Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
No Miscegnation — A Commandment of God.
The 6th Commandment:
(7th in some numbering systems)
Little is known about the meaning and etymology of this word in all 3 languages, and it's definition is assumed by interpreting it's context; which is extremely subjective due to it's very rare use.
What we do know is the word moechaveris is directly transliterated from the Greek μοιχεύσεις, indicating Latin did not have a word that accurately depicted it's meaning and had to loan the word; which is interesting considering Latin has many words to refer to extramarital affairs; the definition most modern scholars ascribe to the word.
On the other hand, the word μοιχεύσεις is a translation of the Hebrew תִּֿנְאָֽ֑ף, indicating what μοιχεύσεις meant is what Greek speaking Hebrews around 300ᴮᶜ understood תִּֿנְאָֽ֑ף to mean.
Is there any surviving texts around this time period which use any of these words, which we can determine the true definition from?
In fact there is: History of Animals by Aristotle, written 350ᴮᶜ.
Aristotle is a very well renowned and respectable historian, philosopher and polymath; who is known not to be sloppy in his work, and given his usage of the word is at approximately the same time (this also being the earliest usage and prior to the Septuagint) we can trust his usage would be accurate to it's definition.
History of Animals:
Greek: "Ἔτι δ' ἄλλο γένος ἐστὶν ἀετῶν οἱ καλούμενοι γνήσιοι. Φασὶ δὲ τούτους μόνους καὶ τῶν ἄλλων ὀρνίθων γνησίους εἶναι· τὰ γὰρ ἄλλα γένη μέμικται καὶ μεμοίχευται ὑπ' ἀλλήλων, καὶ τῶν ἀετῶν καὶ τῶν ἱεράκων καὶ τῶν ἐλαχίστων."
English: "There is another species called the 'true-bred'; people say that these are the only true-bred birds to be found, that all other birds-eagles, hawks, and the smallest birds-are all spoilt by the interbreeding of different species."
The word here με(μοίχευ)ται, is a conjugated form of the word (μοιχεύ)σεις; which Aristotle literally uses it to refer to interbreeding, mongrelisation or miscegnation between different bird species.
Given this information, it is beyond a shadow of a doubt that the sixth (or seventh) commandment of God reads:
"THOU SHALT NOT MISCEGENATE"
The 6th Commandment:
(7th in some numbering systems)
600ᴮᶜ Hebrew: לֹ֣֖א (lo) תִּֿנְאָֽ֑ף (naaph)300ᴮᶜ Greek: ου (ou) μοιχεύσεις (moicheuseis)ᴬᴰ400 Latin: non moechaveris English: no (something?)Little is known about the meaning and etymology of this word in all 3 languages, and it's definition is assumed by interpreting it's context; which is extremely subjective due to it's very rare use.
What we do know is the word moechaveris is directly transliterated from the Greek μοιχεύσεις, indicating Latin did not have a word that accurately depicted it's meaning and had to loan the word; which is interesting considering Latin has many words to refer to extramarital affairs; the definition most modern scholars ascribe to the word.
On the other hand, the word μοιχεύσεις is a translation of the Hebrew תִּֿנְאָֽ֑ף, indicating what μοιχεύσεις meant is what Greek speaking Hebrews around 300ᴮᶜ understood תִּֿנְאָֽ֑ף to mean.
Is there any surviving texts around this time period which use any of these words, which we can determine the true definition from?
In fact there is: History of Animals by Aristotle, written 350ᴮᶜ.
Aristotle is a very well renowned and respectable historian, philosopher and polymath; who is known not to be sloppy in his work, and given his usage of the word is at approximately the same time (this also being the earliest usage and prior to the Septuagint) we can trust his usage would be accurate to it's definition.
History of Animals:
Greek: "Ἔτι δ' ἄλλο γένος ἐστὶν ἀετῶν οἱ καλούμενοι γνήσιοι. Φασὶ δὲ τούτους μόνους καὶ τῶν ἄλλων ὀρνίθων γνησίους εἶναι· τὰ γὰρ ἄλλα γένη μέμικται καὶ μεμοίχευται ὑπ' ἀλλήλων, καὶ τῶν ἀετῶν καὶ τῶν ἱεράκων καὶ τῶν ἐλαχίστων."
English: "There is another species called the 'true-bred'; people say that these are the only true-bred birds to be found, that all other birds-eagles, hawks, and the smallest birds-are all spoilt by the interbreeding of different species."
The word here με(μοίχευ)ται, is a conjugated form of the word (μοιχεύ)σεις; which Aristotle literally uses it to refer to interbreeding, mongrelisation or miscegnation between different bird species.
Given this information, it is beyond a shadow of a doubt that the sixth (or seventh) commandment of God reads:
"THOU SHALT NOT MISCEGENATE"
⚡3🙏3
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Who are the Adamic people?
We have extensively spoken about how the Covenants and promises of the bible are only addressed to Adam and his unadulterated progeny, who alone have souls.
- Adamic one-drop purity [Romans 11].
- Generationism, Soul Origin/ Propagation.
- Noah's flood to purge mixed mongrels.
But who are these people today?
Adam was a White man and his progeny, the Adamic people are the White race.
