Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Stop Romanticising:
We all often make the mistake of romanticising the past —describe in an idealized, exaggerated or unrealistic fashion; make it seem better or more appealing than it really was— especially when it comes to old political movements, or nations.
We look to the past and pretend things would be better if they stayed a certain way.
"Oh man, I wish we were still 'Romans, Vikings, Crusaders, Nazis, etc' living in "this era, Empire, Reich, etc."
Perhaps you're right, but it's still not healthy to fantasize about rewriting the past, because it's already done; and what we forget is that none of these peoples nor periods were truly perfect, otherwise we wouldn't be in this mess today.
Each and everyone of them had their severe issues, faults, shortcomings, and attributes we don't entirely agree with. Not a single one of them perfectly aligned with our cause nor views, so stop larping as them.
It's as bad as shouting "we must return to the conservative 1980's when everything was perfect." Give it 20 years and we'll shout the same about the "conservative" 2020's, all precursors to decline.
We need to stop romanticising the past, attempting to larp as them, and instead look towards the future on how we can repair and build something that surpasses them all.
We too have been guilty of this, which is why we're taken the initiative to renovate both our name and logo, previously a National Socialist larp, redesigned to represent the core of our ideology in a professional manner.
Name:
Christian Aryanism: Implies that Christianity isn't inherently "Aryanist" or inherently about Whites. The word Aryanism is also quite larpy when we can just say White.
Restored Puritanism: from the Latin word Purus (Pure), we have Puritan, taking the same route as Puritans: purity of theology, we extend that to purity of ancestry (blood), and claim Restored to distinguish ourselves from other Puritan movements and imply we are restoring true purity of theology and ancestry.
Logo:
Cross and Swastika: we aren't a continuation of old German positive Christianity movements, nor National Socialist Germans, both are in the past and it's foolish of us to larp as them, given theological differences.
Cross and large White healthy family: original logo, with the core of our belief depicted: faith and race, Fides et Gens, purity of faith and purity of ancestry.
This isn't to say we dislike, or don't respect our past, nor the struggles our ancestors went through; they all did what they believed right at the time with the information they had available; but they all fell short and we can learn from their achievements and their mistakes to improve the future.
It's time we put down our larps and look toward the future; so to reiterate.
We need to stop romanticising the past, attempting to larp as them, and instead look towards the future on how we can repair and build something that surpasses them all.
We all often make the mistake of romanticising the past —describe in an idealized, exaggerated or unrealistic fashion; make it seem better or more appealing than it really was— especially when it comes to old political movements, or nations.
We look to the past and pretend things would be better if they stayed a certain way.
"Oh man, I wish we were still 'Romans, Vikings, Crusaders, Nazis, etc' living in "this era, Empire, Reich, etc."
Perhaps you're right, but it's still not healthy to fantasize about rewriting the past, because it's already done; and what we forget is that none of these peoples nor periods were truly perfect, otherwise we wouldn't be in this mess today.
Each and everyone of them had their severe issues, faults, shortcomings, and attributes we don't entirely agree with. Not a single one of them perfectly aligned with our cause nor views, so stop larping as them.
It's as bad as shouting "we must return to the conservative 1980's when everything was perfect." Give it 20 years and we'll shout the same about the "conservative" 2020's, all precursors to decline.
We need to stop romanticising the past, attempting to larp as them, and instead look towards the future on how we can repair and build something that surpasses them all.
We too have been guilty of this, which is why we're taken the initiative to renovate both our name and logo, previously a National Socialist larp, redesigned to represent the core of our ideology in a professional manner.
Name:
Restored Puritanism: from the Latin word Purus (Pure), we have Puritan, taking the same route as Puritans: purity of theology, we extend that to purity of ancestry (blood), and claim Restored to distinguish ourselves from other Puritan movements and imply we are restoring true purity of theology and ancestry.
Logo:
Cross and large White healthy family: original logo, with the core of our belief depicted: faith and race, Fides et Gens, purity of faith and purity of ancestry.
This isn't to say we dislike, or don't respect our past, nor the struggles our ancestors went through; they all did what they believed right at the time with the information they had available; but they all fell short and we can learn from their achievements and their mistakes to improve the future.
It's time we put down our larps and look toward the future; so to reiterate.
We need to stop romanticising the past, attempting to larp as them, and instead look towards the future on how we can repair and build something that surpasses them all.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Professionalism, Not Denouncement:
This statement and subsequent rebrand was not a denouncement, just an expression that we should not fetishize Romans, Crusaders, Vikings, etc and that we've personally been guilty of fetishizing both Hitler and NS.
We understand the achievements, views and inspiration all of them have provided historically and to us today, but we also recognise the mistakes and faults, many severe, and won't be dishonest about them.
The main point is that many of us take our fetishization of the past to unhealthy levels, living in the past, rather than moving toward the future. And taking it to absolutes: "X was right about Y so everything X ever said or thought was right", sincere evaluation and discernment go a long way.
I'm not going to make a carcriature of myself and these past figures, by being so over-infatuated with them that I start being unhinged enough to build Hitler altars in my living room, dress in SS uniform, name my children Adolf Smith, Hitler Smith, Goebbels Smith, and make cakes for their birthdays. And I wouldn't be doing this for Hadrian (Roman), Urban II (Crusader), nor Bluetooth (Viking). Study and learn from them, don't larp as them.
We can of course be influenced and inspired by the past, sincerely taking into account successes and failures, to build a better future for Whites.
Because it gets directly mentioned a lot, I'll directly address Hitler and NS (why I used them above as well), with the following severe faults:
- Demonization of Slavs.
- Compromised racial purity standards (Nuremberg).
