The Caucasian Genetic Relationship With Other Near Hominids.

The genetic origin of our people is remarkably similar to what we already know, but the key for Jewish misdirection is not outright lie, but taking the truth and obfuscating it.

Modern tainted anthropology will place the birth of Adam (the beginning of the human race) at the confluence of all the branches above in purple (300k years ago) to include all non-whites; when it's truly much later at the beginning of the Caucasian people (70k years ago) which only includes White people.

Understanding Caucasians are a product of evolution is also important as we today have a residual ~1% Neanderthal DNA, which would make us mixed soul-less mongrels according to the doctrine of Generationism; if not for evolution and understanding this 1% was obtained prior to the birth of Adam.

Adam is the standard for purity, so prior-mixing is a non-issue, only post-mixing between Adamites and others is an issue.

Europeans alone are absolutely pure from Adam.

Adam in the Hierarchy of Biological Classification (Taxonomy):

I have created a chart to aide visual learners on Adam's position in the hominid tree and all those who come from Adam. Only Caucasians (listed H. Sapiens) come from Adam.

I can imagine many may be upset with the different peoples of the world being divided into different species, however this occured in the very first taxonomic chart by the creator of taxonomy.

Carl Linnaeus, a Swedish scientist, created the field of taxonomy in 1735, which he divided people into 4 species (Europaeus Albus, Americanus Rubescens, Asiaticus Fuscus, Africanus Niger). All his taxonomy is still used in modern taxonomy with the exception of this category being tampered with to list everything as just H. Sapiens.

While Linnaeus divided peoples into 4 species, I have divided them into 6 species based on a maximum genetic distance of 0.1 FST for each species.

I will soon make an ethnographical world-map with updated non-geograpic names for Abos, Orientals and Malays.

Die Botschaft Gottes (The Message of God), or Volkstestament. The Reich bible.

Not canon, just an interesting find.
Link.

Die Botschaft Gottes is an eclectic edition of the New Testament (Old Testament was discarded) that was intended to replace the Luther Bible; published in 1940 by the Deutsche Christen organisation (DC) which were given authority over the newly formed (1933) Reich Church (Deutsche Evangelische Kirche) founded by Adolf Hitler.
[ German Christians (DC) were a racist, anti-Semitic and leader-oriented movement in German Protestantism that wanted to align it with the ideology of National Socialism from 1932 to 1945. ]

This is one of around 40 "ethnic translation" efforts to revise the Luther Bible in a "folkish" sense in Germany between 1901 and 1941.

Unfortunately the true meaning and narrative of scripture was not understood at the time, which meant rewriting and purging of any Judahite themes, which were mistaken for Jewish themes, occured.

Die Botschaft Gottes was no exception and corrupted the text, removing the entire Old Testament and editing the New Testament.
So while an interesting bible, it is not the true word; so don't believe "this is it".
This is not a polemic against German Christians (DC), as they worked to the best of their knowledge with the best information they had; which is difficult in a War World.
Given more time, less time and resources on immediate war; I imagine they would have formed something quite similar to Christian Aryanism. For those wondering, I am still continuing on with the Codex Amiatinus bible project!

Features of this bible include rearrangement of biblical text by subject, and the addition of "außerbiblische Jesus-Logien."

The bible is divided into 4 main parts:
1. Jesus der Heiland (Jesus the Saviour).
The amalgamation of Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) with chapters such as Sein Kampf and Sein Sieg.
2. Jesus der Gottessohn (Jesus the Son of God).
The Gospel of John.
3. Jesus der Herr (Jesus the Lord).
The Acts of the Apostles.
4. Das Werden der Christusgemeinde (The Origin of the Christian Church).
Reports and testimonies from the Early Church.

Die Botschaft Gottes (The Message of God), or Volkstestament. The Reich bible.

Not canon, just an interesting find.
More info.

