Race First:
Race comes first in our natural world, while God transcends all paradigms and the natural world altogether; always being truly first.

Putting Christ First is the same as putting the White Race First, it's all the same and this false dichotomy needs to be put to rest.

Start putting Race First because it's not enough for this world to be Christian, it needs to be White too.

Fides Et Gens: Faith And Race, Inseparable.

If people want a larger infographic.

Why 1 Drop Is So Important:
Because it's only a few drops between us and ending up like ancient Egypt.
I prefer my White nationalism to be White.

MAINTAIN YOUR WHITE RACIAL PURITY.

Merry Christmas!
Today, over two thousand years ago, on the 25th day of December, on the first year of our Lord (Anno Domini), Jesus Christ was born, God incarnate; to save His people, the White race, from their sins and the dark Non racial hordes.

Today, we still celebrate the coming of our Lord on this day, coming together with family and friends, rejoicing in racial communion, for what God did for us; and maintaining our familial bonds in our quest for White racial preservation.

Enemies of our race continue in their attempt to distort this day, through commericalism or disassociation with Christianity, in their pursuit to destroy such a powerful occasion every year for the White race to come together.
    <Great source for the dating: dec25th.info>

Today, on the 25ᵀᴴ of December ᴬᴰ1, Christ was born, for the White race; and don't let anyone take that from us.

Opportunity And Adaptation:
We all get ever more crushingly blackpilled about the state of the world. The ever-increasing proportions of Nons (non-whites) in our countries, global decreasing fertility rates, unrelenting spread of homosexuality, abortion and birth control.
It's quite literally hell on earth.

Or... is it an opportunity for White success?

We spend so much time trying to fight against the ever-consuming system rather than seeing it as a potential tool for our own success.
In the past few decades the spread of feminism, homosexuality, abortion and birth control has had the most impact on the fertility rates of: South America, Africa, Middle East and Asia; not White fertility rates in: North America, Europe and Australia; which have unfortunately remained at similar low rates.

Recent Fertility Rate Reduction:
(replacement fertility = 2.11)
—East Asia: 6.3-1.6 (1963-2020)
-4.7 change.
—South America (Brazil): 6.1-1.6 (1960-2020)
-4.5 change.
—Middle East & North Africa: 7.1-2.7 (1962-2020)
-4.4 change.
—Sub Sahara Africa: 6.8-4.5 (1983-2020).
-2.3 change.
Note: half of this (-0.8) is just since 2010!
—North America: 3.7-1.6 (1960-2020)
-2.1 change.
—Australia: 3.5-1.6 (1961-2020)
-1.9 change.
—Europe (EU): 2.6-1.5 (1960-2020)
-1.1 change.

While it's unfortunate North America, Australia and Europe (Whites) dropped below replacement fertility rate, they weren't far off to begin with. The global dynamic has most severely affected the formerly extremely high fertility regions of East Asia, South America and Middle East, with the former 2 dropping well below replacement fertility rates, and the latter (MENA) predicted to go below 2.1 by 2030.

The only region in the world that will maintain an above replacement fertility rate is Sub Sahara Africa, but even they are predicted to drop below 2.1 within the next 50 years.

Having put this in perspective, why should we get in the way of the systems inevitable consumption of the Non world?
We should only be getting Whites out of it's way!

Adapt.
This presents us with an opportunity, as the entirety of the world is spiraling to zero fertility rate, it inevitably means all Nons will begin to rapidly decline around the world (not infinity niggers afterall!); however Whites are too declining, which should be the focus of our future goals.

Let the liberal world continue to export en masse: feminism, buttsex, abortion and birth control; to the Non world (in particular Africa) and have very large White families in spite of it.

While large White families among us would start out as an insignificant contribution to the global White fertility rate, it will rapidly increase over time.
It need not even overtake Non population, as with consistent above replacement White fertility rates, the White population will become younger as the Non population ages.
I'll get more into PWDS (Positive White Demographic Shift) in another post, essentially disproportionately higher White fertility rates.

