David Perdue Files Lawsuit to Inspect Fulton County Ballots and ‘Certify the Correct Vote Total’
Newly-announced Georgia gubernatorial candidate David Purdue has filed a 78-page Petition to inspect Fulton County’s absentee ballots, citing “counterfeit ballots” and “equal protection” violations.
The Purdue Petition begins:
“Fulton County Board of Registration Elections Director Richard Barron and his agents… negligently, grossly negligently or intentionally engaged in and/or permitted multiple unlawful election acts and omissions [which] circumvented the majority vote of the people of the State of Georgia and thereby affected the outcome of the statewide General Election on November 3, 2020 in several races including the United States Senate race of Petitioner Perdue.”
The lawsuit acknowledges that “the factual and legal issues raised in this action are similar” to the VoterGA “Favorito-Jeffords Case” and requests that the Court “appoint Chief Judge Amero to preside over this case just as the court did in the Favorito-Jeffords Case.”
Team Purdue continues:
“This action is not an election contest case… Petitioners need not, and do not, seek redress under any federal law.
The unlawful, erroneous, negligent, grossly negligent, willful, malicious, corrupt, deceitful, and intentional manipulation of votes by Respondents violates the principles of democracy and the foundation of the Georgia Republic and is what Georgia’s founding fathers sought to prohibit when they thoughtfully crafted the Georgia Constitution to guarantee all citizens the right to one vote and the right to seek relief from the judiciary to protect their one vote from dilution, discrimination, and debasement.
From November 3, 2020 to November 4, 2020, several batches of absentee ballots were scanned multiple times, and those votes corrupt and erroneous totals were unlawfully included in the certified number of votes submitted by Fulton County to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office.
Additionally, about 161 batches of ballots representing approximately 16,000 ballots cast were withheld by Respondents from the certified results that were submitted to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office.
Thousands of unlawful counterfeit ballots were scanned, tabulated, and included in the certified total of votes submitted by Respondents to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office as established by the sworn testimony of Voyles and photographs of absentee ballots, which ballots show no creases or folds as would be required if the ballots had been placed inside absentee ballot envelopes and mailed. Respondents’ actions in this regard were ministerial.
THE PETITIONERS respectfully pray that this Court…
ORDERS to unseal absentee ballots, absentee ballot return envelopes, the absentee ballot election reports, and other paper and electronic information election materials from the General Election and to permit Petitioners to review, examine, inspect, and duplicate such materials including electronic images of electronic drives used by Respondents in the General Election;
ORDERS Respondents to terminate all employees, agents, and contractors shown to have had knowledge of or acquiesced in the improper acts described herein;
GRANTS Petitioners request for this case to remain active through the 2022 statewide elections in order for the Court to supervise the 2022 elections in Fulton County;
Upon completion of the forensic examination, based upon the evidence, enter an Order commanding Respondents to certify the correct vote total to the Secretary of State.”
Read 📝 Perdue Petition
Related ⚖️ Judge Amero VoterGA Dismissal, VoterGA Appeal, Kemp Orders Investigation Into Sloppy Vote Counts
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Newly-announced Georgia gubernatorial candidate David Purdue has filed a 78-page Petition to inspect Fulton County’s absentee ballots, citing “counterfeit ballots” and “equal protection” violations.
The Purdue Petition begins:
“Fulton County Board of Registration Elections Director Richard Barron and his agents… negligently, grossly negligently or intentionally engaged in and/or permitted multiple unlawful election acts and omissions [which] circumvented the majority vote of the people of the State of Georgia and thereby affected the outcome of the statewide General Election on November 3, 2020 in several races including the United States Senate race of Petitioner Perdue.”
The lawsuit acknowledges that “the factual and legal issues raised in this action are similar” to the VoterGA “Favorito-Jeffords Case” and requests that the Court “appoint Chief Judge Amero to preside over this case just as the court did in the Favorito-Jeffords Case.”
Team Purdue continues:
“This action is not an election contest case… Petitioners need not, and do not, seek redress under any federal law.
The unlawful, erroneous, negligent, grossly negligent, willful, malicious, corrupt, deceitful, and intentional manipulation of votes by Respondents violates the principles of democracy and the foundation of the Georgia Republic and is what Georgia’s founding fathers sought to prohibit when they thoughtfully crafted the Georgia Constitution to guarantee all citizens the right to one vote and the right to seek relief from the judiciary to protect their one vote from dilution, discrimination, and debasement.
From November 3, 2020 to November 4, 2020, several batches of absentee ballots were scanned multiple times, and those votes corrupt and erroneous totals were unlawfully included in the certified number of votes submitted by Fulton County to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office.
