صحفي إيران يقول إرسال 3 طائرات إلى عُمان قد يكون لإنقاذ الطائرات من الاستهداف، وليس وفد تفاوض، لأن الوفد لا يحتاج إلى 3 طائرات.
@ThePalestinianObserver
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤21🤣5👍3
The Palestinian Observer — TPO
Also why are so many Isrealis DM’ing me ? Lollll
They’ve gotta be like the most people to DM me
They’ve gotta be like the most people to DM me
🤯6😱2
China informs Oman being the mediator between US, Israel & Iran that "it cannot stand by idly and watch the conflict escalate"
صحيفة AFP: الصين أبلغت عُمان بأنها الوسيط بين الولايات المتحدة، إسرائيل، وإيران أنها "لا يمكنها الوقوف مكتوفة الأيدي ومشاهدة تصاعد الصراع".
@ThePalestinianObserver
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤19👍4
The Palestinian Observer — TPO
Israel's attack on Iran violates international law and norms governing international relations.
وزير الخارجية الصيني: هجوم إسرائيل على إيران ينتهك القانون الدولي والمعايير التي تحكم العلاقات الدولية.
@ThePalestinianObserver
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤19💯3
We, along with the Qassam Brigades, managed to snipe an Israeli soldier in the Abasan al-Kabira area, east of Khan Yunis.
سرايا القدس:
تمكنا مع كتائب القسام من قنص جندي صهيوني في منطقة عبسان الكبيرة شرق مدينة خانيونس.
@ThePalestinianObserver
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤29👍2
A (Israeli) subscriber sent me this graph.
It shows a detailed breakdown of the recent Iran-led missile campaign (13–18 June), with roughly 420–450 projectiles fired at Israel across 20 waves. But the key story isn’t the total—it’s the timing.
Over 84% of the missiles came in the first nine waves (13–16 June), most in the pre-dawn hours, averaging ~40 missiles per volley. After the 16 June 04:10 salvo, the launch rate collapsed. Only one medium burst (≈20 missiles) happened later, on 17 June at 08:41. Everything else was small, sporadic, and largely symbolic.
Why the sudden drop-off? Four plausible reasons:
1. Stockpile depletion – early saturation likely burned through Iran’s ready-to-launch inventory.
2. Effective Israeli strikes – counter-battery fire may have destroyed or disrupted key launchers.
3. Mission accomplished – Tehran showed reach, rallied its base, and rattled markets. More missiles meant more risk for less payoff.
4. Command friction – coordination across Iran, proxies, and C2 elements is hard; follow-up salvos likely stalled without approvals or logistics.
Also worth noting:
• OSINT count (450) vs IDF claim (400)—a typical 10% gap, due to radar-confirmed vs visual/telemetry-based tallies.
• Attack timings aimed to exploit Israeli crew fatigue and clutter interceptor sensors (01:00–05:00 local).
• The missile mix (ballistic, cruise, drones) isn’t clear from the graph but matters for understanding defensive strain.
Bottom line: This was a front-loaded blitz, designed to shock and awe. Once Israel’s layered systems held, the rest was optics. The offensive peaked early and fizzled fast.
— The Palestinian Observer
@ThePalestinianObserver
It shows a detailed breakdown of the recent Iran-led missile campaign (13–18 June), with roughly 420–450 projectiles fired at Israel across 20 waves. But the key story isn’t the total—it’s the timing.
Over 84% of the missiles came in the first nine waves (13–16 June), most in the pre-dawn hours, averaging ~40 missiles per volley. After the 16 June 04:10 salvo, the launch rate collapsed. Only one medium burst (≈20 missiles) happened later, on 17 June at 08:41. Everything else was small, sporadic, and largely symbolic.
Why the sudden drop-off? Four plausible reasons:
1. Stockpile depletion – early saturation likely burned through Iran’s ready-to-launch inventory.
2. Effective Israeli strikes – counter-battery fire may have destroyed or disrupted key launchers.
3. Mission accomplished – Tehran showed reach, rallied its base, and rattled markets. More missiles meant more risk for less payoff.
4. Command friction – coordination across Iran, proxies, and C2 elements is hard; follow-up salvos likely stalled without approvals or logistics.