- Haavara and Palestine Agreements for new Jewish homeland.
Unfortunately many take these faults to absolutes, presenting Hitler and NS as some kind of anti-racists, when that's just simply not the case.
They were just too soft on Nons/ Jews, and too hard on Slavs.
These weren't absolutes, Slavs with General Plan OST would have been slowly assimilated as Germans in Eastern Europe (after influx of German settlement), Rheinland Bastards were sterilized, Jews were second class citizens, mass Jewish book burnings occurred, Jews were rounded up, etc. But unfortunately they bought into the idea that an independent Jewish homeland was the solution to getting Jews out of Europe and stop them meddling in our affairs. Perhaps they would've improved their positions given more time, but we'll never know so can only go off of what occurred.
Objectively we have to understand his positions didn't work, and failed. No one is beyond reproach, nor above honest critique.
We can learn from the past, rather than repeat mistakes.
This statement and subsequent rebrand was not a denouncement, just an expression that we should not fetishize Romans, Crusaders, Vikings, etc and that we've personally been guilty of fetishizing both Hitler and NS.
We understand the achievements, views and inspiration all of them have provided historically and to us today, but we also recognise the mistakes and faults, many severe, and won't be dishonest about them.
The main point is that many of us take our fetishization of the past to unhealthy levels, living in the past, rather than moving toward the future. And taking it to absolutes: "X was right about Y so everything X ever said or thought was right", sincere evaluation and discernment go a long way.
I'm not going to make a carcriature of myself and these past figures, by being so over-infatuated with them that I start being unhinged enough to build Hitler altars in my living room, dress in SS uniform, name my children Adolf Smith, Hitler Smith, Goebbels Smith, and make cakes for their birthdays. And I wouldn't be doing this for Hadrian (Roman), Urban II (Crusader), nor Bluetooth (Viking). Study and learn from them, don't larp as them.
We can of course be influenced and inspired by the past, sincerely taking into account successes and failures, to build a better future for Whites.
Because it gets directly mentioned a lot, I'll directly address Hitler and NS (why I used them above as well), with the following severe faults:
- Demonization of Slavs.
- Compromised racial purity standards (Nuremberg).
- Haavara and Palestine Agreements for new Jewish homeland.
Unfortunately many take these faults to absolutes, presenting Hitler and NS as some kind of anti-racists, when that's just simply not the case.
They were just too soft on Nons/ Jews, and too hard on Slavs.
These weren't absolutes, Slavs with General Plan OST would have been slowly assimilated as Germans in Eastern Europe (after influx of German settlement), Rheinland Bastards were sterilized, Jews were second class citizens, mass Jewish book burnings occurred, Jews were rounded up, etc. But unfortunately they bought into the idea that an independent Jewish homeland was the solution to getting Jews out of Europe and stop them meddling in our affairs. Perhaps they would've improved their positions given more time, but we'll never know so can only go off of what occurred.
Objectively we have to understand his positions didn't work, and failed. No one is beyond reproach, nor above honest critique.
We can learn from the past, rather than repeat mistakes.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What It Means To Be A Puritan:
To maintain the purity of theology and ancestry.
Find love.
Start a White family.
Attain happiness.
Fides Et Gens, Inseparable.
To maintain the purity of theology and ancestry.
Find love.
Start a White family.
Attain happiness.
Fides Et Gens, Inseparable.
❤1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
American Jobs For Real Americans:
The 1930's President Herbert Hoover campaign slogan that inspired the deportation of nearly 2 million hispanics in 1931 alone (almost 2% of the US population), for exacerbating the overall economic downturn of the Great Depression, a push to free up employment for Whites; a slogan that implied that only Whites could be real Americans.
One famous of deportation being the Californian 1931 "La Placita" raid, which 400 hispanics were rounded in a Los Angeles park, thrown in vans and dumped over the Mexican border.
Raids like this occured all over the country, particularly with the INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) agency (original ICE), which simply deported if you looked hispanic, resulting in 60% of the deportees being US citizens exiled in Mexico.
While many cases like the above occured under the direction of city, county and state authorities in huge numbers, most of the 2 million deportees were self-deportations.
Why did they self-deport so rapidly? A series of legislative reforms ("American Jobs For Real Americans!") that required US citizenship to be employed in the US (spoiler: they checked skin not passports), denied all visa applications from Meso-America, withheld unemployment relief from hispanics, and most major manufacturers just blanket fired all hispanic workers (citizen or not).
The point is simple, the United States could get rid of all hispanics with relative ease: US citizenship employment requirement, US citizenship social-benefit requirement, US citizenship healthcare requirement, and revoke US citizenship from all non-whites.
Wouldn't even need to have immigration enforcement agencies, they would literally all leave, as they wouldn't be capable of living in the US.
The United States could end themigration crisis Mexican invasion today... if they wanted to.
The 1930's President Herbert Hoover campaign slogan that inspired the deportation of nearly 2 million hispanics in 1931 alone (almost 2% of the US population), for exacerbating the overall economic downturn of the Great Depression, a push to free up employment for Whites; a slogan that implied that only Whites could be real Americans.
One famous of deportation being the Californian 1931 "La Placita" raid, which 400 hispanics were rounded in a Los Angeles park, thrown in vans and dumped over the Mexican border.
Raids like this occured all over the country, particularly with the INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) agency (original ICE), which simply deported if you looked hispanic, resulting in 60% of the deportees being US citizens exiled in Mexico.
While many cases like the above occured under the direction of city, county and state authorities in huge numbers, most of the 2 million deportees were self-deportations.
