Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Cuius Regio, Eius Religio.
Whose realm, his religion.
Many don't understand that American "Freedom of Religion" was the ideal improvement to the former European "Cuius regio, eius religio" which had forced the common White man to believe whatever religion his local ruler believed, regardless of his personal thoughts.
This caused immense European division and dissent; if America wanted to emerge and continue as a powerful unified state, this had to change. American principles also wanted to maintain individual liberty, which cannot occur with forced religion and persecuted intellectual freedom.
America was founded as a Protestant nation, with an expectation to be Protestant, and freedom to whatever belief you had; as long as you met three precedents:
—Protestant-Christian morality.
—White racial loyalty.
—Loyalty to the nation-state (America).
This effectively birthed White Nationalism as we know today.
Like them, I believe in full Freedom of Religion, but I expect you to be Protestant, or be seen as odd.
Whose realm, his religion.
Many don't understand that American "Freedom of Religion" was the ideal improvement to the former European "Cuius regio, eius religio" which had forced the common White man to believe whatever religion his local ruler believed, regardless of his personal thoughts.
This caused immense European division and dissent; if America wanted to emerge and continue as a powerful unified state, this had to change. American principles also wanted to maintain individual liberty, which cannot occur with forced religion and persecuted intellectual freedom.
America was founded as a Protestant nation, with an expectation to be Protestant, and freedom to whatever belief you had; as long as you met three precedents:
—Protestant-Christian morality.
—White racial loyalty.
—Loyalty to the nation-state (America).
This effectively birthed White Nationalism as we know today.
Like them, I believe in full Freedom of Religion, but I expect you to be Protestant, or be seen as odd.
👍1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
20221022 nof.png
685.5 KB
National Origins Formula: United States (1921-1965).
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Freedom of Peopling:
The United States always had a policy for freedom of peopling, where not just one ethnic group could populate the nation (usually restricted to founding population) and allowed immigration into the nation (usually barred, or of founding populations homeland, only) also not of just one ethnic group.
However this was never unlimited, from the very founding of the nation, with the Naturalization Act of 1790, citizenship was restricted to "free White persons of good character", only; which is quite a large freedom of peopling when you consider the very numerous White ethnic groups, widely diverse: genetically, culturally and linguistically.
Political issues and mistakes occured over the history of the United States (through trickery and deceit) which allowed Non citizenship, however immigration would still remain almost exclusive to Whites (Europeans).
This would come not to be seen as enough by Americans, which would birth the National Origins Formula in the early 20th century, driven by the huge influx of Southern and Eastern European immigration; which was enacted by an "emergency quota act" to halt this immigration.
This capped total immigration to 2-3% of the US population and capped immigration of specific ethnic groups to 2-3% of their current domestic population
The most drastic immigration change from this was a reduction of Southern and Eastern Europeans from 43% of all immigrants yearly, to 14%, just a few years later.
This formula did two things: protected native population from displacement, and forced an 80% immigration preference to Northwestern Europeans.
It protected native population as with the maximum cap, foreigners (immigrants) would never be able to constitute a significant portion of the nation.
Why would they intentionally restrict Southern and Eastern European immigration?
American Exceptionalism and self preservation. The National Origins Formula was put into place to protect the ethnic composition of the United States, which was supermajority Northwestern European; and because Northwestern Europeans were seen as objectively superior due to the global and technological feats they achieved, particularly in America; both of which they wanted to protect.
This isn't a statement against Southern and Eastern Europeans, there is nothing wrong with their immigration and mixing into other European nations; and Americans didn't believe it was an issue either.
They simply to wanted to moderate their immigration to maintain an effectively Northwestern European nation.
Australia, during their White Australia Policy, did the same thing, just more severe: restricting as much as 75% of all immigration to from the United Kingdom.
In summary, America's Freedom of Peopling was to Northwestern Europeans, with minority allowances for all other Europeans.
The United States always had a policy for freedom of peopling, where not just one ethnic group could populate the nation (usually restricted to founding population) and allowed immigration into the nation (usually barred, or of founding populations homeland, only) also not of just one ethnic group.
However this was never unlimited, from the very founding of the nation, with the Naturalization Act of 1790, citizenship was restricted to "free White persons of good character", only; which is quite a large freedom of peopling when you consider the very numerous White ethnic groups, widely diverse: genetically, culturally and linguistically.
Political issues and mistakes occured over the history of the United States (through trickery and deceit) which allowed Non citizenship, however immigration would still remain almost exclusive to Whites (Europeans).
This would come not to be seen as enough by Americans, which would birth the National Origins Formula in the early 20th century, driven by the huge influx of Southern and Eastern European immigration; which was enacted by an "emergency quota act" to halt this immigration.
This capped total immigration to 2-3% of the US population and capped immigration of specific ethnic groups to 2-3% of their current domestic population
The most drastic immigration change from this was a reduction of Southern and Eastern Europeans from 43% of all immigrants yearly, to 14%, just a few years later.
This formula did two things: protected native population from displacement, and forced an 80% immigration preference to Northwestern Europeans.
It protected native population as with the maximum cap, foreigners (immigrants) would never be able to constitute a significant portion of the nation.
Why would they intentionally restrict Southern and Eastern European immigration?
