Questions and Suggestions:

Leave a comment to this post if you have a: question, suggestion, or would just like to see an in-depth analysis; on any topic regarding Christianity, theology, doctrine, textual criticism, Christian Aryanism itself or even anthropology relating to the faith!

I'll take your queries with the utmost seriousness and try my best to accurately and concisely answer it with a post on the channel for everyone to learn as well!

-------------------

Before asking, make sure it isn't already covered below!
- FAQ (Many questions)
- Was Jesus White?
- Was Christianity the cause of the Dark Age?
- Why was pork banned?
- Is evolution/ old earth contradictory to the bible?
- What is the Real Presence?
- What makes a Saint?
- Was the Harlot of Jericho, Jesus' ancestor?
- Cessationism Vs Continuationism?

Or check out our other content:
- Codex Amiatinus (Project)
- CA Oath
- Six Solas
- Boeric Covenant
- Christmas
- —nym

Is there support for a triune God (Trinity) in the Old Testament?
Yes.


Isaiah 48:12-16 [Old Testament] ¹⁷⁶⁹ᐟᴷᴶⱽ
¹² Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, my called; I am he; I am the first, I also am the last.
¹³ Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: when I call unto them, they stand up together.
¹⁴ All ye, assemble yourselves, and hear; which among them hath declared these things? The LORD hath loved him: he will do his pleasure on Babylon, and his arm shall be on the Chaldeans.
¹⁵ I, even I, have spoken; yea, I have called him: I have brought him, and he shall make his way prosperous.
¹⁶ Come ye near unto me, hear ye this; I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I: and now the Lord GOD, and his Spirit, hath sent me.

------------------

The person speaking created the world, but also called upon God and his Spirit; who sent Him.
We see 3 distinct people, I, Lord and Spirit; who are all God, a single God, all written in the Old Testament. The consistency between the Old and New Testament is flawless.

Who was sent by both God and His Spirit? "now the Lord GOD, and his Spirit, hath sent me."
Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ who while the cross was pierced by a spear.

------------------

Zechariah 12:10 [Old Testament] ¹⁷⁶⁹ᐟᴷᴶⱽ
¹⁰ And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.

Matthew 28:19 [New Testament] ¹⁷⁶⁹ᐟᴷᴶⱽ
¹⁹ Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

------------------
Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post

What is the Origin of Souls?
(Excerpts taken from the Christian Aryan Catechism)

In determining the origin of human souls, Christian theologians have adhered to 5 main theories.

Creationism
- every individual soul is created and given by God at birth; adherents differ on the moment of soul creation, whether it is conception, implantation or birth. Advocates include Saint Jerome and John Calvin and the Catholic Church, by the magisterium in the instruction Dignitas Personae; and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, 366, which states "The Church teaches that every spiritual soul is created immediately by God— it is not 'produced' by the parents…."

Reincarnation
- (also known as rebirth or transmigration) every individual is inhabited by a soul from a previous person. This view falls short as it doesn't account for the actual initial creation of souls and would beg to question if there is a limited number of souls available.

Pre-Existence
- every individual soul was either eternal or was created at some point prior to material existence. Despite advocates like Origen of Alexandria, Pre-Existence was condemned as heresy in the Second Council of Constantinople in ᴬᴰ553. It is still followed by the Mormon Church today.

Traducianism
- every individual obtains their soul from their parent/s, who it is transmitted from. Originally developed by Tertullian of Carthage, the name was coined in reference to a "grape vine" where all souls are a part of the same vine which originates with the root Adam. Despite it's wide usage, it however has some paradoxical shortcomings, such as: the blurry-lines between if there is only one soul we all share (Adam's) or if humans have individual souls; and if this soul could be transmitted into fauna (soulless creatures) through successful carnal propagation. An example of this fauna propagation issue is that a race-mixed child (as well as any inter-Adamite/ inter-species union) would have a full soul, be able to pass that on and be a beneficiary to the promises of the New Covenant, due to receiving their soul from their Adamic parent.

