/g@cxbbot admixtools qpadm

left=Russia_Samara_EBA_Yamnaya,Turkey_N.SG,Luxembourg_Loschbour.DG,Russia_Karelia_HG

right=Mbuti.DG,RussiaMA1_HG.SG,Turkey_Epipaleolithic,Israel_Natufian,Italy_Mesolithic.SG,Russia_ Sidelkino_HG.SG,Serbia_Iron_GatesMesolithic,Georgia_Kotias.SG,Iran_Tepe_AbdulHosein_N.SG,Russia_Khvalynsk_Eneolithic,Russia_Steppe_Eneolithic

target=Lithuanian.HO

/g@cxbbot admixtools fst

pops=Russia_Samara_EBA_Yamnaya,Turkey_N.SG,Luxembourg_Loschbour.DG,Russia_Karelia_HG,Mbuti.DG,RussiaMA1_HG.SG,Turkey_Epipaleolithic,Israel_Natufian,Italy_Mesolithic.SG,Russia_ Sidelkino_HG.SG,Serbia_Iron_GatesMesolithic,Georgia_Kotias.SG,Iran_Tepe_AbdulHosein_N.SG,Russia_Khvalynsk_Eneolithic,Russia_Steppe_Eneolithic,Lithuanian.HO

/g@cxbbot admixtools count_snps pops=Russia_Samara_EBA_Yamnaya,Turkey_N.SG,Luxembourg_Loschbour.DG,Russia_Karelia_HG

White Race, Not Races:
There's an apprehension to seeing our race as truly one people. Often those in our circles will yap about the need to have a million microethno-states to preserve every tiny preceived European ethnicity.

Do these backwards people really believe we'll go out colonizing the stars whilst maintaining Europe as a caged and segregated zoo of microethnicities? Lunacy.

It is natural that Europeans will mix amongst themselves, it always happened (we're all just different portioned Bell Beakers) and it will continue to always happen; and that is good.

What isn't good is lack of segregation from other races who will taint the White genepool.

White Exclusivity is non-negotiable, and what occurs amongst Whites is natural, but should strive for quality.

Then one day, for no reason at all... Europe opposed Jews...

Religious Fundamentalism:
Fundamentalism— the strict conformity to mutual ideological standards.

Religion was never really a thing and only was labelled and categorised as such when several different religions either competed or co-existed. To the people their religion was simply what they understood as true, not some character trait you could apply or convert to.
What was fundamental (the religion, the dogma) was the shared immutable principles amongst a group of people; that was the person's affective religion.

To colonial Americans this fundamentalism (religion) was White Nationalism— belief in: Christ, American state, constitution, White racial exclusivity, etc (Manifest Destiny).

To the modern West this fundamentalism (religion) is multi-culturalism— belief in: anti-racism, racial equality, innate evilness of Whites, Jewish nationalism, etc.

It doesn't matter if these views are true or false, nor if they are contrary. The adherents will interpret everything in such a way to uphold the fundamentals of their de facto religion. If it can't be reconciled, it will be denied or ignored; the fundamentals cannot be challenged, that would be heresy.

Everything today is interpreted and reshaped to uphold racial equality, whilst hatred of Whites, whilst elevation of Jews. That's the dogma.
When we challenge the public on their indoctrination, we need to understand we are challenging their de facto religion and asking them to commit heresy.

We also need to understand the power in setting the dogma. Imagine the entire public believing with tooth and nail, that Whites must: remain pure, have lots of children, proliferate across the planet and become the sole inhabitor.
It wouldn't matter what is true, what is logical, the public would interpret and reshape everything to reconcile with and uphold these values.

Why does this become important? When you attempt to argue our positions logically, you will run into elaborate justifications.
—"Europe must remain White" Why? "Because it's for Europeans" Why does that matter? "Because Europeans deserve a home" What intrinsic value does that have? "Because Europeans are less violent and more intelligent" So blacks who are genetically predisposed for less violence and more intelligence are acceptable?

We argue from the assumption that our goals have intrinsic value, outside of fundamental principles, they don't.
The above conversation could play out against "why does racial equality matter" but it doesn't because today it's innate dogma that's been programmed into everyone.

Our principles matter because Christ said they mattered and that's immutable.

We can see studies on the power of this, in particular with fertility rates. No matter the policies countries who care about their TFR create (Hungary, Israel, South Korea, Japan, China) all their fertility continues to fall, because the people simply don't care, and contraceptives trump biological urges.
What's the one thing that does improve and preserve fertility rates in the modern world? Religious fundamentalism.

Only those who believe they have a religious duty to have lots of children, will have lots of children. Even atheists can have fundamental principles (de facto religion) to do so, but they lack incentive to believe so, like Christians have.

For many in the White advocacy movement, the fundamental is the 14 words:
—We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.

In summary, we need immutable principles, we would agree with the above but below is the most complete and concise for us:
—Christ is Lord.
—White exclusivity.

I will indeed bless you, and I will greatly multiply your descendants so that they will be as countless as the stars in the sky or the grains of sand on the seashore. Your descendants will take possession of the strongholds of their enemies.
—Genesis 22:17

European Folktale Monsters:
At what point do we realise that the traditional appearance of the fictitious demon* is inspired by Jews.
— *demons aren't a real creature/ entity biblically.