Of course we as Christians find these evils (abortion, etc) repulsive but if our racial enemies desire it, it is our duty to step aside and let them have it. Our only concern should be ensuring as many Whites as possible don't participate.

Perhaps this gets in the way of the global agenda for population reduction, but we will continue to raise the White fertility rate, and they can take their excesses away from the Non world's fertility instead.

Inaction Is Suicide:
Re: Opportunity And Adaptation.

This discussion on global fertility rate trends and it's greater negative effect on Nons, is not the Whitepill many of you think it is.

While the fertility rate of all Non countries and their populations are beginning to rapidly decline; White nations are already there.
This is the caveat of the opportunity presented in front of us and why adaption is necessary. The premise is Whites need to have a fertility boom right now while the Nons are having an aggressive fertility bust.

Many of you would have looked at the previous post and thought "oh looks like things will work out on their own! guess I'll just bunker down and wait for it all to blow over!". It won't.
This opportunity can be missed.

If you're not raising White children, you're part of the problem, not the solution.
Inaction is racial suicide.

—Family Size.
Given replacement rate is approximately 2.11 children, a minimum of 3 White children is required of us all, but ideally more than 5.
Every additional child beyond the first 2 exponentially increases the growth. So if you have the capability for a larger family than 5, go for it and aim for 10.

—Health and Impurity.
It is unfortunate that many of us will be in a position of infertility, genetic defects or racial impurity; of which not only hinders our ability to have healthy White children, but perpetuates genetic pollution.
This however does not need to be the end for you, as many avenues are available to us today, such as: adoption, or donor gametes (sperm, egg). Both of which provide you the ability to intentionally choose higher quality offspring to raise as your own.
Of course this is not the ideal situation for any of us, but raising healthy White children as our own, is far better than having no children at all; and it is noble of us to not perpetuate our own genetic flaws.

—Education.
It isn't enough to simply have many White children, they must be well educated, both academically and in White racial loyalty. Ensuring they can obtain good employment, so they can raise a family of their own, and so they can work themselves into positions of influence and power, to help protect White families.
Because a day will come when having White children is falsely considered an act of genocide; hiding on a homestead innawoods isn't going to stop that.

There is no sitting this out and hiding away until "things get better", they are likely to only get worse, until enough of us put the work in.
Violence and illegal acts won't fix our issues, having White families will; it's time you started a family of your own.

Do your part and have a large family of healthy White children.

Stop Making Excuses:
If the poorest Non can afford to have many children, what makes you, a White man, think you can't do the same but better?

It should go without saying, that if you're socially or genetically dysgenic, then don't have kids.

We're not asking that you live in squalor to achieve this. You should be smart enough to work out how to have a reasonable standard of living with a large White family.

If you can't manage that, then you need to reflect on yourself and stop making excuses.

Underman:
The English term that untermensch originally derived from.
    —A person considered genetically, racially or socially inferior by innate qualities.
As opposed to Overman (übermensch), the inverse of Underman.

An issue that has been at the forefront of European discussion on demographics for centuries, is the issue of the Underman, commonly referred to as undesirables. Often fantasized in demonic ways with bizarre and inconsistent criteria.

They have however always been the following:
—persons with genetic defects.
—persons with poor physical traits.
—persons of mixed race/ tainted ancestry.
—persons of lower socioeconomic class.

Ultimately though, all 4 of these categories can be boiled down to the first one: defects in your genetic code.
—poor physical traits are produced by deficiencies in your genetic code.
—non-white ancestry can be seen as a genetic defect which causes undesirable traits, broken gene pairings, lowered intelligence and heightened aggression.
—poor socioeconomic performance is often a product of genetic code which makes you disadvantaged to your peers.
We shouldn't however forget the importance of superior culture, which we pass to our children.

While I disagree that poor socioeconomic performance equals genetic inferiority; our ancestors (who didn't understand genetics) simply understood that having children with a spouse in any of those 4 categories meant your children would likely be there also, and be disadvantaged.

