Forwarded from GEORGENEWS
In any investigation, you first need to identify who would benefit from the situation, or, as the investigators put it, who had the motive and the opportunity to commit a criminal wrongdoing. Let’s speculate on that a little. Would European states benefit from the disruption of the Nord Stream? Hardly so, because this would make them dependent on a pricier and extremely unreliable supplier. I mean the host country of the UN Headquarters. Except Polish, Czech, and Baltic politicians whom Russophobia has driven completely crazy, European experts cannot fail to realize – even amidst EU’s overriding anti-Russian hysteria – the danger of this scenario and its implications for the European economy. Baltic water area suffered considerable environmental damage. Marine navigation is under threat. Colleagues from Denmark and Sweden confirmed this in their respective letters to the Security Council.
Objective relevance of Nord Stream 1 and 2 and their contribution to Europe’s energy security was repeatedly underscored at the level of the highest officials of the EU and its member states. The European Commission has always regarded Nord Stream as a project of EU common interest, which had its complete political support. This pipeline system contributed greatly to diversifying LNG supply routes, just like Yamal-Europe and the Turkish Stream pipelines. When those pipes became operational, it allowed Europe to ease its dependence on transit gas deliveries from Ukraine, where authorities indulged in shady business practices or, simply stated, thievery.
For many years, the German leadership has been saying that the demand for LNG in Europe and Germany would only grow. Austrian authorities said back in 2021 that the Nord Stream supported the European energy security, and welcomed steps aimed at enhancing reliability of energy deliveries to Europe. Effects of the current energy crisis proved the case of all those who admitted the relevance of the Nord Stream for stable and predictable energy supply. Interruptions in gas supplies in 2022 caused by sanction-related actions of the European and American authorities are already negatively affecting the European industry, its profitability and competitiveness, provoking the emigration of skilled labor and the transfer of production capacities outside Europe (in particular, to the United States) Energy poverty is back on the agenda not only for developing, but also for developed states. Resumption of deliveries, primarily under long-term contracts, as Russia has and continues to offer, would make it possible to stabilize the situation in the manufacturing industries and avoid an energy collapse.
Next question is if Russia benefits from disrupting the Nord Stream. If we consider it in terms of sound logic rather than delusional fantasies that Russians are ready to do whatever to intimidate Europe, then the answer is no. There is no point for us to undermine the project which cost us huge investment and which would bring us considerable economic returns. By the way it were you, the West, who claimed that we profiteered from exporting energy resources while the prices spiked.
Now the most important question – does the United States benefit from what happened to the Nord Stream? Of course it does. American LNG suppliers now can celebrate a manifold increase of LNG deliveries to Europe. In political terms, the last pillar that maintained European energy independence was ruined. Amidst the energy crisis, European manufacturing facilities are being relocated to the United States, which receives foremost personnel, technology, industrial capacities – everything that consolidated Europe has been accumulating and developing for decades. The people of Europe will be left face-to-face with their problems. Across the ocean, nobody cares that a long, dark, and cold winter is looming for the European continent.
[...]
Objective relevance of Nord Stream 1 and 2 and their contribution to Europe’s energy security was repeatedly underscored at the level of the highest officials of the EU and its member states. The European Commission has always regarded Nord Stream as a project of EU common interest, which had its complete political support. This pipeline system contributed greatly to diversifying LNG supply routes, just like Yamal-Europe and the Turkish Stream pipelines. When those pipes became operational, it allowed Europe to ease its dependence on transit gas deliveries from Ukraine, where authorities indulged in shady business practices or, simply stated, thievery.
