Nephilim? Giants, Angels or Men?

Most Christian theologians throughout all of history interpreted that the Nephilim of the bible were the mixed progeny of the sons of Seth who took wives from the daughters of Cain. Martin Luther was no exception who had the following remarks to make:

The 'daughters of men' were the 'daughters of Cain'¹⁰¹ and the 'sons of God' were the 'sons of Adam'³². Named 'of God' for their lineage as the pure pious blessed seed³², and the other named 'of men' for being outside this lineage, known for their impious, ungodly ways¹¹¹ and their bestial²⁷ lust and desires. Luther rejected what he called Jewish fables³³ which claimed sons of God signified something celestial. The claimed large stature of Nephilim is a misinterpretation¹²¹; in Numbers 13:33 they are called giants not due to the bulk of their body¹²³, but due to their nature as brute violent oppressors¹²⁴ (tyrants) without law nor honour¹²³, only indulging their pleasure and desire¹²³, who prey upon those beneath them¹²³. The patriarchs had strictly forbidden to contract alliances with the offspring of Cain³⁰, as not to taint the nature of the sons of God via their mingling with the accursed generation of Cain³¹.

Ref: Correspond to indexes in Luther's Works Vol. 2, Commentary On Genesis 1-6.

"In prohibiting marriage with the Cainites it was the chief purpose of the pious fathers to maintain their generation pure." ~ Martin Luther ¹⁰³.

-
Often claimed Ge 6:2,4 "sons of God" is Angels by claiming Jb 1:6.2:1 matches. However doesn't match DSS LXX LV, only corrupted MT. However does match DSS-4Q37 LXX LV De 32:8 in reference to Israelites.
-

What is the underlying reason for the Cainites savage behavour? Is it merely their improper ways or is there a fundamental reason behind it?
Previously I have spoken on this, which I stated, the descendants of Cain were largely racially mixed with humanoid fauna (Preadamites), thus are more predisposed to act in animalistic ways than their Adamic counterparts; and this is the underlying reason their mingling would corrupt. If both were wholly of the same stock, would they just not merely raise their crossed offspring together to be pious? Would this justify God to flood the Adamic world and genocide them all? If it was simply their character which was unholy, it would only make sense for God to set out the pious to evangelise the impious, not eradicate them.

It is clear they were of tainted biological stock, which we can see in scripture. Cain, a pure descendant of Adam, in exile took a wife [Gen. 4:17], however no other humans except Adam, Eve and Cain existed at this time (Abel was already murdered [Gen. 4:8]). Seth would not be born until [Gen. 4:25] and Adam's other numerous progeny not until [Gen. 5:4]. The only conclusion is Cain's wife was completely outside their lineage, his wife was humanoid fauna (nonwhite).

We see the descendants of Cain took pure Adamic spouses later on in history [Gen. 6], which likely aided in the bleaching of many Cainites and the expression of recessive genes such as pale complexion and their increased beauty; which unfortunately made them more acceptable to Adamites [Gen. 6:2].

"The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose." Gen. 6:2

(H2896→טבת→tbth→lit. good; fig. pleasant to sight, fair. G2570→καλαί→kalai→lit. good; fig. beautiful, fair. L×→pvlchrae→lit. beautiful, fair; fig. noble. E×→fair→light complexion)

It is interesting the English translators chose the word fair (lit. light complexion), and it may seem like conjecture to claim they were literally seen as pale skinned to the Sethites, however it definitely says they appeared physically attractive enough (which is often synonymous with light complexion) to take as wives; which would be a product of higher Adamic admixture.

While they appeared Adamic (White) enough to Sethites to wed; did God think so as well?
No, God flooded the entire Adamic world to eradicate them. You can never bleach nonwhites enough to be acceptable in the eyes of God.

Phenotype of King David:
King David, direct ancestor of Jesus, is described biblically as "ʼadmônîy" in Hebrew and "RVFVS" in Latin; both of which mean fair-skinned (showing blood through skin) and red-haired.

1 Samuel 16:12
¹² And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he.

1 Samuel 17:42
⁴² And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance.

H132: ʼadmônîy; L×: Rufus.

Strongs Concordance:
¹³² #H0132 : אַדְמֹנִי : ʼadmônîy : {ad-mo-nee’} : or (fully) אַדְמוֹנִי ʼadmôwnîy ; from H119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion):—red, ruddy.

Latin:
rūfus (f rūfa, n rūfum); first/second-declension adjective. ¹ red, reddish, ruddy. ² redheaded, red-haired


Image: Statue of King David (ᴬᴰ1609–1612) by Nicolas Cordier in the Borghese Chapel of the Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, Italy

The Beit Alfa Synagogue was constructed in the sixth-centuryᴬᴰ, in a small village situated in the northern foothills of Mt. Giboa.