Additionally, about 161 batches of ballots representing approximately 16,000 ballots cast were withheld by Respondents from the certified results that were submitted to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office.
Thousands of unlawful counterfeit ballots were scanned, tabulated, and included in the certified total of votes submitted by Respondents to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office as established by the sworn testimony of Voyles and photographs of absentee ballots, which ballots show no creases or folds as would be required if the ballots had been placed inside absentee ballot envelopes and mailed. Respondents’ actions in this regard were ministerial.
THE PETITIONERS respectfully pray that this Court…
ORDERS to unseal absentee ballots, absentee ballot return envelopes, the absentee ballot election reports, and other paper and electronic information election materials from the General Election and to permit Petitioners to review, examine, inspect, and duplicate such materials including electronic images of electronic drives used by Respondents in the General Election;
ORDERS Respondents to terminate all employees, agents, and contractors shown to have had knowledge of or acquiesced in the improper acts described herein;
GRANTS Petitioners request for this case to remain active through the 2022 statewide elections in order for the Court to supervise the 2022 elections in Fulton County;
Upon completion of the forensic examination, based upon the evidence, enter an Order commanding Respondents to certify the correct vote total to the Secretary of State.”
Read 📝 Perdue Petition
Related ⚖️ Judge Amero VoterGA Dismissal, VoterGA Appeal, Kemp Orders Investigation Into Sloppy Vote Counts
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Telegram
Liberty Overwatch
David Purdue Petition to Inspect Fulton County Absentee Ballots
Summary 📝 Liberty Overwatch
Hat tip🤠 SSPatriot1, @BannonWarRoom
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Summary 📝 Liberty Overwatch
Hat tip🤠 SSPatriot1, @BannonWarRoom
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍3
DC Board of Elections Sued for Keeping Voter Data Secret | Epoch Times
A good-government group is suing the District of Columbia in federal court for refusing to allow the inspection of voter list maintenance records as required by federal law.
The D.C. Board of Elections claims it can’t provide the voter list maintenance documents because of its contract with the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a nonprofit that describes its mission as “assisting states to improve the accuracy of America’s voter rolls and increase access to voter registration for all eligible citizens.” ERIC was created in 2012 with assistance from The Pew Charitable Trusts, a left-wing philanthropy.
The District of Columbia, along with 31 states, outsources the maintenance of its voter rolls to ERIC. ERIC regularly provides the district board with reports showing which registered voters are no longer eligible because they have died or relocated. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 says that all records used to add or remove voters are public records, yet the board denied a group’s request to inspect the reports ERIC provides to the board.
According to the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), which brought this lawsuit, ERIC has a history of inaccuracy in removing deceased and other ineligible registrants from voter rolls.
“ERIC is being used to hide decisions about who gets to vote and who is removed from the rolls,” said PILF President J. Christian Adams, a former U.S. Justice Department civil rights attorney.
Read more🗞 Epoch Times, PILF Lawsuit, PILF Press Release
Subscribe 👉 @ElectionFraud20_org
Related 📺 Anatomy of the Steal - Phase 1: Dirty Voter Rolls
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
A good-government group is suing the District of Columbia in federal court for refusing to allow the inspection of voter list maintenance records as required by federal law.
The D.C. Board of Elections claims it can’t provide the voter list maintenance documents because of its contract with the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a nonprofit that describes its mission as “assisting states to improve the accuracy of America’s voter rolls and increase access to voter registration for all eligible citizens.” ERIC was created in 2012 with assistance from The Pew Charitable Trusts, a left-wing philanthropy.
The District of Columbia, along with 31 states, outsources the maintenance of its voter rolls to ERIC. ERIC regularly provides the district board with reports showing which registered voters are no longer eligible because they have died or relocated. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 says that all records used to add or remove voters are public records, yet the board denied a group’s request to inspect the reports ERIC provides to the board.
According to the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), which brought this lawsuit, ERIC has a history of inaccuracy in removing deceased and other ineligible registrants from voter rolls.
“ERIC is being used to hide decisions about who gets to vote and who is removed from the rolls,” said PILF President J. Christian Adams, a former U.S. Justice Department civil rights attorney.
Read more🗞 Epoch Times, PILF Lawsuit, PILF Press Release
Subscribe 👉 @ElectionFraud20_org
Related 📺 Anatomy of the Steal - Phase 1: Dirty Voter Rolls
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
www.theepochtimes.com
DC Board of Elections Sued for Keeping Voter Data Secret
A good-government group is suing the District of Columbia in federal court for refusing to allow the inspection ...
