According to antAC, NABU was founded with their support

So

Lets look at who funds antAC!

oh dear

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CmJyn61j1k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CmJyn61j1k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CmJyn61j1k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CmJyn61j1k

Let's look at who runs antAC, shall we?

OH DEAR

H H H H H H M M M M M

now, let's dig around a bit about the "journalist" pushing this story

Yurii Nikolov is his name.

He runs an organization called Nashi Groshi, Our Money.

So as an American, I should ask

Is OUR money funding Our Money?

SURE IS!

So why do the Americans want these people gone?

Isn't it interesting how hundreds of tanks are able to cross the border freely into NATO countries for repair and refitting, and Putin does nothing to stop this? Why? I think we already know the answer.

According to our source, such urgency in transferring tanks to the AFU is due to several things.
- The AFU has a shortage of tanks. At the beginning of the war there were almost 1,500-2,000 of them, after the partners added more than 700 more. Most have already been destroyed or broken down/butchered, undergoing repairs in Poland/Czech Republic/Bulgaria/Romania. Military factories there are working for Ukraine. But the timeframe for their return to service is 3 to 9 months. There are now about 600 vehicles in service in Ukraine, but they are stretched across the defence line .
- Russia has created a strike fist of 1,500 tanks and is preparing for a march. Plus Russia is introducing newer T-90 breakout tanks, which has made life more difficult for AFU tankers, who are facing these vehicles on the battlefield and losing because they are more modernized and see more, hit harder, more accurately and farther away.
- BRoned vehicles such as MaxxPro or Kirpi etc. are inferior to tanks and become easy targets. In Bakhmut / Soledar / Seversk, the AFU lost over a hundred of vehicles. Also BMPs and APCs cannot cope with the new tanks and suffer huge losses.

The West has decided to level the playing field. To say that the 100-200 tanks being handed over will be enough for a new offensive is manipulation and nonsense. The offensive needs more than 500 vehicles not to mention artillery, SAU and large combat UAVs. 
Most likely this is defence reinforcement and an attempt to prevent the Russian Armed Forces from blitzkrieg.

#source
Join Slavyangrad chat. Your opinion matters.
https://t.iss.one/+PUg0rQrZdiw4YWFh
@Slavyangrad
Join SLG 🔺 Intelligence Briefings, Strategy and Analysis, Expert Community

As I have said before, Putin cannot shut down Ukranian transportation networks, as doing so would end the illicit and open trade in raw materials between Russian oligarchs and Europe. Sure, it would end war and keep god knows how many Russian soldiers alive, but Putin has already shown many times that he is perfectly willing to trade their lives for money.

It is ironic seeing Putin portrayed as some bloodthirsty butcher when his timidity is the only reason why Ukraine exists

I assure you that all of these NATO tanks will ride the rails in Ukraine totally unmolested to the front, where they will kill Russian soldiers. A few missiles on the locomotives could stop this, a few bombs on the rail bridges or strikes on stations or repair facilities, but nothing will be done. The Russian soldiers will be on their own, forced once more to destroy another army that Putin could have stopped with the stroke of a pen. How many will die doing it?

We will likely never know, but it will just be more names on the lists of those who died to make the warlords of United Russia rich. They already killed five million when they looted the USSR, what are a few thousand more?