American Exceptionalism and self preservation. The National Origins Formula was put into place to protect the ethnic composition of the United States, which was supermajority Northwestern European; and because Northwestern Europeans were seen as objectively superior due to the global and technological feats they achieved, particularly in America; both of which they wanted to protect.
This isn't a statement against Southern and Eastern Europeans, there is nothing wrong with their immigration and mixing into other European nations; and Americans didn't believe it was an issue either.
They simply to wanted to moderate their immigration to maintain an effectively Northwestern European nation.
Australia, during their White Australia Policy, did the same thing, just more severe: restricting as much as 75% of all immigration to from the United Kingdom.
In summary, America's Freedom of Peopling was to Northwestern Europeans, with minority allowances for all other Europeans.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
20221025 wog.png
647.3 KB
Don't Call Yourself a Wog:
Research (link to post).
—in defence of Southern Europeans.
The word "wog" is a slang abbreviation of the word "golliwogg", identical to the very modern abbreviation "non" of the word "non-white", all of which ironically simply mean non-white.
Wogs are non-white.
Only Whites can be Southern European.
Southern Europeans are White and cannot be wogs.
Don’t call yourself a wog, it’s a non-white slur.
Research (link to post).
—in defence of Southern Europeans.
The word "wog" is a slang abbreviation of the word "golliwogg", identical to the very modern abbreviation "non" of the word "non-white", all of which ironically simply mean non-white.
Wogs are non-white.
Only Whites can be Southern European.
Southern Europeans are White and cannot be wogs.
Don’t call yourself a wog, it’s a non-white slur.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Don't Call Yourself a Wog:
—in defence of Southern Europeans.
In very recent times, the word "Wog" has been made synonymous with "Southern Europeans" despite never in it's history being used to refer to them, it has always been a term that explicitly meant "non-white", including in the country who iconically use it: Australia. The association with Southern Europeans is both a recent misconception and intentional media revision.
The word "wog" is a slang abbreviation of the word "golliwogg", identical to the very modern abbreviation "non" of the word "non-white", all of which ironically simply mean non-white.
To summarize: (exhaustive timeline here)
– In 1894 the term “golliwogg” is invented to describe a negro fictional character.
– By 1912 golliwog becomes a popular slang term for non-whites.
– By 1929 it is abbreviated to “wog” and becomes a common British naval slang term for non-whites.
– Between 1945 and 1980 up to 1 million Southern Europeans and North Africans migrate to Australia, including (approximately 15k Chileans, 30k Turkish Cypriots, 30k Egyptians, 35k Indians, 50k Lebanese, and 30k Turks*) all under the guise of “Southern European.” During this time the term wog is popularized in Australia.
– 1981 the first entry into an Australian dictionary for the term “wog” is made, which is explicitly defined as any dark skinned individual (non-whites), “especially Arabs” with no mention of Southern Europeans.
The conclusion here is that the term has always consistently meant “non-white” across the entire Anglo world, including Australia. This being the proper Oxford definition today “wog: a person who is non-white”.
Australians may not have considered Meds (Southern Europeans) White, or simply wished to insult their non-Anglo complexion and ancestry, which is why they used derogative terms against them and called them wogs (literally non-white).
Regardless of if they were right or not to call them that, or to think of Meds that way; the term genuinely meant non-white and was used in Australia to mean non-white. Trying to "reclaim" the word wog for certain Whites, is identical to trying to reclaim the word negro for certain Whites, it is an oxymoron.
There is also the possibility the term wog was thrown around due to over 200k non-white North Africans and Middle Easterners migrating to Australia under the false guise of “Southern European”, giving a false image of Southern Europeans while the real Southern Europeans simply blended in with the other millions of European immigrants. In any case, a misconception was born and the Australian government along with the media intentionally blurred the lines between Southern European and wog, to confuse the common people; this misconception never occurred in England and wog remains a term for non-white among the common people.
As a last note, be wary of those who self-identify as "wog"; as within Australia, the supermajority of persons self-identifying as wog, are of North African and Middle Eastern descent, especially Turkish and Lebanese.
Wogs are non-white.
Only Whites can be Southern European.
Southern Europeans are White and cannot be wogs.
Don’t call yourself a wog, it’s a non-white slur.
—in defence of Southern Europeans.
In very recent times, the word "Wog" has been made synonymous with "Southern Europeans" despite never in it's history being used to refer to them, it has always been a term that explicitly meant "non-white", including in the country who iconically use it: Australia. The association with Southern Europeans is both a recent misconception and intentional media revision.
The word "wog" is a slang abbreviation of the word "golliwogg", identical to the very modern abbreviation "non" of the word "non-white", all of which ironically simply mean non-white.
To summarize: (exhaustive timeline here)
– In 1894 the term “golliwogg” is invented to describe a negro fictional character.
– By 1912 golliwog becomes a popular slang term for non-whites.
– By 1929 it is abbreviated to “wog” and becomes a common British naval slang term for non-whites.
– Between 1945 and 1980 up to 1 million Southern Europeans and North Africans migrate to Australia, including (approximately 15k Chileans, 30k Turkish Cypriots, 30k Egyptians, 35k Indians, 50k Lebanese, and 30k Turks*) all under the guise of “Southern European.” During this time the term wog is popularized in Australia.