Generationism
- every individual soul is the product of both their parents souls; that propagation is of the whole person.
Ramifications of this doctrine which solve the issues of Traducianism (which Generationism is based on), is that just like only two bodies can produce body-offspring; only two souls can produce soul-offspring. Successful offspring from a body with a soul and a body without a soul (such as fauna, or race-mixing) would only propagate bodies with no souls.

Which is true?
We must simply look at scripture. There is only one verse where a soul is directly created by God; Adam's creation [Genesis 2:7]. Not even Eve's soul was created, Eve was only and wholly created from the substance of Adam [Genesis 2:21-23], both her body and soul came from Adam. Between them, they propagate both souls and bodies of Adam; which is why it was important for them to be fruit and multiply [Genesis 1:28]. Later it is mentioned that souls came from Jacob's loins [Genesis 48:26], supporting soul propagation.

Scripture clearly shows Generationism to be true.

[Tertullian: On the Resurrection of the Flesh: Chapter 45] "The two are no doubt produced by human parents of two substances, but not at two different periods; rather they are so entirely one, that neither is before the other in point of time."

------------------
Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post

The Christian God IS NOT the same God as the Jewish nor Muslim God.
Our God is triune and is the same God in both the Old and New Testament.

Old Testament:
- Plural nouns with singular verbs (triune) [Genesis 1:1; Isaiah 54:5]
- Self-reference in plurals [Genesis 1:26; Genesis 3:22; Genesis 11:7; Isaiah 6:8]
- Explicit mention of persons in Trinity [Isaiah 48:16-17]
- Specifically mentions God The Father [Isaiah 63:16; Malachi 2:10]
- Specifically mentions God The Son [Psalm 45:6-7; Psalm 2:6-7; Psalm 2:12; Proverbs 30:4]
- God The Son has divine titles [Isaiah 9:6; Jeremiah 23:5-6]
- Specifically mentions The Holy Spirit [Genesis 1:2; Genesis 6:3; Isaiah 11:2-3; Isaiah 48:16-17; Isaiah 61:1; Isaiah 63:10]
- The Trinity is foreshadowed in benedictions [Genesis 48:15-16; Numbers 6:24-27; Isaiah 6:3]

New Testament:
- Literal mentions of the Godhead [Acts 17:29; Romans 1:20; Colossians 2:9]
- Three distinct persons of a single God who interact with each other [Matthew 3:16-17. 12:32. 17:5; Luke 3:21-22. 4:1; John 1:1-3. 6:27. 14:16-17, 26. 15:26. 16:7-16; Romans 9:5; 1 Corinthians 8:6; 2 Corinthians 4:6. 13:14; Colossians 1:15-17; Galatians 4:6; Ephesians 1:13. 2:18; Titus 2:13-14; Hebrews 1:1-3. 9:14; 1 Peter 1:2]
- Commanded to baptize in the name of all 3 [Matthew 28:19]
- (All 3 are mentioned specifically hundreds of times, so have not included a list of verses for this)

An interesting assertion of Spanish theologian Michael Servetus (ᴬᴰ1511-1553) who argued against use of the Trinity:
"In his first two books (De trinitatis erroribus, and Dialogues on the Trinity plus the supplementary De Iustitia Regni Christi) Servetus rejected the classical conception of the Trinity, stating that it was not based on the Bible. He argued that it arose from teachings of Greek philosophers, and he advocated a return to the simplicity of the Gospels and the teachings of the early Church Fathers that he believed predated the development of Nicene trinitarianism. Servetus hoped that the dismissal of the trinitarian dogma would make Christianity more appealing to believers in Judaism and Islam, which had preserved the unity of God in their teachings."

Why would it be difficult for Jews and Muslims to convert to Christianity? Because we don't believe in the same God.
As we have demonstrated above, the Christian God, the triune God, is: the God of the Old Testament, the God of the New Testament, the Christian God, the God of our people without the slightest deviation. The Jewish and Muslim Gods however are none of these.
God has not changed and we have preserved Him.

