"To me the biggest obstacle is we can sit, you know, at Davos a few years ago the Edelman survey showed us that the the good news is the elite across the world trust each other more and more. So we can come together and design and do beautiful things together.
The bad news is that in every single country they were polling the majority trust their elite less, so we can lead but if people are not following we cannot get where we want to go." Ngaire Woods - The Great Narrative - World Economic Forum, Nov 12, 2021

Ought the common people trust an "elite" to design and shape the future?

"People have become much more self centered and to a certain extent, egoistic. So in such a situation it is much more difficult to create a compromise, because shaping the future, designing the future, usually needs a common will of the people." Klaus Schwab, Narrating the Future, Nov 11, 2021

Who decides this "common will" of the people in order to "shape" and "design" the future?

Doesn't a "common will" imply the negation of the "will of the individual"?
Consider the English language. English (or any spoken language with the exception of Esperanto) is the result of a vast number of "individual wills" voluntarily cooperating by which a natural development occurs. The English language was not "shaped" or "designed" as the result of a "common will" lead by the "narrative" of an intellectual elite.

Designing and shaping the future in accordance with a "common will" is both fallacious and dangerous because it short circuits innovative experimentation and contribution of the "uncommon" individual.

Deleted off Youtube - Preserved on Telegram

Vial of the Pfizer 🎶💔

https://t.iss.one/ausforfreedom

TODAY Joe Biden's Vaccine Mandate lost BIG TIME in Federal Court due to a complete lack of supporting evidence as well as its complete and utter disregard to Constitutional limitations on executive power.

<<<In general, the overwhelming lack of evidence likely shows CMS had insufficient evidence to mandate vaccination on the wide range of facilities that it did. Looking even beyond the evidence deficiencies relating to the specific facilities covered, the lack of data regarding vaccination status and transmissibility—in general—is concerning. Indeed, CMS states that “the effectiveness of the vaccine[s] to prevent disease transmission by those vaccinated [is] not currently known.”17 86 Fed. Reg. at 61,615.18 CMS also admits that the continued efficacy of the vaccine is uncertain. See, e.g., id. at 61,612 (“[M]ajor uncertainties remain as to the future course of the pandemic, including but not limited to vaccine effectiveness in preventing ‘breakthrough’ disease transmission from those vaccinated, [and] the long-term effectiveness of vaccination[.]”). No one questions that protecting patients and healthcare workers from contracting COVID is a laudable objective. But the Court cannot, in good faith, allow CMS to enact an unprecedented mandate that lacks a “rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.”>>> Case: 4:21-cv-01329-MTS Doc. #: 28 Filed: 11/29/21, pages 15-16

"The CMS Medicare mandate goes down hard. This is the best decision since Based Judge Stickman's ruling on Covid rules. Shows, again, the complete lack of evidence behind these mandates. Highlighted, as customary." Robert Barnes

https://cdn.locals.com/documents/47656/47656_hjelhefxy31x1vo.pdf

Considering...

<<<On Tuesday morning, the Chief Medical Officer met with the country's expert panel on vaccines to discuss whether the window between second doses and boosters should be shortened as Australia deals with the Omicron COVID-19 variant.

The United Kingdom is halving the wait time between a second dose and booster from six to three months.>>>
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-30/government-borders-omicron-covid-variant/100660576

To which...

<<<When asked if Australia would follow suit, Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly said people needed to remember the UK was a different environment.

"We need to be cognisant of the international evidence and international decisions, but remember the northern hemisphere is in winter so boosters in winter make a lot of sense," he said.

"We are more than six months away from winter.

"It's likely that that's when we would want the boosters to be actively working."

Professor Kelly said there were benefits of having a booster more than three months after a second dose.

"It's a balance and that's exactly the sort of issues that I discussed this morning with [the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation] and they'll look at that now," he said.>>>
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-30/government-borders-omicron-covid-variant/100660576

Professor Kelly basically admitted that the Covid drugs lack efficacy after 3 months but due to Australia being in Summer then it doesn't really matter.

