The Georgia Ballot Harvesting Investigation Is Just the Tip of the Fraud Iceberg | JF Radio
John Solomon joined John Fredericks today to discuss the newly launched ballot tracking investigation by Georgia SOS Brad Raffensperger.
Although Raffensperger is widely despised by the election integrity focused America First grassroots, he has a history of taking a stand against ballot harvesting. For example, he successfully defended Georgia against a Mark Elias lawsuit that tried to overturn the state’s ban on ballot harvesting.
“I think he’s a man who’s always been against harvesting,” Solomon said. Although he failed to look at the drop box surveillance video that he fought to have installed, “when provided evidence by True the Vote that there was video footage, cell phone records, and admission by a participant of harvesting, he is now directly engaged.”
True the Vote’s evidence suggests there could be 50K+ illegally harvested drop box ballots in Georgia. Solomon continued:
“I think — if Raffensperger corroborates this [True the Vote] information, which I think he will based on my ability to see these video tapes and interview people — they’ll be prosecutions. And then the question is: How widespread was this? Was it just a few people or was it 10K, 20K, 30K votes like the allegations from True the Vote seem to suggest; 5K trips at 10 ballots a piece equals 50K ballots delivered illegally. That could have changed the outcome of the election.”
Here’s where it gets even more interesting:
“Then the bigger question is: Did tax exempt groups violate federal tax laws,” as the True the Vote whistleblower alleges, Solomon asked. “And did this happen in other states? I’m being told tonight that there’s evidence of this in Wisconsin that’s beginning to emerge, in Arizona…, and in Pennsylvania.”
Solomon also revealed that Arizona AG Mark Brnovich “has prosecuted at least a half dozen people for… illegal ballot harvesting — they’re facing felonies… There are allegations in the court record that Arizona is now looking at a much larger orchestrated effort, much like what True the Vote described in Georgia.”
Watch 📺 JF Radio Interview with John Solomon
Read 🗞 JTN Georgia Ballot Harvesting Investigation Summary
Related🔎 GBI Declines to Investigate True the Vote Allegations | Wigwam Resort AZ - GA Ballot Trafficking Allegations | Investigation Connecting Maricopa County to Fulton County
State Threads🔦🧵 GA | AZ | WI | PA
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
John Solomon joined John Fredericks today to discuss the newly launched ballot tracking investigation by Georgia SOS Brad Raffensperger.
Although Raffensperger is widely despised by the election integrity focused America First grassroots, he has a history of taking a stand against ballot harvesting. For example, he successfully defended Georgia against a Mark Elias lawsuit that tried to overturn the state’s ban on ballot harvesting.
“I think he’s a man who’s always been against harvesting,” Solomon said. Although he failed to look at the drop box surveillance video that he fought to have installed, “when provided evidence by True the Vote that there was video footage, cell phone records, and admission by a participant of harvesting, he is now directly engaged.”
True the Vote’s evidence suggests there could be 50K+ illegally harvested drop box ballots in Georgia. Solomon continued:
“I think — if Raffensperger corroborates this [True the Vote] information, which I think he will based on my ability to see these video tapes and interview people — they’ll be prosecutions. And then the question is: How widespread was this? Was it just a few people or was it 10K, 20K, 30K votes like the allegations from True the Vote seem to suggest; 5K trips at 10 ballots a piece equals 50K ballots delivered illegally. That could have changed the outcome of the election.”
Here’s where it gets even more interesting:
“Then the bigger question is: Did tax exempt groups violate federal tax laws,” as the True the Vote whistleblower alleges, Solomon asked. “And did this happen in other states? I’m being told tonight that there’s evidence of this in Wisconsin that’s beginning to emerge, in Arizona…, and in Pennsylvania.”
Solomon also revealed that Arizona AG Mark Brnovich “has prosecuted at least a half dozen people for… illegal ballot harvesting — they’re facing felonies… There are allegations in the court record that Arizona is now looking at a much larger orchestrated effort, much like what True the Vote described in Georgia.”
Watch 📺 JF Radio Interview with John Solomon
Read 🗞 JTN Georgia Ballot Harvesting Investigation Summary
Related🔎 GBI Declines to Investigate True the Vote Allegations | Wigwam Resort AZ - GA Ballot Trafficking Allegations | Investigation Connecting Maricopa County to Fulton County
State Threads🔦🧵 GA | AZ | WI | PA
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Rumble
BREAKING NEWS John Solomon Breaks a Major News Story on Election Integrity in GA
January 4, 2022 - Outside the Beltway with John Fredericks @jfradioshow BREAKING NEWS John Solomon Breaks a Major News Story on Election Integrity in GA; Vernon Jones on the GA Election; Dr. Valdamir
👍61🔥9🎉2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Georgia Ballot Harvesting Investigation, Additional Details
Link 📺 JF Radio Rumble
Summary 📝 Liberty Overwatch
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Link 📺 JF Radio Rumble
Summary 📝 Liberty Overwatch
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍16🤩1
Georgia Ballot Harvesting Whistleblower Is a Game Changer - Potentially 1M Illegal Ballots | JF Radio
John Solomon joined John Fredericks again today to review additional details about the Georgia ballot trafficking investigation.