Why did they self-deport so rapidly? A series of legislative reforms ("American Jobs For Real Americans!") that required US citizenship to be employed in the US (spoiler: they checked skin not passports), denied all visa applications from Meso-America, withheld unemployment relief from hispanics, and most major manufacturers just blanket fired all hispanic workers (citizen or not).
The point is simple, the United States could get rid of all hispanics with relative ease: US citizenship employment requirement, US citizenship social-benefit requirement, US citizenship healthcare requirement, and revoke US citizenship from all non-whites.
Wouldn't even need to have immigration enforcement agencies, they would literally all leave, as they wouldn't be capable of living in the US.
The United States could end the
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Following In Footsteps:
The United States was designed specifically for White people, no one else. Only White people can truly be citizens, only they are American.
All Nons are invaders and insurrectionists.
The very grievances warned of in the Declaration of Independence are occurring today, and White people are forced to follow in the footsteps of the Founding Fathers.
The United States was designed specifically for White people, no one else. Only White people can truly be citizens, only they are American.
All Nons are invaders and insurrectionists.
The very grievances warned of in the Declaration of Independence are occurring today, and White people are forced to follow in the footsteps of the Founding Fathers.
❤2
Forwarded from White America
“The signers of the Declaration of Independence never dreamed of the negro when they were writing that document. They referred to white men, to men of European birth and European descent, when they declared the equality of all men”
Fifth Lincoln-Douglas Debate: Douglas' Speech, in Abraham Lincoln: Speeches and Writings 1832-1858, p. 697
Fifth Lincoln-Douglas Debate: Douglas' Speech, in Abraham Lincoln: Speeches and Writings 1832-1858, p. 697
❤1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Below Replacement Fertility Isn't Necessarily A Bad Thing:
As long as a healthy eugenic segment of the White populace has a high fertility rate (at least replacement) then low fertility rates can be a useful tool to consolidate the race and emerge more eugenic, shrinking the more dysgenic portion of the race.
Given the above 2018 TFR chart, Whites actually have a good spread of TFR, with only the highest point (presumably most eugenic) above replacement rate (when ignoring the lowest point, which should be reduced below replacement).
The only corrective action here is reducing Nonwhite fertility below White fertility in each respective bracket, well below replacement.
We are already seeing this rapid correction take place.
It would be ideal to think of the world-wide fertility collapse to 0, as a modern Noah's flood, indiscriminately removing all dysgenic Whites, Non-whites, etc, without violence, death nor pain; just low births.
All that needs to occur is the best Whites have exceptional fertility rates.
As long as a healthy eugenic segment of the White populace has a high fertility rate (at least replacement) then low fertility rates can be a useful tool to consolidate the race and emerge more eugenic, shrinking the more dysgenic portion of the race.
Given the above 2018 TFR chart, Whites actually have a good spread of TFR, with only the highest point (presumably most eugenic) above replacement rate (when ignoring the lowest point, which should be reduced below replacement).
The only corrective action here is reducing Nonwhite fertility below White fertility in each respective bracket, well below replacement.
We are already seeing this rapid correction take place.
It would be ideal to think of the world-wide fertility collapse to 0, as a modern Noah's flood, indiscriminately removing all dysgenic Whites, Non-whites, etc, without violence, death nor pain; just low births.
All that needs to occur is the best Whites have exceptional fertility rates.
❤1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
TFR Consolidation Caveat:
An additional note, I wanted to mention drawbacks. Quality consolidation maintains the issue of: population shrinking, and Whites becoming a smaller demographic amongst the population, thus losing further economic and political power, and influence.
This isn't an issue in an ideal TFR spread (which Whites have) when each Nonwhite bracket is below each White bracket (which we don't have).
The chart is just an observation of current TFR trends, where they're satisfactory and where they're not; not a saving grace cope, things aren't okay.
The gist of the post was to express good quality Whites should have very high fertility, while poor quality Whites should be intentionally more conservative in their fertility. We shouldn't continue ruining quality for the sake of quantity.
In any regard, all Nonwhite fertility needs to plummet. It's rapidly dropping but it needs to reduce less than Whites.
An additional note, I wanted to mention drawbacks. Quality consolidation maintains the issue of: population shrinking, and Whites becoming a smaller demographic amongst the population, thus losing further economic and political power, and influence.
This isn't an issue in an ideal TFR spread (which Whites have) when each Nonwhite bracket is below each White bracket (which we don't have).
The chart is just an observation of current TFR trends, where they're satisfactory and where they're not; not a saving grace cope, things aren't okay.
The gist of the post was to express good quality Whites should have very high fertility, while poor quality Whites should be intentionally more conservative in their fertility. We shouldn't continue ruining quality for the sake of quantity.
In any regard, all Nonwhite fertility needs to plummet. It's rapidly dropping but it needs to reduce less than Whites.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Advance Australia Fair:
Is the national anthem of Australia. Written by Scottish-born composer Peter Dodds McCormick, the song was first performed as a patriotic song in Australia in 1878, and modified for use as an anthem by the National Australia Day Council and officially adopted on 19 April 1984.
Last year (1 Jan, 2021) they made a subtle change to the lyrics in which "young" in the second line is replaced with "one" to reflect the pre-colonial presence and legacy of Indigenous Australians.
Honestly it was just throwing Abos a bone to shut them up about futher modifying the song or replacing it; and guess what, it worked. They've all shut up since.
The change is dumb but it effectively alters the song in no significant way and doesn't even allude to Abos, actual Australians (Whites) can be "one and free" too.
The real victory is all the critics being too stupid to know what: "Advance Australia Fair" even means, odd phrase right?
Literally means to "make Australia White".
Advance White Australia.