------------------

The Triune Christian God is the God of our people and always has been.

------------------
Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post

Generationism:
(Full excerpt from the Christian Aryan Catechism)

is a theological doctrine regarding the Origin of Soul, that states a persons soul is the combined product of both their parents souls; much the same as their body being the combined product of both their parents bodies; that propagation is of the entire individual.

This doctrine stresses the union of both our soul (immaterial) and our body (material), while not the same, is comparable to the Hypostatic Union of Jesus.

While it is true that ultimately our bodies aren't eternal and we will live beyond them as solely our souls, the body is the conduit for which souls are propagated.

Soft advocates for Generationism include Saint Gregory of Nyssa, Macarius, Rufinus and Nemesius.

Ramifications of this doctrine which solve the issues of Traducianism (which Generationism is based on), is that just like only two bodies can produce body-offspring; only two souls can produce soul-offspring. Successful offspring from a body with a soul and a body without a soul (such as fauna, or race-mixing) would only propagate bodies with no souls.

To prove this, we must simply look at scripture. There is only one verse where a soul is directly created by God; Adam's creation [Genesis 2:7]. Not even Eve's soul was created, Eve was only and wholly created from the substance of Adam [Genesis 2:21-23], both her body and soul came from Adam. Between them, they propagate both souls and bodies of Adam; which is why it was important for them to be fruitful and multiply [Genesis 1:28]. Later it is mentioned that souls came from Jacob's loins [Genesis 46:26], supporting soul propagation.

While loosely said in support of Traducianism, Tertullian thoughts best suited Generationism [Tertullian: On the Resurrection of the Flesh: Chapter 45] "The two are no doubt produced by human parents of two substances, but not at two different periods; rather they are so entirely one, that neither is before the other in point of time."

What does Generationism mean for Christianity? That only those unadulterated of Adam have souls, the White race. There is no opportunity to have a soul given to you directly by God and no method to breed in a soul to another people.

------------------
Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post

Christian One Drop Purity

While many point to Deut 23:2 as proof of this, these laws are actually annulled at the death of Jesus. Romans 7: "if her husband be dead she is free from that law... ye also are dead to the law by the body of Christ".

However Romans 11 shows who salvation is for: "Has God not rejected his people? Absolutely not! For I too am an Israelite... Now I am speaking to you Gentiles... if the fruitfruit (branch) is holy, so too is the lump (root) and if the root is holy, so too are the branches."

What does this mean? "the Israelites (branch) are holy, so too is Adam (root); Adam (root) is holy, so too are his descendants (branches)".

We can clearly see this is stating only those of Adam are saved, but as having a holy root makes the entire tree holy, having a root that is not holy, makes the entire tree not holy. This means to be holy is to only descend from Adam, nothing else.
This aligns with the doctrine of Generationism where a soul cannot propagate outside pure (White) Adamic blood.

Why did God flood the earth?
Race-mixing. [High Res]

Almost immediately after the pinnacle of God's creation, Man; the firstborn, Cain would take a wife from the humanoid beasts [Gen. 4:17]. Not only was Cain was in exile, having no access to Adamic women, this wife was prior to the birth of any Adamic women [Gen. 5:4].

Both populations would grow and become large enough to encroach on each others territory, inevitably leading to mixing. The mixed would grow and continue adulterating the pure, perpetually.

This adulteration would reach catastrophic levels, that God was needed to step in [Gen. 6]. God would save Noah, the only man left who was both pure in ancestry and faith [Gen. 6:4]. It is important to know he was saved for being pure in both ancestry and faith, as many others would be pure in ancestry only, such as Noah's sons and their wives; and many other Adamites.

The purpose of the flood was to protect and isolate Noah and his family. Although many Cainites and Adamites died, many would survive.