This is shown by:
- the etymology of Adam's name which describes him as hyperdepigmentised [Strongs Concordance H119-121] ❝to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:—be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).❞ This would mean Adam, had a ❝red❞ colour to his complexion that is associated with the ability to blush (only Whites can universally blush).
- the consumption of cow dairy by Adamic people [Genesis 18:8; Song of Solomom 5:1; Isaiah 7:22], showing lactose tolerance, a trait very rare among nonwhite populations but universal among Northern Europeans.
- the phenotypical traits of Adamic people are unique to modern Europeans [Genesis 25:25; 1 Samuel 16:12. 17:42; Psalm 51:7; Song of Solomon 5:10. 5:12. 7:4; Isaiah 29:22. Jeremiah 30:6. Lamentations 4:7] Spurious[Genesis Apocryphon (1Q20) col 20; 1 Enoch 106.2]
- the fair phenotype (blonde/ blue eyed) of Jesus Christ Himself, who had a pure lineage directly to Adam. [Revelation 1:14-16; Qu'ran (Sahih al-Bukhari 7128); Emerald of Tiberius Caesar; Paintings by John Sartain, based on the Emerald] Spurious[Description of Publius Lentullus; Archko Volume; Letter from Pontius Pilate to Tiberius Caesar]
- the fair phenotype (blonde/ blue eyed) of Jesus' mother Mary, His only material parent. As blonde/ blue eyed is recessive, Jesus couldn't have any other appearance [Patrologiæ Græca 120:191-194 Epiphanii Monachi - De Vita B. Virginis: 6].
- the etymology and origin of the word Arab (e'rab) meaning two things: the mixed mongrels, and to darken; showing that for an Adamite to mix, would mean to darken his complexion [Strongs Concordance H6148-6155].
- Jesus' disciples, the Apostles, only spread to and evangelized White nations and regions inhabited by Whites. They spread to the furthest White inhabited regions, but neglected non-white inhabited regions that were local.
- the sixth commandment of God that forbids race-mixing.
We have extensively spoken about how the Covenants and promises of the bible are only addressed to Adam and his unadulterated progeny, who alone have souls.
- Adamic one-drop purity [Romans 11].
- Generationism, Soul Origin/ Propagation.
- Noah's flood to purge mixed mongrels.
But who are these people today?
Adam was a White man and his progeny, the Adamic people are the White race.
This is shown by:
- the etymology of Adam's name which describes him as hyperdepigmentised [Strongs Concordance H119-121] ❝to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:—be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).❞ This would mean Adam, had a ❝red❞ colour to his complexion that is associated with the ability to blush (only Whites can universally blush).
- the consumption of cow dairy by Adamic people [Genesis 18:8; Song of Solomom 5:1; Isaiah 7:22], showing lactose tolerance, a trait very rare among nonwhite populations but universal among Northern Europeans.
- the phenotypical traits of Adamic people are unique to modern Europeans [Genesis 25:25; 1 Samuel 16:12. 17:42; Psalm 51:7; Song of Solomon 5:10. 5:12. 7:4; Isaiah 29:22. Jeremiah 30:6. Lamentations 4:7] Spurious[Genesis Apocryphon (1Q20) col 20; 1 Enoch 106.2]
- the fair phenotype (blonde/ blue eyed) of Jesus Christ Himself, who had a pure lineage directly to Adam. [Revelation 1:14-16; Qu'ran (Sahih al-Bukhari 7128); Emerald of Tiberius Caesar; Paintings by John Sartain, based on the Emerald] Spurious[Description of Publius Lentullus; Archko Volume; Letter from Pontius Pilate to Tiberius Caesar]
- the fair phenotype (blonde/ blue eyed) of Jesus' mother Mary, His only material parent. As blonde/ blue eyed is recessive, Jesus couldn't have any other appearance [Patrologiæ Græca 120:191-194 Epiphanii Monachi - De Vita B. Virginis: 6].
- the etymology and origin of the word Arab (e'rab) meaning two things: the mixed mongrels, and to darken; showing that for an Adamite to mix, would mean to darken his complexion [Strongs Concordance H6148-6155].
- Jesus' disciples, the Apostles, only spread to and evangelized White nations and regions inhabited by Whites. They spread to the furthest White inhabited regions, but neglected non-white inhabited regions that were local.
- the sixth commandment of God that forbids race-mixing.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
What is the Bible? And it's purpose and standing with science?
The Bible is the Genesis (origin) of Adamkind and the history of God's action in the world among the faithful line of Adamkind; accounting two main portions of our history: our fall and our redemption.
Understanding what the Bible actually is and what knowledge you are suppose to receive from it, is important. It's not a Mathematics, Physics or Chemistry textbook; so you shouldn't expect to find all the answers to those fields of science within, and you shouldn't expect to find confirmations for certain scientific concepts such as if the Earth is flat or round, or if biological adaption truly occurs (evolution); this we can scientifically observe.
It is also not an exhaustive history textbook on the complete history of the universe nor the complete history of all of Adamkind; only the concise history of our origin, and the concise history of God's interaction with the faithful line of Adamkind.
Science and exhaustive history are things we can discover and study outside of scripture.
We understand that scripture is infallible (absolute truth), so there can be no contradictions nor paradoxes within scripture and between scripture and observable truth (science).