Also worth noting:
• OSINT count (450) vs IDF claim (400)—a typical 10% gap, due to radar-confirmed vs visual/telemetry-based tallies.
• Attack timings aimed to exploit Israeli crew fatigue and clutter interceptor sensors (01:00–05:00 local).
• The missile mix (ballistic, cruise, drones) isn’t clear from the graph but matters for understanding defensive strain.
Bottom line: This was a front-loaded blitz, designed to shock and awe. Once Israel’s layered systems held, the rest was optics. The offensive peaked early and fizzled fast.
— The Palestinian Observer
@ThePalestinianObserver
🤔11👍2
وزير الخارجية الإيراني أراغتشي للجزيرة ينفي إرسال وفد إلى عُمان.
@ThePalestinianObserver
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏14
The Palestinian Observer — TPO
A (Israeli) subscriber sent me this graph. It shows a detailed breakdown of the recent Iran-led missile campaign (13–18 June), with roughly 420–450 projectiles fired at Israel across 20 waves. But the key story isn’t the total—it’s the timing. Over 84% of…
Missile Barrage Timeline (13–18 June)
Wave | Time (UTC) | Missiles | Cumulative Total
-----|----------------------|----------|------------------
1 | 13 Jun 21:02 | ≈42 | 42
2 | 13 Jun 23:13 | ≈41 | 83
3 | 14 Jun 01:07 | ≈38 | 121
4 | 14 Jun 04:38 | ≈19 | 140
5 | 14 Jun 05:14 | ≈22 | 162
6 | 14 Jun 23:10 | ≈42 | 204
7 | 15 Jun 02:52 | ≈48 | 252
8 | 15 Jun 16:08 | ≈50 | 302
9 | 16 Jun 04:10 | ≈55 | 357
10–20| 16 Jun 19:38 → 18 Jun 01:25 | ≈66 (combined) | ≈423
Wave | Time (UTC) | Missiles | Cumulative Total
-----|----------------------|----------|------------------
1 | 13 Jun 21:02 | ≈42 | 42
2 | 13 Jun 23:13 | ≈41 | 83
3 | 14 Jun 01:07 | ≈38 | 121
4 | 14 Jun 04:38 | ≈19 | 140
5 | 14 Jun 05:14 | ≈22 | 162
6 | 14 Jun 23:10 | ≈42 | 204
7 | 15 Jun 02:52 | ≈48 | 252
8 | 15 Jun 16:08 | ≈50 | 302
9 | 16 Jun 04:10 | ≈55 | 357
10–20| 16 Jun 19:38 → 18 Jun 01:25 | ≈66 (combined) | ≈423
👍4🤓4
The Palestinian Observer — TPO
Missile Barrage Timeline (13–18 June) Wave | Time (UTC) | Missiles | Cumulative Total -----|----------------------|----------|------------------ 1 | 13 Jun 21:02 | ≈42 | 42 2 | 13 Jun 23:13 | ≈41 | 83 3 | 14 Jun…
The last 10 waves combined are almost the size of one wave at the beginning
👍10
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This could be as the Iranian reporter said just to protect the plans or the foreign minister could’ve been trying to save face while secretly negotiating
على الرغم من رفض إيران إرسال فريق إلى عُمان، تكشف التسجيلات من LiveATC عن إحدى الطائرات JJ25 تنبه عُمان بوصول ٤ طائرات قادمة من إيران.
يمكن أن يكون هذا كما قال الصحفي الإيراني فقط لحماية الخطط، أو أن وزير الخارجية كان يحاول إنقاذ وجهه في حين كان يتفاوض سراً.
@ThePalestinianObserver
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣6👍2
We estimate that Iran and its proxies will attack our forces if the United States launches a strike against Iran.
مسؤول أمريكي للجزيرة:
تقديرنا أن إيران ووكلاءها سيهاجمون قواتنا في حال توجيه الولايات المتحدة ضربة لإيران
@ThePalestinianObserver
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣14🤪5❤1🤔1
US forces in the Middle East have taken maximum security measures.
مسؤول أمريكي للجزيرة:
القوات الأمريكية في منطقة الشرق الأوسط اتخذت إجراءات الحماية القصوى
@ThePalestinianObserver
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣16🤔2
The Palestinian Observer — TPO
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Wow really?
🤪5🤣2👍1