Adam in the Hierarchy of Biological Classification (Taxonomy):

I have now completed the chart and ethnographical map, for visual aide on Adam's position in the hominid tree and all those who come from Adam. Only Caucasians (listed H. Sapiens) come from Adam, all others are not of Adam.

The full list of races are:
H.— Nigrus, Sapiens, Limulus,
Pilosus, Miscellus & Elazygus.

Jews & other recent mongrels are listed as crosses (×), as they aren't proper races.

This isn't the first taxonomical division of genus-homo, many other precede it such as Carl Linnaeus', a Swedish scientist, who created the field of taxonomy in 1735, which he divided people into 4 species (Europaeus Albus, Americanus Rubescens, Asiaticus Fuscus, Africanus Niger), based on skull & skin pigmentation.
All his taxonomy is still used in modern taxonomy with the exception of this category being tampered with to list everything as just H. Sapiens.
I have instead divided them based on a maximum 0.1FST genetic distance.

The Six Races of Man—The Remaining Species of Homo Genus.
Adam, the first H. Sapiens, the pinnacle of God's creation, that stands out amongst the beasts as an intelligent, dominant and peculiar being.

The Six Races of Man—The Remaining Species of Homo Genus.
Adam, the first H. Sapiens, the pinnacle of God's creation, that stands out amongst the beasts as an intelligent, dominant and peculiar being.

Christianity and Eugenics:

Eugenics (from Greek εὖ (eû, “well”) + γένος (génos, “born”)) is the improvement of the human population via artificial selective pressure; through methods such as: selective breeding, sterilisation, genetic screening and segregation. While we speak of artificial means, eugenics is a naturally occurring process (albeit significantly slower) that has refined and improved the human population since our creation.

The philosophy of artificial eugenics was first developed by Francis Galton (Charles Darwin's cousin) and inspired by his cousin's theory of evolution. Eugenics works on the basic principle of increasing reproduction of ‘desirables’ and decreasing reproduction of ‘undesirables.’

While there are moral and biblically sound methods of eugenic artificial selective pressure, such as those prior listed, there are extremely immoral methods that contradict scripture, such as murder, through euthanasia, culling and abortion.

Murder, especially that of children (abortion), is wicked, depraved and under no circumstances is a biblically acceptable method of eugenics [Genesis 9:6, Job 24:14]; however preventative methods that stop the initial creation of undesirable offspring without any harm, is acceptable.

Eugenics was widely and openly practiced in the Western World in the early 20th century with major support from Christians who biblically justified it on the following principles:
—Honouring God’s Image— (Eugenics forbidden to alter our morphology and anatomy. [Genesis 1:27])
—Prevention of Suffering— (Responsibility to prevent suffering brought on by poor genetic health and disorders, which are all the product of mutations after our creation. [Acts 10:38; Luke 9:2])
—Stewardship of Creation— (Safeguarding God’s creation [Genesis 1] includes maintaining the ecological balance of the natural world, which includes population improvement, which is already employed for flora and fauna for increased usefulness and condition hardening.)
—Healthfulness— (Responsibility to maintain the health of our bodies, including genetic health.)
—God's Laws of Nature— (In nature the fitter better perpetuate their genes among their population which makes the population fitter.)
—Be Fruitful and Multiply— (The reckless breeding of the unfit is not fruitful, God created Adam as a thoroughbred which shined over the world like a light among the darkness as the pinnacle of His creation. [Genesis 1:28; 9:1,7])

A grand example of biblical eugenics is the selective breeding (arranged marriages) of the patriarches Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; three consecutive generations of selective breeding; which produced a superior Adamic stock in the land of Canaan.

Why should eugenics be employed for mankind?
Increased intelligence, ancestral purification, improved athletic ability, removal of genetic disorders, improved natural health, increased quality of life, increased life expectancy, decreased artificial health needs, decreased dietary and water requirements, improved immune system, increased resiliency to diseases, increased resiliency to climate and extreme temperatures, as well many other benefits.

All of these factors are already attributes of the White (Adamic) race as we are a product of naturally occurring eugenics, which has placed us genetically superior to all other creatures; all according to God's plan.