Should a contradiction arise between scripture and observable truth (science) or within themselves; either man's interpretation of scripture is false, or man's understanding of science is false. Only man is fallible.
This isn't against the concept of Sola Scriptura; for Sola Scriptura is merely that scripture alone is sufficient to delineate how Man can be saved and that scripture alone has insight into the Praeternatural.
For knowledge outside this scope of Soteriology and Praeternaturalogy; we must observe, study and test with scientific methods; whilst being vigilant that no contradiction to scripture can truthfully occur.
A Christian has nothing to fear from the study of science; as Christians stand behind truth, we have no need to live in lies as others depend on. The delineation of science will always vindicate God and our faith, as it was built upon truth alone.
Every major discovery or advancement in the fields of science for the past two thousand years, whether in health, physics, chemistry or archeology, was the work of White Christian men.
Christians advanced this world to the technological levels we see today, and it only decays now that White Christian men are becoming scarce.
Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post
The Bible is the Genesis (origin) of Adamkind and the history of God's action in the world among the faithful line of Adamkind; accounting two main portions of our history: our fall and our redemption.
Understanding what the Bible actually is and what knowledge you are suppose to receive from it, is important. It's not a Mathematics, Physics or Chemistry textbook; so you shouldn't expect to find all the answers to those fields of science within, and you shouldn't expect to find confirmations for certain scientific concepts such as if the Earth is flat or round, or if biological adaption truly occurs (evolution); this we can scientifically observe.
It is also not an exhaustive history textbook on the complete history of the universe nor the complete history of all of Adamkind; only the concise history of our origin, and the concise history of God's interaction with the faithful line of Adamkind.
Science and exhaustive history are things we can discover and study outside of scripture.
We understand that scripture is infallible (absolute truth), so there can be no contradictions nor paradoxes within scripture and between scripture and observable truth (science).
Should a contradiction arise between scripture and observable truth (science) or within themselves; either man's interpretation of scripture is false, or man's understanding of science is false. Only man is fallible.
This isn't against the concept of Sola Scriptura; for Sola Scriptura is merely that scripture alone is sufficient to delineate how Man can be saved and that scripture alone has insight into the Praeternatural.
For knowledge outside this scope of Soteriology and Praeternaturalogy; we must observe, study and test with scientific methods; whilst being vigilant that no contradiction to scripture can truthfully occur.
A Christian has nothing to fear from the study of science; as Christians stand behind truth, we have no need to live in lies as others depend on. The delineation of science will always vindicate God and our faith, as it was built upon truth alone.
Every major discovery or advancement in the fields of science for the past two thousand years, whether in health, physics, chemistry or archeology, was the work of White Christian men.
Christians advanced this world to the technological levels we see today, and it only decays now that White Christian men are becoming scarce.
------------------Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Sectarianism, another Brother War.
In this day and age, the children of God divide themselves amongst their Churches, personal interpretations, practices and culturally fabricated White ethnic boundaries; going as far to say only one set of these have any relationship with God.
It is time we stop dividing the congregation of God and stop dividing our race. There is only one congregation of God and that is the entire White race; His children.
It is unreasonable to believe we can all be one culturally homogeneous group of people and we should not expect it; differences will occur naturally, such as language, customs and beliefs. But gone should be the days that we look upon another White Christian and see them as anything other than our brother.
We all come from various Christian denominational and White ethnic backgrounds; but this is nothing new. During the Apostolic Age, there were many independent Churches from various White ethnic backgrounds; such as Jerusalem, Corinth, Philippi, Ephesus, Antioch, Constantinople, Alexandria, Carthage and Rome; gathering Greeks, Romans, Gauls, Germans, and many other White tribes. They weren't all culturally, religiously and ethnically identical but they recognised the one thing that mattered, that they were one in Christ.
While we understand many Churches and even our own brothers believe or teach falsehoods, we don't tear our brothers down and divide Christ among different groups of beliefs, but show our brothers the errors of their ways; learning and moving past it, together. Despite believing and teaching in error, this will not effect whether or not they go to heaven; for Jesus did not command us all to be learnt scholars without error, as all men are fallible.
Jesus only asked that we have faith in Him, that we believe He died and rose for us.
No matter the falsehoods you may unknowingly believe, none of that matters and none of that will bar you from Heaven, as long as you have faith in Him. Every single White Christian who believes in Christ, regardless of their denomination or beliefs, will meet each other in Heaven.
They say the gates of hell will not prevail against the Church [Matthew 16:18] (The word "Church" in Greek "ἐκκλησία" means congregation and referred to the entire Christian population of a given region.) which is correct but they were never talking about a building or religious political body; they were talking about faithful (Christian) White men, women and children.
They were saying the gates of hell will not prevail against our race.
Every White person who believes in the death and resurrection of Christ is a Christian; and we should be known as nothing but that, lest we put our differences before Christ.
I will not call you Catholic,
I will not call you Protestant,
I will not call you Orthodox,
because I know all you are is a Christian;
I will call you brother.
[Galatians 3:26-28; Colossians 3:11]
Fides et Gens; Faith and Race.
In this day and age, the children of God divide themselves amongst their Churches, personal interpretations, practices and culturally fabricated White ethnic boundaries; going as far to say only one set of these have any relationship with God.
