Top U.S. Trading Partners by Total Goods Trade (2023)
Sorted by total trade value (imports + exports), here are the top countries, with import amounts (U.S. imports from the country), export amounts (U.S. exports to the country), and the difference (exports minus imports, where a negative value indicates a trade deficit):
Canada
Imports to U.S.: $419 billion
Exports from U.S.: $269 billion
Difference: -$150 billion (deficit)
Mexico
Imports to U.S.: $475 billion
Exports from U.S.: $243 billion
Difference: -$232 billion (deficit)
China
Imports to U.S.: $427 billion
Exports from U.S.: $154 billion
Difference: -$273 billion (deficit)
Germany
Imports to U.S.: $159 billion
Exports from U.S.: $94.8 billion
Difference: -$64.2 billion (deficit)
Japan
Imports to U.S.: $147 billion
Exports from U.S.: $80.2 billion
Difference: -$66.8 billion (deficit)
South Korea
Imports to U.S.: $116 billion
Exports from U.S.: $66.7 billion
Difference: -$49.3 billion (deficit)
Vietnam
Imports to U.S.: $114 billion
Exports from U.S.: $11.4 billion
Difference: -$102.6 billion (deficit)
United Kingdom
Imports to U.S.: $68.5 billion
Exports from U.S.: $74 billion
Difference: +$5.5 billion (surplus)
Netherlands
Imports to U.S.: $38 billion
Exports from U.S.: $81 billion
Difference: +$43 billion (surplus)
India
Imports to U.S.: $87 billion
Exports from U.S.: $40.2 billion
Difference: -$46.8 billion (deficit)
Notes:
Total U.S. Goods Trade (2023): Exports were $1.86 trillion, and imports were $3.16 trillion, resulting in a goods trade deficit of approximately $1.3 trillion.
Data Source: Figures are derived from the Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) for 2023, cross-checked with U.S. Census Bureau trade statistics. Slight variations may exist due to rounding or adjustments in official reports.
Sorting: The list is sorted by total trade value (imports + exports), not by individual import or export amounts, as this reflects the most significant trading relationships.
Difference: A negative difference indicates the U.S. imports more than it exports to that country (deficit), while a positive difference indicates a surplus.
This list highlights the U.S.'s largest trading partners, with notable deficits with Mexico, China, and Canada, and surpluses with the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. If you need further details or adjustments (e.g., including services or 2024 estimates), let me know!
Sorted by total trade value (imports + exports), here are the top countries, with import amounts (U.S. imports from the country), export amounts (U.S. exports to the country), and the difference (exports minus imports, where a negative value indicates a trade deficit):
Canada
Imports to U.S.: $419 billion
Exports from U.S.: $269 billion
Difference: -$150 billion (deficit)
Mexico
Imports to U.S.: $475 billion
Exports from U.S.: $243 billion
Difference: -$232 billion (deficit)
China
Imports to U.S.: $427 billion
Exports from U.S.: $154 billion
Difference: -$273 billion (deficit)
Germany
Imports to U.S.: $159 billion
Exports from U.S.: $94.8 billion
Difference: -$64.2 billion (deficit)
Japan
Imports to U.S.: $147 billion
Exports from U.S.: $80.2 billion
Difference: -$66.8 billion (deficit)
South Korea
Imports to U.S.: $116 billion
Exports from U.S.: $66.7 billion
Difference: -$49.3 billion (deficit)
Vietnam
Imports to U.S.: $114 billion
Exports from U.S.: $11.4 billion
Difference: -$102.6 billion (deficit)
United Kingdom
Imports to U.S.: $68.5 billion
Exports from U.S.: $74 billion
Difference: +$5.5 billion (surplus)
Netherlands
Imports to U.S.: $38 billion
Exports from U.S.: $81 billion
Difference: +$43 billion (surplus)
India
Imports to U.S.: $87 billion
Exports from U.S.: $40.2 billion
Difference: -$46.8 billion (deficit)
Notes:
Total U.S. Goods Trade (2023): Exports were $1.86 trillion, and imports were $3.16 trillion, resulting in a goods trade deficit of approximately $1.3 trillion.