The Appearance of Mother Mary:

The oldest extant written account on the appearance of Mary, the Mother of Jesus, is by Epiphanius Monachus of Constantinople, ᴬᴰ790. A monks job is to copy and reproduce texts for preservation, so it is likely based on a much older text.

Mary, as Jesus' only material parent having this appearance proves the authenticity on accounts which claim the same for Jesus.

Patrologiæ Græca 120:191-194 Epiphanii Monachi - De Vita B. Virginis: 6
Mariam... triticei coloris erat, flavis crinibus, oculis flavis et pulchris, nigris superciliis, justo naso, longis manibus, longis digitis, longo vultu, divinæ gratiæ, et speciei plena, fastus inimica, et comptus, ornatusve, et mollitiei.

Greek Church Fathers 120:191-194 Epiphanius Monachus - On The Life Of The Virgin: 6
Mary... complexion fair and beautiful like wheat, hair blonde, eyes fair, eyebrows dark, nose straight, with long: hands, fingers, and face; body full of divine grace, pride her enemy and embellished with quality hairdress.

Does the bible promote universalism/ inter-race unity? Absolutely not.

Often detractors will quote the following verses as proof that the bible accepts all races, without actually properly reading and understanding them.

Galatians 3:28
There is neither Jew (demonym) nor Greek (demonym), there is neither bond (class) nor free (class), there is neither male (sex) nor female (sex): for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Colossians 3:11
Where there is neither Greek (demonym) nor Jew (demonym), circumcision (class) nor uncircumcision (class), Barbarian (class), Scythian (demonym), bond (class) [nor] free (class): but Christ [is] all, and in all.

These terms denote all of Adam regardless of class, status, culture, geography or sex, are all one in Christ. It is universalism among only Adamkind, the White race.

It does not extend this across species or races, only those of Adam. It is clearly shown in scripture that only Adam and his kin can be saved [Romans 11].

For the detractors: let me know when you come across a verse that says: "there is no chimpanzee nor man (Adam)".

------------------

There is neither English nor German, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female: for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

------------------
Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post

Does the bible condemm homosexuality and pederasty?
Yes.

It may come as a shock, but Christianity is the only religion that has a negative view on and condemns both homosexuality and pederasty (pedophilia).

1. — God destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah [Genesis 19:1-11] from which the term "sodomite" (homosexuality) gets it's name from.
These cities weren't just destroyed for homosexuality, but for all kinds of sexual immorality, including incest, bestiality and pederasty.

2. — The bible condemns all homosexuals to death [Leviticus 18:22; 20:13].
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."

3. — Paul states in his letters to the Corinth Church and Timothy, that homosexuals and the sexual immoral will not see the Kingdom of Heaven [1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:10].
Recently atheists have attempted to poison this by arguing that the Greek word used here does not mean homosexuality.
The word used here is "αρσενοκοιται". If we look to the Septuagint and go to the verses that condemn homosexuality [Leviticus 18:22] we see "ἄρσενος οὐ κοιμηθήσῃ". Comparing the two, we can see that the word used in Paul's letters is this exact same phrase compounded into a single word.
It is without doubt this refers to homosexuality of any kind, including male pederasty.
- 1 Corinthians 16:9 — [αρσενο][κοι]ται
- Leviticus 18:22 — [ἄρσενο]ς οὐ [κοι]μηθήσῃ

4. — In Pauls letter to the Roman Church, he condemns homosexuality again; describing it as a vile act [Romans 1:26-27].
"vile affections... men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another"

5. — Jesus himself states that it would be better for child offenders (abusers) to have a millstone around their neck and for them to be cast into the ocean; this including pederasty of any kind [Matthew 18:6; Mark 9:42; Luke 17:2].
"whoever shall offend one of these little ones... it would be better that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

------------------
Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post

No Miscegnation — A Commandment of God.