It is time we stop dividing the congregation of God and stop dividing our race. There is only one congregation of God and that is the entire White race; His children.
It is unreasonable to believe we can all be one culturally homogeneous group of people and we should not expect it; differences will occur naturally, such as language, customs and beliefs. But gone should be the days that we look upon another White Christian and see them as anything other than our brother.
We all come from various Christian denominational and White ethnic backgrounds; but this is nothing new. During the Apostolic Age, there were many independent Churches from various White ethnic backgrounds; such as Jerusalem, Corinth, Philippi, Ephesus, Antioch, Constantinople, Alexandria, Carthage and Rome; gathering Greeks, Romans, Gauls, Germans, and many other White tribes. They weren't all culturally, religiously and ethnically identical but they recognised the one thing that mattered, that they were one in Christ.
While we understand many Churches and even our own brothers believe or teach falsehoods, we don't tear our brothers down and divide Christ among different groups of beliefs, but show our brothers the errors of their ways; learning and moving past it, together. Despite believing and teaching in error, this will not effect whether or not they go to heaven; for Jesus did not command us all to be learnt scholars without error, as all men are fallible.
Jesus only asked that we have faith in Him, that we believe He died and rose for us.
No matter the falsehoods you may unknowingly believe, none of that matters and none of that will bar you from Heaven, as long as you have faith in Him. Every single White Christian who believes in Christ, regardless of their denomination or beliefs, will meet each other in Heaven.
They say the gates of hell will not prevail against the Church [Matthew 16:18] (The word "Church" in Greek "ἐκκλησία" means congregation and referred to the entire Christian population of a given region.) which is correct but they were never talking about a building or religious political body; they were talking about faithful (Christian) White men, women and children.
They were saying the gates of hell will not prevail against our race.
Every White person who believes in the death and resurrection of Christ is a Christian; and we should be known as nothing but that, lest we put our differences before Christ.
I will not call you Catholic,
I will not call you Protestant,
I will not call you Orthodox,
because I know all you are is a Christian;
I will call you brother.
You are all sons of God.
For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
There is neither Pole nor Swede,
there is neither Protestant nor Catholic,
there is no male and female,
for you are all one in Jesus Christ.[Galatians 3:26-28; Colossians 3:11]
Fides et Gens; Faith and Race.
❤2
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Origin of the word Simian:
The word used in reference to non-human primates (apes).
From the Latin: Simia
Infections: simiae, simiam, simiarum, simias, simiis, simiae
Alternative: sīmius
From: sīmus (“snub-nosed”)
Etymology: Ancient Greek σῑμός (sīmós, “snub-nosed” or “flat-nosed”)
Definition: pejorative (slur)- monkey; ape; (derogatory term applied to men)
Appearing twice in scripture: 1 Kings 10:22; 2 Chronicles 9:21
[Same verse]: For the king had at sea a navy of Tharshish with the navy of Hiram: once in three years came the navy of Tharshish, bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes (simias), and peacocks.
Solomon likely had "Simia" slaves delivered.
Hebrew of word: [קוֺף]
Transliteration: qoph
Phonetic: kofe
Etymology: Combination of Sanskrit [कपि][kapi] and Egyptian loan-word [gôfë], [gi'f]; meaning "ape" or "foreigner".
Looking at usage of Simia in antiquity, it's mostly used for apes who can speak and perform tasks, but used interchangeably with monkeys, showing they didn't see a difference.
The word used in reference to non-human primates (apes).
From the Latin: Simia
Infections: simiae, simiam, simiarum, simias, simiis, simiae
Alternative: sīmius
From: sīmus (“snub-nosed”)
Etymology: Ancient Greek σῑμός (sīmós, “snub-nosed” or “flat-nosed”)
Definition: pejorative (slur)- monkey; ape; (derogatory term applied to men)
Appearing twice in scripture: 1 Kings 10:22; 2 Chronicles 9:21
[Same verse]: For the king had at sea a navy of Tharshish with the navy of Hiram: once in three years came the navy of Tharshish, bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes (simias), and peacocks.
Solomon likely had "Simia" slaves delivered.
Hebrew of word: [קוֺף]
Transliteration: qoph
Phonetic: kofe
Etymology: Combination of Sanskrit [कपि][kapi] and Egyptian loan-word [gôfë], [gi'f]; meaning "ape" or "foreigner".
Looking at usage of Simia in antiquity, it's mostly used for apes who can speak and perform tasks, but used interchangeably with monkeys, showing they didn't see a difference.
🔥1
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Titus 1:10-16
¹⁰ For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: ¹¹ Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. ¹²... ¹³... ¹⁴ Don't give heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. ¹⁵ Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. ¹⁶ They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
Blood Libel
or ritual murder libel, are accounts, numbering in the thousands, of Jews murdering European Christian children in order to use their blood in the performance of religious rituals, including the consumption of their blood. It also includes accounts of Jews poisoning wells, killing entire towns and grave robbing.
Jews still poison our water and murder our children.
The bible warned us.