👍3
Cruel: Jussie Smollett Will Be Forced To Share A Jail Cell With His Attacker
Criminal justice watchdogs also revealed that in addition to sharing a cell with his attackers, he will have to share his toothbrush, his bunk bed, and clothes. They expressed worry that this may lead to Jussie Smollet suffering further racist and homophobic attacks from other attackers named Jussie Smollett while in prison.
Read 😂 Babylon Bee Satire🐝
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Criminal justice watchdogs also revealed that in addition to sharing a cell with his attackers, he will have to share his toothbrush, his bunk bed, and clothes. They expressed worry that this may lead to Jussie Smollet suffering further racist and homophobic attacks from other attackers named Jussie Smollett while in prison.
Read 😂 Babylon Bee Satire🐝
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Babylon Bee
Cruel: Jussie Smollett Will Be Forced To Share A Jail Cell With His Attacker
CHICAGO, IL—People are protesting in the streets today after human rights groups revealed Jussie Smollett will be forced to share a jail cell with his racist attackers.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Wisconsin Campaigns & Election Committee Hearing 12/8
Summary 📝 Liberty Overwatch
WI Eye Link 📺 Archived Video
Related🔎
👉 Gableman’s Interim Report
👉 Granny Harvesting Summary
👉 LAB Audit Highlights
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Summary 📝 Liberty Overwatch
WI Eye Link 📺 Archived Video
Related🔎
👉 Gableman’s Interim Report
👉 Granny Harvesting Summary
👉 LAB Audit Highlights
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Wisconsin Hearing Emails Show Democrat Operatives Coordinating With City Election Officials | UncoverDC
Wendi Strauch Mahoney, UncoverDC crafted a comprehensive summary of the powerful two-hour December 8th Wisconsin Elections Committee hearing, detailing the coordination between Democrat operatives and city and state election officials. Wendi ties in data from ElectionFraud20 and Erick Kaardal of the Wisconsin Voter Alliance (affiliated with the Amistad Project), and describes the numerous WI voter file irregularities identified by Jeff O’Donnell, which are consistent with phantom vote padding.
Read 🗞 UncoverDC
🤗 Thanks for the Liberty Overwatch shout-out @WendiStrauchMahoneyUDC
Watch 📺 WI Hearing
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread - Suspicious Voter Roll Activity
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Wendi Strauch Mahoney, UncoverDC crafted a comprehensive summary of the powerful two-hour December 8th Wisconsin Elections Committee hearing, detailing the coordination between Democrat operatives and city and state election officials. Wendi ties in data from ElectionFraud20 and Erick Kaardal of the Wisconsin Voter Alliance (affiliated with the Amistad Project), and describes the numerous WI voter file irregularities identified by Jeff O’Donnell, which are consistent with phantom vote padding.
Read 🗞 UncoverDC
🤗 Thanks for the Liberty Overwatch shout-out @WendiStrauchMahoneyUDC
Watch 📺 WI Hearing
Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread - Suspicious Voter Roll Activity
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
UncoverDC
Wisconsin Hearing Emails Show Democrat Operatives Coordinating With City Election Officials
The Wisconsin Assembly hosted two back-to-back hearings on Dec. 8, showing aggressive coordination between Democrat operatives and city and state election officials in the months running up to the Nov. 2020 election. Voter rolls and election abuse were the…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Fauci’s NIAID Co-Owns Moderna Covid Vaccine
Glenn Beck joined Tucker Carlson to review a newly released ‘confidential agreement’ suggesting that the US government co-owns the Moderna Covid vaccine. Signed 2 weeks before Covid was reported to be a problem, the document specifcies:
“mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly-owned by NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and Moderna.”
The agreement also reveals a partnership with Dr. Ralph Baric whose research collaboration with the Wuhan lab likely led to the development of Covid 19.
So… Fauci’s NIH funds gain-of-function coronavirus research and simultaneously develops and co-owns coronavirus vaccine technology, while colluding to suppress information about the Wuhan lab leak, and then promotes universal jab mandates. Not a good look.
Video🐥 Calvin Robinson
Source docs 📑 Blaze
Learn more 📺 @KanekoaTheGreat: Glenn Beck, Ralph Baric
Related 🗞 Post 9/11 Vaccine Discovery Program
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Glenn Beck joined Tucker Carlson to review a newly released ‘confidential agreement’ suggesting that the US government co-owns the Moderna Covid vaccine. Signed 2 weeks before Covid was reported to be a problem, the document specifcies:
“mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly-owned by NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and Moderna.”
The agreement also reveals a partnership with Dr. Ralph Baric whose research collaboration with the Wuhan lab likely led to the development of Covid 19.