Is the national anthem of Australia. Written by Scottish-born composer Peter Dodds McCormick, the song was first performed as a patriotic song in Australia in 1878, and modified for use as an anthem by the National Australia Day Council and officially adopted on 19 April 1984.
Last year (1 Jan, 2021) they made a subtle change to the lyrics in which "young" in the second line is replaced with "one" to reflect the pre-colonial presence and legacy of Indigenous Australians.
Honestly it was just throwing Abos a bone to shut them up about futher modifying the song or replacing it; and guess what, it worked. They've all shut up since.
The change is dumb but it effectively alters the song in no significant way and doesn't even allude to Abos, actual Australians (Whites) can be "one and free" too.
The real victory is all the critics being too stupid to know what: "Advance Australia Fair" even means, odd phrase right?
Literally means to "make Australia White".
Advance White Australia.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Who Brought Dingoes To Australia?
During their introduction, the continental shelves of Sunda and Sahul covered most of the area, however a significant barrier between them still existed.
Aboriginals didn't possess any seafaring technology at the time (nor when Europeans arrived), and didn't keep Dingoes as companions. In fact, seafaring peoples didn't inhabit this region until as recent as 3000-1000ᴮᶜ with the Austronesian expansion.
So who brought Dingoes across the void 8300ᴮᶜ? An already domesticated dog from one of the early lineages, transported over 10,000 years ago.
During their introduction, the continental shelves of Sunda and Sahul covered most of the area, however a significant barrier between them still existed.
Aboriginals didn't possess any seafaring technology at the time (nor when Europeans arrived), and didn't keep Dingoes as companions. In fact, seafaring peoples didn't inhabit this region until as recent as 3000-1000ᴮᶜ with the Austronesian expansion.
So who brought Dingoes across the void 8300ᴮᶜ? An already domesticated dog from one of the early lineages, transported over 10,000 years ago.
Forwarded from White Papers
"Whites are With Us"
Over 40% of Americans were willing to tell the Souther Poverty Law Center (SPLC) that the changing demographics of the United States “pose a threat to White Americans and their culture and values”.
In raw numbers that represents roughly 58.5 million adult Americans.
63% of young Republican men and 54% of young Democratic men, were willing to admit they viewed the demographic changes in the United States as a deliberate process to replace Whites.
A May 2022 Yougov poll demonstrated that nearly 48% of White Americans, regardless of political affiliation, believe that discrimination against Whites is a serious problem.
Tens of millions of White Americans are fed up with a system which aduses them, abuses their children, abuses their nation and abuses their race.
We've won the minds of Whites, now we must win their support
Read our full article, including graphs, sources and much much more data, here on our Substack.
Over 40% of Americans were willing to tell the Souther Poverty Law Center (SPLC) that the changing demographics of the United States “pose a threat to White Americans and their culture and values”.
In raw numbers that represents roughly 58.5 million adult Americans.
63% of young Republican men and 54% of young Democratic men, were willing to admit they viewed the demographic changes in the United States as a deliberate process to replace Whites.
A May 2022 Yougov poll demonstrated that nearly 48% of White Americans, regardless of political affiliation, believe that discrimination against Whites is a serious problem.
Tens of millions of White Americans are fed up with a system which aduses them, abuses their children, abuses their nation and abuses their race.
We've won the minds of Whites, now we must win their support
Read our full article, including graphs, sources and much much more data, here on our Substack.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Ancient White Americans:
When discussions regarding the potential of Whites inhabiting ancient America, the following are the prominent topics:
—Solutreans, Northeast NA.
—Kennewick Man, Washington State.
—Windover Archeological Site, Florida.
—Blond haired peoples, South America.
—Viking settlements, Northeast NA.
—Phoenician voyages.
—Roman voyages.
The Viking settlements were few, small and abandoned as quick as they started, leaving no lasting impact beyond some medieval ruins in Vinland (Canada). Greenland settlement was significant however if you count that.
Theories of large-scale Phoenician and Roman (and even Viking) voyages to the New World are common and widespread, however likely not true. There's no DNA traces of any of these groups, if they came to the Americas, they were few, and either left or died out, leaving no lasting impact. With the potential exception of acting as a temporary minority ruling elite, producing architecture, and likely founding Mesoamerican-Script (I would argue this is the case).
Windover and Kennewick archeological sites, which appeared rather European skeletally, were "proven to be actually Amerindian" using fallacious points. That point being ignoring ANE ancestry.
Ancient North Eurasians:
A significant portion (40-60%) of Amerindian DNA (ancient and modern) comes from an ancient Caucasian group called ANE (Ancient North Eurasians), a group modern Europeans have a significant amount of DNA from.
The ANE that traveled across and settled the Americas, would have already been significantly mixed with East Asians, but to varying degrees, some significantly purer than others (perhaps many genuinely pure), but they traveled with lots of East Asians and hybridised with them to produce modern Amerindians.
What you should note is that ANE are the origin of blond hair, so many of the mixed peoples that settled the Americas would have the genes responsible for blond hair, and many likely expressed this gene (especially the purer ANE individuals).
Considering this, it is very likely the Spanish accounts of finding blond hair peoples, and elite, were accurate, they would however be mixed regardless. Possibly an elite built on keeping their ancestry as pure as possible to continue expressing this blond gene (what ancient Egyptian elite did with redhead).
It's however clear what caused the gene to die out, the numerous accounts of Amerindians sacrificing blond haired peoples...
With the Kennewick man, he was 47% White (ANE), and likely maintained a more Caucasian appearance due to recent mixing. I can't imagine the story is much different for the Windover site (don't have public access to DNA to check for ourselves).
