We are always 😳 when we read stories about people killing family members, friends or similar.
What we always forget instead is why such things happen ...
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/295
First of all, such homicide generally are huge different compared to other serious homicides ...
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/561
https://t.iss.one/RecidivismFacts/121
Obviously there are homicides with a possible reason and homicides with no reason at all, so again it's complex ... Let we consider now homicides with a possible reason ...
So already seeing all as similar is 💩
Now again, doing a crime as answer to a specific event / situation / believe IS NOT a justification! like we said previously
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/155
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/15
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/415
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/599
Why such things happen? Well, probably Lost showed exactly ... Why Kate killed her dad? Have you already forgot lost ....
Wayne Janssen was Kate's biological father, though he was likely unaware of this. He beat Kate's mother Diane, was an alcoholic, and made sexual advances toward Kate (which she vehemently rebuffed). He was killed by Kate when she blew up his house in 2001. At the time she killed him, she was aware of the fact he was her biological father. ("What Kate Did") https://perma.cc/7YQK-ZZ63
This is just one of 10000 examples, where probably KATE WOULD NEVER KILL ANOTHER PERSON! (if we exclude the topic 🛫 in the bank and escaping from 🚨) showing that doing a death sentence in such case is pretty shit. Such things need to be considered during a sentence. The reasons behind actions are huge important ...
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/576
We need learn from such reasons and events
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/45
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/47
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/44
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/42
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/34
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/41
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/576
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/470
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/386
2023? Well, how people are acting with other people are a great source of homicides! So think about that, before acting like 💩. Obviously this is not an excuse for homicides, but we cannot ignore such things!
Again, it's time people start to improve communication!
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/570
Such abuses and bad behaviours are the source of criminality and terrorism!
We need to think before acting
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/153
What we always forget instead is why such things happen ...
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/295
First of all, such homicide generally are huge different compared to other serious homicides ...
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/561
https://t.iss.one/RecidivismFacts/121
Obviously there are homicides with a possible reason and homicides with no reason at all, so again it's complex ... Let we consider now homicides with a possible reason ...
So already seeing all as similar is 💩
Now again, doing a crime as answer to a specific event / situation / believe IS NOT a justification! like we said previously
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/155
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/15
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/415
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/599
Why such things happen? Well, probably Lost showed exactly ... Why Kate killed her dad? Have you already forgot lost ....
Wayne Janssen was Kate's biological father, though he was likely unaware of this. He beat Kate's mother Diane, was an alcoholic, and made sexual advances toward Kate (which she vehemently rebuffed). He was killed by Kate when she blew up his house in 2001. At the time she killed him, she was aware of the fact he was her biological father. ("What Kate Did") https://perma.cc/7YQK-ZZ63
This is just one of 10000 examples, where probably KATE WOULD NEVER KILL ANOTHER PERSON! (if we exclude the topic 🛫 in the bank and escaping from 🚨) showing that doing a death sentence in such case is pretty shit. Such things need to be considered during a sentence. The reasons behind actions are huge important ...
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/576
We need learn from such reasons and events
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/45
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/47
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/44
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/42
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/34
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/41
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/576
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/470
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/386
2023? Well, how people are acting with other people are a great source of homicides! So think about that, before acting like 💩. Obviously this is not an excuse for homicides, but we cannot ignore such things!
Again, it's time people start to improve communication!
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/570
Such abuses and bad behaviours are the source of criminality and terrorism!
We need to think before acting
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/153
Telegram
Fatti sullo stupro e le leggi in Italia su Telegram by GRT : quando non ci sono pene decenti per un terrorista stupratore
CREPET: "Le RAGAZZE che MOLLANO su WHATSAPP!"🔥
Backup by @StuproFatti
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Backup by @StuproFatti
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Related to the previous example of homicide done by Kate
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/577
Again, the story is a bit more complex, because there is no just 👨👧 but even ✈️ and 🏥
Kate, having been promised that nobody would be hurt in the robbery, intervenes by shooting Jason in the leg as well as shooting his other two accomplices https://perma.cc/AQ2Q-HBB8
When Jason wanted to kill the hostage bank manager Mr. Hutton, Kate decided to prevent it by shooting Jason in the leg. Kate's true motive was to retrieve the toy airplane, and at the end of the flashback, she left with it, leaving behind the money, as well as Jason and the other robbers https://perma.cc/QWL4-J945
and about 🏥, he was not killed by her ...
