The side that wants to win always beats the side that wants to be left alone.

If you do nothing in difficult times, your strength is limited.
Save those led to death and those who stagger to the slaughter.
If you say "we didn't know" won't He who weighes hearts consider this?
—Proverbs 24:10-12

Your enemies will never leave you, nor our race, alone. You must want to win.

One Struggle ✊🏻🇵🇸

The Walbridgepill:
Grant Walbridge is the "supervillian" of the film "You Don't Mess with the Zohan".
A corporate businessman and landlord of the Lower Manhattan area who plans to build a roller coaster mall on top of adjacent Palestinian and Israeli neighbourhoods.

When tensions/ conflict boil between the Palestinian and Israeli neighbourhoods, Walbridge didn't pick a favourite side and cry about it #PrayForBrownJews/Palis. Walbridge called up a bunch of White guys to larp as both muslims/ jews to exacerbate the conflict and ensure greater mutual destruction, so he could take it all. How did he lose? They stopped fighting.

This is EXACTLY what we should be doing, in it's entirety. Get a bunch of White people together to exacerbate the conflict, and ensure greater mutual destruction; and ensure it doesn't stop.
—Pose as Jews online and report Nons in positions of authority that are pro-HAMAS/Pali, so they have the potential of being evicted from their position or even deported (already examples of this occuring). Jews get the backlash.
—Pose as Arabs online and report Jews in position of authority that are pro-Pali death, so they have the potential of being evicted from their position (already examples of this occuring). Nons get the backlash.
—Pose as either and point out the crimes of each group, using the opposing group to project that message. We have jews talking about the Barbary Pirates and arabs talking about the holohoax, USS Liberty, ZOG, etc, and it's been unironically effective, the jewish message/ propaganda is severely slipping. It's been glorious.

Articles:
—German interior minister supports deportation of Hamas supporters. (Oct 2023)
—Wash U professor said he was fired for anti-Palestinian post as hundreds protest war. (Oct 2023)
—US antisemitic incidents up about 400% since Israel-Hamas war began, report says. (Oct 2023)
—Antisemitic hate crimes in London up 1,350%, Met police say. (Oct 2023)
—Tell MAMA records six-fold increase in anti-Muslim cases between October 7 and October 19. (Oct 2023)

Just like the fictional Walbridge above, you don't need to do all the work, just exacerbate tensions already existing, letting Jews and Nons fight amongst each other more intensely; and most importantly keep the tensions hot so that the fighting doesn't cease (how Walbridge failed).

Geopolitically as well, continued fighting turns Israel into a destabilized shithole warzone, that churns israelis and arabs into the meat-grinder en masse. Americans remaining involved isn't necessarily a bad thing either, as it prolongs the fighting (good), and despite complaints, the War on Terror ultimately resulted in a only few thousand US deaths while tens of thousands of israeli deaths and millions of arab deaths, and a huge resentment of Israel.
Sometimes I do wonder if the US intentionally funds conflict in the Near East, given that the #1 foreign aid recipient since 1949 is Israel ($263b), the #2 Egypt ($152b), and the #3 Afghanistan ($148b). Arming both parties 🎉?

What made WW1/2 so devastating for Whites is that it was prolonged total war domestically in White lands, which meant the longer the war carried on for, the immensely more Whites that died. Exerting the "prolonged total war" foreignly in MENA ultimately just means more and more dead israelis and arabs, the longer the fighting carries out for.

To summarise: Peace between Jews and Nons is the greatest threat to White interests, they cannot stop fighting.

Israel Must Fall:
There is no supporting either side, they all hate Whites and wish for our demise.
However #IsraelMustFall.

Israel is the base of operations for Jews to run refugee centres and NGOs based in the West, for the facilitation of importing Arabs who hate Whites. This doesn't absolve Arabs of blame, they are not forced into the West, they gleefully come to the West from regions free of war; Jews just facilitate their dreams.
Israel Must Fall

Israel is a White supremacist state.

It's brown but it would be lovely if the same rhetoric Jews spent so much time developing, which destroyed White colonies and demonised White nations, was what destroyed Israel in the end. It would be poetic.
There's no shame in using anti-White rhetoric against your enemies, when it severely harms them.