The Solutreans however aren't ANE, and descend from ancient French/ Spanish EEMH (Cro Magnon). These peoples migrated to North America from Europe and were never mixed, as there were no other peoples already in the Americas at the time, and migrated from a mono-ethnic region (Europe), unlike the multi-ethnic East Siberia.
Solutreans unfortunately were ethnically replaced and absorbed by the latter ANE-mixed Asians. Outside of haplogroups in modern Amerindians, Solutreans left little genetic impact; whatever caused them to get wiped out so consistently, as to leave little genetic impact on modern Amerindians, is up for debate, and is likely caused by remaining small hunter-gatherer groups, killed by major natural disasters.
Summary:
White influence and settlement in the Americas has always been small and minimal, until Christopher Columbus.
I'd argue their impressive architectural feats (impressive for them, eh for us), and the invention of their alphabet, were the fault of White travelers, or a White ruling elite.
But for the most part, they've always been mixed hapas, living in mud-huts, elevated by their significant (40-60%) White (ANE) admixture.
We all get excited about American pre-history, but for the most part nothing much happened, what we should get excited over is that Whites conquered it all and built a White civilization that the world awes over.
When discussions regarding the potential of Whites inhabiting ancient America, the following are the prominent topics:
—Solutreans, Northeast NA.
—Kennewick Man, Washington State.
—Windover Archeological Site, Florida.
—Blond haired peoples, South America.
—Viking settlements, Northeast NA.
—Phoenician voyages.
—Roman voyages.
The Viking settlements were few, small and abandoned as quick as they started, leaving no lasting impact beyond some medieval ruins in Vinland (Canada). Greenland settlement was significant however if you count that.
Theories of large-scale Phoenician and Roman (and even Viking) voyages to the New World are common and widespread, however likely not true. There's no DNA traces of any of these groups, if they came to the Americas, they were few, and either left or died out, leaving no lasting impact. With the potential exception of acting as a temporary minority ruling elite, producing architecture, and likely founding Mesoamerican-Script (I would argue this is the case).
Windover and Kennewick archeological sites, which appeared rather European skeletally, were "proven to be actually Amerindian" using fallacious points. That point being ignoring ANE ancestry.
Ancient North Eurasians:
A significant portion (40-60%) of Amerindian DNA (ancient and modern) comes from an ancient Caucasian group called ANE (Ancient North Eurasians), a group modern Europeans have a significant amount of DNA from.
The ANE that traveled across and settled the Americas, would have already been significantly mixed with East Asians, but to varying degrees, some significantly purer than others (perhaps many genuinely pure), but they traveled with lots of East Asians and hybridised with them to produce modern Amerindians.
What you should note is that ANE are the origin of blond hair, so many of the mixed peoples that settled the Americas would have the genes responsible for blond hair, and many likely expressed this gene (especially the purer ANE individuals).
Considering this, it is very likely the Spanish accounts of finding blond hair peoples, and elite, were accurate, they would however be mixed regardless. Possibly an elite built on keeping their ancestry as pure as possible to continue expressing this blond gene (what ancient Egyptian elite did with redhead).
It's however clear what caused the gene to die out, the numerous accounts of Amerindians sacrificing blond haired peoples...
With the Kennewick man, he was 47% White (ANE), and likely maintained a more Caucasian appearance due to recent mixing. I can't imagine the story is much different for the Windover site (don't have public access to DNA to check for ourselves).
The Solutreans however aren't ANE, and descend from ancient French/ Spanish EEMH (Cro Magnon). These peoples migrated to North America from Europe and were never mixed, as there were no other peoples already in the Americas at the time, and migrated from a mono-ethnic region (Europe), unlike the multi-ethnic East Siberia.
Solutreans unfortunately were ethnically replaced and absorbed by the latter ANE-mixed Asians. Outside of haplogroups in modern Amerindians, Solutreans left little genetic impact; whatever caused them to get wiped out so consistently, as to leave little genetic impact on modern Amerindians, is up for debate, and is likely caused by remaining small hunter-gatherer groups, killed by major natural disasters.
Summary:
White influence and settlement in the Americas has always been small and minimal, until Christopher Columbus.
I'd argue their impressive architectural feats (impressive for them, eh for us), and the invention of their alphabet, were the fault of White travelers, or a White ruling elite.
But for the most part, they've always been mixed hapas, living in mud-huts, elevated by their significant (40-60%) White (ANE) admixture.
We all get excited about American pre-history, but for the most part nothing much happened, what we should get excited over is that Whites conquered it all and built a White civilization that the world awes over.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
ane_amerindian.jpg
302 KB
A chart of the (ANE) Ancient North Eurasian (Caucasian) admixture in Amerindians.
Some of the available ancient samples we have, have nearly 60% ANE* which is rather incredible.
(*when compared to AG3, the significantly purer Caucasian ANE sample we have available today).
Amerindians are just ancient hapas.
Some of the available ancient samples we have, have nearly 60% ANE* which is rather incredible.
(*when compared to AG3, the significantly purer Caucasian ANE sample we have available today).
Amerindians are just ancient hapas.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
"The whole continent of North America appears to be destined by Divine Providence to be peopled by one nation, speaking one language, professing one general system of religious and political principles, and accustomed to one general tenor of social usages and customs. For the common happiness of them all, for their peace and prosperity, I believe it is indispensable that they should be associated in one federal Union."
—John Quincy Adams, 1811.
Incredible finding very old American quotes that express exactly the views we express.
Just goes to show that all Whites innately want the same thing: peace, prosperity, unity, to the exclusivity of their own race.
—John Quincy Adams, 1811.
Incredible finding very old American quotes that express exactly the views we express.
