Breivik Syndrom Part 3

A mass murder with 100% proof should have NO RIGHT to request similar things
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/547
like NO RIGHT to request parole!
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/475
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/499
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/469
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/459

Ja. Han får sendt frankert post, men det er ikke gitt at det faktisk sendes, svarer Jordet.

Posten som sendes til og fra innsatte blir overvåket og sensurert av fengselsmyndighetene. Breivik klager over begrensningene han er underlagt, som bremser ned kontakten med omverdenen.

Yes. He can be sent franked mail, but it is not a given that it will actually be sent, Jordet replies.

The mail sent to and from inmates is monitored and censored by the prison authorities. Breivik complains about the restrictions he is subject to, which slow down his contact with the outside world.

Norway has the full right to check what he is sending and block that, at the end what he needed to say, he already said in the 1500 pages.

Norway should have no right to block things, if such things are related to explanation "why i did that?", "how is my relation with my family", since such infos are useful for investigations ... but obviously only specific people should get such infos, means not right wing supporters ...

«Dere har satt meg i helvete (...) og jeg vil ikke klare å overleve så lenge. Dere dreper meg,» skrev han til fengselsmyndighetene i november, og truet med sultestreik og ytterligere vold fra høyreekstreme.

"You have put me in hell (...) and I will not be able to survive this long. You are killing me," he wrote to prison authorities in November, threatening a hunger strike and further violence from the far right.

Well, this WAS YOUR DECISION! so don't complain now!

Plus even by getting death sentence, you would still live 20+ years in the same way ... Not just because you get death sentence, you will die after 3 seconds ...
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyBullshit/522

Breivik Syndrom Part 4

«Sultestreiken vil ikke ende før justisminister (Anders) Anundsen og leder av KDI (kriminalomsorgen) slutter å behandle meg som et dyr,» skriver Breivik, og legger til at han snart vil offentliggjøre startdatoen for protestaksjonen.

"The hunger strike will not end until the Minister of Justice (Anders) Anundsen and the head of the KDI (criminal correctional service) stop treating me like an animal," writes Breivik, adding that he will soon announce the start date of the protest action.

Blant de mer spesielle kravene er at Playstation 2 byttes ut med den nyere Playstation 3, med tilgang til det han mener er spill mer egnet for voksne, og som han kan plukke ut selv.

Among the more special requirements is that the Playstation 2 be replaced with the newer Playstation 3, with access to what he believes are games more suitable for adults, and which he can select himself https://perma.cc/UN9Q-D2MN

Well, even in Switzerland they get Playstation 2
https://t.iss.one/PrisonFacts/610 there is a reason why the get that! that is related to the requests he made previously!

Internet Connection Settings https://perma.cc/4E3Z-28QD

Breivik is well know for gaming. He wrote a lot about that in the diary

No matter what, prisoners should already happy to get a PS2! Some prisoners should make experience in the worst prison, where almost 0 rights are available ...

«Tortur-lignende forhold»
Videre skriver Breivik at han mener han har rett til et «bredere utvalg av aktiviteter» enn andre innsatte for å kompensere for å sitte i isolasjon.

«Torture-like conditions»
Furthermore, Breivik writes that he believes he has the right to a "wider selection of activities" than other inmates to compensate for sitting in isolation https://perma.cc/92HH-7X4N

Part 1 https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/546

Human Rights should be new defined, like we asked before! stopping the abuse of such human rights, just because currently the definition is pretty 💩 and missing for criminals ...
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/413

Well, he acted not properly, by expressing the opinion on social during the sentence, but for sure was the only one with 🧠 between all!

«Dødsstraff er det eneste rettferdige i denne saken», skrev han – og ga nok uttrykk for hva en god del nordmenn tenkte akkurat i disse forferdelige dagene i fjor sommer.

"The death penalty is the only fair thing in this case", he wrote - and probably expressed what a good number of Norwegians were thinking in those terrible days last summer.