Data Source: Figures are derived from the Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) for 2023, cross-checked with U.S. Census Bureau trade statistics. Slight variations may exist due to rounding or adjustments in official reports.
Sorting: The list is sorted by total trade value (imports + exports), not by individual import or export amounts, as this reflects the most significant trading relationships.
Difference: A negative difference indicates the U.S. imports more than it exports to that country (deficit), while a positive difference indicates a surplus.
This list highlights the U.S.'s largest trading partners, with notable deficits with Mexico, China, and Canada, and surpluses with the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. If you need further details or adjustments (e.g., including services or 2024 estimates), let me know!
The "Hands Off" protests on April 5, 2025, spanned over a thousand events across the U.S. and cities like London, Berlin, and Paris, targeting Trump and Musk’s government overhaul efforts, per The Guardian.
Protests in February 2025 also criticized Trump, Musk, and Project 2025, with demonstrations in Philadelphia, Cleveland, and state capitols like Missouri, where signs questioned DOGE’s access to Social Security data, according to AP News.
DOGE, led by Musk, recently cut over 280,000 federal jobs and uncovered 1.3 million illegal immigrants on Medicaid, fueling protester demands to halt DOGE’s fraud investigations, as reported by resistthemainstream.com.
Ukrainian flags at the protests may reflect broader geopolitical tensions, as some demonstrators in Washington, D.C., expressed opposition to Trump’s policies, noted in The Guardian’s coverage.
The reference to Kamala Harris’s campaign stops aligns with her 2024 presidential run’s collapse, marked by discarded flags and posters at Howard University, detailed in Vanity Fair.
Protests in February 2025 also criticized Trump, Musk, and Project 2025, with demonstrations in Philadelphia, Cleveland, and state capitols like Missouri, where signs questioned DOGE’s access to Social Security data, according to AP News.
DOGE, led by Musk, recently cut over 280,000 federal jobs and uncovered 1.3 million illegal immigrants on Medicaid, fueling protester demands to halt DOGE’s fraud investigations, as reported by resistthemainstream.com.
Ukrainian flags at the protests may reflect broader geopolitical tensions, as some demonstrators in Washington, D.C., expressed opposition to Trump’s policies, noted in The Guardian’s coverage.
The reference to Kamala Harris’s campaign stops aligns with her 2024 presidential run’s collapse, marked by discarded flags and posters at Howard University, detailed in Vanity Fair.
Audio
X22 Report
X22-3613-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Creating A Shadow Government, Bongino:Puzzle Pieces Will Come Together In Time – Ep. 3613
April 7, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Creating A Shadow Government, Bongino:Puzzle Pieces Will Come Together In Time – Ep. 3613
April 7, 2025
X22-3613-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Creating A Shadow Government, Bongino:Puzzle Pieces Will Come Together In Time – Ep. 3613
April 7, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Creating A Shadow Government, Bongino:Puzzle Pieces Will Come Together In Time – Ep. 3613
April 7, 2025
Telegram
X22-Report
X22-3613-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Creating A Shadow Government, Bongino:Puzzle Pieces Will Come Together In Time – Ep. 3613
April 7, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Creating A Shadow Government, Bongino:Puzzle Pieces Will Come Together In Time – Ep. 3613
April 7, 2025
Title: "Made in America, Paid in China: The Economic Ties That Bind U.S. Corporations to the Chinese Market"
The below highlights the significant presence and financial dependence of major U.S. corporations on the Chinese market across various industries. Here's a summary:
Food & Beverage:
Starbucks: 7,685 stores in China (27% of global total), generating $3 billion in 2024 (8.3% of global revenue).
McDonald’s: 5,903 restaurants in China (2023), a critical market despite undisclosed revenue.
KFC: 11,648 locations in China (2024), the largest fast-food chain there, with $8.2 billion in revenue (75% of Yum China’s total).
Retail & Technology:
Walmart: 365 outlets in China, with ¥147 billion (~$20 billion USD) in revenue for fiscal year 2025.
Apple: $18.5 billion from China in Q1 2025, down 11.1% year-over-year.
Nike: $7.55 billion from Greater China in 2024 (15.3% of global revenue).
