The U.S. ‘Can’t Be Destroyed So Quickly Unless the Enemy Comes From Within’
The President of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, tweeted this response to Bloomberg’s “let them eat lentils” article:
“The most powerful country in the world is falling so fast, that it makes you rethink what are the real reasons.
Something so big and powerful can’t be destroyed so quickly, unless the enemy comes from within.”
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
The President of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, tweeted this response to Bloomberg’s “let them eat lentils” article:
“The most powerful country in the world is falling so fast, that it makes you rethink what are the real reasons.
Something so big and powerful can’t be destroyed so quickly, unless the enemy comes from within.”
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍236🤬56😢15😱3🎉2
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
People Overestimate The US War Machine And Underestimate The US Propaganda Machine
Twitter's algorithm has promoted a Ukrainian news channel called the "The Kyiv Independent", which has allowed it to gain two million followers since it was formed in November 2021 by the European Endowment for Democracy, a spin-off of a CIA-front organization called the National Endowment for Democracy.
The co-founder of NED famously said, "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA".
The channel promotes highly biased content in favor of Zelensky and the western powers that want to escalate the war between Russia and Ukraine to include NATO and U.S. forces.
The outlet is being so loudly amplified by Twitter that one of its reporters (who calls the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion his “brothers in arms“) has gained a million followers since the start of the Russian invasion.
Do you see how sophisticated just that one tiny component of the US-centralized empire‘s propaganda campaign is?
How many seemingly disparate and unrelated elements it has?
Multiple countries, NGOs, an ostensibly independent social media platform, an ostensibly independent news outlet.
Truly, one of the most under-appreciated and overwhelmingly powerful forces on this earth is the US propaganda machine.
The ability to manipulate public thought, not just within the United States but across vast swaths of nations, has allowed it to manufacture international consensus for whatever agendas it wishes to advance in a way that eclipses the collective organizing power of official international bodies like the United Nations.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2022/03/20/people-overestimate-the-us-war-machine-and-underestimate-the-us-propaganda-machine/
@KanekoaTheGreat
Twitter's algorithm has promoted a Ukrainian news channel called the "The Kyiv Independent", which has allowed it to gain two million followers since it was formed in November 2021 by the European Endowment for Democracy, a spin-off of a CIA-front organization called the National Endowment for Democracy.
The co-founder of NED famously said, "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA".
The channel promotes highly biased content in favor of Zelensky and the western powers that want to escalate the war between Russia and Ukraine to include NATO and U.S. forces.
The outlet is being so loudly amplified by Twitter that one of its reporters (who calls the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion his “brothers in arms“) has gained a million followers since the start of the Russian invasion.
Do you see how sophisticated just that one tiny component of the US-centralized empire‘s propaganda campaign is?
How many seemingly disparate and unrelated elements it has?
Multiple countries, NGOs, an ostensibly independent social media platform, an ostensibly independent news outlet.
Truly, one of the most under-appreciated and overwhelmingly powerful forces on this earth is the US propaganda machine.
The ability to manipulate public thought, not just within the United States but across vast swaths of nations, has allowed it to manufacture international consensus for whatever agendas it wishes to advance in a way that eclipses the collective organizing power of official international bodies like the United Nations.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2022/03/20/people-overestimate-the-us-war-machine-and-underestimate-the-us-propaganda-machine/
@KanekoaTheGreat
Caitlin Johnstone
People Overestimate The US War Machine And Underestimate The US Propaganda Machine
Listen to a reading of this article: ❖ If you use Twitter and engage with the subject of the war in Ukraine, you’ve probably noticed a verified account called The Kyiv Independent pop up whil…
👍94🤬42🔥6😱2
Another Senate Subpoena Issued for Arizona 2020 Election Documents
An Arizona Senate committee chair is ordering Maricopa County officials to show up next week on Monday, March 28 and explain why they aren’t providing 2020 election documents demanded by the attorney general.
Senate Government Committee Chair Kelly Townsend, R-Apache Junction, noted it has been several weeks since an assistant to Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich sent a third request for public information to Maricopa County officials. To date, Townsend said, there has been no response.
So Townsend, who has questioned the results of the 2020 election, is using the legislative right of subpoena to tell the supervisors or their representatives to show up Monday “and explain to us why they are not producing the information requested by the attorney general.’’
She made it clear she also wants that information turned over to her and the Republican-controlled committee she chairs.
The Government Committee was also hearing testimony late Monday about whether to make changes in existing election laws, ranging from outlawing unmonitored drop boxes for ballots, to eliminating virtually all early voting in future elections, to requiring ballots be counted by hand.
The subpoena, however, is different.
And it specifically raises questions about how Maricopa County verified the signatures on envelopes for early ballots cast in the 2020 general election and how election workers decided which match and can be counted and which do not.
Source⚠️ State Media Tucson Sun
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
An Arizona Senate committee chair is ordering Maricopa County officials to show up next week on Monday, March 28 and explain why they aren’t providing 2020 election documents demanded by the attorney general.
Senate Government Committee Chair Kelly Townsend, R-Apache Junction, noted it has been several weeks since an assistant to Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich sent a third request for public information to Maricopa County officials. To date, Townsend said, there has been no response.
So Townsend, who has questioned the results of the 2020 election, is using the legislative right of subpoena to tell the supervisors or their representatives to show up Monday “and explain to us why they are not producing the information requested by the attorney general.’’
She made it clear she also wants that information turned over to her and the Republican-controlled committee she chairs.
The Government Committee was also hearing testimony late Monday about whether to make changes in existing election laws, ranging from outlawing unmonitored drop boxes for ballots, to eliminating virtually all early voting in future elections, to requiring ballots be counted by hand.
The subpoena, however, is different.
And it specifically raises questions about how Maricopa County verified the signatures on envelopes for early ballots cast in the 2020 general election and how election workers decided which match and can be counted and which do not.
Source⚠️ State Media Tucson Sun
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Tucson.com
Another Senate subpoena issued for Arizona 2020 election documents
The head of an Arizona Senate committee is ordering Maricopa County officials to show up next week and explain why they aren't providing 2020 election documents demanded by the attorney
👍202🔥52
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tucker Takes the Election Fraud Red Pill: An Oligarch Ran Our Elections
Tucker Carlson spent more than an hour interviewing Special Counsel Mike Gableman about his investigation into the Wisconsin 2020 election.
“You probably thought the government ran elections,” Tucker said after swallowing his giant election fraud red pill. “You didn’t imagine that Mark Zuckerberg, a billionaire, would run our elections. That doesn’t sound like democracy, that sounds like oligarchy. But that’s exactly what happened.”
“There was an ENORMOUS amount of FRAUD. We haven’t spent a lot of time on the 2020 election, but the more you dig into it… you will be shocked,” Tucker concluded.
Watch 📺 Full Interview Fox Nation
Hat tip🤠 @RealKarliBonne
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Tucker Carlson spent more than an hour interviewing Special Counsel Mike Gableman about his investigation into the Wisconsin 2020 election.
“You probably thought the government ran elections,” Tucker said after swallowing his giant election fraud red pill. “You didn’t imagine that Mark Zuckerberg, a billionaire, would run our elections. That doesn’t sound like democracy, that sounds like oligarchy. But that’s exactly what happened.”