Fagdommernes beslutning er tuftet på domstollovens paragraf 108: Når det foreligger særegne omstendigheter som kan svekke tilliten til meddommerens uhildethet, så må vedkommende vike sete.Ved starten av rettssaken i går ble satt med tre meddommere og en varameddommer, Anne Elisabeth Wisløff. Det var planen at hun skulle følge saken og tre inn i tilfelle sykdom. Det er vanlig i saker som er så langvarige som denne. Nå flytter reserven et hakk nærmere fagdommerne og overtar jobben til Indrebø.

The expert judges' decision is based on section 108 of the Courts Act: When there are special circumstances that can weaken confidence in the co-judge's impartiality, then that person must step down. At the start of the trial yesterday, three co-judges and one deputy co-judge, Anne Elisabeth Wisløff, were seated. The plan was for her to follow the case and step in in case of illness. It is common in cases as long-standing as this one. Now the reserve moves a notch closer to the professional judges and takes over Indrebø's job https://perma.cc/3JR8-6QNU

Indrebøs kommentar er en av totalt 45 kommentarer til artikkelen «Breivik erkjenner begge terrorangrepene».

Indrebø's comment is one of a total of 45 comments to the article "Breivik acknowledges both terrorist attacks" https://perma.cc/LK3Y-H2WA

First, the book contains so many informations, that there is not really a lot that need to get investigated ...
and what they did, they did it partially badly
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/490

Breivik Death Sentence Part 2

Part 1 https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/658

2: it was still not a "complex case". Yes, maybe someone helped him, but the evidence was there! This was an Island, not a city where people can hide them better ...
About why he did that, etc ... it's another point ... but has nothing to do with the sentence. If you kill x people, doesn't matter the reason!
But don't forget the "mother" example
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/617

Even this "mental not ok" is just bullshit!
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/412
because it doesn't matter the mental health or the age! Crime is crime!
Otherwise we do the same shit like in Bolivia ... https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/9

Except if there is a anatomical related disease behind that ...
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/618

Third: he did that after

Forsvarer Geir Lippestad bekrefter at Anders Behring Breivik (32) har erkjent at han står bak angrepet på Regjeringskvartalet og AUF-leiren på Utøya.

Defender Geir Lippestad confirms that Anders Behring Breivik (32) has acknowledged that he is behind the attack on the Government Quarters and the AUF camp on Utøya.

Han har erkjent de faktiske forholdene, bekreftet Lippestad til pressen da han kom ut fra politihuset like etter klokken 23 lørdag kveld.

He has acknowledged the actual circumstances, Lippestad confirmed to the press when he came out of the police station shortly after 11pm on Saturday evening.

Også mye av informasjonen i dokumentet tyder på at Breivik er forfatteren.

Much of the information in the document also suggests that Breivik is the author https://perma.cc/BD28-UWH2

Well, it was an article, so again not a proper way to act, BUT ...

4: Breivik 2.0
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/613

Philip Manshaus (22) er dømt til forvaring i 21 år med en minstetid på 14 år etter å ha drept stesøsteren Johanne Ihle-Hansen, før han dro til Al-Noor-moskeen 10. august 2019. Han dømmes også til å betale erstatning til de pårørende.

Breivik Death Sentence Part 3

Philip Manshaus (22) has been sentenced to detention for 21 years with a minimum term of 14 years after killing his stepsister Johanne Ihle-Hansen, before he went to the Al-Noor mosque on 10 August 2019. He is also sentenced to pay compensation to the next of kin https://perma.cc/HWX8-VS45

So this dude got the SAME sentence like Breivik! NO SENSE! even if he killed much less people. Don't forget suicide in Breivik case ... https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/586

5: how Breivik got the sentence is just ridiculous
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/646
to
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/651
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/341
to
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/346
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/458

and we don't need to forget how he acted
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/384
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/255
etc.

6: related to 4-5

«I en slik vurdering må det tillegges vekt at særlig kvalifiserte tilfeller av finansiering av terrorhandling også vil kunne bli ansett som medvirkning til selve handlingen med en høyere strafferamme på 21 år.»

