Some interesting graphs on IQ by race, religion and region. (pdf)
According to which:

By race and specific-religion, White Anglicans have the highest average IQ at 113. (2009)

By race and region, DC Whites have the highest average IQ at approximately 135. White Protestant boys slightly exceed this, and assumingly DC White boys score even higher. (2007)

What's interesting is the ~70 iq gap between blacks and Whites in DC. Whites in DC (135) have an average IQ that is double that of blacks in DC (68).

"IQ" vs. Standardized Tests: Preamble. (2007)

"When Wechsler was developing his IQ test, he found that out of 105 tests assessing skills in solving maze-puzzles, involving the most heterogeneous populations throughout the world, 99 showed an incontrovertible male superiority.

(Wechsler resolved this type of problem by eliminating all those tests that resulted in findings of significant sex differences.)"

So the IQs of men and women were "equalized" by throwing out 94% of the test? How important is this?
Worldwide, with rare exceptions, annual incomes increase an average of $2,000 for each one point increase in IQ, with Japanese men at the top (with an IQ greater than 110 and annual income greater than $110,200) and black women in Africa at the bottom (with an IQ less than 55 and annual income less than $200).
The IQ gap between Asian men and Asian women when correlated with GRE scores is 19 points, when correlated with SAT math scores is 14 points, TIMSS physics scores is 17 points, PISA math scores at 15 years old is 10 points, ACT math scores is 19 points, IAEP math scores is 12 points, and NAEP 12th grade math scores is 10 points.
The IQ gap between sexes for all other races is similar, and by comparison the IQ gap between the US (at 98) and Mexico (at 87) is only 11 points which represents an annual income gap of $22,000 ($4,870 in Mexico, $26,870 in the US)

"Psychiatrists and psychologists are likely to use the definition contained in the DSM-IV-TR, the manual used to make diagnostic judgments. Here mental retardation is defined as 1) an IQ of approximately 70 or below, 2) concurrent deficits or impairments in present adaptive functioning in two areas (communication, self-care, home-living, social/interpersonal skills, the use of community resources, self-direction, functional academic skills, work, leisure, health, and safety), 3) onset before age 18."

By this definition, HALF of African Blacks, and perhaps three quarters of American Blacks, are Retarded.
(definition of mental retardation iq below 70, lowered from 85)

There are 5,940,000 female and 4,861,000 male students in our undergraduate schools, and if the math skills of these girls follows the pattern of the Howard Wainer study, then 2,678,940 girls have math skills equivalent to boys who flunk out of math, 1,799,820 have math skills equivalent to boys who get D's, and 1,455,300 have math skills equivalent to boys who get C's.

None of them have math skills which would qualify them to follow a career in STEMS, while more than half of the 5,940,000 boys who were rejected (or 2,970,000 of them) to make room for these girl students, WOULD have benefited from a career in STEMS.

Why would we as a society do this at a time when high tech careers are so valuable, and so profitable? It's like cutting our nose off to spite our face. If you ever wondered why we can't make our own shoes, much less our own semiconductors and electronics, and instead must go all the way to China to have them made for us, then now you know why.

Math tests simply present mathematical facts to students to measure how well they can solve problems, and cannot be designed to "discriminate against" women, Blacks, Hispanics, nor Asians (particularly Asian men who score higher than the so-called privileged White men). The fact that 51% of college boys can solve
problems ( and thus get A's and B's in college math) which no girls can solve, not even those who get A's in college math, means just that--no American girl can solve problems that at least half of American boys have proven on SAT math tests that they CAN solve. All math problems are representative of how well a citizen can solve problems at school, at work, in science, in politics, and in life.

If all of the 5,940,000 boys who had been denied admission to make room for this many girls, had instead been accepted, we would now have 10,801,000 boys in college, and at least half of them, or 5,400,500 boys who CAN solve math problems, would be in our undergraduate schools where they CAN benefit from an undergraduate education.

Angels can be Human Messengers. (2019) by Bible House of Grace.

Angels Can Be Human Messengers:
Something noticed by many early Church fathers is that "angel" in both the Old and New Testament are words meaning "messenger" and not a celestial being. However this isn't to say angels aren't real, as these celestial beings may just be called messengers.
But could they have just been men?

The following are 65 explicit uses of angel for men who were messengers:
malak (מֲלְאָךְ): a messenger
Genesis 32:3; Numbers 20:14. 21:21; Joshua 7:22, 24; Judges 11:12, 17; 1 Samuel 16:19. 19:11. 23:27; 2 Samuel 2:5. 3:12. 5:11. 11:18-19, 22-23, 25. 12:27; 1 Kings 19:2. 22:12-13; 2 Kings 5:10. 6:32-33. 9:18. 10:7-8. 14:8. 16:7. 19:23; 1 Chronicles 14:1; 2 Chronicles 18:12. 36:15; Job 1:13-14. 33:22-24; Proverbs 13:17. 16:14. 17:11; Isaiah 14:32. 42:18-19. 44:24-25; Ezekiel 23:40. 30:9; Nahum 2:13; Haggai 1:13; Malachi 2:7. 3:1.

aggelos (ἄγγελος): a messenger
Matthew 11:9-11; Mark 1:1-3; Luke 7:24, 27. 9:51-52; 2 Corinthians 8:23. 12:7; James 2:25.

Psalms Of Solomon 17:7 [LXX]
⁷ καὶ σύ ὁ θεός καταβαλεῖς αὐτοὺς καὶ ἀρεῖς τὸ σπέρμα αὐτῶν ἀπὸ τῆς γῆς ἐν τῷ ἐπαναστῆναι αὐτοῖς ἄνθρωπον ἀλλότριον γένους ἡμῶν
⁷ But you, O God, will overthrow them and will remove their offspring from the earth, when there rises up against them a person that is foreign to our race.

Preterism, an inherently racist and anti-semitic doctrine to it's core:
Preterism* is the view that all predictions, prophecies, etc were 100% completed by ᴬᴰ70; everything is fulfilled.
  *full orthodox Preterism

Anti-Semitic:
The Second Coming of Christ was a set of events where Jesus came back and aided the Romans in butchering millions of Jews in the Roman-Jewish wars.

Racist:
Impossible for Nons to be saved as the prophecy of "all being evangelized to" only made it to Whites in Europe, North Africa and West Asia, when the prophecy was completed. Solidifying the fact only Whites are Adamic (human).

Cherubim and Seraphim Explained —Cherubs and Seraphs in the Bible, by Ron Graham.

"The passages we have studied in these notes are not about angelology. They do not inform us about angels, but about the wisdom, power, glory, mercy, righteousness, and grace of God. He wants his children to believe and obey his word so that he can grant them eternal blessings from his presence. He will punish rebellion, but it is his wish to provide atonement and have his children come welcome into his house."

Angel Variations?
Many different types of Angels have been suggested over the past 2000 years by many great theologians.

For this post, I'll be looking at the most influential Christian angelic hierarchy: De Coelesti Hierarchia (On the Celestial Hierarchy) written between the 5th and 6th century AD by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.
While this is the most influential, most Christians today are extremely critical of the list, for reasons you'll quickly understand.

Dionysius described nine classes of celestial beings:
—Seraph (שָׂרָף saráf) fiery serpent.
—Cherub (כְּרוּב k'rúv) cherub, griffin.
—Throne (θρόνος thrónos) throne, seat.
—Dominion (κῡ‌ρῐος kū‌rios) baron, lord.
—Virtue (virtūs): virtues.
—Power (ἐξουσῐ‌ᾱ exousíā) authority.
—Principality (αρχή archí): government administration.
—Archangel (ἀρχᾰ‌γγελος arkhángelos): chief-messenger.
—Angel (ἄγγελος ángelos): messenger.

From a glance and a curious read of verses mentioning the above, you'll quickly find that Thrones, Dominions, Powers and Principalities, aren't angel classes and don't allude to such in scripture: they're governmental bodies and qualities.
Virtues is also a quality, and is only mentioned in the Latin Vulgate.

Seraphim, for such a popularly known Angel, is curiously mentioned only 7 times [Numbers 21:6, 8; Deuteronomy 8:15; Isaiah 6:2,6. 14:29] 5 of which is translated "fiery serpent", only being translated "Seraphim" in Isaiah 6:2,6.
This chapter describes singing flying serpents, which is clearly just poetic language.