Video footage and cell phone data acquired by True the Vote suggests there were 242 ballot harvesters who made 5,662 trips to Georgia drop boxes, primarily between the hours of 12AM and 5AM.
True the Vote was able to secure the cooperation of one of the harvesters they discovered on the video tapes thanks to encouragement from his mother. This ‘John Doe’ claims that he was paid $45K by a non-profit group to deliver roughly 4,500 ballots. He reported that many others participated and laid out the names of the people and groups that were involved, describing a large mass-harvesting operation.
This “human corroboration” was the critical piece of evidence for Raffensperger and his investigators, Solomon noted. Having a whistleblower who actually admits that he was paid to harvest ballots “makes all that data, all that video footage not only all the more believable, it provides a very specific roadmap of people and names and organizations and dates and times and financial transactions.”
Fredericks points out that if 242 people each delivered 4,500 ballots, that would suggest $11M in payouts and more than a million harvested ballots between the November election and the Georgia Senate runoff.
Despite the scale of the scandal, True the Vote was only able to acquire (via FOIA request) about 15% of the drop box surveillance in Georgia. It turns out many counties defied federal election records law and discarded their tapes.
Liz Harris told Liberty Overwatch that True the Vote has similar evidence of organized ballot harvesting in Arizona.
Listen 🎧 John Fredericks and John Solomon
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread - Multi-State Ballot Harvesting Investigation
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
John Solomon joined John Fredericks again today to review additional details about the Georgia ballot trafficking investigation.
Video footage and cell phone data acquired by True the Vote suggests there were 242 ballot harvesters who made 5,662 trips to Georgia drop boxes, primarily between the hours of 12AM and 5AM.
True the Vote was able to secure the cooperation of one of the harvesters they discovered on the video tapes thanks to encouragement from his mother. This ‘John Doe’ claims that he was paid $45K by a non-profit group to deliver roughly 4,500 ballots. He reported that many others participated and laid out the names of the people and groups that were involved, describing a large mass-harvesting operation.
This “human corroboration” was the critical piece of evidence for Raffensperger and his investigators, Solomon noted. Having a whistleblower who actually admits that he was paid to harvest ballots “makes all that data, all that video footage not only all the more believable, it provides a very specific roadmap of people and names and organizations and dates and times and financial transactions.”
Fredericks points out that if 242 people each delivered 4,500 ballots, that would suggest $11M in payouts and more than a million harvested ballots between the November election and the Georgia Senate runoff.
Despite the scale of the scandal, True the Vote was only able to acquire (via FOIA request) about 15% of the drop box surveillance in Georgia. It turns out many counties defied federal election records law and discarded their tapes.
Liz Harris told Liberty Overwatch that True the Vote has similar evidence of organized ballot harvesting in Arizona.
Listen 🎧 John Fredericks and John Solomon
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread - Multi-State Ballot Harvesting Investigation
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Telegram
Liberty Overwatch
Georgia Ballot Harvesting Investigation, Additional Details
Link 📺 JF Radio Rumble
Summary 📝 Liberty Overwatch
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Link 📺 JF Radio Rumble
Summary 📝 Liberty Overwatch
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍56🔥34🎉4❤2🤩1
‘The End of the Beginning’: True the Vote Will Release Ballot Harvesting Evidence for Five Additional States | True the Vote
True the Vote Founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, released the following statement today regarding the Georgia ballot trafficking investigation:
I'm writing today to share a recent development that you will undoubtedly find interesting.
After a year's worth of research and analysis, True the Vote submitted three official complaints to the Georgia Secretary of State's office regarding occurrences in the 2020 General and 2021 Run-off Elections.
As a result, on January 3, 2022, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced a statewide investigation into ballot trafficking in Georgia.
You can read more about the announcement here - Georgia Opens Investigation Into Possible Illegal Ballot Harvesting in 2020 Election
Shockingly similar findings will soon be released to appropriate authorities in five additional states.
This statement is the limit of our public comments at this time so as not to impede investigative efforts currently underway. We will continue to provide updates directly to you in email and on our website.