The community that built it were most likely Israelites (≠🇮🇱) that either escaped Jerusalem's destruction or were already isolated there... which would explain why they're depicted fair-skinned with blond hair, alongside Hebraic inscriptions, in many of the interior mosaics.

Any Israelite remnant in the area has since been wiped out by Muslim expansion in the following centuries.

@adamicenlightenment

2 Timothy 1:7
⁷ ɴᴏɴ ᴇɴɪᴍ ᴅᴇᴅɪᴛ ɴᴏʙɪs ᴅ‌̅ᴇ‌̅ᴠ‌̅s‌̅ s‌̅ᴘ‌̅ɪ‌̅ʀ‌̅ɪ‌̅ᴛ‌̅ᴠ‌̅ᴍ‌̅ ᴛɪᴍᴏʀɪs: sᴇᴅ ᴠɪʀᴛᴠᴛɪs, ᴇᴛ ᴅɪʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴɪs, ᴇᴛ sᴏʙʀɪᴇᴛᴀᴛɪs
⁷ For God has not given us the spirit of fear: but of power, and love, and sobriety.

@ChristianAryanism

My response to the Catholics

The statement that is talked about in the text [Link]

@Christianityandfascism

High Resolution, link to post.

The LORD gave one man alone a soul, only he and his progeny contain that precious spark.
The beasts before him plague his people like literal demons ready to consume them, in endless dark hordes.
The White race must hold back the night, for they are the LORDs light upon the world.


Genesis 2:7
The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

John 3:5-6
Jesus answered, verily, verily, i say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. that which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the spirit is spirit.

[High Resolution of OC]

Recent Questions:
Got flooded with these few questions from many people, so I'll go through them for everyone!

1. "Source for the quote in the previous post?"
It was just made up on the spot, nothing fancy.

2. "Is that a new logo in the previous post?"
I see you saw the new logo in the corner and I'm extremely happy you noticed! I decided the logo needed to be revamped and I think I hit the nail on the head with this one! Attached is a high res and transparent copy. I also updated the stickerpack to include this which I'll post after.

3. "Is the Codex Amiatinus project still active?"
Of course! I still make regular updates at https://github.com/hansel-reinhart/codex-amiatinus as well and you can still chat and join in at @CodexAmiatinus!

4. "Is there a Christian Aryanism chat?"
Yes, the vetting group is linked to this channel. You can also message me directly at @HenryReinhart for vetting or even just questions! Or alternatively, there's the public @XPGram chat.

Check out other channels at @OWLM_Network!

Translation Projects:

We continue with Codex Amiatinus but we are now announcing our second project that has been planned for sometime now, Die Botschaft Gottes!

Die Botschaft Gottes, which we will refer to as Volkstestament is an ᴬᴰ1940 Bible published by the Deutsch Christians of Nazi Germany, making it the only official Reich translation of the bible.

This will not be "official canon", as we know in the Reich's unfortunately short period of life, they made many grave scholarly biblical mistakes, which they would have corrected, if they were afforded more time. Instead we see this as a great insight into the mind of the living and breathing National Socialists and how they viewed Christianity; making it an invaluable source of NS scholarship.

This project is being undertaken as a cooperation between @ChristianAryanism, @ChristianityAndFascism and @AdamicEnlightenment (image creator).
Be sure to sub to all!

-----
If you would like to assist in either of the projects, join the groupchat! Lurkers welcome!

Depictions of demons from The Codex Aureus of Echternach (Codex aureus Epternacensis), an illuminated Gospel Book created in the approximate period ᴬᴰ1030–1050.

Note the negroidal features of the demons.

Phenotype of King Solomon:
Described biblically with the following phenotypical traits:
—¹white/ ²ruddy complexion.
—³golden head with ⁵dark ⁴forelocks.
—⁶water-coloured eyes.

Complexion is clearly shown as hyperdepigmentized.
Head/ hair is described golden with dark forelocks (roots), which suggests sun-bleached hair. Black coloured hair cannot be noticeably bleached by the sun, however dark-brown can easily be bleached by the sun to even blond. Solomon was brunet.
Eyes are described like water surrounded by doves and milk, which suggest light-blue iris with a bright white sclera.

Song Of Solomon 5:10-12
¹⁰ My beloved is ¹white and ²ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.
¹¹ His head is as the most fine ³gold, his ⁴locks are bushy, and ⁵black as a raven.
¹² His eyes are as the eyes of doves by the rivers of ⁶waters, washed with milk, and fitly set.

