F.A.Q. Frequently asked questions on Christian Aryanism.

Stance on evolution and creation? Theistic Evolution.
Noah's flood? Younger Dryas 12kBC.
Stance on the Trinity? True with filioque clause.
What day is the Sabbath? Sunday.
Do you believe Europeans are the "real" Israelites? No, Israelites were a White tribe however.
Who are the Jews then? Idumaean Arabs
But Jews are called Jews! False identity; Jews also say they're White to blend in.
What is Judaism? Is Judaism the Old Testament religion? Idumaean Satanic religion unrelated to the Old Testament.
Jewish Blood Curse? Synagogue of Satan? Jews are Satan worshippers and murdered Jesus, forever cursing their blood line.
Are Jews descendants of Satan or demons? Jews are Satan worshippers, not actual mythical demons.
Can non-whites go to heaven/ be Christian? No, only White people go to heaven.
If non-whites aren't of Adam, who are they? Where do they go? They are fauna, go to Hades.
When was Jesus born? Jesus or Yahshua? 25th Dec 1ad, Jesus.
Serpent Seed/ Dual-Seed Doctrine? A false and disgusting heresy.
Is 1 Enoch canon? Are the Dead Sea Scrolls authentic? No, both are forgeries.
How does Christian Aryanism differ from Christian Identity? Please read full post.
Day of the Vow? What is that? Please read full post.
It's a Covenant? The tenth? What are the others? Please read full post.

Merry Christmas
—Matthew 1:21
—Dec, 25ᵀᴴ, 1ᴬᴰ
Today is the day to get together with racial friends & family to celebrate the day 2020 years ago that the Son of God was born; no matter the lies (((they))) say to claim it didn't occur.

—Four Christians all independently calculated the same day for Jesus' birth, Saint Theophilus (176ᴬᴰ), Saint Iranaeus (202ᴬᴰ), Saint Hippolytus (204ᴬᴰ), Julius Africanus (221ᴬᴰ) before the feast of Sol Invictus was moved to Dec 25ᵀᴴ by Emperor Julian (274ᴬᴰ).
—Jesus was born in winter, the climate is mild and the Israeli Awassi desert sheep that Jesus was born amongst birth in early winter (Dec).
—Saturnalia was held several weeks prior to Christmas; it's timing being the only parallel makes this completely unrelated.
—Saint Nicholas was a real person (270ᴬᴰ) the Bishop of Myra, Lycia, Byzantine Empire, who was genuinely known for his gift-giving.
—It is fitting that Jesus would be born on the darkest day of the year as His birth ushered into the world the beginning of light.

T a k e t h e o a t h ʸ ᴮ

"The Jews wander over the entire earth, their backs bent over and their eyes cast downward, forever calling to our minds the curse they carry with them"
~ Saint Aurelius Augustine of Hippo, one of the most influential Christian theologians in hiistory.
https://christianaryanism.wordpress.com/2021/03/05/anti-semitic-church-leaders/

Martin Luther's Final Solution:
Ch 15, On The Jews and Their Lies

First, DESTROY THEIR PLACES OF WORSHIP
- to set fire to their synagogues or schools.

Second, DESTROY THEIR HOMES
- that their houses also be razed and destroyed.

Third, DESTROY THEIR RELIGIOUS TEXTS
- that all their prayer books and Talmudic writings, be taken from them.

Fourth, PERSECUTE THEIR LEADERS
- that their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of life and limb.

Fifth, PERSECUTE THEIR MOVEMENT
- that safe-conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews.

Sixth, REMOVE THEIR WEALTH FROM THEM
- that usury be prohibited to them, and that all cash and treasure of silver and gold be taken from them.

Seventh, ENSLAVE THEM
- putting a flail, an ax, a hoe, a spade, a distaff, or a spindle into the hands of Jews and letting them earn their bread in the sweat of their brow.

https://christianaryanism.wordpress.com/2021/03/05/martin-luthers-solution-to-the-jewish-problem/

Vegvísir, literally “The pointer of the way” or “Wayfinder”, is a symbol of Christian origin.

Old Icelandic:
“At maður villist ekki : geim þennan staf undir þinni vinstri hendi, hann heitir Vegvísir og mun hann duga þér, hefir þú trú á honum – ef guði villt trúa i Jesu nafni – þýðing þessa stafs er falinn i þessum orðum að þú ei i (…) forgangir. Guð gefi mér til lukku og blessunar i Jesu nafni.”