So… Fauci’s NIH funds gain-of-function coronavirus research and simultaneously develops and co-owns coronavirus vaccine technology, while colluding to suppress information about the Wuhan lab leak, and then promotes universal jab mandates. Not a good look.
Video🐥 Calvin Robinson
Source docs 📑 Blaze
Learn more 📺 @KanekoaTheGreat: Glenn Beck, Ralph Baric
Related 🗞 Post 9/11 Vaccine Discovery Program
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Facebook Admits What We’ve Known All Along, Their ‘Fact Checks’ Are Just Opinions
In a response to a recent defamation lawsuit, Meta, formerly known as Facebook, admitted that its fact checks are just censorship laundering tools.
Meta’s attorneys assert that the firm’s fact checks “constitute protected opinion” and do not actually verify facts. “Opinions are not subject to defamation claims,” Anthony Watts explains.
In light of Meta’s admission, it's time for the Washington Post to offer a correction to the piece published on 11/10: Fact checks actually work, even on Facebook. But not enough people see them, notes American Thinker.
“So-called ‘fact-checking’ is a fraud used to cover up the censorship of opinions that differ from those of the powerful Silicon Valley oligarchy. And now we have proof attested to in a court filing by one of the richest companies in the world, represented by some of the most elite lawyers in the world,” American Thinker adds
Read🗞 American Thinker
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
In a response to a recent defamation lawsuit, Meta, formerly known as Facebook, admitted that its fact checks are just censorship laundering tools.
Meta’s attorneys assert that the firm’s fact checks “constitute protected opinion” and do not actually verify facts. “Opinions are not subject to defamation claims,” Anthony Watts explains.
In light of Meta’s admission, it's time for the Washington Post to offer a correction to the piece published on 11/10: Fact checks actually work, even on Facebook. But not enough people see them, notes American Thinker.
“So-called ‘fact-checking’ is a fraud used to cover up the censorship of opinions that differ from those of the powerful Silicon Valley oligarchy. And now we have proof attested to in a court filing by one of the richest companies in the world, represented by some of the most elite lawyers in the world,” American Thinker adds
Read🗞 American Thinker
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍1
Facebook Launches Election Misinformation ‘Fact-Checking’ Campaign Ahead of State Elections
Facebook is launching a campaign to combat “misinformation” ahead of state-level elections next month. The announcement follows its recent admission that its ‘fact-checking’ operation is promoting “protected opinions,” not checking actual facts. Building on its success in manipulating the 2020 election:
“Facebooks is… proactively deploying teams to identify election misinformation and efforts to suppress votes… working closely with our independent fact-checking partners review and rate false content on our apps," the company said in a statement to The Hill.
Read more🗞 The Washington Pundit
Follow 😎 @TheWashingtonPundit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Facebook is launching a campaign to combat “misinformation” ahead of state-level elections next month. The announcement follows its recent admission that its ‘fact-checking’ operation is promoting “protected opinions,” not checking actual facts. Building on its success in manipulating the 2020 election:
“Facebooks is… proactively deploying teams to identify election misinformation and efforts to suppress votes… working closely with our independent fact-checking partners review and rate false content on our apps," the company said in a statement to The Hill.
Read more🗞 The Washington Pundit
Follow 😎 @TheWashingtonPundit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Telegram
The Washington Pundit
(The Hill) Facebook to roll out features on state elections
Facebook is rolling out a suite of features aimed at providing users with reliable information ahead of a slate of state-level elections next month.
The day before the statewide elections, Facebook…
Facebook is rolling out a suite of features aimed at providing users with reliable information ahead of a slate of state-level elections next month.
The day before the statewide elections, Facebook…
Never Forget: ‘Fact-Checks’ Helped Swing the Election for Dems | The Epoch Times, Cape Charles Mirror
“It’s been more than a year since Facebook and Twitter colluded with Democrat-friendly media to censor a story that reflected badly on their preferred candidate less than three weeks before the 2020 election,” the Cape Charles Mirror writes.
“If the full story of the Bidens’ international influence-peddling scheme had been told before the election, polls indicate it [would] have affected the result. Almost 50 percent of Biden voters knew nothing about Hunter’s laptop scandal, according to polling conducted after the election by the Media Research Center, and almost 10 percent said they would not have voted for Biden had they known.”
A November 2020 Epoch Times article detailed the extent to which fact-checks and censorship by BigTech and the propaganda press quarterbacked the election for Dems:
Knowing about allegations involving Biden’s son Hunter’s dealings with officials and firms in China, Ukraine, and Russia would have prompted 9.4 percent of those polled to change their vote, according to a survey (pdf) of 1,750 Biden voters in Nevada, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Michigan.
