Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
View on Preterism and Futurism?
Send thoughts and opinions in the comments. It's a rather controversial topic, so please be respectful of each other. There will be a video on each position in the comments.
Send thoughts and opinions in the comments. It's a rather controversial topic, so please be respectful of each other. There will be a video on each position in the comments.
Anonymous Poll
15%
Full Preterist (All biblical prophecy was fulfilled by 70ᴬᴰ)
43%
Partial Preterist (Most was fulfilled, but some still to pass)
42%
Futurist (Most still to come)
Forwarded from Deleted Account
Preterist but I think it's cyclical. Also by no means a scholar.
Forwarded from Church of Restored Puritanism (Henry)
Now that's an interesting position. Do you mind elaborating?
Forwarded from Church of Restored Puritanism (Henry)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Full Preterism (All biblical prophecy was fulfilled by 70ᴬᴰ)
The History of Full Preterism by Todd Dennis 2007
The History of Full Preterism by Todd Dennis 2007
Forwarded from Church of Restored Puritanism (Henry)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Partial Preterism (Most was fulfilled, but some still to pass)
Unpacking the Tribulation: An Introduction to Preterism
Unpacking the Tribulation: An Introduction to Preterism
Forwarded from Deleted Account
Well, like I said I'm not really a scholar but as long as the Jews continue to be Jews and refuse the Christ there will always be tribulations or pogroms as they call it.
Forwarded from Church of Restored Puritanism (Henry)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Futurism (Most still to come)
A "Rationale" for Futurism: A Future Tribulation and Daniel's 70th Week
A "Rationale" for Futurism: A Future Tribulation and Daniel's 70th Week
Forwarded from ᴀᴅᴀᴍɪᴄ ᴇɴʟɪɢʜᴛᴇɴᴍᴇɴᴛ
Job 12:7-10
But ask the beasts, and they will teach you; the birds of the heavens, and they will tell you; or the bushes of the earth, and they will teach you; and the fish of the sea will declare to you. Who among all these does not know that the hand of the Lord has done this? In his hand is the life of every living thing and the breath of all mankind.
Christians are to have a deep respect for nature which proclaims the glory of our Heavenly Father.
@adamicenlightenment
But ask the beasts, and they will teach you; the birds of the heavens, and they will tell you; or the bushes of the earth, and they will teach you; and the fish of the sea will declare to you. Who among all these does not know that the hand of the Lord has done this? In his hand is the life of every living thing and the breath of all mankind.
Christians are to have a deep respect for nature which proclaims the glory of our Heavenly Father.
@adamicenlightenment
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Nephilim? Giants, Angels or Men?
Most Christian theologians throughout all of history interpreted that the Nephilim of the bible were the mixed progeny of the sons of Seth who took wives from the daughters of Cain. Martin Luther was no exception who had the following remarks to make:
The 'daughters of men' were the 'daughters of Cain'¹⁰¹ and the 'sons of God' were the 'sons of Adam'³². Named 'of God' for their lineage as the pure pious blessed seed³², and the other named 'of men' for being outside this lineage, known for their impious, ungodly ways¹¹¹ and their bestial²⁷ lust and desires. Luther rejected what he called Jewish fables³³ which claimed sons of God signified something celestial. The claimed large stature of Nephilim is a misinterpretation¹²¹; in Numbers 13:33 they are called giants not due to the bulk of their body¹²³, but due to their nature as brute violent oppressors¹²⁴ (tyrants) without law nor honour¹²³, only indulging their pleasure and desire¹²³, who prey upon those beneath them¹²³. The patriarchs had strictly forbidden to contract alliances with the offspring of Cain³⁰, as not to taint the nature of the sons of God via their mingling with the accursed generation of Cain³¹.
Ref: Correspond to indexes in Luther's Works Vol. 2, Commentary On Genesis 1-6.
"In prohibiting marriage with the Cainites it was the chief purpose of the pious fathers to maintain their generation pure." ~ Martin Luther ¹⁰³.