Tom was accidentally killed by a stray bullet while driving with Kate, who was fleeing the police https://perma.cc/TQ6M-F756
Before the crash, Kate had spent many years fleeing the law after killing her abusive father. To achieve her goals, she would commit several other crimes and would turn to bank robbery, assault and seduction https://perma.cc/T85N-4MAN
She was otherwise even pretty empathic with the 🚜 ...
She then saved him by pulling him out from the burning wreckage, which allowed Mars to capture her https://perma.cc/5WBR-BNPH
Like she was pretty 🥰 otherwise ...
Just an example why considering the real story behind the homicide is HUGE IMPORTANT TO MAKE PROPER SENTENCES!
Sure, she did a crime, but there are people much worse than Kate, who really deserve a death sentence.
Kate is for sure NOT on the list of people that need a death sentence ...
Again, yes to death sentences
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit
https://t.iss.one/RecidivismFacts
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts
https://t.iss.one/BreivikDeathSentence
but NO to death sentences applied like shit
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit/622
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/483
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/478
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/504
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit/511
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit/321
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/1300
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/577
Again, the story is a bit more complex, because there is no just 👨👧 but even ✈️ and 🏥
Kate, having been promised that nobody would be hurt in the robbery, intervenes by shooting Jason in the leg as well as shooting his other two accomplices https://perma.cc/AQ2Q-HBB8
When Jason wanted to kill the hostage bank manager Mr. Hutton, Kate decided to prevent it by shooting Jason in the leg. Kate's true motive was to retrieve the toy airplane, and at the end of the flashback, she left with it, leaving behind the money, as well as Jason and the other robbers https://perma.cc/QWL4-J945
and about 🏥, he was not killed by her ...
Tom was accidentally killed by a stray bullet while driving with Kate, who was fleeing the police https://perma.cc/TQ6M-F756
Before the crash, Kate had spent many years fleeing the law after killing her abusive father. To achieve her goals, she would commit several other crimes and would turn to bank robbery, assault and seduction https://perma.cc/T85N-4MAN
She was otherwise even pretty empathic with the 🚜 ...
She then saved him by pulling him out from the burning wreckage, which allowed Mars to capture her https://perma.cc/5WBR-BNPH
Like she was pretty 🥰 otherwise ...
Just an example why considering the real story behind the homicide is HUGE IMPORTANT TO MAKE PROPER SENTENCES!
Sure, she did a crime, but there are people much worse than Kate, who really deserve a death sentence.
Kate is for sure NOT on the list of people that need a death sentence ...
Again, yes to death sentences
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit
https://t.iss.one/RecidivismFacts
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts
https://t.iss.one/BreivikDeathSentence
but NO to death sentences applied like shit
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit/622
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/483
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/478
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/504
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit/511
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit/321
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/1300
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Acid Attack to a person?
Well for us IS A DEATH SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE! if the dude has been found with enough proofs.
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW
Seriously are we still able to do such things?
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/426
It's time to stop to give criminals more human rights than innocent people!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/16
No matter what. Even with a death sentence the damages are not fixed ...
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/47
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/110
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/42
but at least prevented
https://t.iss.one/RecidivismFacts
Backup by @PrisonFacts
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Well for us IS A DEATH SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE! if the dude has been found with enough proofs.
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW
Seriously are we still able to do such things?
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/426
It's time to stop to give criminals more human rights than innocent people!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/16
No matter what. Even with a death sentence the damages are not fixed ...
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/47
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/110
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/42
but at least prevented
https://t.iss.one/RecidivismFacts
Backup by @PrisonFacts
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Well, now our statement about "Brevik is not showing any type of remorse" (Part 1)
Well, first we cannot say ANYTHING, because until now we haven't found the video about his reaction during the victim speeches ... this is huge important to know.
No matter, during the writing of the book he showed some emotions, after the attack nope (or at least we don't know, since you don't see him how he is reacting in prison too...). This not to defend him, but just to speak that with both sides in a neutral way ... because for us both sides are important ...
