Jesus Christ was born on the 25ᵗʰ of December:

The same people that want you to believe Jesus Christ wasn't born December 25ᵗʰ are the same people who wish to dismantle anything regarding Jesus; to chip away at the belief of Jesus and make it popular opinion that he never existed and that all facts relating to him are made up. Below is an excerpt which sets the scene nicely:

" Of course the Lamb of God was born at the same time and in the same place as all of the Passover lambs.

Long ago, I accepted the idea that December 25 was probably not the actual date of Christ’s birth, that the real date was unknown but probably in the spring. Knowing the exact date doesn’t really impact the liturgical celebration, after all. It was just one more sad thing about being an adult, one more little bit of wonder gone from life.
Since then, I’ve become well acquainted with the historical evidence in favor of a date of December 25. The date can be derived historically from the dating of Zechariah’s entry into the temple to burn incense. It can also be derived theologically from the ancient tradition that a great prophet entered and left the world on the same calendar day. Thus, the Annunciation was determined to have occurred on the same day as the crucifixion, March 25. December 25 naturally follows nine months later. They are good arguments, held to strict standards of historical research and logic, within their own fields.

But neither ever quite satisfied my desire for something really concrete. One continual objection was that the shepherds in the fields at night were presumed to be attending to the dropping of lambs. And lambs didn’t drop in December. Lambs dropped in the spring, not the winter.

So, when yet another person asked “Why do we celebrate Christmas in December if lambs are born in the spring?” instead of explaining the significance of March 25, I suddenly wondered: ARE lambs actually born in the spring in Israel? Can I find out?

The Awassi sheep is a desert sheep, a fat-tailed breed that has existed in the Middle East for an estimated 5,000 years. It is the only indigenous breed of sheep in Israel. They are raised for wool, meat, and milk. Awassi sheep breed in the summer and drop lambs in the winter, when there is sufficient pasture for the ewes in milk. In Israel, the principal lambing season is December through January.

This is practical, I thought. This is fact. This is biology.

Sheep estrus, it turns out, varies according to breed. In northern breeds, estrus is triggered by the shortening of daylight after the autumn equinox. Breeding occurs naturally in October to November, and lambs are dropped in March and April. But, as you move geographically closer to the equator, the days don’t shorten as dramatically. Instead, sheep from subtropical and tropical areas tend to breed earlier, and drop lambs in the winter, or even breed and drop lambs year round.

This one little tidbit of information, for me, crystallized all the others. Of course Jesus, the Lamb of God, was born at the same time and in the same place as all of the Passover lambs. Of course this time was such that the day of His entry to and exit from the world are the same. Of course the nativity of John the Baptist is when it is because Jesus’s birth really is when it is.

Biology places great value on symmetry, and here was a symmetry to delight my intellect, a symmetry of history and theology and biology. Earlier, I had honestly mourned the loss of my childish wondering; now I find that this understanding has produced a greater and deeper wonder at the providence of God.

It is truly right and just. "

Is December 25ᵗʰ rooted of Paganism?
No, it is the birth of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Don't believe the fraudulent proofs against the date, do your own research and you'll find every single one of their claims against the dating is completely shrouded in lies and falsehood.

Just found an amazing website!
Dec25th.info website dedicated to exhaustively proving the date December 25th is the true date of Jesus Christ's birth.

Excerpt:
It’s that time of year again, the time when men of good will are subjected to the complaints of crusty, hard-hearted, pagan and atheist curmudgeons who would shut out every particle of joy from life; the time of year when we hear stale protests against the most celebrated event in history, the crowning point of the year, when the whole world rejoices at the Savior’s birth, and the story of the Nativity is told in every language; at that time when we should most rejoice for heaven’s salvation and the triumph of Christian faith, we are scolded instead, and told that celebrating Christmas is somehow “unchristian,” that it is somehow “pagan.”
“Wicked Christmas-keepers, Repent!”