Often claimed Ge 6:2,4 "sons of God" is Angels by claiming Jb 1:6.2:1 matches. However doesn't match DSS LXX LV, only corrupted MT. However does match DSS-4Q37 LXX LV De 32:8 in reference to Israelites.
What is the underlying reason for the Cainites savage behavour? Is it merely their improper ways or is there a fundamental reason behind it?
Previously I have spoken on this, which I stated, the descendants of Cain were largely racially mixed with humanoid fauna (Preadamites), thus are more predisposed to act in animalistic ways than their Adamic counterparts; and this is the underlying reason their mingling would corrupt. If both were wholly of the same stock, would they just not merely raise their crossed offspring together to be pious? Would this justify God to flood the Adamic world and genocide them all? If it was simply their character which was unholy, it would only make sense for God to set out the pious to evangelise the impious, not eradicate them.
It is clear they were of tainted biological stock, which we can see in scripture. Cain, a pure descendant of Adam, in exile took a wife [Gen. 4:17], however no other humans except Adam, Eve and Cain existed at this time (Abel was already murdered [Gen. 4:8]). Seth would not be born until [Gen. 4:25] and Adam's other numerous progeny not until [Gen. 5:4]. The only conclusion is Cain's wife was completely outside their lineage, his wife was humanoid fauna (nonwhite).
We see the descendants of Cain took pure Adamic spouses later on in history [Gen. 6], which likely aided in the bleaching of many Cainites and the expression of recessive genes such as pale complexion and their increased beauty; which unfortunately made them more acceptable to Adamites [Gen. 6:2].
"The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose." Gen. 6:2
(H2896→טבת→tbth→lit. good; fig. pleasant to sight, fair. G2570→καλαί→kalai→lit. good; fig. beautiful, fair. L×→pvlchrae→lit. beautiful, fair; fig. noble. E×→fair→light complexion)
It is interesting the English translators chose the word fair (lit. light complexion), and it may seem like conjecture to claim they were literally seen as pale skinned to the Sethites, however it definitely says they appeared physically attractive enough (which is often synonymous with light complexion) to take as wives; which would be a product of higher Adamic admixture.
While they appeared Adamic (White) enough to Sethites to wed; did God think so as well?
No, God flooded the entire Adamic world to eradicate them. You can never bleach nonwhites enough to be acceptable in the eyes of God.
Most Christian theologians throughout all of history interpreted that the Nephilim of the bible were the mixed progeny of the sons of Seth who took wives from the daughters of Cain. Martin Luther was no exception who had the following remarks to make:
The 'daughters of men' were the 'daughters of Cain'¹⁰¹ and the 'sons of God' were the 'sons of Adam'³². Named 'of God' for their lineage as the pure pious blessed seed³², and the other named 'of men' for being outside this lineage, known for their impious, ungodly ways¹¹¹ and their bestial²⁷ lust and desires. Luther rejected what he called Jewish fables³³ which claimed sons of God signified something celestial. The claimed large stature of Nephilim is a misinterpretation¹²¹; in Numbers 13:33 they are called giants not due to the bulk of their body¹²³, but due to their nature as brute violent oppressors¹²⁴ (tyrants) without law nor honour¹²³, only indulging their pleasure and desire¹²³, who prey upon those beneath them¹²³. The patriarchs had strictly forbidden to contract alliances with the offspring of Cain³⁰, as not to taint the nature of the sons of God via their mingling with the accursed generation of Cain³¹.
Ref: Correspond to indexes in Luther's Works Vol. 2, Commentary On Genesis 1-6.
"In prohibiting marriage with the Cainites it was the chief purpose of the pious fathers to maintain their generation pure." ~ Martin Luther ¹⁰³.
-Often claimed Ge 6:2,4 "sons of God" is Angels by claiming Jb 1:6.2:1 matches. However doesn't match DSS LXX LV, only corrupted MT. However does match DSS-4Q37 LXX LV De 32:8 in reference to Israelites.