Second, making 😄 when victims are talking IS NOT OK AT ALL! even if you have a reason behind such killing. They are getting a double pain that will NEVER forget. They just remember the 😄
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/69
https://t.iss.one/CrimesTelegram/55
Already doing that before (maybe without victims) is not really ok
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/59
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/20
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/64
https://perma.cc/F3HQ-JPH6
but let we analyse WITH MULTIPLE PROSPECTIVE, because we hate people just looking thing from a victim prospective WHICH DOESN'T SHOW THE REALITY!
First, we prefer 10000x people saying i'm the killer, instead of bullshit just to make the court happy ...
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/57 (this is excessive, but just to make an example ...)
Sorry and crying ARE NOT A SOLUTION! You need to use your brain BEFORE doing things ... and probably just fake ...
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/111
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/64
https://t.iss.one/CarAccidentsFacts/104
Such bullshit sorry maybe are one of the reason why such dude are free after few months! (not the case of Breivik, but ...)
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/64
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/4
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/14
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/490
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/491
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/479
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/67
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/48
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/65
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/40
because psychologists maybe even BELIEVE such things!
See next post
Well, first we cannot say ANYTHING, because until now we haven't found the video about his reaction during the victim speeches ... this is huge important to know.
No matter, during the writing of the book he showed some emotions, after the attack nope (or at least we don't know, since you don't see him how he is reacting in prison too...). This not to defend him, but just to speak that with both sides in a neutral way ... because for us both sides are important ...
Second, making 😄 when victims are talking IS NOT OK AT ALL! even if you have a reason behind such killing. They are getting a double pain that will NEVER forget. They just remember the 😄
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/69
https://t.iss.one/CrimesTelegram/55
Already doing that before (maybe without victims) is not really ok
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/59
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/20
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/64
https://perma.cc/F3HQ-JPH6
but let we analyse WITH MULTIPLE PROSPECTIVE, because we hate people just looking thing from a victim prospective WHICH DOESN'T SHOW THE REALITY!
First, we prefer 10000x people saying i'm the killer, instead of bullshit just to make the court happy ...
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/57 (this is excessive, but just to make an example ...)
Sorry and crying ARE NOT A SOLUTION! You need to use your brain BEFORE doing things ... and probably just fake ...
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/111
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/64
https://t.iss.one/CarAccidentsFacts/104
Such bullshit sorry maybe are one of the reason why such dude are free after few months! (not the case of Breivik, but ...)
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/64
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/4
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/14
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/490
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/491
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/479
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/67
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/48
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/65
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/40
because psychologists maybe even BELIEVE such things!
See next post
Well, now our statement about "Brevik is not showing any type of remorse" (Part 2)
Part 1: https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/620
...
because psychologists maybe even BELIEVE such things! Like most people believe double face people or everything you hear / see / listen.
https://t.iss.one/StopDieWelle
https://t.iss.one/TgFreaksAnnouncements/174
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/570
without considering that maybe such people are not acting in neutral / objective way ..
NOT ONLY BECAUSE SOMEONE IS SAYING SOMETHING, MEANS HE REALLY THINK IN THAT WAY. Exactly like you don't know how your kids or whatever are thinking!
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/481
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/664
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/564
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/544
The same for other things, like job interview etc.
https://t.iss.one/ArtificialIntelligenceTelegram/120
so everything ... Saying something is NOT synonym of really wanting to say that. In a society, where people just want listen what they want to listen, that respect their ideas ...
https://t.iss.one/StopDieWelle/77
https://t.iss.one/StopDieWelle/78
https://t.iss.one/MissionEcocide/5
https://t.iss.one/AfDFakten/481
https://t.iss.one/AfDFakten/315
so everyone should be controlled, when a control is available
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/38
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/50
because again, YOU CANNOT TRUST ANYONE! and what they are saying ...
In conclusion. We don't agree at all with the massacre, with his behaviour after the attack
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/486
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/481
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/599
we are checking many things he said or wrote, we consider both views and in some point we agree with him, like the topic "oil" or "new generation"
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/116
for other things we are still checking or we have not enough infos ...
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/481
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/576
but for one thing we don't agree.
We don't agree with the fact that Breivik or other criminals should say "SORRY" if they don't believe that!
