Here is my opening speech at the digital ID debate from a few weeks ago: https://youtu.be/ejzln2lst0M
YouTube
Bob Moran Digital ID
Bob Moran's opening address at the Digital ID Debate. The full debate will be available from December 16 at www.techthenewera.co.uk - many thanks to Paul Rodriguez for video production support: [email protected]
π13β€2π1
HYPOTHETICAL MUSINGS:
Imagine if you wanted to implement a system of total and permanent global control because you were convinced that the human race could not survive without it (or simply because you are an evil psychopath). You figure out the way to do this is through a prolonged period of widespread fear and confusion. A pandemic. Or rather, something which appears to be a pandemic. Because the problem with a genuine pandemic is that itβs completely unpredictable. How many people will it kill? more crucially, how long will it last for? Even more crucially, how afraid will people actually be? You donβt want genuine fear because you canβt control that. People will panic, become aggressive, the system will collapse. You need fabricated fear. Fear you can turn on and off at various points. And you need to know it will last for at least four or five years. A virus, of any kind, is probably not the answer.
Imagine then, if you developed a TOXIN which behaved a bit like a virus. When poisoned with this chemical agent, most people experienced symptoms similar to a mild, if unusual, cold. But what it was actually doing to the body meant it was very dangerous for certain recipients - elderly and frail / morbidly obese. Now you would be able to control exactly where and when this thing emerged. You could alter how dangerous it was. You could generate multiple waves. You could βreinfectβ people multiple times. You could disperse it in the air at large events, pump it into hospital air conditioning systems, smear it on door handles and train seats.
Now imagine if, as you began to disperse this stuff, you told the world about a pre-existing, or possibly entirely fictional, coronavirus and claimed this was responsible for all this unusual illness. Then you insisted it be tracked using tests which would essentially tell us how many people have any kind of cold at a given time. You totally confuse people on all sides.
Then imagine if you mass-produced the toxin in batches, which varied in lethality of dose, and presented it as a βvaccineβ.
Just an interesting thought.
Imagine if you wanted to implement a system of total and permanent global control because you were convinced that the human race could not survive without it (or simply because you are an evil psychopath). You figure out the way to do this is through a prolonged period of widespread fear and confusion. A pandemic. Or rather, something which appears to be a pandemic. Because the problem with a genuine pandemic is that itβs completely unpredictable. How many people will it kill? more crucially, how long will it last for? Even more crucially, how afraid will people actually be? You donβt want genuine fear because you canβt control that. People will panic, become aggressive, the system will collapse. You need fabricated fear. Fear you can turn on and off at various points. And you need to know it will last for at least four or five years. A virus, of any kind, is probably not the answer.
Imagine then, if you developed a TOXIN which behaved a bit like a virus. When poisoned with this chemical agent, most people experienced symptoms similar to a mild, if unusual, cold. But what it was actually doing to the body meant it was very dangerous for certain recipients - elderly and frail / morbidly obese. Now you would be able to control exactly where and when this thing emerged. You could alter how dangerous it was. You could generate multiple waves. You could βreinfectβ people multiple times. You could disperse it in the air at large events, pump it into hospital air conditioning systems, smear it on door handles and train seats.
Now imagine if, as you began to disperse this stuff, you told the world about a pre-existing, or possibly entirely fictional, coronavirus and claimed this was responsible for all this unusual illness. Then you insisted it be tracked using tests which would essentially tell us how many people have any kind of cold at a given time. You totally confuse people on all sides.
Then imagine if you mass-produced the toxin in batches, which varied in lethality of dose, and presented it as a βvaccineβ.
Just an interesting thought.
π34π1
HELP NEEDED:
I need somebody or some people to help me with some translation for an artwork. It features a passage of text and I would like to be able to produce different versions of it in different languages. I need people who understand our side of the argument and can translate to French, Spanish, Italian and German. Or any one of the above. Iβm happy to pay for the service. If you think you can help, please email [email protected]
Thanks.
I need somebody or some people to help me with some translation for an artwork. It features a passage of text and I would like to be able to produce different versions of it in different languages. I need people who understand our side of the argument and can translate to French, Spanish, Italian and German. Or any one of the above. Iβm happy to pay for the service. If you think you can help, please email [email protected]
Thanks.
π9
Thanks to everybody who responded - youβre a very generous and linguistically talented bunch. Apologies if I donβt reply to every email directly. Iβve managed to sort the translations I need. Other help of this nature might be needed in future as I am trying to make my work more internationally accessible.
π11
I find some people's view of Johnson fascinating now. Personally, I cannot understand the idea that he's somehow a good thing because others would be worse, or ARE worse in other countries. It might be the case that he has resisted falling in line with places like Canada and Australia. But that doesn't for one second excuse the digusting crimes of which he is guilty. Regardless of what leaders are doing elswhere, the policies he has imposed over the past two years are the most harmful, immoral, undemocratic and unlawful actions ever taken by a British Prime Minister. At best, you could say he is a dangerously weak man. At worst, you could say that his continued rule presents an immediate threat to the lives of every single citizen. Our aim should not be to put up with him or be thankful that he isn't Keir Starmer. Our aim should be to remove him from power along with every single politician who supports this nonsense. Put them all on trial for crimes against humanity, and then start again. Stop longing to go back to 2019. That was a world in which all of this hell was possible. We must never return to that society. Daunting as it may be, we have got to tear down the entire system and rebuild something that's real and human. A world where our leaders can't start sacrificing us by the thousand because some corrupt scientist waves a graph in their face. Johnson does not deserve our pity, our gratitude or our forgiveness. He deserves to suffer enormously for the damage he has knowingly inflicted on the men, women and children he was elected to serve.
π34π11π₯4
Couldnβt get onto to GB News because of my damn internet connection. The British countryside is beautiful and thereβs nowhere else Iβd rather live. But if you need to appear on television via zoom, rural internet is not your friend.
π13π5