¹⁰ For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: ¹¹ Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. ¹²... ¹³... ¹⁴ Don't give heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. ¹⁵ Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. ¹⁶ They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
Blood Libel
or ritual murder libel, are accounts, numbering in the thousands, of Jews murdering European Christian children in order to use their blood in the performance of religious rituals, including the consumption of their blood. It also includes accounts of Jews poisoning wells, killing entire towns and grave robbing.
Jews still poison our water and murder our children.
The bible warned us.
👍3
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Adamites_and_Preadamites.pdf
1.6 MB
Adamites and Preadamites (1878)
by Alexander Winchell
A demonstration on the existence of men before Adam.
- a United States geologist who contributed to this field mainly as an educator and a popular lecturer and author. His views on evolution aroused controversy among his contemporaries; today the racism of these views is more cause for comment.
by Alexander Winchell
A demonstration on the existence of men before Adam.
- a United States geologist who contributed to this field mainly as an educator and a popular lecturer and author. His views on evolution aroused controversy among his contemporaries; today the racism of these views is more cause for comment.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 2453: Ἰουδαῖος (Judæan)
…The apostle John, inasmuch as agreeably to the state of things in his day he looked upon the Jews as a body of men hostile to Christianity, with whom he had come to see that both he and all true Christians had nothing in common… even in his record of the life of Jesus not only himself makes a distinction between the Jews and Jesus, but ascribes to Jesus and his apostles language in which they distinguish themselves from the Jews, as though the latter sprang from an alien race… especially the rulers, priests, members of the Sanhedrin, Pharisees — he does not hesitate to style οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι…
Strange, that's an oddly specific thing for Saint John to do. It's as if the Jews were recognised as an entirely different race of people from Judahites, both who inhabited Judæa as citizens.
Such as the Idumæans who were known to have been conquered and joined the country as citizens [Josephus Antiquities 13:9.1; Strabo Geography 16:2.34] who instilled their own Idumæan king (Herod) [Josephus Antiquities 14:15.2] who used his position to fill the priest classes with fellow Idumæans, such as the Pharisees [Josephus Wars 2:8.2] who murdered Jesus. The same Idumæans who would start several wars with Rome [Josephus Wars 4:3.1-2] and be expelled to North Africa (Sephardic) and Khazaria (Ashkenazi).
It's almost like it's been right in front of our noses the entire time.
STRONGS NT 2453: Ἰουδαῖος (Judæan)
…The apostle John, inasmuch as agreeably to the state of things in his day he looked upon the Jews as a body of men hostile to Christianity, with whom he had come to see that both he and all true Christians had nothing in common… even in his record of the life of Jesus not only himself makes a distinction between the Jews and Jesus, but ascribes to Jesus and his apostles language in which they distinguish themselves from the Jews, as though the latter sprang from an alien race… especially the rulers, priests, members of the Sanhedrin, Pharisees — he does not hesitate to style οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι…
Strange, that's an oddly specific thing for Saint John to do. It's as if the Jews were recognised as an entirely different race of people from Judahites, both who inhabited Judæa as citizens.
Such as the Idumæans who were known to have been conquered and joined the country as citizens [Josephus Antiquities 13:9.1; Strabo Geography 16:2.34] who instilled their own Idumæan king (Herod) [Josephus Antiquities 14:15.2] who used his position to fill the priest classes with fellow Idumæans, such as the Pharisees [Josephus Wars 2:8.2] who murdered Jesus. The same Idumæans who would start several wars with Rome [Josephus Wars 4:3.1-2] and be expelled to North Africa (Sephardic) and Khazaria (Ashkenazi).
It's almost like it's been right in front of our noses the entire time.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Reconciliation_of_Science_and_Religion.pdf
9.7 MB
Reconciliation of Science and Religion (1877)
by Alexander Winchell
Scripture is absolute truth, and with science with can observe truth. So no contradiction can truthfully occur between scripture and science; if any contradiction did arise, either man's interpretation of scripture is false, or man's observation of science is false.
For this reason we should never fear the expansion and study of science, as it ultimately in the end only proves Christianity completely correct.
by Alexander Winchell
Scripture is absolute truth, and with science with can observe truth. So no contradiction can truthfully occur between scripture and science; if any contradiction did arise, either man's interpretation of scripture is false, or man's observation of science is false.
For this reason we should never fear the expansion and study of science, as it ultimately in the end only proves Christianity completely correct.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
thenegrobeastori00carrrich.pdf
23.3 MB
The Negro a Beast, or, In the Image of God? (1900)
by Charles Caroll
by Charles Caroll
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Reconciliation_of_Science_and_Religion.pdf
9.7 MB
Reconciliation of Science and Religion (1877)
by Alexander Winchell
Scripture is absolute truth, and with science with can observe truth. So no contradiction can truthfully occur between scripture and science; if any contradiction did arise, either man's interpretation of scripture is false, or man's observation of science is false.
For this reason we should never fear the expansion and study of science, as it ultimately in the end only proves Christianity completely correct.
by Alexander Winchell
Scripture is absolute truth, and with science with can observe truth. So no contradiction can truthfully occur between scripture and science; if any contradiction did arise, either man's interpretation of scripture is false, or man's observation of science is false.
For this reason we should never fear the expansion and study of science, as it ultimately in the end only proves Christianity completely correct.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
The Caucasian Genetic Relationship With Other Near Hominids.