In 1940, Winston Churchill delivered a speech to the House of Commons. He brought news of developments that marked a turning point in the war. In the course of his comments he made a prescient observation, "Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." Today, our observation is the same. It is not the end, but it is the end of the beginning. Please stay connected, there is still much work to be done.
Thank you all for your patience and continued support. Keep the faith. God bless America.
Ever onward -
True the Vote
Link 📃 True the Vote Statement
Learn more🔦🧵GA Thread - Georgia Ballot Harvesting Whistleblower Is a Game Changer
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
True the Vote Founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, released the following statement today regarding the Georgia ballot trafficking investigation:
I'm writing today to share a recent development that you will undoubtedly find interesting.
After a year's worth of research and analysis, True the Vote submitted three official complaints to the Georgia Secretary of State's office regarding occurrences in the 2020 General and 2021 Run-off Elections.
As a result, on January 3, 2022, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced a statewide investigation into ballot trafficking in Georgia.
You can read more about the announcement here - Georgia Opens Investigation Into Possible Illegal Ballot Harvesting in 2020 Election
Shockingly similar findings will soon be released to appropriate authorities in five additional states.
This statement is the limit of our public comments at this time so as not to impede investigative efforts currently underway. We will continue to provide updates directly to you in email and on our website.
In 1940, Winston Churchill delivered a speech to the House of Commons. He brought news of developments that marked a turning point in the war. In the course of his comments he made a prescient observation, "Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." Today, our observation is the same. It is not the end, but it is the end of the beginning. Please stay connected, there is still much work to be done.
Thank you all for your patience and continued support. Keep the faith. God bless America.
Ever onward -
True the Vote
Link 📃 True the Vote Statement
Learn more🔦🧵GA Thread - Georgia Ballot Harvesting Whistleblower Is a Game Changer
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍87❤29🔥20🤩3
Forwarded from General Flynn ️
Thank you “True The Vote” for your incredible levels of detailed investigative work and professionalism.
👍99❤21🎉8
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why did they stop counting swing states on election night for the first time in US history❓
@KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat
👍37
Sinema to Deliver Death Blow to Dems’ Filibuster Demolition Plan? | Hot Air
Chuck Schumer’s mouth either keeps writing checks his caucus can’t deliver, or … well, that appears to be the only option. Schumer has insisted that he will call a vote on SB1, the Democrats’ ‘reform’ bill that would federalize elections in the US. The point would be to force a vote to end the legislative filibuster or carve out an exception so wide that its destruction would be inevitable.
Joe Manchin already tossed cold water on Schumer’s plan yesterday, with the folksy explanation that such carve-outs usually force you to “eat the whole turkey.” Manchin didn’t explicitly declare his opposition to a nuclear option to change the filibuster rule, but apparently Kyrsten Sinema has — repeatedly and recently, according to Axios:
“Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), also a key holdout to major filibuster reform, reiterated during the Democratic lunch she will not support any effort to get rid of the 60-vote threshold, according to two sources familiar with the call.”
Not mentioned anywhere yet is where the other 48 Senate Democrats are on the nuclear option. Some of the leadership has definitely endorsed the idea, including Dick Durbin, who was a big fan of the legislative filibuster during the Trump administration. Others, though, have been pretty quiet about it, including Sinema’s Arizona colleague Mark Kelly, who has to face purple-to-red-state voters in November. The same can be said for Catherine Cortez Masto, Maggie Hassan, and perhaps one or two other incumbent Democrats like Jon Tester in deep-red Montana.
There may be as many as six votes against a nuclear option, not just two. Forcing a vote on it, especially when it’s doomed to defeat, would put those vulnerable caucus members in the worst of all positions. They would have to cast a vote that would paint targets on their backs, either by angry constituents or by angry progressive activists based mainly in Democrats’ coastal-enclave power bases. Manchin won’t care and neither will Sinema, apparently. The rest of Schumer’s endangered incumbents won’t appreciate it at all, and are likely egging Manchin and Sinema on in their entrenched opposition in hopes that Schumer will back down. And if he forces a vote anyway and comes up short of 48 votes, Schumer will end up looking even more incompetent than he looks now.
Read 🗞 Hot Air, Townhall
Related🔎 Manchin on the Filibuster, Sinema on the Filibuster
Contact links:
Kyrsten Sinema
Joe Manchin
Catherine Cortez Masto
Maggie Hassan
Jon Tester
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Chuck Schumer’s mouth either keeps writing checks his caucus can’t deliver, or … well, that appears to be the only option. Schumer has insisted that he will call a vote on SB1, the Democrats’ ‘reform’ bill that would federalize elections in the US. The point would be to force a vote to end the legislative filibuster or carve out an exception so wide that its destruction would be inevitable.