Prior to industrialism, this was never an issue, as only those with clean ancestry/ genetics, had the means to successfully raise large families into adulthood (natural selection). This isn't a polemic against the industrial revolution, as it still remains the best thing to happen to the White race.

Industrialism was the product of superior men building amazing societies/ civilizations which provided excellent living standards to all, allowing the lower socioeconomic class to successfully raise large families into adulthood.

It would be inhumane, non-altruistic, non-European, to believe this was a bad thing; the issue came after when we all stopped caring. The Overman didn't care to have children, the Underman didn't care to limit their children; neither cared to select spouses on good qualities, and regressed to the mean. The result being intentionally few higher quality children, and unintentionally many lower quality children.

Europeans did come up with a solution to this issue however: family planning; i.e. birth control. On the surface this appears disastrous, the sharp decline in overall White fertility, however the fertility that does occur is significantly better quality. We're in a period of quality refinement, and if the superior White stock continue to have White children, we'll begin to grow again and surpass our current population in better quality than today.

We already see this occurring across the world (Opportunity And Adaptation), where only Whites who care about our race, are having White children, and those of quality are capable of successfully having large White families; whilst the fertility of the Non-white world is drastically grinding to a halt and shrinking.

Where's it going wrong?
Ethnic replacement (mass immigration), race-mixing and an aggressive cultural push for disinterest in having White children; particularly quality White children.

What am I supposed to take away from this?
While I push for you all to have large White families, we mustn't forget quality. I want us all to have large quality/ healthy White families.

The previous post gathered much criticism (Stop Making Excuses) for all the wrong reasons; the criticism should have been that I didn't explicitly express quality enough, but instead the protests were "it's all too hard!" or "it's impossible to find a decent White spouse!".

This is ultimately just natural selection at work, only those good enough genetically and culturally, will be able to court a quality White spouse and have large healthy White families; while the inferior are left to complain.

Esau and Edom:
It's all too easy for us all to simply label our enemies with the broad stroke of "Edomites" (Esau), but is this actually biblical?

We'll look at the history of Edom, and it's founder Esau, starting at Genesis 25-32:
—Esau and Jacob are twin brothers. Sons of Rebecca and Isaac, son of Abraham.
—Isaac loved Esau and wanted to give him the birthright.
—Jacob tricked Esau into giving him the birthright.
—Jacob tricked Isaac into giving him his blessing.
—Esau vowed to kill Jacob for his deceit.
—Esau betrayed his family also, marrying forbidden local Canaanites.
—Their descendants were still Adamic, demonstrated by their allowance to assimilate [Deu 23:7-8].
—Brothers meet again years later, Esau commands huge armies which Jacob feared for the lives of his people.
—Esau however did not attack, ran to Jacob and hugged him (Reconciliation of Jacob and Esau), despite everything, they were still brothers.
—Their descendants however continued to be extremely hostile to each other [Psa 137:7], the Edomites even aiding the sacking of Judah.
—"Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated" [Mal 1:2-3] is often falsely quoted to drive the narrative they were some demonic alien tribe, but when quoted by St Paul [Rom 9:13-14] it is abundantly clear this was loaded language to add emphasis, all it meant was "Jacob I chose, but Esau I rejected".
—Edom's destruction is prophesied [Oba 1] and would shortly occur, despite the continued use of the name against future unrelated rivals such as Judaeans against Rome, Rome against Muslims, England and France against each other, etc.

According to "The Religion of Idumea and Its Relationship to Early Judaism" (Levin, 2020) after the collapse of the Kingdom of Edom, they were ethnically replaced by Arabs who adopted an Edomite identity under the name "Idumaean".