English:
“To avoid getting lost: keep this sign under your left arm, its name is Vegvísir and it will serve you if you believe in it – if you believe in God in the name of Jesus – the meaning of this sign is hidden in these words, so you may not perish. May God give me luck and blessing in the name of Jesus.”

https://christianaryanism.wordpress.com/2021/03/08/origins-of-the-vegvisir/

Just got a whole lot easier to follow this simple rule:
Any White who pays a non-white for goods or services is a race traitor.

1 Corinthians 6:19-20 ¹⁷⁶⁹ᐟᴷᴶⱽ
¹⁹ What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
²⁰ For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.

Christianity is the only faith where race and religion are inseparable.

Our race are the children of God; they are the only descendants of Adam, the son of God [Luke 3:38]; they are the only people in the Image and Likeness of God.
No matter how hard the non-white hordes larp or appropriate Christianity, our racial faith. They will never be any of this.

Reject the false dichotomy presented and embrace truth.

Hail Christ. Faith and Race.
Ave Christus. Fides et Gens.

California's new ethnic studies curriculum calls for the decolonization of American society and according to one author, a countergenocide against White Christians.

Why did the bible forbid the consumption of pork prior to the New Covenant?

After looking into pork based parasites, it makes sense why pork was forbidden in the bible, because there's much more species of pork tapeworm than for any other animal.
https://youtu.be/l403_H3yOyw

There is tapeworms identical and specific for beef, chicken, etc but no where near as many, and as common; and pork is especially protective of the parasite as pork muscle is very dense, which makes it easier for tapeworms to survive cooking, if not done right.

The issue with pork tapeworms is that they like to get into your brain, eat and build burrows for their larve. When this occurs, the persons behaviour typically changes drastically, from hallucinations, mood swings, losing grasp on reality, violence, self-harm etc. It's actually incredibly bad.

However you need not worry about this today, as it was only commonplace in antiquity due to lower hygiene, sanitary and farming standards. Today in the US, between 2008 and 2020, only 15 cases of this occured, and all fully recovered.

Although, knowing how pork tapeworms affect a person mentally, is this what was mistaken for "possession" in the past? Or does this have anything to do with Exorcism of the Gerasene demoniac? (Mark 5:1-20; Matthew 8:28-34; Luke 8:26-39) Where Jesus exorcises a demon/s out of a man and into a herd of swine, causing the swine to run down a hill into a lake and drown themselves.

Did Jesus exorcise severe brain embedded tapeworms? The man was in the vinicity of large pig herds, it's likely he could have got it from the meat, and is this why the herd was killed off?

Keep in mind, narratives from the New Testament are often spoken in allegories and metaphors. Representing tapeworms as demons could be to show what they cause you to do when they burrow and their larve feast.

Jesus regardless performed a miracle by healing the man and removing those tapeworms which had infested the mans mind so much so that the man was slicing himself up with stones because he was so mentally damaged.

This would ultimately explain why Jesus felt it necessary to slaughter an entire pig herd because of it, to rid the region of the source of their afflictions.

Were Romans more advanced than most medieval kingdoms? (Christian Kingdoms)
No.

Were the Dark Ages the result of Christianity?
No, in fact, Christianity brought Europe out of it.

___

The Romans were advanced for their time, but they were superseded by the 11th century. The reason is economy. And Imperial Rome sucked on economy. I mean, like a vacuum cleaner sucks.

The Roman Empire reached its pinnacle on economy during the reign of Five Good Emperors (from Nerva to Marcus Aurelius). The problem is that the Roman economy was basically a Raubwirtschaft - rapine economy: it was based on conquest, loot, plunder and slavery. Rome was doomed already at the start. Once the conquests ended, so did the cash flow. The result was at first deflation, which was then treated with inflation. And by 235 AD the Empire was bankrupt. Cue the Third Century Crisis and Empire breaking in three. The days of wine and roses were over long before Aurelianus stitched the Empire back together 278 AD.

True, Rome could field far larger armies than any Medieval kingdom, and it could build magnificient monumental buildings. Simply because Rome had free, easily coercible and easily floggable work force - slaves. Nothing is impossible in a slavery-based empire - as long as there is money.

And once the money runs out (as it historically did by AD 235) , the downhill begins. The only monumental building the Roman Empire did after AD 235 were the Aurelian Walls.

Slavery - the availability of gratis, easily coercible and easily floggable work force - stultified any technological advance in Rome. What’s the point of windmills when you have slaves to grind the quern-stones?