For many years, the German leadership has been saying that the demand for LNG in Europe and Germany would only grow. Austrian authorities said back in 2021 that the Nord Stream supported the European energy security, and welcomed steps aimed at enhancing reliability of energy deliveries to Europe. Effects of the current energy crisis proved the case of all those who admitted the relevance of the Nord Stream for stable and predictable energy supply. Interruptions in gas supplies in 2022 caused by sanction-related actions of the European and American authorities are already negatively affecting the European industry, its profitability and competitiveness, provoking the emigration of skilled labor and the transfer of production capacities outside Europe (in particular, to the United States) Energy poverty is back on the agenda not only for developing, but also for developed states. Resumption of deliveries, primarily under long-term contracts, as Russia has and continues to offer, would make it possible to stabilize the situation in the manufacturing industries and avoid an energy collapse.
Next question is if Russia benefits from disrupting the Nord Stream. If we consider it in terms of sound logic rather than delusional fantasies that Russians are ready to do whatever to intimidate Europe, then the answer is no. There is no point for us to undermine the project which cost us huge investment and which would bring us considerable economic returns. By the way it were you, the West, who claimed that we profiteered from exporting energy resources while the prices spiked.
Now the most important question – does the United States benefit from what happened to the Nord Stream? Of course it does. American LNG suppliers now can celebrate a manifold increase of LNG deliveries to Europe. In political terms, the last pillar that maintained European energy independence was ruined. Amidst the energy crisis, European manufacturing facilities are being relocated to the United States, which receives foremost personnel, technology, industrial capacities – everything that consolidated Europe has been accumulating and developing for decades. The people of Europe will be left face-to-face with their problems. Across the ocean, nobody cares that a long, dark, and cold winter is looming for the European continent.
[...]
Forwarded from GEORGENEWS
Proceeding from these simple and very logical points, let me ask the representative of the United States this one thing. Can you confirm, here and now, that your country has nothing to do with this sabotage?
Colleagues, of course we do not expect to identify and punish the perpetrators today. The Security Council is not a judiciary body and should assume no such tasks. So Russia stands for a comprehensive investigation that should clarify the true circumstances of what happened with the pipeline.
Today, we very much like to hear the opinion of our European colleagues, learn your official position. We hope that you will abstain from Russophobic and senseless spiel which you resorted to when we were talking about attacks on the Zaporozhye NPP by Ukrainian armed forces. Or should we anticipate a statement where you will say that after the “masochistic” shelling of the ZNPP where our forces are deployed, we started exploding our own pipelines?
It is obvious that a sabotage of such scale and complexity cannot be carried out by ordinary terrorists. We consider the assault against the Nord Stream pipeline as a premeditated sabotage of Russia’s key energy infrastructure facility. Such attack could not have been carried out without involvement of state or state-controlled entities. We will surely identify all who were complicit in this sabotage. Those who stood behind it cannot be considered as a non-side in an armed conflict. Neither can they count on a neutral status that Western states already violated. Besides, an international investigation of the incident can only claim to be objective if Russian experts take part in it. Also, we believe the investigation should involve not only Denmark and Sweden, but also representatives of the German side, because Germany is the main recipient of the LNG transported by the Nord Stream.
If involvement of certain states in those terrorist attacks is proven, this will mean deliberate escalation of the conflict. Colleagues, I hope all in this chamber realize to what dangerous line the perpetrators of this sabotage are driving us.
Thank you.
In response to the representative of the United States:
Mr.President,
I thank my American colleague for giving a straightforward answer to my question.
I asked: “Can you confirm here and now that your country has nothing to do with this sabotage?” What my American colleague has just said in this chamber is that the United States denies any involvement in this incident. I appreciate his response. But now that I have heard what you and also our British colleague said, I would like to ask another question. What exactly do you call Russian disinformation and conspiracy theories? We did not call anyone responsible before the investigation. We just cited some facts. You cannot deny that your president said what he said publicly, can you? We just provided some quotes of what he said.