At what point do we realise that almost all European folktale monsters are inspired by Jews? From vampires (blood libel), witches (pointed hats, cannibalism), goblins (short, gold hoarders) and even leprechauns.

Soli Deo Gloria—The Protestant Work Ethic:
For the Glory of God alone.

Although this preacher is a bit of a grifter, this excerpt of his is actually quite good; assuming the following caveats:
—All are equal in Christ regardless of wealth and class.
—You do this for the glory of God alone.

There is nothing wrong with: working hard, having an abundance, being wealthy, being prosperous, having nice things, providing an abundance for your family; as long as it doesn't come before God.

Wealth is a resource, not an idol.

Blood Libel:
2000 years of coincidences.

Y-DNA Haplogroup:
The male Y chromosome is passed from father to son as a complete and exact copy, with the exception of random mutations. Because of this exact copy and misprint occurrence, we can track direct patrilineal descent and migration for potentially millions of years.
New haplogroups/ subclades are defined by new mutations (misprints) in the Y chromosome, which all descendants will retain. They cannot be mixed and are exact copies of the last misprint.

Given this information and tools to map such division, you can actually print the division of modern races very cleanly. Here I've put together a map based on the hominid cline chart I previously made, which demonstrates what I present regarding the isolated Caucasian cline as accurate.

—Iberomaurusian's "ANA" is simply more archaic pre-Basal Eurasian ancestry.
—Dzudzuana's "Basal Eurasian" is simply more archaic initial Basal Eurasian ancestry.
—Ancient North Eurasian's "East Eurasian" is simply eastern drifted Basal Eurasian ancestry.

Hypothetical Reconstructions:
—of the principle components of the White race.

Modern Europeans can all be broken down into different portions of these same four ancient populations. So I've put together a grid of reconstructions that don't attempt to black/asian wash them, like most people do.

The largest portion for Europeans is Dzudzuana, followed by ANE, followed by WHG and finally Iberomaurusian. The ordering is true for almost all Europeans.
—For example, Alsace-French are:
17.4% WHG 22.5% ANE
1.9% IHG 58.2% DHG

Iberomaurusian Reconstruction: Afalou.
Some people complained that the hypothetical Iberomaurusian reconstruction in my previous post wasn't blackwashed.
Let me introduce you to the reconstruction produced by a team of specialists at the Daynes Laboratory of Anthropology.

Iberomaurusians are approximately 55% Dzudzuana, and 45% Ancient North African (ANA) which is an archaic pre-Eurasian lineage, unrelated to sub-saharans.

They weren't black.

Not beating the demon allegations.

Israeli quadcopter drones play the sound of babies crying to lure Gazans from the Nuseirat camp into the dark, in order to ambush and kill them.

It's A WASP World We Fight For.

To avoid confusion:

slot 1: RACE: all Whites.
slot 2: CULTURE, LANGUAGE: speak English, the de facto White lingua franca.
slot 3: RELIGION: religious tolerance for Whites but morally Protestant should be standard.

Melting Pot—The Pan White Movement:
Contrary to modern belief, the Melting Pot was never an idea meant to extend beyond Europeans to other races.

The Melting Pot was a monocultural metaphor for a White heterogeneous society becoming more homogeneous, with a common culture; avoiding disharmony.

Of course this term was popularized by the multiracial play created by Israel Zangwill in 1908, a founding member of the Zionism movment and ITO (Jewish territorial organisation); however this is not how Americans viewed the melting point before nor after.

"What then is the American, this new man?" ... "leaving behind him all his ancient prejudices and manners, receives new ones from the new mode of life he has embraced, the government he obeys, and the new rank he holds. He becomes an American by being received in the broad lap of our great Alma Mater. Here individuals of all nations are melted into a new race of men, whose labors and posterity will one day cause great changes in the world."
—J. Hector St. John de Crèvecœur. Letters from an American Farmer (1782)

Does not transform the Amerindian, the black, the oriental emigrant into an American.

The fusing process goes on as in a blast-furnace; one generation, a single year even—

transforms the English, the German, the Irish emigrant into an American

. Uniform institutions, ideas, language, the influence of the majority, bring us soon to a similar complexion; the individuality of the immigrant, almost even his traits of race and religion, fuse down in the democratic alembic like chips of brass thrown into the melting pot.
—Titus Munson Coan, "A New Country",

The Galaxy

Volume 0019, Issue 4 (April 1875), p. 463

In Henry Ford's Ford English School (established in 1914), the graduation ceremony for immigrant employees involved symbolically stepping off an immigrant ship and passing through the melting pot, entering at one end in costumes designating their nationality and emerging at the other end in identical suits and waving American flags.

Blacks, Chinese, Puerto Ricans, etcetera, could not melt into the pot.

They could be used as wood to produce the fire for the pot, but they could not be used as material to be melted into the pot.

—Eduardo-Bonilla Silva, Race: The Power of an Illusion (2003).

The Melting Pot was great, when it only extended to the intended recipients: White people.

Hereditary Heathenism Excluded Jews:
In ᴬᴰ1222, Archbishop of Canterbury, Cardinal Stephen Langton, author of the Magna Carta (Libertatum), sentenced a deacon to death by burning at Oxford on the charge of bestiality, for marrying a Jewess.