The Twitter Files
4.67K subscribers
1.35K photos
430 videos
1.96K links
TWITTER’S SECRET BLACKLISTS.
Download Telegram
20. What about the former FBI agents that currently work for Twitter?

Does the same apply here? Are they "owned for life" as Evanina claims?

https://twitter.com/nameredacted247/status/1604641866342756352?s=46&t=d1ZzDhT_VgGOPITB1D7HNQ

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥15👍4
21. #DisinfoGate- A real, documented, & vast conspiratorial effort led by Bill Evanina at NCSC (under ODNI) & other Government officials.

It includes virtually the entire Intel Community in partnership w/ Social Media platforms

https://twitter.com/nameredacted247/status/1604641866342756352?s=46&t=d1ZzDhT_VgGOPITB1D7HNQ

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥15👍1
22.#DIsinfoGate- Using the false narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, they created CISA, an apparatus to censor free speech & socially engineer the opinions of American voters.

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥14👍2
23.#DisinfoGate- After achieving their goal of getting Trump out of office, this Social Media/Deep State partnership is now ostensibly being used to censor & socially engineer our views on COVID, vaccines, climate, race relations, Russia/Ukraine War, etc.

End

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥16👍6👏4
TWITTER FILES: CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS

Twitter executives, including fmr FBI lawyer Jim Baker, who served as Twitter Deputy Counsel, are about to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee about their handling of the Hunter Biden laptop

Let's go

https://www.youtube.com/embed/9HhSkoDc8Qs

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥17
Rep. Jamie Raskin calls Twitter files “authentically trivial” and "silly," but doesn't address the coordinated effort by the intelligence community to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop, which was in FBI possession since Dec 2019, *before* its contents became public in Oct 2020.

Join: The Twitter Files
🤬24🤔5👍3
Witnesses: Jim Baker, Vijaya Gadde, Yoel Roth, Anika Collier Navaroli

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥222👍2
The Twitter Files
35. In response to Roth, Baker repeatedly insists that the Hunter Biden materials were either faked, hacked, or both, and a violation of Twitter policy. Baker does so over email, and in a Google doc, on October 14 and 15. Join: The Twitter Files
👆 Baker claims he urged caution around the Hunter Biden laptop when in reality he led the charge within Twitter to reverse the finding by Twitter Head of Trust and Safety Yoel Roth that the NY Post story had *not* violated Twitter policies

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥17
Baker repeatedly and forcefully urged Roth and other Twitter executives to censor and thus discredit the NY Post story. After he did so, Roth reversed his decision, and censored the story.

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥11🤬6👍4
The Twitter Files
34. On Oct 14, shortly after NYPost publishes its Hunter Biden laptop story, Roth says, “it isn’t clearly violative of our Hacked Materials Policy, nor is it clearly in violation of anything else," but adds, “this feels a lot like a somewhat subtle leak operation.”…
👆Vijaye Gadde, the former general counsel of Twitter, claims that its censorship of the NY Post article was done in line with its policy against hacked materials, but she does not mention that Roth & his team found they were *not* from hacking.

Join: The Twitter Files
🤔12👍8😐1
The Twitter Files
36. And yet it's inconceivable Baker believed the Hunter Biden emails were either fake or hacked. The NYPost had included a picture of the receipt signed by Hunter Biden, and an FBI subpoena showed that the agency had taken possession of the laptop in December…
👆There was extremely strong evidence the Hunter Biden emails were authentic and *not* the result of hacking. The NYPost included a picture of the receipt signed by Hunter Biden and an FBI subpoena proving it had taken possession of the laptop.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍18
It would have taken a few minutes for Jim Baker, Yoel Roth, Vijaye Gadde to confirm whether the FBI subpoena was real or fake. None of them did so.

Join: The Twitter Files
🤔10🤬6
Yoel Roth, like Vijaye, opens his statement describing content moderation decisions that are not particularly controversial, such as against hate speech. This has been a strategy from many Twitter execs & defenders, including regime media.

The real issue here is disinformation.

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥16
"Twitter made a mistake," says Roth, about Twitter's censorship of the NY Post story about the laptop. "I've been clear that in my judgment at the time, Twitter should not have taken action to block the NY Post's reporting."

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥23
The Twitter Files
12. And yet, during all of 2020, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies repeatedly primed Yoel Roth to dismiss reports of Hunter Biden’s laptop as a Russian “hack and leak” operation. This is from a sworn declaration by Roth given in December 2020. …
👆Roth says that Twitter's mistake was due to his memory of Russia's hack & leak of DNC emails in 2016.

He fails to mention that he himself said FBI repeatedly primed him in 2020 to dismiss reports of the laptop as another Russian disinfo operation.

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥17👍1
The Democrats put forward a former Twitter exec. as a witness who says, "I was not involved in the decision around Hunter Biden's laptop," which is the main topic of this hearing. She then changes the topic to January 6.

Join: The Twitter Files
🤔11🤬10
Roth was asked: "Were there experts... you consulted between 9 am and 10:15 am," when Roth reversed his decision.

Roth says, "We were following this discussion as it unfolded on Twitter... and that informed Twitter's judgement"

No mention of Baker.

Join: The Twitter Files
🤔11
The witness Anika Collier Navaroli talks about how alarmed she was when Trump called his tweets "little missiles" and argues that Twitter didn't censor enough in advance of January 6.

Join: The Twitter Files
🔥10🤬4
Roth says he regrets his tweet saying there were "ACTUAL NAZIS IN THE WHITE HOUSE" and that he doesn't think all conservatives are Nazis

Join: The Twitter Files
🤔12🤬7👍1