Subtracting the votes of respondents who said they would have changed their decision from Biden’s total in the seven states would have pushed Trump to 311 electoral votes, more than enough to reelect him, according to the survey.
Read more 🗞The Epoch Times, Cape Charles Mirror
Hat tip🤠 Spirit of Liberty
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
“It’s been more than a year since Facebook and Twitter colluded with Democrat-friendly media to censor a story that reflected badly on their preferred candidate less than three weeks before the 2020 election,” the Cape Charles Mirror writes.
“If the full story of the Bidens’ international influence-peddling scheme had been told before the election, polls indicate it [would] have affected the result. Almost 50 percent of Biden voters knew nothing about Hunter’s laptop scandal, according to polling conducted after the election by the Media Research Center, and almost 10 percent said they would not have voted for Biden had they known.”
A November 2020 Epoch Times article detailed the extent to which fact-checks and censorship by BigTech and the propaganda press quarterbacked the election for Dems:
Knowing about allegations involving Biden’s son Hunter’s dealings with officials and firms in China, Ukraine, and Russia would have prompted 9.4 percent of those polled to change their vote, according to a survey (pdf) of 1,750 Biden voters in Nevada, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Michigan.
Subtracting the votes of respondents who said they would have changed their decision from Biden’s total in the seven states would have pushed Trump to 311 electoral votes, more than enough to reelect him, according to the survey.
Read more 🗞The Epoch Times, Cape Charles Mirror
Hat tip🤠 Spirit of Liberty
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Epoch Times
Almost 10 Percent of Biden Voters in Key States Wouldn’t Have Voted for Him Had They Known About Hunter Biden Dealings: Survey
A segment of voters in seven battleground states who backed former Vice President Joe Biden said they wouldn't ...
Forwarded from TheStormHasArrived17 (TheStormHasArrived17)
Joe Biden didn’t attend the Army/Navy game because he was scared of the Let’s Go Brandon chants.
You know they would have been louder than ever! 🇺🇸
You know they would have been louder than ever! 🇺🇸
Scientists Discover Tipping Point for the Spread of Ideas | Rennsselaer News
Scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have found that when just 10 percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, their belief will always be adopted by the majority of the society. The scientists, who are members of the Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center (SCNARC) at Rensselaer, used computational and analytical methods to discover the tipping point where a minority belief becomes the majority opinion.
“When the number of committed opinion holders is below 10 percent, there is no visible progress in the spread of ideas. It would literally take the amount of time comparable to the age of the universe for this size group to reach the majority,” said SCNARC Director Boleslaw Szymanski, the Claire and Roland Schmitt Distinguished Professor at Rensselaer. “Once that number grows above 10 percent, the idea spreads like flame.”
To reach their conclusion, the scientists developed computer models of various types of social networks. The scientists then “sprinkled” in some true believers throughout each of the networks. These people were completely set in their views and unflappable in modifying those beliefs. As those true believers began to converse with those who held the traditional belief system, the tides gradually and then very abruptly began to shift.
“As agents of change start to convince more and more people, the situation begins to change,” Sreenivasan said. “People begin to question their own views at first and then completely adopt the new view to spread it even further.”
The researchers are now looking looking to study how the percentage might change when input into a model where the society is polarized. Instead of simply holding one traditional view, the society would instead hold two opposing viewpoints. An example of this polarization would be Democrat versus Republican.
Read more🗞 Rennsselaer News
Hat tip🤠 @chiefnerd
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have found that when just 10 percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, their belief will always be adopted by the majority of the society. The scientists, who are members of the Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center (SCNARC) at Rensselaer, used computational and analytical methods to discover the tipping point where a minority belief becomes the majority opinion.
“When the number of committed opinion holders is below 10 percent, there is no visible progress in the spread of ideas. It would literally take the amount of time comparable to the age of the universe for this size group to reach the majority,” said SCNARC Director Boleslaw Szymanski, the Claire and Roland Schmitt Distinguished Professor at Rensselaer. “Once that number grows above 10 percent, the idea spreads like flame.”
To reach their conclusion, the scientists developed computer models of various types of social networks. The scientists then “sprinkled” in some true believers throughout each of the networks. These people were completely set in their views and unflappable in modifying those beliefs. As those true believers began to converse with those who held the traditional belief system, the tides gradually and then very abruptly began to shift.
“As agents of change start to convince more and more people, the situation begins to change,” Sreenivasan said. “People begin to question their own views at first and then completely adopt the new view to spread it even further.”
The researchers are now looking looking to study how the percentage might change when input into a model where the society is polarized. Instead of simply holding one traditional view, the society would instead hold two opposing viewpoints. An example of this polarization would be Democrat versus Republican.