Just goes to show that all Whites innately want the same thing: peace, prosperity, unity, to the exclusivity of their own race.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The only obstacle between you and creating the White family you yearn for, is whether you have the will to better yourself and the will to seize opportunistic moments when they come your way.
We all have the power to better ourselves and seize opportunities, so never let it be an excuse.
Sin of Omission: the failure by a person to take an action that one "ought to do", and that is within ones power (James 4:17).
We all have the power to better ourselves and seize opportunities, so never let it be an excuse.
Sin of Omission: the failure by a person to take an action that one "ought to do", and that is within ones power (James 4:17).
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Don't Lower Your Moral Standards:
Making it very clear for everyone, that rape and pedophilia is absolutely disgusting. You should be repulsed by the very thought of forced sex or relations with a minor.
So there's no ambiguity, I'll define it: 18. It's not like one day someone pulled a number out of a hat and came up with it, it's a logical benchmark.
Objectively in nature, sex is for the procurement of offspring, thus sexual maturation is a prerequisite. The beginning of the maturity process (~12) is not maturation, which completes at ~17, thus an age of 18 ensures all are adequately mature physically. Prior, there are a plethora of severe risks.
No one should be adopting nor normalizing one of the main grievances we have against Lefty, Non & Jewish morality: pedastry and rape. Otherwise what complaints are valid against those who want to destroy us? That it's not us in their place?
It's not merely a competitive rivalry between us and (((them))), we're simply better than them, both racially and morally.
Making it very clear for everyone, that rape and pedophilia is absolutely disgusting. You should be repulsed by the very thought of forced sex or relations with a minor.
So there's no ambiguity, I'll define it: 18. It's not like one day someone pulled a number out of a hat and came up with it, it's a logical benchmark.
Objectively in nature, sex is for the procurement of offspring, thus sexual maturation is a prerequisite. The beginning of the maturity process (~12) is not maturation, which completes at ~17, thus an age of 18 ensures all are adequately mature physically. Prior, there are a plethora of severe risks.
No one should be adopting nor normalizing one of the main grievances we have against Lefty, Non & Jewish morality: pedastry and rape. Otherwise what complaints are valid against those who want to destroy us? That it's not us in their place?
It's not merely a competitive rivalry between us and (((them))), we're simply better than them, both racially and morally.
❤1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Fertility Windows:
As many know, there are optimal ages to conceive and birth children; optimal for both the health of the mother during pregnancy and labour, and the quality of the child's health/ genetics.
Most people unfortunately only focus on a single age factor: advanced age of the mother.
However, the advanced age of the father, as well as the premature age of both the mother and father, also have a huge impact.
In summary, the optimal fertility window is 18-35 years old, with the golden years between 20-24 years old, for both males and females.
Below are some studies listing the major risks associated with having children outside this window. It should be noted that this is only increased risks, not a guarantee it will actually occur to you.
Being smart, healthy and attentive can overcome odds.
Adolescent pregnancy (12-17) has increased risks of: ¹
—preterm births, foetal growth restriction, low birth-weight, episiotomy, uterine revision, low APGAR score (poor birth health), cephalopelvic disproportion, chronic/ gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage, anaemia, cervical laceration, low urinary tract infection, humeral dystocic presentations (shoulders stuck), stillbirth, neonatal death and death (mother).
Advanced maternal age pregnancy (35+) has increased risks of: ¹ ²
—infertility, preterm births,, chromosomal issues (genetic disorders, down-syndrome, etc), emergency caesarean, intrauterine growth restriction, low birth-weight, congenital anomaly, gestational diabetes mellitus, low APGAR score (poor birth health), placental abruption, chronic/ gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage, placenta praevia, vasa praevia, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, abnormality of fetal presentation, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, stillbirth, neonatal death and death (mother).
Adolescent siring (12-17) has no increased risks:
—can't find any studies that suggest there is any risks associated with very young aged fathers, as there is no genetic risks and fathers don't carry the child; so risks from an undeveloped body aren't applicable. Very young aged mothers have no genetic risks either, but carry significant risks to their health and the child's health (even into adulthood) due to an undeveloped body.
Advanced paternal age siring (35+) has increased risks of: ¹
—infertility, schizophrenia, sperm DNA damage, high rate of mutations (causes a plethora of defects (basically everything here is caused by this)), accumulated chromosomal aberrations, preterm births, low birth-weight, low APGAR score (poor birth health), birth defects, increased cancer risk in offspring (breast, prostate, nervous system, etc), congenital heart defects, retinoblastoma, autosomal dominant diseases, achondroplasia, childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, cleft lip, cleft palate, stillbirth snd neonatal death.
Summarize:
—Adolescent Maternal Age: risk for poor health of mother and child.
—Advanced Maternal Age: risk for poor health of mother and child; risk for poor genetics of child.
—Adolescent Paternal Age: none.
—Advanced Paternal Age: severe risk for poor genetics of child.
As many know, there are optimal ages to conceive and birth children; optimal for both the health of the mother during pregnancy and labour, and the quality of the child's health/ genetics.
Most people unfortunately only focus on a single age factor: advanced age of the mother.
However, the advanced age of the father, as well as the premature age of both the mother and father, also have a huge impact.
In summary, the optimal fertility window is 18-35 years old, with the golden years between 20-24 years old, for both males and females.
Below are some studies listing the major risks associated with having children outside this window. It should be noted that this is only increased risks, not a guarantee it will actually occur to you.
Being smart, healthy and attentive can overcome odds.