Is there anything to these perennial objections? Can we celebrate the Nativity? Can we observe Christmas in our homes and churches? Or is the holiday season “lawful” only if it is secularized and kept free of Christ? Or is even this objectionable?
Throughout this website, we look at “anti-Christmasism” and address the question whether it is permitted to commemorate the Savior’s birth December 25th, and whether the dating is true?

Here's my attempt at translating the Christian Aryan Creed into Latin.

Felt it would be a nice touch. If you haven't already, you should check out the creed: here's the video, and here's the text.

Origins of Yule:
It's a common accusation that much of Christmas is derived from the old pagan tradition of Yule.

Whether or not Christmas has any connections or derivatives from Yule, it's interesting that Yule itself appears to originate from third-fourth century ᴬᴰ Christianised Germanic Goths; the very word of which is an abbreviated derivation of the Hebrew word Yu(bi)lee, of the exact same definition: celebration.

It's amazing what you find when, instead of just accepting what the (((media))) tells you at face value, you do your own research and dig a little.

Zeitgeist: Refutation and Debunking of the Religious Portion

Jesus Christ was born on the 25ᵗʰ of December, the other associations to this date are, by no surprise, fraudulent.

Ascension: Resurrection of the Body:
A short write-up on the resurrection of our bodies. A much overlooked and often forgotten Christian doctrine.

Updated Catechism, now to the standard exceeding Luther's Large Catechism.

This marks the completion of our Nicene Christianity foundation. The next additions to the Catechism will likely be racial theology.

Decided to make a new oc clip for the Christian Aryan Creed, which includes the newly written declaration explanations (at the end) to help understand the meaning and purpose behind each declaration.
There is however one change to the creed, the second declaration has the word Lord added as a greater sign of respect.

Links:
Catechism of Christian Aryanism.

First Clip.
YouTube.
BitChute.

Second Clip.
YouTube.

She will give birth to a son and will name him Jesus, for he will save his people [the White race]. ~Matthew 1:21

This day, over two thousand years ago, Christ was born (Dec 25ᵀᴴ, ᴬᴰ1) to save His people, the White race, against the ever encroaching darkness, the dark racial hordes; and today we still toil for the preservation of our race in His name.

Merry Christmas!

Today is the day to get together with friends and family, in racial communion, to celebrate the day the Lord walked among us, and remember what He did for us, His people.


Wishing you a Christmas season full of warmth, love, and family.
— Henry Reinhart, of Christian Aryanism

"I have been studying Christianity in the context of National Socialism for years. A few months ago I started translating things into English and sharing my work here on Telegram, which has reached thousands of people so far.
I do this because I see it as my duty as a German, as a National Socialist, and as a Christian to tell the world the truth about National Socialism. I do this out of deep love for my German people, because no other people, no other worldview and no leader in the world is lied about as much as we Germans.
I do this because my ancestors were all in the SS and were all great Christians. The blood of SS men flows through my veins and their spirit lives in my faith. Therefore, I see it as a divine and necessary task to refute the lies about National Socialism.
I have a deep faith in Christ, my King, and in Adolf Hitler, my Führer.
My final message for this year:
Keep this movement Christian!"

𝐓𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐯
The owner of Christianity and fascism on December 27, 2021.

@Christianityandfascism

Solus Genus: (Six Solas)

The White Race alone has the opportunity for Salvation. More appropriately designation Adamic Race alone [Romans 11:16; 1 Corinthians 15:22,45], however Adamkind has been scripturally and anthropologically identified as the White race today.

This has been identified with:—
¹ the etymology of Adam's name describing his complexion as hyperdepigmentised, white and translucent to show blood through the skin [Strongs Concordance H119-121].