Automotive:
General Motors (GM): Sold 1.8 million vehicles in China in 2024, but market share dropped from 8.6% to 6.8%; global revenue was $187 billion.
Ford: $600 million from China in 2024, its second-largest market.
Tesla: $20.94 billion from China in 2024 (21.4% of global revenue), with 657,102 vehicles sold.
Pharmaceuticals:
Pfizer: China is a major market, though specific revenue isn’t disclosed (global revenue: $58.5 billion in 2023).
Johnson & Johnson: China is strategic, with $56.96 billion in global revenue in 2024.
Cosmetics:
Estée Lauder: $15.61 billion globally in 2024, down 2%, partly due to weaker demand in China.
Procter & Gamble (P&G): 5% revenue drop in Q1 2025, largely due to underperformance in China.
Key Insight:
China is a crucial hub for operations, production, and sales for these U.S. companies. A full decoupling would severely impact their earnings, potentially causing significant financial repercussions on Wall Street, explaining their reluctance to support such measures.
The data underscores the deep economic interdependence between major U.S. corporations and China, revealing that China is not merely a market but a critical operational, production, and sales hub for industries ranging from food and beverage to technology, automotive, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. Companies like Starbucks, KFC, Tesla, Apple, and Nike derive substantial portions of their global revenue from China—often 15-27%—while others, such as GM, Ford, and Walmart, rely on it as a key market despite recent declines. This dependency extends beyond sales, as China serves as a testing and manufacturing base, integral to these companies' global strategies.
The financial stakes are high: for instance, Tesla’s $20.94 billion from China in 2024 and KFC’s $8.2 billion highlight how integral the market is to their bottom lines. A potential decoupling from China would not just disrupt operations in Chinese factories but could trigger a financial crisis on Wall Street, given the significant revenue streams at risk. This economic reality explains the cautious silence of these corporations on issues that might provoke tensions with China—not out of diplomatic courtesy, but to safeguard their quarterly earnings and long-term profitability. In essence, the U.S. corporate sector’s reliance on China creates a powerful incentive to maintain stable relations, as the cost of disruption would be catastrophic for their financial stability and global competitiveness.
The below highlights the significant presence and financial dependence of major U.S. corporations on the Chinese market across various industries. Here's a summary:
Food & Beverage:
Starbucks: 7,685 stores in China (27% of global total), generating $3 billion in 2024 (8.3% of global revenue).
McDonald’s: 5,903 restaurants in China (2023), a critical market despite undisclosed revenue.
KFC: 11,648 locations in China (2024), the largest fast-food chain there, with $8.2 billion in revenue (75% of Yum China’s total).
Retail & Technology:
Walmart: 365 outlets in China, with ¥147 billion (~$20 billion USD) in revenue for fiscal year 2025.
Apple: $18.5 billion from China in Q1 2025, down 11.1% year-over-year.
Nike: $7.55 billion from Greater China in 2024 (15.3% of global revenue).
Automotive:
General Motors (GM): Sold 1.8 million vehicles in China in 2024, but market share dropped from 8.6% to 6.8%; global revenue was $187 billion.
Ford: $600 million from China in 2024, its second-largest market.
Tesla: $20.94 billion from China in 2024 (21.4% of global revenue), with 657,102 vehicles sold.
Pharmaceuticals:
Pfizer: China is a major market, though specific revenue isn’t disclosed (global revenue: $58.5 billion in 2023).
Johnson & Johnson: China is strategic, with $56.96 billion in global revenue in 2024.
Cosmetics:
Estée Lauder: $15.61 billion globally in 2024, down 2%, partly due to weaker demand in China.
Procter & Gamble (P&G): 5% revenue drop in Q1 2025, largely due to underperformance in China.
Key Insight:
China is a crucial hub for operations, production, and sales for these U.S. companies. A full decoupling would severely impact their earnings, potentially causing significant financial repercussions on Wall Street, explaining their reluctance to support such measures.
The data underscores the deep economic interdependence between major U.S. corporations and China, revealing that China is not merely a market but a critical operational, production, and sales hub for industries ranging from food and beverage to technology, automotive, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. Companies like Starbucks, KFC, Tesla, Apple, and Nike derive substantial portions of their global revenue from China—often 15-27%—while others, such as GM, Ford, and Walmart, rely on it as a key market despite recent declines. This dependency extends beyond sales, as China serves as a testing and manufacturing base, integral to these companies' global strategies.
