Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Extra Album Genus Nulla Salus:
The Latin phrase "extra Ecclesiam nulla salus" (there is no salvation outside the Church) is a phrase referring to who is to receive salvation. The expression comes from the writings of Saint Cyprian of Carthage, a Christian bishop of the 3rd century.
The phrase is an axiom often used as shorthand for the doctrine that the "Church" is necessary for salvation, what the "Church" is however widely differs between denominations.
The Church is the congregation of God, the White race: Extra Album genus nulla salus.
The Latin phrase "extra Ecclesiam nulla salus" (there is no salvation outside the Church) is a phrase referring to who is to receive salvation. The expression comes from the writings of Saint Cyprian of Carthage, a Christian bishop of the 3rd century.
The phrase is an axiom often used as shorthand for the doctrine that the "Church" is necessary for salvation, what the "Church" is however widely differs between denominations.
The Church is the congregation of God, the White race: Extra Album genus nulla salus.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Reconciliation of Jacob and Esau:
Previously we have presented genetic studies which demonstrate a 3-5% Sub Saharan ancestry in modern Jewish populations.
However it is plausible that this is misidentified ANA admixture, which we would consider acceptable by one drop standards.
If this is true, Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews would have little difference to Italians and Spaniards, respectively; and would be authentically White. The other modern Jewish populations would still be non-white.
I doubt this is the case and continue to assert Jews are not White. However I want to explore the hypothetical of if they were, as many have been arguing for and against them during the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Is the reconciliation of Jews and Whites possible?
Or has the fighting been too intense and gone on too long? Assuming they were authentically White, I don't believe the issues are reconcilable even if they abandoned Judaism.
Many attempts to assimilate Jews into European society have been attempted over the centuries and it always ends in disaster for Europeans. From subversion to mass European death.
The latest of which caused over 100 million dead Whites, much from direct genocides within the USSR perpetrated by Jews.
Subversion of our institutions consistently normalise severe degeneracy, infanticide, miscegenation and debt slavery.
The solution to the Jewish problem was thought to give them their own nation, but with their own nation, they now have the means to cause true national destruction with somewhere to hide out when their destruction takes affect.
Mass importation of non-whites into White nations in attempt to truly genocide every last White person. When things go over the tipping point, they can skip out to Israel for safety and preservation.
Even with the threat on Israel right now, they continue their anti-White genocidal rhetoric. How could a people ever be trusted?
I don't believe such a reconciliation could ever take place, so we should stop arguing if they're White or not, they are never going to be an ally to Whites.
However for those who believe they are White, the only chance for such a reconciliation to take place is the complete destruction of Israel.
Without Israel, a place that:—
• preserves a Jewish culture.
• preserves an ethnic identity separate to Whites.
• preserves an anti-White religion.
• provides a national safety net to Jews if White nations are overrun.
—Jews will no longer be capable of ruining White nations because they will depend on their success and them remaining White for their own survival. But, could they even be trusted then?
An event where the brothers Jacob and Esau reconcile after much intense fighting, Genesis 33.
Previously we have presented genetic studies which demonstrate a 3-5% Sub Saharan ancestry in modern Jewish populations.
However it is plausible that this is misidentified ANA admixture, which we would consider acceptable by one drop standards.
If this is true, Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews would have little difference to Italians and Spaniards, respectively; and would be authentically White. The other modern Jewish populations would still be non-white.
I doubt this is the case and continue to assert Jews are not White. However I want to explore the hypothetical of if they were, as many have been arguing for and against them during the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Is the reconciliation of Jews and Whites possible?
Or has the fighting been too intense and gone on too long? Assuming they were authentically White, I don't believe the issues are reconcilable even if they abandoned Judaism.
Many attempts to assimilate Jews into European society have been attempted over the centuries and it always ends in disaster for Europeans. From subversion to mass European death.
The latest of which caused over 100 million dead Whites, much from direct genocides within the USSR perpetrated by Jews.
Subversion of our institutions consistently normalise severe degeneracy, infanticide, miscegenation and debt slavery.