But 7m+ Jewish refugees in the West is worse than 2m+ palis :( they'll run everything.

Israelis average an iq of 92, I'm not worried about that. And with Israel gone (safe space) they won't be able to destroy the West.

Shapeshifters and the Ghetto:
If we remain in the internet ghettos we created for ourselves, no-one will hear our message, we will influence no-one. These virtual ghettos however can allow us to network underground, but we must use it to reach out to the aboveground and influence it.

Remembrance Day:
Lest We Forget.

Last weekend was Remembrance Day in many British Commonwealth countries, a tradition where each year on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month, 1 minute of complete silence proceeding the Last Post trumpet sounding, is held in remembrance and mourning of all those lost in WW1.

A ceremony not in celebration of the death of opposing White brothers, but in mourning of all White souls lost.

Such a tradition all Whites globally, regardless of ethnicity, nationality, etc, should partake in, to mourn the loss of all White souls in every conflict, on every side.

I understand it's passed this year, but if you didn't partake in Remembrance Day last weekend, I'd encourage you to have a minute of silence next 11:00am.

Figuring Racism in Medieval Christianity (2018)
— Lindsay Kaplan

This is written by a Jew (be cautious of details claimed) as a polemic against Medival Christian racism, however it does genuinely highlight significant Christian racism against non-whites through most of Christianity's history.

Scholars have understood the denigrating portrayals of the Jews’ unredeemed status as deriving from classical and early Christian traditions in which blackness and African peoples represent sin and the demonic. While portrayals of dark skin certainly participate in anti-black conventions, I argue that they also rely on associations of dark colors with death, hell, and damnation.

How Christianity reversed the Roman demographic decline & restarted cognitive evolution:
Article: Frost 2023

Excerpt:

DNA evidence shows a rise, fall, and renewed rise in mean cognitive ability in ancient Rome... The Imperial era saw a decline, possibly due to reduced natural selection and social factors like increased slavery and lower reproductive rates among the upper classes. Late Antiquity, marked by the rise of Christianity, showed an increase in cognitive ability, possibly due to biocultural changes in marriage and reproduction.

Rome went through cognitive decline due to lower fertility rates among the upperclass, unfit spouse selection and hypergamy. This decline only ended and reversed course with the rise of Christianity with their strict social familial standards, such as having many children (high fertility rate), monogamous spouse selection (pressure to select fitter spouses, only get one) and sexual modesty.

He wasn't wrong, depopulation of the nonwhite world truly should have been the highest priority of US foreign policy.

“Daddy, tell us the story of when Kissinger killed tens of millions of nons in Vietnam and Cambodia”

Kinism:
Kinism is an ethno-nationalist interpretation of Christianity, which posits that God wanted each race to remain isolated from each other and mutually thrive within their own unique living spaces. Obviously wrong theologically and illogical in itself, and is ultimately civic-internationalism; while we are White ethno-internationalists.

Theologically there is no ethnic partiality:
Romans 2:11 — no racial partiality in God.
Romans 3:22 — no sub-racial distinction in Christ.
Romans 12:10 — give preference to one another.
Romans 15:7 — accept one another.
Ephesians 2:19 — no more strangers and aliens, among our people.
James 2:19 — racial partiality is sin.
Leviticus 19:18 — You must not take vengeance or bear a grudge against any of your race, but you must love your brother as yourself. I am the Lord.
1 Thessalonians 5:15 — Make sure that nobody pays evil back with evil, but always strive to do what is good for your people.
—White exclusivity reconciles this by positing that the Adamic people are exclusively White, whilst the rest are fauna. No Adamic partiality.

Biologically Illogical:
However it is also illogical. Biologically each race is a competitor against each other, affording our biological competitors their own living space and resources, reduces the living space and resources available to our people. As each race fills the bounds of their living space and exhausts their resources, they will encroach and expand into the living space of others. The least efficient in space and resources (the least intelligent) will attempt expansion first, as a necessity to their survival; whilst the most efficient in space and resources (Whites) will be forced to reduce their own fertility rates to maintain stability.