-What is the underlying reason for the Cainites savage behavour? Is it merely their improper ways or is there a fundamental reason behind it?
Previously I have spoken on this, which I stated, the descendants of Cain were largely racially mixed with humanoid fauna (Preadamites), thus are more predisposed to act in animalistic ways than their Adamic counterparts; and this is the underlying reason their mingling would corrupt. If both were wholly of the same stock, would they just not merely raise their crossed offspring together to be pious? Would this justify God to flood the Adamic world and genocide them all? If it was simply their character which was unholy, it would only make sense for God to set out the pious to evangelise the impious, not eradicate them.
It is clear they were of tainted biological stock, which we can see in scripture. Cain, a pure descendant of Adam, in exile took a wife [Gen. 4:17], however no other humans except Adam, Eve and Cain existed at this time (Abel was already murdered [Gen. 4:8]). Seth would not be born until [Gen. 4:25] and Adam's other numerous progeny not until [Gen. 5:4]. The only conclusion is Cain's wife was completely outside their lineage, his wife was humanoid fauna (nonwhite).
We see the descendants of Cain took pure Adamic spouses later on in history [Gen. 6], which likely aided in the bleaching of many Cainites and the expression of recessive genes such as pale complexion and their increased beauty; which unfortunately made them more acceptable to Adamites [Gen. 6:2].
"The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose." Gen. 6:2
(H2896→טבת→tbth→lit. good; fig. pleasant to sight, fair. G2570→καλαί→kalai→lit. good; fig. beautiful, fair. L×→pvlchrae→lit. beautiful, fair; fig. noble. E×→fair→light complexion)
It is interesting the English translators chose the word fair (lit. light complexion), and it may seem like conjecture to claim they were literally seen as pale skinned to the Sethites, however it definitely says they appeared physically attractive enough (which is often synonymous with light complexion) to take as wives; which would be a product of higher Adamic admixture.
While they appeared Adamic (White) enough to Sethites to wed; did God think so as well?
No, God flooded the entire Adamic world to eradicate them. You can never bleach nonwhites enough to be acceptable in the eyes of God.
❤2🔥2
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Phenotype of King David:
King David, direct ancestor of Jesus, is described biblically as "ʼadmônîy" in Hebrew and "RVFVS" in Latin; both of which mean fair-skinned (showing blood through skin) and red-haired.
1 Samuel 16:12
¹² And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he.
1 Samuel 17:42
⁴² And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance.
H132: ʼadmônîy; L×: Rufus.
Strongs Concordance:
¹³² #H0132 : אַדְמֹנִי : ʼadmônîy : {ad-mo-nee’} : or (fully) אַדְמוֹנִי ʼadmôwnîy ; from H119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion):—red, ruddy.
Latin:
rūfus (f rūfa, n rūfum); first/second-declension adjective. ¹ red, reddish, ruddy. ² redheaded, red-haired
Image: Statue of King David (ᴬᴰ1609–1612) by Nicolas Cordier in the Borghese Chapel of the Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, Italy
King David, direct ancestor of Jesus, is described biblically as "ʼadmônîy" in Hebrew and "RVFVS" in Latin; both of which mean fair-skinned (showing blood through skin) and red-haired.
1 Samuel 16:12
¹² And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he.
1 Samuel 17:42
⁴² And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance.
H132: ʼadmônîy; L×: Rufus.
Strongs Concordance:
¹³² #H0132 : אַדְמֹנִי : ʼadmônîy : {ad-mo-nee’} : or (fully) אַדְמוֹנִי ʼadmôwnîy ; from H119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion):—red, ruddy.
Latin:
rūfus (f rūfa, n rūfum); first/second-declension adjective. ¹ red, reddish, ruddy. ² redheaded, red-haired
Image: Statue of King David (ᴬᴰ1609–1612) by Nicolas Cordier in the Borghese Chapel of the Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, Italy
🥰1
Forwarded from ᴀᴅᴀᴍɪᴄ ᴇɴʟɪɢʜᴛᴇɴᴍᴇɴᴛ
The Beit Alfa Synagogue was constructed in the sixth-centuryᴬᴰ, in a small village situated in the northern foothills of Mt. Giboa.