1 Corinthians 15:39
³⁹ NON OMNIS CARO, EADEM CARO: SED ALIA HOMINVM, ALIA PECORVM, ALIA CARO VOLVCRVM, ALIA AVTEM PISCIVM.
³⁹ All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.

Racial Connotations Lost in Translation:
These meaning can be colloquially recovered with simple substitution of synonyms. The definitions aren't being changed, they are simply being more accurately portrayed. Feel free to check any of the definitions of the following Latin words used, as well as their Greek counterparts.

Genus (Gk: Γένος/ Genos)
- Race, lineage, origin.
Gens (Gk: Έθνος/ Ethnos)
- Folk, tribe, people, family.
Gentilis (Gk: Ελλην/ Ellen)
- Belonging to same gens, kinsman (typically foreign).
Populus
- People, population, nation, community.

-----------
1 Peter 2:9 (Genus, Gens, Populus)
⁹ But ye are a chosen RACE, a royal priesthood, an holy FOLK, a peculiar PEOPLE; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:

—Saint Peter addressing the Christians of Greece/ Anatolia.

-----------
Colossians 3:11 (Gentilis, Iudaeus[Pistonym])
¹¹ Where there is neither KINSMAN nor JUDAIC, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.

—Both the kinsman (race abroad) and the Judaic (those of the race, practicing the faith) are one in Christ.

-----------
Acts 18:6 (Gentes[Gens plural])
⁶ And when they opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the KINDRED.

—Paul stating he will venture out and spread the faith among the folks (of his race), not the races.

-----------
Christianity paints a picture, not of inter-racial universalism, but of racial universalism within one particular race, the White race.

Preterist but I think it's cyclical. Also by no means a scholar.

Now that's an interesting position. Do you mind elaborating?

Full Preterism (All biblical prophecy was fulfilled by 70ᴬᴰ)
The History of Full Preterism by Todd Dennis 2007

Partial Preterism (Most was fulfilled, but some still to pass)
Unpacking the Tribulation: An Introduction to Preterism

Well, like I said I'm not really a scholar but as long as the Jews continue to be Jews and refuse the Christ there will always be tribulations or pogroms as they call it.

Futurism (Most still to come)
A "Rationale" for Futurism: A Future Tribulation and Daniel's 70th Week

Job 12:7-10
But ask the beasts, and they will teach you; the birds of the heavens, and they will tell you; or the bushes of the earth, and they will teach you; and the fish of the sea will declare to you. Who among all these does not know that the hand of the Lord has done this? In his hand is the life of every living thing and the breath of all mankind.

Christians are to have a deep respect for nature which proclaims the glory of our Heavenly Father.

@adamicenlightenment

Nephilim? Giants, Angels or Men?

Most Christian theologians throughout all of history interpreted that the Nephilim of the bible were the mixed progeny of the sons of Seth who took wives from the daughters of Cain. Martin Luther was no exception who had the following remarks to make:

The 'daughters of men' were the 'daughters of Cain'¹⁰¹ and the 'sons of God' were the 'sons of Adam'³². Named 'of God' for their lineage as the pure pious blessed seed³², and the other named 'of men' for being outside this lineage, known for their impious, ungodly ways¹¹¹ and their bestial²⁷ lust and desires. Luther rejected what he called Jewish fables³³ which claimed sons of God signified something celestial. The claimed large stature of Nephilim is a misinterpretation¹²¹; in Numbers 13:33 they are called giants not due to the bulk of their body¹²³, but due to their nature as brute violent oppressors¹²⁴ (tyrants) without law nor honour¹²³, only indulging their pleasure and desire¹²³, who prey upon those beneath them¹²³. The patriarchs had strictly forbidden to contract alliances with the offspring of Cain³⁰, as not to taint the nature of the sons of God via their mingling with the accursed generation of Cain³¹.

Ref: Correspond to indexes in Luther's Works Vol. 2, Commentary On Genesis 1-6.