The financial stakes are high: for instance, Tesla’s $20.94 billion from China in 2024 and KFC’s $8.2 billion highlight how integral the market is to their bottom lines. A potential decoupling from China would not just disrupt operations in Chinese factories but could trigger a financial crisis on Wall Street, given the significant revenue streams at risk. This economic reality explains the cautious silence of these corporations on issues that might provoke tensions with China—not out of diplomatic courtesy, but to safeguard their quarterly earnings and long-term profitability. In essence, the U.S. corporate sector’s reliance on China creates a powerful incentive to maintain stable relations, as the cost of disruption would be catastrophic for their financial stability and global competitiveness.
Title: Ownership and Investment in Central Bank Shares: A Global Overview
Summary:
Most central banks, including the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), do not allow public investment, as they are either wholly owned by governments (e.g., Bank of England, ECB) or have restricted ownership structures, such as the Federal Reserve, where shares are held by member banks, or the BIS, which has been exclusively owned by its 63 member central banks since 2010. However, a few central banks offer publicly traded shares, enabling private investors to purchase them on stock exchanges like the SIX Swiss Exchange,
Tokyo Stock Exchange, and Euronext Brussels. These include the Swiss National Bank (SNB), South African Reserve Bank (SARB), Bank of Japan (BOJ), Bank of Greece, and National Bank of Belgium (BNB). Despite this accessibility, these shares come with significant limitations: shareholders have no influence over monetary policy, and dividends are capped, rendering the investments largely symbolic rather than a means of control. Historically, the BIS had private shareholders, such as J.P. Morgan, from 1930 until 2010, when it repurchased all private shares to consolidate ownership among central banks.
The exclusivity of central bank ownership, coupled with the influence of private banks in institutions like the Fed, reinforces concerns about "money printers"—central banks and financial elites—maintaining control, fueling conspiracy narratives about hidden financial power structures.
Summary:
Most central banks, including the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), do not allow public investment, as they are either wholly owned by governments (e.g., Bank of England, ECB) or have restricted ownership structures, such as the Federal Reserve, where shares are held by member banks, or the BIS, which has been exclusively owned by its 63 member central banks since 2010. However, a few central banks offer publicly traded shares, enabling private investors to purchase them on stock exchanges like the SIX Swiss Exchange,
Tokyo Stock Exchange, and Euronext Brussels. These include the Swiss National Bank (SNB), South African Reserve Bank (SARB), Bank of Japan (BOJ), Bank of Greece, and National Bank of Belgium (BNB). Despite this accessibility, these shares come with significant limitations: shareholders have no influence over monetary policy, and dividends are capped, rendering the investments largely symbolic rather than a means of control. Historically, the BIS had private shareholders, such as J.P. Morgan, from 1930 until 2010, when it repurchased all private shares to consolidate ownership among central banks.
The exclusivity of central bank ownership, coupled with the influence of private banks in institutions like the Fed, reinforces concerns about "money printers"—central banks and financial elites—maintaining control, fueling conspiracy narratives about hidden financial power structures.
X22-Report pinned «X22-3613-Report The beginning 👉 03:11 [DS] Creating A Shadow Government, Bongino:Puzzle Pieces Will Come Together In Time – Ep. 3613 April 7, 2025»
Audio
X22 Report
X22-3614-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
D Party Is The Party Of Violence, Rogue Judges Never Had Power, Winning, Next Phase – Ep. 3614
April 8, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
D Party Is The Party Of Violence, Rogue Judges Never Had Power, Winning, Next Phase – Ep. 3614
April 8, 2025
❤2
X22-3614-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
D Party Is The Party Of Violence, Rogue Judges Never Had Power, Winning, Next Phase – Ep. 3614
April 8, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
D Party Is The Party Of Violence, Rogue Judges Never Had Power, Winning, Next Phase – Ep. 3614
April 8, 2025
Telegram
X22-Report
X22-3614-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
D Party Is The Party Of Violence, Rogue Judges Never Had Power, Winning, Next Phase – Ep. 3614
April 8, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
D Party Is The Party Of Violence, Rogue Judges Never Had Power, Winning, Next Phase – Ep. 3614
April 8, 2025
❤1
X22-Report pinned «X22-3614-Report The beginning 👉 03:11 D Party Is The Party Of Violence, Rogue Judges Never Had Power, Winning, Next Phase – Ep. 3614 April 8, 2025»
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
X22Report:
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says all options are on the table - including removing Chinese stocks from U.S. exchanges. China does no have the edge here.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909958429285798255
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says all options are on the table - including removing Chinese stocks from U.S. exchanges. China does no have the edge here.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909958429285798255
X22 Report:
China has responded to Trump’s 104% tariff with an 84% tariff on all U.S. imported goods.