NATO exercise BALTOPS in June 2022 near the island of Bornholm is a fact. Former Foreign Minister of Poland R.Sikorski publishing the tweet that I showed you, where he thanked the US for what had happened at the pipe is a fact. Launch of the Baltic Pipe connecting Norway and Poland is a fact. NATO speaking about sabotage and inadmissibility of strikes against its infrastructure is yet another fact. Those are mere facts. Are you going to argue that the current energy crisis objectively makes American energy suppliers more competitive? Is it also a conspiracy theory? No, this is economic reality. And objectively, the United States benefits from it in economic terms.
Finally, before our American colleague took the floor today, we had not thought of the Nord Stream incident as something connected to the situation around Ukraine. But now we see that our European colleagues perceive this sabotage, whoever may have committed it, as some sort of revenge for Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Well, I think this inference narrows down the list of suspects and can be of great help in the investigation.
Thank you.
###
t.iss.one/georgenews
Colleagues, of course we do not expect to identify and punish the perpetrators today. The Security Council is not a judiciary body and should assume no such tasks. So Russia stands for a comprehensive investigation that should clarify the true circumstances of what happened with the pipeline.
Today, we very much like to hear the opinion of our European colleagues, learn your official position. We hope that you will abstain from Russophobic and senseless spiel which you resorted to when we were talking about attacks on the Zaporozhye NPP by Ukrainian armed forces. Or should we anticipate a statement where you will say that after the “masochistic” shelling of the ZNPP where our forces are deployed, we started exploding our own pipelines?
It is obvious that a sabotage of such scale and complexity cannot be carried out by ordinary terrorists. We consider the assault against the Nord Stream pipeline as a premeditated sabotage of Russia’s key energy infrastructure facility. Such attack could not have been carried out without involvement of state or state-controlled entities. We will surely identify all who were complicit in this sabotage. Those who stood behind it cannot be considered as a non-side in an armed conflict. Neither can they count on a neutral status that Western states already violated. Besides, an international investigation of the incident can only claim to be objective if Russian experts take part in it. Also, we believe the investigation should involve not only Denmark and Sweden, but also representatives of the German side, because Germany is the main recipient of the LNG transported by the Nord Stream.
If involvement of certain states in those terrorist attacks is proven, this will mean deliberate escalation of the conflict. Colleagues, I hope all in this chamber realize to what dangerous line the perpetrators of this sabotage are driving us.
Thank you.
In response to the representative of the United States:
Mr.President,
I thank my American colleague for giving a straightforward answer to my question.
I asked: “Can you confirm here and now that your country has nothing to do with this sabotage?” What my American colleague has just said in this chamber is that the United States denies any involvement in this incident. I appreciate his response. But now that I have heard what you and also our British colleague said, I would like to ask another question. What exactly do you call Russian disinformation and conspiracy theories? We did not call anyone responsible before the investigation. We just cited some facts. You cannot deny that your president said what he said publicly, can you? We just provided some quotes of what he said.
NATO exercise BALTOPS in June 2022 near the island of Bornholm is a fact. Former Foreign Minister of Poland R.Sikorski publishing the tweet that I showed you, where he thanked the US for what had happened at the pipe is a fact. Launch of the Baltic Pipe connecting Norway and Poland is a fact. NATO speaking about sabotage and inadmissibility of strikes against its infrastructure is yet another fact. Those are mere facts. Are you going to argue that the current energy crisis objectively makes American energy suppliers more competitive? Is it also a conspiracy theory? No, this is economic reality. And objectively, the United States benefits from it in economic terms.
Finally, before our American colleague took the floor today, we had not thought of the Nord Stream incident as something connected to the situation around Ukraine. But now we see that our European colleagues perceive this sabotage, whoever may have committed it, as some sort of revenge for Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Well, I think this inference narrows down the list of suspects and can be of great help in the investigation.
Thank you.