The 6th Commandment:
(7th in some numbering systems)
600ᴮᶜ Hebrew: לֹ֣֖א (lo) תִּֿנְאָֽ֑ף (naaph)
300ᴮᶜ Greek: ου (ou) μοιχεύσεις (moicheuseis)
ᴬᴰ400 Latin: non moechaveris
English: no (something?)

Little is known about the meaning and etymology of this word in all 3 languages, and it's definition is assumed by interpreting it's context; which is extremely subjective due to it's very rare use.

What we do know is the word moechaveris is directly transliterated from the Greek μοιχεύσεις, indicating Latin did not have a word that accurately depicted it's meaning and had to loan the word; which is interesting considering Latin has many words to refer to extramarital affairs; the definition most modern scholars ascribe to the word.

On the other hand, the word μοιχεύσεις is a translation of the Hebrew תִּֿנְאָֽ֑ף, indicating what μοιχεύσεις meant is what Greek speaking Hebrews around 300ᴮᶜ understood תִּֿנְאָֽ֑ף to mean.

Is there any surviving texts around this time period which use any of these words, which we can determine the true definition from?
In fact there is: History of Animals by Aristotle, written 350ᴮᶜ.

Aristotle is a very well renowned and respectable historian, philosopher and polymath; who is known not to be sloppy in his work, and given his usage of the word is at approximately the same time (this also being the earliest usage and prior to the Septuagint) we can trust his usage would be accurate to it's definition.

History of Animals:
Greek: "Ἔτι δ' ἄλλο γένος ἐστὶν ἀετῶν οἱ καλούμενοι γνήσιοι. Φασὶ δὲ τούτους μόνους καὶ τῶν ἄλλων ὀρνίθων γνησίους εἶναι· τὰ γὰρ ἄλλα γένη μέμικται καὶ μεμοίχευται ὑπ' ἀλλήλων, καὶ τῶν ἀετῶν καὶ τῶν ἱεράκων καὶ τῶν ἐλαχίστων."
English: "There is another species called the 'true-bred'; people say that these are the only true-bred birds to be found, that all other birds-eagles, hawks, and the smallest birds-are all spoilt by the interbreeding of different species."

The word here με(μοίχευ)ται, is a conjugated form of the word (μοιχεύ)σεις; which Aristotle literally uses it to refer to interbreeding, mongrelisation or miscegnation between different bird species.

Given this information, it is beyond a shadow of a doubt that the sixth (or seventh) commandment of God reads:
"THOU SHALT NOT MISCEGENATE"

Who are the Adamic people?

We have extensively spoken about how the Covenants and promises of the bible are only addressed to Adam and his unadulterated progeny, who alone have souls.
- Adamic one-drop purity [Romans 11].
- Generationism, Soul Origin/ Propagation.
- Noah's flood to purge mixed mongrels.

But who are these people today?
Adam was a White man and his progeny, the Adamic people are the White race.

This is shown by:
- the etymology of Adam's name which describes him as hyperdepigmentised [Strongs Concordance H119-121] ❝to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:—be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).❞ This would mean Adam, had a ❝red❞ colour to his complexion that is associated with the ability to blush (only Whites can universally blush).
- the consumption of cow dairy by Adamic people [Genesis 18:8; Song of Solomom 5:1; Isaiah 7:22], showing lactose tolerance, a trait very rare among nonwhite populations but universal among Northern Europeans.
- the phenotypical traits of Adamic people are unique to modern Europeans [Genesis 25:25; 1 Samuel 16:12. 17:42; Psalm 51:7; Song of Solomon 5:10. 5:12. 7:4; Isaiah 29:22. Jeremiah 30:6. Lamentations 4:7] Spurious[Genesis Apocryphon (1Q20) col 20; 1 Enoch 106.2]
- the fair phenotype (blonde/ blue eyed) of Jesus Christ Himself, who had a pure lineage directly to Adam. [Revelation 1:14-16; Qu'ran (Sahih al-Bukhari 7128); Emerald of Tiberius Caesar; Paintings by John Sartain, based on the Emerald] Spurious[Description of Publius Lentullus; Archko Volume; Letter from Pontius Pilate to Tiberius Caesar]
- the fair phenotype (blonde/ blue eyed) of Jesus' mother Mary, His only material parent. As blonde/ blue eyed is recessive, Jesus couldn't have any other appearance [Patrologiæ Græca 120:191-194 Epiphanii Monachi - De Vita B. Virginis: 6].
- the etymology and origin of the word Arab (e'rab) meaning two things: the mixed mongrels, and to darken; showing that for an Adamite to mix, would mean to darken his complexion [Strongs Concordance H6148-6155].
- Jesus' disciples, the Apostles, only spread to and evangelized White nations and regions inhabited by Whites. They spread to the furthest White inhabited regions, but neglected non-white inhabited regions that were local.
- the sixth commandment of God that forbids race-mixing.