The community that built it were most likely Israelites (≠🇮🇱) that either escaped Jerusalem's destruction or were already isolated there... which would explain why they're depicted fair-skinned with blond hair, alongside Hebraic inscriptions, in many of the interior mosaics.
Any Israelite remnant in the area has since been wiped out by Muslim expansion in the following centuries.
@adamicenlightenment
The community that built it were most likely Israelites (≠🇮🇱) that either escaped Jerusalem's destruction or were already isolated there... which would explain why they're depicted fair-skinned with blond hair, alongside Hebraic inscriptions, in many of the interior mosaics.
Any Israelite remnant in the area has since been wiped out by Muslim expansion in the following centuries.
@adamicenlightenment
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
2 Timothy 1:7
⁷ ɴᴏɴ ᴇɴɪᴍ ᴅᴇᴅɪᴛ ɴᴏʙɪs ᴅ̅ᴇ̅ᴠ̅s̅ s̅ᴘ̅ɪ̅ʀ̅ɪ̅ᴛ̅ᴠ̅ᴍ̅ ᴛɪᴍᴏʀɪs: sᴇᴅ ᴠɪʀᴛᴠᴛɪs, ᴇᴛ ᴅɪʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴɪs, ᴇᴛ sᴏʙʀɪᴇᴛᴀᴛɪs
⁷ For God has not given us the spirit of fear: but of power, and love, and sobriety.
@ChristianAryanism
⁷ ɴᴏɴ ᴇɴɪᴍ ᴅᴇᴅɪᴛ ɴᴏʙɪs ᴅ̅ᴇ̅ᴠ̅s̅ s̅ᴘ̅ɪ̅ʀ̅ɪ̅ᴛ̅ᴠ̅ᴍ̅ ᴛɪᴍᴏʀɪs: sᴇᴅ ᴠɪʀᴛᴠᴛɪs, ᴇᴛ ᴅɪʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴɪs, ᴇᴛ sᴏʙʀɪᴇᴛᴀᴛɪs
⁷ For God has not given us the spirit of fear: but of power, and love, and sobriety.
@ChristianAryanism
💯1
Forwarded from -
My response to the Catholics
The statement that is talked about in the text [Link]
@Christianityandfascism
The statement that is talked about in the text [Link]
@Christianityandfascism
Telegraph
My response to Catholics
Some Catholics did not get along with my last message. I was accused of hating Catholicism, of being secretly Protestant or Christian Identity. First, I do not tolerate anyone calling me a CI Christian or any other denomination. I am a Catholic, and proudly…
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
20210922soul.png
2.4 MB
High Resolution, link to post.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
The LORD gave one man alone a soul, only he and his progeny contain that precious spark.
The beasts before him plague his people like literal demons ready to consume them, in endless dark hordes.
The White race must hold back the night, for they are the LORDs light upon the world.
Genesis 2:7
The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
John 3:5-6
Jesus answered, verily, verily, i say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. that which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the spirit is spirit.
[High Resolution of OC]
The beasts before him plague his people like literal demons ready to consume them, in endless dark hordes.
The White race must hold back the night, for they are the LORDs light upon the world.
Genesis 2:7
The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
John 3:5-6
Jesus answered, verily, verily, i say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. that which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the spirit is spirit.
[High Resolution of OC]
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
20210922logo.png
51.8 KB
Recent Questions:
Got flooded with these few questions from many people, so I'll go through them for everyone!
1. "Source for the quote in the previous post?"
It was just made up on the spot, nothing fancy.
2. "Is that a new logo in the previous post?"
I see you saw the new logo in the corner and I'm extremely happy you noticed! I decided the logo needed to be revamped and I think I hit the nail on the head with this one! Attached is a high res and transparent copy. I also updated the stickerpack to include this which I'll post after.
3. "Is the Codex Amiatinus project still active?"