The solution to the Jewish problem was thought to give them their own nation, but with their own nation, they now have the means to cause true national destruction with somewhere to hide out when their destruction takes affect.
Mass importation of non-whites into White nations in attempt to truly genocide every last White person. When things go over the tipping point, they can skip out to Israel for safety and preservation.
Even with the threat on Israel right now, they continue their anti-White genocidal rhetoric. How could a people ever be trusted?
I don't believe such a reconciliation could ever take place, so we should stop arguing if they're White or not, they are never going to be an ally to Whites.
However for those who believe they are White, the only chance for such a reconciliation to take place is the complete destruction of Israel.
Without Israel, a place that:—
• preserves a Jewish culture.
• preserves an ethnic identity separate to Whites.
• preserves an anti-White religion.
• provides a national safety net to Jews if White nations are overrun.
—Jews will no longer be capable of ruining White nations because they will depend on their success and them remaining White for their own survival. But, could they even be trusted then?
❤2
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Manifest Destiny: in an infinite universe, there is no such thing as overpopulation.
Genesis 26:4 — I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky, and I will give them all these lands.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Japanese Open Borders:
Many have been quick to rush, to get up in arms about what is rapidly taking place in Japan, however ultimately though, it is not in the interests of Whites to help the Japanese nor that the Japanese are successful.
It is however in our interests to exploit their continued plight into worsening conditions to gather sympathy for the West against immigration. Treating Japan as an example on why third world (non-white) immigration is bad for us, as it ruins their country.
It is also in our interests that a large country like Japan imports foreigners. Japan, which has a similar sized population (~125m) to the native White population of the USA (~180m) could host another 100m foreigners (like the US currently does), which benefits the West as if they don't go to Japan, they come here instead.
Asia is currently going through a demographic nightmare, in which India and China will lose 500m and 700m in population, respectively. Which doesn't include the massive loses of other Asia nations, which will exceed 2b in population loss, collectively. Given how industrious and competitive Asia is, they will need to replace their workforce to maintain their economies. They will compete relentlessly to absorb as many migrating foreigners as possible as global surplus births will soon dry up.
Asia absorbing excess third world population is only needed for the next few decades, as the TFR (fertility) of the third world will be below replacement by 2045 even in Sub Sahara Africa. Where they will no longer have surplus births to export, and lose their ability to mass export to the West.
But Asia will continue to need more, so given continued Western negative sentiment against foreigners, Asia making themselves more desirable to immigrants, and even Sub Sahara running out of surplus births, we will see foreigners emigrant from the West to the East for their next cash cow.
What is curious about Non fertility, is that not just Asians but even Africans quickly accelerate to far below sub 1 TFR in just decades despite huge pro-natal government policies. While Whites settle around 1.3-1.5 TFR at the lowest, despite 100 years of decline and billions of dollars in anti-natal propaganda. Whites are just more resilient and stablise, while Nons collapse.
If Whites can survive until 2100, we'll be at a point where the global Non population is sub 1 TFR and the threat of mass immigration has passed. But to get there we need to: close our borders, deport Nons and have more White children.
It truly is turning around globally for Whites. Just keep having lots of White children and advocating for White countries.
I am optimistic for our future.
Many have been quick to rush, to get up in arms about what is rapidly taking place in Japan, however ultimately though, it is not in the interests of Whites to help the Japanese nor that the Japanese are successful.
It is however in our interests to exploit their continued plight into worsening conditions to gather sympathy for the West against immigration. Treating Japan as an example on why third world (non-white) immigration is bad for us, as it ruins their country.
It is also in our interests that a large country like Japan imports foreigners. Japan, which has a similar sized population (~125m) to the native White population of the USA (~180m) could host another 100m foreigners (like the US currently does), which benefits the West as if they don't go to Japan, they come here instead.
