Liam's Story - Suicide Prevention - Fargo Police Department

Good parents are parents WHO TALK ABOUT EVERYTHING without fear!
https://t.iss.one/BlowjobTelegram/18
https://t.iss.one/BlowjobTelegram/9

Ignoring will not fix issues.
https://t.iss.one/SuicideRape
https://t.iss.one/AliceSchembri
https://t.iss.one/AntoniaBarra
https://t.iss.one/NeverForgetTelegram
https://t.iss.one/TraumaTelegram
https://t.iss.one/EmpathyTelegram

Yes governments, this about you too!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/123
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/122
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/100
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/89
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/94
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/82
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/81
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/66
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/110
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/70
etc.

Yes Israel, Switzerland and Norway, you too!
https://t.iss.one/IsraeliFacts/203
https://t.iss.one/IsraeliFacts/127
https://t.iss.one/IsraeliFacts/320
https://t.iss.one/IsraeliFacts/209
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/101
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/88
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/42

Yes Amnesty, you too!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/101
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyShit/95
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit/722
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit/723

Yes Facebook, you too!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/125

Not today Not Tomorrow!
https://t.iss.one/NotTodayTelegram
https://t.iss.one/TikTokFakeReality

"Il sesso senza consenso è stupro" E OMICIDIO INDIRETTO!
https://t.iss.one/StuproSuicidio/4

Backup by @RapeTelegram
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme

La sala dello stupro

Backup by @RapeTelegram
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme

Stupro Catania, Renzi : "Una sconfitta dello Stato"

Bene, non sappiamo 0 sulla politica in Italia ... quindi non possiamo dire niente ma

let we remember this video by Meloni
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/360

or this video
https://t.iss.one/AfDFakten/736

so we cannot really say what are all pro and contras of Meloni, since we follow too less what is happening in Italy, but one thing is sure:

a) every politicians is shit in some ways!
https://t.iss.one/SciencePoliticalParty/55

b) every single topic need to be considered as single topic!
https://t.iss.one/AfDScheisse/40
so if someone is saying good things about A, doesn't mean B is good too!

c) this is a problem about all things! Renzi, don't think you are innocent ...
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/108

d) what about Rondo, The Borderline and similar things??!
https://t.iss.one/RondodasosaTelegram
https://t.iss.one/TheBorderlineTelegram
https://t.iss.one/SocialNetworkFacts

e) without talking about the fact that no one is take responsibility
https://t.iss.one/InPrisonNOW/7
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/128

f) without empathy
https://t.iss.one/PoliticiansEmpathy
https://t.iss.one/AspergerSyndromeTelegram/42

near all other shitty laws ...
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/366
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/367

Niña de 3 años fue violada y golpeada hasta la muerte: el padrastro y abuelo son sospechosos

Backup by @RapeTelegram
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme

Castrazione chimica ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other!

Sexual crimes are a significant public health problem, e orts to prevent recidivism and protect the community are worthy, and public safety can take precedence over criminal’s rights. Chemical castration reduces recidivism effectively when offered to sexual o enders within the context of simultaneous comprehensive psychotherapeutic treatment. However, chemical castration under the current laws is vaguely positioned between punishment and treatment due to lack of informed consent by the recipient, and so remains a problematic issue for medical ethics. Therefore, physicians are obligated to very closely monitor any potential treatment complications in sexual o enders undergoing chemical castration.

Chemical castration has some advantages over surgical castration. First, although chemical castration is potentially life-long for some offenders, it might allow sexual offenders to have normal sexual activity in context with psychotherapy❗️

NOPE! ZERO SEX FOR CRIMINALS! just 🚓 for 20 years and after that 💉+⚰️ ⚱️ Amen!
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2076
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2077
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2087

Sure, better this than nothing, BUT nope, if we can use 💉!

Plus remember, NO VIP SUICIDE!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/75
and we need to work even on way to reduce such things = EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION!
https://t.iss.one/EducateYourKids
https://t.iss.one/BlowjobTelegram
because no castration / death sentence or prison will reduce crimes to 0! There is NO ANSWER how much they can reduce crimes
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/73
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/74
No matter what reducing to 0 is an utopia too ...

