U.S. Supreme Court Delivers Redistricting Win for Republicans — Decision Could Nuke ‘Cheat Code’ the Left Uses to Retain Power in Urban Areas
The U.S. Supreme Court just sidelined Wisconsin’s highest court and delivered a significant win for Wisconsin Republicans, who were trying to throw out a state legislative map that included a new majority-Black district.
SCOTUS issued a 7-2 decision reversing the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s selection of Governor Tony Evers’s legislative maps. The per curiam decision said, “We agree that the court committed legal error in its application of decisions of this Court regarding the relationship between the constitutional guarantee of equal protection and the VRA.”
The Wisconsin voters represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) joined the Wisconsin Legislature in an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on March 7. The appeal argued the maps submitted by Governor Tony Evers and selected by a majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court are a racial gerrymander that violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantees. The U.S. Constitution makes clear that any government action based on race is subject to strict scrutiny.
Red State explains the significance of the ruling:
“This decision is just the latest step by the Supreme Court to limit the ability of the Voting Rights Act to serve as a partisan tool for Democrats to racially gerrymander for their own political gain. For decades, Democrat officeholders have used the VRA test of proportionality to ensure they retain power in predominately urban areas while ignoring all other factors. The conservatives on the Supreme Court are not keen to let that continue and have been chipping away at such practices for several years now.
In the end, Democrats aren’t freaking out because of the possibility of losing a single, state-level district in Wisconsin. No one, including Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, actually cares about that. Rather, they are freaking out because this decision is much farther reaching and could completely nuke the left’s ‘cheat code’ regarding redistricting in the future.”
Read more🗞 WILL, Talking Points, Red State
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The U.S. Supreme Court just sidelined Wisconsin’s highest court and delivered a significant win for Wisconsin Republicans, who were trying to throw out a state legislative map that included a new majority-Black district.
SCOTUS issued a 7-2 decision reversing the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s selection of Governor Tony Evers’s legislative maps. The per curiam decision said, “We agree that the court committed legal error in its application of decisions of this Court regarding the relationship between the constitutional guarantee of equal protection and the VRA.”
The Wisconsin voters represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) joined the Wisconsin Legislature in an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on March 7. The appeal argued the maps submitted by Governor Tony Evers and selected by a majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court are a racial gerrymander that violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantees. The U.S. Constitution makes clear that any government action based on race is subject to strict scrutiny.
Red State explains the significance of the ruling:
“This decision is just the latest step by the Supreme Court to limit the ability of the Voting Rights Act to serve as a partisan tool for Democrats to racially gerrymander for their own political gain. For decades, Democrat officeholders have used the VRA test of proportionality to ensure they retain power in predominately urban areas while ignoring all other factors. The conservatives on the Supreme Court are not keen to let that continue and have been chipping away at such practices for several years now.
In the end, Democrats aren’t freaking out because of the possibility of losing a single, state-level district in Wisconsin. No one, including Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, actually cares about that. Rather, they are freaking out because this decision is much farther reaching and could completely nuke the left’s ‘cheat code’ regarding redistricting in the future.”
Read more🗞 WILL, Talking Points, Red State
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Red State
Supreme Court Decision on Redistricting Leaves Democrats Reeling
Wailing and gnashing of teeth have already commenced.
👍263👏47🔥36❤11😁8🤔3🤯2🥰1😢1
Reminder: True the Vote Testifying Before Wisconsin Assembly Committee Tomorrow at 10AM CT
On March 24, 2022 at 10AM, the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections will hold an informational hearing on the following:
2020 Election Investigation – Pursuant to AR -15
Speakers – True the Vote: Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips
Attorney James Bopp
Livestreams 📺
👉 Wis Eye
👉 CannCon Rumble
Background🔎 2,000 Mules
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
On March 24, 2022 at 10AM, the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections will hold an informational hearing on the following:
2020 Election Investigation – Pursuant to AR -15
Speakers – True the Vote: Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips
Attorney James Bopp
Livestreams 📺
👉 Wis Eye
👉 CannCon Rumble
Background🔎 2,000 Mules
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍148👏21❤7🔥6🤔1
Pfizer’s Own Informed Consent Documents Undermine FDA and CDC’s Cries of “Safe and Effective” | ICAN
Pfizer’s own informed consent documents, recently obtained by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), show it discloses potential concerns, including myocarditis, original antigenic sin, and birth defects, while the FDA & CDC whitewash these concerns to declare these products are safe and effective.
ICAN has now obtained the materials used by the Cincinnati’s Children’s Hospital in conducting its studies of the Pfizer booster vaccine, including in children. The documents prepared in consultation with Pfizer tell us a lot about how Pfizer understands the risks of its products.
Pfizer is clearly worried about the risks of myocarditis (heart inflammation) in kids. Pfizer’s own informed consent documents reveal that the risk of myocarditis may be as high as 1 in 1,000 (see page 4).
But the FDA and CDC blithely ignored this risk in approving the Pfizer mRNA shot in kids. Only after rushing this product through the approval process did the CDC begrudgingly admit that “Myocarditis and pericarditis have rarely been reported, especially in adolescents and young adult males within several days after COVID-19 vaccination.”
Pfizer is also aware of the possibility of original antigenic sin and pathogenic priming (unwanted immune responses that leave one worse off in response to a virus than if one had done nothing). Pfizer warns parents of clinical trial participants that “it cannot yet be ruled out that the study vaccine could make a later COVID-19 illness more severe” (emphasis added). The FDA and CDC go to great lengths to hide that information while proclaiming “safe and effective” over and over again like a mantra.
Pfizer appears very worried about the potential of the teratogenesis (harm to a developing fetus) and even possibly mutagenesis (harm to DNA). So even though this is a trial in children, Pfizer disclosed to the parents of these children that “the effects of the COVID-19 vaccine on sperm, a pregnancy, a fetus, or a nursing child are not known.”
But then Pfizer goes even further to state that:
• If your daughter is pregnant, planning to become pregnant or is breast feeding a baby, she cannot be in the study as there may be risks to the unborn baby or nursing baby.Nobody knows what these risks are right now.”
• “If your daughter becomes pregnant, she will have to leave the study.”
• “If your child is a boy, and he thinks he may have gotten a girl pregnant, he or you must tell your child’s study doctor immediately. The study doctor may ask for information about the pregnancy and the birth of the baby. The study doctor may share this information with others who are working on this study.”
• “If your son is taking part in this study, he is not allowed to donate sperm for at least 28 days after his last vaccination.”
Let’s just pause to acknowledge just how deeply unsettling this language is. But it just goes to show that Pfizer wanted to make sure that they had no data at all on pregnancy outcomes.
Given that, the CDC’s recommendation to pregnant women to get vaccinated is scientifically unsound to say the least.
The FDA and CDC have a job to do – evaluate the evidence without bias to keep the public safe. Instead, the FDA and CDC have turned themselves into a marketing department on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry.
Read more🗞 ICAN Decide
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Pfizer’s own informed consent documents, recently obtained by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), show it discloses potential concerns, including myocarditis, original antigenic sin, and birth defects, while the FDA & CDC whitewash these concerns to declare these products are safe and effective.
ICAN has now obtained the materials used by the Cincinnati’s Children’s Hospital in conducting its studies of the Pfizer booster vaccine, including in children. The documents prepared in consultation with Pfizer tell us a lot about how Pfizer understands the risks of its products.
Pfizer is clearly worried about the risks of myocarditis (heart inflammation) in kids. Pfizer’s own informed consent documents reveal that the risk of myocarditis may be as high as 1 in 1,000 (see page 4).
But the FDA and CDC blithely ignored this risk in approving the Pfizer mRNA shot in kids. Only after rushing this product through the approval process did the CDC begrudgingly admit that “Myocarditis and pericarditis have rarely been reported, especially in adolescents and young adult males within several days after COVID-19 vaccination.”
Pfizer is also aware of the possibility of original antigenic sin and pathogenic priming (unwanted immune responses that leave one worse off in response to a virus than if one had done nothing). Pfizer warns parents of clinical trial participants that “it cannot yet be ruled out that the study vaccine could make a later COVID-19 illness more severe” (emphasis added). The FDA and CDC go to great lengths to hide that information while proclaiming “safe and effective” over and over again like a mantra.
Pfizer appears very worried about the potential of the teratogenesis (harm to a developing fetus) and even possibly mutagenesis (harm to DNA). So even though this is a trial in children, Pfizer disclosed to the parents of these children that “the effects of the COVID-19 vaccine on sperm, a pregnancy, a fetus, or a nursing child are not known.”
But then Pfizer goes even further to state that:
• If your daughter is pregnant, planning to become pregnant or is breast feeding a baby, she cannot be in the study as there may be risks to the unborn baby or nursing baby.Nobody knows what these risks are right now.”