See next post
Part 1: https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/620
...
because psychologists maybe even BELIEVE such things! Like most people believe double face people or everything you hear / see / listen.
https://t.iss.one/StopDieWelle
https://t.iss.one/TgFreaksAnnouncements/174
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/570
without considering that maybe such people are not acting in neutral / objective way ..
NOT ONLY BECAUSE SOMEONE IS SAYING SOMETHING, MEANS HE REALLY THINK IN THAT WAY. Exactly like you don't know how your kids or whatever are thinking!
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/481
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/664
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/564
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/544
The same for other things, like job interview etc.
https://t.iss.one/ArtificialIntelligenceTelegram/120
so everything ... Saying something is NOT synonym of really wanting to say that. In a society, where people just want listen what they want to listen, that respect their ideas ...
https://t.iss.one/StopDieWelle/77
https://t.iss.one/StopDieWelle/78
https://t.iss.one/MissionEcocide/5
https://t.iss.one/AfDFakten/481
https://t.iss.one/AfDFakten/315
so everyone should be controlled, when a control is available
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/38
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/50
because again, YOU CANNOT TRUST ANYONE! and what they are saying ...
In conclusion. We don't agree at all with the massacre, with his behaviour after the attack
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/486
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/481
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/599
we are checking many things he said or wrote, we consider both views and in some point we agree with him, like the topic "oil" or "new generation"
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/116
for other things we are still checking or we have not enough infos ...
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/481
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/576
but for one thing we don't agree.
We don't agree with the fact that Breivik or other criminals should say "SORRY" if they don't believe that!
See next post
Breivik acting (Part 3)
Part 1: https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/620
Remember that Breivik invested many years and money to do that! So pretending for a sorry make little sense ... if the goal was exactly doing that ...
Yes, he could say "i'm sorry for the victims, but ..." but don't pretend that he is saying "i'm sorry", because this would be just a bullshit to make you happy ... not what he really think ...
No matter what, in some "indirect way" (we don't mean not verbal, but more about what he said / wrote) he is saying such sorry, even if such "indirect way" are not exactly what people wish to see. The want to see a real sorry.
During the court he even explained why he cried.
Just to make clear. You even need to check right sources. Some sources remove or short in a crazy way what he is saying ... just highlighting "the bad points". We find such way of acting inacceptable! no matter related to which person. Because if someone is saying A + B + C + D you cannot share A + Z! WTF Z, by ignoring B-D!
We agree with Putin too. Europe HAS NO RIGHT to change what he is saying!
This is against what he said! No matter about what he said during the court or what he wrote in book. Reason why we don't trust the informations written by journalist related to the death mother, a crime against her wish! Remember that they even needed to change part of what they write, after the lawyer complained ... https://perma.cc/J5X7-U2RA https://perma.cc/D5K2-3H4W
But again, we are still investigating this crime against the mother of Breivik
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/481
https://perma.cc/738T-A3WW https://perma.cc/6JK6-X5WN https://perma.cc/B4M3-2RK4
NO MATTER WHAT, YOU CANNOT TRUST A BOOK RELEASED AFTER THE DEATH OF A PERSON! which maybe contains just opinions of the journalist!
We haven't read that book until now ...
Remember that Breivik changed lawyer too ... https://perma.cc/WD3A-NP5W Plus the name is no more Anders Behring Breivik Telegram, but Fjotolf Hansen
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/529 https://perma.cc/74BU-24XF
Part 1: https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/620
Remember that Breivik invested many years and money to do that! So pretending for a sorry make little sense ... if the goal was exactly doing that ...
Yes, he could say "i'm sorry for the victims, but ..." but don't pretend that he is saying "i'm sorry", because this would be just a bullshit to make you happy ... not what he really think ...
No matter what, in some "indirect way" (we don't mean not verbal, but more about what he said / wrote) he is saying such sorry, even if such "indirect way" are not exactly what people wish to see. The want to see a real sorry.
During the court he even explained why he cried.
Just to make clear. You even need to check right sources. Some sources remove or short in a crazy way what he is saying ... just highlighting "the bad points". We find such way of acting inacceptable! no matter related to which person. Because if someone is saying A + B + C + D you cannot share A + Z! WTF Z, by ignoring B-D!