References:
¹ H6703: white.
² H0122: rosy, ruddy.
³ H6337: fine (pure) gold.
⁴ H6977: forelock.
⁵ H7838: dusky, jetty.
⁶ H4325: water.

Codex Amiatinus Project Update:

At the beginning of this year, we started the Codex Amiatinus project. An ambitious project to revive an ancient biblical manuscript and translate it to colloquial English, which would revive the racial connotations which were once standard.

For the first few months, we had nearly 40 contributors helping transcribe the Latin text of 2059 pages in the Codex!
Thanks to the efforts of these people completing this stage, we were able to use their transcriptions to computer generate nearly 36,000 markers which correspond exact bible indexes to an exact page number & column!
This stage allowed us to generate these markers and use them to generate an entire Latin bible based on existing digital text with correct punctuation.

We are now at the next stage.
We are looking for volunteers to go over the pages once more, to make corrections to our generated text, and apply formatting.

If interested, have a read of the attached manual & join @CodexAmiatinus to ask for available pages!

The next stage of the Codex Amiatinus is commencing!
https://t.iss.one/AryanAnthropology/176

This stage involves proof reading text, making corrections and applying formatting to the listed standard!

If you're interested, join the @CodexAmiatinus group chat and ask for some available page allocations!

Many hands, make light work, be sure to lend yours.

Announcement:
We have put together @PalaeographyBot for the Codex Amiatinus and Volkstestament projects!

This bot will make transcribing the manuscript much easier. Simply:
- See what's available with /availability
- Request page with /get
- Correct the text file given.
- Send corrected text file with /submit

For newcomers, I recommend first using /practice to be given a test page/ transcription to correct, which the bot will score you on.

If you have any further questions, or any troubles, either comment them on this post or join the group chat.

Are Our Views On Salvation Different From The Churches?
(Specifically on beneficiaries)

No they aren't. There is no difference theologically between our views and the standard views of the Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox, etc, churches.
It is held by all Churches, and it also scripturally sound, that the opportunity for salvation is with Adamic life alone. This is why you hear from Church that fauna and flora don't go to heaven, because they are not Adamic life.

However there is one difference between us, not theologically, but with the identification of Adamic life itself.

Churches today arbitrarily identify Adam as the most recent common ancestor of all living homonids. A socially constructed, ahistorical claim with no basis in scripture; conforming to the modern ideas of humanism we see plaguing our academic community today.

An example of this arbitrary proclamation is with, "Y-chromosomal" Adam, defined as "the patrilineal most recent common ancestor from whom all currently living humans are descended". A definition socially constructed to be just broad enough to include all hominids today.

The Church today identifies Adamic life identically to this, which excludes extinct hominids based purely on that metric, but would include them if they were alive; making Adamic life completely subjective to them. Which is a nonsensical way to define Adamic life; as Adam was a man with descendants, thus Adamic life is objective.

So what would happen if we were to instead identify Adamic life objectively with scripture and anthropology? The way it was meant to be:
—You would find that Adamic life would be solely identified as Caucasian.
—Leaving the opportunity for salvation with Caucasians alone (this isn't the only requirement).
—Specifically the only remaining pure Caucasians, Europeans and their diaspora (Whites).

This identification isn't a doctrine unique to a particular denomination, but is a fundamental truth, impacting all Christians. The implication of which is:
Only Whites can be Catholic.
Only Whites can be Orthodox.
Only Whites can be Protestant.
and so on.

The very reality of Christianity is simple:
Only Whites can be Christian, and we must safeguard both our faith and race from the dark foreign hordes.

It is no coincidence the origin of the Caucasian people (White race), finds itself precisely at the Garden of Eden.

Race of Europeans, race from across the mountains, race, beloved and elected by God as shines forth in many of your works.
Gens ¹Francorum, gens transmontana, gens, sicut in pluribus vestris elucet operibus, a Deo dilecta et electa.

~ Pope Urban II's Speech at the Council of Clermont, ᴬᴰ1095: calling for the First Crusade, addressing Europeans as the sole people of God (Historia Hierosolymitana).

--------
¹ Francorum (Francus/ Frank) at this time had become very generic and referred to all Western Europeans, due to the former Frankish Empire.
Comparable to lingua franca (Frankish language), referring to a common Western European pidgin language, now simply common language.

Because of this, cognates of the word Frank, are terms meaning Christian, European or White in the muslim world from the Middle East to South Asia.
Ifranji (Arabic إفرنجي White)— Farang (Persian فرنگ White, Crusader, European)— Firangi (Hindi फ़िरंगी White)— Bharangi (Burmese ဘရင်ဂျီ Christian, Caucasian)— Farang (Thai ฝรั่ง Westerner)