– 1981 the first entry into an Australian dictionary for the term “wog” is made, which is explicitly defined as any dark skinned individual (non-whites), “especially Arabs” with no mention of Southern Europeans.
The conclusion here is that the term has always consistently meant “non-white” across the entire Anglo world, including Australia. This being the proper Oxford definition today “wog: a person who is non-white”.
Australians may not have considered Meds (Southern Europeans) White, or simply wished to insult their non-Anglo complexion and ancestry, which is why they used derogative terms against them and called them wogs (literally non-white).
Regardless of if they were right or not to call them that, or to think of Meds that way; the term genuinely meant non-white and was used in Australia to mean non-white. Trying to "reclaim" the word wog for certain Whites, is identical to trying to reclaim the word negro for certain Whites, it is an oxymoron.
There is also the possibility the term wog was thrown around due to over 200k non-white North Africans and Middle Easterners migrating to Australia under the false guise of “Southern European”, giving a false image of Southern Europeans while the real Southern Europeans simply blended in with the other millions of European immigrants. In any case, a misconception was born and the Australian government along with the media intentionally blurred the lines between Southern European and wog, to confuse the common people; this misconception never occurred in England and wog remains a term for non-white among the common people.
As a last note, be wary of those who self-identify as "wog"; as within Australia, the supermajority of persons self-identifying as wog, are of North African and Middle Eastern descent, especially Turkish and Lebanese.
Wogs are non-white.
Only Whites can be Southern European.
Southern Europeans are White and cannot be wogs.
Don’t call yourself a wog, it’s a non-white slur.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Updates:
Don't Call Yourself a Wog
- Please read additional clarifications at the end, added to image.
The World's Racial Perspective
- Cleaned up image and added the additional clarifications that were posted after, to main image.
White Ethnogenesis
- Updated infographic, adding higher resolution and cleaned up. Still have more additions in the works, such as civilizational milestones, to add.
Don't Call Yourself a Wog
- Please read additional clarifications at the end, added to image.
The World's Racial Perspective
- Cleaned up image and added the additional clarifications that were posted after, to main image.
White Ethnogenesis
- Updated infographic, adding higher resolution and cleaned up. Still have more additions in the works, such as civilizational milestones, to add.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans for you to prosper, plans to give you hope and a future." —Jeremiah 29:11
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Nordicism:
Why deny what we all know as true?
Previously I've discussed and provided the plausibility that the ancient Archaic Caucasian tribes known as West Siberian Hunter Gatherers (WSHG), Natufian Hunter Gatherers (NHG) and Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), were not only White, but free of foreign racial admixture (those of them that provided ancestry to modern Europeans).
The former two are a topic of contention as it is commonly questioned whether those with significant ancestry from them are considered White or not. While most of Europe has a little ancestry from both, NHG is only significant in ancestry in Southern Europe, and WSHG is only significant in Eastern Europe.
This questioned whether they can be considered White for such ancestry, I believe they can be considered White even if entirely comprised of either group today (assuming no non West Eurasian admixture).
Should we want it?
However acknowledging they were White doesn't mean it's desirable nor ideal to have significant ancestry from them, the prior point was simply that such ancestry doesn't rule you out as White, but it's still ideal to reduce that ancestry among Europeans; given the prominence of NHG and WSHG ancestry among Southern and Eastern Europe, this effectively means that Europe, and Whites generally, should be predominantly Northwestern European.
Why reduce it?
Not meant as disparaging, but bluntly put, NHG and WSHG are notably inferior to the other major West Eurasian groups.
We see this in the reduction of quality, advancement and prominence, of the Southern European nations of antiquity. Once the global epicentre of high culture, now reduced to mediocre; still better than all Nons of the world, but never back to their previous heights.
What changed? The rapid influx of NHG ancestry across Southern Europe, still White, just reduced in superiority; prior to which the ancestry of Southern Europe was chiefly WHG, EEF, CHG, and a-like. Eastern Europe had similar issues regarding WSHG influx.
NHG and WSHG were great and had amazing feats of their own, but it doesn't measure up to what we see in NWE's.
We also see this in the unprecedented achievement of Northwestern Europeans (NWE):
"The world-wide expansion of the white race [NWE] ... between 1500 and 1900 is the most prodigious phenomenon in all recorded history ... white men [NWE] racially occupy four-tenths of the entire habitable land-area of the globe, while nearly nine-tenths of this area is under white [NWE] political control. Such a situation is unprecedented. Never before has a race acquired such combined preponderance of numbers and dominion."
—The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy. Lothrop Stoddard (1920).
"Whether measured in people or events, 97 percent of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occured in Europe and North America ... A study by MITI - Japan's equivalent of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) - concluded that 54% of the world's most important inventions were British. Of the rest, 25% were American."
—Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. Charles A. Murray (2003).
Should we oppose Northwestern Europeans mixing with Southern/ Eastern Europeans?
No, there's absolutely nothing wrong with it, both are White, and their children will be also, but we should be mindful to be eugenic and encourage larger healthy NWE families and ensure all nations are predominantly comprised of individuals with predominantly NWE ancestry.
Untermensch.
There will always be NWE who are as well, inferior, even disabled, which should also be reduced to protect the greater White genepool, with respect to the lesser individual.
One in Christ.