We agree with Putin too. Europe HAS NO RIGHT to change what he is saying!
This is against what he said! No matter about what he said during the court or what he wrote in book. Reason why we don't trust the informations written by journalist related to the death mother, a crime against her wish! Remember that they even needed to change part of what they write, after the lawyer complained ... https://perma.cc/J5X7-U2RA https://perma.cc/D5K2-3H4W
But again, we are still investigating this crime against the mother of Breivik
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/481
https://perma.cc/738T-A3WW https://perma.cc/6JK6-X5WN https://perma.cc/B4M3-2RK4
NO MATTER WHAT, YOU CANNOT TRUST A BOOK RELEASED AFTER THE DEATH OF A PERSON! which maybe contains just opinions of the journalist!
We haven't read that book until now ...
Remember that Breivik changed lawyer too ... https://perma.cc/WD3A-NP5W Plus the name is no more Anders Behring Breivik Telegram, but Fjotolf Hansen
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/529 https://perma.cc/74BU-24XF
First, we haven't checked if such story are true or fake, is not the point... but one thing we can immediately see, when we check the document shared by the International Federation for Human Rights for their fight against death sentences: THEY ARE USING SHIT EXAMPLES!
So exactly shitty death sentences
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences
we don't approve, where no sense crimes are sentenced to death or police are using force to be happy they found the criminal! This is NOT the way to do sentences in proper way! This is just shit!
So please, we need to stop use shit example as support for our no scientific ideas ...
We checked just one story and here the results:
On appeal, the Florida Supreme Court remanded the case for retrial, based on prosecutorial misconduct in presenting evidence that prejudiced the jury, including a detective’s testimony saying that he believed Martinez was guilty. During a re-investigation of the case, the informants all admitted that detectives had promised them rewards for their testimony https://perma.cc/LTB7-7LLV
Perfect, another example of shitty sentences, like said previously ...
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences/100
So exactly shitty death sentences
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences
we don't approve, where no sense crimes are sentenced to death or police are using force to be happy they found the criminal! This is NOT the way to do sentences in proper way! This is just shit!
So please, we need to stop use shit example as support for our no scientific ideas ...
We checked just one story and here the results:
On appeal, the Florida Supreme Court remanded the case for retrial, based on prosecutorial misconduct in presenting evidence that prejudiced the jury, including a detective’s testimony saying that he believed Martinez was guilty. During a re-investigation of the case, the informants all admitted that detectives had promised them rewards for their testimony https://perma.cc/LTB7-7LLV
Perfect, another example of shitty sentences, like said previously ...
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences/100
Let we check more about International Federation for Human Rights ...
"The first crime for which women are sentenced to death worldwide is murder. Many of these crimes involve murders of family members in a context of gender-based violence" ... Again shitty example!
Probably you should read
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences/93
"Drug-related offense is the second most common reason for women to be on death row, particularly in Asia and Middle East ..."
Another shitty example ...
"Women are disproportionately sentenced to death for adultery" ANOTHER SHIT EXAMPLE!
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences/107
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences/96
ARE YOU ABLE TO PROVIDE DECENT EXAMPLES? NOPE!
Other crimes for which women are sentenced to death include terrorism, prostitution, blasphemy, kidnapping, armed robbery, and witchcraft.
Perfect ...
Like said terrorism is a no go, if you are in a big organisation!
About kidnapping: well it depends from the situation ... and which other crimes have been done at the same time ...
Meanwhile just a reminder! If Breivik was a woman, she would deserve a death sentence too! Doesn't matter the sex! It's time to stop this bullshit "poor women" ...
https://t.iss.one/BreivikDeathSentence
Same for other serious crimes (where we have 100% the proofs, so again not 99% but 100%, otherwise a life sentence in prison!)
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW
Women are criminals like men, and deserve the exact same sentences, no matter they need to go in prison for life or other! Same for over 18 or under 18!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/48
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/1696
"The first crime for which women are sentenced to death worldwide is murder. Many of these crimes involve murders of family members in a context of gender-based violence" ... Again shitty example!
Probably you should read
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences/93
"Drug-related offense is the second most common reason for women to be on death row, particularly in Asia and Middle East ..."
Another shitty example ...
