In this recent clip I took from the most recent address by the Victorian Health Minister, Martin Foley, on October 13, he very clearly states that "getting vaccinated" is the ONLY right choice for Victorians.
A perfect example of categorical one size fits all decision making by empowered third party intellectual types whom arrogantly disdain individual decision making.
The ministers disdain for nursers and teachers whom are resisting the mandate is very evident.
Natural immunity, ethical objections pertaining to fetal tissue used in development or testing, individual weighing up of risk/reward pertaining to age and health condition, none of that matters at all.
This is evil and this becomes much more evident when we we witness the consequences of these people exercising power over others. The mask comes off and they are willing to literally have people killed (yes, it's a fact that a small proportion of people do die from this mandated treatment) in order that THEIR plan be fulfilled.
The true elephant in the living room is the COMPLETE absence of ANY mention pertaining to nutrition and healthy life choices that contribute to the development and maintenance of a robust immune system.
In an honest world a HEALTH minister would speak of such things, but he NEVER does. NEVER! All he does is use coercion and rhetoric to push drugs.
The result? A drug addicted and drug oriented population. Great for the drug business, bad for the public.
When I was growing up the mantra was, "just say no." I didn't say no then but I sure do now.
A perfect example of categorical one size fits all decision making by empowered third party intellectual types whom arrogantly disdain individual decision making.
The ministers disdain for nursers and teachers whom are resisting the mandate is very evident.
Natural immunity, ethical objections pertaining to fetal tissue used in development or testing, individual weighing up of risk/reward pertaining to age and health condition, none of that matters at all.
This is evil and this becomes much more evident when we we witness the consequences of these people exercising power over others. The mask comes off and they are willing to literally have people killed (yes, it's a fact that a small proportion of people do die from this mandated treatment) in order that THEIR plan be fulfilled.
The true elephant in the living room is the COMPLETE absence of ANY mention pertaining to nutrition and healthy life choices that contribute to the development and maintenance of a robust immune system.
In an honest world a HEALTH minister would speak of such things, but he NEVER does. NEVER! All he does is use coercion and rhetoric to push drugs.
The result? A drug addicted and drug oriented population. Great for the drug business, bad for the public.
When I was growing up the mantra was, "just say no." I didn't say no then but I sure do now.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Victorian Health Minister Martin Foley - Only one choice is right - October 13, 2021
Forwarded from Tennessee Stands
We have heard the argument over and over again from GOP leadership here in Tennessee, "we don't regulate businesses here in Tennessee." And that argument is used to try and convince the public that private employers have a liberty right to force and/or coerce their employees into making decisions as a condition of employment.
Yet, EVERY member of that same GOP leadership supports the Right to Work Amendment to our Constitution which will come up for a vote in the general election in 2022. So, the legislature is willing to restrict a private business from requiring their employees to be part of a labor union, but unwilling to restrict a business from forcing medical decisions on their employees? It sounds to me that "restricting business" really has nothing to do with it.
100% of Montana Republicans voted on a bill that protects employees and consumers from these medical requirements. And Texas Gov Greg Abbott is now asking the Texas Legislature to do the same.
It is time that we put the politics aside here in Tennessee and get this done in the upcoming Special Session!
https://youtu.be/QqPpGLFV-RU
Yet, EVERY member of that same GOP leadership supports the Right to Work Amendment to our Constitution which will come up for a vote in the general election in 2022. So, the legislature is willing to restrict a private business from requiring their employees to be part of a labor union, but unwilling to restrict a business from forcing medical decisions on their employees? It sounds to me that "restricting business" really has nothing to do with it.
100% of Montana Republicans voted on a bill that protects employees and consumers from these medical requirements. And Texas Gov Greg Abbott is now asking the Texas Legislature to do the same.
It is time that we put the politics aside here in Tennessee and get this done in the upcoming Special Session!
https://youtu.be/QqPpGLFV-RU
YouTube
We need legislators to END employer mandates in this Special Session.
We have heard the argument over and over again from GOP leadership here in Tennessee, "we don't regulate businesses here in Tennessee." And that argument is ...
Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews hints at permanent disbarment of the unvaccinated from the Victorian economy. In the below clip he speaks of booster shots for people to remain "vaccinated" and thus eligible to participate in the economy.
Naturally immune? You are a filthy leper.
Strong and robust immune system? You are a filthy leper also.
Object to aborted fetal tissue use? Filthy leper.
What happened Australia? Too few stood up is what happened!
Compliance with evil only empowers evil. This is evil.
Acceptance and compliance with evil sets a precedent which serves as the foundation for increasing evil. That's the truth.
It's not Dan Andrews fault, he's just a symptom. The fault lies with the millions of people whom give life to the edicts of Dan Andrews. It's not Dan Andrews informing on their neighbours, or Dan Andrews arresting maskless people, or Dan Andrews not allowing the unvaxxed into their businesses. It's the people!
It's the common people that make the image of the beast which they then worship. The image is a fiction but is given life by manifest action and thus manifests physically. It's right in front of people yet they cannot perceive it. Eyes that cannot see and ears that cannot hear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlM4MgST6ok
Naturally immune? You are a filthy leper.
Strong and robust immune system? You are a filthy leper also.
Object to aborted fetal tissue use? Filthy leper.
What happened Australia? Too few stood up is what happened!
Compliance with evil only empowers evil. This is evil.
Acceptance and compliance with evil sets a precedent which serves as the foundation for increasing evil. That's the truth.
It's not Dan Andrews fault, he's just a symptom. The fault lies with the millions of people whom give life to the edicts of Dan Andrews. It's not Dan Andrews informing on their neighbours, or Dan Andrews arresting maskless people, or Dan Andrews not allowing the unvaxxed into their businesses. It's the people!
It's the common people that make the image of the beast which they then worship. The image is a fiction but is given life by manifest action and thus manifests physically. It's right in front of people yet they cannot perceive it. Eyes that cannot see and ears that cannot hear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlM4MgST6ok
Remember this...
<<<I made some comments that within the COVID vaccine, I believe that COVID is -- the dynamics in the COVID more and more indicate a potential that we will have a clearly repeated business. The reasons for that are multiple. Let me start by saying, in the beginning, we were waiting to see if the immunity will be durable. Now we still don't have data about the immunity of our vaccine because it is early. But we do see that the people that have the disease, more and more publications indicate that after several months, the immune response goes down. So there is a need to boost.>>> Albert Bourla, Pfizer Inc, Chairman of the Board & CEO February 2, 2021
https://s21.q4cdn.com/317678438/files/doc_financials/2020/q4/PFE-USQ_Transcript_2021-02-02.pdf
Well Albert Bourla brings us an update...
<<<"These results provide further evidence of the benefits of boosters as we aim to keep people well-protected against this disease," Albert Bourla, Pfizer's chairman and chief executive officer, said in a news release Thursday.
"In addition to our efforts to increase global access and uptake among the unvaccinated, we believe boosters have a critical role to play in addressing the ongoing public health threat of this pandemic," Bourla said. "We look forward to sharing these data with health authorities and working together to determine how they can be used to support the rollout of booster doses around the world.">>> https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/21/health/pfizer-booster-dose-efficacy-wellness-bn/index.html
The program is "vax everyone" with the help of the governments around the world working as defacto sales/marketing teams for Big Pharma.
A sales/marketing team for a particular product clearly lacks incentive to mention alternatives which explains why there is still ZERO mention of nutrition and exercise life choices pertaining to building and maintaining a robust immune systems.
According to Big Pharma and their defacto government sales/marketing teams, Big Pharma "drugs" are the only answer. Lobbying dollars sure do pay off.
Are you buying it? Are you a cash cow for Big Pharma? How many boosters will it take before it clicks?