Asia is currently going through a demographic nightmare, in which India and China will lose 500m and 700m in population, respectively. Which doesn't include the massive loses of other Asia nations, which will exceed 2b in population loss, collectively. Given how industrious and competitive Asia is, they will need to replace their workforce to maintain their economies. They will compete relentlessly to absorb as many migrating foreigners as possible as global surplus births will soon dry up.
The Artillery of History takes aim at the Orient (read the article).
Asia absorbing excess third world population is only needed for the next few decades, as the TFR (fertility) of the third world will be below replacement by 2045 even in Sub Sahara Africa. Where they will no longer have surplus births to export, and lose their ability to mass export to the West.
But Asia will continue to need more, so given continued Western negative sentiment against foreigners, Asia making themselves more desirable to immigrants, and even Sub Sahara running out of surplus births, we will see foreigners emigrant from the West to the East for their next cash cow.
What is curious about Non fertility, is that not just Asians but even Africans quickly accelerate to far below sub 1 TFR in just decades despite huge pro-natal government policies. While Whites settle around 1.3-1.5 TFR at the lowest, despite 100 years of decline and billions of dollars in anti-natal propaganda. Whites are just more resilient and stablise, while Nons collapse.
If Whites can survive until 2100, we'll be at a point where the global Non population is sub 1 TFR and the threat of mass immigration has passed. But to get there we need to: close our borders, deport Nons and have more White children.
It truly is turning around globally for Whites. Just keep having lots of White children and advocating for White countries.
I am optimistic for our future.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
White Wing, Not Right Wing:
We get too obsessed with ideological leanings, that our circles often will accept Nons and even kikes into our movement, as long as they present as "right-wing", whilst viewing Whites who present as "left-wing" as enemies. The only wing we should be is "White".
Judge a person, position or policy on it's positive impact on Whites and it's negative impact on Nons, regardless of leanings.
"Based" jewish racists–
"Based" black republicans–
"Based" hispanic tradcaths–
"Based" arab conservatives–
"Based" asian meritocracists–
—won't secure the White race.
Only Whites working together with Whites to further our racial interests, will secure our future.
We get too obsessed with ideological leanings, that our circles often will accept Nons and even kikes into our movement, as long as they present as "right-wing", whilst viewing Whites who present as "left-wing" as enemies. The only wing we should be is "White".
Judge a person, position or policy on it's positive impact on Whites and it's negative impact on Nons, regardless of leanings.
"Based" jewish racists–
"Based" black republicans–
"Based" hispanic tradcaths–
"Based" arab conservatives–
"Based" asian meritocracists–
—won't secure the White race.
Only Whites working together with Whites to further our racial interests, will secure our future.
🔥5
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
“Tell me what you think about this: A man had two sons. He went to the first son and said, ‘Son, go and work today in my vineyard.’
The son answered, ‘I will not go.’ But later the son changed his mind and went.
Then the father went to the other son and said, ‘Son, go and work today in my vineyard.’ The son answered, ‘Yes, sir, I will go and work,’ but he did not go.
Which of the two sons obeyed his father?”
“The first son.”
—Matthew 21:28-32
While both of the sons were liars, Jesus states the first son is the obedient one, comparing the Pharisees to the second son. Those who cloak themselves in the fascade of piety but disobey God and miscegenate, are worse than the wicked sinners who didn't.
The son answered, ‘I will not go.’ But later the son changed his mind and went.
Then the father went to the other son and said, ‘Son, go and work today in my vineyard.’ The son answered, ‘Yes, sir, I will go and work,’ but he did not go.
Which of the two sons obeyed his father?”
“The first son.”
—Matthew 21:28-32
While both of the sons were liars, Jesus states the first son is the obedient one, comparing the Pharisees to the second son. Those who cloak themselves in the fascade of piety but disobey God and miscegenate, are worse than the wicked sinners who didn't.
❤2🙏2
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
The Six Solas — of Restored Puritanism:
Scripture alone is sufficient to tell us the entire White race alone is saved by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone for the glory of God alone.
Faith alone saves, however only the White race has this opportunity, and they all will believe, in life or in death.
— The Adamic people are identified as the White race alone [Solus Genus].