Of course! I still make regular updates at https://github.com/hansel-reinhart/codex-amiatinus as well and you can still chat and join in at @CodexAmiatinus!
4. "Is there a Christian Aryanism chat?"
Yes, the vetting group is linked to this channel. You can also message me directly at @HenryReinhart for vetting or even just questions! Or alternatively, there's the public @XPGram chat.
Check out other channels at @OWLM_Network!
Got flooded with these few questions from many people, so I'll go through them for everyone!
1. "Source for the quote in the previous post?"
It was just made up on the spot, nothing fancy.
2. "Is that a new logo in the previous post?"
I see you saw the new logo in the corner and I'm extremely happy you noticed! I decided the logo needed to be revamped and I think I hit the nail on the head with this one! Attached is a high res and transparent copy. I also updated the stickerpack to include this which I'll post after.
3. "Is the Codex Amiatinus project still active?"
Of course! I still make regular updates at https://github.com/hansel-reinhart/codex-amiatinus as well and you can still chat and join in at @CodexAmiatinus!
4. "Is there a Christian Aryanism chat?"
Yes, the vetting group is linked to this channel. You can also message me directly at @HenryReinhart for vetting or even just questions! Or alternatively, there's the public @XPGram chat.
Check out other channels at @OWLM_Network!
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤1
Forwarded from Faith And Folk
Translation Projects:
We continue with Codex Amiatinus but we are now announcing our second project that has been planned for sometime now, Die Botschaft Gottes!
Die Botschaft Gottes, which we will refer to as Volkstestament is an ᴬᴰ1940 Bible published by the Deutsch Christians of Nazi Germany, making it the only official Reich translation of the bible.
This will not be "official canon", as we know in the Reich's unfortunately short period of life, they made many grave scholarly biblical mistakes, which they would have corrected, if they were afforded more time. Instead we see this as a great insight into the mind of the living and breathing National Socialists and how they viewed Christianity; making it an invaluable source of NS scholarship.
This project is being undertaken as a cooperation between @ChristianAryanism, @ChristianityAndFascism and @AdamicEnlightenment (image creator).
Be sure to sub to all!
If you would like to assist in either of the projects, join the groupchat! Lurkers welcome!
We continue with Codex Amiatinus but we are now announcing our second project that has been planned for sometime now, Die Botschaft Gottes!
Die Botschaft Gottes, which we will refer to as Volkstestament is an ᴬᴰ1940 Bible published by the Deutsch Christians of Nazi Germany, making it the only official Reich translation of the bible.
This will not be "official canon", as we know in the Reich's unfortunately short period of life, they made many grave scholarly biblical mistakes, which they would have corrected, if they were afforded more time. Instead we see this as a great insight into the mind of the living and breathing National Socialists and how they viewed Christianity; making it an invaluable source of NS scholarship.
This project is being undertaken as a cooperation between @ChristianAryanism, @ChristianityAndFascism and @AdamicEnlightenment (image creator).
Be sure to sub to all!
-----If you would like to assist in either of the projects, join the groupchat! Lurkers welcome!
Forwarded from ᴀᴅᴀᴍɪᴄ ᴇɴʟɪɢʜᴛᴇɴᴍᴇɴᴛ
"From the first mountain, which was black, they that believed are the following: apostates and blasphemers against the Lord, and betrayers of the servants of God. To these repentance is not open; but death lies before them, and on this account also are they black, for their race is a lawless one."
The Shepherd of Hermas (c. ᴬᴰ90)
Book III, Chapter XIX
The Shepherd of Hermas (c. ᴬᴰ90)
Book III, Chapter XIX
Forwarded from ᴀᴅᴀᴍɪᴄ ᴇɴʟɪɢʜᴛᴇɴᴍᴇɴᴛ
Depictions of demons from The Codex Aureus of Echternach (Codex aureus Epternacensis), an illuminated Gospel Book created in the approximate period ᴬᴰ1030–1050.
Note the negroidal features of the demons.
Note the negroidal features of the demons.
❤2