• “If your daughter becomes pregnant, she will have to leave the study.”
• “If your child is a boy, and he thinks he may have gotten a girl pregnant, he or you must tell your child’s study doctor immediately. The study doctor may ask for information about the pregnancy and the birth of the baby. The study doctor may share this information with others who are working on this study.”
• “If your son is taking part in this study, he is not allowed to donate sperm for at least 28 days after his last vaccination.”
Let’s just pause to acknowledge just how deeply unsettling this language is. But it just goes to show that Pfizer wanted to make sure that they had no data at all on pregnancy outcomes.
Given that, the CDC’s recommendation to pregnant women to get vaccinated is scientifically unsound to say the least.
The FDA and CDC have a job to do – evaluate the evidence without bias to keep the public safe. Instead, the FDA and CDC have turned themselves into a marketing department on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry.
Read more🗞 ICAN Decide
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network
Pfizer’s Own Informed Consent Documents Undermine FDA and CDC’s Cries of “Safe and Effective” - ICAN - Informed Consent Action…
Pfizer’s own informed consent documents, recently obtained by ICAN, show it discloses potential concerns, including myocarditis, original antigenic sin, and birth defects, while the FDA & CDC whitewash these concerns to declare these products are safe and…
🤬183👍45🔥8🤔7❤2😁2🥰1
What a Surprise: Maricopa County Special Master Router Review Finds… Nothing
The “Special Master” and his hand-picked, 3-person team have released the results of their review of Maricopa County’s routers and Splunk logs. The report found “no routers or managed switches or Splunk logs in the Ballot Tabulation Center (BTC),” and “no evidence of data deletion, data purging, data overwriting, or other destruction of evidence or obstruction of the audit.”
Per the dodgy agreement orchestrated by Arizona Senate President Karen Fann last September, the Arizona audit technical team submitted questions to the Special Master — they were not allowed to be present during the investigation, nor were they allowed to view any of the data directly.
Many of the questions could not be answered due to the length of time that had elapsed. A version of the following answer was given to nearly half of the 5 dozen questions submitted to the Special Master: “Specific data not available for the timeframe scoped. This is a dynamic command and results change over time pending regular maintenance.”
The Special Master’s “expert team” did note that unauthorized access to registration information had occurred before the 2020 election:
“An unauthorized member of the public used a PowerShell script with sequential low egress parameters for harvesting information from the voter registration database. The individual was taking 'screenshots' of voter registration information. County staff remediated to restrict website access and referred case to State Attorney General. Arrest was made December 5th, 2020. Case No. 20-3262MB.”
Read 📑 Special Master Report
Related🔎 Karen Fann BOS Contract
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The “Special Master” and his hand-picked, 3-person team have released the results of their review of Maricopa County’s routers and Splunk logs. The report found “no routers or managed switches or Splunk logs in the Ballot Tabulation Center (BTC),” and “no evidence of data deletion, data purging, data overwriting, or other destruction of evidence or obstruction of the audit.”
Per the dodgy agreement orchestrated by Arizona Senate President Karen Fann last September, the Arizona audit technical team submitted questions to the Special Master — they were not allowed to be present during the investigation, nor were they allowed to view any of the data directly.
Many of the questions could not be answered due to the length of time that had elapsed. A version of the following answer was given to nearly half of the 5 dozen questions submitted to the Special Master: “Specific data not available for the timeframe scoped. This is a dynamic command and results change over time pending regular maintenance.”
The Special Master’s “expert team” did note that unauthorized access to registration information had occurred before the 2020 election:
“An unauthorized member of the public used a PowerShell script with sequential low egress parameters for harvesting information from the voter registration database. The individual was taking 'screenshots' of voter registration information. County staff remediated to restrict website access and referred case to State Attorney General. Arrest was made December 5th, 2020. Case No. 20-3262MB.”
Read 📑 Special Master Report
Related🔎 Karen Fann BOS Contract
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
🤬175👍36😱8🤔1
True the Vote WI Assembly Hearing: An Estimated 138K Ballots Were Trafficked in Wisconsin’s 2020 Election
Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips of True the Vote presented testimony about their investigation into ballot trafficking in Wisconsin’s 2020 election.
“It was not the most secure election ever. It was quite possibly one of the least,” Engelbrecht began.
“We’ve watched the mass mail-out of paper ballots to highly inaccurate voter records,” she continued. “The harried installation of by-mail absentee ballot drop boxes, privately funded by billionaire tech magnates. And the hundreds of legislative changes, lawsuits, consent decrees, all that fundamentally altered election processes. And all of this came together in 2020 under the fog of COVID. It’s hard not to look at the confluence of events and come away with any conclusion other than that it was planned.”
True the Vote “formed a working hypothesis, in part, from informant testimonies across the country,” Engelbrecht explained. “It went something like this: If non-profit groups, being funded by CTCL and others, were going to exploit weaknesses in our election process, then the exploitation would likely involve mail ballots (which are notoriously insecure) and the newly introduced and highly unregulated absentee ballot drop boxes.”
It turns out that WEC did not follow through with its stated commitment to CISA’s guidelines for drop box security. Open records requests confirmed there was no drop box surveillance video available for review in any municipality in Wisconsin except Brown Deer. So True the Vote shifted to commercially available cell phone data.
The group used cutting edge “geofence” technology able to track cell phones to within “a few inches.” To put the sophistication of the technology into perspective, Phillips quoted Georgetown law professor Paul Ohm, who said, “DNA is the only thing harder to anonymize than precise geolocation data.”
True the Vote purchased 10 trillion cell signals in Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Wisconsin, Detroit, Michigan, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
In Wisconsin, the group looked at 1.1 trillion signals (representing 421K unique devices, 20TB of data) between 10/1 and 11/8, a period which encompassed several weeks before early voting began. This allowed True the Vote to build a pre-election “pattern of life” to help identify the ballot trafficking mules.
The team then narrowed down the surveillance to individuals that visited at least 5 NGO offices and 26 drop boxes during the early voting period (a pattern that was contrary to their previous daily activity); 138 people in Milwaukee, Racine, and Green Bay fit that profile. These individuals made 3,568 visits to drop boxes during the 2020 election. Philips noted that 14 of these alleged traffickers also participated in one or more of the violent riots in Wisconsin in 2020.
There are 5 key components to the ballot trafficking hypothesis, Philips summarized: “inaccurate voter rolls, mass mail ballots, NGOs, privately funded drop boxes, and money.”
By “following the money,” Phillips said, True the Vote has uncovered a “nationwide grift around voting” in which not-for-profits orchestrated a paid ballot collection, ballot preparation, and harvested ballot delivery operation.
The group estimates that at least 7% of all mail-in ballots (138K in Wisconsin, 4.8 million nationwide) were trafficked during the 2020 election. “This was an organized crime that was perpetrated on Americans,” Phillips emphasized.
During the Q&A session, Phillips mentioned that while True the Vote has the names of the 5 NGOs, they are unable to release that information due to an active legal investigation.
Engelbrecht concluded by reiterating that ballot drop boxes, mass mail-in ballots, and “dirty voter rolls are the gateway to fraud” in our elections. States must commit to eliminating these sources of fraud, and the penalties for cheating must be severe, she said.
Watch 📺 True the Vote Hearing
Read 📑 True the Vote WI Report
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips of True the Vote presented testimony about their investigation into ballot trafficking in Wisconsin’s 2020 election.
“It was not the most secure election ever. It was quite possibly one of the least,” Engelbrecht began.
“We’ve watched the mass mail-out of paper ballots to highly inaccurate voter records,” she continued. “The harried installation of by-mail absentee ballot drop boxes, privately funded by billionaire tech magnates. And the hundreds of legislative changes, lawsuits, consent decrees, all that fundamentally altered election processes. And all of this came together in 2020 under the fog of COVID. It’s hard not to look at the confluence of events and come away with any conclusion other than that it was planned.”
True the Vote “formed a working hypothesis, in part, from informant testimonies across the country,” Engelbrecht explained. “It went something like this: If non-profit groups, being funded by CTCL and others, were going to exploit weaknesses in our election process, then the exploitation would likely involve mail ballots (which are notoriously insecure) and the newly introduced and highly unregulated absentee ballot drop boxes.”
It turns out that WEC did not follow through with its stated commitment to CISA’s guidelines for drop box security. Open records requests confirmed there was no drop box surveillance video available for review in any municipality in Wisconsin except Brown Deer. So True the Vote shifted to commercially available cell phone data.
The group used cutting edge “geofence” technology able to track cell phones to within “a few inches.” To put the sophistication of the technology into perspective, Phillips quoted Georgetown law professor Paul Ohm, who said, “DNA is the only thing harder to anonymize than precise geolocation data.”