Joe Manchin already tossed cold water on Schumer’s plan yesterday, with the folksy explanation that such carve-outs usually force you to “eat the whole turkey.” Manchin didn’t explicitly declare his opposition to a nuclear option to change the filibuster rule, but apparently Kyrsten Sinema has — repeatedly and recently, according to Axios:
“Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), also a key holdout to major filibuster reform, reiterated during the Democratic lunch she will not support any effort to get rid of the 60-vote threshold, according to two sources familiar with the call.”
Not mentioned anywhere yet is where the other 48 Senate Democrats are on the nuclear option. Some of the leadership has definitely endorsed the idea, including Dick Durbin, who was a big fan of the legislative filibuster during the Trump administration. Others, though, have been pretty quiet about it, including Sinema’s Arizona colleague Mark Kelly, who has to face purple-to-red-state voters in November. The same can be said for Catherine Cortez Masto, Maggie Hassan, and perhaps one or two other incumbent Democrats like Jon Tester in deep-red Montana.
There may be as many as six votes against a nuclear option, not just two. Forcing a vote on it, especially when it’s doomed to defeat, would put those vulnerable caucus members in the worst of all positions. They would have to cast a vote that would paint targets on their backs, either by angry constituents or by angry progressive activists based mainly in Democrats’ coastal-enclave power bases. Manchin won’t care and neither will Sinema, apparently. The rest of Schumer’s endangered incumbents won’t appreciate it at all, and are likely egging Manchin and Sinema on in their entrenched opposition in hopes that Schumer will back down. And if he forces a vote anyway and comes up short of 48 votes, Schumer will end up looking even more incompetent than he looks now.
Read 🗞 Hot Air, Townhall
Related🔎 Manchin on the Filibuster, Sinema on the Filibuster
Contact links:
Kyrsten Sinema
Joe Manchin
Catherine Cortez Masto
Maggie Hassan
Jon Tester
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
HotAir
Sinema to Senate Dems: Absolutely no nuclear option or filibuster change
The first rule of holes is ...
👍68🤩6🔥4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
David Purdue Sets the Record Straight
John Fredericks sits down with Georgia gubernatorial candidate David Purdue in an interview that capsizes some of the widely held beliefs about his stance on the 2020 election fraud.
It turns out that Purdue filed 3 lawsuits after 11/3 to fight the steal, one specifically focused on signature verification. He told Fredericks that he believes Trump won Georgia, suspects Raffensperger is engaged in a coverup, and reported that Kemp’s failure to launch an independent investigation of the 2020 election is what prompted him to run for Governor. Perdue recently recently filed a petition to audit the Fulton County ballots. Interesting interview, worth a listen.
Link 📺 WJFN Radio
Hat tip🤠 @MizDonna
Related 🔎 Perdue Fulton County Lawsuit
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
John Fredericks sits down with Georgia gubernatorial candidate David Purdue in an interview that capsizes some of the widely held beliefs about his stance on the 2020 election fraud.
It turns out that Purdue filed 3 lawsuits after 11/3 to fight the steal, one specifically focused on signature verification. He told Fredericks that he believes Trump won Georgia, suspects Raffensperger is engaged in a coverup, and reported that Kemp’s failure to launch an independent investigation of the 2020 election is what prompted him to run for Governor. Perdue recently recently filed a petition to audit the Fulton County ballots. Interesting interview, worth a listen.
Link 📺 WJFN Radio
Hat tip🤠 @MizDonna
Related 🔎 Perdue Fulton County Lawsuit
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍38❤1
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
President Donald J. Trump:
“Does anybody really think that Biden beat Obama with the Black population in select Swing State cities, but nowhere else?
That he would lose 18 out of 19 bellwether counties, and 27 out of 27 "tossup" House races, but somehow miraculously receive the most votes in American history with no coattails?
That he would lose Florida, Ohio, and Iowa and win, even thought it has never been done before?
...Never forget the crime of the 2020 Presidential Election. Never give up!”
@KanekoaTheGreat
“Does anybody really think that Biden beat Obama with the Black population in select Swing State cities, but nowhere else?
That he would lose 18 out of 19 bellwether counties, and 27 out of 27 "tossup" House races, but somehow miraculously receive the most votes in American history with no coattails?
That he would lose Florida, Ohio, and Iowa and win, even thought it has never been done before?
...Never forget the crime of the 2020 Presidential Election. Never give up!”
@KanekoaTheGreat
👍51🔥8
Judge Rejects FDA Request to Hide Pfizer Vax Data for 75 Years, Gives Them 8 Months | Aaron Siri Substack
Attorney Aaron Siri won a major vaccine transparency victory today:
A federal judge soundly rejected the FDA’s request to produce Pfizer vaccine documents at a rate of 500 pages per month (which would have taken more than 75 years), and instead ordered the FDA to produce all of the data at a clip of 55,000 pages per month (roughly 8 months)!