“There was an ENORMOUS amount of FRAUD. We haven’t spent a lot of time on the 2020 election, but the more you dig into it… you will be shocked,” Tucker concluded.
Watch 📺 Full Interview Fox Nation
Hat tip🤠 @RealKarliBonne
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍218🔥92👏17❤6🥰4
Joe Biden Underwater with Every Group Except ‘Suburban Women’
New Grinnell-Selzer poll shows some of the worst numbers yet for the “81-million-vote” Biden regime.
Source: Grinell-Selzer Poll, Ryan Girdusky Tweet
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
New Grinnell-Selzer poll shows some of the worst numbers yet for the “81-million-vote” Biden regime.
Source: Grinell-Selzer Poll, Ryan Girdusky Tweet
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍117😁39🤯8👏6❤2🔥1
U.S. Supreme Court Delivers Redistricting Win for Republicans — Decision Could Nuke ‘Cheat Code’ the Left Uses to Retain Power in Urban Areas
The U.S. Supreme Court just sidelined Wisconsin’s highest court and delivered a significant win for Wisconsin Republicans, who were trying to throw out a state legislative map that included a new majority-Black district.
SCOTUS issued a 7-2 decision reversing the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s selection of Governor Tony Evers’s legislative maps. The per curiam decision said, “We agree that the court committed legal error in its application of decisions of this Court regarding the relationship between the constitutional guarantee of equal protection and the VRA.”
The Wisconsin voters represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) joined the Wisconsin Legislature in an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on March 7. The appeal argued the maps submitted by Governor Tony Evers and selected by a majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court are a racial gerrymander that violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantees. The U.S. Constitution makes clear that any government action based on race is subject to strict scrutiny.
Red State explains the significance of the ruling:
“This decision is just the latest step by the Supreme Court to limit the ability of the Voting Rights Act to serve as a partisan tool for Democrats to racially gerrymander for their own political gain. For decades, Democrat officeholders have used the VRA test of proportionality to ensure they retain power in predominately urban areas while ignoring all other factors. The conservatives on the Supreme Court are not keen to let that continue and have been chipping away at such practices for several years now.
In the end, Democrats aren’t freaking out because of the possibility of losing a single, state-level district in Wisconsin. No one, including Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, actually cares about that. Rather, they are freaking out because this decision is much farther reaching and could completely nuke the left’s ‘cheat code’ regarding redistricting in the future.”
Read more🗞 WILL, Talking Points, Red State
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The U.S. Supreme Court just sidelined Wisconsin’s highest court and delivered a significant win for Wisconsin Republicans, who were trying to throw out a state legislative map that included a new majority-Black district.
SCOTUS issued a 7-2 decision reversing the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s selection of Governor Tony Evers’s legislative maps. The per curiam decision said, “We agree that the court committed legal error in its application of decisions of this Court regarding the relationship between the constitutional guarantee of equal protection and the VRA.”
The Wisconsin voters represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) joined the Wisconsin Legislature in an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on March 7. The appeal argued the maps submitted by Governor Tony Evers and selected by a majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court are a racial gerrymander that violates the Constitution’s equal protection guarantees. The U.S. Constitution makes clear that any government action based on race is subject to strict scrutiny.
Red State explains the significance of the ruling:
“This decision is just the latest step by the Supreme Court to limit the ability of the Voting Rights Act to serve as a partisan tool for Democrats to racially gerrymander for their own political gain. For decades, Democrat officeholders have used the VRA test of proportionality to ensure they retain power in predominately urban areas while ignoring all other factors. The conservatives on the Supreme Court are not keen to let that continue and have been chipping away at such practices for several years now.
In the end, Democrats aren’t freaking out because of the possibility of losing a single, state-level district in Wisconsin. No one, including Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, actually cares about that. Rather, they are freaking out because this decision is much farther reaching and could completely nuke the left’s ‘cheat code’ regarding redistricting in the future.”
Read more🗞 WILL, Talking Points, Red State
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Red State
Supreme Court Decision on Redistricting Leaves Democrats Reeling
Wailing and gnashing of teeth have already commenced.
👍263👏47🔥36❤11😁8🤔3🤯2🥰1😢1
Reminder: True the Vote Testifying Before Wisconsin Assembly Committee Tomorrow at 10AM CT
On March 24, 2022 at 10AM, the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections will hold an informational hearing on the following:
2020 Election Investigation – Pursuant to AR -15
Speakers – True the Vote: Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips
Attorney James Bopp
Livestreams 📺
👉 Wis Eye
👉 CannCon Rumble
Background🔎 2,000 Mules
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
On March 24, 2022 at 10AM, the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections will hold an informational hearing on the following:
2020 Election Investigation – Pursuant to AR -15
Speakers – True the Vote: Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips
Attorney James Bopp
Livestreams 📺
👉 Wis Eye
👉 CannCon Rumble
Background🔎 2,000 Mules
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍148👏21❤7🔥6🤔1
Pfizer’s Own Informed Consent Documents Undermine FDA and CDC’s Cries of “Safe and Effective” | ICAN
Pfizer’s own informed consent documents, recently obtained by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), show it discloses potential concerns, including myocarditis, original antigenic sin, and birth defects, while the FDA & CDC whitewash these concerns to declare these products are safe and effective.
ICAN has now obtained the materials used by the Cincinnati’s Children’s Hospital in conducting its studies of the Pfizer booster vaccine, including in children. The documents prepared in consultation with Pfizer tell us a lot about how Pfizer understands the risks of its products.
Pfizer is clearly worried about the risks of myocarditis (heart inflammation) in kids. Pfizer’s own informed consent documents reveal that the risk of myocarditis may be as high as 1 in 1,000 (see page 4).
But the FDA and CDC blithely ignored this risk in approving the Pfizer mRNA shot in kids. Only after rushing this product through the approval process did the CDC begrudgingly admit that “Myocarditis and pericarditis have rarely been reported, especially in adolescents and young adult males within several days after COVID-19 vaccination.”
Pfizer is also aware of the possibility of original antigenic sin and pathogenic priming (unwanted immune responses that leave one worse off in response to a virus than if one had done nothing). Pfizer warns parents of clinical trial participants that “it cannot yet be ruled out that the study vaccine could make a later COVID-19 illness more severe” (emphasis added). The FDA and CDC go to great lengths to hide that information while proclaiming “safe and effective” over and over again like a mantra.
Pfizer appears very worried about the potential of the teratogenesis (harm to a developing fetus) and even possibly mutagenesis (harm to DNA). So even though this is a trial in children, Pfizer disclosed to the parents of these children that “the effects of the COVID-19 vaccine on sperm, a pregnancy, a fetus, or a nursing child are not known.”
But then Pfizer goes even further to state that:
• If your daughter is pregnant, planning to become pregnant or is breast feeding a baby, she cannot be in the study as there may be risks to the unborn baby or nursing baby.Nobody knows what these risks are right now.”
• “If your daughter becomes pregnant, she will have to leave the study.”
• “If your child is a boy, and he thinks he may have gotten a girl pregnant, he or you must tell your child’s study doctor immediately. The study doctor may ask for information about the pregnancy and the birth of the baby. The study doctor may share this information with others who are working on this study.”
• “If your son is taking part in this study, he is not allowed to donate sperm for at least 28 days after his last vaccination.”
Let’s just pause to acknowledge just how deeply unsettling this language is. But it just goes to show that Pfizer wanted to make sure that they had no data at all on pregnancy outcomes.
Given that, the CDC’s recommendation to pregnant women to get vaccinated is scientifically unsound to say the least.
The FDA and CDC have a job to do – evaluate the evidence without bias to keep the public safe. Instead, the FDA and CDC have turned themselves into a marketing department on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry.
Read more🗞 ICAN Decide
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Pfizer’s own informed consent documents, recently obtained by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), show it discloses potential concerns, including myocarditis, original antigenic sin, and birth defects, while the FDA & CDC whitewash these concerns to declare these products are safe and effective.
ICAN has now obtained the materials used by the Cincinnati’s Children’s Hospital in conducting its studies of the Pfizer booster vaccine, including in children. The documents prepared in consultation with Pfizer tell us a lot about how Pfizer understands the risks of its products.
Pfizer is clearly worried about the risks of myocarditis (heart inflammation) in kids. Pfizer’s own informed consent documents reveal that the risk of myocarditis may be as high as 1 in 1,000 (see page 4).
But the FDA and CDC blithely ignored this risk in approving the Pfizer mRNA shot in kids. Only after rushing this product through the approval process did the CDC begrudgingly admit that “Myocarditis and pericarditis have rarely been reported, especially in adolescents and young adult males within several days after COVID-19 vaccination.”
Pfizer is also aware of the possibility of original antigenic sin and pathogenic priming (unwanted immune responses that leave one worse off in response to a virus than if one had done nothing). Pfizer warns parents of clinical trial participants that “it cannot yet be ruled out that the study vaccine could make a later COVID-19 illness more severe” (emphasis added). The FDA and CDC go to great lengths to hide that information while proclaiming “safe and effective” over and over again like a mantra.
Pfizer appears very worried about the potential of the teratogenesis (harm to a developing fetus) and even possibly mutagenesis (harm to DNA). So even though this is a trial in children, Pfizer disclosed to the parents of these children that “the effects of the COVID-19 vaccine on sperm, a pregnancy, a fetus, or a nursing child are not known.”
But then Pfizer goes even further to state that:
• If your daughter is pregnant, planning to become pregnant or is breast feeding a baby, she cannot be in the study as there may be risks to the unborn baby or nursing baby.Nobody knows what these risks are right now.”
• “If your daughter becomes pregnant, she will have to leave the study.”
• “If your child is a boy, and he thinks he may have gotten a girl pregnant, he or you must tell your child’s study doctor immediately. The study doctor may ask for information about the pregnancy and the birth of the baby. The study doctor may share this information with others who are working on this study.”
• “If your son is taking part in this study, he is not allowed to donate sperm for at least 28 days after his last vaccination.”
Let’s just pause to acknowledge just how deeply unsettling this language is. But it just goes to show that Pfizer wanted to make sure that they had no data at all on pregnancy outcomes.
Given that, the CDC’s recommendation to pregnant women to get vaccinated is scientifically unsound to say the least.
The FDA and CDC have a job to do – evaluate the evidence without bias to keep the public safe. Instead, the FDA and CDC have turned themselves into a marketing department on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry.
Read more🗞 ICAN Decide
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network
Pfizer’s Own Informed Consent Documents Undermine FDA and CDC’s Cries of “Safe and Effective” - ICAN - Informed Consent Action…
Pfizer’s own informed consent documents, recently obtained by ICAN, show it discloses potential concerns, including myocarditis, original antigenic sin, and birth defects, while the FDA & CDC whitewash these concerns to declare these products are safe and…
🤬183👍45🔥8🤔7❤2😁2🥰1
What a Surprise: Maricopa County Special Master Router Review Finds… Nothing
The “Special Master” and his hand-picked, 3-person team have released the results of their review of Maricopa County’s routers and Splunk logs. The report found “no routers or managed switches or Splunk logs in the Ballot Tabulation Center (BTC),” and “no evidence of data deletion, data purging, data overwriting, or other destruction of evidence or obstruction of the audit.”
Per the dodgy agreement orchestrated by Arizona Senate President Karen Fann last September, the Arizona audit technical team submitted questions to the Special Master — they were not allowed to be present during the investigation, nor were they allowed to view any of the data directly.
Many of the questions could not be answered due to the length of time that had elapsed. A version of the following answer was given to nearly half of the 5 dozen questions submitted to the Special Master: “Specific data not available for the timeframe scoped. This is a dynamic command and results change over time pending regular maintenance.”
The Special Master’s “expert team” did note that unauthorized access to registration information had occurred before the 2020 election:
“An unauthorized member of the public used a PowerShell script with sequential low egress parameters for harvesting information from the voter registration database. The individual was taking 'screenshots' of voter registration information. County staff remediated to restrict website access and referred case to State Attorney General. Arrest was made December 5th, 2020. Case No. 20-3262MB.”
Read 📑 Special Master Report
Related🔎 Karen Fann BOS Contract
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The “Special Master” and his hand-picked, 3-person team have released the results of their review of Maricopa County’s routers and Splunk logs. The report found “no routers or managed switches or Splunk logs in the Ballot Tabulation Center (BTC),” and “no evidence of data deletion, data purging, data overwriting, or other destruction of evidence or obstruction of the audit.”
Per the dodgy agreement orchestrated by Arizona Senate President Karen Fann last September, the Arizona audit technical team submitted questions to the Special Master — they were not allowed to be present during the investigation, nor were they allowed to view any of the data directly.
Many of the questions could not be answered due to the length of time that had elapsed. A version of the following answer was given to nearly half of the 5 dozen questions submitted to the Special Master: “Specific data not available for the timeframe scoped. This is a dynamic command and results change over time pending regular maintenance.”
The Special Master’s “expert team” did note that unauthorized access to registration information had occurred before the 2020 election:
“An unauthorized member of the public used a PowerShell script with sequential low egress parameters for harvesting information from the voter registration database. The individual was taking 'screenshots' of voter registration information. County staff remediated to restrict website access and referred case to State Attorney General. Arrest was made December 5th, 2020. Case No. 20-3262MB.”
Read 📑 Special Master Report
Related🔎 Karen Fann BOS Contract
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
🤬175👍36😱8🤔1
True the Vote WI Assembly Hearing: An Estimated 138K Ballots Were Trafficked in Wisconsin’s 2020 Election
Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips of True the Vote presented testimony about their investigation into ballot trafficking in Wisconsin’s 2020 election.
“It was not the most secure election ever. It was quite possibly one of the least,” Engelbrecht began.
“We’ve watched the mass mail-out of paper ballots to highly inaccurate voter records,” she continued. “The harried installation of by-mail absentee ballot drop boxes, privately funded by billionaire tech magnates. And the hundreds of legislative changes, lawsuits, consent decrees, all that fundamentally altered election processes. And all of this came together in 2020 under the fog of COVID. It’s hard not to look at the confluence of events and come away with any conclusion other than that it was planned.”
True the Vote “formed a working hypothesis, in part, from informant testimonies across the country,” Engelbrecht explained. “It went something like this: If non-profit groups, being funded by CTCL and others, were going to exploit weaknesses in our election process, then the exploitation would likely involve mail ballots (which are notoriously insecure) and the newly introduced and highly unregulated absentee ballot drop boxes.”
It turns out that WEC did not follow through with its stated commitment to CISA’s guidelines for drop box security. Open records requests confirmed there was no drop box surveillance video available for review in any municipality in Wisconsin except Brown Deer. So True the Vote shifted to commercially available cell phone data.
The group used cutting edge “geofence” technology able to track cell phones to within “a few inches.” To put the sophistication of the technology into perspective, Phillips quoted Georgetown law professor Paul Ohm, who said, “DNA is the only thing harder to anonymize than precise geolocation data.”
True the Vote purchased 10 trillion cell signals in Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Wisconsin, Detroit, Michigan, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
In Wisconsin, the group looked at 1.1 trillion signals (representing 421K unique devices, 20TB of data) between 10/1 and 11/8, a period which encompassed several weeks before early voting began. This allowed True the Vote to build a pre-election “pattern of life” to help identify the ballot trafficking mules.
The team then narrowed down the surveillance to individuals that visited at least 5 NGO offices and 26 drop boxes during the early voting period (a pattern that was contrary to their previous daily activity); 138 people in Milwaukee, Racine, and Green Bay fit that profile. These individuals made 3,568 visits to drop boxes during the 2020 election. Philips noted that 14 of these alleged traffickers also participated in one or more of the violent riots in Wisconsin in 2020.
There are 5 key components to the ballot trafficking hypothesis, Philips summarized: “inaccurate voter rolls, mass mail ballots, NGOs, privately funded drop boxes, and money.”
By “following the money,” Phillips said, True the Vote has uncovered a “nationwide grift around voting” in which not-for-profits orchestrated a paid ballot collection, ballot preparation, and harvested ballot delivery operation.
The group estimates that at least 7% of all mail-in ballots (138K in Wisconsin, 4.8 million nationwide) were trafficked during the 2020 election. “This was an organized crime that was perpetrated on Americans,” Phillips emphasized.
During the Q&A session, Phillips mentioned that while True the Vote has the names of the 5 NGOs, they are unable to release that information due to an active legal investigation.
Engelbrecht concluded by reiterating that ballot drop boxes, mass mail-in ballots, and “dirty voter rolls are the gateway to fraud” in our elections. States must commit to eliminating these sources of fraud, and the penalties for cheating must be severe, she said.
Watch 📺 True the Vote Hearing
Read 📑 True the Vote WI Report
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips of True the Vote presented testimony about their investigation into ballot trafficking in Wisconsin’s 2020 election.
“It was not the most secure election ever. It was quite possibly one of the least,” Engelbrecht began.
“We’ve watched the mass mail-out of paper ballots to highly inaccurate voter records,” she continued. “The harried installation of by-mail absentee ballot drop boxes, privately funded by billionaire tech magnates. And the hundreds of legislative changes, lawsuits, consent decrees, all that fundamentally altered election processes. And all of this came together in 2020 under the fog of COVID. It’s hard not to look at the confluence of events and come away with any conclusion other than that it was planned.”
True the Vote “formed a working hypothesis, in part, from informant testimonies across the country,” Engelbrecht explained. “It went something like this: If non-profit groups, being funded by CTCL and others, were going to exploit weaknesses in our election process, then the exploitation would likely involve mail ballots (which are notoriously insecure) and the newly introduced and highly unregulated absentee ballot drop boxes.”
It turns out that WEC did not follow through with its stated commitment to CISA’s guidelines for drop box security. Open records requests confirmed there was no drop box surveillance video available for review in any municipality in Wisconsin except Brown Deer. So True the Vote shifted to commercially available cell phone data.
The group used cutting edge “geofence” technology able to track cell phones to within “a few inches.” To put the sophistication of the technology into perspective, Phillips quoted Georgetown law professor Paul Ohm, who said, “DNA is the only thing harder to anonymize than precise geolocation data.”
True the Vote purchased 10 trillion cell signals in Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Wisconsin, Detroit, Michigan, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
In Wisconsin, the group looked at 1.1 trillion signals (representing 421K unique devices, 20TB of data) between 10/1 and 11/8, a period which encompassed several weeks before early voting began. This allowed True the Vote to build a pre-election “pattern of life” to help identify the ballot trafficking mules.
The team then narrowed down the surveillance to individuals that visited at least 5 NGO offices and 26 drop boxes during the early voting period (a pattern that was contrary to their previous daily activity); 138 people in Milwaukee, Racine, and Green Bay fit that profile. These individuals made 3,568 visits to drop boxes during the 2020 election. Philips noted that 14 of these alleged traffickers also participated in one or more of the violent riots in Wisconsin in 2020.
There are 5 key components to the ballot trafficking hypothesis, Philips summarized: “inaccurate voter rolls, mass mail ballots, NGOs, privately funded drop boxes, and money.”
By “following the money,” Phillips said, True the Vote has uncovered a “nationwide grift around voting” in which not-for-profits orchestrated a paid ballot collection, ballot preparation, and harvested ballot delivery operation.
The group estimates that at least 7% of all mail-in ballots (138K in Wisconsin, 4.8 million nationwide) were trafficked during the 2020 election. “This was an organized crime that was perpetrated on Americans,” Phillips emphasized.
During the Q&A session, Phillips mentioned that while True the Vote has the names of the 5 NGOs, they are unable to release that information due to an active legal investigation.
Engelbrecht concluded by reiterating that ballot drop boxes, mass mail-in ballots, and “dirty voter rolls are the gateway to fraud” in our elections. States must commit to eliminating these sources of fraud, and the penalties for cheating must be severe, she said.
Watch 📺 True the Vote Hearing
Read 📑 True the Vote WI Report
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Rumble
Campaigns and Elections Hearing WI. True The Vote 3-24-2022
Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections On March 24, 2022, the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections held an informational hearing on the following: 2020 Election Investigation: 2020 Ele
🔥140👍64👏5🤬3❤2🥰2🤔2
Trump Sues Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Every Person Involved with the Russia Hoax: ‘Watergate Pales in Comparison’ | The Blaze
Former President Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and others for purportedly conspiring to overthrow his presidency and cripple his presidential campaign.
What are the details?
The massive 108-page complaint accuses the former secretary of state and Democratic allies — including Clinton campaign aides, former FBI Director James Comey, the Democratic National Convention, and others — of engaging in an "unthinkable plot" to falsely accuse him of colluding with Russia during the 2016 presidential cycle and subsequent election.
A portion of the petition states, "In the run-up to the 2016 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts orchestrated an unthinkable plot – one that shocks the conscience and is an affront to this nation’s democracy. Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty.”
Others named in the suit include former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former Clinton campaign head John Podesta, and former FBI officials Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page.
The Trump suit alleges that Clinton and her Democratic cohorts crafted a falsified link between the former president's campaign and Russia, which ultimately triggered an "unfounded federal investigation" as well as a "media frenzy."
"Under the guise of 'opposition research,' 'data analytics,' and other political stratagems, the Defendants nefariously sought to sway the public's trust," another portion of the lawsuit says. "They worked together with a single, self-serving purpose: to vilify Donald J. Trump."
The suit adds that Clinton and others are guilty of obstructing justice and more, including hacking into the former president's private communications.
“The actions taken in furtherance of their scheme — falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources — are so outrageous, subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison,” the complaint continues.
The suit adds, “When their gambit failed, and Donald J. Trump was elected, the Defendants’ efforts continued unabated, merely shifting their focus to undermining his presidential administration.”
The former president's suit claims that the Defendants' conduct violates the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, making those named in the suit guilty of conspiracy, injurious falsehood, malicious prosecution, computer fraud and abuse, theft of trade secrets, and more.
Trump filed the suit on Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Fort Pierce, where, during his term, he appointed 7 of the 16 current judges. The former president's suit requests a trial by jury and seeks at least $72 million in damages — a sum reported to be legal fees and other associated costs.
“For years, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts attempted to shield themselves from culpability by directing others to do their dirty work for them. This lawsuit seeks to hold all parties accountable for their heinous acts and uphold the principles of our sacred democracy,” Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, told CNBC in an emailed statement on the suit.
Read more🗞 The Blaze, The Federalist, Trump Lawsuit
Hat tip🤠 Adam Carter @TheWashingtonPundit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Former President Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and others for purportedly conspiring to overthrow his presidency and cripple his presidential campaign.
What are the details?
The massive 108-page complaint accuses the former secretary of state and Democratic allies — including Clinton campaign aides, former FBI Director James Comey, the Democratic National Convention, and others — of engaging in an "unthinkable plot" to falsely accuse him of colluding with Russia during the 2016 presidential cycle and subsequent election.
A portion of the petition states, "In the run-up to the 2016 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts orchestrated an unthinkable plot – one that shocks the conscience and is an affront to this nation’s democracy. Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty.”
Others named in the suit include former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former Clinton campaign head John Podesta, and former FBI officials Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page.
The Trump suit alleges that Clinton and her Democratic cohorts crafted a falsified link between the former president's campaign and Russia, which ultimately triggered an "unfounded federal investigation" as well as a "media frenzy."
"Under the guise of 'opposition research,' 'data analytics,' and other political stratagems, the Defendants nefariously sought to sway the public's trust," another portion of the lawsuit says. "They worked together with a single, self-serving purpose: to vilify Donald J. Trump."
The suit adds that Clinton and others are guilty of obstructing justice and more, including hacking into the former president's private communications.
“The actions taken in furtherance of their scheme — falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly-sensitive data sources — are so outrageous, subversive and incendiary that even the events of Watergate pale in comparison,” the complaint continues.
The suit adds, “When their gambit failed, and Donald J. Trump was elected, the Defendants’ efforts continued unabated, merely shifting their focus to undermining his presidential administration.”
The former president's suit claims that the Defendants' conduct violates the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, making those named in the suit guilty of conspiracy, injurious falsehood, malicious prosecution, computer fraud and abuse, theft of trade secrets, and more.
Trump filed the suit on Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Fort Pierce, where, during his term, he appointed 7 of the 16 current judges. The former president's suit requests a trial by jury and seeks at least $72 million in damages — a sum reported to be legal fees and other associated costs.
“For years, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts attempted to shield themselves from culpability by directing others to do their dirty work for them. This lawsuit seeks to hold all parties accountable for their heinous acts and uphold the principles of our sacred democracy,” Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, told CNBC in an emailed statement on the suit.
Read more🗞 The Blaze, The Federalist, Trump Lawsuit
Hat tip🤠 Adam Carter @TheWashingtonPundit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Blaze Media
Donald Trump hits Hillary Clinton, DNC, and more with lawsuit over Russian collusion allegations | Blaze Media
Former President Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and others for purportedly conspiring to overthrow his presidency and cripple his presidential campaign. What are the details?
The massive
108-page…
The massive
108-page…
🔥249👍68❤10👏9😁4
Insights on Trump’s Russia Hoax Lawsuit From The Washington Pundit
The Washington Pundit Assistant Editor Adam Carter made an interesting connection between Trump’s lawsuit against Hilary and the Russia hoax colluders and Alan Dershowitz’s RICO case against Dominion. Referencing a discussion by attorneys Robert Barnes and Viva Frei, Carter writes:
“At the 2:20 min mark, Robert Barnes talks about civil RICO lawsuits and how they differ from criminal RICO cases.
It is useful to listen to understand the lawsuit President Trump filed against Hillary Clinton, the Clinton campaign, FusionGPS, former FBI/DOJ officials, and others for their roles in the Russia Collusion Hoax.”
In a second Telegram post, Carter elaborates:
“Unlike criminal RICO cases, civil RICO lawsuits almost never get past the motion to dismiss. I hate to say it, but the chances of President Trump succeeding in the suit are very low. He probably knows this however and is bringing the case for other reasons.
By filing the lawsuit, Trump is shielding himself from defamation claims. Allegations in legal filings are mostly immune from defamation. It allows him to put out the facts about what happened without fear countersuits being filed in hostile jurisdictions. It also allows Pro-Trump (or honest) media to report on the allegations because reporting on what is contained in legal filings gives journalists immunity from libel. The Mueller team used this tactic ALL THE TIME as did Little Binger in the Rittenhouse trial to relentlessly smear the kid, and allowed hacks like Morning Joe and CNN to just run with it.
Things to watch for:
A. Does Trump survive the motion to dismiss? Clearing that hurdle alone would be a huge win as we've seen in some of the Project Veritas cases.
B. President Trump was very smart to bring the case in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) where he at least has a chance of being assigned an honest, impartial, and fair judge. The defendants will probably attempt to get the case transferred from SDFL to either DC or New York (SDNY). If that happens, it's just a matter of time before it gets dismissed.”
Learn more🗞 Trump’s Russia Hoax RICO Case
@TheWashingtonPundit
—
The Washington Pundit Assistant Editor Adam Carter made an interesting connection between Trump’s lawsuit against Hilary and the Russia hoax colluders and Alan Dershowitz’s RICO case against Dominion. Referencing a discussion by attorneys Robert Barnes and Viva Frei, Carter writes:
“At the 2:20 min mark, Robert Barnes talks about civil RICO lawsuits and how they differ from criminal RICO cases.
It is useful to listen to understand the lawsuit President Trump filed against Hillary Clinton, the Clinton campaign, FusionGPS, former FBI/DOJ officials, and others for their roles in the Russia Collusion Hoax.”
In a second Telegram post, Carter elaborates:
“Unlike criminal RICO cases, civil RICO lawsuits almost never get past the motion to dismiss. I hate to say it, but the chances of President Trump succeeding in the suit are very low. He probably knows this however and is bringing the case for other reasons.
By filing the lawsuit, Trump is shielding himself from defamation claims. Allegations in legal filings are mostly immune from defamation. It allows him to put out the facts about what happened without fear countersuits being filed in hostile jurisdictions. It also allows Pro-Trump (or honest) media to report on the allegations because reporting on what is contained in legal filings gives journalists immunity from libel. The Mueller team used this tactic ALL THE TIME as did Little Binger in the Rittenhouse trial to relentlessly smear the kid, and allowed hacks like Morning Joe and CNN to just run with it.
Things to watch for:
A. Does Trump survive the motion to dismiss? Clearing that hurdle alone would be a huge win as we've seen in some of the Project Veritas cases.
B. President Trump was very smart to bring the case in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) where he at least has a chance of being assigned an honest, impartial, and fair judge. The defendants will probably attempt to get the case transferred from SDFL to either DC or New York (SDNY). If that happens, it's just a matter of time before it gets dismissed.”
Learn more🗞 Trump’s Russia Hoax RICO Case
@TheWashingtonPundit
—
Telegram
The Washington Pundit
Pulled this Viva/Barnes clip about the Alan Dershowitz suit against Dominion for another story I'm working on. At the 2:20 min mark, Robert Barnes talks about civil RICO lawsuits and how they differ from criminal RICO cases.
It is useful to listen to understand…
It is useful to listen to understand…
👍90🔥21❤5
The Reset of the ‘Great Reset’ | Victor Davis Hanson
President Joe Biden believes the Ukraine war will mark the start of a “new world order.” In the middle of the COVID global pandemic, Klaus Schwab and global elites likewise announced a “great reset.”
Accordingly, the nations of the world would have to surrender their sovereignty to an international body of experts. They would enlighten us on taxes, diversity and green policies.
In normal times progressives worry that they do not have public support for their policies. Only in crises do they feel that the political Left and media can merge to use apocalyptic times to ram through usually unpopular approaches to foreign and domestic problems.
We saw that last year: fleeing from Afghanistan, the embrace of critical race theory, trying to end the filibuster, pack the court, junk the Electoral College and nationalize voting laws.
These “new orders” and “resets” always entail far bigger government and more unelected, powerful bureaucracies. Elites assume that their radical changes in energy use, media reporting, voting, sovereignty, and racial and ethnic quotas will never quite apply to themselves, the architects of such top-down changes.
So we common folk must quit fossil fuels, but not those who need to use corporate jets. Walls will not mar our borders but will protect the homes of Nancy Pelosi, Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates.
Hunter Biden’s lost laptop will be declared, by fiat, not news. In contrast, the fake Alfa Bank “collusion” narrative will be national headline news for weeks.
Middle class lifestyles will be curbed as we are instructed to strive for sustainability and transition to apartment living and mass transit. But the Obamas will still keep their three mansions, and Silicon Valley futurists will insist on exemptions for their yachts.
In truth, we are about to see a radical reset – of the current reset. It will be a different sort of transformation than the elites are expecting and one that Biden and the Davos set should greatly fear.
In the November 2022 midterms, we are likely to see a historic “No!” to the orthodox left-wing agenda that has resulted in unsustainable inflation, unaffordable energy, war, and humiliation abroad, spiraling crime, racial hostility – as well as arrogant defiance from those who deliberately enacted these disastrous policies.
The prophets of the new world order sowed the wind and they will soon reap the whirlwind of an angry public worn out by elite incompetence, arrogance, and ignorance.
Read more🗞 Victor Davis Hanson Daily Caller
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
President Joe Biden believes the Ukraine war will mark the start of a “new world order.” In the middle of the COVID global pandemic, Klaus Schwab and global elites likewise announced a “great reset.”
Accordingly, the nations of the world would have to surrender their sovereignty to an international body of experts. They would enlighten us on taxes, diversity and green policies.
In normal times progressives worry that they do not have public support for their policies. Only in crises do they feel that the political Left and media can merge to use apocalyptic times to ram through usually unpopular approaches to foreign and domestic problems.
We saw that last year: fleeing from Afghanistan, the embrace of critical race theory, trying to end the filibuster, pack the court, junk the Electoral College and nationalize voting laws.
These “new orders” and “resets” always entail far bigger government and more unelected, powerful bureaucracies. Elites assume that their radical changes in energy use, media reporting, voting, sovereignty, and racial and ethnic quotas will never quite apply to themselves, the architects of such top-down changes.
So we common folk must quit fossil fuels, but not those who need to use corporate jets. Walls will not mar our borders but will protect the homes of Nancy Pelosi, Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates.
Hunter Biden’s lost laptop will be declared, by fiat, not news. In contrast, the fake Alfa Bank “collusion” narrative will be national headline news for weeks.
Middle class lifestyles will be curbed as we are instructed to strive for sustainability and transition to apartment living and mass transit. But the Obamas will still keep their three mansions, and Silicon Valley futurists will insist on exemptions for their yachts.
In truth, we are about to see a radical reset – of the current reset. It will be a different sort of transformation than the elites are expecting and one that Biden and the Davos set should greatly fear.
In the November 2022 midterms, we are likely to see a historic “No!” to the orthodox left-wing agenda that has resulted in unsustainable inflation, unaffordable energy, war, and humiliation abroad, spiraling crime, racial hostility – as well as arrogant defiance from those who deliberately enacted these disastrous policies.
The prophets of the new world order sowed the wind and they will soon reap the whirlwind of an angry public worn out by elite incompetence, arrogance, and ignorance.
Read more🗞 Victor Davis Hanson Daily Caller
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Daily Caller
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: The Real ‘Reset’ Is Coming
Global Elites will find out in November that regular people will reject their sweeping changes to the social fabric of the West.
🔥240👍101👏19❤15🤬10😢3🥰2🤩2
More Maricopa County Word Games | Patrick Colbeck
The Maricopa County Special Master router and Splunk logs report is remarkable in its lack of details. It appears that they are attempting to play the same word games in this report that are used by vendors to convince election officials that their systems are “air gapped.” The authors of the report appear to be focused upon assuaging the letter of the questions asked as opposed to assuaging the security concerns behind the questions.
The report authors concluded that since there were no BTC routers or managed devices, there was no “public internet” connection and therefore no information worth capturing related to Splunk logs.
Their use of these terms begs a few follow-up questions. For example:
• How do you define “public internet”?
• How do you define “air gapped”? Many technology vendors assert that there is equipment is “air gapped” merely because they use a VPN or firewall. These security measures are still vulnerable to intrusion by interested third parties.
• How did the BTC equipment receive election results from the precincts? Is there verified log data or other evidence which validates this assertion.
• Was the EMS server connected to any other devices? If so, what devices? How were they connected?
• How did the EMS server receive software updates? Who administered these updates and when?
• Were any wireless devices installed on the EMS server? In Mesa County, CO, 36 wireless devices were found connected to the EMS server.
• Were any TCP/IP connections evident for election equipment in the BTC?
• The Dominion D-Suite is installed on a Windows-based platform. Did anyone review Windows logs such as the event log or resource monitor for evidence of TCP/IP connections?
• Was any equipment in the BTC connected to any other equipment in the BTC? If so, how?
• Was any equipment in the BTC connected to equipment in the MCTEC? This equipment does not have to be election equipment. It could be a printer or scanner or even a thermostat as evidenced in Georgia.
• What are the names of the County personnel who continually monitored the access to electronic equipment in the OET?
• How do the authors’ claims reconcile with evidence provided by forensic experts such as Ben Cotton which provided evidence of internet connections?
…and that’s just for starters.
Lead AZ auditor Doug Logan compared AZ Senate President Karen Fann’s Special Master agreement to “playing blind chess.” It was a losing arrangement designed to deliver no meaningful information, Nick Moseder explained in a recent Rumble cast.
“Without receiving answers to the recommended follow-up questions, I do not believe it is reasonable to conclude that there were no connections to the internet – public or private,” Colbeck concludes.
Read more🗞 Patrick Colbeck Let’s Fix Stuff
Watch 📺 Nick Moseder Debunks the Special Master Report
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Maricopa County Special Master router and Splunk logs report is remarkable in its lack of details. It appears that they are attempting to play the same word games in this report that are used by vendors to convince election officials that their systems are “air gapped.” The authors of the report appear to be focused upon assuaging the letter of the questions asked as opposed to assuaging the security concerns behind the questions.
The report authors concluded that since there were no BTC routers or managed devices, there was no “public internet” connection and therefore no information worth capturing related to Splunk logs.
Their use of these terms begs a few follow-up questions. For example:
• How do you define “public internet”?
• How do you define “air gapped”? Many technology vendors assert that there is equipment is “air gapped” merely because they use a VPN or firewall. These security measures are still vulnerable to intrusion by interested third parties.
• How did the BTC equipment receive election results from the precincts? Is there verified log data or other evidence which validates this assertion.
• Was the EMS server connected to any other devices? If so, what devices? How were they connected?
• How did the EMS server receive software updates? Who administered these updates and when?
• Were any wireless devices installed on the EMS server? In Mesa County, CO, 36 wireless devices were found connected to the EMS server.
• Were any TCP/IP connections evident for election equipment in the BTC?
• The Dominion D-Suite is installed on a Windows-based platform. Did anyone review Windows logs such as the event log or resource monitor for evidence of TCP/IP connections?
• Was any equipment in the BTC connected to any other equipment in the BTC? If so, how?
• Was any equipment in the BTC connected to equipment in the MCTEC? This equipment does not have to be election equipment. It could be a printer or scanner or even a thermostat as evidenced in Georgia.
• What are the names of the County personnel who continually monitored the access to electronic equipment in the OET?
• How do the authors’ claims reconcile with evidence provided by forensic experts such as Ben Cotton which provided evidence of internet connections?
…and that’s just for starters.
Lead AZ auditor Doug Logan compared AZ Senate President Karen Fann’s Special Master agreement to “playing blind chess.” It was a losing arrangement designed to deliver no meaningful information, Nick Moseder explained in a recent Rumble cast.
“Without receiving answers to the recommended follow-up questions, I do not believe it is reasonable to conclude that there were no connections to the internet – public or private,” Colbeck concludes.
Read more🗞 Patrick Colbeck Let’s Fix Stuff
Watch 📺 Nick Moseder Debunks the Special Master Report
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍71🔥20🤬8🥰1👏1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Alabama Attorney General Refuses to Agree That Biden Is the ‘Duly Elected’ President
Testifying against Judge Jackson’s SCOTUS nomination, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall (R) repeatedly sidesteps direct questions from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) about whether President Biden is the “duly elected and lawfully serving” president.
Source 👉 The Recount
Longer clip 📺 Now This
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Testifying against Judge Jackson’s SCOTUS nomination, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall (R) repeatedly sidesteps direct questions from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) about whether President Biden is the “duly elected and lawfully serving” president.
Source 👉 The Recount
Longer clip 📺 Now This
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
🔥296👏79👍34❤26🥰10😁9
Election Integrity Progress Report | Wendi Strauch Mahoney UncoverDC
UncoverDC’s Wendi Strauch Mahoney has corralled the major election integrity efforts by state legislatures into an impressive progress report:
• Eight states enacted laws in 2021 and 2022 that impose new or stricter voter ID requirements: AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, MT, TX, and WY.
• Thirteen states put legislation in place to restrict mail-in voting: AL, AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, ID, KS, LA, MT, ND, OK, and TX. Iowa appears to be the only state to restrict early voting so far. Every Democrat opposed it.
• Five states have legislation under consideration that would ban or restrict drop boxes. SC’s H3444 and WI’s S939 have each passed both House and Senate. Drop box related bills have passed the first chamber in GA, AZ, and ID. None have yet been signed into law.
• Five states tightened voter registration laws and requirements: IA, MT, NH, TX, and UT. Arizona’s House and Senate recently passed a law requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote. That bill is heading to Gov. Ducey’s desk for final approval.
• Eighteen states created or expanded legislation regarding “election-related crimes”: AZ, AR, CA, FL, GA, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ND, NV, TX, UT, VA, WA, WV, and WY. In addition, NJ prohibited certain electioneering activities, and HI increased the maximum fine for providing false information to $10K.
• Eleven states have either banned or severely restricted the acceptance and use of private funds for state and local elections: AZ, AK, FL, GA, ID, KS, MS, ND, OH, TN, and TX. Another 5 states have passed anti-Zuckerbucks legislation that is awaiting a Republican governor’s signature: AL, IN, OK, SD and VA.
• Ten states strengthened processes related to “ballot return, verification, and curing” that “restrict voter access”: AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, KS, LA, MT, TX, and UT.
• Two counties have passed resolutions to eliminate voting machines: Nye County, NV and Rio Blanco County, CO. “Just over 3,100 [counties] to go,” Seth Keshel posted.
• Texas and Arizona have been two of the most active states in terms of strengthening election integrity laws. Arkansas, Montana, North Dakota, Georgia, and Florida have also made a good showing.
• Michigan and Pennsylvania have made the least progress - they “stand out as two states that have done very little legislatively to advance public trust in elections through legislation,” Wendi noted.
Read more🗞 Wendi Strauch Mahoney UncoverDC
Related🔎 Election Integrity Scorecard, Twenty-Two States Fight Back Against Zuckerbucks Subversion
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
UncoverDC’s Wendi Strauch Mahoney has corralled the major election integrity efforts by state legislatures into an impressive progress report:
• Eight states enacted laws in 2021 and 2022 that impose new or stricter voter ID requirements: AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, MT, TX, and WY.
• Thirteen states put legislation in place to restrict mail-in voting: AL, AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, ID, KS, LA, MT, ND, OK, and TX. Iowa appears to be the only state to restrict early voting so far. Every Democrat opposed it.
• Five states have legislation under consideration that would ban or restrict drop boxes. SC’s H3444 and WI’s S939 have each passed both House and Senate. Drop box related bills have passed the first chamber in GA, AZ, and ID. None have yet been signed into law.
• Five states tightened voter registration laws and requirements: IA, MT, NH, TX, and UT. Arizona’s House and Senate recently passed a law requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote. That bill is heading to Gov. Ducey’s desk for final approval.
• Eighteen states created or expanded legislation regarding “election-related crimes”: AZ, AR, CA, FL, GA, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ND, NV, TX, UT, VA, WA, WV, and WY. In addition, NJ prohibited certain electioneering activities, and HI increased the maximum fine for providing false information to $10K.
• Eleven states have either banned or severely restricted the acceptance and use of private funds for state and local elections: AZ, AK, FL, GA, ID, KS, MS, ND, OH, TN, and TX. Another 5 states have passed anti-Zuckerbucks legislation that is awaiting a Republican governor’s signature: AL, IN, OK, SD and VA.
• Ten states strengthened processes related to “ballot return, verification, and curing” that “restrict voter access”: AR, AZ, FL, GA, IA, KS, LA, MT, TX, and UT.
• Two counties have passed resolutions to eliminate voting machines: Nye County, NV and Rio Blanco County, CO. “Just over 3,100 [counties] to go,” Seth Keshel posted.
• Texas and Arizona have been two of the most active states in terms of strengthening election integrity laws. Arkansas, Montana, North Dakota, Georgia, and Florida have also made a good showing.
• Michigan and Pennsylvania have made the least progress - they “stand out as two states that have done very little legislatively to advance public trust in elections through legislation,” Wendi noted.
Read more🗞 Wendi Strauch Mahoney UncoverDC
Related🔎 Election Integrity Scorecard, Twenty-Two States Fight Back Against Zuckerbucks Subversion
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
UncoverDC
Election Integrity: Review of Notable State Legislation and Issues
Election integrity has been under scrutiny since the November 2020 general election, and many state legislatures have made attempts to beef up legislation to ensure greater confidence in future elections. Significant areas of focus for election integrity…
👍123👏14🔥12❤8🥰2🎉1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trump’s Russia Hoax RICO Case Scheduled to Be Heard by a Clinton-Appointed Judge: ‘How Do You Think That’s Going to Go?’
“Donald Trump’s 108 page lawsuit will be heard by U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks, who was appointed by Bill Clinton and in 2015, and threw out the civil racketeering suit filed against Hillary Clinton dealing with her private email server.
I wonder what will happen 🤦🏼♂️
At least Trump is calling on the judge to recuse himself from the case for these very reasons,” Nick Moseder posted on Telegram tonight.
Learn more🔎 Trump’s RICO Case
Sources 👉 @Behizy, @WILFMoseder
“Donald Trump’s 108 page lawsuit will be heard by U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks, who was appointed by Bill Clinton and in 2015, and threw out the civil racketeering suit filed against Hillary Clinton dealing with her private email server.
I wonder what will happen 🤦🏼♂️
At least Trump is calling on the judge to recuse himself from the case for these very reasons,” Nick Moseder posted on Telegram tonight.
Learn more🔎 Trump’s RICO Case
Sources 👉 @Behizy, @WILFMoseder
👍186🔥40😁12👏6😢5🤬2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Gaffe Machine Just Moved Us Closer to World War III
“Never underestimate Joe Biden’s ability to f*ck things up,” Obama famously said of his then-VP.
On a trip to the Ukrainian border this weekend, Joe Biden lost no time living up to that low standard, telling an audience in Poland, “For God’s sake, this man [Putin] cannot remain in power.”
Richard Haass, the Council on Foreign Relations president, tweeted his concerns that Biden had “just expanded US war aims, calling for regime change,” the Daily Mail reported.
“It is not within our power to accomplish - plus runs risk it will increase Putin's inclination to see this as a fight to the finish, raising odds he will reject compromise, escalate, or both,” wrote Haass.
Read more🗞 Daily Mail
Video via Wittgenstein
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
“Never underestimate Joe Biden’s ability to f*ck things up,” Obama famously said of his then-VP.
On a trip to the Ukrainian border this weekend, Joe Biden lost no time living up to that low standard, telling an audience in Poland, “For God’s sake, this man [Putin] cannot remain in power.”
Richard Haass, the Council on Foreign Relations president, tweeted his concerns that Biden had “just expanded US war aims, calling for regime change,” the Daily Mail reported.
“It is not within our power to accomplish - plus runs risk it will increase Putin's inclination to see this as a fight to the finish, raising odds he will reject compromise, escalate, or both,” wrote Haass.
Read more🗞 Daily Mail
Video via Wittgenstein
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
🤬93👍30😁6😢2
‘Clean Up on Aisle Joe’
“Joe Biden is now the most dangerous man in the world.”
- Nigel Farage
The White House immediately shifted to damage control after Biden called for regime change in Russia, stating that the Commander in Thief’s “comments are not official US policy,” and later back-pedaling:
“The President's point was that Putin cannot be allowed to exercise power over his neighbors or the region. He was not discussing Putin's power in Russia, or regime change,” a White House circus ring official said.
Sources: Nigel Farage tweet 1 (modified), tweet 2, Jacqui Heinrich, Daily Mail
Hat tip🤠 @RealKarliBonne
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
“Joe Biden is now the most dangerous man in the world.”
- Nigel Farage
The White House immediately shifted to damage control after Biden called for regime change in Russia, stating that the Commander in Thief’s “comments are not official US policy,” and later back-pedaling:
“The President's point was that Putin cannot be allowed to exercise power over his neighbors or the region. He was not discussing Putin's power in Russia, or regime change,” a White House circus ring official said.
Sources: Nigel Farage tweet 1 (modified), tweet 2, Jacqui Heinrich, Daily Mail
Hat tip🤠 @RealKarliBonne
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍94😁55🔥12🤯7
Russia Regime Change Always the Plan?
Jack Posobiec believes dethroning Putin may have always been part of the New World Order oligarchs’ plan. On Saturday, he tweeted:
“The regime’s goal was to use Ukraine as a launching pad for regime change operations against Russia.
This was always the plan, only you don’t usually hear the president openly admitting it.”
Posobiec pointed out that the “Director of the CIA straight up admitted the agenda publicly” back in October 2020:
“Imagine prospects for world peace, prosperity, & security if Joe Biden were President of the United States & Alexei Navalny the President of Russia. We’ll soon be halfway there,” John Brennan tweeted.
Responding to Posobiec, David Avocado Wolfe commented:
“The CIA believes they are invincible now. They’ve gotten away with 70+ years of toppling regime after regime including the Trump Presidency. Is Putin going to end their winning streak?”
Sources: Brennan, Posobiec tweet1, tweet2
Related🔎 Putin Trashes WEF
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Jack Posobiec believes dethroning Putin may have always been part of the New World Order oligarchs’ plan. On Saturday, he tweeted:
“The regime’s goal was to use Ukraine as a launching pad for regime change operations against Russia.
This was always the plan, only you don’t usually hear the president openly admitting it.”
Posobiec pointed out that the “Director of the CIA straight up admitted the agenda publicly” back in October 2020:
“Imagine prospects for world peace, prosperity, & security if Joe Biden were President of the United States & Alexei Navalny the President of Russia. We’ll soon be halfway there,” John Brennan tweeted.
Responding to Posobiec, David Avocado Wolfe commented:
“The CIA believes they are invincible now. They’ve gotten away with 70+ years of toppling regime after regime including the Trump Presidency. Is Putin going to end their winning streak?”
Sources: Brennan, Posobiec tweet1, tweet2
Related🔎 Putin Trashes WEF
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
🔥146🤬42👍40