True the Vote purchased 10 trillion cell signals in Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Wisconsin, Detroit, Michigan, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
In Wisconsin, the group looked at 1.1 trillion signals (representing 421K unique devices, 20TB of data) between 10/1 and 11/8, a period which encompassed several weeks before early voting began. This allowed True the Vote to build a pre-election “pattern of life” to help identify the ballot trafficking mules.
The team then narrowed down the surveillance to individuals that visited at least 5 NGO offices and 26 drop boxes during the early voting period (a pattern that was contrary to their previous daily activity); 138 people in Milwaukee, Racine, and Green Bay fit that profile. These individuals made 3,568 visits to drop boxes during the 2020 election. Philips noted that 14 of these alleged traffickers also participated in one or more of the violent riots in Wisconsin in 2020.
There are 5 key components to the ballot trafficking hypothesis, Philips summarized: “inaccurate voter rolls, mass mail ballots, NGOs, privately funded drop boxes, and money.”
By “following the money,” Phillips said, True the Vote has uncovered a “nationwide grift around voting” in which not-for-profits orchestrated a paid ballot collection, ballot preparation, and harvested ballot delivery operation.
The group estimates that at least 7% of all mail-in ballots (138K in Wisconsin, 4.8 million nationwide) were trafficked during the 2020 election. “This was an organized crime that was perpetrated on Americans,” Phillips emphasized.
During the Q&A session, Phillips mentioned that while True the Vote has the names of the 5 NGOs, they are unable to release that information due to an active legal investigation.
Engelbrecht concluded by reiterating that ballot drop boxes, mass mail-in ballots, and “dirty voter rolls are the gateway to fraud” in our elections. States must commit to eliminating these sources of fraud, and the penalties for cheating must be severe, she said.
Watch 📺 True the Vote Hearing
Read 📑 True the Vote WI Report
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Rumble
Campaigns and Elections Hearing WI. True The Vote 3-24-2022
Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections On March 24, 2022, the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections held an informational hearing on the following: 2020 Election Investigation: 2020 Ele
🔥140👍64👏5🤬3❤2🥰2🤔2
Trump Sues Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Every Person Involved with the Russia Hoax: ‘Watergate Pales in Comparison’ | The Blaze
Former President Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and others for purportedly conspiring to overthrow his presidency and cripple his presidential campaign.
What are the details?
The massive 108-page complaint accuses the former secretary of state and Democratic allies — including Clinton campaign aides, former FBI Director James Comey, the Democratic National Convention, and others — of engaging in an "unthinkable plot" to falsely accuse him of colluding with Russia during the 2016 presidential cycle and subsequent election.
A portion of the petition states, "In the run-up to the 2016 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts orchestrated an unthinkable plot – one that shocks the conscience and is an affront to this nation’s democracy. Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty.”
Others named in the suit include former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former Clinton campaign head John Podesta, and former FBI officials Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page.
The Trump suit alleges that Clinton and her Democratic cohorts crafted a falsified link between the former president's campaign and Russia, which ultimately triggered an "unfounded federal investigation" as well as a "media frenzy."
"Under the guise of 'opposition research,' 'data analytics,' and other political stratagems, the Defendants nefariously sought to sway the public's trust," another portion of the lawsuit says. "They worked together with a single, self-serving purpose: to vilify Donald J. Trump."
The suit adds that Clinton and others are guilty of obstructing justice and more, including hacking into the former president's private communications.
“The actions taken in furtherance of their scheme — falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources — are so outrageous, subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison,” the complaint continues.
The suit adds, “When their gambit failed, and Donald J. Trump was elected, the Defendants’ efforts continued unabated, merely shifting their focus to undermining his presidential administration.”
The former president's suit claims that the Defendants' conduct violates the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, making those named in the suit guilty of conspiracy, injurious falsehood, malicious prosecution, computer fraud and abuse, theft of trade secrets, and more.
Trump filed the suit on Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Fort Pierce, where, during his term, he appointed 7 of the 16 current judges. The former president's suit requests a trial by jury and seeks at least $72 million in damages — a sum reported to be legal fees and other associated costs.
“For years, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts attempted to shield themselves from culpability by directing others to do their dirty work for them. This lawsuit seeks to hold all parties accountable for their heinous acts and uphold the principles of our sacred democracy,” Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, told CNBC in an emailed statement on the suit.
Read more🗞 The Blaze, The Federalist, Trump Lawsuit
Hat tip🤠 Adam Carter @TheWashingtonPundit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Former President Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and others for purportedly conspiring to overthrow his presidency and cripple his presidential campaign.
What are the details?
The massive 108-page complaint accuses the former secretary of state and Democratic allies — including Clinton campaign aides, former FBI Director James Comey, the Democratic National Convention, and others — of engaging in an "unthinkable plot" to falsely accuse him of colluding with Russia during the 2016 presidential cycle and subsequent election.
A portion of the petition states, "In the run-up to the 2016 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts orchestrated an unthinkable plot – one that shocks the conscience and is an affront to this nation’s democracy. Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty.”
Others named in the suit include former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former Clinton campaign head John Podesta, and former FBI officials Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page.
The Trump suit alleges that Clinton and her Democratic cohorts crafted a falsified link between the former president's campaign and Russia, which ultimately triggered an "unfounded federal investigation" as well as a "media frenzy."
"Under the guise of 'opposition research,' 'data analytics,' and other political stratagems, the Defendants nefariously sought to sway the public's trust," another portion of the lawsuit says. "They worked together with a single, self-serving purpose: to vilify Donald J. Trump."
The suit adds that Clinton and others are guilty of obstructing justice and more, including hacking into the former president's private communications.
“The actions taken in furtherance of their scheme — falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources — are so outrageous, subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison,” the complaint continues.
The suit adds, “When their gambit failed, and Donald J. Trump was elected, the Defendants’ efforts continued unabated, merely shifting their focus to undermining his presidential administration.”
The former president's suit claims that the Defendants' conduct violates the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, making those named in the suit guilty of conspiracy, injurious falsehood, malicious prosecution, computer fraud and abuse, theft of trade secrets, and more.
Trump filed the suit on Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Fort Pierce, where, during his term, he appointed 7 of the 16 current judges. The former president's suit requests a trial by jury and seeks at least $72 million in damages — a sum reported to be legal fees and other associated costs.
“For years, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts attempted to shield themselves from culpability by directing others to do their dirty work for them. This lawsuit seeks to hold all parties accountable for their heinous acts and uphold the principles of our sacred democracy,” Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, told CNBC in an emailed statement on the suit.
Read more🗞 The Blaze, The Federalist, Trump Lawsuit
Hat tip🤠 Adam Carter @TheWashingtonPundit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Blaze Media
Donald Trump hits Hillary Clinton, DNC, and more with lawsuit over Russian collusion allegations | Blaze Media
Former President Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and others for purportedly conspiring to overthrow his presidency and cripple his presidential campaign. What are the details?
The massive
108-page…
The massive
108-page…
🔥249👍68❤10👏9😁4
Insights on Trump’s Russia Hoax Lawsuit From The Washington Pundit
The Washington Pundit Assistant Editor Adam Carter made an interesting connection between Trump’s lawsuit against Hilary and the Russia hoax colluders and Alan Dershowitz’s RICO case against Dominion. Referencing a discussion by attorneys Robert Barnes and Viva Frei, Carter writes:
“At the 2:20 min mark, Robert Barnes talks about civil RICO lawsuits and how they differ from criminal RICO cases.
It is useful to listen to understand the lawsuit President Trump filed against Hillary Clinton, the Clinton campaign, FusionGPS, former FBI/DOJ officials, and others for their roles in the Russia Collusion Hoax.”
In a second Telegram post, Carter elaborates:
“Unlike criminal RICO cases, civil RICO lawsuits almost never get past the motion to dismiss. I hate to say it, but the chances of President Trump succeeding in the suit are very low. He probably knows this however and is bringing the case for other reasons.
By filing the lawsuit, Trump is shielding himself from defamation claims. Allegations in legal filings are mostly immune from defamation. It allows him to put out the facts about what happened without fear countersuits being filed in hostile jurisdictions. It also allows Pro-Trump (or honest) media to report on the allegations because reporting on what is contained in legal filings gives journalists immunity from libel. The Mueller team used this tactic ALL THE TIME as did Little Binger in the Rittenhouse trial to relentlessly smear the kid, and allowed hacks like Morning Joe and CNN to just run with it.
Things to watch for:
A. Does Trump survive the motion to dismiss? Clearing that hurdle alone would be a huge win as we've seen in some of the Project Veritas cases.
B. President Trump was very smart to bring the case in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) where he at least has a chance of being assigned an honest, impartial, and fair judge. The defendants will probably attempt to get the case transferred from SDFL to either DC or New York (SDNY). If that happens, it's just a matter of time before it gets dismissed.”
