Most people believe all their taxes go towards hospitals, street lighting, bin collections and a plethora of other services. In fact ALL taxes and fines go into a Parliamentary Consolidated Fund, 5-10% of which goes on ‘Defence’ and the funding of illegal wars. These wars have cost the UK taxpayer £1.2TN since 2001 and killed 1.8M people (6M since WWII). It is illegal to pay tax if you believe any of your taxes are being used for the funding of criminal activities, such as genocide and crimes against humanity. You can withhold tax lawfully using a Trust with the government listed as primary beneficiary. Details and forms at: www.ProbityCo.com
Make Wars History.
Make Wars History.
🔥4
As our banks print more money for more wars, pandemics and 'Green Opportunities', the debt on the counterfeiting increases annually, forcing the taxpayer to shell out £60BN in interst payments for loans of money from thin air. Nice work if you can fraud it. But does money really exist, or is it merely a creation on a bank's leger, in which case, why would we need to pay it back? https://www.attackingthedevils.com/post/empty-promises
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
Council tax challenges update
Most of this article seems on point but we do not agree that there are or will be military tribunals and this is not an argument we would run if dealing with this issue personally.
Also we have repeatedly said and shown that a council tax summons is issued as "in the criminal case of" and this point should be stressed to any court. If you are in a criminal case why are the criminal procedure rules not being followed? If the court wants to argue that it's a civil case it would seem prudent to ask why a summons is used. If the insistence is that somehow it's still a civil case and the powers to issue a summons somehow come from the local government act, the question to then ask is why are the civil procedure rules not being followed.
This article is right on this issue. Council tax hearings follow neither the criminal nor civil procedure rules, so they are not within "the law". They must therefore be operating within a star chamber set up, otherwise known as an administrative court, outlawed in this country for the purposes of hearing cases or handing out sentences.
One would assume the next step is perhaps to go for declaratory relief on this issue. Or see to where such a case could be appealed so the issues of due process and legal rules can be fully discussed.
On the issue of councils being corporations care is needed in the sense that they are statutory corporations, so one should know the difference.
On the point of issuing of summonses, this would seem settled law. It is a judicial process not an administrative one, and therefore these cases seem to fall on this issue alone. We have spoken about this before and will link the post regarding the same again in another post below this one.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/when-they-get-sloppy-we-get-evidence?r=rlr3
Most of this article seems on point but we do not agree that there are or will be military tribunals and this is not an argument we would run if dealing with this issue personally.
Also we have repeatedly said and shown that a council tax summons is issued as "in the criminal case of" and this point should be stressed to any court. If you are in a criminal case why are the criminal procedure rules not being followed? If the court wants to argue that it's a civil case it would seem prudent to ask why a summons is used. If the insistence is that somehow it's still a civil case and the powers to issue a summons somehow come from the local government act, the question to then ask is why are the civil procedure rules not being followed.
This article is right on this issue. Council tax hearings follow neither the criminal nor civil procedure rules, so they are not within "the law". They must therefore be operating within a star chamber set up, otherwise known as an administrative court, outlawed in this country for the purposes of hearing cases or handing out sentences.
One would assume the next step is perhaps to go for declaratory relief on this issue. Or see to where such a case could be appealed so the issues of due process and legal rules can be fully discussed.
On the issue of councils being corporations care is needed in the sense that they are statutory corporations, so one should know the difference.
On the point of issuing of summonses, this would seem settled law. It is a judicial process not an administrative one, and therefore these cases seem to fall on this issue alone. We have spoken about this before and will link the post regarding the same again in another post below this one.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/when-they-get-sloppy-we-get-evidence?r=rlr3
Martingeddes
When they get sloppy, we get evidence of crimes
Arrogance at being untouchable means they make mistakes and expose themselves
👍5
Forwarded from BioClandestine (BioClandestine)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dave Smith highlights a disturbing reality.
If civilians are responsible for the crimes of their governments, then the American citizenry are responsible for the deaths of MILLIONS.
This idea that the Palestinians deserve to die for what Hamas did… is absolutely insane.
Let’s see if Americans maintain this same energy when it’s revealed the US were responsible for SARS-CoV-2.
If civilians are responsible for the crimes of their governments, then the American citizenry are responsible for the deaths of MILLIONS.
This idea that the Palestinians deserve to die for what Hamas did… is absolutely insane.