This is a great win for transparency and removes one of the strangleholds federal “health” authorities have had on the data needed for independent scientists to offer solutions and address serious issues with the current vaccine program – issues which include waning immunity, variants evading vaccine immunity, and, as the CDC has confirmed, that the vaccines do not prevent transmission.
No person should ever be coerced to engage in an unwanted medical procedure. And while it is bad enough the government violated this basic liberty right by mandating the Covid-19 vaccine, the government also wanted to hide the data by waiting to fully produce what it relied upon to license this product until almost every American alive today is dead.
The Judge recognized that the release of this data is of paramount public importance and should be one of the FDA’s highest priorities. He then aptly quoted James Madison:
“A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy,”
And John F. Kennedy:
“A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
Read 🗞 Aaron Siri Substack, Judge’s Order
Related🔎 Aaron Siri FDA Lawsuit, Aaron Siri CDC Lawsuit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Attorney Aaron Siri won a major vaccine transparency victory today:
A federal judge soundly rejected the FDA’s request to produce Pfizer vaccine documents at a rate of 500 pages per month (which would have taken more than 75 years), and instead ordered the FDA to produce all of the data at a clip of 55,000 pages per month (roughly 8 months)!
This is a great win for transparency and removes one of the strangleholds federal “health” authorities have had on the data needed for independent scientists to offer solutions and address serious issues with the current vaccine program – issues which include waning immunity, variants evading vaccine immunity, and, as the CDC has confirmed, that the vaccines do not prevent transmission.
No person should ever be coerced to engage in an unwanted medical procedure. And while it is bad enough the government violated this basic liberty right by mandating the Covid-19 vaccine, the government also wanted to hide the data by waiting to fully produce what it relied upon to license this product until almost every American alive today is dead.
The Judge recognized that the release of this data is of paramount public importance and should be one of the FDA’s highest priorities. He then aptly quoted James Madison:
“A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy,”
And John F. Kennedy:
“A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”
Read 🗞 Aaron Siri Substack, Judge’s Order
Related🔎 Aaron Siri FDA Lawsuit, Aaron Siri CDC Lawsuit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Substack
Instead of FDA’s Requested 500 Pages Per Month, Court Orders FDA to Produce Pfizer Covid-19 Data at Rate of 55,000 Pages Per Month!
A great win for transparency that removes a stranglehold "health" authorities have had on data independent scientists need to offer solutions and address serious issues with the vaccine program.
👍93🎉18❤17🔥3🤩2
U.S. Supreme Court Vax Mandate Hearing Today at 10AM ET
Via @techno_fog and @TracybeanzOfficial
This morning, the Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments on the OSHA vaccine mandate at 10AM EST and the CMS jab mandate at 11AM EST.
Listen🎧 USSC Oral Arguments Live Audio
Read 👓 Hearing Transcript
Related🔎
OSHA SCOTUS Appeal
6th Circuit Dissent
LA CMS Vax Mandate Stay
MO CMS Vax Mandate Stay
Federal Contractors Vax Mandate Stay
Navy Seals Vax Mandate Stay
@LibertOverwatchChannel
—
Via @techno_fog and @TracybeanzOfficial
This morning, the Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments on the OSHA vaccine mandate at 10AM EST and the CMS jab mandate at 11AM EST.
Listen🎧 USSC Oral Arguments Live Audio
Read 👓 Hearing Transcript
Related🔎
OSHA SCOTUS Appeal
6th Circuit Dissent
LA CMS Vax Mandate Stay
MO CMS Vax Mandate Stay
Federal Contractors Vax Mandate Stay
Navy Seals Vax Mandate Stay
@LibertOverwatchChannel
—
👍22🔥3🎉2
U.S. Supreme Court OSHA Vax Mandate Hearing Commentary
“Listening to this SCOTUS hearing is like watching my grandfather use the internet. They have no idea how these vaccines work (or don’t work)!”
- @ChiefNerd
“Justice Kagan falsely claims, ‘We know that the best way to prevent spread is for people to get vaccinated.’ The current vaccines do not prevent the spread of Covid.
Unhinged Justice Sotomayor baselessly claims ‘100,000 children are in the ICU [due to Covid-19].’ The current national pediatric COVID census per HHS is 3,342. Many of them being hospitalized with Covid, not because of Covid.”
- @kagbabe
“Kagan and Sotomayor think their special feelings have something to do with the law.
What an embarrassing nightmare.”