"In such an assessment, weight must be added to the fact that particularly qualified cases of financing a terrorist act will also be considered complicity in the act itself with a higher penalty of 21 years."

Dreier det seg ikke bare om rene finansieringshandlinger, men om medvirkning til terrorisme, kommer § 147 a med en strafferamme på inntil 21 års fengsel til anvendelse. Paragraf 147 b vil ikke kunne anvendes i konkurrens med § 147 a.

If it is not just about purely financing actions, but about complicity in terrorism, Section 147 a with a penalty of up to 21 years' imprisonment is applied. Paragraph 147 b will not be able to be used in competition with § 147 a. https://perma.cc/2X5W-27PS

Breivik Death Sentence Part 4

Etter straffeloven 2005 § 138 straffes terrorbombing med fengsel inntil 21 år, mens § 139 omhandler kapring av luftfartøy og skip. Gisseltaking i terrorøyemed straffes etter § 143 med fengsel inntil 12 år, mens straff for angrep på en internasjonalt beskyttet person, bl.a. statsoverholde, regjeringssjef og utenriksminister etter § 144, er 21 år.

According to the Penal Code 2005 § 138, terrorist bombing is punished with imprisonment of up to 21 years, while § 139 deals with the hijacking of aircraft and ships. Taking hostages for the purpose of terrorism is punishable under § 143 with imprisonment of up to 12 years, while the punishment for an attack on an internationally protected person, i.a. state official, head of government and foreign minister according to Section 144, is 21 years old https://perma.cc/R7TM-YJUG

Straffen er fengsel inntil 21 år. Grov terrorhandling straffes med fengsel inntil 30 år.

The penalty is imprisonment for up to 21 years. Serious acts of terrorism are punishable by imprisonment for up to 30 years.
https://t.iss.one/DefenceTelegram/470

Grov terrorhandling straffes med fengsel inntil 30 år.​3 Ved avgjørelsen av om terrorhandlingen er grov, skal det særlig legges vekt på om den

a. har medført tap av flere menneskeliv eller svært omfattende ødeleggelse av eiendom eller miljø, eller særlig nærliggende fare for det,​5
b. er utført med særlig skadelige midler,
c. er begått av en person som i kraft av sin stilling nyter en særlig tillit som kan utnyttes til å gjennomføre en terrorhandling.

A serious act of terrorism is punishable by imprisonment for up to 30 years.​3 When deciding whether the act of terrorism is serious, particular emphasis must be placed on whether it

a. has resulted in the loss of several human lives or very extensive destruction of property or the environment, or a particularly imminent danger of this,5
b. is carried out with particularly harmful means,

Breivik Death Sentence Part 5

Part 1 https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/658

A serious act of terrorism is punishable by imprisonment for up to 30 years:

c. is committed by a person who, by virtue of his position, enjoys a special trust which can be used to carry out a terrorist act https://perma.cc/UV3H-3AE3

So in conclusion: yes, is an huge complex story, BUT not for the type of the crime he did, more because it's complex to understand all reasons behind that ...

The crime he did was pretty easy to sentence, but since our laws make things complicate, all that got complicate.

When in reality is pretty easy, once you have enough proof and the sum of crimes done are enough to put a dude in prison for life / death ...

There are stories much more complex ... For sure 11 September was more complex, even because it was not just one dude.

Last point, between all terrorists, Breivik made the record of number of pages written ...

in few words:

Kriminalomsorgen i Norge er ikke rigget for en innsatt av Anders Behring Breiviks kaliber.

The correctional system in Norway is not equipped for an inmate of Anders Behring Breivik's caliber.

and this is the case for 2023 too!

Et stort flertall av oss er trolig av den oppfatning at Breivik hadde fortjent en strengere straff enn den han fikk. Vi har ikke dødsstraff i Norge. Vi har heller ikke livsvarig fengsel uten mulighet for løslatelse. I stedet har vi forvaring.