² the phenotypical traits of Adamic people which are unique to the White race: hyperdepigmentised (white) complexion [1 Samuel 16:12. 17:42; Psalm 51:7; Song of Solomon 5:10,13-15. 7:4; Isaiah 29:22; Jeremiah 30:6; Lamentations 4:7; Revelation 1:14-16; Qu'ran(Sahih al-Bukhari 7128); Spurious(Genesis Apocryphon (1Q20) col 20); Spurious(1 Enoch 106.2)], brunet hair capable of being sun-bleached to blond [Song of Solomon 5:11], red hair [Genesis 25:25; 1 Samuel 16:12. 17:42; Lamentations 4:7], blond hair [Revelation 1:14-16; Patrologiæ Græca 120:191-194; Virgil Aeneid 4:590; Spurious(1 Enoch 106.2)], blue or green eyes [Song of Solomon 5:12. 7:4; Lamentations 4:7; Revelation 1:14-16; Patrologiæ Græca 120:191-194; Spurious(1 Enoch 106.2)].

³ the ability to digest lactose by Adamic people, especially in high densities such as cow diary (>4.8% lactose), a trait extremely rare among nonwhite populations but nearly universal among all Whites (>85%) and universal among Northern Europeans (>95%) [Genesis 18:8; Song of Solomom 5:1; Isaiah 7:22].

⁴ the etymology and origin of the word Arab (e'rab) which describes both “mixed mongrels” (miscegenated) and “to darken via mixing”, which infers that for an Adamic person to mix (miscegenation), would mean to darken their complexion, implying an originally pale complexion [Strongs Concordance H6148-6155].

⁵ the etymology and origin of the word Simian (simias) which means “snub/ flat nosed” a phenotypical trait absent from the White race yet universal among all nonwhites, which describes non-human primates (apes), yet is used as a pejorative (slur) against men and used in scripture when referring to foreign slaves shipped to Solomon [1 Kings 10:22; 2 Chronicles 9:21].

⁶ the identified location of the Garden of Eden (Adam's birthplace) which heavily corresponds to the identified location of the origin of Caucasians (White race's birthplace), both of which are located approximately in the same region of Northeastern Western-Asia, both definitively within a 350km radius of 39.05° 44.67°.

⁷ the Apostles of Jesus Christ, were sent to evangelize the entire Adamic world to Christianity, yet spread only to Europe and regions of North Africa and West Asia inhabited by Whites, spreading as far as 5177km from Jerusalem to Iceland, whilst completely neglecting nonwhite regions within a few hundred kilometres of Jerusalem.

⁸ the Judaeans, the central Adamic tribe, being racially indistinguishable from Ancient Greeks, a phenotypically-Nordic White tribe, and only distinguishable by circumcision [Josephus Antiquities 12:241].

⁹ the hundreds of various mosaics depicting Adamic peoples around Palestine with phenotypical traits unique to the White race, with notable mentions such as: Paleochristian 4ᵗʰ centuryᴬᴰ Caucasian Moses with swastika the crossing of the Red Sea - Catacomb of Via Latina Rome, 5ᵗʰ centuryᴬᴰ blond Alexander the Great and blond Maccabees - Huqoq site Israel, 4ᵗʰ centuryᴬᴰ blond Judaean slaves pouring wine in Roman Tunis - Tunis Tunisia North Africa.

¹⁰ various genetic studies, notably: PLoS Genetics, February 2013 (10.1371/journal.pgen.1003316 | 23468648) “We reconstructed the genetic structure of the Levantines and found that a pre-Islamic expansion Levant was more genetically similar to Europeans than to Middle Easterners.”; PLoS One, May 2016 (10.1371/journal.pone.0155046 | 27224451) “carried a rare European haplogroup… first direct ancient DNA evidence of a Phoenician individual… U5b2c2 sequences all originate in Central- and North-Western Europe… a young Phoenician man, with a European mitochondrial lineage.”

Sheldon Emry, Essays on Allegorical Satan:
This collection includes: That Old Serpent, The Satan Controversy, Give the Devil His Due.

These are some very old but great essays by Sheldon Emry, an important leader in Christian Identity and White Supremacist groups around the United States in the 80-90s.

We thankfully found these essays from an old archive and hope these will be profitable to your studies.

It is an official held position in Christian Aryanism that Satan is allegorical for Original Sin (human depravity) and for grand adversaries that universally threaten the entire race (nons, Jews). We wrote a little bit about this in our essay Original Sin.