The genetic origin of our people is remarkably similar to what we already know, but the key for Jewish misdirection is not outright lie, but taking the truth and obfuscating it.
Modern tainted anthropology will place the birth of Adam (the beginning of the human race) at the confluence of all the branches above in purple (300k years ago) to include all non-whites; when it's truly much later at the beginning of the Caucasian people (70k years ago) which only includes White people.
Understanding Caucasians are a product of evolution is also important as we today have a residual ~1% Neanderthal DNA, which would make us mixed soul-less mongrels according to the doctrine of Generationism; if not for evolution and understanding this 1% was obtained prior to the birth of Adam.
Adam is the standard for purity, so prior-mixing is a non-issue, only post-mixing between Adamites and others is an issue.
Europeans alone are absolutely pure from Adam.
The genetic origin of our people is remarkably similar to what we already know, but the key for Jewish misdirection is not outright lie, but taking the truth and obfuscating it.
Modern tainted anthropology will place the birth of Adam (the beginning of the human race) at the confluence of all the branches above in purple (300k years ago) to include all non-whites; when it's truly much later at the beginning of the Caucasian people (70k years ago) which only includes White people.
Understanding Caucasians are a product of evolution is also important as we today have a residual ~1% Neanderthal DNA, which would make us mixed soul-less mongrels according to the doctrine of Generationism; if not for evolution and understanding this 1% was obtained prior to the birth of Adam.
Adam is the standard for purity, so prior-mixing is a non-issue, only post-mixing between Adamites and others is an issue.
Europeans alone are absolutely pure from Adam.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Adam in the Hierarchy of Biological Classification (Taxonomy):
I have created a chart to aide visual learners on Adam's position in the hominid tree and all those who come from Adam. Only Caucasians (listed H. Sapiens) come from Adam.
I can imagine many may be upset with the different peoples of the world being divided into different species, however this occured in the very first taxonomic chart by the creator of taxonomy.
Carl Linnaeus, a Swedish scientist, created the field of taxonomy in 1735, which he divided people into 4 species (Europaeus Albus, Americanus Rubescens, Asiaticus Fuscus, Africanus Niger). All his taxonomy is still used in modern taxonomy with the exception of this category being tampered with to list everything as just H. Sapiens.
While Linnaeus divided peoples into 4 species, I have divided them into 6 species based on a maximum genetic distance of 0.1 FST for each species.
I will soon make an ethnographical world-map with updated non-geograpic names for Abos, Orientals and Malays.
I have created a chart to aide visual learners on Adam's position in the hominid tree and all those who come from Adam. Only Caucasians (listed H. Sapiens) come from Adam.
I can imagine many may be upset with the different peoples of the world being divided into different species, however this occured in the very first taxonomic chart by the creator of taxonomy.
Carl Linnaeus, a Swedish scientist, created the field of taxonomy in 1735, which he divided people into 4 species (Europaeus Albus, Americanus Rubescens, Asiaticus Fuscus, Africanus Niger). All his taxonomy is still used in modern taxonomy with the exception of this category being tampered with to list everything as just H. Sapiens.
While Linnaeus divided peoples into 4 species, I have divided them into 6 species based on a maximum genetic distance of 0.1 FST for each species.
I will soon make an ethnographical world-map with updated non-geograpic names for Abos, Orientals and Malays.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Die Botschaft Gottes (The Message of God), or Volkstestament. The Reich bible.
Not canon, just an interesting find.
Link.
Die Botschaft Gottes is an eclectic edition of the New Testament (Old Testament was discarded) that was intended to replace the Luther Bible; published in 1940 by the Deutsche Christen organisation (DC) which were given authority over the newly formed (1933) Reich Church (Deutsche Evangelische Kirche) founded by Adolf Hitler.
[ German Christians (DC) were a racist, anti-Semitic and leader-oriented movement in German Protestantism that wanted to align it with the ideology of National Socialism from 1932 to 1945. ]
This is one of around 40 "ethnic translation" efforts to revise the Luther Bible in a "folkish" sense in Germany between 1901 and 1941.
Unfortunately the true meaning and narrative of scripture was not understood at the time, which meant rewriting and purging of any Judahite themes, which were mistaken for Jewish themes, occured.
Die Botschaft Gottes was no exception and corrupted the text, removing the entire Old Testament and editing the New Testament.
So while an interesting bible, it is not the true word; so don't believe "this is it".
This is not a polemic against German Christians (DC), as they worked to the best of their knowledge with the best information they had; which is difficult in a War World.
Given more time, less time and resources on immediate war; I imagine they would have formed something quite similar to Christian Aryanism. For those wondering, I am still continuing on with the Codex Amiatinus bible project!
Features of this bible include rearrangement of biblical text by subject, and the addition of "außerbiblische Jesus-Logien."
The bible is divided into 4 main parts:
1. Jesus der Heiland (Jesus the Saviour).
The amalgamation of Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) with chapters such as Sein Kampf and Sein Sieg.
2. Jesus der Gottessohn (Jesus the Son of God).
The Gospel of John.
3. Jesus der Herr (Jesus the Lord).
The Acts of the Apostles.
4. Das Werden der Christusgemeinde (The Origin of the Christian Church).
Reports and testimonies from the Early Church.