— Christ preaches to the dead [1 Peter 4:6].
— All will believe [Psalm 22:27-28; Isaiah 45:23; Romans 14:11; Philippians 2:10; Revelation 5:13] and all will be saved, both the just and unjust [Acts 24:15].
❤2🙏1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
20240721_white_ethnogenesis.png
364.4 KB
Updated: White Ethnogenesis.
Original, Previous.
Read full comments on images.
Original, Previous.
Read full comments on images.
This is the general layout of the descent of contemporary hominins, according to our current understanding, which is speculative and everchanging, so should not be taken as absolute. ... focus should be placed on the Biblical standard: an Anno Domini era purity benchmark.
Christ, the Apostles/ Disciples and Paul all preached exclusively to Caucasians throughout Europe, West Asia and North Africa; not to a single Non race and then said it was done. Whatever we were at that point, God was satisfied with and the White race, the Europeans and their diaspora, alone descend purely from those people. From those people we can reasonably surmise absolute purity, and prior to is unimportant speculation that we investigate for further understanding, not further standards.
Note: 6% EE in WSHG is speculative and may reflect few WSHG pops, and perhaps no European related WSHG pops.
❤1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Misdirection: it's just the Jews.
Depending on their audience, they will point to literally anyone else as the "cabal" but don't you dare suggest them.
Illuminati, Freemasons, etc are the normie approved entities you can freely blame the woes of the world on, as long as you don't look further into these entities and see the Jew pulling at the strings.
Don't be led astray and lost down kosher rabbit-holes — it's just the Jews.
Depending on their audience, they will point to literally anyone else as the "cabal" but don't you dare suggest them.
Illuminati, Freemasons, etc are the normie approved entities you can freely blame the woes of the world on, as long as you don't look further into these entities and see the Jew pulling at the strings.
Don't be led astray and lost down kosher rabbit-holes — it's just the Jews.
🔥3
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Israel, A People Not A State:
Just not the people many might be deceived to believe.
The Old Testament places emphasis on a particular tribe of the White race (Adamkind), the descendants of Jacob-Israel, who would be known as the Israelites or Physical Israel, to distinguish them.
The New Testament breaks down that focus and expands Israel to the entire body of the White race (Adamkind), who would be considered descendants by faith: Spiritual Israel.
Physical Israel have long ceased existing as a distinct group, absorbed into others, however Spiritual Israel is alive and well in the body of the White race.
The state of Israel and those who claim to be Israelites, are frauds and not biblical Israel.
Just not the people many might be deceived to believe.
The Old Testament places emphasis on a particular tribe of the White race (Adamkind), the descendants of Jacob-Israel, who would be known as the Israelites or Physical Israel, to distinguish them.
The New Testament breaks down that focus and expands Israel to the entire body of the White race (Adamkind), who would be considered descendants by faith: Spiritual Israel.
Physical Israel have long ceased existing as a distinct group, absorbed into others, however Spiritual Israel is alive and well in the body of the White race.
The state of Israel and those who claim to be Israelites, are frauds and not biblical Israel.
🔥9👎2
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Shroud of Turin:
The Shroud is a piece of linen that bears the faint image of a man, which has been venerated as the image of Christ for centuries.
It however likely isn't authentic, but it doesn't matter if it is. Belief in Christ doesn't depend on the authenticity of a piece of linen.
A brief known history:
Study Abstract:
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/5/2/47
Summary:
The study published in 2022 (the study is 2 years old, why is everyone acting like it's a breakthrough from last week?) may prove the linen was produced much earlier than the previous 1988 study, proving the linen was produced around AD50-70 (still not early enough for crucifixion: ~AD33); however this doesn't prove it's authentic, just that the canvas used was already old.
Previous studies already demonstrated the image was created with pigments, and even the blood is a pigment not actual blood; as well as a bishop contemporary to it's first known historical appearance claiming it to be a forgery and claiming to know the artist responsible.
During mediaeval times, many fraudulent relics were produced and sold, so this is not uncommon.