Read more🗞 Rennsselaer News
Hat tip🤠 @chiefnerd
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍2
Forwarded from Captain Keshel and Co. American Election Integrity HQ
As if we needed another case!
Share this with the remaining 10-15% of persuadable Americans.
Share this with the remaining 10-15% of persuadable Americans.
Trump Was Right to Question the Georgia Election Results | Kevin Moncla UncoverDC
On November 4th, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger told the Today Show that Georgia had 4.7M voters in the 2020 election and about 98% of the votes were counted. At the time, Trump had a 103K vote lead:
“We had great success yesterday. We had about 4.7M voters who voted, a record-breaker for us, beats the 4.1M in 2016… We have about 2% left to go, and you can see where we are right now with the results that have been reported. I don’t think they’ll change any outcomes….
We don’t guess. What we do is report. We just see where the candidates are right now in both Presidential, Congressional, and Senatorial, and you look at how many votes are out there. Even if one of the candidates got 100%, it wouldn’t be enough to move it one way or the other.“
Two percent of 4.7M represents about 94K uncounted ballots, which as Raffensperger correctly pointed out, fell below Trump’s 103,705 vote lead.
The SOS was confident enough in these figures to tell the Today Show hosts that the final results would be out by the end of the day (11/4). Raffensperger had every reason to speak to with certainty. His office had purchased a state-of-the-art tracking portal that provided real time monitoring of every absentee ballot. He knew the exact number of ballots and where each one was in the voting chain, Moncla writes.
However, instead of delivering results on 11/4 as promised, Georgia continued counting for another three days, ultimately reporting 5.0M votes on November 7th, adding 300K outcome-altering absentee ballots to Raffensperger’s Today Show total. Where did those extra ballots come from? “More to come soon,” Moncla says.
Read more🗞 Kevin Moncla UncoverDC
Watch 📺 Today Show Interview
Related 🔢 Patrick Colbeck The Missing Link: Vote Tally Audits
Learn more 🔦🧵 GA Thread - David Perdue Files Ballot Inspection Lawsuit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
On November 4th, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger told the Today Show that Georgia had 4.7M voters in the 2020 election and about 98% of the votes were counted. At the time, Trump had a 103K vote lead:
“We had great success yesterday. We had about 4.7M voters who voted, a record-breaker for us, beats the 4.1M in 2016… We have about 2% left to go, and you can see where we are right now with the results that have been reported. I don’t think they’ll change any outcomes….
We don’t guess. What we do is report. We just see where the candidates are right now in both Presidential, Congressional, and Senatorial, and you look at how many votes are out there. Even if one of the candidates got 100%, it wouldn’t be enough to move it one way or the other.“
Two percent of 4.7M represents about 94K uncounted ballots, which as Raffensperger correctly pointed out, fell below Trump’s 103,705 vote lead.
The SOS was confident enough in these figures to tell the Today Show hosts that the final results would be out by the end of the day (11/4). Raffensperger had every reason to speak to with certainty. His office had purchased a state-of-the-art tracking portal that provided real time monitoring of every absentee ballot. He knew the exact number of ballots and where each one was in the voting chain, Moncla writes.
However, instead of delivering results on 11/4 as promised, Georgia continued counting for another three days, ultimately reporting 5.0M votes on November 7th, adding 300K outcome-altering absentee ballots to Raffensperger’s Today Show total. Where did those extra ballots come from? “More to come soon,” Moncla says.
Read more🗞 Kevin Moncla UncoverDC
Watch 📺 Today Show Interview
Related 🔢 Patrick Colbeck The Missing Link: Vote Tally Audits
Learn more 🔦🧵 GA Thread - David Perdue Files Ballot Inspection Lawsuit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
UncoverDC
Trump Was Right to Question the Georgia Election Results - UncoverDC
Georgia's election was anything but regular. Many questions about the 2020 election and the irregularities still need answers.
👍1👏1
True the Vote Update: GBI Declines to Investigate, True the Vote Threatens Lawsuit
We’ve had several requests for an update on True the Vote’s efforts to expose drop box ballot trafficking in Georgia. The following summary is based on an article published by Breitbart in late October:
Sometime around October 21st, Victor Reynolds, Director of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI), publicly shared a September 30th letter he wrote to True the Vote and Georgia Republican Party Chairman David Shafer. In the letter, Reynolds declines to investigate True the Vote’s ballot trafficking allegations due to insufficient evidence:
“[True the Vote provided the GBI with a] spreadsheet listing approximately 1,048,575 Mobile Device Identification Numbers and their geolocation from October 1, 2020 to January 5, 2021.