Learn more🗞 Trump’s Russia Hoax RICO Case
@TheWashingtonPundit
—
The Washington Pundit Assistant Editor Adam Carter made an interesting connection between Trump’s lawsuit against Hilary and the Russia hoax colluders and Alan Dershowitz’s RICO case against Dominion. Referencing a discussion by attorneys Robert Barnes and Viva Frei, Carter writes:
“At the 2:20 min mark, Robert Barnes talks about civil RICO lawsuits and how they differ from criminal RICO cases.
It is useful to listen to understand the lawsuit President Trump filed against Hillary Clinton, the Clinton campaign, FusionGPS, former FBI/DOJ officials, and others for their roles in the Russia Collusion Hoax.”
In a second Telegram post, Carter elaborates:
“Unlike criminal RICO cases, civil RICO lawsuits almost never get past the motion to dismiss. I hate to say it, but the chances of President Trump succeeding in the suit are very low. He probably knows this however and is bringing the case for other reasons.
By filing the lawsuit, Trump is shielding himself from defamation claims. Allegations in legal filings are mostly immune from defamation. It allows him to put out the facts about what happened without fear countersuits being filed in hostile jurisdictions. It also allows Pro-Trump (or honest) media to report on the allegations because reporting on what is contained in legal filings gives journalists immunity from libel. The Mueller team used this tactic ALL THE TIME as did Little Binger in the Rittenhouse trial to relentlessly smear the kid, and allowed hacks like Morning Joe and CNN to just run with it.
Things to watch for:
A. Does Trump survive the motion to dismiss? Clearing that hurdle alone would be a huge win as we've seen in some of the Project Veritas cases.
B. President Trump was very smart to bring the case in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) where he at least has a chance of being assigned an honest, impartial, and fair judge. The defendants will probably attempt to get the case transferred from SDFL to either DC or New York (SDNY). If that happens, it's just a matter of time before it gets dismissed.”
Learn more🗞 Trump’s Russia Hoax RICO Case
@TheWashingtonPundit
—
Telegram
The Washington Pundit
Pulled this Viva/Barnes clip about the Alan Dershowitz suit against Dominion for another story I'm working on. At the 2:20 min mark, Robert Barnes talks about civil RICO lawsuits and how they differ from criminal RICO cases.
It is useful to listen to understand…
It is useful to listen to understand…
👍90🔥21❤5
The Reset of the ‘Great Reset’ | Victor Davis Hanson
President Joe Biden believes the Ukraine war will mark the start of a “new world order.” In the middle of the COVID global pandemic, Klaus Schwab and global elites likewise announced a “great reset.”
Accordingly, the nations of the world would have to surrender their sovereignty to an international body of experts. They would enlighten us on taxes, diversity and green policies.
In normal times progressives worry that they do not have public support for their policies. Only in crises do they feel that the political Left and media can merge to use apocalyptic times to ram through usually unpopular approaches to foreign and domestic problems.
We saw that last year: fleeing from Afghanistan, the embrace of critical race theory, trying to end the filibuster, pack the court, junk the Electoral College and nationalize voting laws.
These “new orders” and “resets” always entail far bigger government and more unelected, powerful bureaucracies. Elites assume that their radical changes in energy use, media reporting, voting, sovereignty, and racial and ethnic quotas will never quite apply to themselves, the architects of such top-down changes.
So we common folk must quit fossil fuels, but not those who need to use corporate jets. Walls will not mar our borders but will protect the homes of Nancy Pelosi, Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates.
Hunter Biden’s lost laptop will be declared, by fiat, not news. In contrast, the fake Alfa Bank “collusion” narrative will be national headline news for weeks.
Middle class lifestyles will be curbed as we are instructed to strive for sustainability and transition to apartment living and mass transit. But the Obamas will still keep their three mansions, and Silicon Valley futurists will insist on exemptions for their yachts.
In truth, we are about to see a radical reset – of the current reset. It will be a different sort of transformation than the elites are expecting and one that Biden and the Davos set should greatly fear.
In the November 2022 midterms, we are likely to see a historic “No!” to the orthodox left-wing agenda that has resulted in unsustainable inflation, unaffordable energy, war, and humiliation abroad, spiraling crime, racial hostility – as well as arrogant defiance from those who deliberately enacted these disastrous policies.
The prophets of the new world order sowed the wind and they will soon reap the whirlwind of an angry public worn out by elite incompetence, arrogance, and ignorance.
Read more🗞 Victor Davis Hanson Daily Caller
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
President Joe Biden believes the Ukraine war will mark the start of a “new world order.” In the middle of the COVID global pandemic, Klaus Schwab and global elites likewise announced a “great reset.”
Accordingly, the nations of the world would have to surrender their sovereignty to an international body of experts. They would enlighten us on taxes, diversity and green policies.
In normal times progressives worry that they do not have public support for their policies. Only in crises do they feel that the political Left and media can merge to use apocalyptic times to ram through usually unpopular approaches to foreign and domestic problems.
We saw that last year: fleeing from Afghanistan, the embrace of critical race theory, trying to end the filibuster, pack the court, junk the Electoral College and nationalize voting laws.
These “new orders” and “resets” always entail far bigger government and more unelected, powerful bureaucracies. Elites assume that their radical changes in energy use, media reporting, voting, sovereignty, and racial and ethnic quotas will never quite apply to themselves, the architects of such top-down changes.
So we common folk must quit fossil fuels, but not those who need to use corporate jets. Walls will not mar our borders but will protect the homes of Nancy Pelosi, Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates.
Hunter Biden’s lost laptop will be declared, by fiat, not news. In contrast, the fake Alfa Bank “collusion” narrative will be national headline news for weeks.
Middle class lifestyles will be curbed as we are instructed to strive for sustainability and transition to apartment living and mass transit. But the Obamas will still keep their three mansions, and Silicon Valley futurists will insist on exemptions for their yachts.
In truth, we are about to see a radical reset – of the current reset. It will be a different sort of transformation than the elites are expecting and one that Biden and the Davos set should greatly fear.
In the November 2022 midterms, we are likely to see a historic “No!” to the orthodox left-wing agenda that has resulted in unsustainable inflation, unaffordable energy, war, and humiliation abroad, spiraling crime, racial hostility – as well as arrogant defiance from those who deliberately enacted these disastrous policies.
The prophets of the new world order sowed the wind and they will soon reap the whirlwind of an angry public worn out by elite incompetence, arrogance, and ignorance.
Read more🗞 Victor Davis Hanson Daily Caller
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Daily Caller
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: The Real ‘Reset’ Is Coming
Global Elites will find out in November that regular people will reject their sweeping changes to the social fabric of the West.
🔥240👍101👏19❤15🤬10😢3🥰2🤩2
More Maricopa County Word Games | Patrick Colbeck
The Maricopa County Special Master router and Splunk logs report is remarkable in its lack of details. It appears that they are attempting to play the same word games in this report that are used by vendors to convince election officials that their systems are “air gapped.” The authors of the report appear to be focused upon assuaging the letter of the questions asked as opposed to assuaging the security concerns behind the questions.
The report authors concluded that since there were no BTC routers or managed devices, there was no “public internet” connection and therefore no information worth capturing related to Splunk logs.
Their use of these terms begs a few follow-up questions. For example:
• How do you define “public internet”?
• How do you define “air gapped”? Many technology vendors assert that there is equipment is “air gapped” merely because they use a VPN or firewall. These security measures are still vulnerable to intrusion by interested third parties.
• How did the BTC equipment receive election results from the precincts? Is there verified log data or other evidence which validates this assertion.
• Was the EMS server connected to any other devices? If so, what devices? How were they connected?
• How did the EMS server receive software updates? Who administered these updates and when?
• Were any wireless devices installed on the EMS server? In Mesa County, CO, 36 wireless devices were found connected to the EMS server.
• Were any TCP/IP connections evident for election equipment in the BTC?
• The Dominion D-Suite is installed on a Windows-based platform. Did anyone review Windows logs such as the event log or resource monitor for evidence of TCP/IP connections?
• Was any equipment in the BTC connected to any other equipment in the BTC? If so, how?
• Was any equipment in the BTC connected to equipment in the MCTEC? This equipment does not have to be election equipment. It could be a printer or scanner or even a thermostat as evidenced in Georgia.
• What are the names of the County personnel who continually monitored the access to electronic equipment in the OET?
• How do the authors’ claims reconcile with evidence provided by forensic experts such as Ben Cotton which provided evidence of internet connections?
…and that’s just for starters.
Lead AZ auditor Doug Logan compared AZ Senate President Karen Fann’s Special Master agreement to “playing blind chess.” It was a losing arrangement designed to deliver no meaningful information, Nick Moseder explained in a recent Rumble cast.