Notice how they didn’t one-up 104% or even match Trump’s tariff.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909955498452857240
China has responded to Trump’s 104% tariff with an 84% tariff on all U.S. imported goods.
Notice how they didn’t one-up 104% or even match Trump’s tariff.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909955498452857240
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
X22 Report:
400% tariffs, and President Xi Jinping is on his way to Washington, D.C. tomorrow.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909952657201971259
400% tariffs, and President Xi Jinping is on his way to Washington, D.C. tomorrow.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909952657201971259
X22 Report:
How many things say 'Made in China' in America?
How many things say 'Made in America' in China?
That is the leverage that will get us a better trade deal.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909946901249851711
How many things say 'Made in China' in America?
How many things say 'Made in America' in China?
That is the leverage that will get us a better trade deal.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909946901249851711
X22 Report:
The [DS] is doing everything they can right now to try to ruin our economy because once Trump fixes it, it's going to be very hard for them to convince everyone that Trump ruined the economy.
Their time is running out.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909931800182337851
The [DS] is doing everything they can right now to try to ruin our economy because once Trump fixes it, it's going to be very hard for them to convince everyone that Trump ruined the economy.
Their time is running out.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909931800182337851
The Department of Justice has disclosed that Ryan Routh, the individual accused of attempting to assassinate Trump, tried to purchase military-grade weapons from Ukraine, including a rocket launcher, with the intent to carry out the killing.
Ukraine knew that this man was going to try to assassinate Trump and said nothing.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909621926110060902
Ukraine knew that this man was going to try to assassinate Trump and said nothing.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/1909621926110060902
Forwarded from Tucker Carlson on X
Tucker Carlson April 09, 2025
Alex Jones: Trump, Israel, Secret WW3 Plans, Dire Wolf Resurrection, Infowars Reporter Assassination
The US government has spent the last 12 years trying to censor and destroy Alex Jones. They’re still trying, and it’s not because he’s crazy and dishonest. It’s because he’s telling the truth. Watch this.
(0:00) How Alex Jones Predicted 9/11
(9:22) The CIA's Influence Over The X Files
(13:33) The Globalists Are Hiding in Plain Sight
(17:55) Why the Left Wants Trump Killed
(20:50) The Burden and Responsibility Alex Jones Bears
(25:37) The Spiritual Revolution
(35:28) Why the Most Evil People Are the Most Unhappy
(38:50) The Secret Undermining of the West
(43:04) The Assassination of Infowars Journalist Jamie White
(47:03) Have We Lost the War With Russia?
(49:47) There Was a 50% Chance of Nuclear War and the Pentagon Didn’t Care
(57:05) The EU’s 20-Year War Strategy
(1:00:00) Why the Globalists Are So Scared of Donald Trump
(1:09:57) The Plan to End Free Speech in the United States
(1:14:10) Alex Jones Details the Legal Attacks Against Him
(1:25:21) Why Obama Secretly Labeled Alex Jones a National Security Threat
(1:29:59) The Fraudulent Auction to Sell Infowars to The Onion
(1:34:42) The Real Culprit Behind the Lawfare Against Alex Jones
(1:39:54) Will the New Department of Justice Help Alex Jones?
(1:52:14) The Potential Nuclear Exchange Between Iran and Israel
(1:55:41) They Want You Dull, Asleep, and Spiritually Dead
(1:58:38) The Evils of the Transhumanist Movement
Includes paid partnerships.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍1