Disappointed or ashamed of where you are?
Do something about it.

Breaking Down The Poll:
https://t.iss.one/ChristianAryanism/329

1488 respondants (at the time)
- 129 (9%) shouldn't breed.
- 631 (42%) are single.
- 232 (16%) are courting.
- 144 (9%) are in a commited relationship.
- 278 (19%) have White children.
- 23 (2%) have more than 5 White children.
- 51 (3%) have more than 10 White children.

352 (24%) have White children, totalling between 1528—1829 White children; which is actually rather impressive.

So while it's disappointing and shameful to see so many (631 / 42%) single with no dating prospects, these results actually aren't too bad.
352 (24%) respondants have nearly 2000 White children, 376 (25%) respondants are in the process of building a family, and 631 (42%) respondants need to get their priorities in order.

However for those respondants who are single, you should feel shame and disgust looking at these results. You are a huge portion of our group, that all preach White advocacy yet you are taking no part in actually securing and propagating the race, and effectively hold the race back, you are dead weight: larpers.

If all 1359 (minus those who shouldn't breed) respondants had:
- 1 child, that would be 1,359 White children.
- 5 children, that would be 6,795 White children.
- 10 children, that would be 13,590 White children.
All raised racially aware. You can see how quickly this increases, even from a small group.
A million Whites doing exactly this would have 10 million White children, which is on par with China's birthrate fuelled by 2 billion 'people'. 10 million Whites with 10 children each would be the supermajority of birthrates worldwide; let alone subsequent generations continuing in your footsteps.

This poll was put up to highlight the huge portion (as expected) of our circles which are effectively larpers, so we can address the issue and embolden change; and to encourage existing parents to have much larger White families.

It's about time you got your priorities in order: go outside, meet a girl and start a large White family.

Find yourself a modest spouse who values family and race, who you can build a large White family with.

It's what we all want, so work towards it.

Saint Paul only preached to White people and said it was done, even reaching the furthest reaches of Britannia.

The Gospel was only intended for the White race.

Christian Identity: Join, or Die.

An iconic political cartoon by Benjamin Franklin (1754) used to unite the disunited Thirteen Colonies, to be victorious in the American Revolutionary War; is used again to unite Whites.

One faith embodies European religious, cultural and political history.
One faith uncompromisingly maintains White racial purity.
One faith maintains White interests, past and present.

Christian Identity. Join, or we all perish at the hands of our enemy.

Four standards of Christian Identity:
¹ The Lord is a Triune God, as defined at Nicæa: the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit; who through Christ was crucified, died and resurrected to save His people.
² The White race alone are Adamkind: the unadulterated descendants of Adam; who was the first White man, the first Caucasian.
³ Adamkind alone: are children of the Lord, have souls, are human, can be Christian, and have the opportunity of Salvation.
⁴ There is no fellowship nor communion with the Nons: the non-Adamic, non-White homonids.

Christian Identity is the best hope for true White unity, that includes religious unity.

While we promote and have curated a very unique and particular strain of Christian Identity (Christian Aryanism), we understand that many of us have differing views, however most of these differences are inconsequential; only these Four Tenets matter in the grand scheme; the rest can be respected differences.

All Whites are already brothers in Christ, whether they recognise it or not, it's not their choice, it's God's.
However, in Christian Identity, we have true cultural, ethnic and religious: exclusivity and unity.


Join one of the chats to learn more:
General— Christian Identity:
t.iss.one/+yg4Mm3Fa2n05Nzdh
Specific— Christian Aryanism:
t.iss.one/ChurchOfChristianAryanism

An Fear Dubh: the Black Man and the Devil.

It is interesting that the Irish (Gaelic) word for "devil" is "an fear dubh" which translates literally to "the black man".
What did the early Irish mean by this? There's much speculation but I couldn't find much concrete; however here are some verses translated literally from the Irish (Gaelic) bible regarding the Devil:

Acts 13:10
¹⁰ “A dhuine atá lán den uile chealg is ghliceas,” ar seisean, “a mhic an fear dubh agus a namhaid na huile chóra, nach stadfá de bheith ag camadh slite díreacha an Tiarna?
¹⁰ And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the black man, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?

1 Peter 5:8
⁸ Bígí measartha agus déanaigí faire, mar tá bhur n‑áibhirseoir, an fear dubh, ag gabháil timpeall mar a bheadh leon ag búiríl ar thóir dhuine éigin le slogadh.
⁸ Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the black man, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

1 John 3:8
⁸ An té a dhéanann an peaca is den fear dubh é mar gur peacach an fear dubh ó thús. Is chuige seo a foilsíodh Mac Dé, go scriosfadh sé saothar an fear dubh.
⁸ He that committeth sin is of the black man; for the black man sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the black man.

Hereditary Heathenism:
The Anglo-Virginians (early North American British settlers) conflated White & Christian, and Nonwhite & Heathen; often simply referring to Whites as Christians and Nonwhites as Heathens, regardless of actual religion. This conflation continued well after until the secularisation of the United States.

The Anglo-Virginians concluded that the non-Christianity of both Injuns and Negros was immutable (unchangeable) and heritable; while the non-Christianity of any White was mutable (changeable) and not heritable. Even Christian nonwhites would still be viewed as heathens.

The result of this view of Hereditary Heathenism was a quasi one drop purity standard for Whites. As nonwhites are permanently heathens incapable of Christianity, as well as all their descendants; and a single nonwhite ancestor meant you were also incapable of being Christian.

This is identical to contemporary Christian views on the incapacity of fauna to be Christians: which is suitable as nonwhites are fauna.

Hereditary Heathenism: A Corruption?

In "The Baptism of Early Virginia: How Christianity Created Race" R.A. Goetz demonstrates the modern concept of the White race, as well as White exclusivity of Christianity developed out of Anglican Christianity in the British colonies of North America.

Goetz claims the development of these two views were a corruption of Christianity, which rapidly expanded out of North America and found common (albeit not universal) belief across the White world.

However, I'd argue that the corruption was the Christian English's move to racial universalism, not the Christian Anglo-Virginian's move to racial exclusivity; which I see as a correction.

If Jesus, the Apostles and Disciples believed the non-white races were capable of Christianity, why were there no attempts to evangelize them? They completely neglected them, and to rub salt into that wound, they then claimed the Gospel had reached (albeit not converted) every man, whilst only reaching Whites universally.

The corruption of Christianity to lose White exclusivity is simply due to European isolation from the non-white races for over a millennium; coupled with the White race's predisposition to altruism. An important White trait, misplaced with concern for non-whites.

Hereditary Heathenism in layman terms is the Christian belief that fauna is incapable of Christianity, a standard belief throughout Christianity.
However, Christ believed non-whites to be fauna, and that belief re-emerged with the Anglo-Virginians.

Early America: Proto Christian Identity.

Due to the Anglo-Virginian belief of Hereditary Heathenism against the nonwhite races, I've just realised the Early British settlers of North America actually practiced an early form of Christian Identity.

While the name did not exist, and these views were rather informal, with rather primitive reasoning/ justification, it covered the four pillars of Christian Identity:
¹ Trinitarian Christianity.
² Whites are Adamic, alone.
³ Adamic (White) Exclusivity.
⁴ Separation from Nons.

Additionally, if you look at the progression of this over the centuries, you find what is strikingly similar to the sub-denomination Christian Aryanism.

To articulate this, Christian Aryanism is modelled on Anglicanism, and heavily inspired by: Early American Puritan/ Anglo-Virginian views, later American Liberal Protestantism, and recent formal American Christian Identity.

Liberal Protestantism (not to be confused with the political position) is a field of enlightenment era Protestantism which takes care to interpret scripture to maintain Christianity, but to take into consideration new scientific knowledge to also maintain intellectual rationalism (i.e. Scientific Christianity).

This Liberal Protestantism is what sparked the vast scientific racism of the 18-19th century America and Europe, as the rational position is no matter how you try to cut, twist, squeeze scripture, you cannot fit non-whites into any of it. Adam born Lake Van West Asia, his descendants spreading from there, Noah's progeny spreading throughout Europe, West Asia and North Africa. Considering human migration, this anthropologically accounts for only Caucasians with perfect correlation, there is simply no room to account for a single non-white race.

Christian Aryanism is actually fairly standard 18-19th century American Liberal Protestantism, with rational views of scientificism, racism, cessationism and preterism; the largest difference being CA is much more formal in these views, putting together a consistent and coherent Catechism of these views.

This rant was less about discussing the intricacies of CI/CA and more about demonstrating the historicity of both Christian Identity and the sub-denomination Christian Aryanism. Both of which have enjoyed a long, rich history in North America, albeit not in name, which I've previously demonstrated was the original Christian position.

Primeval History:
Is the name given by scholars to Genesis 1-11, separated from Genesis 12-50 (known as Ancestral History) for it's completely separate literacy style.

Primeval History ¹⁻¹¹ accounts the very beginning of time, and rapidly progresses through history, only touching on the broad strokes, with very minimal accounts, until reaching Ancestral History ¹²⁻⁵⁰ where Abraham enters the scene, and we now receive a very detail account of his, and his descendants life and journeys.

The distinction between Primeval and Ancestral History is very important for their literacy style is completely different, Primeval History is extremely allegorical and extreme care should be taken to elucidate what is literal and what is poetic; however Ancestral History is an entirely literal historical account and should not be allegorised.

What in Primeval History is allegorical or literal is a subject of intense debate, but you shouldn't fuss over the little details; only that God intentionally made the White man.

Refuting Those "Flat Earth Bible Verses": You Should Have Checked the Context (Pastor Mike Winger):
0:00 Intro.
3:28 “Ends of Earth.”
12:49 Biblical Earth rotation.
18:22 Signet-ring/seal translation to prove some flat-earth argument with Job quote.
29:10 “The earth is My footstool.”
32:48 “Pillars of the earth.”
37:12 “Cornerstone.”
41:22 “Circle of the earth.”
45:45 “Vault of heaven.”
45:42 “Corners of the earth.”
49:56 “Foundations of the earth.”
52:56 "Waters under earth."
57:03 The earth is a "plateau"?
59:47 “Four corners of the earth” revisited.
1:03:31 "End of the whole earth.”
1:05:32 How did Jesus see "all the kingdoms" of the world from a mountain?
1:16:00 Ball or sphere diction.
1:17:20 What about the sun stopping in Joshua?
1:19:16 What if the Bible did teach a flat earth?
1:22:51 What about scholars who think the Bible teaches a flat earth?
1:23:58 Firmament stuff.
1:32:20 Stars falling from heaven + celestial body stuff.

The Colors Of Witchcraft: Ideas Of Race In The Puritan Theory Of Witchcraft (2016)
— Frank Pomeroy

Early American Puritans believed only Whites were made in the image of God, and the other races to be literal children of Satan.

America was considered the land of Satan due to the masses of nonwhites living there, and they felt it was their God sent mission to purge the land of "Satan's children" and develop the land. The beginning of the view of Manifest Destiny.

"When the Puritans looked out on those around them they saw human like forms, yet not made in the image of God... The Puritans believed they were made in Gods literal image..."

"The Puritans are living... in a land that they believe is the actual lair of Satan, surrounded by those whom they believe must be Satan’s children since they are of this land. In this environment a Puritan would do just about anything to stave off God’s wrath... they would have also included the blacks in the same category as the Natives."

George Burroughs:
Born ᴬᴰ1650 (Scituate Ma.) — Executed Aug 19, 1692 (Salem Ma.) but we aren't going to focus on his wrongful conviction, but how this conviction was determined.

He was a minister executed for the official charges of "Witchcraft" and "Conspiracy with the Devil".
This accusation arose from surviving two devasting Injun attacks on British settlements: Falmouth and Wells, Maine; and doubts on the purity of his ancestry.

Due to his miraculous survival of both attacks, and his darker than ordinary skin complexion, he was accused of conspiring with the Injuns. As the Injuns were considered literal children of Satan, it was considered conspiracy with Satan himself; Injun was also believed to be witchcraft practicing devil-worshippers (applying both charges to him).

Perhaps he did conspire with Injuns, but with the surviving records, his execution was unjustified, caused by paranoia; which regardless demonstrates how serious the Early American settlers took White racial purity, and their faith.