- Catturd
“Sotomayor is the dumbest SCOTUS Justice in American history.”
- Benny Johnson
“Chief Justice John Roberts says, ‘50 years ago, Congress enacted a general law. I don't think it had Covid in mind at that time. The federal government has never mandated vaccines on private employers/employees before…. The federal mandates have been referred to as a ‘workaround.’ What exactly are you trying to work around?’ he asks Elizabeth Prelogar the US Solicitor General representing the Biden [regime].
Justice Alito questions the Solicitor General representing the Biden [regime].
Alito: Some people will suffer adverse consequences from the vaccine, right?
SG: Yes.
Alito: Has OSHA ever imposed any other reg. that has some adverse health consequences?
SG: No. But no reason to think it’s precluded.’
Justice Gorsuch, ‘Congress has had a year to act on the vaccine mandates, but yet Congress hasn't acted. So now the fed gov't is going agency-to-agency to get a workaround. Why, under the Consitution, should the people's representatives not resolve the vaccine mandate issue?’”
- @kagbabe
Listen 🎧 SCOTUS Hearing
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
“Listening to this SCOTUS hearing is like watching my grandfather use the internet. They have no idea how these vaccines work (or don’t work)!”
- @ChiefNerd
“Justice Kagan falsely claims, ‘We know that the best way to prevent spread is for people to get vaccinated.’ The current vaccines do not prevent the spread of Covid.
Unhinged Justice Sotomayor baselessly claims ‘100,000 children are in the ICU [due to Covid-19].’ The current national pediatric COVID census per HHS is 3,342. Many of them being hospitalized with Covid, not because of Covid.”
- @kagbabe
“Kagan and Sotomayor think their special feelings have something to do with the law.
What an embarrassing nightmare.”
- Catturd
“Sotomayor is the dumbest SCOTUS Justice in American history.”
- Benny Johnson
“Chief Justice John Roberts says, ‘50 years ago, Congress enacted a general law. I don't think it had Covid in mind at that time. The federal government has never mandated vaccines on private employers/employees before…. The federal mandates have been referred to as a ‘workaround.’ What exactly are you trying to work around?’ he asks Elizabeth Prelogar the US Solicitor General representing the Biden [regime].
Justice Alito questions the Solicitor General representing the Biden [regime].
Alito: Some people will suffer adverse consequences from the vaccine, right?
SG: Yes.
Alito: Has OSHA ever imposed any other reg. that has some adverse health consequences?
SG: No. But no reason to think it’s precluded.’
Justice Gorsuch, ‘Congress has had a year to act on the vaccine mandates, but yet Congress hasn't acted. So now the fed gov't is going agency-to-agency to get a workaround. Why, under the Consitution, should the people's representatives not resolve the vaccine mandate issue?’”
- @kagbabe
Listen 🎧 SCOTUS Hearing
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍67❤2😁1
Liberal Media: Supreme Court Seems Skeptical of Biden's Vaccine Mandates | Axios
“The Supreme Court on Friday appeared likely to curtail the Biden administration’s most sweeping mandate for COVID-19 vaccinations,” writes Axios.
The article continues:
“A majority of the justices seemed to believe that the Biden administration’s rules, which require employers to mandate vaccines or testing for the workers, are too broad.
The court’s conservative majority seemed generally uncomfortable with the scope of OSHA’s requirement, questioning whether it should have applied to only certain, high-risk businesses or whether it overstepped the bounds of the agency's authority.”
Axios adds, “The six conservative justices’ questions left some ambiguity about precisely what the court is likely to say in its ruling. But there did not appear to be five justices who were, on balance, on OSHA’s side.”
Read 🗞 Axios
Listen 🎧 SCOTUS Hearing
Related 🔎 SCOTUS OSHA Hearing Commentary
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
“The Supreme Court on Friday appeared likely to curtail the Biden administration’s most sweeping mandate for COVID-19 vaccinations,” writes Axios.
The article continues:
“A majority of the justices seemed to believe that the Biden administration’s rules, which require employers to mandate vaccines or testing for the workers, are too broad.
The court’s conservative majority seemed generally uncomfortable with the scope of OSHA’s requirement, questioning whether it should have applied to only certain, high-risk businesses or whether it overstepped the bounds of the agency's authority.”
Axios adds, “The six conservative justices’ questions left some ambiguity about precisely what the court is likely to say in its ruling. But there did not appear to be five justices who were, on balance, on OSHA’s side.”
Read 🗞 Axios
Listen 🎧 SCOTUS Hearing
Related 🔎 SCOTUS OSHA Hearing Commentary
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Axios
Supreme Court seems skeptical of Biden's vaccine mandates
A majority of the justices appeared to believe that the Biden administration’s rules are too broad.