Excerpt— Original Sin:

Although Augustine expressed that both evil did not exist [⁴⁵Augustine: Enchiridion 13] and that Satan was inconsequential to Adams sins [⁴³Augustine: Confessions 7:3.5]; he never stated in any surviving works regarding if Satan is substantial (real and tangible rather than imaginary or allegorical). Being consistent with Augustine's Theodicy, the ultimate conclusion of his Theodicy is that if evil does not exist and exists only as a consequence of human freewill and conception, and that Adam himself was at fault for his ownactions (reducing Satan's role as inconsequential), then Satan does not exist either and is allegorical.

Many hold onto the idea of Satan to justify the Problem of Evil, with the existence of evil but that doesn't solve the paradox, as God would know every action Satan would make past, present and future (omniscience) before Satan would have even been created; so this would still fall back on God as intentionally creating evil, even if you pass the creation and consequence of all evil onto a grand evil adversary such as Satan; as God would already know all the actions Satan would take. It is for this reason that even if Satan was a real entity and not allegorical, his existence would be as inconsequential and meaningless as a theatrical prop in a play.

Looking at the word Satan [⁴⁷Strongs Concordance H7854] we see the actual definition of the word is ❝adversary❞ and is at times labeled a Serpent [⁴⁶Strongs Concordance H5175] which has no greater meaning and is not used as a personal name; having it's definition to be quite literally a ❝snake❞ and used for actual snakes throughout scripture. In Greek an additional term Devil [⁴⁸Strongs Concordance G1228] appears which means ❝slanderous, accusing falsely❞. These terms serpent and devil are just descriptors and many other examples are found throughout scripture referring to Satan, such as the liar [¹⁶John 8:44], tempter [¹⁰Matthew 4:3], murderer [¹⁶John 8:44], evil one [¹¹Matthew 13:19], enemy [¹²Matthew 13:39], adversary [⁴⁰1 Peter 5:8] and deceiver [⁴¹Revelation 12:9]; some of these titles directly correspond to the literal definitions of satan (adversary) and devil (slanderer). What do all of these have in common? They're all bad human traits, behaviours, thoughts and actions.

It becomes clear that satan is a poetic idiom/ metaphor representing the personification of all inner human darkness and temptation, describing it as a literal ❝adversary❞, symbolized as a snake. Satan is not a real entity but an allegorical representation of Original Sin itself; Satan is ❝the tendency to evil innate in all human beings.❞ Eve was tempted and deceived by herself through the human nature that is Original Sin (Satan), and the same occurred for Adam.

Excerpt— Original Sin:

Although Augustine expressed that both evil did not exist [⁴⁵Augustine: Enchiridion 13] and that Satan was inconsequential to Adams sins [⁴³Augustine: Confessions 7:3.5]; he never stated in any surviving works regarding if Satan is substantial (real and tangible rather than imaginary or allegorical). Being consistent with Augustine's Theodicy, the ultimate conclusion of his Theodicy is that if evil does not exist and exists only as a consequence of human freewill and conception, and that Adam himself was at fault for his ownactions (reducing Satan's role as inconsequential), then Satan does not exist either and is allegorical.

Many hold onto the idea of Satan to justify the Problem of Evil, with the existence of evil but that doesn't solve the paradox, as God would know every action Satan would make past, present and future (omniscience) before Satan would have even been created; so this would still fall back on God as intentionally creating evil, even if you pass the creation and consequence of all evil onto a grand evil adversary such as Satan; as God would already know all the actions Satan would take. It is for this reason that even if Satan was a real entity and not allegorical, his existence would be as inconsequential and meaningless as a theatrical prop in a play.