Adolescent pregnancy (12-17) has increased risks of: ¹
—preterm births, foetal growth restriction, low birth-weight, episiotomy, uterine revision, low APGAR score (poor birth health), cephalopelvic disproportion, chronic/ gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage, anaemia, cervical laceration, low urinary tract infection, humeral dystocic presentations (shoulders stuck), stillbirth, neonatal death and death (mother).
Advanced maternal age pregnancy (35+) has increased risks of: ¹ ²
—infertility, preterm births,, chromosomal issues (genetic disorders, down-syndrome, etc), emergency caesarean, intrauterine growth restriction, low birth-weight, congenital anomaly, gestational diabetes mellitus, low APGAR score (poor birth health), placental abruption, chronic/ gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage, placenta praevia, vasa praevia, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, abnormality of fetal presentation, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, stillbirth, neonatal death and death (mother).
Adolescent siring (12-17) has no increased risks:
—can't find any studies that suggest there is any risks associated with very young aged fathers, as there is no genetic risks and fathers don't carry the child; so risks from an undeveloped body aren't applicable. Very young aged mothers have no genetic risks either, but carry significant risks to their health and the child's health (even into adulthood) due to an undeveloped body.
Advanced paternal age siring (35+) has increased risks of: ¹
—infertility, schizophrenia, sperm DNA damage, high rate of mutations (causes a plethora of defects (basically everything here is caused by this)), accumulated chromosomal aberrations, preterm births, low birth-weight, low APGAR score (poor birth health), birth defects, increased cancer risk in offspring (breast, prostate, nervous system, etc), congenital heart defects, retinoblastoma, autosomal dominant diseases, achondroplasia, childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, cleft lip, cleft palate, stillbirth snd neonatal death.
Summarize:
—Adolescent Maternal Age: risk for poor health of mother and child.
—Advanced Maternal Age: risk for poor health of mother and child; risk for poor genetics of child.
—Adolescent Paternal Age: none.
—Advanced Paternal Age: severe risk for poor genetics of child.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Mary's Age:
Her age is inconsequential, but I will discuss it, as it's often brought up and used as an excuse on why "child brides are okay" (this is biologically bad).
Mary's pregnancy was unusual in that it involved no intercourse and she conceived through the Holy Spirit [Lu 1:34-35], a bodiless entity, and maintained her virginity until after Jesus was born [Mw 1:25]. Mary's innocent pregnancy cannot be compared to a "child bride" regardless of her age, thus her age is inconsequential.
Predicting her age anyway, it was common in the local culture to be married early-mid teens, and many place her age here based on that; but that doesn't actually confirm her age.
When Gabriel told Mary that Elizabeth was pregnant, she made the decision to travel there alone (3-4 day walk, 70mi) and to spend 3 months with her [Lu 1:26-45]. In the local culture, no minor would have been allowed to do so; this tells us Mary conceived in her late teens to early 20's. Delayed marriage may be due to their prestigious lineages.
Her age is inconsequential, but I will discuss it, as it's often brought up and used as an excuse on why "child brides are okay" (this is biologically bad).
Mary's pregnancy was unusual in that it involved no intercourse and she conceived through the Holy Spirit [Lu 1:34-35], a bodiless entity, and maintained her virginity until after Jesus was born [Mw 1:25]. Mary's innocent pregnancy cannot be compared to a "child bride" regardless of her age, thus her age is inconsequential.
Predicting her age anyway, it was common in the local culture to be married early-mid teens, and many place her age here based on that; but that doesn't actually confirm her age.
When Gabriel told Mary that Elizabeth was pregnant, she made the decision to travel there alone (3-4 day walk, 70mi) and to spend 3 months with her [Lu 1:26-45]. In the local culture, no minor would have been allowed to do so; this tells us Mary conceived in her late teens to early 20's. Delayed marriage may be due to their prestigious lineages.
Forwarded from White America
Anti-literacy in the United States
Beginning around the mid 1700’s, The United States began passing Anti Literacy Laws, and is the only country to ever do so. These laws, being an extension of the slave code system, prevented colored slaves and coloreds in general from being taught to read and write.
The main concerns which brought about these laws were to prevent:
-slaves from forging documents to escape to a free state
-slave insurrections
-the elevation of blacks to a level of Whites intellectually
-disrupting the equilibrium of White America
Significant anti-literacy laws include:
• 1829, Georgia: Prohibited teaching blacks to read, punished by fine and imprisonment
• 1830, Louisiana, North Carolina: passes law punishing anyone teaching blacks to read with fines, imprisonment or floggings
• 1832, Alabama and Virginia: Prohibited Whites from teaching blacks to read or write, punished by fines and floggings
• 1833, Georgia: Prohibited blacks from working in reading or writing jobs (via an employment law), and prohibited teaching blacks, punished by fines and whippings
• 1847, Missouri: Prohibited assembling or teaching slaves to read or write
• 1849, Virginia: Every assemblage of negroes for the purpose of instruction in reading or writing, or in the night time for any purpose, shall be an unlawful assembly. Any justice may issue his warrant to any office or other person, requiring him to enter any place where such assemblage may be, and seize any negro therein; and he, or any other justice, may order such negro to be punished with stripes
Many attempts have been made to build schools or programs to educate blacks, but were rightfully shut down or even destroyed. Such examples are:
-The Noyes Academy which was destroyed shortly after it was founded in New Hampshire, 1835. The building was “shattered, mutilated, inwardly beyond reparation almost”, and was later destroyed by arson.
-Canterbury Female Boarding School, founded in 1831 was a school dedicated to black girls only. The school was rightfully closed and shut down for good in 1834 after it was broken into, windows destroyed, and the students terrorized.