Summary of the transition from Edom to Idumaea (Levin, 2020):
—Kingdom of Judah falls in 586ᴮᶜ.
—Kingdom of Edom covered either side of Arabah Valley and the Negev Desert.
—Edom abolished in 552ᴮᶜ by Neo-Babylonian King Nabunidus, eastern territory overrun by Qedarite and Nabatean Arabs (mixed).
—Arabs assist Persian King Cambyses conquer Egypt and Edom's western territory in 525ᴮᶜ, as reward, Edom's former territory and Gaza trade routes are granted to Qedarite Arabs [Herodotus Histories 3:4-9].
—Alexander the Great razed Gaza in 332ᴮᶜ, ending Qedarite rule of the region and trade routes, started by Cambyses.
—An administrative body known as Idumaea emerged (Greek name, inspired by new Greek influence), encompassing the regions southwest of the Dead Sea, with some reach in the southern Judaean hills, and Negev Desert.
—Hasmonean ruler John Hyrcanus I absorbs Idumaea into Judaea in 107ᴮᶜ (Antiquities 13:256-257; Wars 1:63).

Further analysis (Levin, 2020):
—The epigraphic record on Idumaean citizen name origin infers an Idumaean demographic that is: 30% Arab, 30% West Semitic, 25% Edomite, 10% Judahite, and rest Aramaic, Egyptian and Phoenician.
—In the north of Idumaea (Arad), the demographic is: 61% Judahite, 14% Edomite, 12% Arab.
—Strabo Geographica 16:2.34 claims Idumaeans were originally Nabatean Arabs.
—(Reich, 2011) Modern Jews attained their negro admixture 72 gens ago (~2200 years, 30/gen) while Druze attained this 44 gens ago (~1300 years, 30/gen).

In Summary: after the fall of Judah and Edom. Edom was erased as a nation and ethnically replaced by Arabs.

The surviving Edomites settled in a region that would later be known as Idumaea; however they quickly became a small minority even in that land, so much so that Greek historians (Strabo) would mistake the Arab majority as being the Edomites. Perhaps Hyrcanus mistook them as well when absorbing Idumaea.

Idumaea became an ethnically blurred melting pot of: Arab (mainly), Edomite, Judahite, and Phoenician; which would all identify as "Idumaean".

Modern Jews attained their negro admixture at this time (~200ᴮᶜ) which other Levantine peoples didn't attain until (~ᴬᴰ700) during the Arabic expansion, demonstrating Jews weren't Judahites nor Edomites, but mixed Qedarite Arabs.

Reconciliation of Jacob and Esau:
Edomites were not a non-white alien tribe, they were an ancient White tribe that rivalled the Judahites.

Genetic studies demonstrate Jews were neither Edomites nor Judahites, but racially mixed Qedarite Arabs who controlled Levantine trade routes out of Gaza, larped as Edomites in Idumaea for prominence, then larped as Judahites in Judaea for prominence, then larped as Whites in Western nations for prominence.

Our rivals aren't Edomites, they're Nons.

CFT: Edom In The Old And New Testaments.
—In our article, “Edom In The Old And New Testaments,” we prove conclusively that Esau and his Edomite progeny were unmixed Adamic people.

------
Great article on Esau-Edom by the Christians For Truth team.

Australia: Always Was, Always Will Be, The White Man's Land.

1 Samuel 30:14
—ꜱɪǫᴠɪᴅᴇᴍ ɴᴏꜱ ᴇʀᴠᴘɪᴍᴠꜱ ᴀᴅ ᴀᴠꜱᴛʀᴀʟɪꜱ!
—For we made an invasion on the south!
We invaded, you're welcome.

Invasion Day or Australia Day, whatever you call it, I'm still celebrating.

Happy belated Australia Day.

Ghost Beach:
An original tribute to California, my home. Once a shining beacon of White civilization, with high: fertility rates, living standards, NWE populace, etc; reduced to a depraved wasteland filled with Nons.

One day, we will take it all back.

Reality Check: They were all White and there's nothing you can do about it.

Is Christianity really to blame for the decline of the West?
Whites displayed an ethnic centric global hegemony until very recently, whilst a majority Christian practicing people. Their decline has coincided with a rapid decline in being practicing Christians.

If we look to Whites today who isolate themselves to only the influence of Christianity (Amish, Mennonites) we see the same dominating and colonising ethnic centric patterns as we once displayed: rapid demographic growth and global colonisation.