Looking at the word Satan [⁴⁷Strongs Concordance H7854] we see the actual definition of the word is ❝adversary❞ and is at times labeled a Serpent [⁴⁶Strongs Concordance H5175] which has no greater meaning and is not used as a personal name; having it's definition to be quite literally a ❝snake❞ and used for actual snakes throughout scripture. In Greek an additional term Devil [⁴⁸Strongs Concordance G1228] appears which means ❝slanderous, accusing falsely❞. These terms serpent and devil are just descriptors and many other examples are found throughout scripture referring to Satan, such as the liar [¹⁶John 8:44], tempter [¹⁰Matthew 4:3], murderer [¹⁶John 8:44], evil one [¹¹Matthew 13:19], enemy [¹²Matthew 13:39], adversary [⁴⁰1 Peter 5:8] and deceiver [⁴¹Revelation 12:9]; some of these titles directly correspond to the literal definitions of satan (adversary) and devil (slanderer). What do all of these have in common? They're all bad human traits, behaviours, thoughts and actions.

It becomes clear that satan is a poetic idiom/ metaphor representing the personification of all inner human darkness and temptation, describing it as a literal ❝adversary❞, symbolized as a snake. Satan is not a real entity but an allegorical representation of Original Sin itself; Satan is ❝the tendency to evil innate in all human beings.❞ Eve was tempted and deceived by herself through the human nature that is Original Sin (Satan), and the same occurred for Adam.

I'll bring up the lesson of Job 1-2.

The book of Job is a Sapiential book, which literally means "Wisdom Book". It's not a historical narrative. The narrative of Job chapter 1-2 is a lesson on selflessness. That you love and obey God NOT because you are promised a good life or promised an afterlife, BUT because you love Him unconditionally. So what is presented is the hypothetical where a man is stripped of everything by God Himself, but still loves him.
The lesson is unconditional and selfless love for God. Actually a very important and beautiful lesson.

This is much like the test given to Abraham, of unconditional and selfless trust and loyalty to God, that he would sacrifice his own son Isaac because God said so. Obviously God doesn't want anything bad to happen to either of them, so once God has demonstrated Abraham's unlimited loyalty, He stops him; just the same as why God would never do to anyone, what occurred to Job.


The lesson in Job chapters 1-2 is that you should love God selflessly, not because you are promised a good life, or because you're promised an afterlife.
You should simply love God, even if your life was torment and you knew only fire awaited you in the afterlife.

This won't occur for you, but that's why the hypothetical scenario is developed and explored in those chapters.

Your faith and love of God shouldn't be dependant on things you can benefit from, or promises of things you can receive.
Your faith and love of God should be unconditional.

Christian Identity—

There's been a recent decline in Christian Identity on Telegram, fuelled by splintering, turncoats, betrayal and disunion between internal factions who don't see each other as part of the same religion.

While some of the larger factions such as Christogenea and Christian Aryanism have been unscathed by this decline, it's left all those inbetween, the majority, who don't quite fit into either group: lonely, disconnected and straying into obscure cults who prey on the atomised White man.

It is for these reasons this channel has been created, to: provide a common ground among Christian Identity, promote unity, facilitate growth and create surviving long-term real-life communities.
We will additionally host a private archive channel to collect and preserve CI essays and resources lost in time due to death, shutdown of websites and erasure by Jewish occupied governments.

We invite all Christian Identitarians to participate in the discussion on Orthodox Christian Identity.

Christian Aryanism is here to stay and will not be changing, just to remove any doubts you may have.

Christian Aryanism will maintain it's autonomy and distinction as a unique, independent and strong group; as we would expect any other group under Christian Identity.

The purpose of this isn't to change, compromise our beliefs nor join something else, but to: recognise we are part of a greater community, Christian Identity; to be part of the discussion on what is considered Christian Identity; and to facilitate unity, cooperation and growth across all Racial Christian groups.

There is too much infighting and disrespect among Christian groups that all understand the fundamental that only White people matter in Christianity, and open ourselves up to attack from the non-Christians and non-Whites alike. This needs to end.

This recognised unity can be considered something akin to Protestantism, while there are many Protestant groups within, such as Lutheranism, Anglicanism, Calvinism, etc; there are many Identity groups within Christian Identity, Christian Aryanism being one of them.
We can focus on and promote what unites us, while respecting our theological differences.

We will still remain steadfast in our beliefs, but we will do so united, in both Faith and in Race.

Fides Et Gens.
—Henry Reinhart.