Of those datapoints, the spreadsheets identify 279 cellphones which had made multiple trips to within 100 feet of a voter drop box. Other spreadsheets and documents provided tie these cell phones through geolocation to various organizations.
What has not been provided is any other kind of evidence that ties these cell phones to ballot harvesting; for example, there are no statements of witnesses and no names of any potential defendants to interview. Saliently, it has been stated that there is ‘a source’ that can validate ballot harvesting. Despite repeated requests that source has not been provided to either the GBI or to the FBI.
As it exists, the data, while curious, does not rise to the level of probable cause that a crime has been committed.”
On October 22nd, True the Vote’s attorney Jim Bopp submitted a letter to Gov. Brian Kemp requesting that he, along with the GBI and SOS Brad Raffensperger, preserve all documents “in light of the serious nature of the [GBI Director’s] leak and the likelihood of litigation,” arguing that the GBI letter “should never have been taken from the FBI files and publicly released” as it contained “information provided confidentially to the FBI.”
In his letter to Kemp, Bopp notes that Director Reynolds’ letter “mischaracterizes and selectively omits the evidence that True the Vote provided in a confidential meeting attended by representatives of your office, and representatives of the GBI, including the author of the letter in question, GBI Director D. Victor Reynolds.”
Bopp’s letter to Kemp continues:
The letter [released to the media by GBI Director Reynolds] acknowledges that True the Vote’s preliminary data analysis, as presented to your office in April of 2021, provided evidence that 279 cellphones had made “multiple trips to within 100 feet of a voter drop box” during the 2020 General Election and U.S. Senate Runoff Election Periods. Despite characterizing this data as “curious,” GBI Director Reynolds claimed such evidence could not “rise to the level of probable cause.”
This preliminary data, first provided to the FBI in March [by True the Vote], has been augmented by True the Vote’s further data analysis, voter drop box surveillance video, chain of custody documents, and other critical corroborating evidence. Notably, Director Reynolds refused to meet with representatives of True the Vote after April of 2021 so that he could supplement the preliminary data he found so “curious.”
What is actually curious is Director Reynolds’ legal analysis on probable cause, as similar information has been found to provide probable cause leading to indictments related to election crimes in other states. Curiouser still, is Director Reynolds’ repeated communications to True the Vote’s representatives stating that he had no jurisdiction to investigate or address these potential election crimes, even if given what he deemed sufficient probable cause…
[W]e request that your office, the GBI, and any other recipient copied on this letter preserve all correspondence, whether verbal and written, related to this matter.
Read more🗞 Breitbart, GBI Letter, TTV Letter to Kemp
Related 🔎 True the Vote on War Room
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
We’ve had several requests for an update on True the Vote’s efforts to expose drop box ballot trafficking in Georgia. The following summary is based on an article published by Breitbart in late October:
Sometime around October 21st, Victor Reynolds, Director of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI), publicly shared a September 30th letter he wrote to True the Vote and Georgia Republican Party Chairman David Shafer. In the letter, Reynolds declines to investigate True the Vote’s ballot trafficking allegations due to insufficient evidence:
“[True the Vote provided the GBI with a] spreadsheet listing approximately 1,048,575 Mobile Device Identification Numbers and their geolocation from October 1, 2020 to January 5, 2021.
Of those datapoints, the spreadsheets identify 279 cellphones which had made multiple trips to within 100 feet of a voter drop box. Other spreadsheets and documents provided tie these cell phones through geolocation to various organizations.
What has not been provided is any other kind of evidence that ties these cell phones to ballot harvesting; for example, there are no statements of witnesses and no names of any potential defendants to interview. Saliently, it has been stated that there is ‘a source’ that can validate ballot harvesting. Despite repeated requests that source has not been provided to either the GBI or to the FBI.
As it exists, the data, while curious, does not rise to the level of probable cause that a crime has been committed.”
On October 22nd, True the Vote’s attorney Jim Bopp submitted a letter to Gov. Brian Kemp requesting that he, along with the GBI and SOS Brad Raffensperger, preserve all documents “in light of the serious nature of the [GBI Director’s] leak and the likelihood of litigation,” arguing that the GBI letter “should never have been taken from the FBI files and publicly released” as it contained “information provided confidentially to the FBI.”
In his letter to Kemp, Bopp notes that Director Reynolds’ letter “mischaracterizes and selectively omits the evidence that True the Vote provided in a confidential meeting attended by representatives of your office, and representatives of the GBI, including the author of the letter in question, GBI Director D. Victor Reynolds.”