-Simeon Jocelyn introduced the plan of creating a Black college in New Haven in 1831. Jocelyn's project was met with overwhelming opposition, and the vote against it in New Haven was 700 to 4. He eventually resigned from his position as pastor of the African-American church, and his house was later attacked as an appropriate response.
Conclusion:
Early Americans understood the threat of educating the negroe within the states. Not because it posed a threat to their intelligence or superiority as commonly claimed, but threatened the equilibrium of a successful White America. Heeding their correct suspicions, they passed laws to prevent this threat and appropriately punished those who went against it. Notwithstanding their laws and reasoning behind it rapidly degraded our White America through humanitarian effort, only to leave it in shambles with little to no success in black literacy.
Sources:
"Illegal to Teach Slaves to Read and Write". Harper's Weekly. June 21, 1862
"Offences against public policy," Title 54, Chapter 198; "Assembling of negroes. Trading by free negroes," Section 31; in The Code of Virginia. Richmond: William F. Ritchie. 1849. p. 747
Wikipedia: Anti-literacy laws in the United States
84 percent of Black students lack proficiency in mathematics and 85 percent of Black students lack proficiency in reading skills.
Beginning around the mid 1700’s, The United States began passing Anti Literacy Laws, and is the only country to ever do so. These laws, being an extension of the slave code system, prevented colored slaves and coloreds in general from being taught to read and write.
The main concerns which brought about these laws were to prevent:
-slaves from forging documents to escape to a free state
-slave insurrections
-the elevation of blacks to a level of Whites intellectually
-disrupting the equilibrium of White America
Significant anti-literacy laws include:
• 1829, Georgia: Prohibited teaching blacks to read, punished by fine and imprisonment
• 1830, Louisiana, North Carolina: passes law punishing anyone teaching blacks to read with fines, imprisonment or floggings
• 1832, Alabama and Virginia: Prohibited Whites from teaching blacks to read or write, punished by fines and floggings
• 1833, Georgia: Prohibited blacks from working in reading or writing jobs (via an employment law), and prohibited teaching blacks, punished by fines and whippings
• 1847, Missouri: Prohibited assembling or teaching slaves to read or write
• 1849, Virginia: Every assemblage of negroes for the purpose of instruction in reading or writing, or in the night time for any purpose, shall be an unlawful assembly. Any justice may issue his warrant to any office or other person, requiring him to enter any place where such assemblage may be, and seize any negro therein; and he, or any other justice, may order such negro to be punished with stripes
Many attempts have been made to build schools or programs to educate blacks, but were rightfully shut down or even destroyed. Such examples are:
-The Noyes Academy which was destroyed shortly after it was founded in New Hampshire, 1835. The building was “shattered, mutilated, inwardly beyond reparation almost”, and was later destroyed by arson.
-Canterbury Female Boarding School, founded in 1831 was a school dedicated to black girls only. The school was rightfully closed and shut down for good in 1834 after it was broken into, windows destroyed, and the students terrorized.
-Simeon Jocelyn introduced the plan of creating a Black college in New Haven in 1831. Jocelyn's project was met with overwhelming opposition, and the vote against it in New Haven was 700 to 4. He eventually resigned from his position as pastor of the African-American church, and his house was later attacked as an appropriate response.
Conclusion:
Early Americans understood the threat of educating the negroe within the states. Not because it posed a threat to their intelligence or superiority as commonly claimed, but threatened the equilibrium of a successful White America. Heeding their correct suspicions, they passed laws to prevent this threat and appropriately punished those who went against it. Notwithstanding their laws and reasoning behind it rapidly degraded our White America through humanitarian effort, only to leave it in shambles with little to no success in black literacy.
Sources:
"Illegal to Teach Slaves to Read and Write". Harper's Weekly. June 21, 1862
"Offences against public policy," Title 54, Chapter 198; "Assembling of negroes. Trading by free negroes," Section 31; in The Code of Virginia. Richmond: William F. Ritchie. 1849. p. 747
Wikipedia: Anti-literacy laws in the United States
84 percent of Black students lack proficiency in mathematics and 85 percent of Black students lack proficiency in reading skills.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Old America is ironically the utopian society of every DR sperg that calls Old America a "satanic liberal jewish gay freemasonic protestant" state.
In Old America you could openly fedpost with your bros, smash windows of black schools, lynch nonwhite tolerant politicians in the streets and be applauded by the state.
t.iss.one/WhiteAmerica14/188
Whether you like it or not, all White nationalist movements have their origin in White Protestant America. White nationalism and advocacy is an American attribute.
In Old America you could openly fedpost with your bros, smash windows of black schools, lynch nonwhite tolerant politicians in the streets and be applauded by the state.
t.iss.one/WhiteAmerica14/188
Whether you like it or not, all White nationalist movements have their origin in White Protestant America. White nationalism and advocacy is an American attribute.
Telegram
White America
Anti-literacy in the United States
Beginning around the mid 1700’s, The United States began passing Anti Literacy Laws, and is the only country to ever do so. These laws, being an extension of the slave code system, prevented colored slaves and coloreds…
Beginning around the mid 1700’s, The United States began passing Anti Literacy Laws, and is the only country to ever do so. These laws, being an extension of the slave code system, prevented colored slaves and coloreds…
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
We are the good guys and every nonwhite is an agent of satan, in this struggle we face for the survival of our people.
Never forget that.
No matter how your views and life changes and evolves, never forget that this is the constant dynamic between us and them; as we, the Camp of the Saints, are surrounded by the dark armies of satan. Revelation 20:7-9.
Never forget that.
No matter how your views and life changes and evolves, never forget that this is the constant dynamic between us and them; as we, the Camp of the Saints, are surrounded by the dark armies of satan. Revelation 20:7-9.