###
t.iss.one/georgenews
Forwarded from il Donaldo Trumpo (il Presidento)
Rumble
🔴 PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP SAVE AMERICA RALLY LIVE IN WARREN, MI 10/1/22
Saturday, October 1, 2022: Join the RSBN broadcast crew LIVE from Warren, MI for all day coverage of President Donald J. Trump's SAVE AMERICA Rally in Warren, MI. Tune in starting at 12:00 PM ET! This
Forwarded from ### (AN0N)
Q+ WAS TALKING ABOUT MISINFORMATION AND DISINFORMATION (GOOD DROPS)
https://qalerts.app/?q=MISINFORMATION
https://qalerts.app/?q=DISINFORMATION
https://qalerts.app/?q=MISINFORMATION
https://qalerts.app/?q=DISINFORMATION
qalerts.app
Drop Search Results: MISINFORMATION
Search results for "MISINFORMATION". Welcome to the great awakening!
###
Q+ Thank you Yale PhD! An Ode to the greatest President ever, as charming and brilliant as he is clever! Lord only knew what he would endeavor, it’s clear as a bell, he’s a national treasure. The Deep State’s huge, the swamp even greater, They thought she’d…
Q+ "THEY WANTED TO SEE PAIN"
"WE MIGHT HAVE TO DO IT AGAIN" (RIGHT AFTERWARDS)
"WE MIGHT HAVE TO DO IT AGAIN" (RIGHT AFTERWARDS)
Forwarded from ###
Q+
Thank you Yale PhD!
An Ode to the greatest President ever,
as charming and brilliant as he is clever!
Lord only knew what he would endeavor,
it’s clear as a bell, he’s a national treasure.
The Deep State’s huge, the swamp even greater,
They thought she’d win and they’d inaugurate her,
And long before you came down that escalator,
You knew YUGE things would be happening later!
And so, in 500 characters or less,
I just want to say you’re simply the best!
WWG1WGA, and to All may God bless!
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 🙏 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Q🔥
THE GREATEST MILITARY INTELLIGENCE OPERATION OF OUR TIME
HISTORY WILL JUDGE YOU WELL.
Q
Who is this guy? -Q+
4th quarter, Patriots.
We fight together.
Q
Sponsor?
Not what you think.
Q
honored at the (you) Q, we are at the ready and the anon morale is very very high, lets do this!
UNITED WE STAND.
STRONG TOGETHER.
We are honored.
ANONS are selfless, nameless, faceless, fameless, and FEARLESS.
We are grateful.
Q
THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE WORLD ASKED ORDINARY MEN TO DO EXTRAORDINARY THINGS.
BAND OF ANONS
We serve at the pleasure of the President! (Q+)
We, thank you.
Shills only shill.
Patriots WIN.🇺🇸
Q
HOOAH!
Oscar worthy?
Q
@QSRDECODES
@QWO17
Thank you Yale PhD!
An Ode to the greatest President ever,
as charming and brilliant as he is clever!
Lord only knew what he would endeavor,
it’s clear as a bell, he’s a national treasure.
The Deep State’s huge, the swamp even greater,
They thought she’d win and they’d inaugurate her,
And long before you came down that escalator,
You knew YUGE things would be happening later!
And so, in 500 characters or less,
I just want to say you’re simply the best!
WWG1WGA, and to All may God bless!
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 🙏 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Q🔥
THE GREATEST MILITARY INTELLIGENCE OPERATION OF OUR TIME
HISTORY WILL JUDGE YOU WELL.
Q
Who is this guy? -Q+
4th quarter, Patriots.
We fight together.
Q
Sponsor?
Not what you think.
Q
honored at the (you) Q, we are at the ready and the anon morale is very very high, lets do this!
UNITED WE STAND.
STRONG TOGETHER.
We are honored.
ANONS are selfless, nameless, faceless, fameless, and FEARLESS.
We are grateful.
Q
THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE WORLD ASKED ORDINARY MEN TO DO EXTRAORDINARY THINGS.
BAND OF ANONS
We serve at the pleasure of the President! (Q+)
We, thank you.
Shills only shill.
Patriots WIN.🇺🇸
Q
HOOAH!
Oscar worthy?
Q
@QSRDECODES
@QWO17