Archangel and Angel, translate as chief messenger (primary) and messenger; however they do allude to being a celestial being.

Cherubs are the most commonly mentioned of above, but are never claimed as being either an angel nor alluded to it; they are simply mentioned with itself: "cherub", and are mostly quoted as decorations of an Akkadian mythological creature (aside from Ezekiels vision).

I'm just scratching the surface on these topics to keep it short, but if you want an in-depth analysis on Seraphs and Cherubs, I recommend this article.

In conclusion: Seraphs, Cherubs, Thrones, Dominions, Virtues, Powers and Principalities, are not classes of Angels; and the only two classes of Angels are "Archangels" and "Angels", the former of which is just a head/ chief Angel.

As a last thought, were Angels actually celestial beings, or were they just men who were messengers of God?

Gratuity (tipping):
Puts power in the hands of the White consumer and White businessman, by effectively making tipping a system of economic nepotism, by removing the mandatory full wage for workers in services and making it a voluntary variable, which obviously always has unintended racial connotations, in favour of Whites.

Empirically how both the average White and Non tips, already is disproportionately in favour of Whites:
—only Whites tip substantially.
—Whites get the best tips.
—Nons don't tip.
—when Nons do tip, it's to Whites.
—all races don't tip Nons.
—businesses fire Nons and the unattractive, due to tipping trends they carry.
—the Whiter you are, the better your tip (Nordicism).
These aren't absolutes, but where the figures lean significantly.

The world already unintentionally leans on following the:—
    "Any White who pays a non-white for goods or services is a race traitor."
—rule, just aide it intentionally.

Take power, never tip Nons, only ever tip Whites who give good service.

The World's Racial Perspective:
Despite what those in our circles believe, we all need to come back to reality.

The reality? The world isn't against Whites, most people, leaders and governments genuinely believe in the vision of a "one human mulatto overman race."
Of course this idea was largely designed and perpetrated by Jews, but people world over genuinely believe in this and actively work towards it.

Such a goal threatens the White race (as it threatens all races), and Whites are resented for our continued in-group preference and success, despite their best efforts.

However such goals and systems in place can be an opportunity for White racial success, as we already see the process take unintentional huge negative effects against the Non world, which is rapidly declining in fertility rates the past few decades.

Whites should push these processes further in the Non world, and for Nons in the West, to force Non decline; while getting in positions of power to ensure White preservation.

More in image.

For clarity:
—Jews have sold the world a vision of a "one-worldism one human mulatto overman race" and people, leaders and governments actively work towards this with sincere interest.
—This threatens White survival, and Whites are resented for still remaining in-group and successful, despite best efforts.
—Jews have done this to have all non-Jews mix into a mulatto mass and be fed birth control until they disappear, and they overtake them.
—Jewish end-goal is a Jewish Ethnoplanet, if Jews wanted to rule over a lower class, a White world would be infinitely better to rule over.
—This plan is actually failing Jews and it appears the mulatto vision is popular among Jews and consuming them, only Israel protects them.
—This plan is actually starting to help Whites, as they remain in-group and successful.
—Whites could use this inversely for a White Ethnoplanet, while not currently in our favour, great strides can be made.
—What this could look like, is gaining positions of power to protect and encourage: White racial purity, high White fertility rates, Non race-mixing among themselves, low Non fertility rates.
https://t.iss.one/ChristianAryanism/402

Limpieza De Sangre (Purity Of Blood):
Translated literally as "cleanliness of blood" (blood purity), was an extremely aggressive, wide-spread and popular system of racialized discrimination used in early modern Spain and Portugal, which barred anyone, even Christians, who had any Muslim or Jewish ancestry, from education, political offices, religious orders, and even travel: to the standard of one-drop.
Another form of Hereditary Heathenism.

Towards the end of the Reconquista of the Iberian Peninsula, almost all Muslims and Jews were expelled from the Peninsula, with the exception of 1m Muslim (Moriscos) and 200k Jewish (Conversos) converts, known as "New Christians" collectively.

—1449: 1st purity statute, in Toledo, Spain, which conversos and their descendants were banned from official positions.
—1496: Pope Alexander VI approved a purity statute for the Hieronymites.
—Basque given universal hidalguía (nobility): assumed pure of blood because it was never conquered by Muslims.
—Abolished 26 October 1866.

Should be noted that the Spanish Golden Age kicked off shortly after this was instituted.

Biblical Narratives Aren't Pious Fairytales:
Often critics of Christianity will point to biblical examples of poor moral conduct as examples of Christian values, despite biblical condemnation of those actions, often even within the account of the conduct itself; meant to be learned from, examples of consequence.

What these critics overlook is that the bible records a history of real people, with real problems, who like real people make mistakes, often do the wrong thing, fight on the wrong side of wars, and are morally flawed.
However just as they can be deeply flawed, they also overcame and became great extraordinary world changing men.

We don't need to live in the fairytale that our entire lineage from the dawn of time were hyper-pious warriors who could do no wrong.
They were real people, and real people make mistakes, they fall short, they succumb to vices.

It's simply the reality of our past, and it's our job to be better than them, and to ensure our children are better than us.

Too Many Chiefs Not Enough Indians:
Used to describe a situation where there are too many people giving orders and not enough people to carry them out.

While likely not originally themed on Injuns, it would have been adapted and popularised as such, as a polemic on the general consensus on why Injuns were entirely conquered and nearly erased:
That Injuns were both too divided amongst themselves, and too few of them were willing to actually put work in; most were instead trying to be idle leaders. Too many chiefs giving orders, not enough Indians following them.
While the White Americans were all united, taking orders from few men, who systematically conquered their adversary.

We have this problem among the dissent-right, too many of us are trying to become some kind of quasi-Fuhrer, an ideological leader, while being deadly allergic to any meaningful work.

Most are obsessed with being leaders, sporting our unique mspaint flags, and refuse to fall in line and follow.

This will be our downfall.

530 years ago, today, 12th October, 1492; one of history's most significant events occured.

A Genovese man, come explorer, lead a Spanish enterprise to cross the Atlantic Ocean in search of an alternative route to the Far East, instead he landed in the New World, the Americas.
This moment began an era of centuries of rapid colonisation by Europeans, of not only of the Americas, but every single piece of land on earth.

The wonders built, the technologies created, the continents conquered, the interstellar travelled, what we achieved in such a short period of time was extraordinary and unprecedented; which we hope to reconquer once again.
All this began with Christopher Columbus.

Happy Columbus Day!

Was Christopher Columbus Jewish?
No and it's absurd to claim anything other than Genovan. The "evidence" for a Jewish ethnic background is extremely speculative at best and barely worth a grain of salt.

I could go over all the details but it's best summarised here:
    "The Catalan, French, Galician, Greek, Ibizan, Jewish, Majorcan, Scottish, and other Columbuses concocted by historical fantasists are agenda-driven creations, usually inspired by a desire to arrogate a supposed or confected hero to the cause of a particular nation or historic community – or, more often than not, to some immigrant group striving to establish a special place of esteem in the United States. The evidence of Columbus's origins in Genoa is overwhelming: almost no other figure of his class or designation has left so clear a paper trail in the archives."
—1492: The Year the World Began (2009) by British historian Felipe.

Columbus was simply Genovan; however we'll know for sure soon, as an international DNA study for Columbus' precise ethnicity began in 2021, using his remains in Seville. If the results are honest, don't expect anything surprising nor exotic, given his location and class, Columbus will likely be Swiss-like.

Why is the dissent-right entertaining Jewish agenda-driven claims that Columbus was Jewish?
For an agenda-driven claim of their own, typically of pagans wanting to beat Christians to the Americas, by romanticising Leif Erikson's journey to North America.

The flaws here are:
  — Erikson's L'Anse aux Meadows settlement in Newfoundland Canada was established around ~ᴬᴰ1015. Nearly 500 years prior to Columbus, so it's inconsequential if Columbus was this or that, Erikson still got there prior.
  — Erikson was a Christian missionary, so you can't romanticise this as some kind of "viking pagan" victory.
  — Erikson's journey was historically insignificant and meaningless; had no effect on anything beyond some rocks in Newfoundland and a reference in some old books.
  — Erikson's settlement was a failed settlement, all inhabitants either left or died, Columbus began the complete, permanent and successful conquering of the New World by Whites.
  — Erikson isn't even the first European to reach the Americas by a long shot, he's just one of the few capable of returning to tell the story, Solutreans, Romans, Phoenicians, other Vikings, etc, are known to have made it to the Americas, but none returned to Europe, all dying in the New World.
  — Solutreans (from ancient France) arrived in North America using the extended Atlantic ice shelf close to 30,000 years ago, being the first settlers, until being killed and absorbed into the colonizing Ameridans.

I've rambled enough, let's summarise:
    White man discovered and conquered two continents, Jews mad and want to appropriate this achievement. Apparently we're shocked?

Who Should We Follow?
Too Many Chiefs Not Enough Indians.
  Who do we bend the knee to? Who is going to pull the sword out of the stone?

Unfortunately I don't have that answer, we still need pious, fearless and uncompromising leaders; we just shouldn't all be trying to larp as such.
  The narcissim of trying to assert yourself as a leader is rampant in the dissent-right; pure acts of vanity.

You will know them when they arise, they will be: charismatic, in good shape (disciplined), clean groomed (presentable), demonstrate leadership qualities and be actually White, an example of such is Thomas Rousseau of Patriot Front.
   Both Tom and PF may not be agreeable nor suitable for everyone, but regardless, he demonstrates himself a capable leader.

I specifically stated the obvious: must be a White man; because for some reason we often rally behind obvious Nons or literal Jews. The controlled opposition "White Power"-Jew is a threat to us all.
Good and trustworthy leaders will be White men, exclusively (of good character).

Religion:
One other important and overlooked leadership quality is being religiously ambiguous/ agnostic, they're leading a racial movement, not a church.

Whites follow many different religions, and even more specific sub-groups (denominations), making your movement a specific religion will only achieve alienating the majority of Whites.
Keep it a single-issue movement: for White preservation, prosperity and expansion.

Understandably leaders will always have their religious opinions and affiliations, it's their job to keep it to themselves.
  Often I see "leaders" set out to promote, or create new or syncretic religions, which just: make them look goofy, alienate anyone serious, and cause infighting; this is an example of a bad leader.
  It's best to simply not discuss religion and leave that issue personal to followers.

However it goes without saying that we believe all Whites should be Christian (they can always be evangelized anytime) and perhaps of our specific denomination, but the pressing issue today is White racial extinction; we need to stop getting distracted.

Freedom of Religion:
The concept of religious freedom developed out of severe religious persecution in Europe, where Whites were killing each other over differences in religion.

American religious freedom sought to guarantee basic rights to life for all Whites and to unite Whites, despite their different religions and beliefs, under the doctrine of White Nationalism.

Historically American religious freedom only extended to variants of Protestantism and Deism, only extending to Mormonism once they renounced certain beliefs/ practices, and only extending to Catholicism in very recent times due to fears of divided loyalties fading.

This ultimately demonstrated Freedom of Religion still required Protestant morality standards and belief in a single God, and wasn't so lax to allow anything and everything.

It also certainly didn't allow America's Freedom of Peopling to all, which was only extended to Northwestern Europeans, with small tolerable quotas for other Whites.

Cuius Regio, Eius Religio.
Whose realm, his religion.

Many don't understand that American "Freedom of Religion" was the ideal improvement to the former European "Cuius regio, eius religio" which had forced the common White man to believe whatever religion his local ruler believed, regardless of his personal thoughts.

This caused immense European division and dissent; if America wanted to emerge and continue as a powerful unified state, this had to change. American principles also wanted to maintain individual liberty, which cannot occur with forced religion and persecuted intellectual freedom.

America was founded as a Protestant nation, with an expectation to be Protestant, and freedom to whatever belief you had; as long as you met three precedents:
—Protestant-Christian morality.
—White racial loyalty.
—Loyalty to the nation-state (America).
This effectively birthed White Nationalism as we know today.

Like them, I believe in full Freedom of Religion, but I expect you to be Protestant, or be seen as odd.