<<<I made some comments that within the COVID vaccine, I believe that COVID is -- the dynamics in the COVID more and more indicate a potential that we will have a clearly repeated business. The reasons for that are multiple. Let me start by saying, in the beginning, we were waiting to see if the immunity will be durable. Now we still don't have data about the immunity of our vaccine because it is early. But we do see that the people that have the disease, more and more publications indicate that after several months, the immune response goes down. So there is a need to boost.>>> Albert Bourla, Pfizer Inc, Chairman of the Board & CEO February 2, 2021
https://s21.q4cdn.com/317678438/files/doc_financials/2020/q4/PFE-USQ_Transcript_2021-02-02.pdf
Well Albert Bourla brings us an update...
<<<"These results provide further evidence of the benefits of boosters as we aim to keep people well-protected against this disease," Albert Bourla, Pfizer's chairman and chief executive officer, said in a news release Thursday.
"In addition to our efforts to increase global access and uptake among the unvaccinated, we believe boosters have a critical role to play in addressing the ongoing public health threat of this pandemic," Bourla said. "We look forward to sharing these data with health authorities and working together to determine how they can be used to support the rollout of booster doses around the world.">>> https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/21/health/pfizer-booster-dose-efficacy-wellness-bn/index.html
The program is "vax everyone" with the help of the governments around the world working as defacto sales/marketing teams for Big Pharma.
A sales/marketing team for a particular product clearly lacks incentive to mention alternatives which explains why there is still ZERO mention of nutrition and exercise life choices pertaining to building and maintaining a robust immune systems.
According to Big Pharma and their defacto government sales/marketing teams, Big Pharma "drugs" are the only answer. Lobbying dollars sure do pay off.
Are you buying it? Are you a cash cow for Big Pharma? How many boosters will it take before it clicks?
Forwarded from Dr. Peter McCullough [FAKE]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Scott Youngblood's presentation before the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors Meeting on November 2, 2021.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"To me the biggest obstacle is we can sit, you know, at Davos a few years ago the Edelman survey showed us that the the good news is the elite across the world trust each other more and more. So we can come together and design and do beautiful things together.
The bad news is that in every single country they were polling the majority trust their elite less, so we can lead but if people are not following we cannot get where we want to go." Ngaire Woods - The Great Narrative - World Economic Forum, Nov 12, 2021
Ought the common people trust an "elite" to design and shape the future?
The bad news is that in every single country they were polling the majority trust their elite less, so we can lead but if people are not following we cannot get where we want to go." Ngaire Woods - The Great Narrative - World Economic Forum, Nov 12, 2021
Ought the common people trust an "elite" to design and shape the future?
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"People have become much more self centered and to a certain extent, egoistic. So in such a situation it is much more difficult to create a compromise, because shaping the future, designing the future, usually needs a common will of the people." Klaus Schwab, Narrating the Future, Nov 11, 2021
Who decides this "common will" of the people in order to "shape" and "design" the future?
Doesn't a "common will" imply the negation of the "will of the individual"?
Consider the English language. English (or any spoken language with the exception of Esperanto) is the result of a vast number of "individual wills" voluntarily cooperating by which a natural development occurs. The English language was not "shaped" or "designed" as the result of a "common will" lead by the "narrative" of an intellectual elite.
Designing and shaping the future in accordance with a "common will" is both fallacious and dangerous because it short circuits innovative experimentation and contribution of the "uncommon" individual.
Who decides this "common will" of the people in order to "shape" and "design" the future?
Doesn't a "common will" imply the negation of the "will of the individual"?
Consider the English language. English (or any spoken language with the exception of Esperanto) is the result of a vast number of "individual wills" voluntarily cooperating by which a natural development occurs. The English language was not "shaped" or "designed" as the result of a "common will" lead by the "narrative" of an intellectual elite.
Designing and shaping the future in accordance with a "common will" is both fallacious and dangerous because it short circuits innovative experimentation and contribution of the "uncommon" individual.
