Whether it be ISIS or any other American/israeli proxy terrorist group, they all fight under the umbrella of Zionism.

— Three points:

1. ISIS claims responsibility for literally anything these days, in a desperate attempt to stay relevant. So them saying 'it was us' doesn't necessarily mean it was them.

2. Even if it was ISIS, it could not have been carried out without American and Israeli backing / funding. They covered for ISIS from its very inception.

3. ISIS controls basically no more territory in the Middle East. If Iran will retaliate, which it will, where will they strike? They can't just fire missiles at ISIS strongholds in Syria like they used to. This time, the head of the snake must be dismantled.

@Middle_East_Spectator

🇮🇶 Iraqis have come in masses to mourn the martyr Mushtaq Taleb Al-Saeedi (aka Abu Taqwa), killed this morning in an airstrike by US terrorist forces.

They chant: "There is no god but God, America is the enemy of God... To the Qibla of the free, to the master of martyrs, and his brother Abu al-Fadl al-Abbas, peace be upon them."

@FotrosResistance

— 🇮🇶 The Islamic Resistance in Iraq posted this on their channel moments ago

@Middle_East_Spectator

— 🇷🇸/🇮🇷 Serbian President in a phone call with the Iranian President: 'We hope that those involved in the Kerman bombings will be held accountable, and Serbia stands with Iran in the war against terrorism'

@Middle_East_Spectator

I'm not gonna lie, the resistance really is not doing itself a favor by constantly threatening.

If you want to do something, do it, don't threat and make hype edits for 24/7 and then give a silent fart.

🇮🇶🇸🇾⚡🇺🇸 In the past hour, the Islamic resistance of Iraq attacked three American bases in Syria:

-Al-Omar oil field base
-Al-Rukban base
-Al-Tanf base

And apparently more is coming...

🚩 @ResistanceTrench

— 🇮🇷/🏴 READ: ISIS claimed responsibility for the Kerman bombings, but many things about the attack do not check out

There are some very suspicious signs that not ISIS, but rather a different entity wrote today's statement. They are the following:

1. ISIS used the word 'Iran' in its official statement, which is highly unusual. ISIS always uses Islamic rhetoric, as they do not believe in the concept of nation states. In past attacks on Iran, they called it 'Fars Province' or 'Khorasan Province' as part of the Islamic Caliphate, but never 'Iran'.

2. ISIS published the photos of the two alleged suicide bombers with their faces blurred. This is highly unusual; previous suicide bombers never had their faces blurred. Additionally, there is no practical reason for the images to be blurred, which is usually done to avoid identification leading to their arrest. This is not an active risk, because the suicide bombers are already dead and their bodies in pieces.

3. ISIS took responsibility approximately 30 hours after the bombings. This is unusual, as the terrorist group usually issues a statement on the same day of the attack, most of the times even immediately after.

@Middle_East_Spectator

— 🇾🇪 NEW: An operation by Yemen's Ansarullah in the Red Sea, details to follow

@Middle_East_Spectator

— 🇾🇪 An Ansarullah official posted a cryptic message on Twitter:

ب ا ر ج ة ح ر ب ي ة

Which if you connect the letters, says 'بارجة حربية', meaning 'warship' in Arabic.

This could possibly mean that Ansarullah targeted an American warship in the Red Sea.

@Middle_East_Spectator

— 🇸🇾/🇮🇷/🇯🇴 NEW: The Royal Jordanian Air Force has bombed Iranian-linked 'hideouts and warehouses' in Syria – Reuters

@Middle_East_Spectator