In theological views of Soteriology, all Whites are equal in the eyes of Christ and do not differ in their ability for Salvation.
However while we are equal in Christ (spiritually) we are inequal in genetics (physically), we're on equal standing in regards to Christ, but unequal standing in regards to the quality of our genetics, and culture.
Why deny what we all know as true?
Previously I've discussed and provided the plausibility that the ancient Archaic Caucasian tribes known as West Siberian Hunter Gatherers (WSHG), Natufian Hunter Gatherers (NHG) and Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), were not only White, but free of foreign racial admixture (those of them that provided ancestry to modern Europeans).
The former two are a topic of contention as it is commonly questioned whether those with significant ancestry from them are considered White or not. While most of Europe has a little ancestry from both, NHG is only significant in ancestry in Southern Europe, and WSHG is only significant in Eastern Europe.
This questioned whether they can be considered White for such ancestry, I believe they can be considered White even if entirely comprised of either group today (assuming no non West Eurasian admixture).
Should we want it?
However acknowledging they were White doesn't mean it's desirable nor ideal to have significant ancestry from them, the prior point was simply that such ancestry doesn't rule you out as White, but it's still ideal to reduce that ancestry among Europeans; given the prominence of NHG and WSHG ancestry among Southern and Eastern Europe, this effectively means that Europe, and Whites generally, should be predominantly Northwestern European.
Why reduce it?
Not meant as disparaging, but bluntly put, NHG and WSHG are notably inferior to the other major West Eurasian groups.
We see this in the reduction of quality, advancement and prominence, of the Southern European nations of antiquity. Once the global epicentre of high culture, now reduced to mediocre; still better than all Nons of the world, but never back to their previous heights.
What changed? The rapid influx of NHG ancestry across Southern Europe, still White, just reduced in superiority; prior to which the ancestry of Southern Europe was chiefly WHG, EEF, CHG, and a-like. Eastern Europe had similar issues regarding WSHG influx.
NHG and WSHG were great and had amazing feats of their own, but it doesn't measure up to what we see in NWE's.
We also see this in the unprecedented achievement of Northwestern Europeans (NWE):
"The world-wide expansion of the white race [NWE] ... between 1500 and 1900 is the most prodigious phenomenon in all recorded history ... white men [NWE] racially occupy four-tenths of the entire habitable land-area of the globe, while nearly nine-tenths of this area is under white [NWE] political control. Such a situation is unprecedented. Never before has a race acquired such combined preponderance of numbers and dominion."
—The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy. Lothrop Stoddard (1920).
"Whether measured in people or events, 97 percent of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occured in Europe and North America ... A study by MITI - Japan's equivalent of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) - concluded that 54% of the world's most important inventions were British. Of the rest, 25% were American."
—Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. Charles A. Murray (2003).
Should we oppose Northwestern Europeans mixing with Southern/ Eastern Europeans?
No, there's absolutely nothing wrong with it, both are White, and their children will be also, but we should be mindful to be eugenic and encourage larger healthy NWE families and ensure all nations are predominantly comprised of individuals with predominantly NWE ancestry.
Untermensch.
There will always be NWE who are as well, inferior, even disabled, which should also be reduced to protect the greater White genepool, with respect to the lesser individual.
One in Christ.
In theological views of Soteriology, all Whites are equal in the eyes of Christ and do not differ in their ability for Salvation.
However while we are equal in Christ (spiritually) we are inequal in genetics (physically), we're on equal standing in regards to Christ, but unequal standing in regards to the quality of our genetics, and culture.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Lingua Franca:
Literally translated "language of the Franks" is a term for "common language", which designated any language used by many peoples who primarily spoke different languages, to bridge their communication; specifically among Western Europeans, as the term "Frank" came to mean Western European.
Historically the most prominent lingua francas were Greek (West Asia) and Latin (Europe and Mediterranean).
The lingua franca today is English, across all of Europe and their diaspora.
Yet I see many try to encourage "all the based and redpilled people" to learn and speak languages among themselves (as a lingua franca) they believe is aesthetic, such as Icelandic, German, etc, which serves no utility and is a waste of time.
The purpose of common languages is that they're common, not a secret language among a small group, which makes them out to be larping pariahs.
Of 450m Europeans (EU), 370m speak English, if you add the Anglosphere, you get an additional 470m English speakers. English is by far the most dominant language among Whites with no close seconds, you don't need to reinvent the wheel.
Just speak English.
The value of English goes beyond it's prominence among Whites, it's a highly advanced, developed and articulate language.
— It uses the 26 character Anglo-Latin script, a dual case variation of the Latin script; highly familiar, which uses an advanced phonetic based alphabet with advanced low stroke characters.
"26 letters and about 8 commonly used forms of punctuation accomplish what other languages need thousands of symbols for."
— Highly articulate thanks to it's West Germanic base language, grammatically influenced by Old Norse, vocabularily influenced by Old Norse, Norman, French, Latin and Ancient Greek; giving it an enormous vocabulary.
— Is the international language of academia, business, commerce, science, medicine, politics, diplomacy and many other key areas. Even in the world of computing: most coding and the programming languages themselves, that power even other languages behind the scenes, is written in English.