Not canon, just an interesting find.
Link.
Die Botschaft Gottes is an eclectic edition of the New Testament (Old Testament was discarded) that was intended to replace the Luther Bible; published in 1940 by the Deutsche Christen organisation (DC) which were given authority over the newly formed (1933) Reich Church (Deutsche Evangelische Kirche) founded by Adolf Hitler.
[ German Christians (DC) were a racist, anti-Semitic and leader-oriented movement in German Protestantism that wanted to align it with the ideology of National Socialism from 1932 to 1945. ]
This is one of around 40 "ethnic translation" efforts to revise the Luther Bible in a "folkish" sense in Germany between 1901 and 1941.
Unfortunately the true meaning and narrative of scripture was not understood at the time, which meant rewriting and purging of any Judahite themes, which were mistaken for Jewish themes, occured.
Die Botschaft Gottes was no exception and corrupted the text, removing the entire Old Testament and editing the New Testament.
So while an interesting bible, it is not the true word; so don't believe "this is it".
This is not a polemic against German Christians (DC), as they worked to the best of their knowledge with the best information they had; which is difficult in a War World.
Given more time, less time and resources on immediate war; I imagine they would have formed something quite similar to Christian Aryanism. For those wondering, I am still continuing on with the Codex Amiatinus bible project!
Features of this bible include rearrangement of biblical text by subject, and the addition of "außerbiblische Jesus-Logien."
The bible is divided into 4 main parts:
1. Jesus der Heiland (Jesus the Saviour).
The amalgamation of Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) with chapters such as Sein Kampf and Sein Sieg.
2. Jesus der Gottessohn (Jesus the Son of God).
The Gospel of John.
3. Jesus der Herr (Jesus the Lord).
The Acts of the Apostles.
4. Das Werden der Christusgemeinde (The Origin of the Christian Church).
Reports and testimonies from the Early Church.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Die Botschaft Gottes 1940.pdf
70.9 MB
Die Botschaft Gottes (The Message of God), or Volkstestament. The Reich bible.
Not canon, just an interesting find.
More info.
Not canon, just an interesting find.
More info.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
20210807 ethnograph_full.png
5.1 MB
Adam in the Hierarchy of Biological Classification (Taxonomy):
I have now completed the chart and ethnographical map, for visual aide on Adam's position in the hominid tree and all those who come from Adam. Only Caucasians (listed H. Sapiens) come from Adam, all others are not of Adam.
The full list of races are:
H.— Nigrus, Sapiens, Limulus,
Pilosus, Miscellus & Elazygus.
Jews & other recent mongrels are listed as crosses (×), as they aren't proper races.
This isn't the first taxonomical division of genus-homo, many other precede it such as Carl Linnaeus', a Swedish scientist, who created the field of taxonomy in 1735, which he divided people into 4 species (Europaeus Albus, Americanus Rubescens, Asiaticus Fuscus, Africanus Niger), based on skull & skin pigmentation.
All his taxonomy is still used in modern taxonomy with the exception of this category being tampered with to list everything as just H. Sapiens.
I have instead divided them based on a maximum 0.1FST genetic distance.
I have now completed the chart and ethnographical map, for visual aide on Adam's position in the hominid tree and all those who come from Adam. Only Caucasians (listed H. Sapiens) come from Adam, all others are not of Adam.
The full list of races are:
H.— Nigrus, Sapiens, Limulus,
Pilosus, Miscellus & Elazygus.
Jews & other recent mongrels are listed as crosses (×), as they aren't proper races.
This isn't the first taxonomical division of genus-homo, many other precede it such as Carl Linnaeus', a Swedish scientist, who created the field of taxonomy in 1735, which he divided people into 4 species (Europaeus Albus, Americanus Rubescens, Asiaticus Fuscus, Africanus Niger), based on skull & skin pigmentation.
All his taxonomy is still used in modern taxonomy with the exception of this category being tampered with to list everything as just H. Sapiens.
I have instead divided them based on a maximum 0.1FST genetic distance.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
20210807_Christian_Aryanism_Races_Poster.png
3.1 MB
The Six Races of Man—The Remaining Species of Homo Genus.
Adam, the first H. Sapiens, the pinnacle of God's creation, that stands out amongst the beasts as an intelligent, dominant and peculiar being.
Adam, the first H. Sapiens, the pinnacle of God's creation, that stands out amongst the beasts as an intelligent, dominant and peculiar being.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
Christianity and Eugenics:
Eugenics (from Greek εὖ (eû, “well”) + γένος (génos, “born”)) is the improvement of the human population via artificial selective pressure; through methods such as: selective breeding, sterilisation, genetic screening and segregation. While we speak of artificial means, eugenics is a naturally occurring process (albeit significantly slower) that has refined and improved the human population since our creation.
The philosophy of artificial eugenics was first developed by Francis Galton (Charles Darwin's cousin) and inspired by his cousin's theory of evolution. Eugenics works on the basic principle of increasing reproduction of ‘desirables’ and decreasing reproduction of ‘undesirables.’
While there are moral and biblically sound methods of eugenic artificial selective pressure, such as those prior listed, there are extremely immoral methods that contradict scripture, such as murder, through euthanasia, culling and abortion.