Amish/ Mennonites from a 1900 population of 5k in the US, now are over 2m (370k in US), in 86 different countries, maintaining their ethnic purity. This population doubles every 20 years and will very soon start becoming a major ethnic group in many of these countries; which is reminiscent of the old growth of early US observed by Franklin*, which we doubled every 20 years.

*Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, etc. —Benjamin Franklin, 1751.

Christianity isn't to blame.

Genetic Soul Purification—Discussion:
Many have posed the question quite often recently on whether individuals can be hypothetically purified and made truly Adamic again (body and soul).
—Let's discuss!

We previously explored this topic (Purification) which we acknowledged that yes you can be genetically purified to a point indistinguishable from someone with perfect ancestry, through natural processes such as genetic recombination, or artificial processes such as genetic engineering. However, according to the doctrine of Generationism¹ ², the purified individual would be soulless.

We hold to (and will continue to) the doctrine of Generationism (a soul is a product of two parental souls) in which you could never regain a soul, however many have protested that this doctrine is flawed, scripturally unsound and illogical. We would disagree with that, but discussion may help strengthen our case for Generationism.

So the discussion topics are:
—Can someone who has been genetically purified, regain a soul?
—Is Generationism scripturally sound?
—By what mechanism are souls inherited?

This is a hypothetical question of if it can technically occur, not if it should; it should never be policy.
In that previous post we expressed that it was not only infeasible and counterproductive, but simply dumb to believe "bleaching" would ever result in anything but Brazil.

-----------
Edit: it appears attempts to refute Generationism was unsuccessful.

Here's an excerpt from a previous post: "There is only one verse where a soul is directly created by God; Adam's creation [Genesis 2:7]. Not even Eve's soul was created, Eve was only and wholly created from the substance of Adam [Genesis 2:21-23], both her body and soul came from Adam. Between them, they propagate both souls and bodies of Adam; which is why it was important for them to be fruitful and multiply [Genesis 1:28]. Later it is mentioned that souls came from Jacob's loins [Genesis 46:26], supporting soul propagation."

West Eurasian, Ancient and Modern Continuity:
It's often claimed that the different major West Eurasian branches were vastly different peoples, equivalent to nearly different races -appearing as such when looking at a PCA plot of West Eurasians- and that modern Europeans are just a race mixed hodgepodge of them.

However if you zoom out on this West Eurasian PCA plot, you'll see how immensely far away they are to everything else and how close they are. The various branches are only assumed so different when compared to modern populations that are mixed with East Eurasians and Sub-Saharans.

The entire Ancient World and modern Europeans fall in the same tiny square on the grand map of Homo—Genus.
The ancient world was White.

Thank God We're White:
Whites alone are Adamic no matter how much Nons complain, and how lucky we are.

The Last White Canaanite:
Please read the image for a full overview.

A Lebanese man shared his DNA on TikTok recently, which went viral as it revealed he was 100% Lebanese (modern) and 75% Canaanite (ancient), but had a racially White phenotype, similar to Western Europe.
It's interesting that his Christian faith has preserved his racial purity for over 2000 years.

If his DNA analysis is accurate, this is a modern representation of what Canaanites may have looked like.

Note: This doesn't mean modern Lebanese are White, they aren't. This White individual is simply an anomaly.

Attack On Non Fertility:
Bill Gates, whether through malicious intent or misplaced benevolence, has objectively done more for the advancement of the White race than most of us will collectively do in our lifetimes.

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and others like it have put a significant effort into curbing fertility rates in the non-white world, specifically targeting regions such as EA, SA, MENA and recently SSA. This doesn't make these people good, they likely believe they're actually helping Nons, but they aren't.

What effect has this had on those regions? An aggressive reduction in very high fertility rates (figures).
—East Asia: -4.7 loss.
—South America: -4.5 loss.
—Middle East/ North Africa: -4.4 loss.
—Sub-Sahara Africa: -2.3 loss.
In that same period, Europe lost only -1.1 TFR.

The consequence of this? Each of those regions are set to half in population by 2100 (except SSA, which will start declining 2080).

The hot take? Have a large White family and let globohomo consume the nonwhite world.