Plus let we remember all crimes not reported to the police ... so don't talk about this bullshit recidivism ... since no one know if a raper released from prison really raped a girl again!
https://t.iss.one/RecidivismFacts/166
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2041
https://t.iss.one/VergewaltigungFakten/453
etc.

See next post

Castrazione chimica ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other! Part 2

Part 1 https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2119

Studies of the use of antiandrogenic drugs report similar efficacy and a large meta-analysis of treatment in sex offenders found that "organic" interventions (surgical castration and hormones) reduce recidivism much more than any other treatment approach (although the authors found that nowadays drugs are usually used alongside psychological treatment). Reduced doesn't mean REMOVED!

Let we check your cited "Lösel F, Schmucker M. The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis." ... instead of writing just text without stats ...

First: Published: April 2005 🤦‍♂️ Crimes changed a lot since 2005!!!

Second: remember that STATS ARE SHIT!!!
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2102

Third: let we check this MA, without doing a detailed verification

CG = comparison group; TG = treatment group

75% of the studies stopped to follow that after 7 years ... many already 1 year

ARE WE SERIOUSLY?! A FOLLOW UP SHOULD BE AT LEAST 10-30 years! not 1 year ... plus exactly how you got such data??? HAVE YOU ASKED CRIMINALS "HAVE YOU RAPED AGAIN"?🤦‍♂️
We already said that many rape get not resolved or reported ... = they never go in prison!!!
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2077
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2041
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2042

Sample sizes (TG + CG) varied from 15 to 2,557 (Md = 118). Roughly one- third of the comparisons contained less than 50 offenders. Only seven comparisons were based on a randomized design 🤦‍♂️ ...

Child molestation was most frequent, followed by rape. However, no program referred exclusively to rapists.

Most frequently, treated offenders had participated voluntarily 🤦‍♂️

It was mainly based on entries in official criminal records. Few studies additionally used information from the offenders themselves 🤣 oh god, they really did what we wrote before 🤦‍♂️

Castrazione chimica ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other! Part 2

Part 1 https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2119

It was mainly based on entries in official criminal records. Few studies additionally used information from the offenders themselves 🤣 oh god, they really did what we wrote before 🤦‍♂️
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2120

The 74 comparisons reporting data on sexual recidivism revealed an average recidivism rate of 12% for treated groups and 24% for comparison groups (unweighted average).

However, when we calculated the recidivism rates for treated and comparison participants taking the respective sizes of TG and CG in the 74 comparisons into account the difference in recidivism rates vanished completely (11% each for treated and comparison participants).

These conflicting results were due to great differences in the size of TG and CG in some primary studies.

Studies with very large control groups and comparatively small treated groups 🤦‍♂️ ...

Therefore, one should not draw conclusions from these averages❗️❗️ (not written by us, but by the researcher!!)

Plus checking in detail the previous values they show
Sexual recidivism 11.1 vs 17.5
Violent recidivism 6.6 vs 11.8
Any recidivism 22.4 vs 32.5

So where exactly is your 12 vs 24???!

Mode of treatment
Surgical castration 10%
Hormonal medication 7.5% 🤦‍♂️
Plus a lot other things not related!

Particularly in sexual recidivism, our general effect is larger than that found by Hanson et al. (2002) in their meta-analysis of psychological treatment (27%). Most probably, this is due to our inclusion of both psychological and medical modes of treatment.

Sex offenders receiving surgical castration are a highly selected and motivated group 🤦‍♂️
Hence, the TGs probably are at lower risk of reoffending than the CGs (again, the researcher is writing that, NOT US!)

As with surgical castration, we must take this into account when considering the relatively strong effect of hormonal medication.

See next post

Chemical Castration ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other! Part 3

Part 1 https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2119

Treatment with medroxy-progesteronacetate (in the US; e.g., Provera) or cyproteronacetate (in Europe; e.g., Androcur) does not seem to work by normalizing extreme testosterone levels, but by strongly reducing more or less normal levels of sexual arousal.

In addition, there are serious negative side effects that frequently lead to noncompliance and dropout (e.g., Langevin 1979). The termination of medication may rapidly increase the risk of recidivism (Meyer et al., 1992).