Murder, especially that of children (abortion), is wicked, depraved and under no circumstances is a biblically acceptable method of eugenics [Genesis 9:6, Job 24:14]; however preventative methods that stop the initial creation of undesirable offspring without any harm, is acceptable.
Eugenics was widely and openly practiced in the Western World in the early 20th century with major support from Christians who biblically justified it on the following principles:
—Honouring God’s Image— (Eugenics forbidden to alter our morphology and anatomy. [Genesis 1:27])
—Prevention of Suffering— (Responsibility to prevent suffering brought on by poor genetic health and disorders, which are all the product of mutations after our creation. [Acts 10:38; Luke 9:2])
—Stewardship of Creation— (Safeguarding God’s creation [Genesis 1] includes maintaining the ecological balance of the natural world, which includes population improvement, which is already employed for flora and fauna for increased usefulness and condition hardening.)
—Healthfulness— (Responsibility to maintain the health of our bodies, including genetic health.)
—God's Laws of Nature— (In nature the fitter better perpetuate their genes among their population which makes the population fitter.)
—Be Fruitful and Multiply— (The reckless breeding of the unfit is not fruitful, God created Adam as a thoroughbred which shined over the world like a light among the darkness as the pinnacle of His creation. [Genesis 1:28; 9:1,7])
A grand example of biblical eugenics is the selective breeding (arranged marriages) of the patriarches Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; three consecutive generations of selective breeding; which produced a superior Adamic stock in the land of Canaan.
Why should eugenics be employed for mankind?
Increased intelligence, ancestral purification, improved athletic ability, removal of genetic disorders, improved natural health, increased quality of life, increased life expectancy, decreased artificial health needs, decreased dietary and water requirements, improved immune system, increased resiliency to diseases, increased resiliency to climate and extreme temperatures, as well many other benefits.
All of these factors are already attributes of the White (Adamic) race as we are a product of naturally occurring eugenics, which has placed us genetically superior to all other creatures; all according to God's plan.
Eugenics (from Greek εὖ (eû, “well”) + γένος (génos, “born”)) is the improvement of the human population via artificial selective pressure; through methods such as: selective breeding, sterilisation, genetic screening and segregation. While we speak of artificial means, eugenics is a naturally occurring process (albeit significantly slower) that has refined and improved the human population since our creation.
The philosophy of artificial eugenics was first developed by Francis Galton (Charles Darwin's cousin) and inspired by his cousin's theory of evolution. Eugenics works on the basic principle of increasing reproduction of ‘desirables’ and decreasing reproduction of ‘undesirables.’
While there are moral and biblically sound methods of eugenic artificial selective pressure, such as those prior listed, there are extremely immoral methods that contradict scripture, such as murder, through euthanasia, culling and abortion.
Murder, especially that of children (abortion), is wicked, depraved and under no circumstances is a biblically acceptable method of eugenics [Genesis 9:6, Job 24:14]; however preventative methods that stop the initial creation of undesirable offspring without any harm, is acceptable.
Eugenics was widely and openly practiced in the Western World in the early 20th century with major support from Christians who biblically justified it on the following principles:
—Honouring God’s Image— (Eugenics forbidden to alter our morphology and anatomy. [Genesis 1:27])
—Prevention of Suffering— (Responsibility to prevent suffering brought on by poor genetic health and disorders, which are all the product of mutations after our creation. [Acts 10:38; Luke 9:2])
—Stewardship of Creation— (Safeguarding God’s creation [Genesis 1] includes maintaining the ecological balance of the natural world, which includes population improvement, which is already employed for flora and fauna for increased usefulness and condition hardening.)
—Healthfulness— (Responsibility to maintain the health of our bodies, including genetic health.)
—God's Laws of Nature— (In nature the fitter better perpetuate their genes among their population which makes the population fitter.)
—Be Fruitful and Multiply— (The reckless breeding of the unfit is not fruitful, God created Adam as a thoroughbred which shined over the world like a light among the darkness as the pinnacle of His creation. [Genesis 1:28; 9:1,7])
A grand example of biblical eugenics is the selective breeding (arranged marriages) of the patriarches Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; three consecutive generations of selective breeding; which produced a superior Adamic stock in the land of Canaan.
Why should eugenics be employed for mankind?
Increased intelligence, ancestral purification, improved athletic ability, removal of genetic disorders, improved natural health, increased quality of life, increased life expectancy, decreased artificial health needs, decreased dietary and water requirements, improved immune system, increased resiliency to diseases, increased resiliency to climate and extreme temperatures, as well many other benefits.
All of these factors are already attributes of the White (Adamic) race as we are a product of naturally occurring eugenics, which has placed us genetically superior to all other creatures; all according to God's plan.
Forwarded from Restored Puritanism — Fides et Gens, Inseperable.
1 Corinthians 15:39
³⁹ NON OMNIS CARO, EADEM CARO: SED ALIA HOMINVM, ALIA PECORVM, ALIA CARO VOLVCRVM, ALIA AVTEM PISCIVM.
³⁹ All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.
³⁹ NON OMNIS CARO, EADEM CARO: SED ALIA HOMINVM, ALIA PECORVM, ALIA CARO VOLVCRVM, ALIA AVTEM PISCIVM.
³⁹ All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.