The Diocletian reforms saved the Eastern Empire, but the West was bankrupt. And when it was liquidated 476, the monetary economy had disappeared long ago and replaced by barter trade. The Dark Ages (476–800 AD) had begun.

The Dark Ages were “dark” because there are few literary documents surviving, and the reason is lack of writing medium. Papyrus trade collapsed, and papyrus rots away in the European climate. But the Dark Ages also saw spread of Christianity, abolition of slavery, centuries of technological innovation and foundation of Feudalism. They enabled the slow economic recovery.

By 800 AD the living standards in Europe had exceeded those of 476 AD (the collapse of the Western Empire). By 1000 AD they had exceeded those of the Five Good Emperors’ era. Yet the Eastern Roman Empire was the richest, strongest and most powerful state in Europe - and perhaps whole world - in 1000 AD.

Yes, Eastern Roman Empire survived - and thrived. Constantinople indeed was the second Rome. The Eastern Empire never collapsed; it was conquered from outside.

The High Middle Ages (1066 AD to 1356 AD) were centuries of innovation, growth, increase and economy. It is not wrong to say Capitalism was born during those centuries, and it made Europe rich. Paper was introduced, which meant spread of literacy like a wildfire.

Technology did now what slaves had done in the past. When labour is expensive and there are guilds, unions and stuff like that, price of labour becomes the scarcity factor, and you have an incentive to invent technology. And that made the Medieval kingdoms far more technologically and scientifically advanced than the Roman Empire.

What the Romans were good was jurisprudence. The Roman civil law is even today the basis of all European judicial systems with the notable exception of the Anglo-Saxon Common Law.

Is the idea of evolution and an old earth contradictory to the bible?

No, not at all however many will immediately claim the bible states everything was created in 1 week. But does it claim that?

The bible never says a week, it says it took 6 יוֹם for creation.
This word, transliterated as yom (H3117) while commonly associated with "day" is actually translated into a number of different lengths of time and words throughout the bible, including: "afternoon, age, always, battle, chronicle, continually, era, eternity, fate, forever, life, lifetime, period, perpetually, reign, time" and even "year" ironically.

The definition is "an unspecific length of time". The length of time is usually determined by the context. Genesis chapters 1-2 would likely be considered "era".

Let's go over creation while taking this into account.

Before creation — Genesis 1:1-2
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."

First Era: Light — Genesis 1:3-5
“Then God said, ‘Let there be light’; and there was light… …the first era”

Second Era: Firmament — Genesis 1:6-8
“Then God said, ‘Let there be a firmament…’ ...the second era”

Third Era: Earth, sea and vegetation — Genesis 1:9-13
“Then God said, ‘Let the waters… be gathered… let the dry land appear… Let the earth bring forth grass…’ …the third era”

Fourth Era: Sun, moon and stars — Genesis 1:14-19
“Then God said, ‘Let there be lights in the firmament… the fourth era”

Fifth Era: Birds and sea animals — Genesis 1:20-23
“Then God said, ‘Let the waters abound with… living creatures, and let birds fly…’ …the fifth era”

Sixth Era: Land animals and humans — Genesis 1:24-31
“Then God said, ‘Let the earth bring forth the living creature… Let Us make man… So God created man in His own image…” …the sixth era”

Seventh Era: The Sabbath — Genesis 2:1-3
“…And on the seventh era God ended His work which He had done, and He rested on the seventh era…”

Exodus 20:8-11
“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. For in six eras the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh era. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.”

We have no need to deny science since it ultimately supports our point of view every time.

From pork-based tapeworm "Taenia solium" causing Neurocysticercosis, which exhibits itself as neuropsychiatric disorders which give the outward appearance of demonic possession, to poetic biblical language supporting evolution and billions of years old earth, the bible is always vindicate when science is applied.

The bible is absolute truth, infallible. There are no contradictions, paradoxes and nothing that contradictions observable truth (science).

Only men are fallible. If there is any of the above fallacies, either your interpretation is wrong or your understanding of science is wrong.

Christianity has never been a science denier, it was always the leader in scientific advancement.

Wherever Christianity spread, it would build hospitals, schools and universities; bringing education and literacy to the European masses.

I think Christians should actually read the Bible for themselves and stop relying on some pansy behind a pulpit pandering for Jews. The Jews are an eternally cursed people according to the New Testament, there is no room for interpretation.