Regardless, this doesn't mean that portrayal of Jesus as a Neanderthal by Israeli "scientists" is authentic; not even modern SSA admixed Levantines look like that, and we have actual evidence of what He looked like.
Lastly it's still a nice relic that should be preserved and held as a traditional icon, like any historical artistic painting of Christ.
But it is art and not an authentic image of Christ.
The Shroud is a piece of linen that bears the faint image of a man, which has been venerated as the image of Christ for centuries.
It however likely isn't authentic, but it doesn't matter if it is. Belief in Christ doesn't depend on the authenticity of a piece of linen.
A brief known history:
—1354: Exhibited in new collegiate church of Lirey, France.
—1389: Denounced as a forgery by Pierre d'Arcis, the bishop of Troyes (claiming he knew the author).
—1453: Acquired by the House of Savoy and deposited in a chapel in Chambéry.
—1532: Damaged by fire.
—1578: Moved to the House of Savoy's new capital Turin.
—1683: Moved to the Chapel of the Holy Shroud (chapel built for the shroud).
—1978: Microscopist Walter McCrone from STURP took samples and demonstrated the image was painted onto the Shroud with pigments produced from red ochre and collagen tempera, and the blood was not blood, but a pigment produced from vermilion.
—1983: Ownership transferred to Catholic Church after former House of Savoy king Umberto II passed away.
—1988: Three radiocarbon laboratories (U-Oxford, U-Arizona, ETH-Zurich) demonstrated the linen was produced between the years 1260 and 1390, coinciding with it's first known historical appearance.
—2022: X-ray dating of the Shroud demonstrated the linen was produced between AD55-74.
Study Abstract:
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/5/2/47
On a sample of the Turin Shroud (TS), we applied a new method for dating ancient linen threads by inspecting their structural degradation by means of Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering (WAXS). The X-ray dating method was applied to a sample of the TS consisting of a thread taken in proximity of the 1988/radiocarbon area (corner of the TS corresponding to the feet area of the frontal image, near the so-called Raes sample). The size of the linen sample was about 0.5 mm × 1 mm. We obtained one-dimensional integrated WAXS data profiles for the TS sample, which were fully compatible with the analogous measurements obtained on a linen sample whose dating, according to historical records, is 55–74 AD, Siege of Masada (Israel). The degree of natural aging of the cellulose that constitutes the linen of the investigated sample, obtained by X-ray analysis, showed that the TS fabric is much older than the seven centuries proposed by the 1988 radiocarbon dating. The experimental results are compatible with the hypothesis that the TS is a 2000-year-old relic, as supposed by Christian tradition, under the condition that it was kept at suitable levels of average secular temperature—20.0–22.5 °C—and correlated relative humidity—75–55%—for 13 centuries of unknown history, in addition to the seven centuries of known history in Europe. To make the present result compatible with that of the 1988 radiocarbon test, the TS should have been conserved...
Summary:
The study published in 2022 (the study is 2 years old, why is everyone acting like it's a breakthrough from last week?) may prove the linen was produced much earlier than the previous 1988 study, proving the linen was produced around AD50-70 (still not early enough for crucifixion: ~AD33); however this doesn't prove it's authentic, just that the canvas used was already old.
Previous studies already demonstrated the image was created with pigments, and even the blood is a pigment not actual blood; as well as a bishop contemporary to it's first known historical appearance claiming it to be a forgery and claiming to know the artist responsible.
During mediaeval times, many fraudulent relics were produced and sold, so this is not uncommon.
Regardless, this doesn't mean that portrayal of Jesus as a Neanderthal by Israeli "scientists" is authentic; not even modern SSA admixed Levantines look like that, and we have actual evidence of what He looked like.
Lastly it's still a nice relic that should be preserved and held as a traditional icon, like any historical artistic painting of Christ.
But it is art and not an authentic image of Christ.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hernán Cortéz edit inspired by Alaric The Barbarian's thread on how truly impressive the Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire was.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Puritan Fren Network:
Recently many of us have been much more active on X/Twitter, given the immense reach and audience it provides.