"Women are disproportionately sentenced to death for adultery" ANOTHER SHIT EXAMPLE!
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences/107
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences/96
ARE YOU ABLE TO PROVIDE DECENT EXAMPLES? NOPE!
Other crimes for which women are sentenced to death include terrorism, prostitution, blasphemy, kidnapping, armed robbery, and witchcraft.
Perfect ...
Like said terrorism is a no go, if you are in a big organisation!
About kidnapping: well it depends from the situation ... and which other crimes have been done at the same time ...
Meanwhile just a reminder! If Breivik was a woman, she would deserve a death sentence too! Doesn't matter the sex! It's time to stop this bullshit "poor women" ...
https://t.iss.one/BreivikDeathSentence
Same for other serious crimes (where we have 100% the proofs, so again not 99% but 100%, otherwise a life sentence in prison!)
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW
Women are criminals like men, and deserve the exact same sentences, no matter they need to go in prison for life or other! Same for over 18 or under 18!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/48
https://t.iss.one/RapeTelegram/1696
🇨🇦 Voies de fait graves
268 (1) Commet des voies de fait graves quiconque blesse, mutile ou défigure le plaignant ou met sa vie en danger.
(2) Quiconque commet des voies de fait graves est coupable d’un acte criminel et passible d’un emprisonnement maximal de quatorze ans https://perma.cc/MJ83-UHTH
= max 14 years of prison
(2) Quiconque commet un inceste est coupable d’un acte criminel et passible d’un emprisonnement maximal de quatorze ans, la peine minimale étant de cinq ans si l’autre personne est âgée de moins de seize ans https://perma.cc/CNT5-WNJX
14 years doing sex in family ...
Incitation à des contacts sexuels = 14 years
Contacts sexuels = 14 years
means already he would get 14 + 14 = 28 years of prison for aggression and rape in Canada
🇫🇷
Le viol est puni de quinze ans de réclusion criminelle https://perma.cc/SB5P-P78P = 15 years for rape per default —> 15 + 14 = 29 years!
Les agressions sexuelles autres que le viol sont punies de dix ans d'emprisonnement sont imposées à un mineur de quinze ans par violence, contrainte, menace ou surprise.
10 years of prison even without rape! —> 14 + 10 = 24 years!
Les violences ayant entraîné une mutilation ou une infirmité permanente sont punies de dix ans
Les violences ayant entraîné la mort sans intention de la donner sont punies de quinze ans de réclusion criminelle.
15 years killing someone without wanting to kill .. or even 20 years if serious
🇺🇸 (2) A person convicted of aggravated assault shall be imprisoned in the state prison for a term not to exceed 20 years https://perma.cc/LB8K-UUDL
A person convicted of sexual intercourse without consent shall be punished by life imprisonment or by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of not more than 20 years https://perma.cc/W5TJ-SZT8
Upgraded to a first-degree (serious bodily injury caused) = 99 years https://perma.cc/Y4F3-2VA4
20 + 20 - life = 40 - life years of prison
🇨🇭 10 + 10 = 20 years
only for the crime of rape + massacre ... without consider other things ... so already 20-40 years
268 (1) Commet des voies de fait graves quiconque blesse, mutile ou défigure le plaignant ou met sa vie en danger.
(2) Quiconque commet des voies de fait graves est coupable d’un acte criminel et passible d’un emprisonnement maximal de quatorze ans https://perma.cc/MJ83-UHTH
= max 14 years of prison
(2) Quiconque commet un inceste est coupable d’un acte criminel et passible d’un emprisonnement maximal de quatorze ans, la peine minimale étant de cinq ans si l’autre personne est âgée de moins de seize ans https://perma.cc/CNT5-WNJX
14 years doing sex in family ...
Incitation à des contacts sexuels = 14 years
Contacts sexuels = 14 years
means already he would get 14 + 14 = 28 years of prison for aggression and rape in Canada
🇫🇷
Le viol est puni de quinze ans de réclusion criminelle https://perma.cc/SB5P-P78P = 15 years for rape per default —> 15 + 14 = 29 years!
Les agressions sexuelles autres que le viol sont punies de dix ans d'emprisonnement sont imposées à un mineur de quinze ans par violence, contrainte, menace ou surprise.