Forwarded from 😀🇦🇺 [Updates] Australia Freedom Rally
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💥 THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED 💥
🌏 WORLD WIDE RALLY FOR FREEDOM 5.0 INTERNATIONAL COMPILATION VIDEO 🌏
Video by: @CovidRedPills
💻 Website: AustraliaFreedomRally.com
📧 Subscribe: AustraliaFreedomRally.substack.com
📣 Subscribe: t.iss.one/AustraliaFreedomRallyUpdates
👥 Join: t.iss.one/AustraliaFreedomRally
🌏 WORLD WIDE RALLY FOR FREEDOM 5.0 INTERNATIONAL COMPILATION VIDEO 🌏
Video by: @CovidRedPills
💻 Website: AustraliaFreedomRally.com
📧 Subscribe: AustraliaFreedomRally.substack.com
📣 Subscribe: t.iss.one/AustraliaFreedomRallyUpdates
👥 Join: t.iss.one/AustraliaFreedomRally
Forwarded from Australiaforfreedom (Jay Hernandez)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TODAY Joe Biden's Vaccine Mandate lost BIG TIME in Federal Court due to a complete lack of supporting evidence as well as its complete and utter disregard to Constitutional limitations on executive power.
<<<In general, the overwhelming lack of evidence likely shows CMS had insufficient evidence to mandate vaccination on the wide range of facilities that it did. Looking even beyond the evidence deficiencies relating to the specific facilities covered, the lack of data regarding vaccination status and transmissibility—in general—is concerning. Indeed, CMS states that “the effectiveness of the vaccine[s] to prevent disease transmission by those vaccinated [is] not currently known.”17 86 Fed. Reg. at 61,615.18 CMS also admits that the continued efficacy of the vaccine is uncertain. See, e.g., id. at 61,612 (“[M]ajor uncertainties remain as to the future course of the pandemic, including but not limited to vaccine effectiveness in preventing ‘breakthrough’ disease transmission from those vaccinated, [and] the long-term effectiveness of vaccination[.]”). No one questions that protecting patients and healthcare workers from contracting COVID is a laudable objective. But the Court cannot, in good faith, allow CMS to enact an unprecedented mandate that lacks a “rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.”>>> Case: 4:21-cv-01329-MTS Doc. #: 28 Filed: 11/29/21, pages 15-16
"The CMS Medicare mandate goes down hard. This is the best decision since Based Judge Stickman's ruling on Covid rules. Shows, again, the complete lack of evidence behind these mandates. Highlighted, as customary." Robert Barnes
https://cdn.locals.com/documents/47656/47656_hjelhefxy31x1vo.pdf
<<<In general, the overwhelming lack of evidence likely shows CMS had insufficient evidence to mandate vaccination on the wide range of facilities that it did. Looking even beyond the evidence deficiencies relating to the specific facilities covered, the lack of data regarding vaccination status and transmissibility—in general—is concerning. Indeed, CMS states that “the effectiveness of the vaccine[s] to prevent disease transmission by those vaccinated [is] not currently known.”17 86 Fed. Reg. at 61,615.18 CMS also admits that the continued efficacy of the vaccine is uncertain. See, e.g., id. at 61,612 (“[M]ajor uncertainties remain as to the future course of the pandemic, including but not limited to vaccine effectiveness in preventing ‘breakthrough’ disease transmission from those vaccinated, [and] the long-term effectiveness of vaccination[.]”). No one questions that protecting patients and healthcare workers from contracting COVID is a laudable objective. But the Court cannot, in good faith, allow CMS to enact an unprecedented mandate that lacks a “rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.”>>> Case: 4:21-cv-01329-MTS Doc. #: 28 Filed: 11/29/21, pages 15-16
"The CMS Medicare mandate goes down hard. This is the best decision since Based Judge Stickman's ruling on Covid rules. Shows, again, the complete lack of evidence behind these mandates. Highlighted, as customary." Robert Barnes
https://cdn.locals.com/documents/47656/47656_hjelhefxy31x1vo.pdf
Considering...
<<<On Tuesday morning, the Chief Medical Officer met with the country's expert panel on vaccines to discuss whether the window between second doses and boosters should be shortened as Australia deals with the Omicron COVID-19 variant.