Inspired by the existing Groyper network, we are pushing our own: Puritans. As Groypers, while professing White Nationalist views, are accepting of Nons if they claim to be Christian.
This is unacceptable, and stricter standards must be set.
This isn't meant to be confrontational to them; this serves as a way to identify others who share our stricter views, who you can mutually follow, share and build up together with, to reach larger audiences under a cooperative web and promote our views.
That view being demographic and theological White exclusivity, per the Catechism. Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox, etc, are welcome to be part of this, as long as they maintain/ promote that view.
A friend has already been doing well promoting RP under FaithAndFolk, and has posted about the Puritan Network. Comment there to find mutuals to follow/ follow back and let's build a presence!
Recently many of us have been much more active on X/Twitter, given the immense reach and audience it provides.
Inspired by the existing Groyper network, we are pushing our own: Puritans. As Groypers, while professing White Nationalist views, are accepting of Nons if they claim to be Christian.
This is unacceptable, and stricter standards must be set.
This isn't meant to be confrontational to them; this serves as a way to identify others who share our stricter views, who you can mutually follow, share and build up together with, to reach larger audiences under a cooperative web and promote our views.
That view being demographic and theological White exclusivity, per the Catechism. Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox, etc, are welcome to be part of this, as long as they maintain/ promote that view.
A friend has already been doing well promoting RP under FaithAndFolk, and has posted about the Puritan Network. Comment there to find mutuals to follow/ follow back and let's build a presence!
❤1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
There Is No White/ brown Alliance:
Peace between Jews and other Nons is the greatest threat to White interests, they cannot stop fighting.
Nearly a year on, and I'm still seeing Whites in our circles believe in "multi-racial alliances".
There is no alliance.
When one race works with another, it's to further their own interests; not the interests of the other.
An exploitive cooperation, not a symbiotic alliance.
—Jews will only deport the anti-semitic nons, they still want nons to replace Whites. No "White-jew alliance".
—Nons only want to usurp power from jews, they still want to replace Whites. No "White-non alliance".
We must recognise this and play each group against each other, to achieve the aligned goal of the other; to our benefit, not theirs.
—Ride the non-wave to drive jews out of power and usurp it for ourselves.
—Ride the jew-wave to deport all nons, not just some.
Lastly, non-white e-celebs aren't our allies; nons like Sneako, AKL, Tate, etc just want access to White money and White women.
Peace between Jews and other Nons is the greatest threat to White interests, they cannot stop fighting.
Nearly a year on, and I'm still seeing Whites in our circles believe in "multi-racial alliances".
There is no alliance.
When one race works with another, it's to further their own interests; not the interests of the other.
An exploitive cooperation, not a symbiotic alliance.
—Jews will only deport the anti-semitic nons, they still want nons to replace Whites. No "White-jew alliance".
—Nons only want to usurp power from jews, they still want to replace Whites. No "White-non alliance".
We must recognise this and play each group against each other, to achieve the aligned goal of the other; to our benefit, not theirs.
—Ride the non-wave to drive jews out of power and usurp it for ourselves.
—Ride the jew-wave to deport all nons, not just some.
Lastly, non-white e-celebs aren't our allies; nons like Sneako, AKL, Tate, etc just want access to White money and White women.
👍3❤1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Sons of Noah:
You do not need to look further than the nations who descended from the sons of Noah to see they were all White.
Nothing in scripture suggests any of them were a different race than their father and would be a ridiculous to claim otherwise.
In fact, the origin of the popular claim that Ham became black and fathered the black races is from the Talmud (Sanhedrin 108b) centuries after Christ. It is entirely unbiblical.
The bible is a histories on the White race and their struggles, and Nons simply don't fit into any part of it, no matter how hard some try to squeeze them in.
You do not need to look further than the nations who descended from the sons of Noah to see they were all White.
Nothing in scripture suggests any of them were a different race than their father and would be a ridiculous to claim otherwise.
