⚡️ Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia Concerning the Expiration of the Russia-US New START Treaty (February 4, 2026)

On February 5, 2026, the life cycle of the Russian-US Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (#NewSTART) comes to an end; it was signed by the Parties on April 8, 2010, entered into force on February 5, 2011, and was extended for a five-year period in February 2021 on the basis of a relevant one-time option provided for in this agreement.

In February 2023, the Russian Federation suspended the New START Treaty against the backdrop of the unsatisfactory state of affairs with the implementation of certain aspects of the Treaty, as well as due to the absolutely unacceptable steps by the United States running counter to the fundamental principles and understandings of the agreement enshrined in its preamble.

It was a compelled measure and an inevitable response of the Russian Side to the extremely hostile policy of the Biden administration which resulted in the fundamental change in the security situation, as well as to a number of illegitimate steps taken by Washington in the context of specific provisions of the New START Treaty, which together constituted a material breach incompatible with the Treaty being further implemented in a full-fledged manner.

Among the key negative factors, it is worth to highlight the destabilizing actions of the United States in the field of missile defense, contrary to the inseparable interrelationship between strategic offensive and strategic defensive arms enshrined in the New START Treaty. <...>

Despite some obvious problematic moments, basically the New START Treaty used to fulfill its key functions. The conclusion of the Treaty and the years of its initially successful implementation helped to discourage the strategic arms race, allowing for significant reductions in the parties' arsenals. At the same time, due to the restrictions applied in this area a sufficient level of predictability was ensured on a long-term basis. <...>

In parallel to suspending this agreement, the Russian Federation announced the intention to voluntarily maintain its commitment to the central quantitative limits on weapons regulated by the New START until the end of the Treaty's life cycle in February 2026. At that time, the United States followed suit, announcing its readiness to act in a similar manner.

Striving to extend the positive effect of such reciprocal measures in terms of maintaining balance and certainty in the field of strategic offensive arms during the current turbulent period, our country took an additional constructive step. On September 22, 2025, the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin publicly proposed that the Parties to the New START Treaty commit to voluntary self-limitations to keep the quantitative ceilings on the relevant weapons specified in the Treaty for at least one year after the termination of the agreement.

However, no formal official response from the United States with regard to the Russian initiative has been received through bilateral channels. <...> It means that our ideas have been deliberately left unanswered. <...>

In the current circumstances, we assume that the Parties to the New START are no longer bound by any obligations or symmetrical declarations in the context of the Treaty, including its core provisions, and are in principle free to choose their next steps. <...>

🇷🇺 The Russian Federation remains ready to take decisive military-technical measures to counter potential additional threats to the national security. At the same time, our country remains open to seeking politico-diplomatic ways to comprehensively stabilize the strategic situation on the basis of equal and mutually beneficial dialogue solutions, if the appropriate conditions for such cooperation are shaped.

Read in full

اليوم بدأنا عملنا الميداني لهذا العام. رزنا تلين أم جماجم يقفان مثل شقيقتين على كلا جانبين نهر سوزوكا القديم، فرع من نهر الفرات القديم، حوالي 4,5  كم في اتجاه مجرى النهر من دحيلة.
كلا الموقعان وخاصة الموقع الأكبر، يتم نهبهما بشدة. إنهم لم يحتاجوا إلى الفخار المكسر ولذلك رموا جرة كاملة تقريبا بعيدا عن حفرتهم (الصورة اليسرى).
كما قاموا بعمل الحفرة في النهر القديم (الصورة اليمنى). خلال البحث عن شيء، كسروا بناء الطوب المخبوز. بدون التنقيب أو القياس المغناطيسي لا تستطيع أن نقول ما قد يكون هذا البناء: ربما جسر أو منظم أو رصيف للسفن؟
الفخار في أم الجماجم- ٢، الموقع الأصغر، هو يشبه ما لدينا في دحيلة، من العصر البابلي الحديث. أما الفخار في أم الجماجم-١، فهو يبدو مختلفا إلى حدا ما، كما لو كان يعمل بشكل أفضل ولكن علينا العودة وإعادة تقييم لاحقا.
نهب المواقع الأثرية هو كارثة للعراق، حيث أن اللصوص يلحقون الضرر بالطبقات والأشياء، التي يبيعونها في السوق فقدت سياقها. قد يكون في مكان ما، في السوق السوداء، النصوص المسمارية أو أشياء أخرى من دحيلة أو أم الجماجم أو مواقع أخرى، لكننا لن تعرف إبدا من أين تأتي هذه القطع الأثرية: لقد خسرت إلى الأبد معظم المعلومات المتعلقة بها