A large majority of us are probably of the opinion that Breivik deserved a harsher punishment than the one he received. We do not have the death penalty in Norway. Nor do we have life imprisonment without the possibility of release. Instead, we have custody https://perma.cc/G7QG-U3ZZ

Breiviks advokat har etter min mening et likevel et poeng når han peker på at behandlingen av Breivik skiller seg markant fra behandlingen av alle andre innsatte på forvaring, i og med at han har vært og er underlagt et regime som har ligget fast hele tiden.

Breivik Death Sentence Part 6

Part 1 https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/658

Han tilbringer omtrent all sin tid i isolasjon på sitt område i fengselet og har minimal kontakt med andre mennesker enn dem som er ansatt for å ivareta ham. Da har han også få impulser til å forandre seg.

In my opinion (journalist), Breivik's lawyer still has a point when he points out that the treatment of Breivik differs markedly from the treatment of all other inmates in custody, in that he has been and is subject to a regime that has been in place all along. He spends almost all of his time in isolation in his area of the prison and has minimal contact with people other than those employed to look after him. Then he also has few impulses to change.

Det er lett å tenke at det har han godt av. Det tenker jeg også. Breivik fortjener ikke vår medfølelse. Men retten kan ikke tenke sånn. Hevn er ikke en følelse som anerkjennes av norsk lov.

It is easy to think that he benefits from that. I think so too. Breivik does not deserve our sympathy. But the court cannot think like that. Revenge is not an emotion recognized by Norwegian law.

Han risikerer å bli angrepet av andre innsatte dersom han ikke isoleres. Det er også en fare for at han kan påvirke andre innsatte til å bli politisk ekstreme. Det er også derfor det er nødvendig å begrense hvem han kan kommunisere med utenfor murene.

He risks being attacked by other inmates if he is not isolated. There is also a danger that he may influence other inmates to become politically extreme. This is also why it is necessary to limit who he can communicate with outside the walls https://perma.cc/G7QG-U3ZZ

without talking about the parole story ....
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/459
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/469
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/475
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/546
to
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/549

💡 Breivik request (2. person)
https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/617

So we need to change, not just in Norway, but everywhere! because currently our laws are just a joke!

Hitler gesture is an hate against 🇮🇱? Part 2

Part 1 https://t.iss.one/TerrorismTelegram/666

I forkant av Breiviks ankomst i rettssalen, sa Verøy at dersom Breivik har lært, så ville han ikke gjøre nazihilsen. Dette fordi det vil tale direkte imot hans ønske om å prøveløslates.

Ahead of Breivik's arrival in the courtroom, Verøy said that if Breivik had learned, he would not do the Nazi salute. This is because it will speak directly against his wish to be paroled https://perma.cc/9WTQ-Y6H3

Breivik: "I believe Europe should strive for: A cultural conservative approach where monoculturalism, moral, the nuclear family, a free market, support for Israel and our Christian cousins of the east, law and order and Christendom itself must be central aspects (unlike now) ..."

I support the continued consolidation of non-Muslim Europe and an unconditional support to all Christian countries and societies (Israel included), in addition to continuing our good relationships with all Hindu and Buddhist countries.

Forut for terrorhandlingene 22. juli 2011 utviste Breivik en eksepsjonell evne til å handle og opptre fordekt. Selv ikke hans egen mor merket noen endring i ham, selv bare dager før han begikk «den verste volds- og terrorhandling i norsk kriminalhistorie», poengterte regjeringsadvokaten.

Prior to the terrorist acts on 22 July 2011, Breivik displayed an exceptional ability to act and act undercover. Not even his own mother noticed any change in him, even just days before he committed "the worst act of violence and terrorism in Norwegian criminal history", pointed out the government attorney https://perma.cc/4V7F-7P8D

It is mainly letters with far-right content to fellow opinion-leaders Anders Behring Breivik did not know before 22 July 2011 that are stopped by the prison

Dommer Øystein Hermansen ba Breivik om å ikke gjenta nazihilsenen.

Judge Øystein Hermansen asked Breivik not to repeat the Nazi salute.

Means the answer is BULLSHIT! showed with Breivik story