“Without receiving answers to the recommended follow-up questions, I do not believe it is reasonable to conclude that there were no connections to the internet – public or private,” Colbeck concludes.
Read more🗞 Patrick Colbeck Let’s Fix Stuff
Watch 📺 Nick Moseder Debunks the Special Master Report
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Maricopa County Special Master router and Splunk logs report is remarkable in its lack of details. It appears that they are attempting to play the same word games in this report that are used by vendors to convince election officials that their systems are “air gapped.” The authors of the report appear to be focused upon assuaging the letter of the questions asked as opposed to assuaging the security concerns behind the questions.
The report authors concluded that since there were no BTC routers or managed devices, there was no “public internet” connection and therefore no information worth capturing related to Splunk logs.
Their use of these terms begs a few follow-up questions. For example:
• How do you define “public internet”?
• How do you define “air gapped”? Many technology vendors assert that there is equipment is “air gapped” merely because they use a VPN or firewall. These security measures are still vulnerable to intrusion by interested third parties.
• How did the BTC equipment receive election results from the precincts? Is there verified log data or other evidence which validates this assertion.
• Was the EMS server connected to any other devices? If so, what devices? How were they connected?
• How did the EMS server receive software updates? Who administered these updates and when?
• Were any wireless devices installed on the EMS server? In Mesa County, CO, 36 wireless devices were found connected to the EMS server.
• Were any TCP/IP connections evident for election equipment in the BTC?
• The Dominion D-Suite is installed on a Windows-based platform. Did anyone review Windows logs such as the event log or resource monitor for evidence of TCP/IP connections?
• Was any equipment in the BTC connected to any other equipment in the BTC? If so, how?
• Was any equipment in the BTC connected to equipment in the MCTEC? This equipment does not have to be election equipment. It could be a printer or scanner or even a thermostat as evidenced in Georgia.
• What are the names of the County personnel who continually monitored the access to electronic equipment in the OET?
• How do the authors’ claims reconcile with evidence provided by forensic experts such as Ben Cotton which provided evidence of internet connections?
…and that’s just for starters.
Lead AZ auditor Doug Logan compared AZ Senate President Karen Fann’s Special Master agreement to “playing blind chess.” It was a losing arrangement designed to deliver no meaningful information, Nick Moseder explained in a recent Rumble cast.
“Without receiving answers to the recommended follow-up questions, I do not believe it is reasonable to conclude that there were no connections to the internet – public or private,” Colbeck concludes.
Read more🗞 Patrick Colbeck Let’s Fix Stuff
Watch 📺 Nick Moseder Debunks the Special Master Report
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍71🔥20🤬8🥰1👏1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Alabama Attorney General Refuses to Agree That Biden Is the ‘Duly Elected’ President
Testifying against Judge Jackson’s SCOTUS nomination, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall (R) repeatedly sidesteps direct questions from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) about whether President Biden is the “duly elected and lawfully serving” president.
Source 👉 The Recount
Longer clip 📺 Now This
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Testifying against Judge Jackson’s SCOTUS nomination, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall (R) repeatedly sidesteps direct questions from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) about whether President Biden is the “duly elected and lawfully serving” president.
Source 👉 The Recount
Longer clip 📺 Now This
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
🔥296👏79👍34❤26🥰10😁9
Election Integrity Progress Report | Wendi Strauch Mahoney UncoverDC
UncoverDC’s Wendi Strauch Mahoney has corralled the major election integrity efforts by state legislatures into an impressive progress report:
• Eight states enacted laws in 2021 and 2022 that impose new or stricter voter ID requirements: AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, MT, TX, and WY.
• Thirteen states put legislation in place to restrict mail-in voting: AL, AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, ID, KS, LA, MT, ND, OK, and TX. Iowa appears to be the only state to restrict early voting so far. Every Democrat opposed it.
• Five states have legislation under consideration that would ban or restrict drop boxes. SC’s H3444 and WI’s S939 have each passed both House and Senate. Drop box related bills have passed the first chamber in GA, AZ, and ID. None have yet been signed into law.
• Five states tightened voter registration laws and requirements: IA, MT, NH, TX, and UT. Arizona’s House and Senate recently passed a law requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote. That bill is heading to Gov. Ducey’s desk for final approval.
• Eighteen states created or expanded legislation regarding “election-related crimes”: AZ, AR, CA, FL, GA, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ND, NV, TX, UT, VA, WA, WV, and WY. In addition, NJ prohibited certain electioneering activities, and HI increased the maximum fine for providing false information to $10K.
• Eleven states have either banned or severely restricted the acceptance and use of private funds for state and local elections: AZ, AK, FL, GA, ID, KS, MS, ND, OH, TN, and TX. Another 5 states have passed anti-Zuckerbucks legislation that is awaiting a Republican governor’s signature: AL, IN, OK, SD and VA.
• Ten states strengthened processes related to “ballot return, verification, and curing” that “restrict voter access”: AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, KS, LA, MT, TX, and UT.
• Two counties have passed resolutions to eliminate voting machines: Nye County, NV and Rio Blanco County, CO. “Just over 3,100 [counties] to go,” Seth Keshel posted.
• Texas and Arizona have been two of the most active states in terms of strengthening election integrity laws. Arkansas, Montana, North Dakota, Georgia, and Florida have also made a good showing.
• Michigan and Pennsylvania have made the least progress - they “stand out as two states that have done very little legislatively to advance public trust in elections through legislation,” Wendi noted.
Read more🗞 Wendi Strauch Mahoney UncoverDC
Related🔎 Election Integrity Scorecard, Twenty-Two States Fight Back Against Zuckerbucks Subversion
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
UncoverDC’s Wendi Strauch Mahoney has corralled the major election integrity efforts by state legislatures into an impressive progress report:
• Eight states enacted laws in 2021 and 2022 that impose new or stricter voter ID requirements: AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, MT, TX, and WY.
• Thirteen states put legislation in place to restrict mail-in voting: AL, AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, ID, KS, LA, MT, ND, OK, and TX. Iowa appears to be the only state to restrict early voting so far. Every Democrat opposed it.
• Five states have legislation under consideration that would ban or restrict drop boxes. SC’s H3444 and WI’s S939 have each passed both House and Senate. Drop box related bills have passed the first chamber in GA, AZ, and ID. None have yet been signed into law.
• Five states tightened voter registration laws and requirements: IA, MT, NH, TX, and UT. Arizona’s House and Senate recently passed a law requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote. That bill is heading to Gov. Ducey’s desk for final approval.
• Eighteen states created or expanded legislation regarding “election-related crimes”: AZ, AR, CA, FL, GA, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ND, NV, TX, UT, VA, WA, WV, and WY. In addition, NJ prohibited certain electioneering activities, and HI increased the maximum fine for providing false information to $10K.
• Eleven states have either banned or severely restricted the acceptance and use of private funds for state and local elections: AZ, AK, FL, GA, ID, KS, MS, ND, OH, TN, and TX. Another 5 states have passed anti-Zuckerbucks legislation that is awaiting a Republican governor’s signature: AL, IN, OK, SD and VA.
• Ten states strengthened processes related to “ballot return, verification, and curing” that “restrict voter access”: AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, KS, LA, MT, TX, and UT.
• Two counties have passed resolutions to eliminate voting machines: Nye County, NV and Rio Blanco County, CO. “Just over 3,100 [counties] to go,” Seth Keshel posted.
• Texas and Arizona have been two of the most active states in terms of strengthening election integrity laws. Arkansas, Montana, North Dakota, Georgia, and Florida have also made a good showing.
• Michigan and Pennsylvania have made the least progress - they “stand out as two states that have done very little legislatively to advance public trust in elections through legislation,” Wendi noted.
Read more🗞 Wendi Strauch Mahoney UncoverDC
Related🔎 Election Integrity Scorecard, Twenty-Two States Fight Back Against Zuckerbucks Subversion
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
UncoverDC
Election Integrity: Review of Notable State Legislation and Issues
Election integrity has been under scrutiny since the November 2020 general election, and many state legislatures have made attempts to beef up legislation to ensure greater confidence in future elections. Significant areas of focus for election integrity…
👍123👏14🔥12❤8🥰2🎉1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trump’s Russia Hoax RICO Case Scheduled to Be Heard by a Clinton-Appointed Judge: ‘How Do You Think That’s Going to Go?’
“Donald Trump’s 108 page lawsuit will be heard by U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks, who was appointed by Bill Clinton and in 2015, and threw out the civil racketeering suit filed against Hillary Clinton dealing with her private email server.
I wonder what will happen 🤦🏼♂️
At least Trump is calling on the judge to recuse himself from the case for these very reasons,” Nick Moseder posted on Telegram tonight.
Learn more🔎 Trump’s RICO Case
Sources 👉 @Behizy, @WILFMoseder
“Donald Trump’s 108 page lawsuit will be heard by U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks, who was appointed by Bill Clinton and in 2015, and threw out the civil racketeering suit filed against Hillary Clinton dealing with her private email server.
I wonder what will happen 🤦🏼♂️
At least Trump is calling on the judge to recuse himself from the case for these very reasons,” Nick Moseder posted on Telegram tonight.
Learn more🔎 Trump’s RICO Case
Sources 👉 @Behizy, @WILFMoseder
👍186🔥40😁12👏6😢5🤬2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Gaffe Machine Just Moved Us Closer to World War III
“Never underestimate Joe Biden’s ability to f*ck things up,” Obama famously said of his then-VP.
On a trip to the Ukrainian border this weekend, Joe Biden lost no time living up to that low standard, telling an audience in Poland, “For God’s sake, this man [Putin] cannot remain in power.”
Richard Haass, the Council on Foreign Relations president, tweeted his concerns that Biden had “just expanded US war aims, calling for regime change,” the Daily Mail reported.
“It is not within our power to accomplish - plus runs risk it will increase Putin's inclination to see this as a fight to the finish, raising odds he will reject compromise, escalate, or both,” wrote Haass.
Read more🗞 Daily Mail
Video via Wittgenstein
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
“Never underestimate Joe Biden’s ability to f*ck things up,” Obama famously said of his then-VP.
On a trip to the Ukrainian border this weekend, Joe Biden lost no time living up to that low standard, telling an audience in Poland, “For God’s sake, this man [Putin] cannot remain in power.”
Richard Haass, the Council on Foreign Relations president, tweeted his concerns that Biden had “just expanded US war aims, calling for regime change,” the Daily Mail reported.
“It is not within our power to accomplish - plus runs risk it will increase Putin's inclination to see this as a fight to the finish, raising odds he will reject compromise, escalate, or both,” wrote Haass.
Read more🗞 Daily Mail
Video via Wittgenstein
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
🤬93👍30😁6😢2
‘Clean Up on Aisle Joe’
“Joe Biden is now the most dangerous man in the world.”
- Nigel Farage
The White House immediately shifted to damage control after Biden called for regime change in Russia, stating that the Commander in Thief’s “comments are not official US policy,” and later back-pedaling:
“The President's point was that Putin cannot be allowed to exercise power over his neighbors or the region. He was not discussing Putin's power in Russia, or regime change,” a White House circus ring official said.
Sources: Nigel Farage tweet 1 (modified), tweet 2, Jacqui Heinrich, Daily Mail
Hat tip🤠 @RealKarliBonne
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
“Joe Biden is now the most dangerous man in the world.”
- Nigel Farage
The White House immediately shifted to damage control after Biden called for regime change in Russia, stating that the Commander in Thief’s “comments are not official US policy,” and later back-pedaling:
“The President's point was that Putin cannot be allowed to exercise power over his neighbors or the region. He was not discussing Putin's power in Russia, or regime change,” a White House circus ring official said.
Sources: Nigel Farage tweet 1 (modified), tweet 2, Jacqui Heinrich, Daily Mail
Hat tip🤠 @RealKarliBonne
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍94😁55🔥12🤯7
Russia Regime Change Always the Plan?
Jack Posobiec believes dethroning Putin may have always been part of the New World Order oligarchs’ plan. On Saturday, he tweeted:
“The regime’s goal was to use Ukraine as a launching pad for regime change operations against Russia.
This was always the plan, only you don’t usually hear the president openly admitting it.”
Posobiec pointed out that the “Director of the CIA straight up admitted the agenda publicly” back in October 2020:
“Imagine prospects for world peace, prosperity, & security if Joe Biden were President of the United States & Alexei Navalny the President of Russia. We’ll soon be halfway there,” John Brennan tweeted.
Responding to Posobiec, David Avocado Wolfe commented:
“The CIA believes they are invincible now. They’ve gotten away with 70+ years of toppling regime after regime including the Trump Presidency. Is Putin going to end their winning streak?”
Sources: Brennan, Posobiec tweet1, tweet2
Related🔎 Putin Trashes WEF
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Jack Posobiec believes dethroning Putin may have always been part of the New World Order oligarchs’ plan. On Saturday, he tweeted:
“The regime’s goal was to use Ukraine as a launching pad for regime change operations against Russia.
This was always the plan, only you don’t usually hear the president openly admitting it.”
Posobiec pointed out that the “Director of the CIA straight up admitted the agenda publicly” back in October 2020:
“Imagine prospects for world peace, prosperity, & security if Joe Biden were President of the United States & Alexei Navalny the President of Russia. We’ll soon be halfway there,” John Brennan tweeted.
Responding to Posobiec, David Avocado Wolfe commented:
“The CIA believes they are invincible now. They’ve gotten away with 70+ years of toppling regime after regime including the Trump Presidency. Is Putin going to end their winning streak?”
Sources: Brennan, Posobiec tweet1, tweet2
Related🔎 Putin Trashes WEF
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
🔥146🤬42👍40
WSJ: ‘The President Should Avoid Public Speaking’
“Some issues are just too important to be left to an unscripted Joe Biden,” a WSJ op-ed began today. “These are dangerous times and we would all be much safer if Mr. Biden would make greater use of prepared statements on subjects such as, for example, weapons of mass destruction.”
The article continues, “Two months after a bumbling press conference in which Mr. Biden implied that a ‘minor incursion’ by Russia into Ukraine might be tolerable to the U.S. and its allies, the President flew to Europe this week and somehow ended up taking questions from reporters…
[Biden] does not appear to be up to the task. While we consider the implications, Mr. Biden should try to say as little as possible in public during an international crisis.”
Michael Morell, Obama’s Deputy Director of the CIA, seems to agree, calling Biden’s imbecilic Russia regime change blunder “an unforced error,” on Face the Nation today. Watch: https://t.iss.one/realKarliBonne/82225
Read more🗞 WSJ
Video 🤠 @RealKarliBonne
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
“Some issues are just too important to be left to an unscripted Joe Biden,” a WSJ op-ed began today. “These are dangerous times and we would all be much safer if Mr. Biden would make greater use of prepared statements on subjects such as, for example, weapons of mass destruction.”
The article continues, “Two months after a bumbling press conference in which Mr. Biden implied that a ‘minor incursion’ by Russia into Ukraine might be tolerable to the U.S. and its allies, the President flew to Europe this week and somehow ended up taking questions from reporters…
[Biden] does not appear to be up to the task. While we consider the implications, Mr. Biden should try to say as little as possible in public during an international crisis.”
Michael Morell, Obama’s Deputy Director of the CIA, seems to agree, calling Biden’s imbecilic Russia regime change blunder “an unforced error,” on Face the Nation today. Watch: https://t.iss.one/realKarliBonne/82225
Read more🗞 WSJ
Video 🤠 @RealKarliBonne
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Telegram
Midnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸
This is Obama’s former CIA saying this?
👍97🔥26😁25👏9
Washington Is Delirious With War Fever | David Stockman
Economic, social and political dangers abound. That’s because Washington and its subservient mainstream media are delirious with war fever like at no time in the last seven decades.
The resulting reckless pursuit of an unhinged Sanctions War against Russia poses a dire threat to the global economy and domestic prosperity and does so for no good reason of homeland security whatsoever.
With respect to the latter, the sheer facts are overwhelming. To wit, the economic might of NATO is 29X that of Russia and its combined defense budgets are 18X greater, which tells you all you need to know about the “Russian threat.”
Given these realities, why should Washington care about an intramural battle among contiguous peoples and territories that have been joined at the hip for most of the last 1300 years?
The implicit answer is because it’s the world’s self-appointed policeman and Spanker-in-Chief.
Beyond that, it’s apparently due to a putative aggrandizement syndrome. That is, Putin’s Russia may be puny in the economic and military scheme of things today, but once it is permitted to acquire a taste for conquest it is certain to grow into a Hitlerian monster.
Needless to say, the former reason is based on Washington’s institutionalized arrogance and has no place at all in realistic thinking about national security, while the latter is based on sheer ignorance about the actual history of Hitler’s conquests.
The truth is, there was nothing inexorable about it. To the contrary, Hitler was a product of a specific, unique and unfortunate history that bears no resemblance to current circumstances on the Ukrainian/Russian line of conflict. In fact, Hitler’s original expansion was rooted in deep German grievances about its territorial, industrial and financial (i.e. onerous reparations) decapitation by the vengeful winners at Versailles. Stated differently, Hitler was the metastasized residue of history gone wrong, not the inexorable product of annexing.
The fact is, Ukraine is the Poland and Czechoslovakia of the present time – an artificial state loaded with Russians and with no reason for existence in its present form and girth. Well, still again, other than Washington’s fanatical insistence that the happenstance map of administrative units which fell out of the Soviet Union’s collapse constitute sacred borders that must be preserved at all hazards.
What Putin wants, ironically, is the pre-communist status quo ante. That is, he wants Crimea, where Ukrainians constitute but a tiny minority and which had been Russian since 1783. And, more crucially, which hosts the greatest strategic military asset possessed by Russia thereafter — the great Naval base at the headwaters of the Black Sea in Sevastopol.
Likewise, the Donbas and territories east of the Dnieper River and along the northern edge of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov have been Russian for upwards of 300 years. By all facts of pre-1922 history, these territories amounted to Novorossiya (“New Russia”) as shown in the map from 1897.
As it happened, they became “Ukrainian” only by writ of two of history’s greatest evil monsters – Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin – who placed them in the administrative unit of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic for reasons that have no historic validity whatsoever.
Yet a devastating war goes on there today – a war which is careening to the precipice of WWIII – because Washington encourages Kiev to insist on retention of “every inch” of a map put together by Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev.
The violation of Ukraine’s putative borders is only the excuse for Washington hegemonic determination to call the shots in the former Soviet Union – just like it has attempted to do elsewhere on the planet during the last 70 years. [And it has the added benefit of] making it easy as pie for Biden and his national security minions to distract the American public from the abysmal failure of their domestic policies.
Read more🗞 David Stockman Contra Corner via ZeroHedge
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Economic, social and political dangers abound. That’s because Washington and its subservient mainstream media are delirious with war fever like at no time in the last seven decades.
The resulting reckless pursuit of an unhinged Sanctions War against Russia poses a dire threat to the global economy and domestic prosperity and does so for no good reason of homeland security whatsoever.
With respect to the latter, the sheer facts are overwhelming. To wit, the economic might of NATO is 29X that of Russia and its combined defense budgets are 18X greater, which tells you all you need to know about the “Russian threat.”
Given these realities, why should Washington care about an intramural battle among contiguous peoples and territories that have been joined at the hip for most of the last 1300 years?
The implicit answer is because it’s the world’s self-appointed policeman and Spanker-in-Chief.
Beyond that, it’s apparently due to a putative aggrandizement syndrome. That is, Putin’s Russia may be puny in the economic and military scheme of things today, but once it is permitted to acquire a taste for conquest it is certain to grow into a Hitlerian monster.
Needless to say, the former reason is based on Washington’s institutionalized arrogance and has no place at all in realistic thinking about national security, while the latter is based on sheer ignorance about the actual history of Hitler’s conquests.
The truth is, there was nothing inexorable about it. To the contrary, Hitler was a product of a specific, unique and unfortunate history that bears no resemblance to current circumstances on the Ukrainian/Russian line of conflict. In fact, Hitler’s original expansion was rooted in deep German grievances about its territorial, industrial and financial (i.e. onerous reparations) decapitation by the vengeful winners at Versailles. Stated differently, Hitler was the metastasized residue of history gone wrong, not the inexorable product of annexing.
The fact is, Ukraine is the Poland and Czechoslovakia of the present time – an artificial state loaded with Russians and with no reason for existence in its present form and girth. Well, still again, other than Washington’s fanatical insistence that the happenstance map of administrative units which fell out of the Soviet Union’s collapse constitute sacred borders that must be preserved at all hazards.
What Putin wants, ironically, is the pre-communist status quo ante. That is, he wants Crimea, where Ukrainians constitute but a tiny minority and which had been Russian since 1783. And, more crucially, which hosts the greatest strategic military asset possessed by Russia thereafter — the great Naval base at the headwaters of the Black Sea in Sevastopol.
Likewise, the Donbas and territories east of the Dnieper River and along the northern edge of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov have been Russian for upwards of 300 years. By all facts of pre-1922 history, these territories amounted to Novorossiya (“New Russia”) as shown in the map from 1897.
As it happened, they became “Ukrainian” only by writ of two of history’s greatest evil monsters – Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin – who placed them in the administrative unit of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic for reasons that have no historic validity whatsoever.
Yet a devastating war goes on there today – a war which is careening to the precipice of WWIII – because Washington encourages Kiev to insist on retention of “every inch” of a map put together by Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev.
The violation of Ukraine’s putative borders is only the excuse for Washington hegemonic determination to call the shots in the former Soviet Union – just like it has attempted to do elsewhere on the planet during the last 70 years. [And it has the added benefit of] making it easy as pie for Biden and his national security minions to distract the American public from the abysmal failure of their domestic policies.
Read more🗞 David Stockman Contra Corner via ZeroHedge
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
🔥65👍54🤬29👏3🤔2
New Peer-Reviewed Research Finds Evidence of at Least 220K Excess Biden Votes in 6 Key Swing States | Real Clear Politics
A new study by John R. Lott forthcoming in the peer-reviewed economics journal Public Choice finds evidence of at least 255,000 excess votes (possibly as many as 368,000) for Joe Biden in six swing states where Donald Trump lodged accusations of fraud. Biden only carried these states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – by a total of 313,253 votes. Excluding Michigan, the gap was 159,065.
Lott notes that while some judges have agreed that irregularities occurred in 2020, they were unwilling to grant discovery in the absence of evidence that fraud could reverse the election results. Republicans thus faced a Catch-22 situation.
Recounts haven’t been useful in resolving fraud concerns, as they merely involve recounting the same potentially fraudulent ballots.
Signature verification is “ripe for error,” and amidst unprecedented numbers of mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, many states didn’t even try to authenticate signatures. If someone mailed in multiple ballots, there was virtually no way to catch them. Without tamper-resistant photo ID requirements, absentee voting fraud is difficult to prove.
Lott’s research provides three tests of election fraud:
1) First, he compared precincts in a county with alleged fraud to adjacent, similar precincts in neighboring counties with no fraud allegations. Precincts tend to be small, homogeneous areas, and many consist of fewer than a thousand registered voters.
We can try to detect absentee or mail-in ballot fraud by comparing the results in bordering precincts that happen to fall on opposite sides of a county line. These precincts will tend to be virtually identical to each other – voters may simply be on the other side of the street from their precinct neighbors.
In 2016, there was no unexplained gap in absentee ballot counts. But 2020 was a different story. Just in Fulton County, Georgia, Lott’s test yielded an unexplained 17,000 votes – 32% more than Biden’s margin over Trump in the entire state.
With the focus on winning the state, there is no apparent reason why Democrats would get out the absentee ballot vote more in one precinct than in a neighboring precinct with similar political and demographic characteristics.
2) Next Lott applied the same method to provisional ballots in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Contrary to state law, voters were allegedly allowed to correct defects in absentee ballots by submitting provisional ballots on Election Day. His analysis found that such permissions in Allegheny County alone contributed to a statistically significant 6,700 additional votes for Biden – in a state decided by fewer than 81,000 votes.
3) Finally, artificially large voter turnouts can also be a sign of vote fraud. This fraud could come in the form of filling out absentee ballots for people who didn’t vote, voting by ineligible people, or bribing people for their votes.
Republican-leaning swing state counties had higher turnouts relative to the 2016 election. Democratic-leaning counties had lower turnouts, except for the Democratic counties with alleged vote fraud, which had very high turnouts.
Lott believes his estimates likely understate the true amount of cheating in these states as he did not attempt to ascertain possible in-person voting fraud. There are numerous allegations of ineligible in-person voters in Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. For example, in Fulton County, Georgia, 2,423 voters were not listed as registered on the state’s records, and 2,560 felons voted even though they had not completed their sentences.
Compared to Europe and other developed countries, America is unique in its lax approach to vote fraud. When all demographic and political groups in the U.S. support voter photo IDs and even 46% of Democrats believe that mail-in voting leads to cheating, ignoring Americans’ concerns won’t make the problem go away.
Read more🗞 Real Clear Politics
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
A new study by John R. Lott forthcoming in the peer-reviewed economics journal Public Choice finds evidence of at least 255,000 excess votes (possibly as many as 368,000) for Joe Biden in six swing states where Donald Trump lodged accusations of fraud. Biden only carried these states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – by a total of 313,253 votes. Excluding Michigan, the gap was 159,065.
Lott notes that while some judges have agreed that irregularities occurred in 2020, they were unwilling to grant discovery in the absence of evidence that fraud could reverse the election results. Republicans thus faced a Catch-22 situation.
Recounts haven’t been useful in resolving fraud concerns, as they merely involve recounting the same potentially fraudulent ballots.
Signature verification is “ripe for error,” and amidst unprecedented numbers of mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, many states didn’t even try to authenticate signatures. If someone mailed in multiple ballots, there was virtually no way to catch them. Without tamper-resistant photo ID requirements, absentee voting fraud is difficult to prove.
Lott’s research provides three tests of election fraud:
1) First, he compared precincts in a county with alleged fraud to adjacent, similar precincts in neighboring counties with no fraud allegations. Precincts tend to be small, homogeneous areas, and many consist of fewer than a thousand registered voters.
We can try to detect absentee or mail-in ballot fraud by comparing the results in bordering precincts that happen to fall on opposite sides of a county line. These precincts will tend to be virtually identical to each other – voters may simply be on the other side of the street from their precinct neighbors.
In 2016, there was no unexplained gap in absentee ballot counts. But 2020 was a different story. Just in Fulton County, Georgia, Lott’s test yielded an unexplained 17,000 votes – 32% more than Biden’s margin over Trump in the entire state.
With the focus on winning the state, there is no apparent reason why Democrats would get out the absentee ballot vote more in one precinct than in a neighboring precinct with similar political and demographic characteristics.
2) Next Lott applied the same method to provisional ballots in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Contrary to state law, voters were allegedly allowed to correct defects in absentee ballots by submitting provisional ballots on Election Day. His analysis found that such permissions in Allegheny County alone contributed to a statistically significant 6,700 additional votes for Biden – in a state decided by fewer than 81,000 votes.
3) Finally, artificially large voter turnouts can also be a sign of vote fraud. This fraud could come in the form of filling out absentee ballots for people who didn’t vote, voting by ineligible people, or bribing people for their votes.
Republican-leaning swing state counties had higher turnouts relative to the 2016 election. Democratic-leaning counties had lower turnouts, except for the Democratic counties with alleged vote fraud, which had very high turnouts.
Lott believes his estimates likely understate the true amount of cheating in these states as he did not attempt to ascertain possible in-person voting fraud. There are numerous allegations of ineligible in-person voters in Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. For example, in Fulton County, Georgia, 2,423 voters were not listed as registered on the state’s records, and 2,560 felons voted even though they had not completed their sentences.
Compared to Europe and other developed countries, America is unique in its lax approach to vote fraud. When all demographic and political groups in the U.S. support voter photo IDs and even 46% of Democrats believe that mail-in voting leads to cheating, ignoring Americans’ concerns won’t make the problem go away.
Read more🗞 Real Clear Politics
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Realclearpolitics
New Peer-Reviewed Research Finds Evidence of 2020 Voter Fraud | RealClearPolitics
By a margin of 52% to 40%, voters believe that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Thats per a Rasmussen Reports...
🔥188👍74❤10🤬6
West Virginia, Kentucky Latest States to Block Zuckbucks In Elections | The Federalist
West Virginia and Kentucky have become the latest states to pass legislation that would restrain local and state election officials from accepting certain gifts and other funds from nongovernmental entities to conduct elections.
In West Virginia, HB 4097 received near-unanimous support in the state legislature, with only one House delegate voting against the bill. Signed by Gov. Jim Justice on Wednesday, the law seeks to prohibit “public officials and bodies responsible for elections in West Virginia from directly receiving or accepting money or anything of value for election administration and related expenses from private parties.”
In Kentucky, state legislators passed a similar law, which mandates that “[a]ll costs and expenses related to election administration shall be paid for with public funds” and that “[a]n employee of a governmental body shall not solicit, take, or otherwise accept any private contribution, donation, or anything of value to assist with election administration within this state.”
The legislation passed by both states would largely bar outside funding from left-wing advocacy groups such as the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), which received upwards of $350 million from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to quietly change state and local election operations during the 2020 election cycle.
As detailed by Federalist Editor in Chief Mollie Hemingway in her New York Times bestselling book, “Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections,” Zuckerberg “didn’t just help Democrats by censoring their political opponents,” his financing of “liberal groups running partisan get-out-the-vote operations” was “the means by which [Democrat] activists achieved their ‘revolution’ and changed the course of the 2020 election.”
“It was a genius plan,” Hemingway writes. “And because no one ever imagined that a coordinated operation could pull off the privatization of the election system, laws were not built to combat it.”
Thirteen states have now passed laws to prevent Zuckerbucks election subversion (AZ, AK, FL, GA, ID, KS, KY, MS, ND, OH, TN, TX, and WV). Another fives states have legislation awaiting a Republican governor’s signature (AL, IN, OK, VA, and SD).
Read more🗞 The Federalist
Related🔎 Election Integrity Progress Report
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
West Virginia and Kentucky have become the latest states to pass legislation that would restrain local and state election officials from accepting certain gifts and other funds from nongovernmental entities to conduct elections.
In West Virginia, HB 4097 received near-unanimous support in the state legislature, with only one House delegate voting against the bill. Signed by Gov. Jim Justice on Wednesday, the law seeks to prohibit “public officials and bodies responsible for elections in West Virginia from directly receiving or accepting money or anything of value for election administration and related expenses from private parties.”
In Kentucky, state legislators passed a similar law, which mandates that “[a]ll costs and expenses related to election administration shall be paid for with public funds” and that “[a]n employee of a governmental body shall not solicit, take, or otherwise accept any private contribution, donation, or anything of value to assist with election administration within this state.”
The legislation passed by both states would largely bar outside funding from left-wing advocacy groups such as the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), which received upwards of $350 million from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to quietly change state and local election operations during the 2020 election cycle.
As detailed by Federalist Editor in Chief Mollie Hemingway in her New York Times bestselling book, “Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections,” Zuckerberg “didn’t just help Democrats by censoring their political opponents,” his financing of “liberal groups running partisan get-out-the-vote operations” was “the means by which [Democrat] activists achieved their ‘revolution’ and changed the course of the 2020 election.”
“It was a genius plan,” Hemingway writes. “And because no one ever imagined that a coordinated operation could pull off the privatization of the election system, laws were not built to combat it.”
Thirteen states have now passed laws to prevent Zuckerbucks election subversion (AZ, AK, FL, GA, ID, KS, KY, MS, ND, OH, TN, TX, and WV). Another fives states have legislation awaiting a Republican governor’s signature (AL, IN, OK, VA, and SD).
Read more🗞 The Federalist
Related🔎 Election Integrity Progress Report
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Federalist
West Virginia, Kentucky Latest States To Block Zuckbucks In Elections
The laws restrain local and state officials from accepting certain gifts and funds from nongovernmental entities to conduct elections.
🔥128👍83❤14👏8
Dave Bossie Teases New Film: ‘Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump’
A new Dave Bossie documentary on the 2020 election scam will premier Tuesday at Mar-a-Lago. The film is focused on Zuckerberg’s nearly half billion dollar election privatization scheme to rig the vote for Joe Biden. Billionaires were not just funding the 2020 election, they were running it, Bossie explained.
“If Zuckerberg doesn’t put his thumb on the scale through this operation, through this funding, Donald Trump wins,” Bossie told the War Room today. In battleground Georgia, the Chan-Zuckerberg initiative spent $45M — 94% of it went to Biden counties — yet basement Joe barely eked out a 12K vote win. In the Zuck-funded Arizona counties, Joe Biden outperformed Hilary Clinton by 700K votes! And yet he only won by 11K votes!
Louisiana AG Jeff Landry currently has the only open case against CTCL, the organization that received the majority ($327M) of the Zuck election bribery bucks. Yesterday, Landry won a case at the appellate court level allowing his investigation to move forward, Bossie reported, emphasizing that more AGs need to follow suit. “This film and this investigation cries out for state and federal investigations,” he said.
Watch 📺 War Room
Read more🗞 Breitbart, The Federalist
Website 💻 Rigged2020.com
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
A new Dave Bossie documentary on the 2020 election scam will premier Tuesday at Mar-a-Lago. The film is focused on Zuckerberg’s nearly half billion dollar election privatization scheme to rig the vote for Joe Biden. Billionaires were not just funding the 2020 election, they were running it, Bossie explained.
“If Zuckerberg doesn’t put his thumb on the scale through this operation, through this funding, Donald Trump wins,” Bossie told the War Room today. In battleground Georgia, the Chan-Zuckerberg initiative spent $45M — 94% of it went to Biden counties — yet basement Joe barely eked out a 12K vote win. In the Zuck-funded Arizona counties, Joe Biden outperformed Hilary Clinton by 700K votes! And yet he only won by 11K votes!
Louisiana AG Jeff Landry currently has the only open case against CTCL, the organization that received the majority ($327M) of the Zuck election bribery bucks. Yesterday, Landry won a case at the appellate court level allowing his investigation to move forward, Bossie reported, emphasizing that more AGs need to follow suit. “This film and this investigation cries out for state and federal investigations,” he said.
Watch 📺 War Room
Read more🗞 Breitbart, The Federalist
Website 💻 Rigged2020.com
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Rumble
Dave Bossie Teases New Film: “Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump”
👍162🔥40👏13❤10