Utility as a Stepping Stone:
Having said that, there's no need to be immediately dismissive of Kinism, such a view can be immensely useful for those who find the truth (White exclusivity) too much a leap from their humanism conditioning. We need to be well mannered about the view and those who adopt it, to encourage them further towards the truth, or at a minimum cooperate with them towards mutual goals; otherwise it'll become a stepping stone away from the truth, back towards humanism.

As an utility, it would be ideal for us to learn these talking points (I recommend @Kinist for resources, not endorsement) not as truth, but so we can first condition people with Kinism as a primer (if required), to in time condition them to White exclusivity.

The general gist of Kinism isn't so terrible, the theological defence and strive for an exclusive White living space (White ethnostate) through ethno-nationalism, which we need first and foremost. If every White was a Kinist, it would be a good thing and we could move towards an initial goal of a White ethnostate, but it must go beyond that, where the ethnostate expands gradually to encompass the world. A hypocritical Kinism (Kinism for me not for thee) or true White exclusivity (soteriological/ global) serve the same desirable conclusion.

An incredibly successful real life example of this is the United States (historically) which began as a small White only state that rapidly expanded to cover the entire North American continent, explicitly only for Whites.

White Exclusivity:
I've used this term a few times to describe our views. By it, the view expresses that both Salvation and creation is exclusively for the White race. A soteriological exclusivity and a biological exclusivity across the universe (among hominids), by positing that the Adamic people is exclusively comprised of the White race.

In summary, we should use and spread Kinism to make the views of White exclusivity more palatable, whilst bringing the masses to a view more palatable to us (Kinism > humanism). Given we live in times of persecution, we can also utilise Kinism as a guise to hide behind.

Ancestral Blood Memory

False Dilemma:
Often we are given the dilemma "would you rather your child marry a black Christian or a White pagan", with the expectation that Christians must pick the former. They would not.

1 Timothy 5:8
⁸ But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house [race], he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.

Scripture tells us that someone against his people (race) is worse than an infidel. It of course implies an infidel (heathen) is still bad, just not as bad; as well as implying you should care for those of your people (race) regardless if Christian or not.

We argue that Nons can't be Christians, so the choices are left with "black heathen vs White heathen". The former can't change their race, but the latter can change (correct) their faith.

Ultimately you should be both White and Christian, but the former isn't something you can convert to, so only they of the two presented have the possibility of becoming White Christians.

Catholicism:
From the Catechism:
—CC359: "St. Paul tells us that the human race takes its origin from two men: Adam and Christ... the first man ... received his soul..."
—CC404: "the whole human race is in Adam"

The Catholic Catechism teaches that Adamkind alone are human and have souls (based (C)athol(I)cs).

So it's an identification problem of the administration because scripturally and anthropologically, Adamkind have been identified as the White race alone, today:
— 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.

However the CC also teaches:
—CC596: Jews aren't responsible for Christ's death.
—CC841: Plan of salvation extends to Muslims.
—CC842-3: All religions are true.
—CC1935: Racism is sinful.
—CC2358-9: Homosexuals can be Christians.

It's possible to brush this off as "White Universal Reconciliation" or "White racial unity" when recognising only Whites are Adamic, but clearly that isn't what the Catholic administration intended for; but it's theologically sound in the CC (not a defense, don't be Catholic).

Hitting the max character count can leave the intention behind posts to be vague.

What was being demonstrated is I was correct when I claimed our (RP's) view of salvation is not different from the view of major Churches: all agree that the opportunity for salvation is with Adamic life alone. We only differ on how we identify Adam, which scripturally and anthropologically clearly is the White race.

Given this, the major concerning items in the CC (which I listed) don't seem so bad (perhaps even positive) when you correctly identify Adam, as only Whites. It presents as a position of White unity in this way.

The post wasn't an attack on Catholicism, but was presenting Catholics with a concise and theologically sound way that both adheres to the Catholic Catechism (CC) and the position of White Exclusivity.

Lastly, we're Protestant, so we don't encourage becoming Catholic, but we believe in Religious Freedom, so we are happy Catholics remaining Catholic.
We just want to help them defend White Exclusivity.

Was it worth it?