— Morphologically is intelligent and not complicated. Most verbs have only 3 forms, no gendered nouns/ adjectives and no second person pronouns. Articles are simplistic and straightforward, i.e. "the" vs German "der, die, das, den, dem, des".
I advocate for all Whites to be highly fluent in English. There's truly no upgrade.
However I also encourage multilingualism:
— Latin: all Whites should learn Latin, as it still holds a highly important place in the legal, medical, and scientific fields the world over. It allows one to read over 2 millennia of scientific and literary classics from across Europe, being the language of Western Civilization. It also allows one to read the bible in (my opinion) the grandest biblical textual-basis, ensuring proper understanding, as the benefit of dead languages is that definitions don't evolve.
— Liturgical language should however remain vernacular (your own language) [1 Corinthians 14:19].
— Regional Language: It's encouraged (but ultimately not necessary) for all Whites to be highly fluent in their regional language: i.e. Afrikaans in South Africa, French in France, Swedish in Sweden, etc.
As a final note, this isn't to discourage the learning and use of others languages. I highly recommend those interested to pursue other languages, for recreational, educational or even intrinsic value; but never for primary usage, as we shouldn't pretend other languages are necessary; reserve English for that place, as it will greatly benefit ourselves and our people.
An example of a language with great intrinsic value is German, with the countless grand works of the past half millennia, in fields of theology, philosophy, economics and many others; but even German doesn't compare to English and Latin.
In summary, all Whites should be fluent in English and well studied in Latin.
Literally translated "language of the Franks" is a term for "common language", which designated any language used by many peoples who primarily spoke different languages, to bridge their communication; specifically among Western Europeans, as the term "Frank" came to mean Western European.
Historically the most prominent lingua francas were Greek (West Asia) and Latin (Europe and Mediterranean).
The lingua franca today is English, across all of Europe and their diaspora.
Yet I see many try to encourage "all the based and redpilled people" to learn and speak languages among themselves (as a lingua franca) they believe is aesthetic, such as Icelandic, German, etc, which serves no utility and is a waste of time.
The purpose of common languages is that they're common, not a secret language among a small group, which makes them out to be larping pariahs.
Of 450m Europeans (EU), 370m speak English, if you add the Anglosphere, you get an additional 470m English speakers. English is by far the most dominant language among Whites with no close seconds, you don't need to reinvent the wheel.
Just speak English.
The value of English goes beyond it's prominence among Whites, it's a highly advanced, developed and articulate language.
— It uses the 26 character Anglo-Latin script, a dual case variation of the Latin script; highly familiar, which uses an advanced phonetic based alphabet with advanced low stroke characters.
"26 letters and about 8 commonly used forms of punctuation accomplish what other languages need thousands of symbols for."
— Highly articulate thanks to it's West Germanic base language, grammatically influenced by Old Norse, vocabularily influenced by Old Norse, Norman, French, Latin and Ancient Greek; giving it an enormous vocabulary.
— Is the international language of academia, business, commerce, science, medicine, politics, diplomacy and many other key areas. Even in the world of computing: most coding and the programming languages themselves, that power even other languages behind the scenes, is written in English.
— Morphologically is intelligent and not complicated. Most verbs have only 3 forms, no gendered nouns/ adjectives and no second person pronouns. Articles are simplistic and straightforward, i.e. "the" vs German "der, die, das, den, dem, des".
I advocate for all Whites to be highly fluent in English. There's truly no upgrade.
However I also encourage multilingualism:
— Latin: all Whites should learn Latin, as it still holds a highly important place in the legal, medical, and scientific fields the world over. It allows one to read over 2 millennia of scientific and literary classics from across Europe, being the language of Western Civilization. It also allows one to read the bible in (my opinion) the grandest biblical textual-basis, ensuring proper understanding, as the benefit of dead languages is that definitions don't evolve.
— Liturgical language should however remain vernacular (your own language) [1 Corinthians 14:19].
— Regional Language: It's encouraged (but ultimately not necessary) for all Whites to be highly fluent in their regional language: i.e. Afrikaans in South Africa, French in France, Swedish in Sweden, etc.
As a final note, this isn't to discourage the learning and use of others languages. I highly recommend those interested to pursue other languages, for recreational, educational or even intrinsic value; but never for primary usage, as we shouldn't pretend other languages are necessary; reserve English for that place, as it will greatly benefit ourselves and our people.
An example of a language with great intrinsic value is German, with the countless grand works of the past half millennia, in fields of theology, philosophy, economics and many others; but even German doesn't compare to English and Latin.
In summary, all Whites should be fluent in English and well studied in Latin.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
The Founders of Ethiopia Were White:
Their civilization exists today only as ruins among primitive squalor.
On those shores washed by the Libyan Sea... are found the Libyan Aegyptians, the White Aethiopians*...
Pomponius Mela, Chorographia 2:1.23
If we pass through the interior of Africa in a southerly direction, beyond the Gætuli, after having traversed the intervening deserts, we shall find, first of all the Liby-Egyptians, and then the country where the Leucæthiopians* dwell... the Æthiopians are divided into two races... the Troglodytæ make excavations in the earth... for dwellings... serpents is their food; they have no articulate voice, but only utter a kind of squeaking noise...
Pliny the Elder, Natural History 5:8
Those who dwell along the river, are black in colour and have flat noses and woolly hair... they are entirely savage and display the nature of a wild beast... speaking as they do with a shrill voice...