"In prohibiting marriage with the Cainites it was the chief purpose of the pious fathers to maintain their generation pure." ~ Martin Luther ¹⁰³.

-
Often claimed Ge 6:2,4 "sons of God" is Angels by claiming Jb 1:6.2:1 matches. However doesn't match DSS LXX LV, only corrupted MT. However does match DSS-4Q37 LXX LV De 32:8 in reference to Israelites.
-

What is the underlying reason for the Cainites savage behavour? Is it merely their improper ways or is there a fundamental reason behind it?
Previously I have spoken on this, which I stated, the descendants of Cain were largely racially mixed with humanoid fauna (Preadamites), thus are more predisposed to act in animalistic ways than their Adamic counterparts; and this is the underlying reason their mingling would corrupt. If both were wholly of the same stock, would they just not merely raise their crossed offspring together to be pious? Would this justify God to flood the Adamic world and genocide them all? If it was simply their character which was unholy, it would only make sense for God to set out the pious to evangelise the impious, not eradicate them.

It is clear they were of tainted biological stock, which we can see in scripture. Cain, a pure descendant of Adam, in exile took a wife [Gen. 4:17], however no other humans except Adam, Eve and Cain existed at this time (Abel was already murdered [Gen. 4:8]). Seth would not be born until [Gen. 4:25] and Adam's other numerous progeny not until [Gen. 5:4]. The only conclusion is Cain's wife was completely outside their lineage, his wife was humanoid fauna (nonwhite).

We see the descendants of Cain took pure Adamic spouses later on in history [Gen. 6], which likely aided in the bleaching of many Cainites and the expression of recessive genes such as pale complexion and their increased beauty; which unfortunately made them more acceptable to Adamites [Gen. 6:2].

"The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose." Gen. 6:2

(H2896→טבת→tbth→lit. good; fig. pleasant to sight, fair. G2570→καλαί→kalai→lit. good; fig. beautiful, fair. L×→pvlchrae→lit. beautiful, fair; fig. noble. E×→fair→light complexion)

It is interesting the English translators chose the word fair (lit. light complexion), and it may seem like conjecture to claim they were literally seen as pale skinned to the Sethites, however it definitely says they appeared physically attractive enough (which is often synonymous with light complexion) to take as wives; which would be a product of higher Adamic admixture.

While they appeared Adamic (White) enough to Sethites to wed; did God think so as well?
No, God flooded the entire Adamic world to eradicate them. You can never bleach nonwhites enough to be acceptable in the eyes of God.

Phenotype of King David:
King David, direct ancestor of Jesus, is described biblically as "ʼadmônîy" in Hebrew and "RVFVS" in Latin; both of which mean fair-skinned (showing blood through skin) and red-haired.

1 Samuel 16:12
¹² And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he.

1 Samuel 17:42
⁴² And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance.

H132: ʼadmônîy; L×: Rufus.

Strongs Concordance:
¹³² #H0132 : אַדְמֹנִי : ʼadmônîy : {ad-mo-nee’} : or (fully) אַדְמוֹנִי ʼadmôwnîy ; from H119; reddish (of the hair or the complexion):—red, ruddy.

Latin:
rūfus (f rūfa, n rūfum); first/second-declension adjective. ¹ red, reddish, ruddy. ² redheaded, red-haired


Image: Statue of King David (ᴬᴰ1609–1612) by Nicolas Cordier in the Borghese Chapel of the Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, Italy

The Beit Alfa Synagogue was constructed in the sixth-centuryᴬᴰ, in a small village situated in the northern foothills of Mt. Giboa.

The community that built it were most likely Israelites (≠🇮🇱) that either escaped Jerusalem's destruction or were already isolated there... which would explain why they're depicted fair-skinned with blond hair, alongside Hebraic inscriptions, in many of the interior mosaics.

Any Israelite remnant in the area has since been wiped out by Muslim expansion in the following centuries.

@adamicenlightenment