What is the Bible? And it's purpose and standing with science?

The Bible is the Genesis (origin) of Adamkind and the history of God's action in the world among the faithful line of Adamkind; accounting two main portions of our history: our fall and our redemption.

Understanding what the Bible actually is and what knowledge you are suppose to receive from it, is important. It's not a Mathematics, Physics or Chemistry textbook; so you shouldn't expect to find all the answers to those fields of science within, and you shouldn't expect to find confirmations for certain scientific concepts such as if the Earth is flat or round, or if biological adaption truly occurs (evolution); this we can scientifically observe.
It is also not an exhaustive history textbook on the complete history of the universe nor the complete history of all of Adamkind; only the concise history of our origin, and the concise history of God's interaction with the faithful line of Adamkind.

Science and exhaustive history are things we can discover and study outside of scripture.
We understand that scripture is infallible (absolute truth), so there can be no contradictions nor paradoxes within scripture and between scripture and observable truth (science).

Should a contradiction arise between scripture and observable truth (science) or within themselves; either man's interpretation of scripture is false, or man's understanding of science is false. Only man is fallible.

This isn't against the concept of Sola Scriptura; for Sola Scriptura is merely that scripture alone is sufficient to delineate how Man can be saved and that scripture alone has insight into the Praeternatural.
For knowledge outside this scope of Soteriology and Praeternaturalogy; we must observe, study and test with scientific methods; whilst being vigilant that no contradiction to scripture can truthfully occur.

A Christian has nothing to fear from the study of science; as Christians stand behind truth, we have no need to live in lies as others depend on. The delineation of science will always vindicate God and our faith, as it was built upon truth alone.

Every major discovery or advancement in the fields of science for the past two thousand years, whether in health, physics, chemistry or archeology, was the work of White Christian men.
Christians advanced this world to the technological levels we see today, and it only decays now that White Christian men are becoming scarce.

------------------
Have a question? Feel free to comment it on our questions and answers post

Sectarianism, another Brother War.

In this day and age, the children of God divide themselves amongst their Churches, personal interpretations, practices and culturally fabricated White ethnic boundaries; going as far to say only one set of these have any relationship with God.

It is time we stop dividing the congregation of God and stop dividing our race. There is only one congregation of God and that is the entire White race; His children.

It is unreasonable to believe we can all be one culturally homogeneous group of people and we should not expect it; differences will occur naturally, such as language, customs and beliefs. But gone should be the days that we look upon another White Christian and see them as anything other than our brother.

We all come from various Christian denominational and White ethnic backgrounds; but this is nothing new. During the Apostolic Age, there were many independent Churches from various White ethnic backgrounds; such as Jerusalem, Corinth, Philippi, Ephesus, Antioch, Constantinople, Alexandria, Carthage and Rome; gathering Greeks, Romans, Gauls, Germans, and many other White tribes. They weren't all culturally, religiously and ethnically identical but they recognised the one thing that mattered, that they were one in Christ.

