I took a little clip from the video above where they show the sound frequency actually making the particles rotate. Makes me think of solar systems & galaxies

This makes me think of blood cells moving through our veins, or bacteria moving about. So much is connected to frequency. On the macro/universal scale to the micro/subatomic scale. Makes me think of music industry, and how they use sound against us. Not only music, but language itself, words. I think this is a very deep rabbit hole.

I know some are against hermeticism, and I personally do not subscribe to hermeticism, or any modern available system for that matter. However, as in all things, you can always find a degree of truth. One of hermetic principals is the principal of vibration.

I still need to do more research on this, but, a Russian historian name Alexander Pirojkov, who recently died, spent many years researching the available historical records to learn about pagan Slavic people, kept bringing up the fact that pagan Slavic people understood vibration. He made a few videos talking about various pre-Christian Slavic traditions, and how it was connected to the knowledge of vibration.

Molecular structure of water is affected by our consciousness,our intent, and our sound

Water exposed to the sound of the music of Kawachi folk dance

I’m glad to see people finally coming around to what I’ve been saying years ago. When I posted information on fraudulent official history of Roman Empire, people didn’t take me seriously. They looked at it as outlandish conspiracy theories. Now finally others are doing their independent research, and moving their brain, and starting to gradually expose this lie

It’s honestly a huge relief that others are starting to cover this stuff. I can move on to other things. It’s a hefty subject because it interlinks with a certain group who has a maniacal plan to control the world. The church is their brainchild. So is Islam.

https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-church-history/

“Roman Empire” is an important topic for everyone to look into, and re-examine with new eyes. So much is based on Greco Roman empire history. This lie needs to be unraveled, and the real truth about Rome needs to come out,

The Roman empire dominates the history school books. We've all been taught that it was the Greco-Roman culture that has laid out the bedrock of our civilization. Somehow people have not investigated the fact that there aren't any artifacts proving the existence of the ANCIENT Greco-Roman Empire.

Everything about a sophisticated and refined society the mainstream historians & archaeologists credited to the Greco-Roman culture.

There are no original Roman books available for public view. The cartographers who were supposedly living during the time when this supposable Greco-Roman empire was flourishing didn't mention anything about the grand Roman Empire.

The maps that they present as the early world maps, and display in our school books showing the Roman empire, are not the authentic ancient maps. They are copies, made in 17 and 18 century, and somehow mysteriously the original maps have disappeared. Just like all of the original books go missing, original tape of the moon-landing is missing, and original Constitution has magically disappeared.

The city of Rome in Italy was only estimated to have about 10,000 people living in that settlement, but yet, we've all been bought up to believe the fairytale story of Great Roman empire going around conquering the civilized world. We were all taught that after Rome has conquered those lands, they had to maintain, and defend those lands, and at the same time, the Roman soldiers of all people were able to somehow create fantastic archaeological masterpieces around the world.

So many magnificent buildings, roads, water-aqueducts, bridges, metropolises, and other brilliant engineering masterpieces & inventions were stamped with a Roman stamp by mainstream historians.

What we know as a classical Greco-Roman building style is actually found in much greater numbers, and much more impressive outside of Greece/Rome.

If you examine Italy Rome itself, you will not find the type of impressive so-called Roman style buildings that we see all over the world which are attributed to Romans. Those buildings are usually found located far from Rome. The historical buildings in Rome itself are actually not that impressive, made from cheaper materials, also smaller in size.

Examining the actual city of Rome in Italy, you can clearly see that it wasn't some amazing, marvelous place. The ancient architecture of city Rome in Italy looks small, simple in comparison to the so-called Roman architecture build in far away provinces. How could that be? If Rome was indeed responsible for such breathtaking structures, and architecture around the world, then shouldn't it also be found all over ancient Rome Italy?

According to certain scholars, when people in the past would say the name "Rome", this didn't necessarily mean the city of Rome in modern-day Italy. There were three Romes. The name Rome was primarily a title. First Rome was in Istanbul, second was in Italy, and the third one was in Moscow, and I believe this third Moscow Rome was created by the Romanovs. The Russian word for "Tsar" meant Caesar in Russian. The Romanovs were the enemy of ethnic Slavic Russians. They have enslaved them

Academics claim themselves that Greeks rose from the ashes of even older culture such as Mycenae for example, which according to mainstream historians saw its final collapse 1000 years before the Romans even appeared on the historic scene. Mycenae Civilization didn’t only have a full water supply, and sewage systems, but they even had hot running water on the second floor of their apartment buildings.

Mainstream historians place the Mycenae civilization in the Bronze Age period, but the examination of Mycenae remains reveals evidence of advanced technology. According to mainstream history, the Mycenae civilization came out of nothing, and disappeared into nothing.

Of course it’s always some sort of a mystery when they cannot explain uncomfortable things that contradict their forged history.

I’m not saying all of official history of Rome is fraudulent, but much of it seems off. I don’t believe that Roman Empire were these great builders, inventors, because much of what they say was built or invented by the Romans had already existed long before the Romans. Also when did the Roman soldiers have time to go around the world building architectural masterpieces like roads, bridges, aqueducts, monuments, villas, mansions, amphitheatres, etc..? When did they have time to do all this when according to official history of Rome, Roman armies were always invaded and attacked from all sides constantly? Also since when soldiers are great builders and architects? I believe the history of Etruscans, Greeks and Romans is very distorted

This Capitoline wolf was presented as an ancient artifact of Rome, util some female expert examined it and said it isn’t ancient but medieval

This is details about that expert Anna Maria Carruba who declared the Capitoline Wolf to be not ancient but medieval

How many more artifacts or other forms of evidence they officially present to us as evidence to prove the existence of something or someone ancient, when in reality, their so-called ancient evidence is actually medieval, late Renessance. Unfortunately until just recently, people everywhere blindly absorbed the official information without question

This statue of supposedly Marcus Aurelius, is presented as another artefact of Ancient Rome. However, people never questioned, how did they identify this monument as Marcus Aurelius? Historians will point to the inscriptions on the monument, but the inscriptions are a later Renessance addition. There is some information about how they were able to identify this monument as Marcus Arelious, but I have to search for it. Apparently some professional/expert guy, I have to look up his name, decided to search through ancient coins, just to see if he could compare the depictions on the ancient coins to this monument. Well, he supposedly found that this monument looks very similar to the depiction of Marcus Arelious on an ancient coins, and this is how they decided that this statue is Marcus Arelious