Bopp’s letter to Kemp continues:
The letter [released to the media by GBI Director Reynolds] acknowledges that True the Vote’s preliminary data analysis, as presented to your office in April of 2021, provided evidence that 279 cellphones had made “multiple trips to within 100 feet of a voter drop box” during the 2020 General Election and U.S. Senate Runoff Election Periods. Despite characterizing this data as “curious,” GBI Director Reynolds claimed such evidence could not “rise to the level of probable cause.”
This preliminary data, first provided to the FBI in March [by True the Vote], has been augmented by True the Vote’s further data analysis, voter drop box surveillance video, chain of custody documents, and other critical corroborating evidence. Notably, Director Reynolds refused to meet with representatives of True the Vote after April of 2021 so that he could supplement the preliminary data he found so “curious.”
What is actually curious is Director Reynolds’ legal analysis on probable cause, as similar information has been found to provide probable cause leading to indictments related to election crimes in other states. Curiouser still, is Director Reynolds’ repeated communications to True the Vote’s representatives stating that he had no jurisdiction to investigate or address these potential election crimes, even if given what he deemed sufficient probable cause…
[W]e request that your office, the GBI, and any other recipient copied on this letter preserve all correspondence, whether verbal and written, related to this matter.
Read more🗞 Breitbart, GBI Letter, TTV Letter to Kemp
Related 🔎 True the Vote on War Room
Learn more🔦🧵 GA Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Breitbart
True the Vote Sends Document Preservation Letter to GA Gov Kemp
The attorney for election integrity watchdog True the Vote sent Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R-GA) a document preservation letter on Friday.
👍4
Livestream Link for Pima County, AZ Election Integrity Hearing Tomorrow 12/13 at 9AM MT
“The witness list will include subject matter experts in statistical analysis, real numbers analysis from returned ballots, electronic tabulation, & both digital canvassing and door knocking.”
- Rep. Mark Finchem
Watch 📺 RSBN Livestream
Details 🔎 Rep. Finchem Press Release
Related📃 Trump Statement on Pima County
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
“The witness list will include subject matter experts in statistical analysis, real numbers analysis from returned ballots, electronic tabulation, & both digital canvassing and door knocking.”
- Rep. Mark Finchem
Watch 📺 RSBN Livestream
Details 🔎 Rep. Finchem Press Release
Related📃 Trump Statement on Pima County
Learn more🔦🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN) - Live Coverage of Political Events, News and Commentary
WATCH LIVE: Pima County, Ariz. Election Integrity Hearing 12/13/21
WATCH LIVE: Pima County, Arizona Election Integrity Hearing; What exactly happened in the 2020 Election? 12/13/21 PIMA COUNTY - All eyes are on Pima County, Ariz. where election experts are looking into alleged voting discrepancies in the 2020 presidential…
👍1
DeSantis Proposes $8 Million in Budget to Relocate Illegal Immigrants to Delaware, Martha’s Vineyard | Epoch Times
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis earmarked $8 million in his 2022–23 budget to transport illegal immigrants out of The Sunshine State.
He proposed the spending in the Freedom First Budget to protect against harms resulting from illegal immigration. The spending may include the transportation of unauthorized aliens located within Florida to other states or the District of Columbia.
“In yesterday’s budget, I put in $8 million for us to be able to transport people [who are in the US] illegally out of the state of Florida,” he said during a press conference on Friday.
The Republican governor listed Delaware, President Joe Biden’s hometown state, and Martha’s Vineyard, where former President Barack Obama owns a mansion, as potential destinations to relocate the illegal immigrants.
“If you sent [illegal immigrants] to Delaware or Martha’s Vineyard or some of these places, that border would be secure the next day,” he said.
Read 🗞 Epoch Times, Freedom First Budget
Learn more🔦🧵 Biden’s Border Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis earmarked $8 million in his 2022–23 budget to transport illegal immigrants out of The Sunshine State.
He proposed the spending in the Freedom First Budget to protect against harms resulting from illegal immigration. The spending may include the transportation of unauthorized aliens located within Florida to other states or the District of Columbia.
“In yesterday’s budget, I put in $8 million for us to be able to transport people [who are in the US] illegally out of the state of Florida,” he said during a press conference on Friday.
The Republican governor listed Delaware, President Joe Biden’s hometown state, and Martha’s Vineyard, where former President Barack Obama owns a mansion, as potential destinations to relocate the illegal immigrants.
“If you sent [illegal immigrants] to Delaware or Martha’s Vineyard or some of these places, that border would be secure the next day,” he said.
Read 🗞 Epoch Times, Freedom First Budget
Learn more🔦🧵 Biden’s Border Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
www.theepochtimes.com
DeSantis Proposes $8 Million in Budget to Relocate Illegal Immigrants to Delaware, Martha's Vineyard
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis set $8 million in his 2022–23 budget to transport illegal immigrants out of The ...
👍1