Let’s see if Americans maintain this same energy when it’s revealed the US were responsible for SARS-CoV-2.
❤1👍1
Probity as featured in the Middle East Monitor: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231121-theres-a-taxing-time-ahead-in-britain-over-support-for-israel/
Middle East Monitor
There’s a taxing time ahead in Britain over support for Israel
...
And on Rumble:The UK taxpayer has been funding wars to the tune of £1,875/per taxpayer, per year since 2001. This has come at the cost of 2M lives. 5-10% of all taxes and fines go towards 'defence' - money that has in fact been used to pay for wars of agression and to subsidise the 'defence industry'. If 25% of people in the UK say they cannot afford Christmas, why are we funding wars? We have a right to say how our taxes are spent. Withhold tax lawfully. The will of the people is the law. https://rumble.com/v3z1qpj-probityco.com-stop-funding-wars-withhold-tax-lawfully.html
👍5
According to Bloomberg $5TN of ESG funding has gone on the 'defence' industry. Awkward. As of Q3 2023, over 1,200 ESG funds, pledged to uphold environmental, social, and governance standards - itself another transfer of wealth - have been diverted to invest in shares worth around $5 trillion in the 'defense' aka aggression sector. Hopefully this will lead to a load of lawsuits as the ESG transfer of wealth program was sold as having an 'ethical focus' on 'sustainability ideals'. Maybe they meant sustaining the arms industry. https://www.rt.com/business/588094-esg-funds-invest-arms-industry/
RT
Trading in death responsibly: ‘Woke’ funds funnel $5 trillion into arms industry
ESG funds, once known for socially responsible investing, have funneled trillions of dollars into defense stocks, raising ethical questions
This is a great site for those in the US who wish to help stop the genocide in Gaza: https://taxpayersforpeace.org/
The Independent Alliance (worth a look) aims to rid this country of the criminal elites and the overriding influence of the global oligarchy: https://theindependentalliance.org/
76% of Brits wish to see an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, yet OUR TAXES FUND THESE WARS. Withhold Tax legally and stop funding genocide. https://aoav.org.uk/2023/trading-in-trauma-do-united-kingdom-arms-exports-to-israel-violate-the-arms-trade-treaty-and-other-arms-control-regulations/
AOAV
Trading in trauma: do United Kingdom arms exports to Israel violate the Arms Trade Treaty and other arms control regulations? …
The UK's substantial arms exports to Israel has sparked controversy following allegations such weapons harming civilians in Gaza, raising legal and ethical concerns.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Since 2001, the UK government and our political, civil, judicial, military and corporate leaders have broken many of the major international and domestic criminal laws and treaties signed and ratified by Parliament that govern warfare and the use of armed force. Pippa Bartolotti argues that there is no UK department of defence, merely a department of war. And we fund it. MAKE WARS HISTORY. Withhold Tax Lawfully
👍5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The US 'Defense Budget' for 2023 came in at $877BN - more than the 10 other highest spending countries combined, including China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Germany. The 3.88BN alone sent to Israel to fund the Gaza war could instead have funded 451,735 public housing units, 1.322 M children receiving free or low-cost healthcare, 41,490 elementary school teachers, 10.8M households with electricity and 100,563 student loans. The Defense Budget does not defend the US. It subsidises the Defense Industry, lobbyists, defense contractors and bank loans. Taxpayers should have the right to decide how their money is spent. Withhold tax lawfully and stop funding wars.
👍2
Socks tax Xmas
101.5 KB
From Lawyers of Light: Following the end of the Napoleonic War in 1815, public mood of compliance with income tax rapidly evaporated.
In 1842 Peel re-introduced income tax at 7d in the pound on incomes over £150. This allowed him to remove import and export duties on more than 700 items.
In 2022/23, the UK government raised over £1,017 billion in receipts – income from taxes and other sources. This is equivalent to around 40% of the size of the UK economy, as measured by GDP, which is the highest level since the 1980s.
This New Year the resolution for all on this channel is "it's time to make income tax repugnant again".
In 1842 Peel re-introduced income tax at 7d in the pound on incomes over £150. This allowed him to remove import and export duties on more than 700 items.
In 2022/23, the UK government raised over £1,017 billion in receipts – income from taxes and other sources. This is equivalent to around 40% of the size of the UK economy, as measured by GDP, which is the highest level since the 1980s.
This New Year the resolution for all on this channel is "it's time to make income tax repugnant again".