Library of History 3:8.1-3
*Leucæthiopians translates to White Ethiopians.
Their civilization exists today only as ruins among primitive squalor.
On those shores washed by the Libyan Sea... are found the Libyan Aegyptians, the White Aethiopians*...
Pomponius Mela, Chorographia 2:1.23
If we pass through the interior of Africa in a southerly direction, beyond the Gætuli, after having traversed the intervening deserts, we shall find, first of all the Liby-Egyptians, and then the country where the Leucæthiopians* dwell... the Æthiopians are divided into two races... the Troglodytæ make excavations in the earth... for dwellings... serpents is their food; they have no articulate voice, but only utter a kind of squeaking noise...
Pliny the Elder, Natural History 5:8
Those who dwell along the river, are black in colour and have flat noses and woolly hair... they are entirely savage and display the nature of a wild beast... speaking as they do with a shrill voice...
Library of History 3:8.1-3
*Leucæthiopians translates to White Ethiopians.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
If we pass through the interior of Africa in a southerly direction, ... after having traversed the intervening deserts, we shall find, first of all the LibyEgyptians, and then the country where the Leucæthiopians dwell. ... After passing all these peoples, there are vast deserts towards the east until we come to the Garamantes, the Augylæ, and the Troglodytæ ... then the Ægipani, half men, half beasts, ... the form of the Ægipani is such as is commonly represented in paintings.
Pliny the Elder, The Natural History 5:8
Later writers such as Pliny the Elder used the terms "Aegipanes", "Aegipans", or "Oegipans" to describe a race of satyr-like wild men said to reside in Libya. This depiction was continued in medieval bestiaries where the terms aegipans and satyrs were sometimes used to describe ape-like or bestial creatures. These are thought to be fanciful descriptions of baboons or monkeys.
Pliny the Elder, The Natural History 5:8
Later writers such as Pliny the Elder used the terms "Aegipanes", "Aegipans", or "Oegipans" to describe a race of satyr-like wild men said to reside in Libya. This depiction was continued in medieval bestiaries where the terms aegipans and satyrs were sometimes used to describe ape-like or bestial creatures. These are thought to be fanciful descriptions of baboons or monkeys.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Primus Inter Pares, First Among Equals:
All Europeans are equals in Christ and race, however among these equals there are clear genetic superiors (primus inter pares, first among equals).
97% of recent human accomplishment was achieved by White males born in Northwestern Europe, which heavily corresponds to reduced 'West Siberian and Natufian' admixture; while both are pure Caucasian groups, they are evidently not as good in genetic quality as the predominately 'West Steppe Herder/ Early European Farmer/ West Hunter Gatherer' Northwestern Europe.
The sphere of Primus Inter Pares was raised north away from Italy and over Scotland, Ireland and Lower Scandinavia, as the epicentre of accomplishment (>60%) was from on either side of the English channel, with reduced accomplishment from the forementioned regions due to smaller populations.
Raising the quality of all Europeans would require disproportionately higher NWE fertility rates, and NWE migration across Europe to intermingle with other Europeans.
All Europeans are equals in Christ and race, however among these equals there are clear genetic superiors (primus inter pares, first among equals).
97% of recent human accomplishment was achieved by White males born in Northwestern Europe, which heavily corresponds to reduced 'West Siberian and Natufian' admixture; while both are pure Caucasian groups, they are evidently not as good in genetic quality as the predominately 'West Steppe Herder/ Early European Farmer/ West Hunter Gatherer' Northwestern Europe.
The sphere of Primus Inter Pares was raised north away from Italy and over Scotland, Ireland and Lower Scandinavia, as the epicentre of accomplishment (>60%) was from on either side of the English channel, with reduced accomplishment from the forementioned regions due to smaller populations.
Raising the quality of all Europeans would require disproportionately higher NWE fertility rates, and NWE migration across Europe to intermingle with other Europeans.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Appreciation of Southern and Eastern Europeans:
In relation to these previous posts.
—Freedom of Peopling.
—Nordicism.
—Lingua Franca.
—The World We Fight For.
—Primus Inter Pares.
In the previous few posts, we explored the superiority of NWEs among Whites; however I wanted to express those remarks weren't made to disparage Southern and Eastern Europeans (SEEs).
I simply see all Europeans as White brothers, equals; and made the remarks in terms of collective and respectful eugenics across the entire European genepool.
I don't see SEE ancestry as a detriment nor view them as less, they themselves have also accomplished many great and world changing feats; however their accomplishments don't compare to what we see from NWE.
Just as I'd want the best of England to disproportionately grow and become reflective of the nation, improving the nation for all those there; I wish the same for all of Europe and their diaspora across the world.
For a brighter future for all Whites.
In relation to these previous posts.
—Freedom of Peopling.
—Nordicism.
—Lingua Franca.
—The World We Fight For.
—Primus Inter Pares.
In the previous few posts, we explored the superiority of NWEs among Whites; however I wanted to express those remarks weren't made to disparage Southern and Eastern Europeans (SEEs).
I simply see all Europeans as White brothers, equals; and made the remarks in terms of collective and respectful eugenics across the entire European genepool.