10 years of prison even without rape! —> 14 + 10 = 24 years!
Les violences ayant entraîné une mutilation ou une infirmité permanente sont punies de dix ans
Les violences ayant entraîné la mort sans intention de la donner sont punies de quinze ans de réclusion criminelle.
15 years killing someone without wanting to kill .. or even 20 years if serious
🇺🇸 (2) A person convicted of aggravated assault shall be imprisoned in the state prison for a term not to exceed 20 years https://perma.cc/LB8K-UUDL
A person convicted of sexual intercourse without consent shall be punished by life imprisonment or by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of not more than 20 years https://perma.cc/W5TJ-SZT8
Upgraded to a first-degree (serious bodily injury caused) = 99 years https://perma.cc/Y4F3-2VA4
20 + 20 - life = 40 - life years of prison
🇨🇭 10 + 10 = 20 years
only for the crime of rape + massacre ... without consider other things ... so already 20-40 years
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Death sentence to rape?
Here we go, just one example such dude DESERVE TO DIE! for inhumanity!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW
If the police has 100% proof, there is no bullshit personal interests in the sentence, then such dude should sentenced 20 years in prison and after that get a few Pentobarbital-Sodium so he can sleep forever.
https://t.iss.one/PrisonFacts/349
Not only he tried to rape the girl, doing mostly a terroristic attack, but he even massacred the girl! The death sentence especially if he raped and massacred the girl, but no matter what, who try to rape is exactly criminal like who rape a girl!
Doesn't matter if you try to kill 20 people, but you are just able to injury few with 0 deaths, such person is exactly a terrorist like one who killed 20 people.
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/293
Next time this dude instead of doing 0, he maybe will do 15 ...
It's time to stop keep alive PEOPLE WHO DON'T DESERVE TO LIVE and trashed in 🚽 all their human rights by doing such crime!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
It's time to keep our population safe from trash people!
People doing small crimes deserve to live, innocent people deserve to live
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences
Serious criminals deserve just to die to be sure our security is safe.
Remember again, this was not done because he wanted some money or whatever (which already is a serious crime, if you massacre a person for that), the reason behind was raping the girl, one of the worst crime on this planet, even worse than homicide! (at the end with an homicide you killed the person ... while with a rape the person is still alive and need to live with traumas!)
This is not doing violence against violence (like Israel is doing by reacting a terror attack with a massacre, even if the goal is to kill Hamas ...).
This is doing the right to REMOVE FUTURE VIOLENCE done by such dude! Because we cannot just think "now" giving a shit to "future" and taking excuses like "recidivism is 20% (bullshit)"
Here we go, just one example such dude DESERVE TO DIE! for inhumanity!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW
If the police has 100% proof, there is no bullshit personal interests in the sentence, then such dude should sentenced 20 years in prison and after that get a few Pentobarbital-Sodium so he can sleep forever.
https://t.iss.one/PrisonFacts/349
Not only he tried to rape the girl, doing mostly a terroristic attack, but he even massacred the girl! The death sentence especially if he raped and massacred the girl, but no matter what, who try to rape is exactly criminal like who rape a girl!
Doesn't matter if you try to kill 20 people, but you are just able to injury few with 0 deaths, such person is exactly a terrorist like one who killed 20 people.
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/293
Next time this dude instead of doing 0, he maybe will do 15 ...
It's time to stop keep alive PEOPLE WHO DON'T DESERVE TO LIVE and trashed in 🚽 all their human rights by doing such crime!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
It's time to keep our population safe from trash people!
People doing small crimes deserve to live, innocent people deserve to live
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathSentences
Serious criminals deserve just to die to be sure our security is safe.
Remember again, this was not done because he wanted some money or whatever (which already is a serious crime, if you massacre a person for that), the reason behind was raping the girl, one of the worst crime on this planet, even worse than homicide! (at the end with an homicide you killed the person ... while with a rape the person is still alive and need to live with traumas!)
This is not doing violence against violence (like Israel is doing by reacting a terror attack with a massacre, even if the goal is to kill Hamas ...).
This is doing the right to REMOVE FUTURE VIOLENCE done by such dude! Because we cannot just think "now" giving a shit to "future" and taking excuses like "recidivism is 20% (bullshit)"