In fact, the origin of the popular claim that Ham became black and fathered the black races is from the Talmud (Sanhedrin 108b) centuries after Christ. It is entirely unbiblical.
The bible is a histories on the White race and their struggles, and Nons simply don't fit into any part of it, no matter how hard some try to squeeze them in.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
The Unshakable 14 Words, and Coomer Filth:
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children,because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the Earth.
The White race is worth preserving because White men, women and children are simply amazing: from who they are, to the wonders they create; not because of sexualised value nor to satisfy lust.
White women have immensely more value than being an object of lust; and frankly I'm tired of hearing the second half of the 14 words. That second half should be rejected and tossed into the fire, along with pornography.
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children,
The White race is worth preserving because White men, women and children are simply amazing: from who they are, to the wonders they create; not because of sexualised value nor to satisfy lust.
White women have immensely more value than being an object of lust; and frankly I'm tired of hearing the second half of the 14 words. That second half should be rejected and tossed into the fire, along with pornography.
🔥2
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Non Fertility Race To Zero:
New study by John Burn-Murdoch of the Financial Times— "Peak population may be coming sooner than we think" —vindicates my statement from early this year. We see Non TFR plummeting to zero at significantly accelerated rates, dropping below what the UN projected for them in 50 years time.
To truly understand the implications, we must also understand Nons have much higher RFRs than Whites, so experience more population decline than Whites, even at the same TFR.
It truly is turning around globally for Whites. Just keep having lots of White children and advocating for White countries.
RE: Open Borders
What is curious about Non fertility, is that not just Asians but even Africans quickly accelerate to far below sub 1 TFR in just decades despite huge pro-natal government policies. While Whites settle around 1.3-1.5 TFR at the lowest, despite 100 years of decline and billions of dollars in anti-natal propaganda. Whites are just more resilient and stablise, while Nons collapse.
New study by John Burn-Murdoch of the Financial Times— "Peak population may be coming sooner than we think" —vindicates my statement from early this year. We see Non TFR plummeting to zero at significantly accelerated rates, dropping below what the UN projected for them in 50 years time.
To truly understand the implications, we must also understand Nons have much higher RFRs than Whites, so experience more population decline than Whites, even at the same TFR.
It truly is turning around globally for Whites. Just keep having lots of White children and advocating for White countries.
❤1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Congratulations to President Trump! 🦅
Ready for another 4 years of winning?
Ready for another 4 years of winning?
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Women's Suffrage:
A movement that resulted in the 19th amendment to the United States constitution; allowing women the right to vote.
We often hear people blame poor voting outcomes to women being able to vote, but if we were to look at the history of voting (using Presidential elections as an example) we see White men and White women don't vote differently by any significant factor. The next nearest demographic (Latino men) vote by an average factor four times greater; the rest are incomparable.
Ironically women were first given the right to vote, to increase the White voting power by successfully diluting the share of Non votes:
"Votes of the White women of the State will be one solid obstacle to any measure that would impair either for them or their children the continuance of White supremacy." —Walter E. Clark, NC Supreme Court Chief Justice.
Women being able to vote ultimately never mattered, what mattered was Nons being able to vote.
Don't "repeal the 19th", repeal the ability of Nons to vote.
A movement that resulted in the 19th amendment to the United States constitution; allowing women the right to vote.
We often hear people blame poor voting outcomes to women being able to vote, but if we were to look at the history of voting (using Presidential elections as an example) we see White men and White women don't vote differently by any significant factor. The next nearest demographic (Latino men) vote by an average factor four times greater; the rest are incomparable.
Ironically women were first given the right to vote, to increase the White voting power by successfully diluting the share of Non votes:
"Votes of the White women of the State will be one solid obstacle to any measure that would impair either for them or their children the continuance of White supremacy." —Walter E. Clark, NC Supreme Court Chief Justice.
Women being able to vote ultimately never mattered, what mattered was Nons being able to vote.
Don't "repeal the 19th", repeal the ability of Nons to vote.