I don't see SEE ancestry as a detriment nor view them as less, they themselves have also accomplished many great and world changing feats; however their accomplishments don't compare to what we see from NWE.
Just as I'd want the best of England to disproportionately grow and become reflective of the nation, improving the nation for all those there; I wish the same for all of Europe and their diaspora across the world.
For a brighter future for all Whites.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Racial Hygiene, Love:
From a place of love, not hate, to raise us all up and leave no one behind.
In hate, it looks like what we see today: a small ethnic group ruling over the entire world as an ethnic elite over the serf masses.
In love, it recognises all Whites as racial equals, only inequal in quality of body.
This is the central point of Christianity, that all Whites are equals, equals in Christ. We love our race and wish respectful improvement collectively.
A White man with poor eyesight is inferior to a White man with great eyesight.
We don't hate the man with poor eyesight and would never wish harm on him; we simply recognise his biological caveats.
Those with greater eyesight should have greater fertility rates so that the children of both men inherit the better traits, and are collectively improved.
Substitute the example of eyesight with any trait: IQ, stature, agility, ethnic-traits, genetic defects, etc, and understand there's no hate, it's for all of our future White children: Adamkind.
From a place of love, not hate, to raise us all up and leave no one behind.
In hate, it looks like what we see today: a small ethnic group ruling over the entire world as an ethnic elite over the serf masses.
In love, it recognises all Whites as racial equals, only inequal in quality of body.
This is the central point of Christianity, that all Whites are equals, equals in Christ. We love our race and wish respectful improvement collectively.
A White man with poor eyesight is inferior to a White man with great eyesight.
We don't hate the man with poor eyesight and would never wish harm on him; we simply recognise his biological caveats.
Those with greater eyesight should have greater fertility rates so that the children of both men inherit the better traits, and are collectively improved.
Substitute the example of eyesight with any trait: IQ, stature, agility, ethnic-traits, genetic defects, etc, and understand there's no hate, it's for all of our future White children: Adamkind.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
You should not believe the lies that jews are currently spreading about us, they make baseless claims with no evidence against us, because we love God and love our race, in that order; and wish to discredit us.
Those who support their blantant lies, join them as liars.
We shouldn't expect anything less from jews however, as their father Satan is the father of lies. John 8:44
When these evil people attack me, they will stumble and fall; even if an army of these Jews surround me, I will trust in God. Psalm 27:2-3
You shall not lie. Exodus 20:26; Leviticus 19:11; Deuteronomy 5:20
A false witness will not go unpunished, those who breathe lies will perish. Proverbs 19:9
Liars will find their portion in the lake of fire. Revelation 21:8
I will take no part in their unfruitful works of darkness, they will expose themselves. Ephesians 5:11
Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. Galatians 6:7-8
They hate God.
They hate the White race.
God will deal with these liars, jews and nons, Himself.
You have God to fear.
Those who support their blantant lies, join them as liars.
We shouldn't expect anything less from jews however, as their father Satan is the father of lies. John 8:44
When these evil people attack me, they will stumble and fall; even if an army of these Jews surround me, I will trust in God. Psalm 27:2-3
You shall not lie. Exodus 20:26; Leviticus 19:11; Deuteronomy 5:20
A false witness will not go unpunished, those who breathe lies will perish. Proverbs 19:9
Liars will find their portion in the lake of fire. Revelation 21:8
I will take no part in their unfruitful works of darkness, they will expose themselves. Ephesians 5:11
Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. Galatians 6:7-8
They hate God.
They hate the White race.
God will deal with these liars, jews and nons, Himself.
You have God to fear.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Did Moses Marry A Negro? No.
Moses had two wives, Zipporah the Midianite [Ex 2:18. 3:1] and an unnamed Cushite [Nu 12:1]. Whether he was married to them concurrently or not, is unknown.
Midianites were the descendants of Midian, the son of Abraham and his wife Keturah [Ge 25:1-2] a very closely related tribe to Moses (diverging from Abraham), which lived in the northwest of the Arabian Peninsula, on the east shore of the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea. They could not be negros.
Cushites were the descendants of Ham [Ge 10:6] and his father Noah's wife [Ge 9:22; Le 18:8. 20:11] a related tribe to Moses (diverging from Noah), which lived throughout North Africa, East Africa & West Asia; mainly around Egypt. They could not be negros.
Moses married his Cushite wife in Hazeroth (28.92°34.48°) [Nu 11:35 12:16], located on the east of the Sinai Peninsula, inland from the west shore of the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea. She resided far from Sub-Sahara, in Cushite settlements in West Asia.
Moses didn't marry a negro.
Moses had two wives, Zipporah the Midianite [Ex 2:18. 3:1] and an unnamed Cushite [Nu 12:1]. Whether he was married to them concurrently or not, is unknown.
Midianites were the descendants of Midian, the son of Abraham and his wife Keturah [Ge 25:1-2] a very closely related tribe to Moses (diverging from Abraham), which lived in the northwest of the Arabian Peninsula, on the east shore of the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea. They could not be negros.
Cushites were the descendants of Ham [Ge 10:6] and his father Noah's wife [Ge 9:22; Le 18:8. 20:11] a related tribe to Moses (diverging from Noah), which lived throughout North Africa, East Africa & West Asia; mainly around Egypt. They could not be negros.