👍34
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Justice Alito Acknowledges Vax Side Effects
"Is it not the case that these vaccines and every other vaccine of which I’m aware and many other medications have benefits and they also have risks. And that some people who are vaccinated... will suffer adverse consequences. Is that not true of these vaccines? … There a risk [to the vaccine]. Has OSHA ever imposed any other safety regulation that imposes some extra risk on the employee?"
- Based Justice Alito
Source🤠 @CharlieKirk
Listen 🎧 SCOTUS Hearing
Related 🔎 SCOTUS OSHA Hearing Commentary, Axios Opinion
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
"Is it not the case that these vaccines and every other vaccine of which I’m aware and many other medications have benefits and they also have risks. And that some people who are vaccinated... will suffer adverse consequences. Is that not true of these vaccines? … There a risk [to the vaccine]. Has OSHA ever imposed any other safety regulation that imposes some extra risk on the employee?"
- Based Justice Alito
Source🤠 @CharlieKirk
Listen 🎧 SCOTUS Hearing
Related 🔎 SCOTUS OSHA Hearing Commentary, Axios Opinion
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍61❤6🤩3
Left-Wing SCOTUS Justices Spew COVID Misinformation to Defend Biden’s Unconstitutional Vaxx Mandate | The Federalist
Challengers of the OSHA standard argued on Friday that the agency has no right to force a medical decision on workers, but several justices pushed back on this idea using false narratives about COVID-19 to justify the federal government’s vaccine mandate.
Justice Elena Kagan suggested that getting the vaccine reduces the spread of COVID-19, a claim that’s contested by the rapidly rising number of breakthrough cases worldwide. Kagan’s opinion is that: “There’s nothing else that will perform that function better than incentivizing people strongly to vaccinate themselves. So, you know, whatever necessary means, whatever grave means, why isn’t this necessary and grave?”
Justice Stephen Breyer echoed Kagan’s sentiment that the COVID-19 vaccine would prevent the spread of the virus in the workplace. He said that the challengers’ argument that hundreds of thousands of people would quit the workforce over forced vaccination, hurting the already struggling U.S economy, is moot because “more may quit when they discover they have to work together with unvaccinated others because that means they may get the disease.”
“And more will quit because they’ll maybe die, or maybe they will be in the hospital, or maybe they’ll be sick and have to stay home for two weeks,” Breyer said.
Breyer also repeatedly used rising COVID-19 case numbers, due to the number of breakthrough cases after the omicron variant surfaced, to justify keeping OSHA’s mandate around. In fact, Breyer claimed there were “750 million new cases yesterday,” despite the U.S. population being less than half that number.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that “those numbers show that omicron is as deadly and causes as much serious disease in the unvaccinated as delta did,” despite studies showing that the newest variant is impossible to distinguish from the common cold.
She, along with Breyer, also bizarrely claimed that “hospitals are almost all full capacity,” which is not true, and lied that more than 100,000 children are hospitalized with COVID and on ventilators.
Read more 🗞 The Federalist, Red State, Becker News
Related 🔎 SCOTUS OSHA Hearing Commentary, Axios Opinion, Justice Alito Clip
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Challengers of the OSHA standard argued on Friday that the agency has no right to force a medical decision on workers, but several justices pushed back on this idea using false narratives about COVID-19 to justify the federal government’s vaccine mandate.
Justice Elena Kagan suggested that getting the vaccine reduces the spread of COVID-19, a claim that’s contested by the rapidly rising number of breakthrough cases worldwide. Kagan’s opinion is that: “There’s nothing else that will perform that function better than incentivizing people strongly to vaccinate themselves. So, you know, whatever necessary means, whatever grave means, why isn’t this necessary and grave?”
Justice Stephen Breyer echoed Kagan’s sentiment that the COVID-19 vaccine would prevent the spread of the virus in the workplace. He said that the challengers’ argument that hundreds of thousands of people would quit the workforce over forced vaccination, hurting the already struggling U.S economy, is moot because “more may quit when they discover they have to work together with unvaccinated others because that means they may get the disease.”
“And more will quit because they’ll maybe die, or maybe they will be in the hospital, or maybe they’ll be sick and have to stay home for two weeks,” Breyer said.
Breyer also repeatedly used rising COVID-19 case numbers, due to the number of breakthrough cases after the omicron variant surfaced, to justify keeping OSHA’s mandate around. In fact, Breyer claimed there were “750 million new cases yesterday,” despite the U.S. population being less than half that number.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that “those numbers show that omicron is as deadly and causes as much serious disease in the unvaccinated as delta did,” despite studies showing that the newest variant is impossible to distinguish from the common cold.
