, convenience, or messaging designed to plaster over uncertainty.

And there is another piece of this conversation that rarely gets airtime.

If a product causes harm, responsibility should sit with the companies that manufacture it. That is how consumer protection normally works. It is how we