While we understand many Churches and even our own brothers believe or teach falsehoods, we don't tear our brothers down and divide Christ among different groups of beliefs, but show our brothers the errors of their ways; learning and moving past it, together. Despite believing and teaching in error, this will not effect whether or not they go to heaven; for Jesus did not command us all to be learnt scholars without error, as all men are fallible.
Jesus only asked that we have faith in Him, that we believe He died and rose for us.

No matter the falsehoods you may unknowingly believe, none of that matters and none of that will bar you from Heaven, as long as you have faith in Him. Every single White Christian who believes in Christ, regardless of their denomination or beliefs, will meet each other in Heaven.

They say the gates of hell will not prevail against the Church [Matthew 16:18] (The word "Church" in Greek "ἐκκλησία" means congregation and referred to the entire Christian population of a given region.) which is correct but they were never talking about a building or religious political body; they were talking about faithful (Christian) White men, women and children.
They were saying the gates of hell will not prevail against our race.

Every White person who believes in the death and resurrection of Christ is a Christian; and we should be known as nothing but that, lest we put our differences before Christ.
I will not call you Catholic,
I will not call you Protestant,
I will not call you Orthodox,
because I know all you are is a Christian;
I will call you brother.

You are all sons of God.
For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
There is neither Pole nor Swede,
there is neither Protestant nor Catholic,
there is no male and female,
for you are all one in Jesus Christ.
[Galatians 3:26-28; Colossians 3:11]

Fides et Gens; Faith and Race.

Origin of the word Simian:
The word used in reference to non-human primates (apes).

From the Latin: Simia
Infections: simiae, simiam, simiarum, simias, simiis, simiae
Alternative: sīmius
From: sīmus (“snub-nosed”)
Etymology: Ancient Greek σῑμός (sīmós, “snub-nosed” or “flat-nosed”)
Definition: pejorative (slur)- monkey; ape; (derogatory term applied to men)

Appearing twice in scripture: 1 Kings 10:22; 2 Chronicles 9:21
[Same verse]: For the king had at sea a navy of Tharshish with the navy of Hiram: once in three years came the navy of Tharshish, bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes (simias), and peacocks.

Solomon likely had "Simia" slaves delivered.

Hebrew of word: [קוֺף]
Transliteration: qoph
Phonetic: kofe
Etymology: Combination of Sanskrit [कपि][kapi] and Egyptian loan-word [gôfë], [gi'f]; meaning "ape" or "foreigner".

Looking at usage of Simia in antiquity, it's mostly used for apes who can speak and perform tasks, but used interchangeably with monkeys, showing they didn't see a difference.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-15
Jews murdered the Lord Jesus. They persecute the followers of Christ and are our enemy.

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 2453: Ἰουδαῖος (Judæan)
…The apostle John, inasmuch as agreeably to the state of things in his day he looked upon the Jews as a body of men hostile to Christianity, with whom he had come to see that both he and all true Christians had nothing in common… even in his record of the life of Jesus not only himself makes a distinction between the Jews and Jesus, but ascribes to Jesus and his apostles language in which they distinguish themselves from the Jews, as though the latter sprang from an alien race… especially the rulers, priests, members of the Sanhedrin, Pharisees — he does not hesitate to style οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι…

Strange, that's an oddly specific thing for Saint John to do. It's as if the Jews were recognised as an entirely different race of people from Judahites, both who inhabited Judæa as citizens.

Such as the Idumæans who were known to have been conquered and joined the country as citizens [Josephus Antiquities 13:9.1; Strabo Geography 16:2.34] who instilled their own Idumæan king (Herod) [Josephus Antiquities 14:15.2] who used his position to fill the priest classes with fellow Idumæans, such as the Pharisees [Josephus Wars 2:8.2] who murdered Jesus. The same Idumæans who would start several wars with Rome [Josephus Wars 4:3.1-2] and be expelled to North Africa (Sephardic) and Khazaria (Ashkenazi).

It's almost like it's been right in front of our noses the entire time.