She, along with Breyer, also bizarrely claimed that “hospitals are almost all full capacity,” which is not true, and lied that more than 100,000 children are hospitalized with COVID and on ventilators.
Read more 🗞 The Federalist, Red State, Becker News
Related 🔎 SCOTUS OSHA Hearing Commentary, Axios Opinion, Justice Alito Clip
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Federalist
SCOTUS Justices Spew COVID Misinfo To Defend Biden's Vaxx Mandate
SCOTUS liberals lied that 'hospitals are almost all full capacity' and that more than 100,000 kids are hospitalized on ventilators with COVID.
🤮65👍21😱12😢10
Forwarded from The Washington Pundit (Dr E)
We need more conservative judicial aides with science backgrounds and reading comprehension skills.
👍147🔥15❤5
The Crumbling Narrative | Dr. Robert Malone Substack
Is the Government wandering in the wilderness?
The NY Times had a piece out yesterday, Will ‘Forever Boosting’ Beat the Coronavirus?, that waffles back and forth as to whether after “THE THIRD BOOSTER,” it is time to stop or change vaccines. Below are some of the notable statements of that article:
All the advisers acknowledged that they were obligated to make difficult choices, based on sparse research, in the middle of a public health emergency. But some said they felt compelled to vote for the shots because of the way the federal agencies framed the questions that they were asked to consider.
Other committee experts said that they wanted to avoid confusing the public further by dissenting, or that they voted according to their views of the evidence and were simply overruled.
‘These are not evidence-based recommendations,’ said Dr. Sarah S. Long, a pediatric infectious disease expert at Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia, and a member of the C.D.C.’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
But the immunity boost is transient; already preliminary studies are showing a decline in antibody levels just weeks after a third dose. And even at peak antibody levels, the boost does not uniformly prevent infection with Omicron, which is less vulnerable to the body’s immune defenses.
‘It doesn’t make sense to keep boosting against a strain that’s already gone,’ said Ali Ellebedy, an immunologist at Washington University in St. Louis.
This is starting to sound to my ear like the approved narrative is crumbling, a few of the culpable who succumbed to the mass formation are coming to realize that they are going to have to live with awareness of some seriously bad decisions that they have made, and that the underlying logic of the Fauci/Biden COVID-19 public policies has some serious flaws.
The government is now officially wandering, lost in the wilderness of their own private mass formation hell. Except it is not only their hell, but also ours. Perhaps a bit less propaganda and censorship, and a bit more listening to other opinions might finally be in order?
Read more🗞 Dr. Robert Malone Substack
Related🔎 WAPO Does an About-Face on the Covid Hysterics, The Pandemic Is Over, Matthias Desmet Mass Formation Psychosis
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Is the Government wandering in the wilderness?
The NY Times had a piece out yesterday, Will ‘Forever Boosting’ Beat the Coronavirus?, that waffles back and forth as to whether after “THE THIRD BOOSTER,” it is time to stop or change vaccines. Below are some of the notable statements of that article:
All the advisers acknowledged that they were obligated to make difficult choices, based on sparse research, in the middle of a public health emergency. But some said they felt compelled to vote for the shots because of the way the federal agencies framed the questions that they were asked to consider.
Other committee experts said that they wanted to avoid confusing the public further by dissenting, or that they voted according to their views of the evidence and were simply overruled.
‘These are not evidence-based recommendations,’ said Dr. Sarah S. Long, a pediatric infectious disease expert at Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia, and a member of the C.D.C.’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
But the immunity boost is transient; already preliminary studies are showing a decline in antibody levels just weeks after a third dose. And even at peak antibody levels, the boost does not uniformly prevent infection with Omicron, which is less vulnerable to the body’s immune defenses.
‘It doesn’t make sense to keep boosting against a strain that’s already gone,’ said Ali Ellebedy, an immunologist at Washington University in St. Louis.
This is starting to sound to my ear like the approved narrative is crumbling, a few of the culpable who succumbed to the mass formation are coming to realize that they are going to have to live with awareness of some seriously bad decisions that they have made, and that the underlying logic of the Fauci/Biden COVID-19 public policies has some serious flaws.
The government is now officially wandering, lost in the wilderness of their own private mass formation hell. Except it is not only their hell, but also ours. Perhaps a bit less propaganda and censorship, and a bit more listening to other opinions might finally be in order?
Read more🗞 Dr. Robert Malone Substack
Related🔎 WAPO Does an About-Face on the Covid Hysterics, The Pandemic Is Over, Matthias Desmet Mass Formation Psychosis
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Who is Robert Malone
The Crumbling Narrative
Is the Government wandering in the wilderness?
👍69🔥20😱1