Therefore, hormonal medication is indicated primarily for cases in which sexual arousal plays a central role in offending (e.g., Hall 1996) and should be accompanied by psychological treatment that supports compliance and has its own causal effect on sexual reoffending (Maletzky 1991; Meyer and Cole 1997).

Although treatment before the 1970s was clearly ineffective, neither programs from the 1990s nor publications after 2000 reveal stronger effects than in previous decades

For example, studies that include not only official recidivism data but also self-reports show larger effects 🤣🤦‍♂️

Conclusion: this meta analysis IS SHIT!

From the provisions of the article above shows that every person has the right to be free from inhumane punishment and degrading human dignity and status, in this case chemical castration is very contrary to Article 7 because at the time of application of chemical castration, the treatment carried out is inhumane or demeaning of someone.
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/101
https://t.iss.one/CannibalTelegram/159

See next post

Chemical Castration ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other! Part 4

The issue of chemical castration is a controversial topic in many scientific circles, dividing researchers and scientists in two campuses, pro et contra. To some extent, both sides have their own facts and arguments that support one side or the other.

Vedije Ratkoceri - South East European University: We consider that the use of chemical castration on voluntary basis on individuals who consider that they can’t control their sexual urges and need medical help, is a right thing.

Part 1 https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/2119

Let we check what other journalists write ...

Chemical castration has been found to be effective in reducing sex drive and the seminal fluid in a male. But this does not prevent sexual violence or aggressive behavior.

Even reducing the testosterone level to zero does not eliminate chances of reoffending. "One doesn't need to have an erection to be able to molest a child or rape a person," explains sociologist Andrej König from Dortmund University

"There are indications that it works, but there is no concrete evidence to prove how effective it is," Jürgen Müller, a Göttingen-based neurologist, and forensic psychiatrist, told DW.

To date, no international study has been conducted that could effectively evaluate the success of this treatment https://perma.cc/LG9E-3K2S

Small scale studies suggest that both these methods reduce sexually deviant thought, behaviour and reoffending rates. However, because it's impossible to conduct full trials of the drug using placebos, these results are not conclusive https://perma.cc/55K3-WE33

Dina Silvia Puteri - Universitas Airlangga: The implementation of chemical castration in Indonesia may able to reduce the number of habitual crimes or recidivists on sexual offender still raise the pros and cons. On the other hand, the effectiveness of this method in preventing these crimes is still debatable.

See next post

Chemical Castration ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other! Part 5

The Chemical Castration of Recidivist Sex Offenders in Canada: A Matter of Faith: It is concluded that chemical castration of sex offenders is ethically problematic, that evidence for its effectiveness in preventing recidivism is limited and of poor quality and that judges should avoid excessive reliance on chemical castration when deciding to grant conditional release to recidivist sex offenders.

Castration -- physical or chemical -- however, does not guarantee that a man will forever be sexually dysfunctional or that he won't again commit rape https://perma.cc/7KVM-FGN7

Joo Yong Lee: Surgical castration reportedly produces definitive results, even in repeat pedophilic offenders, by reducing recidivism rates to 2% to 5% compared with expected rates of 50% 🤦‍♂️ what does it means??! ... better not to investigate such thing ...

Nope, we needed to check the source of such thing. What they wrote is:

The main effect of surgical castration is a reduction of the circulating androgen level by removing the testes where approximately 95% of the testosterone is produced.

In Europe, estimated recidivism rates based on re-arrest or conviction were 2.5–7.5% in surgically castrated sex offenders versus 60–84% before castration (n 1200) with a maximal follow-up of 20 years (Heim and Hursch 1979).

Thirty-five percent of young surgical castrates retained sexual functioning (sex drive and potency) (Heim and Hursch 1979) and 19 out of 38 castrated sex offend- ers, whose penile erections were measured while viewing a sex movie, exhibited full erections (Eibl 1978).

In a prospective study (follow-up 15 years), Zverina et al. (1991) reported that 18% of 84 castrated sex offenders retained sexual functioning and that 21% were able to maintain sexual relation- ships with their sexual partner.

However, some physically castrated paedophiles have restored their potency by taking exogenous testosterone and then abused again (Stone et al. 2000).