The United Kingdom is halving the wait time between a second dose and booster from six to three months.>>>
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-30/government-borders-omicron-covid-variant/100660576
To which...
<<<When asked if Australia would follow suit, Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly said people needed to remember the UK was a different environment.
"We need to be cognisant of the international evidence and international decisions, but remember the northern hemisphere is in winter so boosters in winter make a lot of sense," he said.
"We are more than six months away from winter.
"It's likely that that's when we would want the boosters to be actively working."
Professor Kelly said there were benefits of having a booster more than three months after a second dose.
"It's a balance and that's exactly the sort of issues that I discussed this morning with [the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation] and they'll look at that now," he said.>>>
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-30/government-borders-omicron-covid-variant/100660576
Professor Kelly basically admitted that the Covid drugs lack efficacy after 3 months but due to Australia being in Summer then it doesn't really matter.
If that is true then why the continued necessity for the drug mandates or passports? Is it theater?
According to Professor Kelly what would be the difference between an individual lacking efficacy after 3 months and an individual whom is unvaccinated? If there is no real difference (as the 3 month booster program in the UK would imply) then why treat people differently?
• Natural immunity is being ignored.
• Nutrition/exercise/life health as an alternative to drug use is ignored.
• Absurdity of "one size fits all" (ie. children at practically zero risk of serious illness resulting from SARS CoV-2 yet have long life ahead of them to be at risk from unknown adverse drug effects versus elderly people whom do not have as long life ahead at risk of adverse drug effects yet are more at risk to SARS CoV-2 infection}.
• Known waning efficacy of drug injection after 2-3 months congruent with an ongoing push to jab everyone anyway.
Rats being conditioned in a cage? I think so.
Covid has turned into a religion and the jab is its number one sacrament. The priests and the worshippers in the Covidian Cult are mad.
<<<On Tuesday morning, the Chief Medical Officer met with the country's expert panel on vaccines to discuss whether the window between second doses and boosters should be shortened as Australia deals with the Omicron COVID-19 variant.
The United Kingdom is halving the wait time between a second dose and booster from six to three months.>>>
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-30/government-borders-omicron-covid-variant/100660576
To which...
<<<When asked if Australia would follow suit, Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly said people needed to remember the UK was a different environment.
"We need to be cognisant of the international evidence and international decisions, but remember the northern hemisphere is in winter so boosters in winter make a lot of sense," he said.
"We are more than six months away from winter.
"It's likely that that's when we would want the boosters to be actively working."
Professor Kelly said there were benefits of having a booster more than three months after a second dose.
"It's a balance and that's exactly the sort of issues that I discussed this morning with [the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation] and they'll look at that now," he said.>>>
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-30/government-borders-omicron-covid-variant/100660576
Professor Kelly basically admitted that the Covid drugs lack efficacy after 3 months but due to Australia being in Summer then it doesn't really matter.
If that is true then why the continued necessity for the drug mandates or passports? Is it theater?
According to Professor Kelly what would be the difference between an individual lacking efficacy after 3 months and an individual whom is unvaccinated? If there is no real difference (as the 3 month booster program in the UK would imply) then why treat people differently?
• Natural immunity is being ignored.
• Nutrition/exercise/life health as an alternative to drug use is ignored.
• Absurdity of "one size fits all" (ie. children at practically zero risk of serious illness resulting from SARS CoV-2 yet have long life ahead of them to be at risk from unknown adverse drug effects versus elderly people whom do not have as long life ahead at risk of adverse drug effects yet are more at risk to SARS CoV-2 infection}.
• Known waning efficacy of drug injection after 2-3 months congruent with an ongoing push to jab everyone anyway.
Rats being conditioned in a cage? I think so.
Covid has turned into a religion and the jab is its number one sacrament. The priests and the worshippers in the Covidian Cult are mad.
www.abc.net.au
'We're not going back to lockdowns': Morrison says Australia will press forward as Omicron forces border changes
The Prime Minister says "none of us" want a return to lockdowns after the Omicron COVID-19 variant arrives in Australia, and that temporary border closures are a measure to prevent the return of harsher restrictions.