Moses married his Cushite wife in Hazeroth (28.92°34.48°) [Nu 11:35 12:16], located on the east of the Sinai Peninsula, inland from the west shore of the Gulf of Aqaba on the Red Sea. She resided far from Sub-Sahara, in Cushite settlements in West Asia.
Moses didn't marry a negro.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Ancient Egyptian Commoner:
Bedouins are "tent-dwelling" nomads who roamed the deserts of the Middle East; they epitomize the best adaptation of human life to desert conditions.
They are known for their "relatively" pure genome, lacking the negro taint most in MENA have. Despite claims of perfect purity, they have approximately 17% negro admixture (ranging 11—39%). Close in purity to Saudi Arabians who have up to 20% negro admixture [1].
Genetic studies have shown that the common* Ancient Egyptians are genetically most similar to modern Jordanians and Bedouins, with the exception of having no negro admixture [2].
*The nobility of course being of a more continental European stock.
The man depicted in the image is a purer than usual Bedouin, which looks remarkably Caucasian compared to most Arabs today. This man, and others like him, are the closest genetically to common Ancient Egyptians.
If you want a reasonable visualisation of the common Ancient Egyptian, it would be this man, but fairer in complexion.
Bedouins are "tent-dwelling" nomads who roamed the deserts of the Middle East; they epitomize the best adaptation of human life to desert conditions.
They are known for their "relatively" pure genome, lacking the negro taint most in MENA have. Despite claims of perfect purity, they have approximately 17% negro admixture (ranging 11—39%). Close in purity to Saudi Arabians who have up to 20% negro admixture [1].
Genetic studies have shown that the common* Ancient Egyptians are genetically most similar to modern Jordanians and Bedouins, with the exception of having no negro admixture [2].
*The nobility of course being of a more continental European stock.
The man depicted in the image is a purer than usual Bedouin, which looks remarkably Caucasian compared to most Arabs today. This man, and others like him, are the closest genetically to common Ancient Egyptians.
If you want a reasonable visualisation of the common Ancient Egyptian, it would be this man, but fairer in complexion.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Prometheus:
A world-wide reoccuring legend of a bearded giant, who arrives by sea, who stole fire to give to the people; inventing agriculture, architecture, written language and many other sciences, and founding their civilization.
Or a world-wide account of abnormally tall (in comparison) seafaring bearded men, who bring advanced (in comparison) foreign knowledge and technology to primitive peoples.
It is far more plausible that these were seafaring European men (who are far taller on average than other races) exploring the world in search of minerals or slave labour. Teaching these primitive races in the ways of technology and agriculture, in the pursuit of exploiting them for labour in mineral harvesting or construction.
Every genius act of this world, every meaningful accomplishment or discovery, every advancement in technology or the sciences, was the product of Whites.
A world-wide reoccuring legend of a bearded giant, who arrives by sea, who stole fire to give to the people; inventing agriculture, architecture, written language and many other sciences, and founding their civilization.
Or a world-wide account of abnormally tall (in comparison) seafaring bearded men, who bring advanced (in comparison) foreign knowledge and technology to primitive peoples.
----It is far more plausible that these were seafaring European men (who are far taller on average than other races) exploring the world in search of minerals or slave labour. Teaching these primitive races in the ways of technology and agriculture, in the pursuit of exploiting them for labour in mineral harvesting or construction.
Every genius act of this world, every meaningful accomplishment or discovery, every advancement in technology or the sciences, was the product of Whites.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Pedra da Gávea:
A mountain in the Brazilian rainforest which features what appears to be a carved head and an inscription written in a form of Proto-Sinatic (Phoenician) script; both of which are heavily eroded by weather, as you would expect with it's potential 2800 year age.
Archeologists claim it is just a coincidence it appears to be anything, caused randomly by weather erosion.
But is it too much of a coincidence to not only randomly erode a head into the mountain, but also erode a legible sentence, in a real script, used by a known seafaring civilization, making an intelligible statement, alluding to a time period at their height (~850ᴮᶜ), immediately preceding the foundation of Mesoamerican script (~800ᴮᶜ)?
That's a lot of coincidences.
A mountain in the Brazilian rainforest which features what appears to be a carved head and an inscription written in a form of Proto-Sinatic (Phoenician) script; both of which are heavily eroded by weather, as you would expect with it's potential 2800 year age.
Archeologists claim it is just a coincidence it appears to be anything, caused randomly by weather erosion.
But is it too much of a coincidence to not only randomly erode a head into the mountain, but also erode a legible sentence, in a real script, used by a known seafaring civilization, making an intelligible statement, alluding to a time period at their height (~850ᴮᶜ), immediately preceding the foundation of Mesoamerican script (~800ᴮᶜ)?
That's a lot of coincidences.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Misconception:
Christianity does not come from Judaism.
Christianity comes from the Yahwism practicing White tribes of the ancient Levant.
Judaism comes from the race-mixed outcasts of the ancient Levant who corrupted scripture with the satanic Babylonian Talmud (4th century AD).
Christianity does not come from Judaism.
Christianity comes from the Yahwism practicing White tribes of the ancient Levant.
Judaism comes from the race-mixed outcasts of the ancient Levant who corrupted scripture with the satanic Babylonian Talmud (4th century AD).