If that is true then why the continued necessity for the drug mandates or passports? Is it theater?

According to Professor Kelly what would be the difference between an individual lacking efficacy after 3 months and an individual whom is unvaccinated? If there is no real difference (as the 3 month booster program in the UK would imply) then why treat people differently?

• Natural immunity is being ignored.
• Nutrition/exercise/life health as an alternative to drug use is ignored.
• Absurdity of "one size fits all" (ie. children at practically zero risk of serious illness resulting from SARS CoV-2 yet have long life ahead of them to be at risk from unknown adverse drug effects versus elderly people whom do not have as long life ahead at risk of adverse drug effects yet are more at risk to SARS CoV-2 infection}.
• Known waning efficacy of drug injection after 2-3 months congruent with an ongoing push to jab everyone anyway.

Rats being conditioned in a cage? I think so.

Covid has turned into a religion and the jab is its number one sacrament. The priests and the worshippers in the Covidian Cult are mad.

The United States District Court ruling on vaccine mandates yesterday explicitly stated that it was "puzzling" why natural immunity is being completely rejected as valid.

Also noted is that no evidence whatsoever is provided to substantiate the claim made that natural immunity is of a lesser value to that of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Yet at the same time there IS evidence that natural immunity is in fact better than vaccine induced immunity which appears to wane very quickly.

The ruling also asked why mandates were even necessary if boosters were required after six months which seriously undermines the efficacy of the vaccine in the first place.

Here is an extract...

<<<The rejection of natural immunity as an alternative is puzzling. Natural immunity is the immunity of people who have been infected with the COVID-19 virus. In rejecting this alternative, the CMS Mandate stated:

-- While a significant number of healthcare staff have been infected with SARS-Co-V2, evidence indicates their infection-induced immunity, also called “natural immunity” is not equivalent to receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. -- 86 Fed. Reg. at 61559.

The “evidence” CMS relied upon in rejecting that alternative is not provided. The Declaration of Dr. Jay Bhattachary, Director of Stanford University’s Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging disputes CMS’s assertion that natural immunity is not equivalent to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Citing studies from Qatar (which tracked 927,321 individuals for six months after COVID-19 vaccinations), California (which tracked the infection rates from over 5 million patients vaccinated with two Pfizer doses), and U.S. Veterans (which tracked 620,000 vaccinated U.S. Veterans), Plaintiff States assert these studies overwhelmingly conclude that natural immunity provides equivalent or greater protection against severe infection than immunity generated by COVID-19 vaccines.

The CMS Mandate does not yet require boosters to the COVID-19 vaccines. However, the CDC recently recommended boosters. If boosters are needed six months after being “fully vaccinated,” then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?>>> Case 3:21-cv-03970-TAD-KDM

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.185837/gov.uscourts.lawd.185837.28.0.pdf

Webinar - Peter McCullough - Senator Ron Johnson - Brian Tyson - Plus 7 Australian Parliamentarians
🔘Join: RobertNews 🇺🇸

Ukraine War, West's Loss, China's Gain

🇺🇦🥷⛓ — As War rages on, looting in urban centres continues.

On footage, a looter who was caught stealing is seen tied by locals to a lamp post somewhere in Ukraine

Battle For Mariupol

‘He fetched water for his mum and dad, and when he came out… At that moment, a shell landed on the roof and shrapnel caught him right in the head.’ During the battle for Mariupol, Ukrainian nationalists used civilians as human shields. There was no evacuation, so people had to hide in basements with no water, food, or medicine. While retreating, Ukrainian soldiers opened fire on residential buildings to place the blame on Russian troops. This resulted in numerous civilian casualties. The dead were buried in the gardens of the destroyed houses. Russian troops took control of Mariupol in early May 2022. Now Mariupol residents can finally take to the streets without fearing for their lives.

This is a film about people who survived the battle for Mariupol, it features real footage of city battles, destroyed streets and the stories of civilians who lived through it.

#premiere

Follow: https://t.iss.one/rtdocfilms

Biden's speech of March 26, which does not lose its relevance: 200 rubles for 1 dollar