Matthew 27:24–25
So when Pilate saw that he was gaining nothing, but rather that a riot was beginning, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd, saying "I am innocent of this man’s blood; see to it yourselves." And all the people answered, ((("His blood be on us and on our children!")))

Consubstantiation vs Transubstantiation.
What are they and which is true?

[Taken from the Christian Aryan Catechism]

Transubstantiation is a theological doctrine taught in the Catholic Church. It is the belief that during the Eucharist the bread and wine transform and literally become the actual flesh and blood of Christ. This has no basis in scripture and was first taught/ invented by the Catholic Church using the word "transubstantiate", by the Fourth Council of the Lateran in ᴬᴰ1215.

Consubstantiation is a theological doctrine taught since the foundation of Christianity, that teaches that the substance of the bread and wine during the Eucharist coexists with the body and blood of Christ in the Eucharist; that the bread and wine are symbolic of the flesh and blood of Christ. Chapters 6 and 16 of the Gospel of John prove that Consubstantiation is authentic, that the bread and wine of the Eucharist is figurative/ symbolic of the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ and not literal. While the Gospel of John doesn't record the Eucharist itself, it records the rest of Jesus Christ's last supper discourse afterward. In this discourse Jesus Christ states His comments during the supper were figurative [John 16:25] and His disciples also recognised it was figurative [John 16:29]. When Jesus Christ states those who eat and drink of the bread and wine, have life in Him [John 6:53-57], He states this is spiritual and not literal [John 6:63]. Here is where Jesus actually states the purpose of the Eucharist; communion with Jesus [John 6:56].

The Real Presence of Christ during the Eucharist.
(Post edited for expanded information)
[Taken from the Christian Aryan Catechism]

Transubstantiation:
during the Eucharist the bread and wine transform and literally become the actual flesh and blood of Christ.
Origin: was first taught/ invented by the Catholic Church using the word "transubstantiate", by the Fourth Council of the Lateran in ᴬᴰ1215.

Consubstantiation:
during the Eucharist the substance of the body and blood of Christ are present alongside (coexists with) the substance of the bread and wine, which remain present.
Origin: part of the doctrines of Lollardy (14th century AD England).

Sacramental Union:
during the Eucharist the bread and wine are united with the flesh and blood of Christ. That the bread and wine are literally the actual flesh and blood of Christ.
Origin: Martin Luther in his 1528 Confession Concerning Christ's Supper.

Spiritual Presence:
during the Eucharist, the reality of Christ's body and blood do not come corporally (physically) to the bread and wine, but that "the Spirit truly unites things separated in space".
Origin: John Calvin

Memorialism:
during the Eucharist the bread and wine are symbolic of the flesh and blood of Christ. That the Eucharist is a memorial of the Last Supper.
Origin: The Bible and Early Church.

-----

Memorialism is the true theological doctrine regarding the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist; taught by the Early Church and revived by Huldrych Zwingli. It holds that during the Eucharist, the bread and wine are symbolic of the flesh and blood of Christ; and the Eucharist is performed in "remembrance" of Him without transformation or any physical presence. Christ is however really present during the Eucharist through His omnipresence, not the performance itself.

The Eucharist is performed in a sacramental and spiritual manner in which the physical objects and actions are the spiritual reminder of what Jesus had done and what He had instituted.
This comes from the the historical understanding of the Early Church which taught that sacraments are done in "contemplation of faith" as the "proclamation of salvation and the strengthening of faith in the hearts of believers".
The Eucharist is signifying the body and blood of Jesus, as a memorial of the Last Supper and the Passion with symbolic and meaningful elements, which is done by the ordinance of Jesus.

Chapters 6 and 16 of the Gospel of John prove that Memorialism is authentic, that the bread and wine of the Eucharist is figurative/ symbolic of the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ and not literal. While the Gospel of John doesn't record the Eucharist itself, it records the rest of Jesus Christ's last supper discourse afterward.
In this discourse Jesus Christ states His comments during the supper were figurative [John 16:25] and His disciples also recognised it was figurative [John 16:29].
When Jesus Christ states those who eat and drink of the bread and wine, have life in Him [John 6:53-57], He states this is spiritual and not literal [John 6:63]. Here is where Jesus actually states the purpose of the Eucharist; communion with Jesus [John 6:56].

Strange that the Jewish-Roman War was only between Romans and (((Idumæans))) with not a single mention of Judahites nor Israelites in general. It's almost like.... Jews (Idumæans) and Israelites aren't the same people.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Jewish%E2%80%93Roman_War