The United States District Court ruling on vaccine mandates yesterday explicitly stated that it was "puzzling" why natural immunity is being completely rejected as valid.
Also noted is that no evidence whatsoever is provided to substantiate the claim made that natural immunity is of a lesser value to that of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Yet at the same time there IS evidence that natural immunity is in fact better than vaccine induced immunity which appears to wane very quickly.
The ruling also asked why mandates were even necessary if boosters were required after six months which seriously undermines the efficacy of the vaccine in the first place.
Here is an extract...
<<<The rejection of natural immunity as an alternative is puzzling. Natural immunity is the immunity of people who have been infected with the COVID-19 virus. In rejecting this alternative, the CMS Mandate stated:
-- While a significant number of healthcare staff have been infected with SARS-Co-V2, evidence indicates their infection-induced immunity, also called “natural immunity” is not equivalent to receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. -- 86 Fed. Reg. at 61559.
The “evidence” CMS relied upon in rejecting that alternative is not provided. The Declaration of Dr. Jay Bhattachary, Director of Stanford University’s Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging disputes CMS’s assertion that natural immunity is not equivalent to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Citing studies from Qatar (which tracked 927,321 individuals for six months after COVID-19 vaccinations), California (which tracked the infection rates from over 5 million patients vaccinated with two Pfizer doses), and U.S. Veterans (which tracked 620,000 vaccinated U.S. Veterans), Plaintiff States assert these studies overwhelmingly conclude that natural immunity provides equivalent or greater protection against severe infection than immunity generated by COVID-19 vaccines.
The CMS Mandate does not yet require boosters to the COVID-19 vaccines. However, the CDC recently recommended boosters. If boosters are needed six months after being “fully vaccinated,” then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?>>> Case 3:21-cv-03970-TAD-KDM
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.185837/gov.uscourts.lawd.185837.28.0.pdf
Also noted is that no evidence whatsoever is provided to substantiate the claim made that natural immunity is of a lesser value to that of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Yet at the same time there IS evidence that natural immunity is in fact better than vaccine induced immunity which appears to wane very quickly.
The ruling also asked why mandates were even necessary if boosters were required after six months which seriously undermines the efficacy of the vaccine in the first place.
Here is an extract...
<<<The rejection of natural immunity as an alternative is puzzling. Natural immunity is the immunity of people who have been infected with the COVID-19 virus. In rejecting this alternative, the CMS Mandate stated:
-- While a significant number of healthcare staff have been infected with SARS-Co-V2, evidence indicates their infection-induced immunity, also called “natural immunity” is not equivalent to receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. -- 86 Fed. Reg. at 61559.
The “evidence” CMS relied upon in rejecting that alternative is not provided. The Declaration of Dr. Jay Bhattachary, Director of Stanford University’s Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging disputes CMS’s assertion that natural immunity is not equivalent to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Citing studies from Qatar (which tracked 927,321 individuals for six months after COVID-19 vaccinations), California (which tracked the infection rates from over 5 million patients vaccinated with two Pfizer doses), and U.S. Veterans (which tracked 620,000 vaccinated U.S. Veterans), Plaintiff States assert these studies overwhelmingly conclude that natural immunity provides equivalent or greater protection against severe infection than immunity generated by COVID-19 vaccines.
The CMS Mandate does not yet require boosters to the COVID-19 vaccines. However, the CDC recently recommended boosters. If boosters are needed six months after being “fully vaccinated,” then how good are the COVID-19 vaccines, and why is it necessary to mandate them?>>> Case 3:21-cv-03970-TAD-KDM
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.185837/gov.uscourts.lawd.185837.28.0.pdf
Forwarded from MAGA News Feed
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Webinar - Peter McCullough - Senator Ron Johnson - Brian Tyson - Plus 7 Australian Parliamentarians
🔘Join: RobertNews 🇺🇸
🔘Join: RobertNews 🇺🇸
Forwarded from Dr. Peter McCullough [FAKE]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Dr. Peter McCullough [FAKE]
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM