Trump-Endorsed Candidates on Fire in Texas Primaries
Every candidate endorsed by former President Donald Trump in Texas’s Republican primaries have either won or are substantially leading their races as of 11PM ET, potentially solidifying Trump’s kingmaker status in the first primaries of 2022.
The 45th president gave his stamp of approval — a much coveted prize among Republican hopefuls — to 33 candidates. Polling out of Texas has already shown that GOP voters are more likely to support candidates who have passed Trump’s muster.
The former president released a statement celebrating his late night victory:
Big night in Texas! All 33 candidates that were Trump endorsed have either won their primary election or are substantially leading in the case of a runoff. Governor Abbott and Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick have won in a landslide. Thank you, and congratulations to all!
Trump’s endorsement secured the nomination of incumbent Gov. Greg Abbott (R), who faced fierce primary opposition from former State Sen. Don Huffines and former State Party Chairman Allen West. He also lifted two of House Republicans’ top recruits to the nomination without a runoff: Monica De La Cruz and Wesley Hunt, who are both at 56 percent with well over half the votes counted.
However, incumbent Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton is expected by CNN to proceed to a runoff election.
Paxton must receive more than 50% of the vote in order to avoid the runoff election scheduled in May.
The Republican AG has 42% of votes with just of half of all precints in around 10:30 PM local time, Politico reported. George P. Bush, child of former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, is second to Paxton with 22%.
Nearly 1.2M voters (1,196,243) showed up for the Republican primary in Texas versus 648,049 Dem voters.
Read more🗞 Breitbart, Just the News
Learn more🔦🧵 TX Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Every candidate endorsed by former President Donald Trump in Texas’s Republican primaries have either won or are substantially leading their races as of 11PM ET, potentially solidifying Trump’s kingmaker status in the first primaries of 2022.
The 45th president gave his stamp of approval — a much coveted prize among Republican hopefuls — to 33 candidates. Polling out of Texas has already shown that GOP voters are more likely to support candidates who have passed Trump’s muster.
The former president released a statement celebrating his late night victory:
Big night in Texas! All 33 candidates that were Trump endorsed have either won their primary election or are substantially leading in the case of a runoff. Governor Abbott and Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick have won in a landslide. Thank you, and congratulations to all!
Trump’s endorsement secured the nomination of incumbent Gov. Greg Abbott (R), who faced fierce primary opposition from former State Sen. Don Huffines and former State Party Chairman Allen West. He also lifted two of House Republicans’ top recruits to the nomination without a runoff: Monica De La Cruz and Wesley Hunt, who are both at 56 percent with well over half the votes counted.
However, incumbent Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton is expected by CNN to proceed to a runoff election.
Paxton must receive more than 50% of the vote in order to avoid the runoff election scheduled in May.
The Republican AG has 42% of votes with just of half of all precints in around 10:30 PM local time, Politico reported. George P. Bush, child of former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, is second to Paxton with 22%.
Nearly 1.2M voters (1,196,243) showed up for the Republican primary in Texas versus 648,049 Dem voters.
Read more🗞 Breitbart, Just the News
Learn more🔦🧵 TX Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Breitbart
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Wins Republican Primary in Landslide Victory
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), who was endorsed by former President Donald Trump, won the Lone Star State's Republican Primary.
👍97❤14🤔8😢6🤬5🎉4🔥3
Georgia Elections Chief Vows to 'Follow the Money' in Harvesting Probe, Prosecute if Warranted | Just the News | Just the News
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger sought to dispel whispers in conservative circles that he is slow-walking the probe he announced in January, explaining to Just the News that the only delays are related to administrative changes on the State Elections Board. That panel possesses the power to issue subpoenas Raffensperger says his investigators need to solve the case.
"Right now we're waiting for the State Election Board to pick their new chair, so that we can ask for a subpoena," he told the "Just the News" television show Tuesday night on Real America's Voice.
Raffensperger says his investigative team wants to use the subpoena to secure the identity of a John Doe witness/whistleblower who told the election watchdog group True the Vote last year that he was paid thousands of dollars to collect third-party ballots during Georgia's November 2020 general election and Jan. 5, 2021 runoff election that gave Democrats control of the U.S. Senate.
"We outlawed ballot harvesting as soon as I took office," Raffensperger said. "We think that's a serious violation of state law. The only person that should touch your ballot ever is you, the voter, or the election official when they receive your absentee ballot.
"So we're going to do a thorough investigation, but we need to get a subpoena for the fella who this John Doe is. Was he paid? How much was he paid? And then who paid him. And we're going to follow the money, and we're gonna get to the bottom of it. And we're gonna prosecute this, if we find that there's substance to it."
Read more🗞 Just the News
Related🔎 2,000 Ballot Trafficking Mules, Ballot Trafficking Whistleblower Comes Forward in Georgia
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger sought to dispel whispers in conservative circles that he is slow-walking the probe he announced in January, explaining to Just the News that the only delays are related to administrative changes on the State Elections Board. That panel possesses the power to issue subpoenas Raffensperger says his investigators need to solve the case.
"Right now we're waiting for the State Election Board to pick their new chair, so that we can ask for a subpoena," he told the "Just the News" television show Tuesday night on Real America's Voice.
Raffensperger says his investigative team wants to use the subpoena to secure the identity of a John Doe witness/whistleblower who told the election watchdog group True the Vote last year that he was paid thousands of dollars to collect third-party ballots during Georgia's November 2020 general election and Jan. 5, 2021 runoff election that gave Democrats control of the U.S. Senate.
"We outlawed ballot harvesting as soon as I took office," Raffensperger said. "We think that's a serious violation of state law. The only person that should touch your ballot ever is you, the voter, or the election official when they receive your absentee ballot.
"So we're going to do a thorough investigation, but we need to get a subpoena for the fella who this John Doe is. Was he paid? How much was he paid? And then who paid him. And we're going to follow the money, and we're gonna get to the bottom of it. And we're gonna prosecute this, if we find that there's substance to it."
Read more🗞 Just the News
Related🔎 2,000 Ballot Trafficking Mules, Ballot Trafficking Whistleblower Comes Forward in Georgia
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Just The News
Georgia elections chief vows to 'follow the money' in harvesting probe, prosecute if warranted
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger says next step is to get State Elections Board to issue subpoena targeting whistleblower who claims he was paid to illegally collect ballots.
👍75🤬48❤9🤔8👏2
Captain Keshel on the Texas Primaries
“Texas Primaries, a brief postlude:
Very few of the candidates I backed won. Steve Toth won, and so did Julie Clark for GOP Chair in Medina County.
I don’t regret backing candidates who didn’t win - Toth was the only incumbent I endorsed. We have a state run by the GOP now for 2 decades in the chambers and 3 in the mansion, yet a sinking feeling of despair about being taken over. There are few Dems to blame for that.
The governor has fumbled COVID, elections, and the border. He is indeed popular with moderates and suburban voters. People are generally not political and often back the ones they know rather than the uncertain. I don’t agree with this.
Alas, I have at this point no claims of foul play, but I maintain that all states should have closed primary systems and register voters by party. Too many close races can be decided by organized rings of one party’s voters lining up to vote in the other party’s primaries.
I am utterly astounded not only that there were no high profile upsets, but that most challenges were beat back by landslide margins. Still, I don’t regret being anti-incumbent and consider it insanity to return the same people to office over and over.
Congrats to those who ran against a powerful political establishment, win, lose, or draw.”
- https://t.iss.one/RealSKeshel/3767
Telegram 💬 @RealSKeshel
Related🔎 Trump Candidates Win Texas Primaries
Learn more🔦🧵 TX Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
“Texas Primaries, a brief postlude:
Very few of the candidates I backed won. Steve Toth won, and so did Julie Clark for GOP Chair in Medina County.
I don’t regret backing candidates who didn’t win - Toth was the only incumbent I endorsed. We have a state run by the GOP now for 2 decades in the chambers and 3 in the mansion, yet a sinking feeling of despair about being taken over. There are few Dems to blame for that.
The governor has fumbled COVID, elections, and the border. He is indeed popular with moderates and suburban voters. People are generally not political and often back the ones they know rather than the uncertain. I don’t agree with this.
Alas, I have at this point no claims of foul play, but I maintain that all states should have closed primary systems and register voters by party. Too many close races can be decided by organized rings of one party’s voters lining up to vote in the other party’s primaries.
I am utterly astounded not only that there were no high profile upsets, but that most challenges were beat back by landslide margins. Still, I don’t regret being anti-incumbent and consider it insanity to return the same people to office over and over.
Congrats to those who ran against a powerful political establishment, win, lose, or draw.”
- https://t.iss.one/RealSKeshel/3767
Telegram 💬 @RealSKeshel
Related🔎 Trump Candidates Win Texas Primaries
Learn more🔦🧵 TX Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Telegram
Seth Keshel - "Captain K"
Texas Primaries, a brief postlude:
Very few of the candidates I backed won. Steve Toth won, and so did Julie Clark for GOP Chair in Medina County.
I don’t regret backing candidates who didn’t win - Toth was the only incumbent I endorsed. We have a state…
Very few of the candidates I backed won. Steve Toth won, and so did Julie Clark for GOP Chair in Medina County.
I don’t regret backing candidates who didn’t win - Toth was the only incumbent I endorsed. We have a state…
👍85❤12👏5😁2
Gableman Report Lays Out the Case for Decertification of the 2020 Wisconsin Election
“Certification of electors in a state is a quintessentially political act, delegated by the United States Constitution to state legislatures, which may voluntarily adopt revocable and defeasible rules to guide the process. Wisconsin election law does not explicitly authorize the decertification of electors. But neither does it prohibit it. For this reason, the U.S. Constitution and the gap-filling common law against which backdrop the federal and Wisconsin Constitutions were adopted provide the ultimate guidance. And under those two documents, it is clear that the Wisconsin Legislature could lawfully take steps to decertify electors in any Presidential election, for example in light of violations of state election law that did or likely could have affected the outcome of the election. Furthermore, notwithstanding the current debate over amending the federal Electoral Count Act, the supreme responsibility for running state elections in Wisconsin is vested in our state Legislature — not any other state instrumentality, and not the federal government.
The U.S. Constitution provides in relevant respect that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress ....” U.S. Const., art. II., § 1, cl. 2. This is a direct delegation to each state legislature. It is not a delegation to the Wisconsin Governor (or WEC) and its Legislature. The Framers knew how to delegate to, respectively, state legislatures or state executives, or to both acting concurrently. Compare, e.g., id. with id. at art. IV, § 4 (“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”) and id. at XVII amend. (“When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.”)
The direct constitutional delegation to state legislatures here operates as a “plenary” power. See McPherson v. Blecker, 146 U.S. 1, 35 (1892); see also Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 104 (2000) (“The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors.”). Pursuant to that plenary power, it is true that after 1824 most state legislatures began to delegate, in effect, their plenary power to a process of popular selection of the presidential electors carried out under a suite of state law provisions. Yet, as applied here, these delegations and self-imposed statutory processes by the Wisconsin legislature are not irrevocable. An election of presidential electors that violates Wisconsin (or any other state legislature’s relevant laws) is both void and voidable.
This Report has documented not just one, but a great collection of Wisconsin election law violations. As a political matter, the actions of state actors certifying electors in any Presidential election can be reconsidered as the Wisconsin Legislature sees fit using its plenary power under Article II of the federal Constitution, as recognized in McPherson and Bush v. Gore. Indeed, McPherson noted that “there is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time.” McPherson, 146 U.S. at 35…
However, this action would not, on its own, have any other legal consequence under state or federal law. It would not, for example, change who the current President is.”
Read 📑 Gableman Second Interim Report
Watch 📺 WI Hearing CannCon Rumble
Source🤠@IvanRaiklin
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
“Certification of electors in a state is a quintessentially political act, delegated by the United States Constitution to state legislatures, which may voluntarily adopt revocable and defeasible rules to guide the process. Wisconsin election law does not explicitly authorize the decertification of electors. But neither does it prohibit it. For this reason, the U.S. Constitution and the gap-filling common law against which backdrop the federal and Wisconsin Constitutions were adopted provide the ultimate guidance. And under those two documents, it is clear that the Wisconsin Legislature could lawfully take steps to decertify electors in any Presidential election, for example in light of violations of state election law that did or likely could have affected the outcome of the election. Furthermore, notwithstanding the current debate over amending the federal Electoral Count Act, the supreme responsibility for running state elections in Wisconsin is vested in our state Legislature — not any other state instrumentality, and not the federal government.
The U.S. Constitution provides in relevant respect that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress ....” U.S. Const., art. II., § 1, cl. 2. This is a direct delegation to each state legislature. It is not a delegation to the Wisconsin Governor (or WEC) and its Legislature. The Framers knew how to delegate to, respectively, state legislatures or state executives, or to both acting concurrently. Compare, e.g., id. with id. at art. IV, § 4 (“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”) and id. at XVII amend. (“When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.”)
The direct constitutional delegation to state legislatures here operates as a “plenary” power. See McPherson v. Blecker, 146 U.S. 1, 35 (1892); see also Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 104 (2000) (“The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors.”). Pursuant to that plenary power, it is true that after 1824 most state legislatures began to delegate, in effect, their plenary power to a process of popular selection of the presidential electors carried out under a suite of state law provisions. Yet, as applied here, these delegations and self-imposed statutory processes by the Wisconsin legislature are not irrevocable. An election of presidential electors that violates Wisconsin (or any other state legislature’s relevant laws) is both void and voidable.
This Report has documented not just one, but a great collection of Wisconsin election law violations. As a political matter, the actions of state actors certifying electors in any Presidential election can be reconsidered as the Wisconsin Legislature sees fit using its plenary power under Article II of the federal Constitution, as recognized in McPherson and Bush v. Gore. Indeed, McPherson noted that “there is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time.” McPherson, 146 U.S. at 35…
However, this action would not, on its own, have any other legal consequence under state or federal law. It would not, for example, change who the current President is.”
Read 📑 Gableman Second Interim Report
Watch 📺 WI Hearing CannCon Rumble
Source🤠@IvanRaiklin
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
🔥68👍42👏6❤1
FDA Releases Second Round of Pfizer Documents After Fighting to Keep Them Sealed Until 2097
The FDA just released round two (55,000 pages) of Pfizer clinical trial documents thanks to a court order obtained by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.
Read 📑 FDA Pfizer Documents
Source🤠 Aaron Kheriaty, Hans Mahncke
Related🔎 Court Rejects FDA Request to Hide Pfizer Vax Data for 75 Years
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
The FDA just released round two (55,000 pages) of Pfizer clinical trial documents thanks to a court order obtained by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.
Read 📑 FDA Pfizer Documents
Source🤠 Aaron Kheriaty, Hans Mahncke
Related🔎 Court Rejects FDA Request to Hide Pfizer Vax Data for 75 Years
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
🔥115👍33🤩5❤1
German Insurance Group Fires Executive Who Warned of the High Vaccine Side-Effect Rate Revealed by Billing Data | Eugyppius
His termination appears timed to prevent his participation in a meeting with German vaccine regulators.
Two weeks ago, BKK ProVita chairman Andreas Schöfbeck caused a small uproar by writing to Germany’s vaccine regulator, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, to inquire about the high rate of vaccine side-effects evident from BKK billing data. Schöfbeck has now been fired following an hours-long company meeting this morning, at which he was called upon to defend his letter.
Representatives from the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, including its president, Klaus Cichutek, had agreed to meet with Schöfbeck and other BKK officials about their concerns this afternoon. Schöfbeck’s termination was obviously timed to prevent his participation at that meeting, which will now go forward without him.
This is the behaviour of people who have deep confidence in the safety and effectiveness of our Corona vaccines.
Read more🗞 Eugyppius
Related🔎 German Insurance Executive Warns That Vax Side Effects Are Being Underreported
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
His termination appears timed to prevent his participation in a meeting with German vaccine regulators.
Two weeks ago, BKK ProVita chairman Andreas Schöfbeck caused a small uproar by writing to Germany’s vaccine regulator, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, to inquire about the high rate of vaccine side-effects evident from BKK billing data. Schöfbeck has now been fired following an hours-long company meeting this morning, at which he was called upon to defend his letter.
Representatives from the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, including its president, Klaus Cichutek, had agreed to meet with Schöfbeck and other BKK officials about their concerns this afternoon. Schöfbeck’s termination was obviously timed to prevent his participation at that meeting, which will now go forward without him.
This is the behaviour of people who have deep confidence in the safety and effectiveness of our Corona vaccines.
Read more🗞 Eugyppius
Related🔎 German Insurance Executive Warns That Vax Side Effects Are Being Underreported
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Eugyppius
Andreas Schöfbeck, German insurance executive who warned of the high vaccine side-effect rate revealed by billing data, has been…
His termination appears timed to prevent his participation in a meeting today with German vaccine regulators
🤬143👍25🔥22🤔10
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
HHS-Funded Lazarus Study Showed That Vaccine Adverse Events Are Underreported by 99%
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explains that although there have been more deaths from the Covid vaccines “in the last 8 months than all of the deaths from all of the vaccines combined over the last 30 years,” there is an “epidemic” of underreporting vaccine injuries:
“The VAERS system doesn’t work... It is designed to undercount injuries by as much as 99%. Why do I say that? Because HHS did a study on the system in 2010… It’s called ‘Lazarus et al.’… What they found was that vaccine injuries… were happening in about 1 out of every 40 people per vaccine and that… fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are reported…
When CDC saw the results, the frightening alarming results, they killed the study and refused to answer the phone calls of Lazarus and his team…The CDC stopped talking to its fellow agency because it didn’t like the news.”
Read 📑 Lazarus Report
Source 🦊 @VigilantFox | Rumble
Hat tip🤠 @Brian_L_RAS
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explains that although there have been more deaths from the Covid vaccines “in the last 8 months than all of the deaths from all of the vaccines combined over the last 30 years,” there is an “epidemic” of underreporting vaccine injuries:
“The VAERS system doesn’t work... It is designed to undercount injuries by as much as 99%. Why do I say that? Because HHS did a study on the system in 2010… It’s called ‘Lazarus et al.’… What they found was that vaccine injuries… were happening in about 1 out of every 40 people per vaccine and that… fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are reported…
When CDC saw the results, the frightening alarming results, they killed the study and refused to answer the phone calls of Lazarus and his team…The CDC stopped talking to its fellow agency because it didn’t like the news.”
Read 📑 Lazarus Report
Source 🦊 @VigilantFox | Rumble
Hat tip🤠 @Brian_L_RAS
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
🤬104🔥66👍27❤3😢2
Memorable Moments in Biden’s Slur of the Union
"Putin will never gain the hearts and souls of the *Iranian* people."
"A pound of Ukrainian people, the pounds. The proud, pound people, pound for pound, ready to fight with every inch of earnagy they have!"
"What used to be called the rush belt became the home of sig and...significant manufacture...(loud applause)."
"We stand shoulder to, to legs with the, the Ur, the Uranium people."
“You can’t build a wall high enough to keep out the vaccine.”
Biden inexplicably concluded his speech with the phrase “Go git ‘im” although it was not in his prepared text and it was unclear who he wanted the Congress to “git.”
Not even Dems could stomach the dementia cheif’s major malfunction. @Maximus_4EVR noted:
• Only 41% of viewers found Biden's speech positive, per CNN. The lowest in CNN history for a SOTU poll.
• Here's the kicker... The poll had a 50% Dem skew (mostly Dems watched it). 😂
• This suggests Biden lost more *Dem* support last night.
• We know he has been hemorrhaging Dem support for months, his overall approval *before* the SOTU was in the 30s and you can't be that low without a loss of Dems.”
Read more🗞 Breitbart, Western Journal
Hat tip 🤠 @Maximus_4EVR
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
"Putin will never gain the hearts and souls of the *Iranian* people."
"A pound of Ukrainian people, the pounds. The proud, pound people, pound for pound, ready to fight with every inch of earnagy they have!"
"What used to be called the rush belt became the home of sig and...significant manufacture...(loud applause)."
"We stand shoulder to, to legs with the, the Ur, the Uranium people."
“You can’t build a wall high enough to keep out the vaccine.”
Biden inexplicably concluded his speech with the phrase “Go git ‘im” although it was not in his prepared text and it was unclear who he wanted the Congress to “git.”
Not even Dems could stomach the dementia cheif’s major malfunction. @Maximus_4EVR noted:
• Only 41% of viewers found Biden's speech positive, per CNN. The lowest in CNN history for a SOTU poll.
• Here's the kicker... The poll had a 50% Dem skew (mostly Dems watched it). 😂
• This suggests Biden lost more *Dem* support last night.
• We know he has been hemorrhaging Dem support for months, his overall approval *before* the SOTU was in the 30s and you can't be that low without a loss of Dems.”
Read more🗞 Breitbart, Western Journal
Hat tip 🤠 @Maximus_4EVR
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Breitbart
'A Pound of Ukrainian People'? 9 Brain Freezes in Joe Biden's SOTU Delivery
President Joe Biden stumbled through his State of the Union address on Tuesday, flubbing several lines from his prepared text.
😁103👍35🤬18😱3🔥1🥰1
Biden Announces Increased Spending on Smergberd, Rustamufferns, Blabtrussels | Babylon Bee Satire 🐝
Addressing lawmakers from both sides of the aisle, President Joe Biden began his State of the Union speech by announcing a bold plan to increase spending on Smergberd, Rustamufferns, and Blabtrussels.
“Not only will we fight inflation by increasing government spending on these invaluable potumpalumps,” said the President, passionately teetering to one side, “but we will also make sure every man, woman, and chargafar receives quality, affordable sploogle.”
Read 🐝 Babylon Bee Satire News
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Addressing lawmakers from both sides of the aisle, President Joe Biden began his State of the Union speech by announcing a bold plan to increase spending on Smergberd, Rustamufferns, and Blabtrussels.
“Not only will we fight inflation by increasing government spending on these invaluable potumpalumps,” said the President, passionately teetering to one side, “but we will also make sure every man, woman, and chargafar receives quality, affordable sploogle.”
Read 🐝 Babylon Bee Satire News
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Babylon Bee
Biden Announces Increased Spending On Smergberd, Rustamufferns, Blabtrussels
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Addressing lawmakers from both sides of the aisle, President Joe Biden began his State of the Union speech by announcing a bold plan to increase spending on Smergberd, Rustamufferns, and Blabtrussels.
😁133👍26🤯9
Pfizer's Latest Data Release: Study Found mRNA Moves From Injection Site to Organs Throughout the Body | Naked Emperor Substack
An initial look at lipid nanoparticles around the body.
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are used to deliver fragile mRNA strands into cells. They are tiny balls of fat which protect the mRNA from being destroyed and allow it to enter cells undetected. Toxicity of LNPs has always been a concern but I am not expert enough to comment on whether they are or are not toxic in the Pfizer vaccine.
From early on in the vaccination programme, fact-checkers assured us that mRNA “is likely to stay right in the arm where it’s injected and get taken up by the cells there.” We know this is not correct and these latest documents confirm that.
This document - a Nonclinical Overview and this Pharmacokinetics Written Summary looked at the distribution of LNPs in the blood, plasma and selected tissues of Wistar Han rats, over 48 hours after a single injection. The full results can be seen here.
As you can see, the LNPs were present in all the organs tested. As would be expected, the injection site had the highest levels which started declining after 4 hours. At 48 hours the highest concentration of LNPs were at the injection site and represented almost 25% of the administered dose.
However, there were high concentrations of LNPs in other organs, just not as high as at the injection site. The next highest was in the liver with over 16% of the administered dose in that organ at 48 hours. High concentrations were also seen in adrenal glands, spleen, bone marrow and ovaries.
What is concerning about this is that by 48 hours the concentration of LNPs was falling in the injection site but still rising in the other organs listed above. It was also still rising in many other organs where the concentration was much lower.
What happened after 48 hours? How much did the concentration of LNPs rise in the other organs and for how long? Why did the study finish at 48 hours or not get extended after it was obvious the levels were still climbing?
Read🗞 Naked Emperor Substack, Nonclinical Overview, Pharmacokinetics Written Summary, Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary
Related🔎 Pfizer Documents - March Release
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
An initial look at lipid nanoparticles around the body.
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are used to deliver fragile mRNA strands into cells. They are tiny balls of fat which protect the mRNA from being destroyed and allow it to enter cells undetected. Toxicity of LNPs has always been a concern but I am not expert enough to comment on whether they are or are not toxic in the Pfizer vaccine.
From early on in the vaccination programme, fact-checkers assured us that mRNA “is likely to stay right in the arm where it’s injected and get taken up by the cells there.” We know this is not correct and these latest documents confirm that.
This document - a Nonclinical Overview and this Pharmacokinetics Written Summary looked at the distribution of LNPs in the blood, plasma and selected tissues of Wistar Han rats, over 48 hours after a single injection. The full results can be seen here.
As you can see, the LNPs were present in all the organs tested. As would be expected, the injection site had the highest levels which started declining after 4 hours. At 48 hours the highest concentration of LNPs were at the injection site and represented almost 25% of the administered dose.
However, there were high concentrations of LNPs in other organs, just not as high as at the injection site. The next highest was in the liver with over 16% of the administered dose in that organ at 48 hours. High concentrations were also seen in adrenal glands, spleen, bone marrow and ovaries.
What is concerning about this is that by 48 hours the concentration of LNPs was falling in the injection site but still rising in the other organs listed above. It was also still rising in many other organs where the concentration was much lower.
What happened after 48 hours? How much did the concentration of LNPs rise in the other organs and for how long? Why did the study finish at 48 hours or not get extended after it was obvious the levels were still climbing?
Read🗞 Naked Emperor Substack, Nonclinical Overview, Pharmacokinetics Written Summary, Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary
Related🔎 Pfizer Documents - March Release
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Naked Emperor’s Newsletter
Pfizer's latest data release
An initial look at Lipid Nanoparticles around the body
👍82🤬61🔥12❤11😢6
VoterGA to Release New Evidence Detailing How Election Results Were Electronically Manipulated in Georgia
In a press release today, Georgia election integrity group VoterGA announced they will “hold a press conference of national significance to release a new 11-point analysis of election data that shows how Fulton County November 2020 election results were electronically undermined.” Founder Garland Favorito referred to the evidence as “groundbreaking.”
When ⏰ Monday, 3/7 at 1PM
Livestream 📺 VoterGA Rumble
Website 💻VoterGA.org
More on GA🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
In a press release today, Georgia election integrity group VoterGA announced they will “hold a press conference of national significance to release a new 11-point analysis of election data that shows how Fulton County November 2020 election results were electronically undermined.” Founder Garland Favorito referred to the evidence as “groundbreaking.”
When ⏰ Monday, 3/7 at 1PM
Livestream 📺 VoterGA Rumble
Website 💻VoterGA.org
More on GA🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
🔥175👍53❤18👏4
Wisconsin Election Investigation Report Reveals Green Bay Voting Machines Were Connected to the Internet and Controlled by a Zuckerberg CTCL Agent
“The OSC [Office of Special Counsel] consulted with multiple computer security experts regarding voting machines. Two major machine manufacturers were identified in Wisconsin, Dominion Voting and ESS. The OSC viewed extensive reporting about the integrity of the machines. The OSC learned that some Dominion machines are extremely vulnerable to hacking and manipulation. These specific machines can be manipulated to alter actual votes cast— either surreptitiously or by the machine technicians.
The Special Counsel reviewed extensive reporting of a Dominion machine failure event in another State. The OSC was able to identify, through the reports of experts, that the failed machine recorded two anonymous and unauthorized access events from its VPN. This means, contrary to what Dominion has publicly stated, that at least some machines had access to the internet on election night. Shortly after the unauthorized access was recorded, the machine failed and was reset, wiping all voting history and forcing that election administrator to rely on unverifiable paper printouts from the failed machine.
ESS machines were equally problematic. The central problem is that several of the machines are made with a 4G wireless modem installed, enabling them to connect to the internet through a Wi-Fi hotspot. One municipality under investigation in Wisconsin by the OSC admitted that these machines had these modems and were connected to the internet on election night. The reason given was to “transmit data” about votes to the county clerks.
The OSC learned that all machines in Green Bay were ESS machines and were connected to a secret, hidden Wi-Fi access point at the Grand Hyatt hotel, which was the location used by the City of Green Bay on the day of the 2020 Presidential election. The OSC discovered the Wi-Fi, machines, and ballots were controlled by a single individual who was not a government employee but an agent of a special interest group operating in Wisconsin.” The report later reveals this operative was Michael Spitzer Rubenstein of the National Vote at Home Institute, a Zuckerberg-CTCL “recommended partner.”
Special Counsel Gableman also notes that an election management company had possession of ballot images and physical ballots on election night: “It was discovered that Command Central, LLC, received images of cast ballots on election night using the internet. Command Central is alleged to be holding actual ballots cast on election night at its offices in Minnesota in violation of Wisconsin law. The OSC was not able to complete this portion of its investigation, however.
As of the date of this Report, the voting machine companies have refused to comply with the OSC’s legislative subpoenas, and have provided no data. The OSC considers this investigation incomplete but ongoing.”
Read 📑 Second Interim Report
*Excerpts are from pages 13 - 16, 68
Related🔎 KanekoaTheGreat Substack
Hat tip🤠 @ThePatriotAU
More on WI🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
“The OSC [Office of Special Counsel] consulted with multiple computer security experts regarding voting machines. Two major machine manufacturers were identified in Wisconsin, Dominion Voting and ESS. The OSC viewed extensive reporting about the integrity of the machines. The OSC learned that some Dominion machines are extremely vulnerable to hacking and manipulation. These specific machines can be manipulated to alter actual votes cast— either surreptitiously or by the machine technicians.
The Special Counsel reviewed extensive reporting of a Dominion machine failure event in another State. The OSC was able to identify, through the reports of experts, that the failed machine recorded two anonymous and unauthorized access events from its VPN. This means, contrary to what Dominion has publicly stated, that at least some machines had access to the internet on election night. Shortly after the unauthorized access was recorded, the machine failed and was reset, wiping all voting history and forcing that election administrator to rely on unverifiable paper printouts from the failed machine.
ESS machines were equally problematic. The central problem is that several of the machines are made with a 4G wireless modem installed, enabling them to connect to the internet through a Wi-Fi hotspot. One municipality under investigation in Wisconsin by the OSC admitted that these machines had these modems and were connected to the internet on election night. The reason given was to “transmit data” about votes to the county clerks.
The OSC learned that all machines in Green Bay were ESS machines and were connected to a secret, hidden Wi-Fi access point at the Grand Hyatt hotel, which was the location used by the City of Green Bay on the day of the 2020 Presidential election. The OSC discovered the Wi-Fi, machines, and ballots were controlled by a single individual who was not a government employee but an agent of a special interest group operating in Wisconsin.” The report later reveals this operative was Michael Spitzer Rubenstein of the National Vote at Home Institute, a Zuckerberg-CTCL “recommended partner.”
Special Counsel Gableman also notes that an election management company had possession of ballot images and physical ballots on election night: “It was discovered that Command Central, LLC, received images of cast ballots on election night using the internet. Command Central is alleged to be holding actual ballots cast on election night at its offices in Minnesota in violation of Wisconsin law. The OSC was not able to complete this portion of its investigation, however.
As of the date of this Report, the voting machine companies have refused to comply with the OSC’s legislative subpoenas, and have provided no data. The OSC considers this investigation incomplete but ongoing.”
Read 📑 Second Interim Report
*Excerpts are from pages 13 - 16, 68
Related🔎 KanekoaTheGreat Substack
Hat tip🤠 @ThePatriotAU
More on WI🔦🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Kanekoa News
Widespread Election Fraud in Wisconsin - Part VI
Michael Gableman reveals 'widespread election fraud' in nursing homes and how a CTCL-funded Democrat operative ran Green Bay's election from his Hyatt Regency hotel room.
🤬181👍43🔥30❤7👏5
Patrick Colbeck ‘Audits’ the Michigan Auditor General Report on Elections - Discovers 45K Vote Discrepancy | Let’s Fix Stuff
The long-awaited Michigan Auditor General Report on the Michigan Bureau of Elections was released today. Former Michigan State Senator Patrick Colbeck breaks down the report and finds a number noteworthy flaws, including evidence of a potential 45K over-vote. “In essence, I have audited the Auditor General’s audit of the Bureau of Elections audit procedures,” Colbeck writes.
FINDING 1: MI Auditor General reports 45K fewer votes than the MI SoS.
The actual number of votes cast in the November 3, 2020 election per the statement of votes and the Michigan Secretary of State is 5,579,317. The Auditor General stated that 5,533,818 votes were cast. That figure is not even sufficient to account for the number of votes cast for President, which was 5,539,302. There is a discrepancy of 45,499 ballots. This discrepancy brings into question all other numerical conclusions brought forward in their report as it questions the source of data used. The fact that they used Bureau of Elections (BOE) queries from the Qualified Voter File (QVF) to arrive at their numbers highlights a material deficiency in the quality of the QVF data.
FINDING 2: 45K voters missing in the QVF suggests possible significant over-vote.
MCL 168.509q requires that voting history data be maintained for 5 years. The Auditor General analysis of the QVF data revealed that 45,499 voters from the 2020 General Election were not retained in the QVF. This also indicates a potential significant over-vote in the 2020 election that provides substantive grounds for decertification of the 2020 General Election. This is a material deficiency.
FINDING 3: MI SoS ordered deletion of Pollbook software in violation of federal law.
USC 52 Section 20701 requires that “all” election records be retained for a period of at least 22 months after the election. The Michigan Bureau of Elections ordered the deletion of “EPB software and associated files” by the “seventh calendar day following the final canvas and certification of the election.” This begs the question as to why the Bureau of Elections would seek to delete the EPB software since this same software would presumably be needed in support of upcoming election operations.
FINDING 4: The audit did not address the importance of analyzing the election record chain of custody during an election audit.
Sadly, the term “chain of custody” did not appear at all in the report tasked with the objective of ensuring the integrity of elections. This is a material deficiency.
FINDING 5: The audit did not address the importance of electronic logs as data to be evaluated during an audit of election records.
The report failed to address one of the most significant weaknesses in the current post-election audit process: The lack of examination of electronic logs related to the processing of key election records during an election cycle. This oversight is particularly important in light of the fact that most electronic records processing is not observable by poll challengers, poll watchers or even poll inspectors. This is a material deficiency.
Read more🗞 Let’s Fix Stuff, Michigan Auditor General Report on the Michigan Bureau of Elections
Learn more🔦 MI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The long-awaited Michigan Auditor General Report on the Michigan Bureau of Elections was released today. Former Michigan State Senator Patrick Colbeck breaks down the report and finds a number noteworthy flaws, including evidence of a potential 45K over-vote. “In essence, I have audited the Auditor General’s audit of the Bureau of Elections audit procedures,” Colbeck writes.
FINDING 1: MI Auditor General reports 45K fewer votes than the MI SoS.
The actual number of votes cast in the November 3, 2020 election per the statement of votes and the Michigan Secretary of State is 5,579,317. The Auditor General stated that 5,533,818 votes were cast. That figure is not even sufficient to account for the number of votes cast for President, which was 5,539,302. There is a discrepancy of 45,499 ballots. This discrepancy brings into question all other numerical conclusions brought forward in their report as it questions the source of data used. The fact that they used Bureau of Elections (BOE) queries from the Qualified Voter File (QVF) to arrive at their numbers highlights a material deficiency in the quality of the QVF data.
FINDING 2: 45K voters missing in the QVF suggests possible significant over-vote.
MCL 168.509q requires that voting history data be maintained for 5 years. The Auditor General analysis of the QVF data revealed that 45,499 voters from the 2020 General Election were not retained in the QVF. This also indicates a potential significant over-vote in the 2020 election that provides substantive grounds for decertification of the 2020 General Election. This is a material deficiency.
FINDING 3: MI SoS ordered deletion of Pollbook software in violation of federal law.
USC 52 Section 20701 requires that “all” election records be retained for a period of at least 22 months after the election. The Michigan Bureau of Elections ordered the deletion of “EPB software and associated files” by the “seventh calendar day following the final canvas and certification of the election.” This begs the question as to why the Bureau of Elections would seek to delete the EPB software since this same software would presumably be needed in support of upcoming election operations.
FINDING 4: The audit did not address the importance of analyzing the election record chain of custody during an election audit.
Sadly, the term “chain of custody” did not appear at all in the report tasked with the objective of ensuring the integrity of elections. This is a material deficiency.
FINDING 5: The audit did not address the importance of electronic logs as data to be evaluated during an audit of election records.
The report failed to address one of the most significant weaknesses in the current post-election audit process: The lack of examination of electronic logs related to the processing of key election records during an election cycle. This oversight is particularly important in light of the fact that most electronic records processing is not observable by poll challengers, poll watchers or even poll inspectors. This is a material deficiency.
Read more🗞 Let’s Fix Stuff, Michigan Auditor General Report on the Michigan Bureau of Elections
Learn more🔦 MI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍127🔥28🤬12
CHD Says Pfizer and FDA Dropped Data Bombshell on COVID Vaccine Consumers | Yahoo
Clinical trial data contradicts ‘safe and effective’ government/industry mantra
In a 55,000-page set of documents released on Tuesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) is for the first time allowing the public to access data Pfizer submitted to FDA from its clinical trials in support of a COVID-19 vaccine license.
A 38-page report included in the documents features an Appendix, “List of Adverse Events of Special Interest,” that lists 1,291 different adverse events following vaccination. The list includes acute kidney injury, acute flaccid myelitis, anti-sperm antibody positive, brain stem embolism, brain stem thrombosis, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, cardiac ventricular thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, central nervous system vasculitis, death neonatal, deep vein thrombosis, encephalitis brain stem, encephalitis hemorrhagic, frontal lobe epilepsy, foaming at mouth, epileptic psychosis, facial paralysis, fetal distress syndrome, gastrointestinal amyloidosis, generalized tonic-clonic seizure, Hashimoto's encephalopathy, hepatic vascular thrombosis, herpes zoster reactivation, immune-mediated hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, jugular vein embolism, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, liver injury, low birth weight, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, myocarditis, neonatal seizure, pancreatitis, pneumonia, stillbirth, tachycardia, temporal lobe epilepsy, testicular autoimmunity, thrombotic cerebral infarction, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, venous thrombosis neonatal, and vertebral artery thrombosis among 1,246 other medical conditions following vaccination.
“This is a bombshell,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) president and general counsel Mary Holland. “At least now we know why the FDA and Pfizer wanted to keep this data under wraps for 75 years. These findings should put an immediate end to the Pfizer COVID vaccines. The potential for serious harm is very clear, and those injured by the vaccines are prohibited from suing Pfizer for damages.”
From mid-December, 2020 through February 18, 2022, the U.S. government’s database, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has received 1,134,984 reports of adverse events, including 24,402 deaths, following COVID vaccination. Additionally, there have been 4,021 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in the U.S. with 2,475 cases associated with Pfizer, 1,364 cases with Moderna and 171 cases with J&J’s COVID vaccine. These include 643 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis in children aged 12 to 17.
A recent study conducted by Columbia University concluded that VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, which is "consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias." A 2010 HHS-funded investigation found the underreporting factor to be even higher. The report, written by Lazarus et al., determined that vaccine injuries were happening in about 1 out of every 40 people per vaccine and that that VAERS was missing more that 99%.
The FDA’s attempt to suppress these data in support of the pharmaceutical industry’s bottom line isn’t a new phenomenon in this country’s public health system. For more information on pharmaceutical corruption and the tight relationship the industry has with government regulatory agencies, read The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health by CHD Chair and lead counsel Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Read🗞 Yahoo, Cumulative Analysis of Post Authorization Adverse Event Reports
Watch 📺 Dr. Malone on War Room
Related🔎
• Pfizer Documents - March Release
• Columbia University Estimates VAERS Underreports Adverse Events by 20x
• HHS Study Finds Only 1% of Vaccine Adverse Events Are Reported
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Clinical trial data contradicts ‘safe and effective’ government/industry mantra
In a 55,000-page set of documents released on Tuesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) is for the first time allowing the public to access data Pfizer submitted to FDA from its clinical trials in support of a COVID-19 vaccine license.
A 38-page report included in the documents features an Appendix, “List of Adverse Events of Special Interest,” that lists 1,291 different adverse events following vaccination. The list includes acute kidney injury, acute flaccid myelitis, anti-sperm antibody positive, brain stem embolism, brain stem thrombosis, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, cardiac ventricular thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, central nervous system vasculitis, death neonatal, deep vein thrombosis, encephalitis brain stem, encephalitis hemorrhagic, frontal lobe epilepsy, foaming at mouth, epileptic psychosis, facial paralysis, fetal distress syndrome, gastrointestinal amyloidosis, generalized tonic-clonic seizure, Hashimoto's encephalopathy, hepatic vascular thrombosis, herpes zoster reactivation, immune-mediated hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, jugular vein embolism, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, liver injury, low birth weight, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, myocarditis, neonatal seizure, pancreatitis, pneumonia, stillbirth, tachycardia, temporal lobe epilepsy, testicular autoimmunity, thrombotic cerebral infarction, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, venous thrombosis neonatal, and vertebral artery thrombosis among 1,246 other medical conditions following vaccination.
“This is a bombshell,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) president and general counsel Mary Holland. “At least now we know why the FDA and Pfizer wanted to keep this data under wraps for 75 years. These findings should put an immediate end to the Pfizer COVID vaccines. The potential for serious harm is very clear, and those injured by the vaccines are prohibited from suing Pfizer for damages.”
From mid-December, 2020 through February 18, 2022, the U.S. government’s database, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has received 1,134,984 reports of adverse events, including 24,402 deaths, following COVID vaccination. Additionally, there have been 4,021 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in the U.S. with 2,475 cases associated with Pfizer, 1,364 cases with Moderna and 171 cases with J&J’s COVID vaccine. These include 643 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis in children aged 12 to 17.
A recent study conducted by Columbia University concluded that VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, which is "consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias." A 2010 HHS-funded investigation found the underreporting factor to be even higher. The report, written by Lazarus et al., determined that vaccine injuries were happening in about 1 out of every 40 people per vaccine and that that VAERS was missing more that 99%.
The FDA’s attempt to suppress these data in support of the pharmaceutical industry’s bottom line isn’t a new phenomenon in this country’s public health system. For more information on pharmaceutical corruption and the tight relationship the industry has with government regulatory agencies, read The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health by CHD Chair and lead counsel Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Read🗞 Yahoo, Cumulative Analysis of Post Authorization Adverse Event Reports
Watch 📺 Dr. Malone on War Room
Related🔎
• Pfizer Documents - March Release
• Columbia University Estimates VAERS Underreports Adverse Events by 20x
• HHS Study Finds Only 1% of Vaccine Adverse Events Are Reported
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍102🤬60🔥18❤3😱1
The CDC Has Been Warned a ‘Criminal’ Fraud Investigation Is ‘Ready to Go’ After Midterm Elections | Becker News
Dr. Robert Malone, a noted mRNA vaccine researcher, and Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most-published medical doctors in the world, gave a joint statement to The New American on Friday where they accused the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of perpetrating “criminal” fraud. Watch:
“In my opinion, withholding scientific data constitutes fraud,” Dr. Malone argued. “This is scientific fraud… If I was to publish a study in which I had a large body of epidemiologic data, and I decided to only public publish part of it because I wanted to advance some agenda, I would be guilty of scientific fraud. The paper would be withdrawn. I would be kicked out of my academic institution. I would be guilty of scientific fraud. That’s what this is.”
“And the CDC has, I’ve watched it over the years, become more and more and more a political arm and not serving its its function,” he continued. “This is the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. They are the archive of information which physicians have relied on for decades through the MMWR publication. They are the ones that are responsible for providing us the frontline data about what’s going on and where it’s happening and they have stopped performing that function…”
“And it is part of what’s underlied the attacks that Peter and I have sustained from the press,” Dr. Malone went on. “If you think about it, the underlying thesis is, ‘well, the CDC didn’t say that, so therefore you’re spreading medical misinformation.’ But now we learn who’s really been spreading medical misinformation, the CDC…”
“There are going to be legal consequences, and I believe [the folks working at the CDC that gave these interviews to the New York Times] have a choice,” Dr. Malone said. “These government employees that have been participating in hiding this data, they can either be defendants or they can be witnesses. It is time for them to step up and speak out. And if they want do a whistleblower action, speak to Senator Ron Johnson, his office is in business looking for this.”
“And when the midterms are done and he’s reelected and the Republicans take the Senate, [Senator Ron Johnson] is going to be in charge of the Senate subcommittee on investigations,” Malone added. “And I can tell you that he is ready to go.”
Dr. Peter McCullough then weighed in on the matter of holding the government accountable for withholding and manipulating data.
“This isn’t the only area of concern on data transparency,” Dr. McCullough said. “The FDA and Pfizer are being sued for a release of their full dossier. Many of you know that there now is an accelerated release of the data, but the reluctance to release information on a biological product that each and every Americans is being asked, if not mandated to take, the reluctance to do so should make everyone concerned.”
“The other area of data transparency we’re extremely concerned about is the Department of Defense epidemiological database information that was released on the January 24th Senate panel, a Second Opinion chaired by Senator Ron Johnson, and their lead attorney, Tom Renz, co-counsel, Leigh Dundas, presented the data and the whistleblowers in fact, did disclose their names, lead whistleblower, being flight surgeon Theresa Long.”
“And it’s clear, there is a manyfold increase across many disease categories among our servicemen year over year,” Dr. McCullough went on. “The only thing that’s changed is the administration of the vaccines in large numbers… And for those who are close to the data, I think they do have a choice coming up and it’s going to be be a matter of them making the right choice and where they want to end up on what side of history.”
Read🗞 Becker News
Watch 📺 Full Video
Related🔎 NYT: The CDC Is Withholding Data, Is the DOD Manipulating Military Medical Data?
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Dr. Robert Malone, a noted mRNA vaccine researcher, and Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most-published medical doctors in the world, gave a joint statement to The New American on Friday where they accused the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of perpetrating “criminal” fraud. Watch:
“In my opinion, withholding scientific data constitutes fraud,” Dr. Malone argued. “This is scientific fraud… If I was to publish a study in which I had a large body of epidemiologic data, and I decided to only public publish part of it because I wanted to advance some agenda, I would be guilty of scientific fraud. The paper would be withdrawn. I would be kicked out of my academic institution. I would be guilty of scientific fraud. That’s what this is.”
“And the CDC has, I’ve watched it over the years, become more and more and more a political arm and not serving its its function,” he continued. “This is the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. They are the archive of information which physicians have relied on for decades through the MMWR publication. They are the ones that are responsible for providing us the frontline data about what’s going on and where it’s happening and they have stopped performing that function…”
“And it is part of what’s underlied the attacks that Peter and I have sustained from the press,” Dr. Malone went on. “If you think about it, the underlying thesis is, ‘well, the CDC didn’t say that, so therefore you’re spreading medical misinformation.’ But now we learn who’s really been spreading medical misinformation, the CDC…”
“There are going to be legal consequences, and I believe [the folks working at the CDC that gave these interviews to the New York Times] have a choice,” Dr. Malone said. “These government employees that have been participating in hiding this data, they can either be defendants or they can be witnesses. It is time for them to step up and speak out. And if they want do a whistleblower action, speak to Senator Ron Johnson, his office is in business looking for this.”
“And when the midterms are done and he’s reelected and the Republicans take the Senate, [Senator Ron Johnson] is going to be in charge of the Senate subcommittee on investigations,” Malone added. “And I can tell you that he is ready to go.”
Dr. Peter McCullough then weighed in on the matter of holding the government accountable for withholding and manipulating data.
“This isn’t the only area of concern on data transparency,” Dr. McCullough said. “The FDA and Pfizer are being sued for a release of their full dossier. Many of you know that there now is an accelerated release of the data, but the reluctance to release information on a biological product that each and every Americans is being asked, if not mandated to take, the reluctance to do so should make everyone concerned.”
“The other area of data transparency we’re extremely concerned about is the Department of Defense epidemiological database information that was released on the January 24th Senate panel, a Second Opinion chaired by Senator Ron Johnson, and their lead attorney, Tom Renz, co-counsel, Leigh Dundas, presented the data and the whistleblowers in fact, did disclose their names, lead whistleblower, being flight surgeon Theresa Long.”
“And it’s clear, there is a manyfold increase across many disease categories among our servicemen year over year,” Dr. McCullough went on. “The only thing that’s changed is the administration of the vaccines in large numbers… And for those who are close to the data, I think they do have a choice coming up and it’s going to be be a matter of them making the right choice and where they want to end up on what side of history.”
Read🗞 Becker News
Watch 📺 Full Video
Related🔎 NYT: The CDC Is Withholding Data, Is the DOD Manipulating Military Medical Data?
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍145👏28🔥25❤7😁3🤔1🤬1
Forwarded from ElectionFraud20.org
DatabaseManipulations.png
303.8 KB
Similarities Between the DoD Vaccine Injuries Cover Up and Election Fraud...
@LibertyOverwatch penned an excellent summary of the "catch-22" the DoD now find themselves in.
Either the vaccine injuries are real, or the military has a much bigger and serious problem on their hands!
Either way they lose. 🤯
(Please read the article and make sure to subscribe to the channel.)
Let's be clear, the tactics used to conceal the vaccine injuries are no different than the ones used to conceal Biden's loss.
The only difference is they got caught red handed.
The attached image comes directly from the "Renz Law" website, and is only used to "illustrate" what happened at the 2020 General Elections.
⚠️This clearly shows how easy databases can be manipulated.⚠️
Voter rolls and voter history files are also stored in databases. Should we be concerned? 🤔
-------
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
@LibertyOverwatch penned an excellent summary of the "catch-22" the DoD now find themselves in.
Either the vaccine injuries are real, or the military has a much bigger and serious problem on their hands!
Either way they lose. 🤯
(Please read the article and make sure to subscribe to the channel.)
Let's be clear, the tactics used to conceal the vaccine injuries are no different than the ones used to conceal Biden's loss.
The only difference is they got caught red handed.
The attached image comes directly from the "Renz Law" website, and is only used to "illustrate" what happened at the 2020 General Elections.
⚠️This clearly shows how easy databases can be manipulated.⚠️
Voter rolls and voter history files are also stored in databases. Should we be concerned? 🤔
-------
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
👍110🔥36🤬3
A Covid Ministry of Truth: Surgeon General Calls on Big Tech to Turn Over Covid-19 Misinformation Data | NYT
Biden’s surgeon general on Thursday formally requested that the major tech platforms submit information about the scale of Covid-19 misinformation on social networks, search engines, crowdsourced platforms, e-commerce platforms and instant messaging systems.
A request for information from the surgeon general’s office demanded that tech platforms send data and analysis on the prevalence of Covid-19 misinformation on their sites, starting with common examples of vaccine misinformation documented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The notice asks the companies to submit “exactly how many users saw or may have been exposed to instances of Covid-19 misinformation,” as well as aggregate data on demographics that may have been disproportionately exposed to or affected by the misinformation.
The surgeon general, Dr. Vivek Murthy, also demanded information from the platforms about the major sources of Covid-19 misinformation, including those that engaged in the sale of unproven Covid-19 products, services and treatments.
Companies have until May 2 to submit the data. Denying requests for information does not carry a penalty, but the notice is the first formal request from the Biden administration of the tech companies to submit Covid-19 misinformation data, according to the surgeon general’s office.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) points out that in the last paragraph of this New York Times article, we learn that the federal government wants citizens to start “sharing” information on “misinformation”:
“We’re asking anyone with relevant insights — from original research and data sets to personal stories that speak to the role of misinformation in public health — to share them with us,” Dr. Murthy said according to the NYT.
“This is how they dress up the Stasi in 21st-century euphemism to encourage ratting out your friends and neighbors: ‘Please share with the feds. They care what you think,’” CHD wrote.
Read more🗞 NYT, CHD
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Biden’s surgeon general on Thursday formally requested that the major tech platforms submit information about the scale of Covid-19 misinformation on social networks, search engines, crowdsourced platforms, e-commerce platforms and instant messaging systems.
A request for information from the surgeon general’s office demanded that tech platforms send data and analysis on the prevalence of Covid-19 misinformation on their sites, starting with common examples of vaccine misinformation documented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The notice asks the companies to submit “exactly how many users saw or may have been exposed to instances of Covid-19 misinformation,” as well as aggregate data on demographics that may have been disproportionately exposed to or affected by the misinformation.
The surgeon general, Dr. Vivek Murthy, also demanded information from the platforms about the major sources of Covid-19 misinformation, including those that engaged in the sale of unproven Covid-19 products, services and treatments.
Companies have until May 2 to submit the data. Denying requests for information does not carry a penalty, but the notice is the first formal request from the Biden administration of the tech companies to submit Covid-19 misinformation data, according to the surgeon general’s office.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) points out that in the last paragraph of this New York Times article, we learn that the federal government wants citizens to start “sharing” information on “misinformation”:
“We’re asking anyone with relevant insights — from original research and data sets to personal stories that speak to the role of misinformation in public health — to share them with us,” Dr. Murthy said according to the NYT.
“This is how they dress up the Stasi in 21st-century euphemism to encourage ratting out your friends and neighbors: ‘Please share with the feds. They care what you think,’” CHD wrote.
Read more🗞 NYT, CHD
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
NY Times
The surgeon general calls on Big Tech to turn over Covid-19 misinformation data.
Dr. Vivek Murthy also demanded information from the platforms about the major sources of Covid-19 misinformation. Companies have until May 2 to submit the data.
🤬181👍40😁7❤2😱2
CDC Director Now Says There Was Perhaps ‘Too Much Optimism’ with COVID-19 Vaccines
In his search for “Covid misinformation,” the Surgeon General should start with his own department and the CDC:
In a talk at the University of Washington on Thursday, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said she believes the center misled the public about long-term effectiveness with “too much optimism and too little caution.”
The CDC failed to communicate all of the unknowns. Experts didn’t explain how immunity can wane, or fade. Nor did they warn the public that other variants could diminish vaccine effectiveness.
“Many of us wanted to say, ‘OK, this is our ticket out. Yeah, we’re done.’ So, I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way,” she explained. “I think all of us wanted this to be done.”
To make the public better understand future vaccines, Walensky hopes that the CDC will do a more effective job at teaching the public that science is not always clear-cut, especially in the early stages. But most importantly, she wants people to understand that health guidance is always based on what’s known at the time. And that knowledge is always changing.
But as Walensky stressed, “science is gray. And it “is not always immediate.”
“Sometimes, it takes months or years to actually find out the answer,” she continued. “But you have to make decisions in a pandemic before you have that answer.”
Walensky’s statements make it clear that the Surgeon General isn’t looking for “misinformation” in a field land-mined with “grey areas,” the Great Reset regime is seeking to identify the free thinkers, the non-compliant, anyone willing to defend their constitutional rights and stand up to the globalist government’s fascist brainwashing campaigns.
Read 🗞 The Outsider
Watch 📺 Full Interview, Summary Clip
Related🔎 Surgeon General Moves Forward with Covid Ministry of Truth
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
In his search for “Covid misinformation,” the Surgeon General should start with his own department and the CDC:
In a talk at the University of Washington on Thursday, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said she believes the center misled the public about long-term effectiveness with “too much optimism and too little caution.”
The CDC failed to communicate all of the unknowns. Experts didn’t explain how immunity can wane, or fade. Nor did they warn the public that other variants could diminish vaccine effectiveness.
“Many of us wanted to say, ‘OK, this is our ticket out. Yeah, we’re done.’ So, I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way,” she explained. “I think all of us wanted this to be done.”
To make the public better understand future vaccines, Walensky hopes that the CDC will do a more effective job at teaching the public that science is not always clear-cut, especially in the early stages. But most importantly, she wants people to understand that health guidance is always based on what’s known at the time. And that knowledge is always changing.
But as Walensky stressed, “science is gray. And it “is not always immediate.”
“Sometimes, it takes months or years to actually find out the answer,” she continued. “But you have to make decisions in a pandemic before you have that answer.”
Walensky’s statements make it clear that the Surgeon General isn’t looking for “misinformation” in a field land-mined with “grey areas,” the Great Reset regime is seeking to identify the free thinkers, the non-compliant, anyone willing to defend their constitutional rights and stand up to the globalist government’s fascist brainwashing campaigns.
Read 🗞 The Outsider
Watch 📺 Full Interview, Summary Clip
Related🔎 Surgeon General Moves Forward with Covid Ministry of Truth
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Outsider
CDC Director Says There Was Perhaps ‘Too Much Optimism’ With COVID-19 Vaccines
CDC director Rochelle Walensky regrets the overwhelming "optimism" that the center had for the vaccines' ability to quickly end the pandemic.
🤬153👍28🔥9
The Federal Government Paid $1B to Hundreds of Media Companies to Advertise the COVID-19 Vaccines While Those Same Outlets Provided Positive Coverage of the Vaccines | The Blaze
In response to a FOIA request filed by TheBlaze, HHS revealed that it purchased advertising from major news networks including ABC, CBS, and NBC, as well as cable TV news stations Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, legacy media publications including the New York Post, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post, digital media companies like BuzzFeed News and Newsmax, and hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations as part of a "comprehensive [vaccine] media campaign.”
These outlets were collectively responsible for publishing countless articles and video segments regarding the vaccine that were nearly uniformly positive about the jab in terms of both its efficacy and safety.
The government also relied on earned media featuring "influencers" from "communities hit hard by COVID-19" and "experts" like White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci and other academics to be interviewed and promote vaccination in the news.
Congress appropriated $1 billion in fiscal year 2021 for the secretary of health to spend on activities to "strengthen vaccine confidence in the United States." The Biden regime then used those taxpayer dollars to fund a massive vax propaganda crusade.
Since the COVID-19 vaccines manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson were given emergency approval for use in the United States last year, more than 215 million Americans have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19. An estimated 94.6 million people have also received at least one booster dose. About 65% of the U.S. population has now been fully vaccinated against COVID-19, including 75% of U.S. adults and 88.8% of seniors.
In a Substack article out today, Emerald Robinson commented on The Blaze’s FOIA reveal, “The Biden administration’s money did not just pay for pro-vaccine advertising at outlets like Fox and Newsmax — it paid for an outright ban on any negative coverage. There’s a word for that kind of thing, and the word is: propaganda. Corporate news executives with no medical training and no expertise began to make ludicrous announcements that were basically blanket endorsements of the untested vaccines.”
“Let me add some personal details to the largest corporate media scandal of the year,” Robinson continued. “I have been contacted by a whistleblower inside Newsmax who has confirmed the broad details of this story… Newsmax executives agreed to take the money from Biden’s Health and Human Services (HHS) to push only positive coverage of the new COVID vaccines.”
Robinson was also contacted by top Newsmax executives and instructed to “halt any negative coverage of the vaccines in 2021.” She was told that “it was problematic” for Newsmax.
“Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy even wrote an op-ed to celebrate Joe Biden’s vaccine rollout and praise Biden’s high poll numbers,” Robinson noted. “This op-ed was basically a personal plea for the American public to take medical advice from a news organization that was secretly taking money from the Biden administration to say positive things about dangerous drugs.”
Read more🗞 The Blaze, Emerald Robinson Substack
Hat tip🤠 @AlwaysYesterday
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
In response to a FOIA request filed by TheBlaze, HHS revealed that it purchased advertising from major news networks including ABC, CBS, and NBC, as well as cable TV news stations Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, legacy media publications including the New York Post, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post, digital media companies like BuzzFeed News and Newsmax, and hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations as part of a "comprehensive [vaccine] media campaign.”
These outlets were collectively responsible for publishing countless articles and video segments regarding the vaccine that were nearly uniformly positive about the jab in terms of both its efficacy and safety.
The government also relied on earned media featuring "influencers" from "communities hit hard by COVID-19" and "experts" like White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci and other academics to be interviewed and promote vaccination in the news.
Congress appropriated $1 billion in fiscal year 2021 for the secretary of health to spend on activities to "strengthen vaccine confidence in the United States." The Biden regime then used those taxpayer dollars to fund a massive vax propaganda crusade.
Since the COVID-19 vaccines manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson were given emergency approval for use in the United States last year, more than 215 million Americans have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19. An estimated 94.6 million people have also received at least one booster dose. About 65% of the U.S. population has now been fully vaccinated against COVID-19, including 75% of U.S. adults and 88.8% of seniors.
In a Substack article out today, Emerald Robinson commented on The Blaze’s FOIA reveal, “The Biden administration’s money did not just pay for pro-vaccine advertising at outlets like Fox and Newsmax — it paid for an outright ban on any negative coverage. There’s a word for that kind of thing, and the word is: propaganda. Corporate news executives with no medical training and no expertise began to make ludicrous announcements that were basically blanket endorsements of the untested vaccines.”
“Let me add some personal details to the largest corporate media scandal of the year,” Robinson continued. “I have been contacted by a whistleblower inside Newsmax who has confirmed the broad details of this story… Newsmax executives agreed to take the money from Biden’s Health and Human Services (HHS) to push only positive coverage of the new COVID vaccines.”
Robinson was also contacted by top Newsmax executives and instructed to “halt any negative coverage of the vaccines in 2021.” She was told that “it was problematic” for Newsmax.
“Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy even wrote an op-ed to celebrate Joe Biden’s vaccine rollout and praise Biden’s high poll numbers,” Robinson noted. “This op-ed was basically a personal plea for the American public to take medical advice from a news organization that was secretly taking money from the Biden administration to say positive things about dangerous drugs.”
Read more🗞 The Blaze, Emerald Robinson Substack
Hat tip🤠 @AlwaysYesterday
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Blaze Media
Exclusive: The federal government paid hundreds of media companies to advertise the COVID-19 vaccines while those same outlets…
In response to a FOIA request filed by TheBlaze, HHS revealed that it purchased advertising from major news networks including ABC, CBS, and NBC, as well as cable TV news stations Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, legacy media publications including the New York…
🤬217👍41🔥12🤯4👏1
Up Next: Global Food Crisis?
A large percentage of the world’s wheat, corn, and other grains - 12 percent of all calories traded globally - come from Russia and Ukraine. We were already facing a grain supply crunch even before war broke out in the “breadbasket of Europe.” Now with exports from that region cut off, food shortages are soon on the way, Andree Defois, president of consultant Strategie Grains, told Bloomberg. "Wheat will need to be rationed."
Roughly a third of world exports of barley come from Russia and Ukraine combined, 29 percent of wheat, 19 percent of maize, as well as 80 percent of sunflower oil. Much of this is usually shipped through the Black Sea ports of Odesa, Kherson, or Mykolaiv, which are now war zones.
“Loading is at a standstill. It is not just the ports: you can’t get a ship in there. Nobody wants to get stranded,” said Abdolreza Abbassian, the ex-head of agro-markets at the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization. Lloyd’s List reports that the northern Black Sea and the Azov have been declared “warlike operations areas,” implying double pay for crews, if you can get them.
“Russian and Ukrainian wheat are not being offered. Critical corn flows to the world are being stymied. If Ukraine farmers do not plant substantial quantities of corn next month, the supply crunch will be very severe,” warned Rabobank, adding that, “grain shortfalls are likely to be so pronounced as to require demand destruction or rationing.”
It turns out that Russia doesn’t just supply grain and energy to the entire world, it is also a major supplier of every crop nutrient farmers need, Tucker Carlson explained.
Energy and farm commodities are interlinked. Natural gas is a feedstock for fertilizer production in Europe, and lest we forget, Russia and Belarus together account for a third of the world’s exports of potash, the Sydney Morning Herald wrote.
“Soaring fertilizer prices are likely to spike food prices,” Iowa corn and soybean farmer Ben Riensche said on Tucker’s Wednesday show. “If you're upset that gas is up a dollar or two a gallon, wait until your grocery bill is up $1000 a month. And it may not manifest itself in terms of price, it could be quantity as well. Empty shelf syndrome might just be starting."
"The price of growing my crops, or the major crops, corn, soybeans, wheat, rice, cotton is up 30 to 40 percent. And most of it is fertilizer,” Riensche noted. “Nitrogen prices are up 3 times from the last crop we put in. Phosphorous and potassium have doubled."
We are now learning what it means to eject the world’s only full-spectrum commodity superpower from the international financial and trading system.
We have not even begun to feel the blowback for the Western aerospace and semiconductor industry should Russia retaliate by exploiting its lockhold over the global supply chain for titanium, palladium and neon.
The world faces what amounts to a commodity “black swan” across the gamut of primary resources. Oil, gas, coal, and the “ags” are all spiraling higher together, with metals catching up fast. It is a systemic stagflation shock, an intractable problem for central bankers. It acts like a war reparations tax on the economies of importing nations and could trigger uprisings in vulnerable countries.
On Friday, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization Food Price Index, a measure of the monthly change in international prices of a basket of food commodities, reported record-high prices for February. Prices are now higher than they were in February 2011 when skyrocketing food costs set off anti-government protests, uprisings, and armed rebellions around the Arab world, ZeroHedge reported.
Read more🗞 Sydney Morning Herald, Natural News, Edward Slavsquat Substack, ZeroHedge
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
A large percentage of the world’s wheat, corn, and other grains - 12 percent of all calories traded globally - come from Russia and Ukraine. We were already facing a grain supply crunch even before war broke out in the “breadbasket of Europe.” Now with exports from that region cut off, food shortages are soon on the way, Andree Defois, president of consultant Strategie Grains, told Bloomberg. "Wheat will need to be rationed."
Roughly a third of world exports of barley come from Russia and Ukraine combined, 29 percent of wheat, 19 percent of maize, as well as 80 percent of sunflower oil. Much of this is usually shipped through the Black Sea ports of Odesa, Kherson, or Mykolaiv, which are now war zones.
“Loading is at a standstill. It is not just the ports: you can’t get a ship in there. Nobody wants to get stranded,” said Abdolreza Abbassian, the ex-head of agro-markets at the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization. Lloyd’s List reports that the northern Black Sea and the Azov have been declared “warlike operations areas,” implying double pay for crews, if you can get them.
“Russian and Ukrainian wheat are not being offered. Critical corn flows to the world are being stymied. If Ukraine farmers do not plant substantial quantities of corn next month, the supply crunch will be very severe,” warned Rabobank, adding that, “grain shortfalls are likely to be so pronounced as to require demand destruction or rationing.”
It turns out that Russia doesn’t just supply grain and energy to the entire world, it is also a major supplier of every crop nutrient farmers need, Tucker Carlson explained.
Energy and farm commodities are interlinked. Natural gas is a feedstock for fertilizer production in Europe, and lest we forget, Russia and Belarus together account for a third of the world’s exports of potash, the Sydney Morning Herald wrote.
“Soaring fertilizer prices are likely to spike food prices,” Iowa corn and soybean farmer Ben Riensche said on Tucker’s Wednesday show. “If you're upset that gas is up a dollar or two a gallon, wait until your grocery bill is up $1000 a month. And it may not manifest itself in terms of price, it could be quantity as well. Empty shelf syndrome might just be starting."
"The price of growing my crops, or the major crops, corn, soybeans, wheat, rice, cotton is up 30 to 40 percent. And most of it is fertilizer,” Riensche noted. “Nitrogen prices are up 3 times from the last crop we put in. Phosphorous and potassium have doubled."
We are now learning what it means to eject the world’s only full-spectrum commodity superpower from the international financial and trading system.
We have not even begun to feel the blowback for the Western aerospace and semiconductor industry should Russia retaliate by exploiting its lockhold over the global supply chain for titanium, palladium and neon.
The world faces what amounts to a commodity “black swan” across the gamut of primary resources. Oil, gas, coal, and the “ags” are all spiraling higher together, with metals catching up fast. It is a systemic stagflation shock, an intractable problem for central bankers. It acts like a war reparations tax on the economies of importing nations and could trigger uprisings in vulnerable countries.
On Friday, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization Food Price Index, a measure of the monthly change in international prices of a basket of food commodities, reported record-high prices for February. Prices are now higher than they were in February 2011 when skyrocketing food costs set off anti-government protests, uprisings, and armed rebellions around the Arab world, ZeroHedge reported.
Read more🗞 Sydney Morning Herald, Natural News, Edward Slavsquat Substack, ZeroHedge
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Sydney Morning Herald
Putin’s energy shock is becoming a world food crisis. Brace for rationing.
Shortage of grain and other agricultural commodities means a billion of the world’s poorest people will go even hungrier thanks to Putin’s deranged misadventure, and some will starve. Our next moral mission is to help them.
👍81🤬28🤔12😢6🔥2🥰2👏1